New Yorkers Celebrate ‘Victory for Citizen Rights’ After Court Blocks Foreign Nationals from Voting in NYC

New York officials are celebrating after the state’s Supreme Court struck down a Democrat-passed law that gave municipal voting rights to foreign nationals living in New York City.

Last year, Democrats on the 51-member New York City Council approved a plan that allows more than 800,000 foreign nationals with green cards, visas, and work permits the opportunity to vote in citywide elections as long as they have resided in the city for at least 30 consecutive days.

A multilingual "Vote here" sign is displayed in the voting room at Christ Lutheran Church in Monterey Park, Los Angeles County, on November 6, 2012 in California, as Americans flock to the polls nationwide to decide between President Barack Obama, his Republican challenger Mitt Romney, and a wide range of other issues. Monterey Park is one of six cities in California's 49th Assembly District, the state's first legislative district where Asian-Americans make up the majority of the population.

A multilingual “Vote here” sign is displayed in the voting room at Christ Lutheran Church in Monterey Park, Los Angeles County, California, on November 6, 2012. (FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images)

On Monday the New York Supreme Court ruled that the law is “illegal, null, and void” because “it is clear … that voting is a right granted to citizens of the United States.”

Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY), who is running for governor, praised the decision:

Voting is a sacred right of U.S. citizens, and, today, the New York State Supreme Court correctly reaffirmed that right. One person, one vote belongs to U.S. citizens, and no one else! No way should noncitizens be allowed to vote. [Emphasis added]

Lee Zeldin appears during New York’s Republican gubernatorial debate at the studios of Spectrum News NY1 on Monday, June 20, 2022, in New York. (Brittainy Newman/Newsday via AP, Pool)

New York City Councilman Robert Holden, a Democrat from Queens who joined the state’s Republican Party and naturalized American citizens in their suit against the law, also applauded the ruling.

“I applaud today’s court decision in favor of our bi-partisan lawsuit, affirming what we already knew: non-citizen voting in [New York] is a violation of law,” Holden said. “It’s a victory for citizens’ rights and will encourage permanent residents to pursue citizenship and fully commit to our nation.”

“Citizenship and suffrage have always been tied together for good reason, and must never be torn from each other,” Holden continued.

Councilman Joe Borelli (R-Staten Island) said the ruling “validates those of us who can read the plain English words of our state constitution and state statutes: noncitizen voting in New York is illegal…”

“Shame on those who thought they could skirt the law for political gain,” he said.

Councilwoman Inna Vernikov (R-Brooklyn) called voting a “sacred right and privilege that is granted exclusively to citizens of the United States. As an immigrant,” she continued, “… I am proud to be a plaintiff in this lawsuit.”

Likewise, Councilwoman Joann Ariola (R-Queens) called the ruling “a win for democracy.”

New York State Republican Party Chairman Nick Langworthy said the ruling is “another victory for citizen rights, election integrity, and the rule of law” and vowed to continue fighting the issue in court:

Time and again, New York Democrats have abused the power entrusted to them to illegally rig the system while trampling on citizen’s rights. Whether it was this outrageous violation or their illegal gerrymander, we have proven that we will fight them in court and win, but this should serve as yet another reason why we need to break up one-Party rule and restore balance and accountability to our government. [Emphasis added]

Dale Wilcox of the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI), which filed a friend of the court brief in support of the suit against the law, said he is “pleased this law is now null and void.”

“Laws such as this are an attack on the very idea of American nationhood,” Wilcox said in a statement. “The sovereign of this democratic nation is the people, U.S. citizens. When their power is eroded, our nation begins to lose its independence.”

The case is Fossella v. AdamsNo. 172 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.

Source

Why Both Republicans And Democrats Are Wrong About Bill Barr

Why Both Republicans And Democrats Are Wrong About Bill Barr

Last week, the Jan. 6“Committee” featured video clips from former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr during its hearing on the violence that erupted at the capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. For the few Americans following the show trial, Barr’s testimony seemed a denial by former President Donald Trump’s top law enforcement officer of any legitimate basis to challenge the outcome of the November 2020 election.

To Democrats, this proved Trump sought to steal the White House from Biden via a coup. To Republicans, Barr revealed himself as a traitor uninterested in investigating voter fraud. Neither view is correct.

In his deposition, Barr testified about his disagreements with the then-president about claims of election fraud. Barr resigned as attorney general on December 14, 2020, in the aftermath of the November general election as Trump continued to dispute the outcome. The day he resigned, Barr explained, when he walked in to speak with the president,

[Trump] went off on a monologue saying that there was now definitive evidence involving fraud through the Dominion machines and a report had been prepared by a very reputable cybersecurity firm, which he identified as Allied Security Operations Group. And he held up the report and he had — and then he asked that a copy of it be made for me. And while a copy was being made, he said, you know, ‘This is absolute proof that the Dominion machines were rigged.’

Barr testified to the committee that he had told the president “they’ve wasted a whole month on these claims — on the Dominion voting machines and they were idiotic claims.” There was “absolutely zero basis for the allegations,” Barr explained, yet people believed there was “this systemic corruption in the system and that their votes didn’t count and that these machines controlled by somebody else were actually determining it, which was complete nonsense.”

Then-President Trump also raised what he called “the big vote dump” in Detroit, Barr explained, where “people saw boxes coming into the counting station at all hours of the morning and so forth.” Barr told the committee that he had explained to Trump that there were approximately 630 precincts in Detroit, “and unlike elsewhere in the state, they centralize the counting process. So they’re not counted in each precinct, they’re moved to counting stations. And so a normal process would involve boxes coming in at all different hours.” Barr said point blank, “There’s no indication of fraud in Detroit.”

The committee also heard testimony that Barr had directed B.J. Pak, the then-U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, to investigate a security tape from the State Farm Arena in Atlanta that Trump believed showed a suitcase of illegal ballots secreted beneath a table being pulled out after election workers had been sent home for the night. Pak explained they investigated the claims and that the longer segment on the video established the alleged black suitcase was actually an official lockbox where ballots were kept safe.

The bottom line, according to Barr’s testimony, was that he “had not seen any widespread election fraud that would question the outcome of the election,” and that “the stuff” Trump’s people “were shoveling out to the public were bullsh-t. . . the claims of fraud were bullsh-t.”

Detroit and Atlanta Weren’t the Only Concerns

Claims of election fraud, however, represented but a portion of Trump’s challenges to the November 2020 results. Also, that the above claims were “bullsh-t” says nothing about whether there were systemic violations of election law and illegal voting. Nor were those questions ones for the attorney general or the U.S. attorneys investigating allegations of fraud.

Barr made this point in his testimony when he explained that he had told Trump “the department doesn’t take sides in elections, and the department is not an extension of — of [Trump’s] legal team. And our role is to investigate fraud.” Barr’s testimony also made clear that the U.S. Department of Justice investigated claims of fraud, such as the supposed “suitcase” of ballots in Atlanta.

But what Barr didn’t investigate—and indeed shouldn’t have investigated—were the many violations of state election law highlighted by Trump’s legal team in their lawsuits challenging the election results. For instance, in Georgia, the state election code requires residents to “vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election” and “outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, ‘their vote in that county would be illegal.’”

Trump’s legal team obtained solid evidence that as many as 30,000 Georgia residents voted illegally in their prior county in 2020. Trump never had his day in court on this challenge, though, which theoretically could have resulted in Georgia’s election results tossed.

That’s not the business of the attorney general, however, so those Republicans seeing Barr as derelict misunderstand his role. Likewise, those Democrats championing Barr’s words, believing it establishes a coup attempt by Trump, ignore that his testimony focused solely on election fraud.

Dust-Up About Alleged Vote Trafficking

The former attorney general’s testimony concerning vote harvesting perfectly illustrates the misplaced role both the right and the left sought to ascribe to Barr. During last week’s Jan. 6 Committee hearing, Barr testified it was his “opinion then” and his “opinion now” “that the election was not stolen by fraud.” He added that he hadn’t seen anything since the election that changed his “mind on that, including the ‘2,000 Mules’movie.”

The “2,000 Mules” movie, produced by Dinesh D’Souza, “includes information about an investigation by election integrity group True The Vote and features its founder Catherine Engelbrecht and its election intelligence analyst Gregg Phillips.” D’Souza’s film explains True The Vote’s use of “GPS surveillance geolocation data emitted by cellphones to help identify phones in key battleground states that made numerous trips to multiple election drop boxes and, in Georgia, to non-profits which the film does not identify.” The movie also includes videos “of persons placing multiple ballots into drop boxes—which is illegal in some states, including Georgia, unless those ballots are for family members.”

Barr told the committee that both he and the Georgia Bureau of Investigations were unimpressed with the use of cellphone geolocation data because, “if you take 2 million cell phones and — and figure out where they are physically in a big city like Atlanta or wherever, just by definition you’re going to find many hundreds of them have passed by and spent time in the vicinity of these boxes.”

The former attorney general added, though, that he held “his fire” on “the photographic evidence…because I thought, well, h-ll, if they have a lot of photographs of the same person dumping a lot of ballots in different boxes, you know, that’s hard to explain.” There “was a little bit of” photographic evidence from “2,000 Mules,” Barr said, but he found “it was lacking,” and that it “didn’t establish widespread illegal harvesting.”

In response to Barr’s deposition testimony, the “2,000 Mules” producer took to Twitter, challenging the former attorney general to a public debate. “What do you say, Barr?” D’Souza tweeted. “Do you dare back up your belly laughs with arguments that can withstand rebuttal and cross-examination?” D’Souza added in comments to The Epoch Times, “The hearings are one-sided propaganda, not an attempt to get to the truth.” The producer then invited people to view the evidence in “2,000 Mules” and judge for themselves.

Vote Trafficking Isn’t the AG’s Purview

Some Republicans saw Barr’s dig at D’Souza’s movie as proof the former attorney general was “totally disinterested” in election fraud, while Democrats framed Barr’s comments as establishing Trump’s attempt at a coup. Ignored by both sides, however, was what Barr said next:

The other thing is people don’t understand is that it’s not clear that even if you can show harvesting that that changes the — or the results of the election. The courts are not going to throw out votes and then figure out what votes were harvested and throw them out. You’d still — the burden on the challenging party to show that illegal votes were cast, votes were the result of undue influence or bribes or there was really, you know, the person was non compos mentis. But absent that evidence, I just didn’t see courts throwing out votes anyway.

With these few sentences Barr capsulized the disconnect between what many Trump voters believed the attorney general and federal prosecutors’ roles to be following the November 2020 election, and the reality that the Department of Justice’s focus rests on provable federal crimes. Barr tasked federal prosecutors with investigating allegations of widespread fraud, such as the manipulation of the Dominion voting machines and the supposed secreted suitcases of hidden ballots. U.S. attorney offices found the charges unfounded. And while ballot harvesting may be illegal under some states’ election codes, for the Department of Justice to get involved, more than that would be needed.

But even then, as Barr noted, that doesn’t undo the election, or rendered Georgia, Michigan, or Pennsylvania’s results void. Rather, courts hear and decide election challenges, and such challenges extend far beyond issues of election fraud. Therein is the reason Democrats’ parading of Barr’s testimony is also misplaced.

While Barr could testify concerning the cases of voter fraud the Department of Justice investigated, in the aftermath of the November 2020 election the former attorney general did not scrutinize, nor should he have, violations of state election law or potential violations of the Equal Protection Clause caused by the states’ disparate standards applied during the election.

Evidence of Widespread Illegal Votes

And Trump’s legal team had solid evidence of systemic violations of the election code and the widespread counting of illegal votes, as well as potential Equal Protection violations. Further, in the case of Georgia, there were enough illegal votes cast to likely render the state’s election results void.

Attorney General Barr, however, lacked both the authority (and the tools) to render judgment on matters of state election law. His deposition testimony to the committee also suggests that matters of election law remain outside his wheelhouse, as a court need not identify the ballots illegally harvested or cast to rule the election results invalid, as Barr seemed to suggest. Rather, under Georgia election law, if the “evidence established that there are more illegal or irregular votes than the margin of victory, the remedy is a new election.”

In other words, for Georgia’s results to be undone, Trump only needed to establish there were 11,780 illegal votes; he did not need to identify the illegally cast ballots and establish they represented votes for Biden in sufficient numbers to render him the winner.

That’s why, in his widely misrepresented telephone call with the Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffenperger, Trump said, “All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes.” Trump’s legal team had found the votes, but the Georgia courts refused to timely consider Trump’s challenges.

Why Unconstitutional Voting Was Allowed

Likewise, many of the issues Trump’s legal team raised after the general election and before the results were certified, remained unanswered until a year or more later, when state courts declared the procedures used in November 2020 illegal or unconstitutional.

Nothing Barr did or could have done could have altered the reality that there is insufficient time between the November election and the certification of the vote for states to do much more than a recount and audit, and the Department of Justice to conduct a high-level investigation of what would need to be widespread and obvious fraud to be caught in time to change the outcome of an election.

Yet evidence accumulated since Biden was certified the winner of the 2020 election makes clear that in every swing state, systemic violations of the election code occurred. While moving to the widespread use of mail-in voting in the name of Covid-19 exacerbated the problems, post-election scrutiny of the last general election reveals that every defect in our electoral system identified in 2005 by the bipartisan Commission on Election Reform, co-chaired by Democrat Jimmy Carter and Republican Jim Baker, remains a problem today.

At the time, Carter and Baker warned in the commission’s 100-plus page report that “elections are the heart of democracy” and “if elections are defective, the entire democratic system is at risk.” The commission added as a corollary to that first principle that “confidence in elections matters equally, and in fact “is central to our nation’s democracy.”

So, when the Jan. 6 Committee show trial finally ends, Americans need to remember election integrity is not about Trump or Barr, nor Democrats or Republicans: It is about our country and her future. That future depends on a serious revamping of the American electoral system—and soon.


Margot Cleveland is The Federalist’s senior legal correspondent. She is also a contributor to National Review Online, the Washington Examiner, Aleteia, and Townhall.com, and has been published in the Wall Street Journal and USA Today. Cleveland is a lawyer and a graduate of the Notre Dame Law School, where she earned the Hoynes Prize—the law school’s highest honor. She later served for nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk for a federal appellate judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Cleveland is a former full-time university faculty member and now teaches as an adjunct from time to time. As a stay-at-home homeschooling mom of a young son with cystic fibrosis, Cleveland frequently writes on cultural issues related to parenting and special-needs children. Cleveland is on Twitter at @ProfMJCleveland. The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity.

Source

Trump demands Equal Time on TV networks to counter J-6 Hearings

Trump demands Equal Time on TV networks to counter J-6 Hearings


Trump demands Equal Time on TV networks to counter J-6 Hearings

Ex-president says he should be allowed to present his side of the case, including election irregularities and Democrat failures to secure the Capitol

By John Solomon

Kept by congressional Democrats from putting on a defense, former President Donald Trump demanded Thursday that television networks airing the Jan. 6 committee hearings provide him equal time to present his side.

“I DEMAND EQUAL TIME!!!” Trump said in a midday statement posted on his Truth Social media site, just before the Democrat-led panel began its third, televised hearing on the Capitol riots.

“The Fake News Networks are perpetuating lies, falsehoods, and Russia, Russia, Russia-type disinformation (same sick people, here we go again!) by allowing the low rated but nevertheless one sided and slanderous Unselect Committee hearings to go endlessly and aimlessly on (and on and on!),” the 45th president also said.

Democrats holding the Jan. 6 hearings have refused to let House Republicans put their own members on the committee and have openly talked about the hearings being a vehicle to keep Trump from running again.

“The point is that the constitutional purpose is clear, to keep people exactly like Donald Trump and other traitors to the union from holding public office,” Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., told ABC News earlier this year.

Trump’s statement appeared to appeal to the Federal Communications Commission’s equal time provision that mandates U.S. radio and television broadcast stations provide an equivalent opportunity to any opposing political candidates who request it if their opponents has gotten it. 

Trump called the hearings “a one-sided, highly partisan Witch Hunt, the likes of which has never been seen in Congress before and that he deserved time on national TV to present his side of the case, including election irregularities and Democrat failures to secure Capitol.”

He also said: “I am hereby demanding EQUAL TIME to spell out the massive Voter Fraud & Dem Security Breach!”

_________

RELATED

Trump congratulates Nancy Mace for surviving primary challenge he supported

Investment firm says still on track to merge with Trump’s social media company despite SEC probe

Donald Trump says Biden’s America is ‘Venezuela on Steroids’

***********

(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News.  Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

Header featured image (edited) credit:  Trump/orginal Just the News article

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

Unintelligent majority has not yet caught on

Unintelligent majority has not yet caught on

Editorial

Cairns News celebrated 10 years of publication in March this year breaking some incredible national and international stories during this tumultuous period of world upheaval.

Our panel of contributors has been keeping close watch on the unfolding federal election trying to gauge if the dumbed-down majority of voters has yet woken up to the greatest scams in modern human history.

We had covid, global warming then climate change which have been the most sophisticated public indoctrination campaigns ever waged by government against its citizens.

Still the unintelligent majority, it seems, has not yet caught on to the subterfuge.

With this in mind our panel does not think it worthwhile to keep bashing our heads against the wall in an attempt to educate the majority about the inferno in which they will burn.

While the covid vaxx deaths are mounting up daily the TGA, lying doctors and the media are obfuscating the data.

Several imminent doctors and epidemiologists have predicted the death rate will rise exponentially over the next three years resulting in tens of millions of vaxx-related deaths across the world.

Therefore if the party duopoly is re-elected we have given honorarily, ten years of solid work and research for nothing. Should the duopoly scrape back with the aid of widespread voter fraud in marginal seats then we will wind down Cairns News.

We are talking to a few journalists who have been squeezed out of their jobs by Murdoch et al, who have expressed interest in continuing this publication which was being read in 104 countries yesterday. Perhaps they might keep it going?

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen’s nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no ‘government’ of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Source

Dinesh D’Souza Releases Expanded Preview Trailer for 2000 Mules, The Ballot Harvesting Story of the 2020 Election

Dinesh D’Souza Releases Expanded Preview Trailer for 2000 Mules, The Ballot Harvesting Story of the 2020 Election

Dinesh D’Souza has released an expanded trailer for the upcoming release: “Here’s the official trailer for “2000 Mules.” It’s the movie we’ve all been waiting for. Please share! And go to 2000Mules.com to buy your ticket to see the movie in its premiere week.”

The movie documentary showing how the 2020 election was manipulated through the use of mail in ballots will be released in select theaters May 2nd and May 4th, virtual premier May 7th and released on-line May 8th.  WATCH:

.

Source

‘America First’ Policy Group Calls on Wisconsin Legislature to Follow Special Counsel’s Election Integrity Reforms 

‘America First’ Policy Group Calls on Wisconsin Legislature to Follow Special Counsel’s Election Integrity Reforms 

The America First Policy Institute (AFPI) sent a letter to the Wisconsin legislature urging them to follow two recommendations made by Special Counsel Michael Gableman regarding election integrity.

In a letter signed by 19 prominent conservatives, AFPI’s Center for Election Integrity chairman Ken Blackwell said Gableman’s recommendations are “much-needed, pragmatic solutions that will ultimately create conditions in Wisconsin that help make it easy to vote but hard to cheat.”

Wisconsin Republicans hired Gableman, a former Wisconsin supreme court justice, last fall as Special Counsel to investigate the 2020 presidential election amid concerns of voter fraud and election irregularities.

Gableman sent the state legislature a second interim investigative report last month that included 26 recommendations to facilitate “transparency” and “political accountability.”

However, Gableman’s suggestions came one week after Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R) held what he said was likely the final legislative session day of the year.

AFPI’s letter urged the state legislature to reconvene “an extraordinary session for the sole purpose of using the constitutional amendment joint resolution mechanism” to implement two of Gableman’s recommendations.

AFPI recommended the legislature follow Gableman’s proposal to create a single statewide publicly available voter registration database.

Blackwell wrote:

The maintenance and ongoing use of several databases and access systems unnecessarily place an undue burden on county clerks and associated personnel in their painstaking mission to be responsible stewards of their data. Moreover, data quality and accessibility are of paramount importance in restoring voter confidence in Wisconsin elections systems, as future analysis of past data sets over time is likely to yield a more full and accurate accounting.

The institute also called on the legislature to create a government office to audit and oversee the state’s elections.

For purposes of long-term improvement in the administration of elections, this step is both necessary and proper to instill transparency and accountability in the facilitation of future statewide elections and perhaps, most importantly, would make a meaningful contribution toward the restoration of voter confidence in the state of Wisconsin.

Lastly, AFPI recommended the state legislature pass a voter identification law.

“Finally, we strongly recommend reconsideration of the language embedded in Assembly Joint Resolution 133 for a photo identification requirement to be added to the Wisconsin Constitution (which did not pass both Chambers in this last session),” the letter said.

“A substantial majority of Americans nationwide (85%) support a photo identification requirement. We fundamentally believe that it is the most common-sense proposal to help ensure safe and secure elections.”

Source

Complaint: Wisconsin Officials Sent Ballot To Ineligible Nursing Home Resident After She ‘Voted’ In Last Two Elections

Complaint: Wisconsin Officials Sent Ballot To Ineligible Nursing Home Resident After She ‘Voted’ In Last Two Elections

An elderly nursing home resident in Wisconsin has allegedly been the victim of voter abuse according to a report from the Thomas More Society, a not-for-profit national public interest law firm. 

Sandra Klitzke, a resident of a Grand Chute, Wis., nursing home, reportedly received an absentee ballot for the upcoming April 5 election despite being legally unable to vote or register to vote since Feb. 21, 2020, in accordance with a ruling made by Outagamie County Circuit Court. Even more alarming, voter records mark Klitzke as having voted in both the Nov. 3, 2020 election and the April 6, 2021 election despite being legally ineligible to vote in either.

An official complaint from the Thomas More Society and Klitzke’s daughter and guardian, Lisa Goodwin, against the Wisconsin Elections Commission, the Grand Chute town clerk, and the Outagamie County Circuit Court clerk details the alleged violations and discusses the scope of voter abuse in the state.

 The complaint specifies that, in response to Goodwin’s petition for guardianship of her mother due to cognitive decline, “the Outagamie County Circuit Court restricted Sandra Klitzke’s right to vote” and that such rights “may not be exercised by any person.”

“I could not explain why the WisVote voting records would have indicated that my mother had voted,” Goodwin explained, clarifying that “Neither I nor any other member of my immediate family completed an absentee ballot for my mother.”

An article from the Thomas More Society specifically alleges that “Wisconsin Elections Commission Administrator Meagan Wolfe, Town Clerk of Grand Chute Angie Cain, and Outagamie County Circuit Court Clerk Barb Bocik” have violated “state law and the Outagamie County Circuit Court Order by allowing a ward under a ‘do not vote’ guardianship order to register and vote.” 

The complaint also charges that, according to data compiled from WisVote, the state of Wisconsin only lists 802 individuals as legally “incompetent” to vote, despite a review of county-by-county records finding that the number should be as high as 5,000.

Wisconsin Elections Commission Administrator Wolfe has previously faced calls to resign from state lawmakers following accusations that she ​​ committed “felonies by telling election clerks to mail absentee ballots to nursing homes instead of visiting them in person during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Previous reporting revealed that in Wisconsin’s Racine County, a woman was recorded as having voted in the 2020 presidential election who had died before Election Day. The Wisconsin Elections Commission also violated state law when it instructed workers at residential care facilities to help residents vote, even if it meant marking their ballots for them.

Further reporting found that there were instances of election fraud at at least 90 different nursing homes across the state, but that District Attorney Patricia Hanson refused to prosecute those responsible for the election fraud. In at least one case, a resident at a residential care facility went with her family to her assigned polling place to cast a ballot but was told that she had already voted.

There are roughly 92,000 people in such facilities throughout Wisconsin, a sizable number given that Biden won the state by 20,682 votes.

Neither Wisconsin Elections Commission Administrator Meagan Wolfe, Town Clerk of Grand Chute Angie Cain, nor Outagamie County Circuit Court Clerk Barb Bocik responded to requests for comment.


Source

Explosive Hillary Situation and DNC Steele’s Dirty Dossier

Explosive Hillary Situation and DNC Steele’s Dirty Dossier

Hillary

Hillary Clinton isn’t happy to see her name in scandalous headlines, again. The thing that really cheeses her off is that she actually has to pay a fine. Well, her 2016 campaign does. It’s not much, not in comparison to what the DNC got stuck with, but there’s no way she can debunk the Federal Election Commission investigation with propaganda. The fertilizer is still flinging off the fan in her direction.

Hillary in hiding

Hillary Clinton won’t be making any mid-term election endorsement appearances for a while. Not since the Democratic National Committee and her 2016 presidential campaign “have agreed to collectively pay $113,000 in fines to settle a Federal Election Commission investigation.

The one into whether they violated campaign finance laws by hiring Christopher Steele, telling him what to find, then distributing his findings, using the FBI and DOJ as weapons along the way. They deny that the sun comes up in the east but they’re ponying up the cash.

This wasn’t just any little Election Commission investigation. The FEC found “probable cause” that Hillary and the DNC were illegally “misreporting the purpose of certain disbursements.” The attorney who filed the original complaint back in 2018 almost fell over when he opened his mail yesterday.

The FEC letter to Dan Backer, dated Tuesday, March 29, was notifying him of the outcome from his charges that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party illegally concealed “efforts to fund opposition research that eventually led to the so-called Steele dossier.

Backer was stunned. “This may well be the first time that Hillary Clinton — evidently one of the most corrupt politicians in American history — has actually been held legally accountable.” He had to sit down for that one.

I’m proud to see the FEC do its job for once.” He didn’t waste much time pounding out a press release on his Coolidge Reagan Foundation stationary. He posted it on their website, too.

Conciliation agreements

Washington Examiner was the first outlet to break the story. Documents posted publicly revealed the settlement deal, which is a whole lot more like a plea agreement, this time. Officially, they call it a “Conciliation agreement.” The DNC singed one and Hillary Clinton’s campaign signed the other.

The Democrats got stuck shelling out $105,000 while the campaign share of the damages was only 8k. It’s not the money, Democrats snarl. The important thing is that it makes all those nasty charges go away. Without admitting anything that might even smell like guilt, they proclaim they only wanted to settle the matter “expeditiously and to avoid further legal costs.” Especially with the midterms coming up rapidly and Joe Biden a babbling mess.

Language in the agreements clearly spells out in black and white that Hillary and her co-defendants “agreed that they will not further contest the commission’s findings, but they did not concede any wrongdoing.” Would everybody please stop talking about Christopher Steel and that dang dossier? They scream. In a lot more colorful language.

Spokesunits for “the DNC and Hillary for America did not immediately respond to requests for comment.” That’s because they allegedly turned their phones off and started drinking heavily.

Daniel Wessel, a DNC spin doctor, had the New York Times print a quick prescription to make Hillary Clinton’s image all better. “We settled aging and silly complaints from the 2016 election about ‘purpose descriptions’ in our F.E.C. report,” the weasel wrote.

The way Donald Trump sees it, “the alleged failure to disclose the research on him during the 2016 campaign was part of an effort by Clinton and the DNC” to “try and take down and illegally destroy your favorite President, me.

Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)