NO COMPLY … they need your consent … Who is the one?
(WOR) World Orders Review – March 12th, 2023
================
(world orders review)
================
WE WANT THE GALLOWS !!!
================
(WOR) https://www.bitchute.com/channel/tangentopolis/
================
(source) Staysane71 https://www.bitchute.com/channel/staysane71/
================
(WOR) World Orders Review – March 12th, 2023
================
(world orders review)
================
WE WANT THE GALLOWS !!!
================
(WOR) https://www.bitchute.com/channel/tangentopolis/
================
(source) Staysane71 https://www.bitchute.com/channel/staysane71/
================
YouTube has pulled yet another Project Veritas video.
The now-infamous video of Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer’s director of research and development in strategic operations and mRNA scientific planning, giving up information on #DirectedEvolution and Pfizer’s plan to continue profiting from the Covid vaccines is still available in full on Rumble.
As Tucker Carlson introduced the story Thursday night, he said:
Consider the story that did not break today. … In the 24 hours since Project Veritas posted this footage, it has been viewed more than 12 million times on Twitter. No other media outlet has covered this story at all. … [You’d think you could] just go online and find out about it. Well Google, the biggest search engine in the world, which has a monopoly on search in this country … appears to have gone out of its way to make it much more difficult for users to learn anything about the Pfizer executive pictured in the footage.
Apparently, Carlson’s sources found what so many others suspected immediately after the Project Veritas story broke — that Google appeared to mask and misdirect its search results almost immediately. That seems as clear a sign as any of the collusion between Big Pharma and Big Tech.
That’s not a far-fetched accusation. Consider The Wall Street Journal’s 2019 investigation, “How Google Interferes With Its Search Algorithms and Changes Your Results.” Among other things, they found, “Despite publicly denying doing so, Google keeps blacklists to remove certain sites or prevent others from surfacing in certain types of results.” Imagine how they’ve perfected this in the last few years.
By Friday evening, YouTube yanked Project Veritas’s Pfizer video, which had 800,000 views before it was censored. Luckily, it was still alive and well on Twitter with 20 million views.
After that, Rumble tweeted:
UPDATE: It seems like YouTube has removed @Project_Veritas’s video. In response, Rumble will hold the line against this outrageous censorship by keeping the video up and even featuring it on our homepage.
Censorship dies on Rumble.
Accusations of YouTube “censorship” have been rampant: from issues related to the Jan. 6 Committee and Covid vaccines, to climate change and public appearances by former President Donald Trump (presumably because he continues to question the results of the 2020 election; however, Google began censoring him long before that, supposedly for “false accusations” about Joe Biden.)
One has to wonder how long we are going to tolerate sources such as Google/YouTube deciding what we should or shouldn’t see. Freedom-loving Americans should be actively pursuing lawsuits to hold these monolithic companies accountable.
In this regard, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. should be commended for his work. Kennedy, along with multiple other plaintiffs, filed a lawsuit on Jan. 10 making antitrust and constitutional claims against corporate media outlets. The suit alleges the Trusted News Initiative (TNI), an industry partnership started in March 2020 by several of the world’s largest news organizations, partnered with Big Tech firms to collectively censor online news. Google/YouTube is one of the “core partners” of the TNI.
This is a huge step in the right direction. Yet even now, as many people are waking up to the fact that their friends and loved ones may have been harmed by mRNA shots marketed as “vaccines,” there is no great public backlash against YouTube for censoring questions or warnings that might have informed the public about the risks of the Covid jabs.
Large YouTube channels such as Russell Brand’s and Dr. John Campbell’s still have to speak vaguely about anything Covid-related to their millions of subscribers, just so they won’t get shut down — as if they lived under communist or fascist rule.
The bottom line is that Big Tech is running roughshod over us. Beginning with YouTube’s Chief Executive Officer Susan Wojcicki, and on up the ladder to Google and parent company Alphabet, headed by Sundar Pichai, it becomes clear that the looming elephant in the room has grown too big. Imagine a 21st-century, augmented reality version of “You can’t fight city hall.”
“Every single CEO supposedly for the last 20 years has been talking about the free and open internet,” explains Rumble CEO Chris Pavlovski. “They’ve been parading like the most important thing is to not regulate the internet and keep it free and open. Then all of a sudden in the last three or four years, everyone’s parading the opposite: Let’s censor it and let’s have a controlled internet. Never in my life could I ever have imagined that happening.”
In a Fox Nation special earlier this month that everyone concerned with censorship and free speech should watch, Pavlovski sat down with Carlson to discuss internet suppression and the birth of Rumble. It is an eye-opening explanation of how our digital information works, and of the uphill battle we face in taking back our First Amendment rights.
Pavlovski explained:
These companies all respectively have a monopoly on their certain division of the internet: Google is search, YouTube is video, Twitter is microblogging, and Facebook is social networking. … It’s a fun party for them. … Think about how big these companies are in comparison to the railroads and the tobacco companies in [the early 20th century] — these are even more powerful and have even more control than those companies did at that time. … So I don’t think they want to let that go. They’ve certainly abused their power.
And don’t think Pavlovski hasn’t already felt a backlash after his appearance on Fox Nation. Less than 10 days later, Rolling Stone ran a piece titled, “Far-Right Superstars Are Failing on Rumble. Who’s Winning?”
Rolling Stone is part of the Penske Media Corporation (PMC), a growing near-monopoly run by billionaire media tycoon Jay Penske. In July 2021, PMC brought in Noah Shachtman, former editor at The Daily Beast, to be Rolling Stone’s new editor-in-chief. A former Bill Clinton campaign staffer, it’s clear in which direction his bias lies.
In order to give Rumble a thorough dissing, Rolling Stone sought out E. Rosalie Li, “a public health scholar and disinformation researcher at Johns Hopkins University.” She also runs Hoaxlines, an organization that researches “media manipulation and unethical efforts to influence the public.” Li explains that Covid lockdowns “scared people who believed that the government was dangerous.” She then laments that there was “life-threatening” information posted on different platforms, and not enough of it was removed concerning Covid and the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. As a result, the masses fell victim to “conspiracy theories.”
The article then launches into a full-blown justification for censorship, quoting yet another misinformation expert, and explaining that as the masses peruse various internet platforms, they are becoming affiliated with like-minded believers. This, they claim, is dangerous because together they will morph into extremists spreading evil misinformation. And that can’t be allowed to happen.
It’s clear that with the rise of “misinformation experts” (there are currently 245 such code-worded job openings on Indeed), YouTube isn’t about to back down in its assault on free speech.
Luckily, there are some targeted lawsuits coming before the courts, including the Supreme Court, that will challenge Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This law “grants a liability shield to internet platforms that protects them from being held responsible for their users’ posts, while also allowing them to decide what stays up or comes down,” CNBC reports. These cases, outlined here, will help determine the bounds of free expression on the internet.
In the last few years, thanks to cancel culture and the seemingly unbridled power of Big Tech, we’ve come to understand how fragile free speech really is.
Project Veritas’ James O’Keefe recently copied YouTube’s CEO Wojcicki on a tweet to Elon Musk, asking him how much it would cost to buy YouTube. He’s got a point. In the short term, we may be left praying that Musk or other benevolent billionaires can come to the aid of saving the First Amendment. There is no future for America without it.
Authored by Robby Soave via Reason.com
For a broader analysis of the federal government’s pandemic-era efforts to suppress free speech—and whether they violated the First Amendment—see Reason‘s March 2023 cover story on the ramifications of these emails. This article provides screenshots of the emails themselves.
After Elon Musk took control of Twitter, he permitted several independent journalists to peruse the company’s previous communications with the FBI, the CDC, the White House, and government officials elsewhere. These disclosures, which have become known as the Twitter Files, reveal that government bureaucrats put substantial pressure on Twitter to restrict alleged misinformation relating to elections, Hunter Biden, and COVID-19.
The Facebook Files, which were obtained by Reason as a result of the state of Missouri’s lawsuit against the Biden administration, reveal that the CDC had substantial influence over what users were allowed to discuss on Meta’s platforms: Facebook and Instagram.
The messages reveal an environment where the CDC kept tabs on Meta’s moderation practices and regularly told the company what the agency wanted it to do.
For instance, in May 2021, CDC officials began routinely vetting claims about COVID-19 vaccines that had appeared on Facebook. The platform left it up to the federal government to determine which assertions were accurate.
Facebook’s moderator notes that some of the above claims “would already be violating”—an implicit admission that the CDC’s opinion on the other claims would be a deciding factor in whether the platform would restrict such content. Facebook was clearly a willing participant in this process; moderators repeatedly thanked the CDC for its “help in debunking.”
Claims vetted by the CDC included whether “COVID-19 is man-made.” The CDC told Facebook that it was “theoretically possible, but extremely unlikely.”
For months, it was Meta policy to prohibit users from asserting that the pandemic may have originated from a lab leak. The platform revised this policy around the same time that the above email exchange took place.
By July 2021, the CDC wasn’t just evaluating which claims it thought were false, but whether they could “cause harm.”
Then, in November, the Food and Drug Administration granted emergency authorization for children to receive Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. Meta proudly informed the CDC that it would remove false claims—”i.e. the COVID vaccine is not safe for kids”—from Facebook and Instagram. Meta also provided the CDC with a list of new claims about vaccines and asked whether the government thought they could “contribute to vaccine refusals.”
The CDC determined that this label applied to all such claims.
It’s important to consider the ramifications. Meta gave the CDC de facto power to police COVID-19 misinformation on the platforms; the CDC took the position that essentially any erroneous claim could contribute to vaccine hesitancy and cause social harm. This was a recipe for a vast silencing across Facebook and Instagram, at the federal government’s implicit behest.
Meta frequently gave the CDC lists of pandemic-related topics that had gone viral, seeking guidance on how to handle them. And the CDC informed Meta “to be on the lookout” for misinformation stemming from specific alleged misconceptions.
Meta also kept the CDC apprised of criticism of Anthony Fauci, the White House’s COVID-19 advisor and head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). One email warned the CDC that Facebook users were mocking Fauci for changing his mind about masking and double-masking. The CDC replied that this information was “very helpful.”
If the tone of Meta’s communications seems overly friendly, it’s worth noting that staffers viewed government employees at the CDC as their “colleagues.” In one email, Meta discussed providing said colleagues with access to a “reporting channel” for COVID-19 misinformation. The list of individuals with access included CDC staff, as well as employees at Reingold, a communications firm advising government health agencies.
This is just a snapshot of the messages exchanged between the CDC and Meta. They also had regular conference calls. The CDC was not the only arm of the federal government engaged in this work, of course: White House staffers also castigated Meta for not deplatforming alleged misinformation fast enough. President Joe Biden himself accused Facebook of “killing people” in July 2021.
One wonders whether these condemnations, from Biden and others in his administration—which included the specific threat of punitive regulation if demands for greater censorship were not met—influenced Meta’s decision to delegate COVID-19 content moderation to the CDC.
Header featured Image (edited) credit: CDC dir/Twitter grab
Emphasis added by (TLB) editors
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
U.S. intelligence agencies are obstructing congressional oversight by failing to disclose relevant information about Covid-19’s origins and potential connections to a Chinese bioweapons program, finds a new report from the Republicans on the House Permanent Select Committee On Intelligence. The HPSCI Republicans led by Rep. Brad Wenstrup of Ohio found “indications that SARS-CoV-2 may have been tied to China’s biological weapons research program and spilled over to the human population during a lab-related incident at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).”
U.S. intelligence agencies, along with corporate media and Big Tech, scrambled at Covid’s release to censor suggestions the virus leaked from a lab working on gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Publications such as The Federalist that reported on evidence for the lab leak theory were punished by internet censors.
Wenstrup confirmed during a press conference on Thursday that “right now, there’s no evidence that it came from nature.” He also said China’s communist government likely benefitted from misleading reports that Covid originated in a Chinese wet market, instead of from a government-run lab.
“Since the People’s Republic of China has not been transparent in sharing information, the IC is uniquely situated to provide relevant information. However, the IC has thus far failed to inform the public and failed to keep its Congressional oversight committees fully informed about what it knows,” the report states. “The IC owes the American people greater transparency on the information it already has and must be fully transparent to those in Congress with oversight responsibility.”
Instead of “adequately” addressing lab leak theories, the committee said various intelligence agencies — including the CIA, FBI, DHS, the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Defense Intelligence Agency, the Department of Energy’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, and the Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security — “downplayed the possibility that SARS-CoV2 was connected to China’s bioweapons program based in part on input from outside experts.”
Not only did intelligence bureaucrats fail to disclose to Congress which “experts” they relied on to reach that conclusion, they also omitted important information from the declassified version of their classified assessment.
These discrepancies, the committee stated, “could have been shared without damaging national security” but were not supplied. Even after “dozens” of rounds of congressional demands, intelligence agencies failed to “disclose to the public its confidence level regarding this bioweapons assessment.” They also “failed to correct claims” in accordance with new information that “undermined a key assertion in the report.”
“These omissions likely skewed the public’s understanding of key issues and deepened mistrust,” the committee noted.
The committee wants its report to encourage intelligence agencies to explore the ties between communist China’s weapons program and Covid-19. If those agencies continue to stonewall, the HPSCI says it welcomes a report from the Government Accountability Office.
“We have this responsibility to protect our national security and our national health,” Wenstrup told reporters. “And that’s why we’re looking into things. If something doesn’t add up, we have the responsibility on behalf of the American people to raise the issues so that we hope to be able to get people in front of us that would explain the differences between the two reports.”
Wenstrup also said that the committee plans to use its subpoena power if intelligence agencies refuse to disclose why there are discrepancies between the classified and unclassified reports.
Jordan Boyd is a staff writer at The Federalist and co-producer of The Federalist Radio Hour. Her work has also been featured in The Daily Wire and Fox News. Jordan graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow her on Twitter @jordanboydtx.
“The Masters of Evil Terrorize Global Citizens by Spraying Down Cities and Towns with Aerosolized Biosynthetic Ai Nanoweapons called Spike Proteins.” – Karen Kingston
by Dr. Ariyana Love
Recently I teamed up with the legendary Dr. Robert O. Young for a mega bombshell reveal about the mRNA vectors in COVID-19 vaccines.
Dr. Young is a senior scientific researcher who’s been analyzing body fluids with specialized lab equipment for over 40 years. I am a second generation Naturopathic Doctor and a 13-year veteran journalist and researcher. Like me, Dr. Young is a targeted individual.
After providing a proven cure for cancer in 1996, Dr. Young fell under attack by the Luciferian cabal who’s been hell bent on smearing his good name ever since. I have been targeted by the Izraeli state since 2017 who’ve been hell bent on smearing my good name with accusations of “racism”.
Dr. Young and I share the same views on medicine and how the body system works to heal itself from, toxic poisoning and injury. So we decided to discuss the root cause of disease and address the increase of parasitic infestation Dr. Young is seeing in clients, from all over the world. Dr. Young gives chilling evidence of unprecedented parasitic infestations in humans, of which he’s not seen in his entire career. He told that parasites are now showing up in 90% of the blood of VAXXed and non-VAXXed individuals alike.
PLEASE WATCH: Part 1 on the Root Cause Of Disease and GMO parasites:
We followed up with a second broadcast for a patent review on the messenger RNA vectors being genetically modified parasites. These GMO parasites are mRNA vectors of deadly synthetic biology that’s being used by Moderna, Pfizer, Novavax, Janssen (J&J), Oxford, and more, to transform the human genome and turn humans into synthetic biology. That’s right, pharmaceutical companies are now using deadly parasites as mRNA vectors for delivering artificial genetic sequences into the human genome through the COVID “vaccination”.
PLEASE WATCH: MEGA BOMBS! Deadly GMO Parasites are the mRNA Vectors: Patent Review with Dr. Young and Dr. Love
Since our great reveal on September 28th, Pfizer whistleblower Karen Kingston boldly stepped forward and made an appearance on Stew Peters Show, delivering more bombshell information. She eloquently tied together all aspects of this biological attack against humanity, including the fact that these GMO parasites and mRNA carriers were created with the intention of hooking humans up to AI. Incidentally, Karen Kingston is also a targeted individual.
PART 1: PROOF COVID Is A PARASITE; Biotech Analyst Has PROOF COVID & Vaxx Are Biosynthetic Parasites
PART 2: PROOF COVID Is A Nano-weapon PARASITE; Biotech Analyst Has PROOF COVID & Vaxx Are Biosynthetic Parasites
Please also review Karen Kingston’s accompanying article to see additional shocking evidence of this biological assault: Part 1: Dismantling the the Deceptions of the COVID-19 Story.
SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2
There are hundreds of SEQ ID NO’s contained within the COVID serums. We are going to examine just the first two.
SEQ ID NO: 1 is patented and owned by the Pirbright Institute which is owned by Bill & Melinda Gates. It contains polypeptides or amino acid sequences. These are artificial proteins containing synthetic genetic sequences, in other words it’s synthetic biology. These artificial genetic sequences are messenger RNA.
SEQ ID No: 1 is “VACCINE” Patent #20130216569.
The SEQ ID NO: 1 Patent #20130216569 explicitly states that it contains the following deadly protozoan parasite pathogens; Toxoplasma Gondii, Eimeria, Plasmodium, and Theileria.
SEQ ID NO: 2 is owned by Boston Biomedical Research Institute and receives significant funding from the NIH, thus Anthony Fauci. SEQ ID NO: 2 is also synthetic mRNA proteins designed to target and prevent “embryo implantation” in mammals. FYI, humans are classified as mammals.
Embryo implantation is the moment when the fertilized egg is detached from its sheath (zona pellucida), adhered to the endometrium and anchored to it to begin its intrauterine development. Embryo implantation occurs between 5 and 6 days after fertilization. Essentially, SEQ ID NO: 1 aborts embryonic development within the first few days of conception.
SEQ ID NO: 1 can be found within the Pfizer, Moderna, Novavax, Janssen (J&J), Oxford and more, in the COVID jab patents. SEQ ID NO: 2 is found in Moderna, Pfizer and Novavax and more.
PFIZER
Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine Patent #WO2021213945A1 contains both SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2, deadly protozoan parasites and birth control without Informed Consent.
MODERNA
Moderna Sars-cov-2 mRNA Domain Vaccines Patent #WO2021159040A2 contains SEQ ID NO: 2 birth control without Informed Consent.
Moderna Delivery and Formulation of Engineered Nuclei Acids Vaccine Patent #US10898574B2 contains SEQ ID NO: 1, with deadly protozoan parasites without Informed Consent.
NOVAVAX
Novavax Coronavirus Vaccine Formulations Patent #US20210228709A1 contains both SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2 thus it contains both birth control and deadly protozoan parasites without Informed Consent.
JANSSEN (J&J)
Janssen (J&J) Compositions and Methods for Preventing and Treating Coronavirus Infection-SARS-Cov-2 Vaccines Patent #WO2021155323A1 contains SEQ ID NO: 1 with deadly protozoan parasites.
OXFORD
Oxford Compositions and Methods For Inducing An Immune Response Vaccine Patent #WO2021181100A1 contains SEQ ID NO: 1 with deadly protozoan parasites.
PARASITES AS mRNA VECTORS
This BMC study verify’s that deadly parasites were indeed developed as messenger RNA carriers by the World Health Organization, in 2018. The most deadly of the 5 Malaria parasites, Plasmodium falciparum, the Toxoplasma gondii, the Trypanosoma cruzi and the Plasmodium spp. in particular, are all mentioned as mRNA vector exports for vaccines in mammal (human) cells.
This illustration shows the GMO parasite mRNA vectors in brown squiggly lines with a round head. You can see there are things attached to the parasites and a coil at the parasites tail to represent the genetic sequence. This graph outlines how the parasites enter the cell membrane through ruptured holes and make their way to the cell nucleus where it delivers the mRNA and genetic changes are made to the cellular DNA.
Below is a recent lab photo by Dr. Robert Young demonstrating parasites infesting a human cell.
Follow Dr. Robert Young’s work here.
Follow Dr. Ariyana Love’s Telegram channel here.
For information on how you can detox and fortify your immune system, please schedule a consultation with Dr. Love, here.
Please consider donating to Dr. Love’s research, here.
