Twitter sale on hold to Musk due to massive numbers of bot users

(Natural News) His plan to buy Twitter is now on hold after billionaire Elon Musk came to the conclusion that most of Twitter is just artificial intelligence (AI) robots posing as human users.

Based on his team’s assessment, Musk believes that up to 90 percent of Twitter’s entire platform is fake. The vast majority of its “daily users,” it appears, are automated spam bots that the tech giant uses to induce mass formation psychosis and other forms of brainwashing.

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is likely behind the AI bot front on Twitter. These same spam bots are also likely present on other social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram as well.

“After all, it’s no secret that the powers that be are conducting military-grade psy-ops on the public,” writes Vince Quill for WeLoveTrump.com. (Related: Conservatives have reportedly been celebrating the news that Musk is planning to buy Twitter.)

“All of us have at one point or another encountered bots, sometimes it was obvious, other times not so much, but 90% of the users being bots is just beyond the pale.”

Twitter’s bot check sample size is only 100 users, Musk reveals

What this means, of course, is that Twitter itself, along with the rest of Big Tech, is little more than a social engineering tool to manipulate and brainwash the masses into believing the scripted reality that psychopaths are using for control.

If Musk can prove that Twitter is mostly fake, he will likely be able to purchase the company for a much smaller amount than his initial bid. The revelations that come out of all this will also likely expose Twitter for the fraud that it has long been.

On May 13, Musk tweeted that he was going to take a random sampling of users to try to come up with an estimate for the number of bots on Twitter. The sample size he used was 100, which is apparently what Twitter uses internally for metrics purposes.

“Twitter legal just called to complain that I violated their NDA (non-disclosure agreement) by revealing the bot check sample size is 100!” Musk wrote. “This actually happened.”

According to Twitter, less than 5 percent of its platform is bots, but Musk believes otherwise. Who is correct? And more importantly, will the full truth ever be revealed, leading to justice on the matter?

So far, Twitter has failed to produce any actual evidence to back its claim that less than 5 percent of the platform is fake. And Musk still wants to know: Where’s the evidence?

Former President Donald Trump sent a message to his followers about the issue, stating that Musk will be paying too much for Twitter if he goes with his original bid because Twitter “is a company largely based on BOTS or Spam Accounts,” Trump wrote.

“Fake anyone?” he added. “By the time you get rid of them, if that can even be done, what do you have? Not much? If it weren’t for the ridiculous Billion Dollar breakup fee, Elon would have already been long gone.”

“Just my opinion,” Trump added, proceeding to plug his own platform, “but Truth Social is MUCH better than Twitter and is absolutely exploding, incredible engagement!”

In the comment section at WeLoveTrump.com, someone wrote that he was suspended from Twitter for tweeting about how ivermectin is a safe and effective remedy for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19).

“Twitter is another DARPA creation,” wrote another. “It is controlled by the government for the government. We are given the illusion of freedom and fair and open markets which is not true by a long shot.”

More related news coverage about Musk, Twitter, and Big Tech can be found at Technocrats.news.

Sources for this article include:

WeLoveTrump.com

NaturalNews.com

Source

The Tyranny of the Pandemic Treaty

Australia and other nations will become puppet states of the WHO and the WEF.

There is worldwide outrage and concern about the latest attempt at globalist power grabs which will turn the concept of national sovereignty into a sick joke. The plan to revise the International Health Regulations (IHR) of the World Health Organization (WHO) is one of the biggest threats we face in terms of freedom and democracy. I recently reported on this in a detailed article.

There is so much more that can be said about this monstrous and diabolical plot that more articles are needed. This is especially the case since the big three parties here — Libs, Labor and the Greens — all seem to be quite happy about ceding authority to the WHO, and to Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF), and to globalists like Bill Gates who is up to his ears in backing both organisations.

Botched by Biden

Many freedom fighters from around the globe have voiced their concerns about this frightening move by the WHO. Let me begin with Mat Staver of the US-based Liberty Counsel. He said this in part about this nefarious initiative:

Recognizing the IHR’s threat to U.S. sovereignty, former President Donald Trump stopped sending U.S. taxpayer dollars to WHO and began the process of pulling America out of the U.N. organization. Globalist billionaire Bill Gates countered by pledging to replace the lost American income to the tune of 250 million dollars.

Upon taking office, Joe Biden reversed President Trump and rejoined the so-called “global authority.” Now he wants to cede sovereignty to the WHO, which is ideologically aligned with Communist China and Bill Gates. But it was not enough for Biden to simply rejoin WHO. Biden is actively trying to cede more of America’s sovereignty to a U.N. globalist body.

On January 18, the Biden administration delivered 13 pages of proposed changes to WHO’s IHR charter. Biden did not consult Congress. In fact, Americans would not even know about the proposed amendments if it had not been for an independent researcher who discovered the scheme and raised an alarm on April 12.

WHO member states will vote on Biden’s proposed amendments NEXT WEEK, May 22-28. Because the U.S. already signed on to the IHR agreement in 2005, the U.S. Senate is not required to approve IHR amendments. It will be the globalists’ dream and every Americans’ nightmare. One of the shocking amendments Biden put forward adds nearly an entire new chapter (article 53) to the IHR agreement, establishing a heretofore nonexistent “Compliance Committee.”

Upon threat of being dragged to the World Court’s arbitration unit, where steep fines and sanctions can be imposed, member states are required to report IHR compliance measures to the “Compliance Committee,” which will “monitor” each nation’s progress with the IHR directives. The Committee, for its part, “shall strive to make its recommendations on the basis of consensus,” but consensus is not required to force WHO’s will on a member state.

Among the many other changes the Biden administration put forward is a provision that allows WHO’s director-general to appoint “relevant intergovernmental organizations or nongovernmental organizations in official relations with WHO to designate representatives.” Bill Gates is WHO’s second-highest funder, exceeded only by the United States. The Gates Foundation regularly donates up to 500 million per year to the globalist society. You can bet Gates or his surrogate will sit on that committee!

Slow-Mo & Albo

Here in Australia, Alexandra Marshall from the Australian Spectator has written some very important pieces on all this. In one article from last week she wrote:

The ‘New Normal’ of medical fascism is coming regardless of how Australians vote at the federal election. Having acquired a taste for globalised control during the Covid pandemic, the World Health Organisation has teamed up with vaccine manufacturers, philanthropic billionaires, and power-crazed world leaders to create a ‘Global Pandemic Treaty’ in Geneva. It is set to form part of the ‘one health’ approach proposed by the WHO and has been pitched by its creators as a way to overcome the inconvenient battle between — as they put it — globalism and statism…

In June of 2021, Scott Morrison commented on the proposed treaty, saying: “It’s essential that we strengthen global (disease) surveillance and provide the World Health Organisation with the authority and the capacity to do this important job for all the peoples of the world. If we are to deliver on this ambitious reform agenda, then we must work together and put other issues aside.”

Yes, the same Prime Minister who attempted to escape criticism by saying ‘there’s no such thing as vaccine mandates’ is champing at the bit to grant the WHO absolute control over the health choices of Australian citizens. It amounts to extending similar emergency powers to the WHO that Daniel Andrews gifted himself in Victoria — except Australians can’t vote the WHO out of power. As for Labor, they have laid down at the feet of the WHO, tummies up and paws in the air like dogs waiting for a rub…

If Scott Morrison or Anthony Albanese sign this treaty, it represents a seismic shift in everything we thought we knew about democracy. It is likely the treaty will make it possible for a foreign bureaucracy with unacceptably close ties to China to call the shots — literally — on global public health. Universal healthcare was meant to be a voluntary safety net — not a stepping stone to international socialism or the dissolution of body autonomy. That said, the wheels are already falling off, with questions being raised about whether it will be a ‘treaty’ in the legal sense after parts of the WHO Constitution were re-worded.

The vote for this dangerous Pandemic Treaty will be held in Geneva on May 22-28. Whoever the next Prime Minister of Australia is, they will be there with bells on, ready to sign and absolve themselves of the ‘bother’ of responsibility. It is a dream come true for weak leaders who would love nothing better than to let the blame for the next pandemic and the accompanying citizen outrage rest safely offshore.

In a newer piece, she writes:

It beggars belief. After two and a half years in which a cohort of left-leaning politicians, elite bureaucrats, over-zealous health officials and opportunistic drug manufacturers cajoled, harangued, bullied and used police brutality to force many of us into locking ourselves down for months on end in our homes, closing our children’s schools, abandoning our elderly and frail relatives to suffer alone without family affection, losing our jobs, bankrupting our businesses, trashing our investments, compromising our mental health, wearing largely pointless masks and taking unproven medical treatments frequently against our better judgement, those most responsible for the authoritarian excesses and abuses of the Covid-19 era now wish to further encourage such activities with a World Health Organisation Global Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Treaty. 194 nations, including our own, are said to intend ratifying a series of Biden administration ‘amendments’ supporting such a treaty at a special meeting of the World Health Assembly this week in Geneva…

The pandemic and its aftermath have taught us one invaluable lesson: too much power in the hands of unelected officials and unaccountable bureaucracies only results in bad, even deadly, decision-making. It is increasingly clear that nations such as Sweden and states such as Florida which took a more sceptical or nuanced approach to implementing strict Covid restrictions — trusting in the choices of individuals rather than imposing draconian, one-size-fits-all measures from on high — have fared certainly no worse and sometimes even better than others. On excess mortalities over the Covid period, for example, Sweden sits near the bottom of the European tally…

The understandable fear of many is that if the aspirations of those behind this treaty and its amendments are realised — gifting the WHO the legal power to impose at will pandemic restrictions of their own design upon any nation, state or community — then when the next pandemic comes around we could be looking at Dan Andrews-style lockdowns and police brutality being imposed on us willy-nilly by an unelected global authority.

Get Out Now

Finally, One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts said this in part about this ominous threat:

The police and armed forces have already demonstrated their support for these measures during COVID. One Nation strongly opposes the ceding of our sovereignty to the UN and WHO. Unelected, unrepresentative foreign bureaucrats should not have the power to lock Australia down and force Australians to undergo medical procedures.

The Government should never have the power to force a medical procedure without your consent, an unelected international organisation certainly should not. This brazen proposal shows the WHO is not fit for purpose, cannot be trusted and does not operate with Australia’s sovereign interests in mind. Australia must immediately exit the WHO and maintain our sovereignty.

It is vital that every Australian does at least two things to fight this totalitarian evil. One, vote very carefully this Saturday in our national election. The major parties cannot be trusted on these matters. Two, contact your political representatives and tell them in no uncertain terms that we do not want Australia to become a mere puppet state of the globalists, of Gates, of WHO, of the UN, and of the WEF.

Three video resources

In this 35-minute video, George Christensen and Senator Malcolm Roberts discuss the Pandemic Treaty, Digital ID and the Great Reset:

And here is a 6-minute video on the WHO treaty by Rebel News:

Glenn Beck also has a 6-minute video on this:

Sign the petition

Here is a petition you can sign and share. It says in part:

The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level. 194 member states representing 99% of the world’s population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.

This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations.

___

Originally published at CultureWatch.

Thank the Source

Handwritten Notes From 2017 Show FBI Agents Mislead DOJ On The Trump-Russia Investigation

Handwritten Notes From 2017 Show FBI Agents Mislead DOJ On The Trump-Russia Investigation

Hillary Clinton’s campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann is currently on trial for lying to the FBI about his role in pushing data pertaining to alleged communications between Trump and the Russian Alfa Bank. According to Special Counsel John Durham, Sussmann lied when he brought that data to the FBI’s General Counsel James Baker as part of the Clinton campaign’s efforts to trigger an FBI investigation of her opponent, Donald Trump. Specifically, Sussmann allegedly wrote Baker a text message claiming he was not representing anyone in providing the information when, in fact, he was representing the Clinton campaign.

In a surprising move, Sussmann’s defense team last week disclosed three sets of handwritten Department of Justice (DOJ) notes of a March 6, 2017 meeting between high-ranking DOJ and FBI officials. Durham gave the notes written by DOJ officials Tashina Gauhar, Mary McCord, and Scott Schools to Sussmann’s team as part of Durham’s discovery obligations.

While the notes contain a one-line hearsay suggestion that may cast doubt on Sussmann’s earlier claim that he was not representing anyone, their broader significance lies in what they reveal about the FBI’s strategy in the months leading up to the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller in May 2017.

In fact, the notes are the very first documents to have been released to the public that show what the FBI was telling the DOJ about the predication and status of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation only two weeks before FBI Director James Comey’s shock announcement to the House Intelligence Committee on March 20, 2017, that the Trump campaign was being investigated by the FBI for ties to the Kremlin. It was Comey’s announcement that ultimately led to the appointment of Mueller.

The DOJ had a legal responsibility to supervise the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation, which, as a “sensitive matter,” placed special oversight and due diligence obligations on the DOJ and additional reporting and due diligence obligations on the FBI. The March 6 meeting was a key milestone in those due diligence obligations.

The FBI was represented at the meeting by three of its top officials: Deputy Director Andy McCabe, Counterintelligence Executive Assistant Director Bill Priestap, and Counterintelligence Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok. The DOJ was also represented by top-level officials, led by Acting Attorney General Dana Boente. Boente was taking the place of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who had recused himself only four days previously.

The notes reveal a pattern of repeated lies and omissions by FBI leadership to DOJ officials that concealed the dramatic deterioration of the predicate for the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. As the predication deteriorated, so too was the purported justification for Comey’s public reveal of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.

The significance of the FBI’s lies was accentuated this week at Sussmann’s trial when Scott Hellman, an FBI cyber analyst, testified that he knew right away in September 2016 that Sussmann’s data did not suggest any covert communications between Trump and Russia. Hellman added that he wondered if the person who put together the data was suffering from a mental disability.

Hellman’s testimony is the clearest evidence yet that the FBI knew from the start that one of the two major components of the Trump Russia collusion narrative – the Alfa Bank data – was false. As the March 6 notes show, they concealed this fact from their DOJ superiors.

The other major component of the investigation was the Steele dossier. The FBI knew from a January 2017 interview of Igor Danchenko, Christopher Steele’s “Primary Sub-Source” through whom all the allegations in the Steele dossier were originated or channeled, that the dossier too was false.

Danchenko’s most shocking revelation to the FBI was that he had never met Sergei Millian, the attributed source for the Steele dossier’s most inflammatory claims, including the allegation that there was a “well-developed conspiracy of cooperation” between Trump and the Kremlin, that Russia passed hacked Democratic National Committee emails to WikiLeaks, as well as the infamous Moscow pee tape story.

Danchenko, although a Russian national, was not “Russian-based,” as the FBI was claiming, but had lived and worked in Washington, D.C. for more than a decade, including at the Brookings Institute. Fiona Hill, a Brookings Institute stalwart, was a key supporter of Danchenko’s and had even introduced him to Steele in 2011. In 2016, Hill introduced Danchenko to former Hillary Clinton aide Charles Dolan. Danchenko would later use Dolan as a source for a number of his dossier claims.

Beyond the fact that Millian could not have been a source for the dossier, the FBI also learned from Danchenko that the dossier stories were based on bar talk and innuendo (Danchenko has since been charged by Durham with lying to the FBI about his sources).

The FBI appears to have concealed these matters from the DOJ. In fact, it does not appear from the March 6 notes that the FBI ever mentioned Danchenko. Despite Danchenko’s disavowal of the dossier as of March 6, it remained as the main component of the overall Crossfire Hurricane investigation, including being the basis of two Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants against Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

The March 6 notes also reveal that FBI leadership told DOJ officials that the Page FISA application had been “fruitful” even though it had turned up nothing of significance. Page was never charged with, or even accused of, any offense and is now suing the DOJ for damages.

FBI leadership also pushed the narrative on their DOJ counterparts that the dossier was “CROWN reporting,” implying that the dossier was an official United Kingdom intelligence product when it was actually made-up stories and gossip and paid for by the Clinton campaign – a fact the FBI knew from their Danchenko interview.

The notes cite “CROWN reporting” in connection with collusion allegations on at least two occasions. In Strzok’s exposition of the status of Page’s case, the notes indicate that Strzok referred to “Crown source reporting” as a key element in the Page FISA warrant. This was already known from unredacted portions of the FISA applications that were publicly disclosed in 2020. However, what was not known was that the FBI also lied internally about these facts to their DOJ supervisors.

Similarly, the March 6 notes indicate that, in connection with the status of the Manafort case, Strzok had reported that, based on “CROWN reporting,” the FBI had “looked at [the Republican] convention” and allegations that the Trump campaign had caused the convention to “soften stance on Crimea and NATO” in exchange for “Russian energy stocks.”

In fact, there is no reference to allegations about Crimea or NATO in Steele’s dossier. Strzok attributed these false accusations to “CROWN reporting,” presumably to lend weight to them with his DOJ superiors.

With respect to “Russian energy stocks,” the dossier includes a false reference to Page receiving a brokerage fee for the sale of a Russian energy company but this allegation is not related to the convention but to the lifting of sanctions. Again, Strzok falsely portrayed this as having something to do with the Republican Party’s convention.

Additionally, the notes show that lead agent Strzok also lied to DOJ officials about the opening of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. Strzok claimed the investigation was triggered by Trump when he jokingly asked Russia to publish Clinton’s missing 30,000 emails. It was Trump’s joke which, according to Strzok, caused the Australian diplomat to provide his tip about Trump aide George Papadopoulos to the U.S. embassy in London.

In truth, the diplomat provided his tip before Trump made the joke. Another fact that the FBI concealed in respect of the opening of Crossfire Hurricane was that their theory that Papadopoulos had advanced knowledge of the DNC hack was logically impossible. When Papadopoulos met the Australian diplomat on May 10, 2016, most of the hacked DNC emails hadn’t even been written yet.

Ironically, in analyzing why the FBI leadership felt compelled to brazenly lie to their DOJ counterparts, it appears that their hand was forced by Trump himself. Just two days before the FBI-DOJ meeting, on March 4, 2017, Trump tweeted he had found out that President Obama had wiretapped Trump at Trump Tower. Trump’s tweet was in an apparent reference to radio host Mark Levin, who reported on his show on March 2 that Trump campaign aides had been the subject of FISA warrants.

In a number of instances, the March 6 meeting notes reflect the FBI leadership’s befuddlement as to how much Trump knew about the FBI’s investigation of him. McCabe is cited repeatedly as having said that the FBI was investigating what was behind Trump’s tweet.

In reality, Trump’s tweet probably just restated what Levin had said. But the fact that the FBI did not know how much Trump knew meant FBI leadership had a choice to make. They could either downplay the investigation with a view to wrapping it up or they could double down even though they had not found any incriminating evidence.

They chose to double down, with Comey going on offense in the immediate aftermath of the March 6 meeting. Aside from giving narrative-shaping briefings to congressional leaders, Comey publicly disclosed the existence of the Trump Russia investigation, ensuring a media frenzy. That frenzy ultimately led to the appointment of Mueller on May 17, 2017.

While we have become accustomed to false statements charges being filed against Trump associates such as Roger Stone, Papadopoulos, and Michael Flynn, those same charges are also applicable to false statements or concealment of material facts by FBI officials to DOJ officials in the conduct of their supervision of FBI investigations.

It is perplexing that no one within the FBI has been held accountable for the many lies told at the March 6 meeting. This fact is all the more perplexing as it was Durham who originally turned over the March 6 notes to Sussmann’s defense team.

Former Attorney General William Barr had earlier turned down the opportunity to charge McCabe with lying during an internal FBI investigation of a leak related to the Hillary Clinton email investigation. McCabe had authorized the leak but lied about it. McCabe later apologized for lying to agents who were investigating the leak.

While Barr claimed it was a judgment call not to prosecute McCabe, his lies must now properly be seen in light of the FBI’s and his own pattern of lies, as documented in the March 6 notes. While the notes were only publicly released last week, they have been available to Barr, Durham and the DOJ for much longer. Yet no action was taken.

Crucially, public release of the notes came after the five-year statute of limitations had lapsed in March of this year. The question is why the DOJ — and Durham in particular — gave the FBI a free pass. The uncomfortable answer may be that, as has been suspected for a while, Durham’s authority is effectively limited to private actors such as Sussmann and Danchenko and does not extend to public officials such as McCabe and Strzok.


Hans Mahncke is in-house counsel at a global business advisory firm. He holds LL.B., LL.M. and Ph.D. degrees in law. He is the author of numerous law books and his research has been published in a range of international journals. Stephen McIntyre is a semi-retired mining consultant specializing in statistical analysis. He holds a B.Sc. degree from the University of Toronto and a PPE degree from Oxford. Steve is known as the founder and editor of Climate Audit, a website devoted to the analysis and discussion of climate data.

Source

Pennsylvania’s GOP Senate Primary Too Close To Call As Counting Snafus Mount

Pennsylvania’s GOP Senate Primary Too Close To Call As Counting Snafus Mount

As problems mount with ballot counting and other election glitches, a recount in the Pennsylvania U.S. Senate primary appears imminent for Republican candidates Mehmet Oz and David McCormick, who both received at least 31 percent of the state’s votes on Tuesday.

As of Wednesday morning, the race between former President Donald Trump’s pick, Oz, and former George W. Bush administration official, McCormick, was too close to call. Both candidates, who beat out a long list of contenders including underdog candidate Kathy Barnette, indicated disappointment on Tuesday night that election results were not yet finalized but also expressed optimism that a victory is near.

“So, we’re not going to have a result tonight. When all the votes are tallied, I’m confident we’ll win,” Oz said. “We are making a ferocious charge, but when it’s this close, what else do you expect?”

“Unfortunately, we’re not going to have resolution tonight, but we can see the path ahead, we can see victory ahead, and it’s all because of you,” McCormick said in an address to his supporters.

One day after voters cast their in-person ballots, results in the state have been muddled and delayed by slow counting and technological failures.

In Lancaster County, one of the state’s largest population centers, a printing error resulted in ID codes being mislabeled on 22,000 mail-in ballots. Thanks to the mishap, a manual redo is required for more than two-thirds of the affected ballots, meaning full results for that county could be delayed a few days.

“About 22,000 mail ballots were printed by the print vendor with the incorrect code and could not be read by the county’s scanners. County election officials will re-mark the ballots by hand and then scan them. This is allowed under PA law. It is likely to take county officials a few days,” the Pennsylvania secretary of state’s office said in a statement.

Voters in Berks County, home to Reading, were allowed to cast provisional ballots during extended poll hours late Tuesday night after the county reported issues with its new electronic poll books.

“The County of Berks is aware of an issue impacting the new electronic pollbooks and is distributing backup paper pollbooks to polls throughout the county. The details behind the issue will be reviewed after Election Day and a full and detailed explanation will be provided at that time,” Stephanie Weaver, public relations officer for the county, said in a statement.

As of Wednesday, tens of thousands of mail-in ballots, which amounts to 5 percent of the vote tally, were still waiting to be counted.

Whichever candidate eventually wins the GOP Senate primary will face off in November with Pennsylvania’s Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, who suffered a stroke four days before election day and received a pacemaker on Tuesday. He also once wrongly chased down an unarmed black jogger and held him up with a shotgun after hearing nearby gunshots.


Jordan Boyd is a staff writer at The Federalist and co-producer of The Federalist Radio Hour. Her work has also been featured in The Daily Wire and Fox News. Jordan graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow her on Twitter @jordanboydtx.

Source

Super Fragile Liberal Chick – Spoofing The New Czar Of Truth To Mary Poppins

Super Fragile Liberal Chick – Spoofing The New Czar Of Truth To Mary Poppins


Super Fragile Liberal Chick – Spoofing The New Czar Of Truth To Mary Poppins

Intro by: Roger Landry (TLB)

Let me start this off by thanking a longtime friend and TLB Project Contributor Tony Olson for masterminding what you are about to see. Tony has made many outstanding contributions to this project over the years and for this we are very appreciative. Over the last couple of years Tony has focused more on his music, and less on the ever devolving political scenario … until now. And he pops back in with an ‘eye popping bang’ !!!

The Talent behind the camera and voice (on multiple occasions) is Allison Thompson, who’s outstanding performance is appreciated!

•••• 

Tony’s latest satire project centers on our new Director of the Biden Administration’s “Disinformation Governance Board“ (Ministry of Truth), Nina Jankowicz. In the first (Twitter) video below she pours out her heart to enlighten us to her deepest thoughts … to the tune of Mary Poppins Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious … Or in her case should the word actually be spelled Stupidcalifragilisticexpialidocious … since we are all very aware of her stints of devout disinformation concerning the Hunter Biden Laptop, and Trumps Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax? In either case Nina is highly deserving of what Tony delivers with the brilliant help of Allison.

Here is the spark that set Tony off (LOL):

 ••••

And here is the resulting *itch slap of ultimate satire by one who shows no mercy … where none is deserved … Listen Up:

••••

Song Lyrics

Title: Super Fragile Liberal Chick

(Sung to the tune of Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious)

I’m a …

Super fragile liberal chick with Trump-induced psychosis

Trying to dumb our people down through cranial osmosis

Even people on the left will have to hold their noses

Super fragile liberal chick with Trump-induced psychosis

Um-dittle-ittl-ittl I’m onna lie

Um-dittle-ittl-ittl I’m onna lie

Once, we kept the facts at bay … controlling speech on Twitter

But, Elon took that all away, That really made us bitter

So, we formed a ministry protecting all our minions

Now, well have to save the world From differing opinions

Super fragile liberal chick with Trump-induced psychosis

Trying to dumb our people down Through cranial osmosis

Even people on the left will have to hold their noses

Super fragile liberal chick with Trump-induced psychosis

••••

Authored by: Tony Olson

Performed by: Allison Thompson

Enough said …

••••

Related articles to help you to understand:

Witness The Comical Buffoonery Of Biden’s New Disinformation Czarina

Biden’s New ‘Disinfo’ Queen Goes Full ‘Libs Of TikTok’ [Video]

Senator Demands Biden Scrap Creepy ‘Disinformation’ Unit

The People Behind DHS’s Orwellian “Disinformation Governance Board”

20 Attorney Generals demand Mayorkas disband Disinformation Board

‘Ministry Of Truth’ Tsar: Parents Concerned About CRT Are “Disinformers”

DisInfo Czar Demands Power to Edit People’s Tweets [Video]

‘Ministry of Truth’ Previously Compared Free Speech to “Fairy Dust”

••••

Another Brilliant Ditty by Tony Olson and Sung by Allison Thompson:

Hillary Clinton sings “My Favorite Excuses”

••••

Read a few more of Tony’s Great Contributions

••••

About Tony Olson: Tony is an American journalist, and bestselling author. His book SPIN GAME: Exposing Political Lies And Tactics was an Amazon Top Ten Bestseller. In addition to his great articles Tony also authored Twas The Night Before Inauguration” and Ode to Liberal Lunacy, as well as other outstanding satirical poems that can be found on The Liberty Beacon. Tony currently lives in Boise, Idaho.

••••

About the Author: Roger Landry (TLB) spent about three decades of his adult life either in, or working for the military, with about two decades working directly for the Military Industrial Complex facilitating DOD contracts. His awakening to Political, Economic, and Health realities was about twelve short years ago. Since that time he has founded The Liberty Beacon Project (TLB) consisting of a half dozen proprietary global websites, media projects and partner websites across the planet. He contributes regularly to multiple forums both in and outside of TLB Project. Most of his work can be found on the TLB Flagship website TheLibertyBeacon.com

Image Credit: Photos in the Featured Image (top) – Nina Jankowicz on Cyber Security at the U.S. Embassy Vienna 2019-10-10 -a (cropped) – Public Domain & Mary Poppins by Aline Dassel – Pixabay

••••

Click on the image below to visit site:

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

NY POST Editorial Board to PA Republicans: Dump Barnette

NY POST Editorial Board to PA Republicans: Dump Barnette

The New York Post Editorial Board published an article calling on Republican voters in Pennsylvania to reject Senate candidate Kathy Barnette.

Titled “Pennsylvania GOP voters should kick Kathy Barnette to the curb“the New York Post Editorial Board criticized the candidate’s electability in the general election, beginning by remarking, “Keystone State Republican voters should think twice before pulling the lever for Kathy Barnette.”

The article asserted that “the very factors that propelled her rise in the primary would kneecap her in the general.”

The NY Post Editorial Board writes that GOP contenders Dr. Mehmet Oz and ex-Bridgewater CEO Dave McCormick have done significant damage to one another, putting one another through “the opposition-research wringer,” giving Barnette a chance in the process.

The NY Post explains that “Barnette as a late breaker has yet to face the same scrutiny — but will if she’s the nominee.” The NY Post continues, noting that Barnette has begun to receive scrutiny for refusing to concede a House race and for implying that Barack Obama was a Muslim in a tweet.

The New York Post continued, pointing out that the race is winnable for the Republican Party, which can provide a “desperately needed check on the disastrous Biden White House” should they control the Senate. The New York Post concluded, “If Pennsylvania Republicans want to get the country back on the right track, they shouldn’t bet on a wild card.”

The NY Post editorial board’s call to Pennsylvania voters ahead of the May 17th primary comes as Trump made his own call on GOP voters in Pennsylvania, asking them to reject the Senate candidate, remarking “she has many things in her past that have not been properly vetted.”

Trump also commented on her viability in the general

“Kathy’s going to be a lot of trouble. I think she’s going to be a lot of trouble,” Trump said. “She may have a great future, but she’s totally an unknown. We can’t have that.” He added, “We have to take a majority in the Senate.”

Source

‘Ministry of Truth’ Previously Compared Free Speech to “Fairy Dust”

‘Ministry of Truth’ Previously Compared Free Speech to “Fairy Dust”


‘Ministry of Truth’ Previously Compared Free Speech to “Fairy Dust”

Hinting she doesn’t believe it should even exist

Paul Joseph Watson

The head of what has been dubbed the Biden administration’s ‘Ministry of Truth’ previously compared free speech to “fairy dust” during testimony about social media censorship in front of the UK Parliament.

Yes, really.

Nina Jankowicz, recently appointed DHS ‘disinformation czar,’ made the comments while providing oral evidence regarding the implementation of the UK’s controversial Online Safety Bill, which will ban legal content which has “the potential to cause harm.”

After agreeing that the government should set minimum speech standards which ban “misogyny,” Jankowicz blasted alternative social media platforms for supporting “freedom of expression and fairy dust.”

She also said that government-connected communications regulators such as Ofcom should “be able to establish the minimum standards that would be applied to all platforms and incur fines.”

“That could be based, again, on the preexisting terms of service,” she added.

Jankowicz also endorsed empowering governments to demand data on individual users from social media cites for the purpose of implementing further censorship policies.

“The social media platforms can do that if they are compelled to,” she said.

Jankowicz also asserted that social media platforms should utilize algorithms that would “allow us to get around some of the free speech concerns” by demoting content so few people saw it.

“You can shout in the black void, but you do not get a huge audience to do that,” she stated.

The comments are in line with previously statements made by Jankowicz when she revealed that free speech made her “shudder” while also promoting the lie that the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation.

The disinformation czar also ludicrously cited Christopher Steele as an expert on disinformation. Steele was the author of the infamous Clinton campaign-funded Trump ‘peegate’ dossier’ that turned out to be an actual product of disinformation.

As we previously highlighted, Jankowicz previously demanded that “trustworthy verified people” like her be given the power to edit other people’s tweets, making Twitter more like Wikipedia.

*********

(TLB) published this article from Summit News as compiled and written by Paul Joseph Watson


Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here. Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Also, we urgently need your financial support here.


Header featured image (edited) credit:  Nina Jankowicz/YouTube screen shot

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

Very revealing update on world situation

Very revealing update on world situation

Readers can make up their own minds about the message in this video.

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen’s nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no ‘government’ of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)