Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban Rocks CPAC Texas [Video]

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban Rocks CPAC Texas [Video]

 Orban Rocks CPAC Texas

“Less Drag Queens, More Chuck Norris”


Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who has fiercely defended his country’s borders, language and culture, gave a 30-minute speech to a crowd of thousands of American admirers in Dallas on Thursday at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).

He painted a picture of America and Hungary facing twin fronts in a struggle against liberalism, globalists, communists, and “fake news.”

“The West is at war with itself,” he said, adding “The globalist can all go to hell. I have come to Texas.”

I can already see tomorrow’s headlines: Far-right European racist, anti-Semite strongman — the Trojan horse of Putin — holds speech at the conservative conference,” he said, to applause and laughter. “They did not want me to be here, and they made every effort to drive a wedge between us. They hate me and slander me and my country as they hate you and slander you,” Orban continued.

Orban also railed against illegal migration, saying “To stop illegal immigration, we have actually built that wall,” adding that his government was able to “reduce illegal migration to zero.”

Then, Orban discussed the importance of family and rejecting gender ideology, saying we need to “build a wall around our children” to protect against people who are targeting them.

To sum up, the mother is a woman, the father is a man – and leave our kids alone. Full stop, end of discussion!

He then said we need “less drag queens and more Chuck Norris,” to loud applause.

“These two locations will define the two fronts in the battle being fought for Western civilization,” he said, adding “Today we hold neither of them yet. We need both. You have two years to get ready.”


(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled and written by Tyler Durden

Header featured image (edited) credit: Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Dallas, Thursday, Aug. 4, 2022. LM Otero/AP

Emmphasis added by (TLB) editors



Stay tuned to …


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


Justin Trudeau Slanders Unvaccinated Canadians as “Racist and Misogynistic”

Justin Trudeau Slanders Unvaccinated Canadians as “Racist and Misogynistic”

Canada Vancouver Sailing Farm – Liberte

Remember Bills C-10 and C-36 from the last Parliament before the election? They were designed to combat “misinformation”, “hate speech”, and ideas that might be “injurious to the social fabric” online according to the Justin Trudeau Government. The Canadian Government is putting the final touches to a new censorship bill that will be brought to the floor this January.

The Prime Minister thinks Canadians who express what HE believes are radical and hateful thoughts must be shut down. But what about his own hateful and radical thoughts, and the divisive and dangerous injury that he is inflicting on society? Will he shut them down too?

Our illustrious leader appeared on television in Quebec recently and stunned viewers by announcing that people who refuse to receive the, still experimental, Covid vaccine are “racist and misogynistic extremists”(1). Our extremist and polemicist Prime Minister is prone to such sophistry. He questioned whether the country should tolerate “these people” – a not-so-subtle hint of the fact that he is leaning towards NOT tolerating “these people”, and would, at the slightest indication that it was acceptable, round us up and incarcerate us, or worse. If this sounds frighteningly similar to previous episodes in history (read Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, Maduro and Xi) then you would be correct. Our Prime Minister has come completely un-moored from reality, decency, human rights, and what ‘should be’ his limited role in the life of citizens.

Our self-appointed Science expert Justin Trudeau also smeared “these people” as “science deniers” that are simply “taking up space”. Those of us who have been following the Science very closely, and who are frankly confused by the contradictions in the pronouncements of the “Health Experts”, have scored some wins recently. The age-old role of natural Immunity has been miraculously resurrected by many medical experts – although Justin Trudeau would still call natural immunity a conspiracy theory which is denying the science. The idea that the vaccinated are becoming infected and are infectious is now widely reported – however Justin Trudeau would label this as dangerous anti-science theory, and probably racist and misogynist as well. The opinion that vaccine mandates and passports are unethical, unlawful, unscientific and downright totalitarian since the vaccinated are infectious just like the unvaccinated (those who do not have natural immunity) is just common sense – but Justin Trudeau would say that it is a dangerous notion since it flies in the face of the government’s narrative that unvaccinated people must be ostracized from society for the good of ….. well, the government’s hidden agenda.

Justin Trudeau and his Government are trying to coerce citizens into accepting an experimental medical procedure first by denying those who are unvaccinated work, by denying them unemployment insurance, by denying them access to services they have paid for through their taxes, by denying them mobility and travel rights (flights, buses), and now by vilifying them with, frankly, slanderous and libelous lies. Nobody should ever be coerced into an experimental medical procedure.

Our ‘dear’ leader goes on to say that everybody must get jabbed because “we will emerge from this pandemic through vaccination”. Never have more inane words been expressed by a leader of a country. It is now widely understood, by those with a functioning cortex, that we cannot vaccinate ourselves out of this pandemic. In fact, it is the overapplication of vaccinations (plus the fact that the CCP keeps releasing new viruses) that is driving mutations of the existing viruses and causing untold thousands (or millions) of adverse medical effects. The viruses are quite simply ignoring the vaccines, and the vaccines themselves are now, more and more, revealing why the normal 5-year trial period for vaccine testing should never be circumvented by FDA Emergency Use Approval.

The leader of the People’s Party of Canada – Maxime Bernier summed up the reaction to Justin Trudeau’s libelous comments best, calling him a “Fascist Psychopath”. This is an indication of what is in store for Canada with Justin Trudeau in charge. In fact, HE is the extremist.  HE is the science-denier. HE is the one spewing misinformation. HE is the one promulgating hate speech and division – purposely. Maybe somebody should sue the Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for slander and libel.

REFERENCE: Amy Meek, RAIR Foundation USE, December 31, 2021

Disclaimer: This article only represents the author’s view. Gnews is not responsible for any legal risks.

#post_policy ul{padding-left:0px !important;} #post_policy ul li{ list-style:none !important; display:inline-block !important; padding:10px !important; } #post_policy ul li:hover,#post_policy ul li a:hover{text-decoration: none; !important;} #disclaimer,#post_policy ul li{font-size:15px !important;} #post_policy ul li a{font-size:15px !important;text-decoration: underline;}


Alleging False Accusations Of Racism, Softball Team Sues University

Alleging False Accusations Of Racism, Softball Team Sues University

The California Lutheran University softball team is suing their own school for what it says are false accusations of racism against the softball players and coaches over a team bonding event. 

The event is a bonding night that took place in January 2020 that involved costumes and skits,  a team tradition after their so-called “hell week.” Players wore “facial hair makeup to disguise themselves as males,” the lawsuit said. “Three of these young women wore hats, and two wore Caucasian male wigs (i.e., Napoleon Dynamite costume wigs).” 

Pictures and videos of the event were posted on the team’s Instagram, causing a member of the university to charge it was blackface. The playful and lighthearted activity was wrongly deemed racist, says the lawsuit. DeAnn Young, the coach who supervised the event, is African American. 

The lawsuit, filed by attorneys Michael Saltz and Elana Levine this summer, appears to still be pending. 

The charges in the suit include breach of contract, slander, libel and emotional distress. While only five members of the team participated in the skit, the clients of the suit include all 24 members of the softball team and 2019-20 softball coaches Debby Day, Young, and Jason Gluckman.

The team planned to take a Texas trip following the bonding activities for away games, but it was canceled and the coaches were put on administrative leave pending an investigation. Students on campus also pushed back, the California Lutheran University newspaper, The Echo, reported. 

Then-President of California Lutheran University Chris Kimball and Vice-President Melissa Maxwell-Doherty further criticized the softball team as racist to both local and national press, says the suit.

But the university did not stop there. Officials of the school “allowed the softball team and their coaches to be publicly shamed and harassed, placed in fear for their safety, and to otherwise suffer lifelong injury to their mental health and reputations,” the lawsuit says. The attacks the team faced caused players to need mental health support.

In response to the university’s actions, the suit calls for California Lutheran to be “held accountable for their gender inequality, for the damage they have unnecessarily caused to be inflicted on the 24 members of the Softball Team (19 of which did not take part in the performance at issue), and for the hostile work environment and constructive firing it inflicted upon the Softball Team’s coaching staff.” 


Look What They Are Saying About Our Fallen Heroes

Look What They Are Saying About Our Fallen Heroes
Look What They Are Saying About Our Fallen Heroes

A leftist propaganda rag masquerading as a news outlet had the audacity to slander our military just after thirteen soldiers died in Afghanistan.

On the morning of August 26th, the same morning of the bombing in Afghanistan, Vice News published an article attacking our soldiers and veterans — especially the Marines — entitled “Why Are So Many Marines Neo-Nazis?”

“While many vets are being outed as far-right extremists, one branch keeps popping up when it comes to neo-Nazis: the United States Marine Corps,” the tweet about the article read.

VICE tweet

Earlier that day, suicide attacks outside of Kabul airport killed 13 U.S. soldiers, ten of whom were Marines.

The official Twitter account for @VICE deleted the tweet, but its counterpart Twitter account, @VICENews, did not.

The author of the piece also shared it on his Twitter account with another shameful comment about our military.

While the US military writ-large has a far-right extremism problem, mounting evidence suggests the Marine Corps has a serious neo-Nazi problem (and it isn’t new). My latest for @VICENews looking at the USMC and its links to domestic terror,” Ben Makuch wrote.


Many people responded immediately on Twitter, calling out the fake news outlet for their disgraceful conduct.

“Meanwhile at VICE this is the crap they are posting. This is how liberals think. We lost 11 Marines today you f***** a**holes,” wrote Texas GOP Congressman Dan Crenshaw, a former Navy SEAL.

Political commentator Mike Cernovich responded, writing: “Scum of the earth – you.”

“SMDH, this is disgraceful- even for a garbage outfit like Vice,” wrote one Twitter user.

Another Twitter user had a sarcastic response to the outlet’s recent losses, writing: “I cannot imagine why your readership is down 75% and you keep laying people off…it is a mystery.”

“You’re out of your minds. Today of all days to accuse .0003% of marine corps in this as if that’s the pressing issue,” wrote another Twitter user.


Federal Judge: ‘One-Party Control Of The Press And Media Is A Threat To A Viable Democracy’

Federal Judge: ‘One-Party Control Of The Press And Media Is A Threat To A Viable Democracy’

The control of major media by one political party is a dangerous threat to the country, a federal judge warned in a blistering dissent that called for courts to revisit libel laws that generally protect the press from being held liable for their reporting.

“It should be borne in mind that the first step taken by any potential authoritarian or dictatorial regime is to gain control of communications, particularly the delivery of news,” wrote Judge Laurence Silberman of the D.C. Circuit for the Court of Appeals. “It is fair to conclude, therefore, that one-party control of the press and media is a threat to a viable democracy.”

Silberman argued that it’s time for courts to revisit New York Times v. Sullivan, which has shaped press law in favor of media outlets for more than five decades. The New York Times and the Washington Post “are virtually Democratic Party broadsheets. And the news section of The Wall Street Journal leans in the same direction,” Judge Silberman wrote in his March 19 dissent.

He said that orientation also controls the Associated Press and most large papers in the country, including the Los Angeles Times, Miami Herald, and Boston Globe. “Nearly all television—network and cable—is a Democratic Party trumpet,” Judge Silberman added.

Silicon Valley also has “enormous influence” over the distribution of news and it “similarly filters news delivery in ways favorable to the Democratic Party,” wrote Judge Silberman, highlighting the shocking suppression of stories about Joe Biden and his family when he was running for president.

In that case, Twitter and Facebook censored media outlets that reported accurately about the Biden family’s dealing with foreign entities. Twitter suspended users, including sitting White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany, for merely sharing accurate information, and prevented people from sharing the information privately on its platform. Facebook said it would censor coverage of the Biden family corruption pending a “fact-check,” an unprecedented privilege given to Biden in the closing days of one of the closest presidential elections in history.

Only a few major media outlets are not controlled by the left, Silberman noted, citing Fox News, where this reporter is a contributor, the New York Post, and The Wall Street Journal. “It should be sobering for those concerned about news bias that these institutions are controlled by a single man and his son. Will a lone holdout remain in what is otherwise a frighteningly orthodox media culture? After all, there are serious efforts to muzzle Fox News,” he wrote. CNN hosts and other leftist activsts are currently on a campaign to deplatform their rival.

“Admittedly, a number of Fox’s commentators lean as far to the right as the commentators and reporters of the mainstream outlets lean to the left,” Silberman wrote in a footnote, in a dig at reporters inserting their extreme partisan views into news stories.

A New York Supreme Court judge last week ruled against The New York Times’ effort to get a defamation suit against it dismissed. The Times had said that its reporters were inserting opinion into news stories, and that opinions are not actionable for defamation. The argument didn’t hold sway with the judge, who critiqued the blending of news and opinion in purported news stories.

Another footnote critiqued the tepid response of some to “big tech’s behavior” censoring conservative speech. Silberman called repression of political speech in large institutions with market power “fundamentally un-American.”

“Some emphasize these companies are private and therefore not subject to the First Amendment. Yet—even if correct— it is not an adequate excuse for big tech’s bias. The First Amendment is more than just a legal provision: It embodies the most important value of American Democracy. Repression of political speech by large institutions with market power therefore is—I say this advisedly—fundamentally un-American,” Silberman wrote.

He then cited Tim Groseclose’s book, “Left Turn: How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind,” which empirically argued that media bias even a decade ago gave Democrat candidates an 8-10 point advantage. “And now, a decade after this book’s publication, the press and media do not even pretend to be neutral news services.” Silberman noted.

“The First Amendment guarantees a free press to foster a vibrant trade in ideas. But a biased press can distort the marketplace. And when the media has proven its willingness—if not eagerness—to so distort, it is a profound mistake to stand by unjustified legal rules that serve only to enhance the press’ power,” Silberman concluded.



Please help truthPeep spread the word :)