AustraliaOne Party – Deborah Tavares: Nasa Depopulation Document

AustraliaOne Party Published September 16, 2022

Interview from 2013

This document was retrieved from NASA’s website created in July 2001 that outlines how War HAS BEEN DECLARED AGAINST HUMANITY.

Source video link:

Deborah Tavares Website:

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

A.I. Run Factory To Process 5000 Tons of Meat Per Day – Delivered Via Trains

A.I. Run Factory To Process 5000 Tons of Meat Per Day – Delivered Via Trains

Greg Reese – Jul 2, 2022

As we celebrate our independence this year we must remember that the 1973 film Soylent Green took place in 2022

Take advantage of our biggest discounts of the year right now!

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

The Robots of Our Past

The Robots of Our Past

WisdomLand – May 24th, 2022

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation



tangentopolis (world orders review) – January 22nd, 2022

sub, share; support #worldordersreview
(e) worldordersreview [@] protonmail [dot] com
So, billions have lined up to take the multiple jabs, unaware that they were being injected with a highly advanced BIO-WEAPON, yes it’s a bio-weapon, some big names out there are saying it isn’t, well, there are qualified people in this video who claim that they are, and that vaccines can be weaponized, I’ll take that over the “opinion” of a Jesuit shill any day!

The scary thing is, what exactly have those jabs been programmed to do, they can cause blood clots, cancers and many other serious and deadly health issues, however, the fact that they cut out, replace and are designed to re-programme human DNA still leaves many questions unanswered.

We know that the fake CV19 virus is a smokescreen to panic the world into taking the jabs, also that the Chinese Communist Party own the patent for the genetic sequence that is being injected into the western world, BUT, what exactly have the Chinese Communist Party programmed those genetic sequences to do? Just think about that, are the Chinese AI created CV19 genetic sequences a Communist Trojan horse?

It has been injected into billions worldwide and there’s no way of getting it out, so for now it’s a waiting game and they haven’t activated the 5G grid yet, when that happens, it’s gonna be a whole different ball game!

An End Times Watchman production #

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

In ‘Human Forever,’ James Poulos Declares War On The Digital Age

In ‘Human Forever,’ James Poulos Declares War On The Digital Age

The editor of The American Mind has declared war. If his new book doesn’t shake you awake, you were meant to be a machine.

The world has already ended. The “cyborg age” arrived so quietly, few people noticed. Each person now carries a permanent digital device in his palm. In the blink of an eye, all of us—from the developed world to the farthest backwaters—were turned into cyborgs.

The year 2021 will be remembered as Year Zero. The children born into this “digital catastrophe” will be known as the First Generation. Our only recourse is to teach them how to survive or help them discover means of survival under the “digital swarm” unleashed upon us.

This is the argument laid out in Human Forever: The Digital Politics of Spiritual War, the latest book by James Poulos. If the premise sounds like science fiction, you haven’t been paying attention. As the powerful struggle for dominance, and the rest power through their lives, technology has seduced all our souls with little need of direct force.

Human Forever is a work of profound scholarship, conveyed with Straussian subtlety. Poulos’s narrative weaves together the finest minds to wrestle with technology’s impact: Marshall McLuhan, Norbert Wiener, Lewis Mumford, and David Deutsch, among others—including a superb confrontation with the posthuman mutant Benjamin Bratton.

In an effort to recover from the digital catastrophe, Poulos steadies himself on the Western tradition—Greek, Christian, and American—as a spiritual bulwark against electronic oblivion. “Until further notice, we must live—recognizably as we were created,” he writes. “Our task is not to ascend infinitely toward heaven or bring it ever closer down to earth, not to escape into the Creator or into creation, but to remain ourselves indefinitely.”

As executive editor of The American Mind and a fellow at The Center for the Study of Digital Life, Poulos had enormous momentum behind his manifesto, written in a single season. He skillfully channels the wisdom of the intellectual Right, while grasping the technical details of our greatest threat: digital dissolution.

How do we preserve humanity in the face of this rapid transformation? Poulos urges guarded “inwardness” in the maelstrom. Looking ahead, he emphasizes the rites of passage that turn young boys into men, elevating them to become “guardians of civilization.” Facing an uncertain future, they must be prepared to forge new paths we could never predict. They must be ready for spiritual war.

After the Digital Catastrophe

Human Forever delivers an alarming report from the enemy lines. One has only to observe children, or any person, stare blankly into their screens to predict the dead zone ahead. “The most arresting vision of the digital swarm acquiring a life of its own, a life over us, is the one aroused by the harsh comparison to human beings that, unlike us, the digital swarm does not need to be alive.” At once obvious and invisible, these lifeless automata wield unprecedented power over our minds and behavior.

Poulos describes this process as mental terraforming. Our social landscape is reconfigured according to the influence of digital devices and those who control them. By extracting our data and mining our private moments for profit and power, Silicon Valley titans, shadowy third-parties, and intelligence agencies are creating detailed models of our personalities—one by one—manipulating us to conform to their ideal simulation. In the aggregate, this process is creating a new type of human being: experimental subjects in a “cyborg vivarium.”

The electric phantasms that enshroud our minds, Poulos argues, stoke the imagination while eroding our memory. This lost memory is not limited to mere recall, which has certainly been outsourced to our devices. Rather, the delusional state sustained by digital culture has separated us from our own biographies and deep cultural lineage. This digital culture, dead and soulless, freezes our development in a perpetual present, with vapid fantasies of the future flickering on the edge of our screens.

“The master key to the transformational project of the transmaterial self is the work of queering,” Poulos says of the virtual realm (and the current regime). “Queered to the point of posthumanity, our consciousness has no need for human memory of who any of us were born as, or what any of our meat bodies, as they say, once looked like. … Memory can be relegated to the machines.” To the extent our natural heritage is preserved in this sadistic process, it’s warped and turned against us.

On a more mundane level, as artificial intelligence is increasingly employed to direct our attention or determine public policy, AI ethics provides justification to control of these silicon slave-drivers. In America, the left has paid far more attention to this shift toward digital power structures than the right:

It is this faction that has tried to impose itself atop the stack of ethereal ethicists and establish itself as the imaginative will in charge of digitalization, automation, face recognition, and artificial intelligence. … [T]heir desired catechesis is a totalistic universal incompatible with the foundational folkways of American civilization and unable to encompass and infuse it under the pluralizing pressure of the digital age.

Poulos correctly identifies their endgame, whether by design or default, as a social credit system that confers privilege or ostracism in accord with those commanding the digital swarm. He takes a complex view of this chaotic development, though. People on the left are still as vulnerable to the psychic erosion of rampant digitalization as those on the right, if not more so. Conservatives may have become complacent, but as Poulos dryly notes, liberals have devolved into repellent variations of the O-mouthed Soyface.

Even though digitalization has devastated American culture and Christian tradition, Poulos insists that electronics also open various paths to reassert Western values and identity. “Unable to sustain lives of indolence or madness alone, the people conscripted themselves en masse in the great global infowar.”  But victory will never be achieved, in either psychic or physical space, if legacy Americans—indeed, legacy humans—remain naive, as if the onrushing Fourth Industrial Revolution were only science fiction.

The Spiritual Weapons of Digital War

For Poulos, maintaining our humanity under the digital swarm is spiritual warfare. This isn’t simply a metaphor. From ubiquitous smart devices to advanced AI, many of the mesmerizing gadgets sold at Best Buy were first created in military research and development labs. Poulos amusingly calls this “the security state-to-startup pipeline.”

Advertised as “empowerment,” this weaponry is now aimed at our heads. Poulos follows the decades-long process to its fruition under the Obama administration, after the first smartphones appeared in 2007:

Now, the most powerful tool of governance on Earth was communications technology itself, a revolution that made it imperative for policymakers to load surveillance, security, and social media software with the primary responsibility for manifesting America’s and the world’s harmonious and unified new destiny. … But the epistemological funhouse in which America’s elite had locked itself produced a systemic culture of misinformation and misperception which…led to surprise after surprise and humiliation after humiliation, a staggering display of core incompetence.

While failing to secure world hegemony or even increase overall prosperity, this psychological warfare was most effective against American citizens. As material conditions continue to deteriorate in our country, Poulos predicts, we will increasingly retreat into the virtual realm for sensory satisfaction. Yet he’s confident the cyborg vivarium we’re being herded into is not inescapable. The cracks are all around us, if obscured by blinding artificial light.

Poulos believes our way out is a recovery of memory—of who we were before the digital catastrophe, going back into the depths of antiquity. He urges readers to cultivate an “inwardness,” a preservation of authentic identity against a society lost to delusional imagination. The way forward, ultimately, is to transmit this deep memory to the First Generation, to those born into the digital swarm, so they can carry humanity’s torch into whatever chaos may await:

We need [true revelation]—to be worthy of stories, to pass up and out of childhood into the fullness of maturity. The quest for that worth, that maturity, is a spiritual war—of the sort our souls cry out for most when the field of human life is artificially reduced in the name of perpetual peace.

Invoking the despondent optimism of Romano Guardini, the Catholic theologian, Poulos is convinced we must take control of these tools, employing everything from decentralized cryptocurrency to artificial intelligence to our advantage. We must “catechize” the bots and pick up every weapon at our disposal.

To some degree, adaptation is unavoidable. I typed these words on a laptop; you are reading them on a screen. But most of the coming technologies—advanced artificial intelligence, hyperreal virtual reality, neuroenhancement, and our robotic replacements—are inherently anti-human. Even smartphones are tools of the damned. This is an alien order of being, hostile to our nature and beyond redemption.

Poulos would be the first to say there are many forks in the dark road ahead. He doesn’t necessarily dismiss Luddite regression, although he certainly counsels against it. In the end, what tools any of us may accept or reject are less important than our common cause. His rallying cry is simple and absolute—under threat of mechanization, we must remain human forever. That any person still denies this struggle is a testament to the spell cast over us.


Kroger Set to DOMINATE Local Area Without Opening a Single Store Front

Kroger Set to DOMINATE Local Area Without Opening a Single Store Front


A grocery chain giant across most of America has a brand recognition problem in Florida, where they never heard of Kroger before. Despite the challenge, the provisioner to the masses wants to dominate the local market, through direct deliveries off all your groceries, unless you live in a swamp.

Kroger goes virtual

Kroger realizes that the way Americans buy their groceries has changed radically over the generations, from the days of a merchant pulling items from inventory at your request, to the miracle of “self-service” grocery stores pioneered by Piggly Wiggly. Up until 1916, nobody imagined things like checkout stands, individual item price marking or shopping carts.


George Bush Sr. was floored by laser scan check stands which had been in use nearly 20 years by the time he noticed. He expected price stickers. That general system worked well, until the year of the bat. When Covid came along, with lockdowns and quarantines, brick and mortar grocery stores started to go the way of the buggy whip.

Without opening a single storefront store in the entire state of Florida, “Kroger wants to attract tens of thousands of new customers.” All they need is a giant “shed” warehouse staffed by robots. We’ve suddenly regressed back to the pre-twentieth century mercantile model.

Instead of driving your wagon to the store, you tap out your purchase order on your phone. Instead of a human grocer who makes snide remarks about the things you purchase, robots mindlessly wander around and pull the order per instructions without even thinking about what they’re doing. They also don’t notice things like that big bruise on the tomato. The grocer expects the consumer to overlook things like that in the name of progress.

Kroger officials promise “a giant warehouse of robots that help retrieve such products as bananas, milk and meat.”

If they can hire enough vaccinated truck drivers they’ll have “a fleet of delivery drivers that drop off online grocery orders at people’s doors.” Not everyone’s doors, they admit, just those who live on paved roads.

[embedded content]

Eight football fields

The robot workers will be getting lots of exercise as they crawl around an automated warehouse “big enough to fit nearly eight football fields.” Those don’t come cheap. It’s “a pricey bet for the grocer and an illustration of its e-commerce ambitions.”

Kroger already did some field testing in the U.K. after they “struck a deal with British online grocer Ocado to build a network of customer fulfillment centers.” That’s where they picked up the nickname “sheds”

Kroger “has opened two sheds so far, with plans for at least nine more over the next two years.” Some of those will be right here at home. Florida, they say, “is ground zero.” They want galactic domination of the market.


They plotted out “a national strategy to become a more dominant e-commerce player.” Already, they shelled out “at least $55 million just on construction” of the Florida shed alone. They already boosted the local economy.

As they get the project rolling, Kroger “has hired 900 employees and counting across the state.” They plan to use the operation as a model “to break into new markets and take on grocery rivals, including entrenched regional players like Florida-based Publix and retail behemoths like Amazon and Walmart.” That won’t be easy.

They know they have to fight for basic survival in a cut-throat industry. The “grocer must not only prove the sheds can power a large, profitable e-commerce business in a notoriously low-margin industry, it must also win over customers in a brand-new market where some may not even know its name. It may be the largest supermarket operator in the country, but in the state, Kroger is the newcomer and, at least initially, the underdog.”


Great Reset: World Economic Forum Declares the ‘Age of Human Robots Is Over’

Great Reset: World Economic Forum Declares the ‘Age of Human Robots Is Over’

The globalist World Economic Forum has released a video in which three “futurists” predict what human life will look like after the so-called Great Reset, foretelling that technology will replace the “age of human robots”.

“Take a walk into the future,” the World Economic Forum (WEF) implored users on social media on Monday, as they presented the Great Reset technological wonders which will free humanity from manual labour in favour of work which requires “understanding what it means to be human.”

Stuart Russell of the University of California, Berkeley said in the video: “We’re getting past the last 10,000 years where we’ve used humans, by and large, engaging only a tiny fraction of human abilities and forcing people into repetitive, tedious dead-end work for the most part.”

“So the age of human robots is over and we have to figure out a new age. That means dramatic changes to the structure of our economy and society,” he declared.

In extended remarks from the Global Technology Governance Summit, Professor Russell said that people shouldn’t be afraid of automation taking their jobs for the time being, saying: “The kind of AI that people are worried about taking all the jobs doesn’t exist yet.”

Professor Amy Webb of New York University’s Stern School of Business predicted the increased use of editing genomes in order to “write a new code for life” and “redesign organisms for beneficial purposes”.

The professor said that this process has already begun with some of the coronavirus vaccines, which she noted: “make use of an engineered code in the form of messenger RNA”.

Webb went on to predict the use of “diminished reality glasses” which would enable the wearer remove unwanted things from their view, such as “garbage or other people”.

Mike Bechtel, Chief Futurist of the London-based Deloitte, said that “ambient” technology will always listen to your commands rather than needing to address specific smart speakers.

He likened the immersive tech experience to a “digital Downton Abbey” in which the “right agent” comes to aid you in each scenario.

Responding to the video, anti-woke campaigner Dr James Lindsay wrote: “These freaks are excited about this stuff.”

“The genteel quasi-Marxist elitist dorks with soft hands, who want to reshape our world according to their vision, which is already failing, don’t understand that doing honest work and feeling proud of it is a huge part of ‘understanding what it means to be human’,” Lindsay said.

In June of last year, the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, famously declared that the Chinese coronavirus was an opportunity for global governments to introduce a “Great Reset of capitalism“.

The globalist German engineer argued that the “world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies.”

The call for a ‘new age’ has been longstanding from the Davos-based group, with a 2016 video predicting a ‘happy’ future in which individuals no longer owned property.

“Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city – or should I say, ‘our city’. I don’t own anything. I don’t own a car. I don’t own a house. I don’t own any appliances or any clothes,” the WEF projected.

The World Economic Forum recently came under criticism for hailing the benefit of “quieter” cities as a result of the coronavirus lockdowns which they said have been “improving cities around the world”.

Follow Kurt Zindulka on Twitter here @KurtZindulka


Inside The Global Race To Build Killer Robot Armies

Inside The Global Race To Build Killer Robot Armies

The temptation to open Pandora’s Box is irresistible. In early March, the U.S. National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence completed its two-year inquiry, publishing its findings in a dense 750-page report. Its members unanimously concluded that the United States has a “moral imperative” to pursue the use lethal autonomous weapons, a.k.a. “killer robots.” Otherwise, we risk bringing a rusty knife to a superhuman gunfight.

Citing the threat of China or Russia leading the global artificial intelligence (AI) arms race, the commission’s chairman, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, urged President Biden to reject a proposed international ban on AI-controlled weapons. Schmidt rightly suspects our major rivals won’t abide by such a treaty, warning U.S. leaders, “This is the tough reality we must face.”

If other superpowers are going to unleash demonic drone swarms on the world, the logic goes, the United States should be the first to open the gates of Hell.

America first deployed autonomous aerial vehicles in the aftermath of 9/11. The libertarian blog has covered this transition in critical detail. Laurie Calhoun writes, “[O]n November 3, 2002, the Drone Age effectively began with the CIA’s extrajudicial execution of six men driving down a road in Yemen using a Hellfire missile launched from a Predator drone. The act went virtually unquestioned.” Since then, remote-controlled strikes have become a standard tactic to “fight terror” and save American lives.

Nearly two decades later, a new era of autonomous weapons is rapidly approaching. A wide array of AI-assisted weapons is already in use, but they still require a human operator to confirm the target and order the kill. That will likely change in the near future.

What Damage Can Drones Do?

The attack drones currently on the market are plenty dangerous as is. A good example is the KARGU loitering munitions system, currently deployed by Turkish forces. This lightweight quadcopter “can be effectively used against static or moving targets through its … real-time image processing capabilities and machine learning algorithms.”

KARGU’s mode of attack is full-on kamikaze. It hovers high in the air as the operator searches for victims. When one is located, the drone dive-bombs its target and explodes. If the concussion doesn’t kill them, the shrapnel will. Just imagine what a thousand could do.

A single quadcopter is only one cog in the AI war machine. The ultimate “death from above” technology will be the killer drone swarm. Even as a war-averse civilian, its hard not to feel deep admiration for its ingenious design.

Forbes reporter David Hambling describes the organizing principle: “True swarm behavior arises from a simple set of rules which each of the participating members follows, with no central controller. … [Computer simulations have] mimicked the collective movements seen in schools of fish and flocks of birds or swarms of insects with just three rules.”

Each drone in the swarm will separate at a minimum distance, align toward the direction of near neighbors, and cohere to maintain harmonious movement. This behavior allows attack drones to spread out over large areas and execute “omnidirectional attacks,” descending on the enemy from all angles.

Presently, military swarms are limited to a few hundred drones, but as the technology advances, these will increase into the thousands. Given full autonomy, a massive swarm could move like a storm cloud over a populace, with onboard AI rapidly hitting targets based on facial features, racial profiles, uniforms, or even surveilled cellphone data. Conceivably, they could home in on anything with two legs, leaving valuable infrastructure intact.

The capacity for unrestrained carnage is horrific. In a 2018 study conducted for the US Air Force, drone specialist Zachary Kallenborn correctly argued that lethal drone swarms should be declared weapons of mass destruction. Many others have joined that refrain.

Unsurprisingly, these protests have not deterred the highest earthly powers. According to PAX, a predominantly Christian organization in the Netherlands, the countries on the cutting edge of military AI are China, France, Russia, the UK, and the USA, with Israel and South Korea just behind. It’s hard to imagine any of them hitting the brakes without coercion.

In 2019, PAX published a list of the global corporations most likely to develop lethal autonomous weapon systems. Among the U.S. companies ranked as “high risk” are Amazon, Microsoft, and Oracle, as well as Intel, Palantir, Neurala, Corenova, and Heron Systems. It’s worth noting that the top members of the National Security Commission on AI—all of whom support using these murder machines—include chiefs from Amazon, Microsoft, and Oracle.

It’s as if the drive to create superior weapons is part of human nature.

The Future of Life Looks Bleak

Both leftists and libertarians denounce the idea of fully autonomous weapons. The Future of Life Institute, founded by AI visionary Max Tegmark, reiterated its long-standing opposition to giving intelligent machines the choice to kill human beings, claiming that “it is morally inappropriate for algorithms to make life and death decisions when they’re incapable of understanding the value of human life.”

There’s a catch. Despite the institute’s admirable humanitarian motives, there’s an ominous subtext to their statement. If AI developers succeed in their ambitions, artificial intelligence will not only come to “understand the value of human life” — it will one day surpass us in knowledge and wisdom.

In his well-reasoned book, “Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence,” Tegmark describes the progression of life on Earth from biological organisms to cultural entities. As this process advances, self-aware digital lifeforms will come to fulfill humanity’s dreams of god-like powers.

While the Massachusetts Institute of Technology scientist makes no hard predictions, he conveys a subtle sense of inevitability, as if self-driving cars and the Singularity are just natural tendencies in human evolution. Even so, he somehow holds out hope that if we play our cards right, this tech revolution won’t lead to widespread human suffering.

To raise awareness of this imminent threat, the Future of Life Institute produced the alarming, if poorly acted film Slaughterbots. The finale shows dissident college students having their brains blown out by bird-sized quadcopters. Their intention was to shock the public out of its complacency.

[embedded content]

In a 2015 open letter, Tegmark wrote, “Autonomous weapons have been described as the third revolution in warfare, after gunpowder and nuclear arms.” Drafted with partners at Future of Life, the document advocates an international ban on hands-free killer robots. To date, they’ve garnered signatures from thousands of AI and robotics developers, plus hundreds of prominent organizations.

If any major military power pushes ahead with AI weapon development, a global arms race is virtually inevitable. … Unlike nuclear weapons, they require no costly or hard-to-obtain raw materials, so they’ll become ubiquitous and cheap. …

Autonomous weapons are ideal for tasks such as assassinations, destabilizing nations, subduing populations, and selectively killing a particular ethnic group. We therefore believe that a military AI arms race would not be beneficial for humanity.

Five years later, it looks like that ship is about sail—with or without the consent of its human passengers. Just as Chinese fireworks gave way to cannon artillery, synchronized light shows are giving way to deadly drone swarms.

In their own ways, both Schmidt and Tegmark are probably correct. Like it or not, the Age of AI is hurtling down the pike at warp speed. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t make every effort to contain or resist it.

It’s also easy to ignore such problems when military aggression is turned outward, as with the “War on Terror.” But our government is bringing the war back home.

Early in the pandemic, police in 22 states deployed talking drones — supplied by China — to surveil pedestrians and order them to social distance. Presently, police departments across America are acquiring top-of-the-line drones to be used as they please.

Since the inauguration, Washington D.C. has been fortified by soldiers and razor wire against half the country. Joe Biden is focusing intelligence resources on American citizens. The Department of Homeland Security warns law enforcement and the public to look out for “domestic violent extremists” motivated by “anger over COVID-19 restrictions, the 2020 election results, and police use of force” as well as “opposition to immigration.” Reckless MSNBC hosts are comparing rowdy MAGA folks to Islamic terrorists.

If there was ever a good time to reach across the aisle and steer “progress” away from disaster, it’s now.



Please help truthPeep spread the word :)