UK Police Instructed to Record Criminals, Victims by Actual Sex

UK Police Instructed to Record Criminals, Victims by Actual Sex

Victory for all who affirm men should be excluded from changing rooms, etc.

A new report in the UK confirms that the Home Office is asking police now to record criminals and victims with their birth sex, not their “gender identification.”

The guidance instructs police to identify the person’s “gender identity” if it is revealed to be different from a birth certificate.

The new result will give authorities a perspective on how many men are committing crimes while identifying as women -therefore skewing the statistics for crime by women.

The Independent reported the new guidance said a official for the Home Office said the plans are voluntary, but could become the standard based on Police feedback.

 “It is a victory for gender-critical feminist campaigners who believe that trans women should be excluded from women’s toilets, changing rooms, healthcare facilities, domestic violence shelters, and prisons.” The report exclaimed.

It also noted how advocates for the transgender agenda warned it could discourage transgender individuals from reporting crimes.

The plan first was confirmed in a Freedom of Information procedure request by Keep Prisons Single Sex, a campaign organization that says failing to record criminals’ birth sex allows “male crime [to be] hidden in female data.”

According to a statement from the Christian Institute, “Last year, at least 16 police forces shared data with the Home Office in which they recorded offenses on the basis of the offenders’ ‘gender identity’ instead of their actual sex.”

The Institute reported, “Plans to allow people to self-declare as someone of the opposite sex on the 2021 census were abandoned after the high court told the Office for National Statistics it must only allow people to enter their legal sex rather than being able to choose their ‘preferred option.’”

The Home Office said new procedures would follow the outline already in use for the census forms.

“This means for the first time we will know how many male offenders appear in the female crime stats.” Fair Play for Women, an advocacy organization for women, said.


The Tyranny of the Pandemic Treaty

Australia and other nations will become puppet states of the WHO and the WEF.

There is worldwide outrage and concern about the latest attempt at globalist power grabs which will turn the concept of national sovereignty into a sick joke. The plan to revise the International Health Regulations (IHR) of the World Health Organization (WHO) is one of the biggest threats we face in terms of freedom and democracy. I recently reported on this in a detailed article.

There is so much more that can be said about this monstrous and diabolical plot that more articles are needed. This is especially the case since the big three parties here — Libs, Labor and the Greens — all seem to be quite happy about ceding authority to the WHO, and to Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF), and to globalists like Bill Gates who is up to his ears in backing both organisations.

Botched by Biden

Many freedom fighters from around the globe have voiced their concerns about this frightening move by the WHO. Let me begin with Mat Staver of the US-based Liberty Counsel. He said this in part about this nefarious initiative:

Recognizing the IHR’s threat to U.S. sovereignty, former President Donald Trump stopped sending U.S. taxpayer dollars to WHO and began the process of pulling America out of the U.N. organization. Globalist billionaire Bill Gates countered by pledging to replace the lost American income to the tune of 250 million dollars.

Upon taking office, Joe Biden reversed President Trump and rejoined the so-called “global authority.” Now he wants to cede sovereignty to the WHO, which is ideologically aligned with Communist China and Bill Gates. But it was not enough for Biden to simply rejoin WHO. Biden is actively trying to cede more of America’s sovereignty to a U.N. globalist body.

On January 18, the Biden administration delivered 13 pages of proposed changes to WHO’s IHR charter. Biden did not consult Congress. In fact, Americans would not even know about the proposed amendments if it had not been for an independent researcher who discovered the scheme and raised an alarm on April 12.

WHO member states will vote on Biden’s proposed amendments NEXT WEEK, May 22-28. Because the U.S. already signed on to the IHR agreement in 2005, the U.S. Senate is not required to approve IHR amendments. It will be the globalists’ dream and every Americans’ nightmare. One of the shocking amendments Biden put forward adds nearly an entire new chapter (article 53) to the IHR agreement, establishing a heretofore nonexistent “Compliance Committee.”

Upon threat of being dragged to the World Court’s arbitration unit, where steep fines and sanctions can be imposed, member states are required to report IHR compliance measures to the “Compliance Committee,” which will “monitor” each nation’s progress with the IHR directives. The Committee, for its part, “shall strive to make its recommendations on the basis of consensus,” but consensus is not required to force WHO’s will on a member state.

Among the many other changes the Biden administration put forward is a provision that allows WHO’s director-general to appoint “relevant intergovernmental organizations or nongovernmental organizations in official relations with WHO to designate representatives.” Bill Gates is WHO’s second-highest funder, exceeded only by the United States. The Gates Foundation regularly donates up to 500 million per year to the globalist society. You can bet Gates or his surrogate will sit on that committee!

Slow-Mo & Albo

Here in Australia, Alexandra Marshall from the Australian Spectator has written some very important pieces on all this. In one article from last week she wrote:

The ‘New Normal’ of medical fascism is coming regardless of how Australians vote at the federal election. Having acquired a taste for globalised control during the Covid pandemic, the World Health Organisation has teamed up with vaccine manufacturers, philanthropic billionaires, and power-crazed world leaders to create a ‘Global Pandemic Treaty’ in Geneva. It is set to form part of the ‘one health’ approach proposed by the WHO and has been pitched by its creators as a way to overcome the inconvenient battle between — as they put it — globalism and statism…

In June of 2021, Scott Morrison commented on the proposed treaty, saying: “It’s essential that we strengthen global (disease) surveillance and provide the World Health Organisation with the authority and the capacity to do this important job for all the peoples of the world. If we are to deliver on this ambitious reform agenda, then we must work together and put other issues aside.”

Yes, the same Prime Minister who attempted to escape criticism by saying ‘there’s no such thing as vaccine mandates’ is champing at the bit to grant the WHO absolute control over the health choices of Australian citizens. It amounts to extending similar emergency powers to the WHO that Daniel Andrews gifted himself in Victoria — except Australians can’t vote the WHO out of power. As for Labor, they have laid down at the feet of the WHO, tummies up and paws in the air like dogs waiting for a rub…

If Scott Morrison or Anthony Albanese sign this treaty, it represents a seismic shift in everything we thought we knew about democracy. It is likely the treaty will make it possible for a foreign bureaucracy with unacceptably close ties to China to call the shots — literally — on global public health. Universal healthcare was meant to be a voluntary safety net — not a stepping stone to international socialism or the dissolution of body autonomy. That said, the wheels are already falling off, with questions being raised about whether it will be a ‘treaty’ in the legal sense after parts of the WHO Constitution were re-worded.

The vote for this dangerous Pandemic Treaty will be held in Geneva on May 22-28. Whoever the next Prime Minister of Australia is, they will be there with bells on, ready to sign and absolve themselves of the ‘bother’ of responsibility. It is a dream come true for weak leaders who would love nothing better than to let the blame for the next pandemic and the accompanying citizen outrage rest safely offshore.

In a newer piece, she writes:

It beggars belief. After two and a half years in which a cohort of left-leaning politicians, elite bureaucrats, over-zealous health officials and opportunistic drug manufacturers cajoled, harangued, bullied and used police brutality to force many of us into locking ourselves down for months on end in our homes, closing our children’s schools, abandoning our elderly and frail relatives to suffer alone without family affection, losing our jobs, bankrupting our businesses, trashing our investments, compromising our mental health, wearing largely pointless masks and taking unproven medical treatments frequently against our better judgement, those most responsible for the authoritarian excesses and abuses of the Covid-19 era now wish to further encourage such activities with a World Health Organisation Global Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Treaty. 194 nations, including our own, are said to intend ratifying a series of Biden administration ‘amendments’ supporting such a treaty at a special meeting of the World Health Assembly this week in Geneva…

The pandemic and its aftermath have taught us one invaluable lesson: too much power in the hands of unelected officials and unaccountable bureaucracies only results in bad, even deadly, decision-making. It is increasingly clear that nations such as Sweden and states such as Florida which took a more sceptical or nuanced approach to implementing strict Covid restrictions — trusting in the choices of individuals rather than imposing draconian, one-size-fits-all measures from on high — have fared certainly no worse and sometimes even better than others. On excess mortalities over the Covid period, for example, Sweden sits near the bottom of the European tally…

The understandable fear of many is that if the aspirations of those behind this treaty and its amendments are realised — gifting the WHO the legal power to impose at will pandemic restrictions of their own design upon any nation, state or community — then when the next pandemic comes around we could be looking at Dan Andrews-style lockdowns and police brutality being imposed on us willy-nilly by an unelected global authority.

Get Out Now

Finally, One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts said this in part about this ominous threat:

The police and armed forces have already demonstrated their support for these measures during COVID. One Nation strongly opposes the ceding of our sovereignty to the UN and WHO. Unelected, unrepresentative foreign bureaucrats should not have the power to lock Australia down and force Australians to undergo medical procedures.

The Government should never have the power to force a medical procedure without your consent, an unelected international organisation certainly should not. This brazen proposal shows the WHO is not fit for purpose, cannot be trusted and does not operate with Australia’s sovereign interests in mind. Australia must immediately exit the WHO and maintain our sovereignty.

It is vital that every Australian does at least two things to fight this totalitarian evil. One, vote very carefully this Saturday in our national election. The major parties cannot be trusted on these matters. Two, contact your political representatives and tell them in no uncertain terms that we do not want Australia to become a mere puppet state of the globalists, of Gates, of WHO, of the UN, and of the WEF.

Three video resources

In this 35-minute video, George Christensen and Senator Malcolm Roberts discuss the Pandemic Treaty, Digital ID and the Great Reset:

And here is a 6-minute video on the WHO treaty by Rebel News:

Glenn Beck also has a 6-minute video on this:

Sign the petition

Here is a petition you can sign and share. It says in part:

The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level. 194 member states representing 99% of the world’s population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.

This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations.


Originally published at CultureWatch.

Thank the Source

Joe Biden: ‘Heck of a Lot Harder’ to Be a Cop Today in a ‘Different World’

Joe Biden: ‘Heck of a Lot Harder’ to Be a Cop Today in a ‘Different World’

President Joe Biden acknowledged the difficulty of being a police officer in the current political and social climate during a speech at the National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service on Capitol Hill on Sunday.

“Being a cop today is a lot harder than it has ever been,” Biden said, alluding to rising crime in some of America’s biggest cities under his administration.

Seventy-three law enforcement officers were killed in the line of duty in 2021, 24 of which were killed in unprovoked attacks. Twenty-seven more officers were killed in 2021 than in 2020.

The president tried to sympathize with police officers, despite his longtime support for radical anti-police organizations such as Black Lives Matter.

President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden attend the National Peace Officers' Memorial Service at the Capitol in Washington, Sunday, May 15, 2022, honoring the law enforcement officers who lost their lives in the line of duty in 2021. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

President Joe Biden attends the National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service at the Capitol in Washington, Sunday, May 15, 2022. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

“It is a different world,” Biden said. “Over the last several years it is so much more complicated, the job is complicated. We expect so much more from all of you.”

He said police officers should not have to serve as psychiatrists, mental health counselors, and drug counselors, adding that too often, police got “figuratively and literally caught in the crossfire.”

US President Joe Biden, joined by US First Lady Jill Biden, places a flower on a wreath during the National Peace Officers Memorial Service at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on May 15, 2022. (Photo by Stefani Reynolds / AFP) (Photo by STEFANI REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

President Joe Biden, joined by first lady Jill Biden, places a flower on a wreath during the National Peace Officers Memorial Service at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC, on May 15, 2022. (STEFANI REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

Biden thanked police organizations for their “constructive role” in police reform but called for more action on the issue.

“We haven’t gotten there yet,” he said. “We must get there to strengthen public trust in public safety.”

Biden spoke about enormous levels of federal funding provided to communities after the coronavirus pandemic, encouraging state and local officials to spend more on law enforcement.

“I’m committed to being your partner as I always have,” he said, without mentioning his endorsement of redirecting funding from police departments during the 2020 campaign.

During his speech, Biden advised police officers to do more to engage with the communities they are policing.

“Not one cop in a car but two walking the street, cops who walk the beat, who know the neighborhood, who can restore trust and safety,” he said.

Biden complained that he “inherited” the coronavirus pandemic from his predecessor former President Donald Trump and that people were still suffering the consequences of the lockdowns.

“So many young and old because of this pandemic need help,” he said.

He called for more government social workers to provide housing, education, drug treatment, and mental health for communities that could work alongside police officers.

Biden tried to sympathize with the families of slain police officers, reminding them of his son Beau Biden who died of cancer.

“To the families, Jill and I, we have some idea of how hard it is,” he said. “But I promise you, the day will come. When the memory of your loved ones — you open the closet door and smell the scent, you go by the park used to walk in, you hear that song. A day will come when it will bring a smile to your lips before it brings a tear to your eyes.”


Scott Morrison Recommits to Protecting Freedom of Religion – Can He Do It?

Scott Morrison Recommits to Protecting Freedom of Religion – Can He Do It?

Two weeks out from the federal election, Scott Morrison (LNP) has doubled down on his commitment to introduce protections for faith communities who conscientiously object to assimilating with LGBTQ+ ideology, particularly transgenderism and same-sex “marriage”.

In a letter to David Adler — the President of the Australian Jewish Association — the Australian Prime Minister again declared his support for freedom of religion “without discrimination”.

He told Adler: religious freedom is “fundamental to who we are and who we must be as a tolerant, multicultural, and multi-faith liberal democracy”.

Labor Interference

Morrison then blamed Australian opposition leader Anthony Albanese (Labor) for the original Religious Discrimination Bill being pulled.

Morrison accused Labor of using the original bill to “score a political victory against the Government”, putting their own gain ahead of “achieving laws to protect Australians of religious faith against discrimination.”

He further explained to AJA that,

“Labor supported amendments which hallowed out the protections, using the Bill as a device to make unacceptable changes to other laws that would further undermine the ability of religious institutions, particularly religious schools, to practice their faith.”

Addressing Adler, Morrison declared that unless a “consensus can be found”, and “issues created by the amendments resolved”, he cannot “in good conscious risk a Labor-led removal of current laws protecting freedom of religion”.

Morrison concluded the letter with the reassurance of pursuing an undefiled Religious Discrimination Bill, if re-elected.

The AJA shared the letter to their social media sites on Monday, adding,

 “AJA was involved in consultations with Attorney-General Senator Michaela Cash on the Religious Discrimination Bill. The legislation failed to pass.”

Two-Faced ALP

Confirming Morrison’s criticism, Australian Labor promised to “legislate a religious discrimination act”, then stabbed that in the back, stating that if elected, Labor would ban faith-based schools from exercising their right to conscientious objection, removing the right of faith-based entities to only hire those who share their values, and adhere to their beliefs.

It’s this politicising that drove organisations like the Canberra Declaration (CD) to remove their initial support for the Bill.

Editor Kurt Mahlburg explained in February that the watering down of the Bill was an abandonment of Christian schools from both sides of politics.

Summarising reasons for CD pulling its support, Kurt cited the removal of “key protections for religious schools”, calling it a “dreadful compromise”.

The Canberra Declaration was joined by the Australian Christian Lobby and the National Civic Council, with ACL’s Wendy Francis stating: “the removal of legal protections for Christian schools was a price too high to pay.”


Morrison’s recommitment to a Religious Discrimination Bill coincides with a rising number of Christians being penalised or forced out of their profession for affirming Biblically-backed biological science.

Examples include Dr Jereth Kok, a general practitioner with 15 years of experience, suspended by the Medical Board of Australia for posting material to his private social media pages which align with his Christian faith.

Other examples are Israel Folau and Margaret Court, both of whom have been targeted for non-compliance with the post-SSM liberty-killing “new normal.”

More recently, Sergeant Bruno Staffieri, a veteran LEO serving with the Victorian Police, is facing punishment for private online posts he put up affirming binary, biological facts about gender.

He allegedly commented online to a senior project officer,

“So you are doing tertiary education studying genders. I’ll make it easy for you to pass… there are 2.”

The Age said Staffieri’s biggest crime is him allegedly criticising Victorian Police’s assimilation with the LGBTQ+ political religion.

Age reporter Cameron Houston labelled Staffieri’s situation a,

“Test case for freedom of speech, and the force’s recently revised Social Media policy, particularly for officers expressing religious or political opinions online.”

With the dead weight brought on by appeasing woke Liberals in his ranks, Scott Morrison’s promise to reissue a Religious Discrimination Bill untainted by far-left woke jihadists will be a difficult task.

It’s also unclear if the Prime Minister, who was silent on the “no jab, no job” frenzy that swept through the country, can protect religious freedom — and by default, conscientious objection.

Scott Morrison proved weak by making no real effort to preserve informed consent. He failed to oppose vaccine mandates, the climax of two years of COVID-19 mass hysteria which both the government and legacy media were largely responsible for creating.

Perhaps Morrison’s best chance is reframing the Bill as a defence of conscientious objection.

If re-elected, Morrison could argue on the grounds of freedom of conscience. We all have the right not to bow in worship before the protected LGBTQ+ political class; at the same time, people are free to go along with them if they wish. It is a conscience issue. Not agreeing with someone’s behaviour does not mean that you hate them. Christians are commanded to love all. Freedom of conscience is a fundamental right.


Photo: Australian Jewish News

Thank the Source

Victorian Policeman Faces Disciplinary Action for Saying ‘There Are Two Genders’

Victorian Policeman Faces Disciplinary Action for Saying ‘There Are Two Genders’

Political correctness has infected our law-keepers. It is now considered taboo to state the basic biological fact that humanity comes in two genders: male and female. Sergeant Staffieri should be commended for his courage in speaking up against the prevailing untrue narrative being foisted upon us all.

A Victorian policeman is under investigation for posting online that there are only two genders.

And so he should be!

Everyone knows there are actually three genders: Males (pronouns he/him), Females (pronouns she/her) and Narcissists (pronouns me!/me!/me!).

The Age reported this week that 62-year-old Sergeant Bruno Staffieri was interviewed by officers from Professional Standards Command over an online comment he made to an officer working in the Gender Equality and Inclusion Command.

Staffieri reportedly wrote:

“So you are doing tertiary education studying genders. I’ll make it easy for you to pass… there are 2.”

Someone call 000!


You have to hand it to Victoria Police; they know what constitutes inappropriate behaviour.

Shoot peaceful protestors with rubber bullets? No consequences.

Pepper spray law-abiding citizens? No consequences.

Harass old ladies sitting in a park during Covid lockdown? No consequences.

Slam people into the pavement for not wearing a mask? No consequences.

But if you dare to state a biological fact, everyone — from the Deputy Commissioner down — wets their pants.

Sergeant Staffieri should demand to know how many genders there are, so that he can be more accurate in future.

We’ll wait for the answer.

Oh, and if you’re the victim of an actual offence, you’ll have to wait too. Police are busy attending to thought crimes.


Staffieri, who has been an officer for more than 35 years and is close to retirement, could lose his job because of the online comments.

This is not the first time Staffieri has upset police command with views that, until five minutes ago, were entirely unremarkable.

Staffieri was also investigated over his public criticism of the government’s decision to cancel Australia Day and Anzac Day celebrations last year, but allow the Gay Pride March in St Kilda to proceed.

“So the next time Australians are sent out to fight a war, maybe we can send out the 8000 that marched today… and try to stop the enemy by waving feathers and brightly coloured boas at them,” Staffieri reportedly posted on May 17, 2021.

“Triple 0. What’s your emergency?”

“Sergent Staffieri objected to the Mardi Gras.”

“Does anyone need help?”

“Yes. We are all very hurty.”

“Does Sergeant Staffieri have a weapon?”

“It’s his words. His words! Words are violence. ”

“Stay in a safe space and practice socially distancing until a squad car full of thought police arrives.”


In June last year, Victoria Police Deputy Commissioner Neil Paterson posted on Yammer, the force’s internal communication platform, that:

 “Victoria Police is proud to have been recognised as a silver employer at the 2021 Australian LGBTQ+ inclusion awards.”

Staffieri reportedly responded by posting:

“Yes, I agree. Great achievement. But if the public knew how much time, effort and taxpayer dollars went into this, they would also be demanding why we didn’t get a gold.”

That’s pretty funny.

Paterson didn’t think so. He defended the campaign and denied it had received significant public funding.

Deputy Commissioner Neil Paterson

Deputy Commissioner Neil Paterson

Staffieri responded:

“Sir, I totally value and respect your opinion and your rank, I simply ask that you value and respect mine.”

Paterson fired back at Staffieri …

“I don’t respect or value your views as they are offensive and there is no place for those views in Victoria Police… Either limit your comments on Yammer to comments that are respectful of everyone or consider your employment options.”

So in Daniel Andrews’ Victoria, it’s an honest police officer who tells the truth who is threatened with the sack for having what police hierarchy call “those views”.

Maybe, if Sergeant Staffieri flies the Chinese flag outside his station, all will be forgiven.


Originally published at The James Macpherson Report.
Subscribe to his Substack here for daily witty commentary.

Thank the Source



Jim Crenshaw – April 15th, 2022

The Pfizer vaccine was not the only thing that killed her. Her stupid parents killed her. Parents need to wake the f up and stop killing their children. Source: Covid Vax Injuries.

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation


XANDREWX – April 14th, 2022

Aussie Cossack Youtube Channel Here

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation



FallCabal – April 14th, 2022

Part 22: Covid-19: Part 5 of multiple episodes about the biggest medical scam of all times.

By Janet Ossebaard & Cyntha Koeter
Music: Alexander Nakarada

This is part 22 of God-knows-how-many-parts-in-total. Part 23 will be uploaded as soon as it’s ready. If you liked this part, please consider supporting our work:
We make these documentaries without being paid, so any donation – no matter how small – is most welcome! This way we can continue giving our work to the world for free, in order to wake up as many people as possible…

Join our FallCabal Telegram Platform for free daily updates:
And don’t forget to subscribe to

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation


Please help truthPeep spread the word :)