WELCOME TO THE NWO GULAG — James Perloff

SGT Report – Feb 2nd, 2023


Get 24 filling grams of clean, pasture-raised, premium protein per serving in a creamy ice-cream shake flavor: http://lowcarbwithsgt.com/
Get It Today for 51% OFF ^^ CLICK NOW^^

James Perloff returns to SGT Report to expose the United Nations Agenda 2030 New World Order World Economic Forum plan for 15-minute gulags where human freedom will go to die.
https://jamesperloff.net/


SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

Pfizer knew its vaxx was a killer when it was rolled out by the D of D Operation Warp Speed

Pfizer knew its vaxx was a killer when it was rolled out by the D of D Operation Warp Speed

By Lyndesy Symonds

The bioweapon for the Australian CoVID Regime of the United [Communist] Nations is working just fine.

It is being deployed in within the legal, judicial, health and military framework of ‘the Kill Box’ . This is a military term which describes a construction that every member nation of the United [Communist] Nations is engaged in putting together under the WHO so that the bioweapon of the CoVID vaxx can be deployed as part of a military operation.

Contrary to popular imagination, the WHO is not a ‘Health’ Agency but is the military arm of the UN. And it has been tasked with depopulation in accordance with the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals.

The multi-lateral partners like WEF, Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, manufactured billionaire foundations are tasked with sections of the Operation only.

In Australia, a essential piece of legislation for the construction of the Australian ‘Kill Box” was the Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force Response to Emergencies) Bill 2020. This law amended the Defence Act 1903 (Defence Act) and the Defence Reserve Service (Protection) Act 2001 (DRSP Act). Its purpose was to enable Operation CoVID Shield, to enable foreign security forces to be deployed on Australian soil and to task and indemnify them from all criminal and and civil liabilities under Operation CoVID Shield. Its cover-story in Big Jew msm and the government was to facilitate the streamline for calling out members of the ADF Reserves, provide the Minister with certain powers to direct use of the ADF in an emergency, and to provide immunities to certain personnel while they are performing duties to support civil emergency and disaster preparedness, recovery and response.

The trail of contracts / contacts involved in this world-wide operation began to come into view with the discovery of evidence when the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency filed suit against the FDA for its refusal to provide the PHMPT with its data on Pfizer’s CoVID-19 ‘vaccine biological product file’.

Sept 16 , 2021.  PHMPT filed suit against the FDA in the US District Court, Northern District Texas.
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/001-Complaint-101021.pdf

United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Case 4:21-cv-01058-P
Document 1 Filed: Sept 16 2021
Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, Plaintiff
against
Food and Drug Administration, Defendant

Most of the comment on this case has centred around the release of the secret FDA-Pfizer report on the adversities of the vaxx. And it is shocking what Pfizer absolutely, positively knew when the vaxx was rolled out in the US under Operation Warp Speed.

But the Texas Court found that the FDA had no case to answer. That is the real eye-opener. Why?

The FDA successfully defended the case brought against them by the PHMPT.  They received  a ‘no case to answer’ judgement on the basis that they had no contractual obligation to test their vaxx for anything.  Their contract was only to deliver the vaxx.  Nothing more. Pfizer’s contract was with the Department of Defense, not the FDA or CDC or any health agency of the government.

And I will bet you any money that Pfizer’s contract will be the same here in Australia.

These health agencies and regulatory agencies are running cover for defence departments which are tasked under the WHO – the military arm of the United [Communist] Nations. And they are making a Kill Box.

The DOD Global Experiment
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ndG3QwHanVAa/

Source

Our Big Tech Overlords Yanked Yet Another Covid Video We Apparently Can’t Handle

Our Big Tech Overlords Yanked Yet Another Covid Video We Apparently Can’t Handle

YouTube has pulled yet another Project Veritas video.

The now-infamous video of Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer’s director of research and development in strategic operations and mRNA scientific planning, giving up information on #DirectedEvolution and Pfizer’s plan to continue profiting from the Covid vaccines is still available in full on Rumble.

As Tucker Carlson introduced the story Thursday night, he said:

Consider the story that did not break today. … In the 24 hours since Project Veritas posted this footage, it has been viewed more than 12 million times on Twitter. No other media outlet has covered this story at all. … [You’d think you could] just go online and find out about it. Well Google, the biggest search engine in the world, which has a monopoly on search in this country … appears to have gone out of its way to make it much more difficult for users to learn anything about the Pfizer executive pictured in the footage.

Apparently, Carlson’s sources found what so many others suspected immediately after the Project Veritas story broke — that Google appeared to mask and misdirect its search results almost immediately. That seems as clear a sign as any of the collusion between Big Pharma and Big Tech.

That’s not a far-fetched accusation. Consider The Wall Street Journal’s 2019 investigation, “How Google Interferes With Its Search Algorithms and Changes Your Results.” Among other things, they found, “Despite publicly denying doing so, Google keeps blacklists to remove certain sites or prevent others from surfacing in certain types of results.” Imagine how they’ve perfected this in the last few years.

By Friday evening, YouTube yanked Project Veritas’s Pfizer video, which had 800,000 views before it was censored. Luckily, it was still alive and well on Twitter with 20 million views.

After that, Rumble tweeted:

UPDATE: It seems like YouTube has removed @Project_Veritas’s video. In response, Rumble will hold the line against this outrageous censorship by keeping the video up and even featuring it on our homepage.

Censorship dies on Rumble.

Accusations of YouTube “censorship” have been rampant: from issues related to the Jan. 6 Committee and Covid vaccines, to climate change and public appearances by former President Donald Trump (presumably because he continues to question the results of the 2020 election; however, Google began censoring him long before that, supposedly for “false accusations” about Joe Biden.)

Holding Big Tech Accountable

One has to wonder how long we are going to tolerate sources such as Google/YouTube deciding what we should or shouldn’t see. Freedom-loving Americans should be actively pursuing lawsuits to hold these monolithic companies accountable.

In this regard, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. should be commended for his work. Kennedy, along with multiple other plaintiffs, filed a lawsuit on Jan. 10 making antitrust and constitutional claims against corporate media outlets. The suit alleges the Trusted News Initiative (TNI), an industry partnership started in March 2020 by several of the world’s largest news organizations, partnered with Big Tech firms to collectively censor online news. Google/YouTube is one of the “core partners” of the TNI.

This is a huge step in the right direction. Yet even now, as many people are waking up to the fact that their friends and loved ones may have been harmed by mRNA shots marketed as “vaccines,” there is no great public backlash against YouTube for censoring questions or warnings that might have informed the public about the risks of the Covid jabs.

Big Tech Runs Roughshod

Large YouTube channels such as Russell Brand’s and Dr. John Campbell’s still have to speak vaguely about anything Covid-related to their millions of subscribers, just so they won’t get shut down — as if they lived under communist or fascist rule.

The bottom line is that Big Tech is running roughshod over us. Beginning with YouTube’s Chief Executive Officer Susan Wojcicki, and on up the ladder to Google and parent company Alphabet, headed by Sundar Pichai, it becomes clear that the looming elephant in the room has grown too big. Imagine a 21st-century, augmented reality version of “You can’t fight city hall.”

“Every single CEO supposedly for the last 20 years has been talking about the free and open internet,” explains Rumble CEO Chris Pavlovski. “They’ve been parading like the most important thing is to not regulate the internet and keep it free and open. Then all of a sudden in the last three or four years, everyone’s parading the opposite: Let’s censor it and let’s have a controlled internet. Never in my life could I ever have imagined that happening.”

In a Fox Nation special earlier this month that everyone concerned with censorship and free speech should watch, Pavlovski sat down with Carlson to discuss internet suppression and the birth of Rumble. It is an eye-opening explanation of how our digital information works, and of the uphill battle we face in taking back our First Amendment rights.

Pavlovski explained:

These companies all respectively have a monopoly on their certain division of the internet: Google is search, YouTube is video, Twitter is microblogging, and Facebook is social networking. … It’s a fun party for them. … Think about how big these companies are in comparison to the railroads and the tobacco companies in [the early 20th century] — these are even more powerful and have even more control than those companies did at that time. … So I don’t think they want to let that go. They’ve certainly abused their power.

Backlash for Critics

And don’t think Pavlovski hasn’t already felt a backlash after his appearance on Fox Nation. Less than 10 days later, Rolling Stone ran a piece titled, “Far-Right Superstars Are Failing on Rumble. Who’s Winning?

Rolling Stone is part of the Penske Media Corporation (PMC), a growing near-monopoly run by billionaire media tycoon Jay Penske. In July 2021, PMC brought in Noah Shachtman, former editor at The Daily Beast, to be Rolling Stone’s new editor-in-chief. A former Bill Clinton campaign staffer, it’s clear in which direction his bias lies.

In order to give Rumble a thorough dissing, Rolling Stone sought out E. Rosalie Li, “a public health scholar and disinformation researcher at Johns Hopkins University.” She also runs Hoaxlines, an organization that researches “media manipulation and unethical efforts to influence the public.” Li explains that Covid lockdowns “scared people who believed that the government was dangerous.” She then laments that there was “life-threatening” information posted on different platforms, and not enough of it was removed concerning Covid and the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. As a result, the masses fell victim to “conspiracy theories.”

The article then launches into a full-blown justification for censorship, quoting yet another misinformation expert, and explaining that as the masses peruse various internet platforms, they are becoming affiliated with like-minded believers. This, they claim, is dangerous because together they will morph into extremists spreading evil misinformation. And that can’t be allowed to happen.

It’s clear that with the rise of “misinformation experts” (there are currently 245 such code-worded job openings on Indeed), YouTube isn’t about to back down in its assault on free speech.

Lawsuits Offer Hope

Luckily, there are some targeted lawsuits coming before the courts, including the Supreme Court, that will challenge Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This law “grants a liability shield to internet platforms that protects them from being held responsible for their users’ posts, while also allowing them to decide what stays up or comes down,” CNBC reports. These cases, outlined here, will help determine the bounds of free expression on the internet.

In the last few years, thanks to cancel culture and the seemingly unbridled power of Big Tech, we’ve come to understand how fragile free speech really is.

Project Veritas’ James O’Keefe recently copied YouTube’s CEO Wojcicki on a tweet to Elon Musk, asking him how much it would cost to buy YouTube. He’s got a point. In the short term, we may be left praying that Musk or other benevolent billionaires can come to the aid of saving the First Amendment. There is no future for America without it.


Source

Meanwhile in Australia they’re pushing the 5th dose

Free Your Mind – January 30th, 2023



SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

WE THOUGHT THE ANTI-VAXXERS WERE SILLY THEN MY DAUGHTER DROPS DEAD

OH MY GOD – January 30th, 2023


IT IS OUR CIVIL AND MORAL DUTY TO DO OUR BEST TO BREAK THE WALL OF CENSORSHIP AND TELL THE TRUTH TO THOSE WHO HAVE NOT SEEN IT YET.


SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

More Evidence the FDA Works for Pfizer as FDA Asks Pfizer to Submit Cancer Drug for Expanded Approval with Zero New Trials

More Evidence the FDA Works for Pfizer as FDA Asks Pfizer to Submit Cancer Drug for Expanded Approval with Zero New Trials

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

As the alternative media is distracted by the unfounded claim that Pfizer is using gain of function technology to develop new variants of COVID for future vaccines, Pfizer is quietly working together with the FDA to build their portfolio of drugs to make up for the loss of income due to decreasing numbers of people willing to continue getting injected with COVID shots.

The evidence that Pfizer controls the FDA continues to mount.

We previously reported how Pfizer virtually came out of nowhere to secure the first FDA authorization for experimental COVID shots in 2020, when the two drug companies that had received the most funding and attention to become the first ones to obtain the FDA nod for a new COVID “vaccine” had been Moderna, with their close links to Anthony Fauci and the NIH, and Astrazenca with its close links to Bill Gates.

Pfizer’s contract with Operation Warp Speed to receive funding for COVID-19 vaccines was different than the other pharmaceutical companies, because it was conditioned on them gaining FDA approval, and it did not include intellectual property rights for the U.S. government.

It appears that this opened the door for them to grant an exclusive deal with Israel in exchange for data on how the experimental shots affected people in Israel, effectively making Israel and its citizens lab rats. See:

Trump Claims he could “Easily” be Israeli PM – Is this why Pfizer Received First COVID Vaccine Authorization in U.S. and Exclusive Rights in Israel?

And a year before Pfizer became a late entry in the contest to get the first FDA authorization for a COVID shot, Dr. Scott Gottlieb joined the Board of Directors for Pfizer in June of 2019, just two months after he finished his term as Commissioner of the FDA under President Trump.

A year later, Operation Warp Speed awarded Pfizer almost $2 Billion to develop the COVID shot. See:

Former FDA Director Gottlieb Now Pfizer Board Member Secures $1.95 BILLION for COVID Vaccine

This week, Pfizer reported that they expect the sale of their COVID-19 shots and their antiviral Paxlovid to dramatically decrease here in 2023:

Despite a plan to jack up the price of Comirnaty to between $110 and $130 per dose when the United States goes to a commercial model this year for COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer expects revenue from the shot to plummet by 64% in 2023.

Pfizer also expects a 58% decrease in revenue from COVID-19 oral antiviral Paxlovid. The company revealed its 2023 expectations in its fourth quarter and 2022 full-year earnings report on Tuesday.

With the decreases, Pfizer is guiding to a revenue window of $67 billion to $71 billion in 2023.

The projections—which fell short of analyst expectations—put a damper on what might have been a day of celebration as Pfizer reported $100.3 billion in revenue for 2022, after generating $81.3 billion in sales in 2021. (Source.)

But what surprised people in the pharmaceutical industry the most about Pfizer’s forecast for 2023, was that in a “mysterious” FDA approval that was not reported in the media at the end of 2022, Pfizer received expanded use approval for their breast cancer drug Ibrance, and reportedly, the FDA is the one who approached them to expand the use of this drug!

Angus Liu of Fierce Pharma reported:

It’s unusual to have the FDA chase down a pharma company and ask them apply for a new drug indication. But Pfizer went through just that and has now quietly revealed a label expansion for blockbuster breast cancer med Ibrance.

The FDA has extended Ibrance’s approval in combination with an aromatase inhibitor to include newly diagnosed HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients regardless of menopausal status, Pfizer said Tuesday.

Previously, the combination of Ibrance and an aromatase inhibitor was limited to use in postmenopausal women. The FDA granted the new approval in mid-December, according to an approval letter (PDF), but Pfizer snuck the news into its fourth-quarter earnings announcement Tuesday.

There are other unconventional elements in this approval beyond Pfizer’s late, low-profile revelation.

For one, a review of Ibrance’s updated prescription information (PDF) shows no new efficacy data in the patient population.

The clinical efficacy section of Ibrance’s label still only includes results from the phase 3 PALOMA-2 trial—which tested a combination of Ibrance and Novartis’ aromatase inhibitor Femara in postmenopausal women newly diagnosed with HR+/HER2- breast cancer—and from the phase 3 PALOMA-3 study. The latter study tested Ibrance with AstraZeneca’s SERD drug Faslodex in previously treated patients regardless of menopausal status.

It was the FDA that proactively reached out to Pfizer in this case. In December 2021, the FDA requested that Pfizer file an application to include pre/perimenopausal women in Ibrance’s label, according to an FDA approval letter dated Dec. 13, 2022. Pfizer responded to the FDA’s request and submitted its application on March 11, 2022, the approval letter shows.

The new approval comes as Ibrance is under increased pressure from Novartis’ Kisqali and Eli Lilly’s Verzenio, particularly after the final overall survival analysis of the PALOMA-2 trial found Ibrance didn’t significantly improve patients’ life expectancy.

The unusual approval raises a question around the basis of FDA’s decision to request—and then approve—the Ibrance expansion. (Full article.)

Is there any doubt anymore about who controls the FDA? Pfizer is the largest criminal organization in the world, and they would not be able to continue earning huge profits without their control of the FDA.

And how many of you reading this article are co-owners and therefore co-conspirators with the criminal Pfizer company because your retirement fund owns stock in this company? How many members of Congress or State politicians own stock in this criminal organization?

See Also:

Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through

How to Determine if you are a Disciple of Jesus Christ or Not

Synagogue of Satan: Why It’s Time to Leave the Corporate Christian Church

Has Everyone Left You Because You are not Ashamed to Speak the Truth? Stay the Course!

When the World is Against You – God’s Power to Intervene for Those Who Resist

An Idolatrous Nation Celebrates “Freedom” Even Though They are Slaves to the Pharmaceutical Cult

What Happens When a Holy and Righteous God Gets Angry? Lessons from History and the Prophet Jeremiah

The Most Important Truth about the Coming “New World Order” Almost Nobody is Discussing

Insider Exposes Freemasonry as the World’s Oldest Secret Religion and the Luciferian Plans for The New World Order

Identifying the Luciferian Globalists Implementing the New World Order – Who are the “Jews”?

Published on January 31, 2023

Source

Breaking the Silence: Do mRNA Vaccine Harms Outweigh Benefits?

As someone who has always questioned the safety and efficacy of the Covid ‘injectables’, I’ve thought long and hard about why more doctors haven’t voiced concerns, why so many seem unaware of the documented side effects, and why so few are sounding the alarm.

To help me answer this question, I spoke with renowned UK cardiologist and heart-health campaigner Dr Aseem Malhotra, who has been breaking the silence.

‘Double-jabbed’ Malhotra originally supported the program, until a series of events sent him digging into the evidence. What he discovered alarmed him and resulted in the publication of two evidence-based, peer-reviewed papers along with a call for the immediate suspension of the Covid mRNA roll-out. He tells his story:

‘Despite being one of pharma’s biggest critics, I could not have expected or conceived of the possibility that these vaccines, these new vaccines, could cause harm. So very early on I was one of the first to have two doses of the Pfizer vaccine, and I helped out at a vaccine centre in January 2021.

About a month later I had a conversation with a friend of mine, film director Gurinder Chadha (who was) vaccine hesitant. I said to her, “Listen, traditional vaccines are still one of the safest pharmacological interventions in the history of medicine. That doesn’t mean that all vaccines are completely safe. No drug is completely safe. But when you compare them to other pharmacological interventions I’ve talked about and campaigned on, for example diabetes drugs, blood pressure pills or statins, they are far, far safer.”’

Personal Loss

Malhotra further explains his view during a Good Morning Britain interview.

‘I said, “There are rational concerns for vaccine hesitancy and irrational concerns. The rational concerns are when looking at what the pharmaceutical industry has done for years — they’ve been found guilty of fraud on many occasions — and prescribed medications are the third most common cause of death after heart disease and cancer.” So, I was being open, and I felt compassion for people who were vaccine-hesitant. And I said, “In my opinion, as it stands at the moment, traditional vaccines are the safest.”

‘Six months later my father suffered an unexplained… cardiac arrest. The post-mortem didn’t make sense, he was a very fit guy, yet he had very severe narrowings of two of his coronary arteries. I had known his cardiac history inside out, we had done imaging on him a few years earlier. I found myself thinking “hold on a minute, he’s got a rapid progression of coronary artery disease when he’s doing really well during lockdown, walking 10,000 steps a day and eating well. This doesn’t make sense.“ And I could only attribute it at the time to stress, I couldn’t think of any other reason.’

Over the following months, emerging data led Malhotra to question whether the vaccine was linked to his father’s death. The first was an abstract published in Circulation (November 8, 2021) by US cardiothoracic surgeon, Dr Steven Gundry, who followed several hundred of his patients after the mRNA (Moderna/Pfizer) jabs. Gundry found that inflammatory markers correlated with heart disease risk went through the roof. On average, that change increased the risk of those people having a heart attack or stroke within the next five years, from 11 per cent up to 25 per cent. This increase in risk is massive.

Cover-Up

The next event raised more alarm bells for Malhotra.

‘Within two weeks of that abstract, a whistle-blower contacted me from a prestigious institution in the country, and said that a group of researchers had accidentally found through imaging studies that mRNA vaccines were increasing heart attack risk through inflammation, but the lead researcher said they were not going to publish these findings because it may affect funding from pharma.

‘I then felt a duty and contacted GB News saying, “There is a Circulation abstract but also something else I’ve heard,” and I spoke about it on GB News. That interview went viral … with me raising questions and saying, “We need to investigate this.”’

The pushback was strong.

‘One very prestigious medical body that I am affiliated with received a number of anonymous complaints from doctors that I was bringing the medical profession into disrepute, and that as I was in an association with them, I was bringing them into disrepute. I was then asked to formally respond,’ he relates. Malhotra responded and let off with a warning.

Assessment

This experience made him realise how difficult it would be to publicly expose things, so he decided to critically appraise the evidence himself.

‘When I broke the data down, it became very clear, the harms of the mRNA vaccine massively outweigh the benefits. It was not even close! And that’s based on the highest level of quality of data we will ever have.’

The evidence comes from the original double-blind, randomised control trials, that led to the approval of both Pfizer and Moderna by regulators worldwide. Malhotra explains,

‘In a reanalysis of the original trials with the Wuhan strain, eminent scientists essentially found you were more likely to suffer a serious adverse event — for example hospitalisation, disability, or a life-changing event – than you were to be hospitalised with Covid. That means, in essence, the mRNA vaccine should likely never, ever have been approved for anybody in the first place.’

He continues:

‘The randomised control trial data showed a risk of serious adverse events of at least 1 in 800 within two months. It’s probably much higher than that as you go forward because one of the mechanisms is accelerated heart disease. My dad died six months after the second dose of the vaccine; many people are going to be dropping dead and having heart attacks months after having the vaccine because it accelerates coronary artery disease.

But other vaccines have been pulled for far less: the swine flu vaccine was withdrawn in 1976 following episodes of Guillain Barre syndrome at a rate of 1/100,000; rotavirus vaccine was withdrawn in 1999 for causing a form of bowel obstruction (intussusception) in 1/10,000; this is 1/800 at least. So, it’s a no-brainer. The question is: why have they not pulled it? Some say, “It was an emergency use authorisation.” Well, it’s no longer an emergency.’

This begs the question: if the evidence is now so clear, why does the silence continue? Well, I’m glad you asked. In a follow-up article, I will explore the factors contributing to the great silence — hint, it’s not just AHPRA — and how we can move from here.

Encouragingly, if recent events are anything to go by, the silence is (slowly) breaking. The past few weeks have seen appearances by doctors on mainstream media voicing jab safety concerns, including Australia’s Dr Kerryn Phelps, and Malhotra’s recent truth bomb drop on a live BBC broadcast receiving millions of views on Twitter. Thanks Elon.

They are joined by other eminent professors and clinicians sounding the alarm and calling for governments to ‘Stop the Shots’.

____

Originally published in Spectator Australia. Photo by Maksim Goncharenok.

Thank the Source

Media, Big Tech take pains to bury Big Pharma Project Veritas Video

Media, Big Tech take pains to bury Big Pharma Project Veritas Video


FDA declines to say whether it asked Pfizer for explanation of undercover video. Tucker Carlson producer claims Google staffer “call[ed] us to kill the story.” Tabloid quickly erases report with no explanation.

By Greg Piper

Undercover video that purportedly shows a Pfizer executive explaining the company’s “directed evolution” plan to keep COVID-19 a “cash cow,” then furiously backpedaling when Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe exposes the ruse, has drawn intense curiosity from members of Congress and intermittent Big Tech throttling and a partial media blackout.

Despite the fact that the figure identified as Jordon Walker belatedly called himself a “liar … trying to impress a person on a date,” played the race card in requesting police involvement, and physically attacked O’Keefe and the film crew, a prominent tabloid inexplicably removed its article on the sting.

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) demanded a congressional investigation of “vaccine manufacturers and the entire COVID vaccine approval process,” while Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) asked Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla to explain the company’s actual or possible plans to mutate SARS-CoV-2 and any related discussions with industry peers or government officials.

The FDA declined either to answer whether it was following up with Pfizer for an explanation of the figure’s comments or give the agency’s interpretation of the video, telling Just the News to contact Pfizer, which has not responded to queries going back to Thursday afternoon.

The figure identified as Walker claimed regulators would not closely scrutinize Pfizer’s “exploratory” efforts because of the revolving door between government officials and pharmaceutical companies. Former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb joined Pfizer’s board two months after leaving the Trump administration.

The sting victim also previewed a potential explanation from Pfizer to Congress by denying to his fraudulent date that “directed evolution” is “gain-of-function” research, the subject of ongoing inquiries from lawmakers. He speculated the initial Wuhan COVID outbreak was the result of insufficiently controlled mutations.

Search engines are giving unexpected results for the controversy. Neither Google nor privacy-focused Brave, which last year poached users upset with DuckDuckGo’s pledge to bury Russian “disinformation,” returned first-page results from Project Veritas itself in Just the News searches for “project veritas pfizer.”

Both surface purported fact-checks of the video and the trickle of mainstream media coverage in The Hill and local media, and both included an October 2021 fact-check of an earlier Project Veritas video about Pfizer.

Newsweek’s fact-check begins by aiming to discredit Project Veritas based on previous mainstream media fact-checks and then analyzes it line by line, at one point downplaying the potential problems gain-of-function research can cause.

Several Twitter users shared Google screenshots reading “results are changing quickly” and explaining that “reliable” information was still indexing. The recurring misspelling of Walker’s first name in searches didn’t prompt Google to suggest his correct name as it typically does with typos.

Google hid primary sources, including Walker’s LinkedIn page, which Brave did return in its pre-scrubbed form as of Wednesday night, confirming Walker’s role at Pfizer.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson highlighted Google’s then-blackout of the controversy on his Thursday program, saying it illustrates the power of the pharmaceutical industry. Carlson’s producer Gregg Re claimed that a Google staffer who used to work for Fox “call[ed] us to kill the story.”

Sen. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) told Carlson this was par for the course with Google, which, he alleged, “changed their algorithm to benefit Joe Biden” during the general election campaign, rigs results to promote Google’s favored views, and has showered campaign cash on both parties to evade accountability.

Brave Software Head of Communications Catherine Corre told Just the News the old fact-check about Project Veritas showed up high in results because the source, the Poynter Institute, made an “invisible” meta tag update a few days ago, meaning the page “was labeled as ‘fresh’” in Brave’s search engine. It’s fixing the bug, she said.

“Brave Search is an independent search engine and we do not censor results,” nor does it apply blocks or rules to disfavor content other than child sexual abuse material, Corre said. “We do not prioritize so-called ‘fact checkers’ in any way.” She didn’t answer why Project Veritas itself didn’t appear in first-page results, but said its rankings depend on “relevancy to the query, freshness, page popularity, etc.”

Google didn’t answer Re’s claim about trying to kill Carlson’s story but told Just the News the “changing quickly” notices have been triggered millions of times since the feature’s rollout a year and half ago.

They appear automatically when “a range of sources have not yet weighed in” and they don’t block results, a Google spokesperson said. The query “herschel urged woman abortion she says,” referring to recent U.S. Senate candidate Herschel Walker, provoked the notice, for example.

“Political ideology is not a signal our systems understand” and Google does not “manually manipulate web listings” for ranking purposes, the spokesperson said.

The Daily Mail took down its report on the Project Veritas sting apparently within two hours of going live early Thursday morning, according to an archive of the page and baffled social media users. The report said it has asked Pfizer for comment.

MSN republished the Daily Mail report and removed it just as quickly. That version’s metadata still shows up in Brave results as of Friday afternoon, but Just the News has not been able to find archives or caches. Google slapped the search with the same “changing quickly” label.

Human Events noted the disappearance of the Daily Mail and MSN reports in a story written by Project Veritas Press Secretary R.C. Maxwell, which said neither website responded to questions.

Carlson and social media users speculated the disappearances and broader media blackout, which includes CNN and MSNBC, were related to Pfizer’s heavy advertising spending in mainstream media. The company paused its advertising on Twitter following billionaire Elon Musk’s takeover, according to The Wall Street Journal, due to concerns about a pullback on content moderation.

The Daily Mail, however, has recently run other unflattering Pfizer stories. It reported Friday the FDA found a potentially higher risk of stroke in people who get Pfizer’s bivalent COVID vaccine and a flu shot the same day. It also emphasized Bourla’s pay package and the tripling of Pfizer’s revenue since 2019, when the CEO was accosted by critical journalists at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

_________

RELATED

FDA pulls authorization for AstraZeneca COVID treatment, says it’s ineffective against some variants

*********

(TLB) published  this article  with permission of John Solomon at Just the News.  Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News

Header featured image (edited) credit: Walker/Twitter grab

Emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)