COVID Update: Ivermectin Works

Nation First looks at a new study on Ivermectin showing 92% less chance of COVID-19 mortality.

The establishment tried its best to discourage the use of Ivermectin with COVID-19.

The media openly ridiculed those who pointed out real-world evidence showed the drug could protect against COVID-19.

They largely overlooked the fact that a leading Australian university researcher had already found evidence Ivermectin was effective against COVID-19.

(Interestingly, the last we heard about that ongoing research was half a year ago.)

Propaganda Campaign

A massive misinformation campaign was launched labelling the drug a ‘horse de-wormer’ and falsely stating it to be unfit for human use.

Every public figure from Elon Musk to former US President Donald J. Trump was demonised for advocating the use of Ivermectin, or for actually using it like Joe Rogan did.

In Australia, the medical establishment even banned its use in preventing and treating COVID.

(This was something I, sadly unsuccessfully, campaigned against when I was an Australian Member of Parliament, leading a massive phone-in campaign that actually jammed the Therapeutic Goods Administration switchboard.)

The medical establishment elsewhere around the world followed suit, banning the drug.

Some brave doctors who persisted with using Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID were even fired.

And now, as it turns out, Ivermectin did work.

Breaking News

A new authoritative study conducted by Brazilian scientist Dr Flavio A. Cadegiani provides definitive proof of Ivermectin’s effectiveness against COVID-19.

In his research, he observed that people who used the drug regularly every 15 days for 6 to 8 weeks had a 92 per cent reduced risk of mortality compared to non-users.

Compare that to the mRNA ‘vaccines’ that were practically forced upon people, which offered a far lower and diminishing rate of protection.

If anything, the mRNA-based ‘vaccines’ may have even made people more vulnerable to newer COVID-19 variants.

And, let’s not ignore the whole host of nasty long-term side effects — including sudden death — that came with these ‘vaccines’.

Lost Opportunity

It should be noted that Dr Flavio wasn’t the first to bring to light the effectiveness of Ivermectin.

Back in 2021, many prominent researchers were censored or intimidated into silence about the drug’s effectiveness against COVID-19.

Later on, Dr Harvey Risch, a prominent epidemiologist from Yale, would testify before the US Congress that had the drug been approved for use, it could have potentially saved thousands of lives.

The reason for the hostility that the ‘elite’ showed against what was already a ready solution for COVID-19 was two-fold:

  1. The patent for Ivermectin had expired, meaning that, unlike the new vaccines, there was little profit to be made from the mass use of the drug.
  2. To push the mRNA jabs on the public. For what malign reasons, one can only speculate. My best guess is to further accelerate depopulation as it has been proven that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are actually harming global fertility rates.

Whatever the reasons, if Ivermectin had not been stymied, hundreds of thousands of deaths could have been easily avoided.

It is interesting to note the stark contrast in terms of COVID-19 impact on countries that disallowed the drugs versus those that endorsed it.

Take the example of Mexico, which (at the time of writing) has 53,751 inflection COVID cases per million and 2,508 COVID deaths per million.

The country allowed the off-label use of Ivermectin early during the pandemic, rather than listening to the ‘experts’ in the neighbouring USA, which currently has 291,242 cases per million and 3,222 deaths per million.

The real-world data — and now empirical studies — shows Ivermectin works.

Questions will now need to be answered by those who went out of their way to stop its use.

___

Originally published at Nation First. Photo: fireflyphoto/BigStock

Thank the Source

ZUCKERBERG LOSES FORTUNE AS STOCK MARKET COLLAPSES….

ZUCKERBERG LOSES FORTUNE AS STOCK MARKET COLLAPSES….

STRANGER THAN FICTION NEWS Published September 20, 2022

Follow us on telegram for the latest updates: https://t.me/STFNREPORT

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

President Biden: ‘The Pandemic Is Over’

President Biden: ‘The Pandemic Is Over’

President Joe Biden said Sunday on CBS’s “60 Minutes” that the coronavirus pandemic was over.

The virus was first identified during an outbreak in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Cases reached the United States in early 2020, which caused several states to shut down non-essential businesses and schools beginning in spring 2020. COVID-19 vaccines have been available in various countries since December 2020.

Anchor Scott Pelley said, “Mr. President, first Detroit auto show in three years. Is the pandemic over?”

Biden said, “The pandemic is over. We still have a problem with Covid. We’re still doing a lot of work on it. It’s — but the pandemic is over. If you notice, no one’s wearing masks. Everybody seems to be in pretty good shape. And so I think it’s changing. And I think this is a perfect example of it.”

Follow Pam Key on Twitter @pamkeyNEN

Source

THE BIG RESET

THE BIG RESET

Fearless Nation – September 16th, 2022

The uncensored documentary about the truth of the pandemic.
Source: THE BIG RESET MOVIE

✶ ✯ ► ► FEARLESS NATION ◄ ◄ ✯ ✶
We are all explorers trying to find ourselves…
Some people around you will not understand your journey.
They don’t need to; it’s not for them.

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

New Zealand drops Covid mandates

New Zealand drops Covid mandates

Axios: New Zealand is dropping most pandemic restrictions, Prime Minister Jacinda (Jack) Ardern announced Monday.

Why it matters: NZ once stamped out COVID-19 community cases with some of the world’s toughest measures until the variants arrived and the government phased out its elimination strategy last October.

WEF disciple Jacinda (Jack) Ardern drops Covid scams

Driving the news: Ardern, at a news conference in Wellington, citedthe lowest cases and hospitalizations since February,” a highly vaccinated population and access to antiviral medicines as she announced a phasing out of the government’s pandemic measures.

  • These include the removal of government vaccine mandates on Sept. 26, and international travelers will no longer be required to be vaccinated against COVID or submit results upon arrival from 11:59pm Monday local time.
  • Mask mandates will be lifted in most places from that time.

What they’re saying: “It’s time to safely turn the page on our COVID-19 management,” Ardern said.

  • “We now move on to a simple two-requirements system of masks in healthcare settings and seven days isolation for positive cases only,” Ardern added.
  • “We move forward with confidence knowing that we’re not going to use those measures in the future.”

Go deeper: New Zealand borders fully reopen as COVID travel restrictions end

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen’s nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no ‘government’ of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Source

Post-Pandemic Fear Lives On

Psychologist Dr Wanda Skowronska examines the causes of the general reaction to coronavirus and discusses the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

Many use the term ‘post-pandemic’ of our times, full of hope that the worst events of the past two years are fading. Though some of these excesses have faded into the past, queues in supermarkets, lockdowns, closure of churches and police aggression against protestors, there remains, however, a residual fear, a real existential fear, which can be triggered at any moment.  Some are questioning what really happened, as if it were a bad dream from which they have awakened.

Mass Hysteria

Remember the Belgian psychologist, Mattias Desmet, Professor in Clinical Psychology at Ghent University who noted the widespread fear generated by the Covid pandemic through the phenomenon of ‘mass formation?’ His analysis shot him to fame as people like Dr Robert Malone and virologist Geert Van den Bosche realised he had plumbed the ‘why’ of the sudden single global narrative.

‘Mass formation’ exists, he said, and is a phenomenon that affects groups, societies, and even countries. It explains much of twentieth-century ideological behaviours, where entire nations and groups of nations have bought into a single narrative at the same time — Nazism and Communism being prime examples.

For ‘mass formation’ to happen, Desmet said there have to be some preconditions — first, widespread social alienation/depression, the loss of shared cultural, religious sense, free-floating anxiety and frustration, ever-present, with nowhere to direct it. These were well in place globally in the past decade, particularly in the West. And the process of single narrative ‘mass formation’ that occurred during the Covid years has not gone away.

Uncritical Acceptance

The underlying fear became very evident in the lack of questioning of the testing behind the vaccinations which were foisted on all so quickly. Not to mention the resistance to alternative evidence-based treatments — treatments such as Ivermectin, the anti-parasitic, anti-viral drug, whose initial developers, William C. Campbell, and Satoshi Ōmura, won the Nobel Prize in 2015.

Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs on the face of the earth and its efficacy with Covid was found in 2020 by doctors who were desperate to find some treatment in the absence of early treatment protocols. It was used in India’s Uttar Pradesh, with a population of 240 million people, and virtually eliminated Covid, but was unaccountably sidelined or deleted from consideration.

No one with a scientific mind objects to questioning the efficacy of alternate drugs — some are good, some are not. After all, scientists question the evident facts — that is their job. But to shut down discussion is another thing altogether. Desmet noted the fear among medical professionals and researchers, of even discussing the science behind these vaccines.

Now there are increasing numbers of health leaders and researchers who say that the vaccinations did not work in stopping the spread of the virus, nor were adequate tests done beforehand on their mid and long-term effects. Several countries are recommending a fifth vaccination in little over a year. What is going on?

Hard Data

There are strange anomalies that are repeatedly surfacing. There is the strange fact that countries like Bulgaria which had the lowest European vaccination rate, also had one of the lowest European Covid infection rates, while Spain and Portugal with very high vaccination rates had high Covid infection rates.

There is also the unusual increase in sudden deaths among young people, particularly athletes. Examples include the young bicyclist Rab Wardell who died recently after he won a race, aged 37; rugby player Ben Benn who died aged 30 after a football match; young football player Mollie White who died suddenly; and Dominic Oscar, a boxer who died at 19 — as well as other reports of young, otherwise healthy people dying.

American journalist Mark Steyne states, ‘nothing to see here’ while giving more details of similar cases. He notes that after the vaccinations were introduced, the rate of deaths went up each week. And official statistics from Alberta in Canada list ‘cause unknown’ as the chief cause of death.

Similarly in Germany, statistical analyses show excess mortality in younger age groups after the vaccinations and booster shots. Of course, correlation is not causation, nor are all dying, just some, but as Steyn says, actuaries are asking questions about the evidently excess deaths, in the past year, after the vaccinations were introduced.

Medical Practitioners Speak Up

Then there is the inconvenient truth that the RACGP (Royal Australian College of General Practitioners) candidate, Victorian Dr Julian Fidge, has asked the TGA to overturn its ban on GPs prescribing the anti-parasitic drug to prevent and treat COVID-19’, adding that, ‘doctors who believe it does not work are too “lazy” to check the evidence’. And what are we to make of Obstetrician/Gynaecologist Luke McLindon’s evident concern over the data from his own practice: an evident rise in miscarriages which the media has tried to silence?

There are scientists and researchers who over the past two years have refused to accept the single vaccination narrative and have continued to question the testing process, and evidence of adverse effects higher than with any previous vaccine.

Those who question these anti-Covid vaccinations, and the lack of Phase Three testing (which is supposed to occur with every vaccination), are scientists, virologists, immunologists and Nobel prize-winners — such as Dr Thomas Borody, Dr Seheult, Dr Peter McCullough, Luc Montagnier, Dr Anthony Cardillo, Dr Zelenko, Dr Ryan Cole, Dr Pierre Kory, Dr Tess Lawrie, Dr John Campbell; Dr Robert Malone, Dr Michael Yeadon — among others. They are all accomplished scientists. They are not anti-vaccination — they simply keep asking questions and invite discussion about this vaccination. More than 5,200 doctors and scientists signed ‘The Physicians’ Declaration’, which criticises policymakers for their ‘one-size-fits-all’ COVID-19 treatment strategy, even stating that such restrictions result in ‘needless illness and death.’  Why is their scientific thinking sidelined?

Fear-Driven

Desmet gives an insight here: he says when dissident groups emerge in a time of mass formation, they have virtually no chance of changing the single narrative — as fear drives it, not rational questioning. Questioners arouse the generalised anxiety which existed before the mass formation, which the vaccine narrative had assuaged. And Desmet says that people do not want to be reminded of the anxiety and frustration.

At the same time, he says that the continuation of the small dissident groups speaking out serves a very important function and that is why it should continue. Desmet says it disturbs the mass hypnotic state, it stops the state of mass formation from going too deeply into societies. It is important to keep chipping away against the mainstream narrative, even if it seems impossible. Once the dissidence stops, he says that history shows us repeatedly, the violence starts.

Desmet had a fascinating online discussion on July 7, 2022 with an Irish journalist, Ivor Cummins, who spoke of ‘falling out’ with his friends when he noted recent reports of sudden deaths of healthy people. Early in 2020, Ivor, with a technical, scientific background, got his friends’ attention with his discussion of Covid-19 coming from China. That was fine — but this all changed when the vaccination rollout plan gained tempo in 2021.

Questioning China’s version of the events was one thing — but questioning these individual vaccines became a questioning of all vaccines — and life-threatening, and that was another thing.  It was evidently too disturbing in the newly established state of fear.  Cummins lost many friends, though not all.

Desmet explained to Cummins that societies in a state of fear participate in rituals to assuage their fear — such as mask-wearing (whose use was questioned by Fauci himself) and repeating mantras like ‘we’re all in this together’ (actually the pandemic drove people further apart).

However, Desmet explained to Cummins why he had lost so many friends: ‘You refused to participate in the ultimate ritual… the taking of the vaccine’. Desmet said he too had lost some friends and was ‘excommunicated’ from some groups of academics. But those who really understood what he said now are in touch with him from around the world. He was able to tie together the scientific, statistical and psychological dimensions for those seeking to understand them.

State Control

In her book A State of Fear (2021), Laura Dodsworth also raised the ‘what’ and ‘why’ questions — to what end was the role of the unelected “psychocrats” and this pandemic campaign directed? She concluded that by exacerbating the fear around COVID, governments (or those who advise them) have been building compliance muscle-memory in citizens, perhaps to prepare them for future better compliance.

Of course, Christians have a long history of belonging to the city of God, rather than to the city of man, and have an advantage in ‘seeing through’ things that threaten the practice of their faith. But fear can cut across all groups — religious, academic and professional — and often it is a matter of personalities with traits of curiosity and suspicion that can create a wedge in the mass formation.

Fortunately, both pro-vaccination and anti-vaccination groups are increasingly listening to scientific information often given via alternative media outlets — Rumble, Bitchute and Brighteon. Desmet reiterates that as time goes on, the ‘fear-driven masses’ lose their energy and that we need to help this process ‘before they destroy the people who do not go along with them’.

We should continually ask — why should scientists who question be ignored? Why is there no discussion of evidence-based alternative treatments in the mass media? Why were effective early treatments banned? Why did the vaccinations not work beyond a few months?

While admitting ‘correlation does not mean causation’, why are there sudden unexplained deaths among young healthy athletes, as verified by funeral directors and actuaries? And a whole host of other questions. Each question chips away at the wall of single narrative domination and asserts the human freedom to think.

___

Originally published at Family Life International. Photo by cottonbro.

Thank the Source

Starbucks Announces Cashless Stores

Starbucks Announces Cashless Stores

In a cashless society, all transactions will be at the mercy of Big Tech and governments. Are we ready to give up our privacy and individual freedom for the convenience of swiping a card or phone?

There has been a huge public outcry after Starbucks in the UK announced they would no longer be accepting cash.

Starbucks would be better advised to announce they would no longer be making terrible coffee. But I digress.

Reaction to news of cashless Starbucks stores was so great that the company moved quickly to clarify it was not a store-wide policy.

Individual stores were free to go cashless — and some would — but it was not a company directive, they said.

The backlash was encouraging. People are right to be angry about any move toward banning cash.

Precipitated by the Pandemic

Talk of a cashless society has been around for many years, but it began to pick up pace during Covid when many retailers banned cash for fear that the virus could be transmitted by it.

Covid is not the emergency it once was, but some retailers, having gotten rid of cash, have been slow to get back to how things were.

There is a sense that the public has come to accept that many stores will no longer accept cash, and so it’s a good time to make the transition to digital which has long been talked about.

What Will We Lose?

But to agree to a cashless society is to do a deal with the devil where, in return for a little convenience, you agree to give up privacy and control.

When all money is digital, every transaction is recorded and stored by Big Tech and by the State.

Not only that, but the government have the power to instantly shut down your ability to buy and sell.

This was once the stuff of conspiracy theories. But earlier this year Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau ordered banks to freeze the private accounts of people protesting against his government’s vaccine mandates.

Suddenly the crazy idea that a government could freeze your ability to do business because it didn’t like your politics was no longer the stuff of dystopian fiction. If cash ceases to exist, then your ability to buy and sell is completely at the whim of the State.

Where Is This Headed?

The other big question, of course, is: ‘What’s next?’

If corporations and governments argue that cash is inconvenient so we must move to cards, it is only a matter of time before they argue that cards are inconvenient so we must move to microchips implanted under our skin.

Science fiction? Conspiracy theory?

The World Economic Forum is already pushing the idea of chip implants. An article published recently on their website suggested this very thing.

If the WEF has its way, you and I will be transformed into trackable and hackable devices.

Having grown up in church, I remember hearing how the Bible predicted a one-world system where an individual’s ability to buy and sell was entirely dependent upon them having a particular mark on their forehead, or in their hand.

“It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.” (Revelation 13)

I used to think a one-world system in which it was impossible to purchase anything without a mark on your hand sounded impossible.

Increasingly I believe it to be inevitable.

But, as I said, the backlash to reports that Starbucks was going cashless was encouraging. If not for our own sakes, then for our children’s sake, a cashless society should be delayed for as long as possible.

___

Originally published at The James Macpherson Report.

Subscribe to his Substack here for daily witty commentary.

Thank the Source

One More Week with the Mask

The mask mandate aboard domestic flights is in place for just one more week. Why not scrap it immediately?

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced that passengers on domestic flights will not be required to wear masks as of next Friday.

Yay!

Wait. What?

Why next Friday? Why not ditch the mask mandate immediately?

Well, see, this is where the science comes in.

The PM was able to get Covid to agree not to infect people on aeroplanes from September 9, but negotiations with the virus broke down when it came to this week.

If only Shaquille O’Neal had been on hand to assist. Hadn’t he told the PM on Saturday, “Whatever you need from me, just let me know”?

Well Shaq, we need the mask mandate removed. Not in a week. Now. If you’re not too exhausted from having closed the gap for Indigenous people at the weekend, that is.

I jest of course.

Where is the Logic?

But seriously, Covid can infect people on jets this week, but it won’t be able to infect them on jets next week?

What are the odds?

That’s a rhetorical question, although Shaq could actually help with that one (PointsBet offers great odds. And remember, always gamble responsibly.)

Anyway, the Covid theatre will continue for another week.

People will cram together like sardines as they shuffle through airport security.

People will sit on top of each other at crowded departure gates.

And then people will get on the plane where they will be made to wear a mask, because Covid has been waiting for them on the aircraft.

Airline staff will tell travellers they must keep the mask on for the duration of the flight, removing it only to sip the horrible coffee.

For one more week.

Why one more week?

The science.

What’s the science?

No-one knows. It’s just the science, okay. And the science is settled. Plus, you don’t want to be on the wrong side of mask history, do you?

Follow the Rules

I can’t believe some of you are still questioning this. I bet you’re a right-winger and a conspiracy theorist. But I repeat myself.

Look, love is love, alright. So just go with it. Wear the damn face diaper for one more week.

What exactly will change between now and next Friday, you ask?

Nothing. Nothing will be any different a week from now. You know it, and the politicians know it.

But you’re going to wear the mask for another week anyway. You won’t know why, but you’ll sure as hell know who’s in charge.

And at this stage of the game, I think that’s the entire point.

Covid Karens immediately took to social media to argue that ditching the mask mandate, whether in a week or in 45 years, was irresponsible.

Masks are effective at stopping the spread, they screeched. Which is why, as well as wearing their masks, they have had safe and effective vaccinations. And boosters. And Paxlovid. And boosted boosters.

Covid bedwetters will be relieved to know the government is dropping the mask mandate, not imposing a no mask mandate.

People are still free to wear masks if they want. People can wear seven masks if that’s their thing. And they can cover the holes in their face for the rest of their lives if it makes them feel safer.

As for the rest of us, it’s another seven days. Just so you never forget who’s the boss of you.

___

Originally published at The James Macpherson Report.

Subscribe to his Substack here for daily witty commentary.
Photo by Anna Shvets.

Thank the Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)