HUGE AG Barr Announcement

HUGE AG Barr Announcement

Mainstream media outlets falsely reported his statements, and now AG William Barr is firing back at their lies.

Attorney General Barr’s original statement was taken out of context. “We have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” was miraculously re-written to fit the Democrat narrative, with left-wing mainstream media outlets reporting that the DOJ investigation had concluded and found no evidence of voter fraud.

AG Barr was not happy to be lied about, and had the DOJ issue a statement which read: “Some media outlets have incorrectly reported that the Department has concluded its investigation of election fraud and announced an affirmative finding of no fraud in the election. That is not what the Associated Press reported nor what the Attorney General stated. The Department will continue to receive and vigorously pursue all specific and credible allegations of fraud as expeditiously as possible.”

CBS News’ Catherine Herridge shared the quote on Twitter:

The article by the Associated Press including Barr’s original comments was published on Tuesday. The article read:

“Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

The comments, which drew immediate criticism from Trump attorneys, were especially notable coming from Barr, who has been one of the president’s most ardent allies. Before the election, he had repeatedly raised the notion that mail-in voting could be especially vulnerable to fraud during the coronavirus pandemic as Americans feared going to polls and instead chose to vote by mail.”

AG Barr’s comments were also included in the article. In one of his statements, Barr said: “There’s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results. And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.”

“Most claims of fraud are very particularized to a particular set of circumstances or actors or conduct. … And those have been run down; they are being run down. Some have been broad and potentially cover a few thousand votes. They have been followed up on,” Barr continued.

In their attempts to push the left-wing narrative, the mainstream media ignored phrases such as “so far” and “they are being run down,” which clearly show that the investigation is still ongoing.

Trump Team Response

Rudy Giuliani, one of the Trump campaign’s attorneys, called out AG Barr over his comments, saying, “There hasn’t been any semblance of a Department of Justice investigation. We have gathered ample evidence of illegal voting in at least six states, which they have not examined.”

“We have many witnesses swearing under oath they saw crimes being committed in connection with voter fraud. As far as we know, not a single one has been interviewed by the DOJ. The Justice Department also hasn’t audited any voting machines or used their subpoena powers to determine the truth,” Giuliani continued.

“Again, with the greatest respect to the Attorney General, his opinion appears to be without any knowledge or investigation of the substantial irregularities and evidence of systemic fraud,” the Trump campaign’s legal team added.

Investigations

Soon after the election, AG Barr authorized federal prosecutors to pursue any “substantial allegations” of voting irregularities “if there are clear and apparently-credible allegations of irregularities that, if true, could potentially impact the outcome of a federal election in an individual State.”

If Giuliani is right, and the DOJ isn’t doing their duty in investigating these allegations, Americans should be concerned. Serious allegations of voter fraud or irregularities in the 2020 election should be investigated, to not do so would be to undermine election integrity.

Source

Poll: One In Six Biden Voters Would Have Changed Their Vote If They Had Known About Scandals Suppressed By Media

A new report from the Media Research Center shows that the media’s lack of coverage and big tech’s suppression of certain issues and scandals surrounding Democratic Presidential Nominee Joe Biden could have cost President Donald Trump the election.

The survey results report that 17 percent of Biden voters would not have voted for the Biden-Harris presidential ticket if they had known about at least one of the eight news stories that were suppressed by big tech and mainstream media outlets.

“This is not happenstance. This is not coincidence. This is not oversight and this is not just a mistake,” president and founder of Media Research Center Brent Bozell said at a press conference Tuesday. “These were deliberate decisions that were made thousands of times, literally thousands of times, to either twist or to not cover it at all, which we found in this case.”

The survey, conducted online by The Polling Company with a +/- 2.34 percent margin of error at a 95 percent confidence interval, asked 1,750 Biden voters living in seven swing states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin) if they were aware of certain issues surrounding Biden, his family, and some of the Trump administration’s successes.

Some of these topics include former Biden staffer Tara Reade and her sexual assault allegations against Biden, the Hunter Biden scandal, VP Nominee Kamala Harris’s extreme liberal voting record in the Senate, the U.S.’s economic jump in the third quarter, millions of jobs added, America’s energy independence, Operation Warp Speed successes, and Trump’s facilitation of multiple peace deals in the Middle East.

“The media can talk all day long about Donald Trump and about things that he’s doing wrong. It is absolutely unequivocal, the evidence, that it was the national news media that deliberately, and I underscore deliberately, made it a point, not to tell the public about these stories that nobody can question weren’t important stories,” Bozell said. “We showed that they covered it up, and now we’re showing the evidence that it costs Donald Trump the election.”

Over a quarter of Biden voters said they didn’t know Sen. Harris had the most liberal voting record in the Senate in 2019, and nearly half of all Biden voters polled, 49 percent, said they were unaware of the U.S.’s remarkable economic recovery in the third quarter, doubling the previous record.

One in six Biden voters polled, 17 percent, said they would have changed their vote had they been aware of these stories. The report also found that without even voting for Trump and simply refusing to vote for Biden, “these voters would have handed all six of these states, and a second term, to the president if the news media had properly informed them about the two candidates.”

Each swing state surveyed also produced high numbers of Biden voters who would have defected if they had known the full story.

In Pennsylvania and Georgia, 15 percent of Biden’s voters would have refrained from casting a vote for him. In Michigan, it was 14 percent. In Arizona, it was 21 percent. In Wisconsin, it was 13 percent. And in Nevada, it was 18 percent.

The significant numbers, the report states, “would have moved every one of the swing states into Trump’s column, some by a huge margin.”

“The president would have won the electoral college 311 to 227,” Bozell said.

These results, Bozell said, shows a deliberate effort by big tech and the media to suppress information and must be combated.

“The national news media stole this election,” Bozell concluded. “As far as I’m concerned, they stole it from President Trump by deliberately censoring and keeping from the American people those stories which, had the American people known, would have led to his reelection unquestionably.” 

Source

Kayleigh McEnany Schools the ‘Press’ With the PERFECT History Lesson

Kayleigh McEnany Trump White House Press Secretary CNN News

Some Democrats are calling for unity and healing now that Joe Biden became the “president elect.” But their actions speak louder than their words. White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany set the record straight at her latest press briefing.

Kayleigh McEnany schools reporters

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany is a rock star. Not only is she easy on the eyes, she also has the guts to put these childish reporters in their place.

In her latest White House press conference, McEnany made a closing statement blasting the Democrats and their hypocrisy. “While in 2016 President Trump became the duly elected President, many sought to undermine him, discredit him, delegitimize him and deny his victory. There were no calls for unity. There were no calls for healing.

So while every legal vote is counted, let us not forget the inexcusable transition, or lack thereof that President Trump had to endure in 2016 and four years into his Presidency.”

Once again, she’s absolutely correct. For the past five years the Democrats have been calling Trump and his supporters racists, Nazis, Klan members, Russian agents and conspiracy theorists.

Many prominent Democrats called Trump an illegitimate President and an “occupant of the White House,” saying he only won because Putin helped him. Perhaps they haven’t seen footage of President Trump’s massive MAGA rallies all over the country.

The hypocritical Left

Let’s not forget Hillary Clinton’s recent advice for Joe Biden just a few months before the election. “Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances because I think this is going to drag out, and eventually I do believe he will win if we don’t give an inch and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is.” Trump campaign lawyer Mathew Morgan slammed Clinton’s statements, saying she was “unashamedly trying to lay the groundwork for Joe Biden to deny the election results when President Trump wins.”

The mainstream media has called the election for Biden but it’s not over yet. Trump’s legal team is working overtime preparing to prove their case that massive voter fraud took place across the country.

Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell have assured the American people that we will see all the evidence in the upcoming days. One of two things will happen. Either the Trump team’s evidence of voter fraud will not be good enough to have the election results overturned and Joe Biden will be sworn into office in January.

This would cause massive voter apathy and may lead to America slipping further towards Socialism. Or, the Trump team will present evidence so damning that it will drain the swamp for good. Trump will win his second term and the radical Lefties will burn down American cities. Either way, it’s going to get ugly so get ready patriots.

Source

Joe Biden: Why Are Reporters Asking Me Questions?

Former Vice President Joe Biden isn’t used to getting real questions. On Friday, Biden appeared dumbfounded as to why a reporter was asking the projected Democratic presidential-elect a question as the press pool was being scurried away by staff.

“Mr. Biden, the COVID task force said it’s safe for students to be in class. Are you going to encourage unions to cooperate more to bring kids back to classrooms, sir?” asked CBS reporter Bo Erickson.

“Why are you the only guy that always shouts out questions?” Biden said.

It was a bizarre episode for the 78-year-old Democrat, who enjoyed the least amount of media scrutiny on the campaign trail of any modern candidate running for president. While serious revelations were emerging, revealing Biden’s role in his son’s potentially criminal overseas business dealings, reporters asked hard-hitting questions such as what kind of ice cream Biden purchased at a pit stop.

Erickson was also one of the few reporters to ask Biden about the scandals plaguing his campaign, bombshells suppressed by Big Tech and either ignored or dubiously delegitimized by other mainstream outlets. When pressed on the issue, Biden lashed out at the media.

Erickson’s treatment of the former vice president Friday was the same treatment the media offered to President Donald Trump and his staff throughout the entire last four years, which was on full display again in the White House briefing room on the same day.

Meanwhile, one would be hard-pressed to find California Sen. Kamala Harris, Biden’s running mate, at any point throughout the entire general election campaign taking a single question from a reporter during a press conference.

The media gave a preview of how it would treat a Biden administration on Monday, when Biden began speaking with reporters, who lobbed him softball questions. Joe Concha, a media reporter for The Hill, dubbed the incoming presidential press corps “The new marshmallow media in the Biden era,” in a column published Thursday.

“Any press conference Biden has held since capturing the Democratic nomination has consisted mostly of questions about President Trump and very few questions about Biden’s own worldview, record, policy stances or perspective on important issues such as trade, foreign affairs, gun control, immigration, education, or taxation as it relates to repealing the Trump tax cuts,” Concha wrote. “Of the 12 questions Biden received Monday, there were zero follow-ups. Zero interruptions during answers. Zero questions about any of the issues above, which rank as among the top concerns on voters’ minds, along with the coronavirus.”

Source

Joe Biden Facing Class A Felony Charges…Main Stream Media Blackout

Joe Biden Facing Class A Felony Charges...Main Stream Media Blackout

Democratic presidential nominee and former Vice President Joe Biden was formally indicted on a Class A Felony in Ukraine.

During his term as Obama’s vice president, Joe Biden openly bragged about threatening the Ukrainian president that he would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, which would send Ukraine into insolvency, if he did not immediately fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma Holdings.

Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, was on the board of Burisma, despite having no experience in the energy sector or in Ukraine.

“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden said in a Council of Foreign Relations gathering.

Many conservatives see this as a classic case of Quid Pro Quo – If you want this then give me that. The Gateway Pundit reported: “Biden used this strategy to end the investigation into the company that his son was on the Board of, and forcing the Ukraine to act accordingly in a time of duress.”

Below is video of Biden admitting his felony:

[embedded content]

Earlier this month, NBC News reported that the Ukrainian investigation into Joe Biden had ended, stating: “Ukrainian authorities have closed a criminal probe into Joe Biden, who was accused of improperly forcing the ouster of the country’s prosecutor general in 2016, a police spokesperson said. The investigation was launched in February after the ousted prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, appealed to a court.”

Other than this short report by NBC News, the mainstream media has largely ignored the story, choosing to avoid reporting on anything that could make their preferred candidate look bad.

Conservative news outlet One America News Network reported on this felony charge, and a clip of their report was shared on Twitter:

Source

Fox News Slides Further and Further into Hard Left Territory…Now They Want Trump to Do THIS

Fox news debate trump wallace biden

Fox News was quick to call the election for Joe Biden, despite President Trump and his campaign filing lawsuits demanding recounts in several states.

Now Fox News is saying President Trump should work with the Biden team for a smooth transition of power. It seems Fox is abandoning Conservatives and pushing the Leftist agenda.

Fox and the fake news

Fox News has been sliding further and further Left in the past year. Many viewers have jumped ship, moving on to better options such as NewsMax and One America News Network. President Trump has been lashing out at Fox News as well, calling them fake news and saying they’re no better than CNN.

Fox News anchor Chris Wallace hosted the second presidential debate where he pressed President Trump with tough questions while lobbing softballs at Joe Biden. During the debate, Trump joked that he was debating both Wallace and Biden.

In a recent Fox News segment, host Neil Cavuto cut away from White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany as she was outlining the President’s claims of voter fraud in multiple states.

“Whoa, whoa, whoa, Cavuto interrupted. “I guess we have to be very clear that she’s charging that the other side is welcoming fraud and welcoming illegal voting. Unless she has more details to back that up, I can’t in good countenance continue showing you this. I want to make sure that maybe they do have something to back that up. But that’s an explosive charge to make that the other side is effectively rigging and cheating.”

The election is still undecided

Several states have begun audits and recounts of the votes. Fayette County Georgia just found a memory card with 2,755 uncounted votes. In Dekalb County, an observer filed an affidavit after witnessing an incorrect tally of votes.

The tally had 13 votes for President Trump and 10,000 votes for Biden. The actual tally was 13 Trump votes to 1,000 Biden votes, a 9,000 vote error. Strange how these “errors” always seem to favor the Democrats.

Despite the ongoing investigations into voter fraud, Fox News thinks it’s time to start working with the Biden team. Fox and Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade said, “It’s in the country’s best interest if he starts coordinating on the virus and starts coordinating on security with the Biden team.” Trump has not conceded the race and he’s convinced that he won in a landslide.

Many of his supporters feel the same. The American people deserve a fair and transparent election. President Trump has come too far and fought too hard to just roll over and let the Democrats steal this election. Us Republican voters refuse to let that happen.

Source

Washington Post Predictably Covers For Leftists Who Attacked Trump Supporters Waving Flags In DC

Any time violent leftists ravage a city, we the people are treated to charitable news stories about mostly peaceful protests. Whenever Donald Trump supporters host enthusiastic rallies, the media depict them as deadly superspreader events rife with racist conspiracy theorists.

The Washington Post this week included both in the same article. It lumped a small, antagonistic, left-wing counterprotest into a story that should have been about an exceptionally huge right-wing demonstration of peaceful Trump supporters at our nation’s capital.

The piece, titled “After thousands of Trump supporters rally in D.C., violence erupts when night falls,” was leftist spin from start to finish. As former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer noted, an accurate account of real-life events would have been titled “After Peaceful Pro-Trump Crowds Gather, Left-wing Opponents Use Nightfall to Attack.” But who needs factual headlines? Everyone knows democracy dies in darkness, and accuracy dies at the Washington Post.

The authors of this rally rundown hurled every insult imaginable at the pro-Trump crowd. Even when they were relaying true events — Trump supporters demonstrated peacefully until leftist opponents descended on the capital and clashed with them at night — they took every opportunity to run cover for attacks from the left while demonizing those on the right.

The Washington Post Is a Spin Machine

For instance, why were these peaceful and patriotic Americans gathering in the nation’s capital? According to the Washington Post spin machine, it was “to falsely claim that the election had been stolen from the man they adore.”

Why did the leftist agitators, or, as the Post called them, “the people who oppose their hero,” show up? Not to stir up strife and division, of course. No, leftist demonstrators were simply on-site to communicate truth to those right-wing nuts. According to the authors, the left showed up simply to deliver “a message the president’s most ardent backers were unwilling to hear: The election is over. Trump lost.”

Not only did the Post writers grant equal legitimacy to the two gatherings, although the Trump crowd boasted tens of thousands of demonstrators throughout the day while the left’s agitators numbered about 300, according to the paper’s estimate, they conflated the tenor of two different events. The authors highlighted isolated instances of incivility among the gigantic pro-Trump crowd to downplay the criminal assaults of the leftist counterprotesters in the dark of the night.

“While much of the day unfolded peacefully, brief but intense clashes erupted throughout,” the authors wrote, failing to distinguish from whom exactly these “intense clashes” originated. “Activists spewed profanity and shouted threats, threw punches and launched bottles. On both sides, people were bloodied, and at least 20 were arrested, including four whose allegiances remain unknown on gun charges. The chaos also left two officers injured.” Note that it wasn’t bad actors who hurt law enforcement personnel. It was “chaos’s” fault.

The Washington Post writers were careful to mask the identities of the bad actors in vague language and passive voice. For instance, “a man in his 20s was stabbed in the back.” They describe an “argument that exploded” in the middle of the night between a man holding a Trump flag and a group of agitators. “Suddenly,” the Post says, “police tackled two people in a crosswalk,” whom they failed to identify. Rather than attributing actions to the counterprotesters, the Post went for, “the appearance of counterprotesters sparked bursts of conflict,” implying strife materialized out of thin air when leftists were simply present.

Left Good, Trump Supporters Bad

It wasn’t just about the physical confrontations, however. The Post’s framing of Trump and his supporters, absent any counterprotest, was also egregious. It first failed to communicate the magnitude of the pro-Trump event, opting instead only to bash White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany for “vastly exaggerating the crowd size.”

Then in just two paragraphs, the Post managed to smear the right over four distinct things:

The daytime demonstrations were urged on by Trump, who refuses to concede to Joe Biden or allow a formal transition to begin. On Saturday morning, as the president’s devotees remained in D.C. to fight for him, he headed to Trump National Golf Club in the Virginia suburbs for a round.

After a week in which more than 750,000 Americans were diagnosed with the novel coronavirus, almost none of his backers wore masks. Among their ranks were white nationalists, conspiracy theorists and far-right activists carrying signs demanding action that was already being taken: ‘Count the legal votes.’

First, Trump is an authoritarian who “refuses to concede to Joe Biden” (although litigation is ongoing across the country). Second, Trump cares more about golfing than his job or his supporters (although the media never cared much when Obama or any other president engaged in leisure activities).

Third, Trump-supporters are science-denying grandma-killers (although the media and Democrat COVID-19 hypocrites have lost all credibility related to masks and science). Fourth, Trump supporters are ignorant, deranged, radical racists (a pervasive trope among leftist politicos and media elites). While it’s true that some fringe, alt-right types attended this gathering, they never turn out in numbers even close to Trump’s populist MAGA base — yet the minority of extremists get the majority of the Post’s coverage.

Dropping any facade of objectivity, the Washington Post showed its hand with its blatantly partisan framing. Rest assured then that if the aforementioned violent instigators had been Trumpians, journalists this eager to drag the right would have been delighted to let us know. After all, the Post was happy to include not any photos of left-wing provocateurs, but action shots of MAGA-wearing folks with gritted teeth responding to agitators, or Proud Boys marching in a line.

Americans Aren’t Buying What the Post Is Selling

Meanwhile, the authors described the left-wing counterprotesters as Trump’s “black-clad detractors, many of whom had participated in racial justice rallies throughout the summer.” This is where the media’s utter disconnect from reality and lack of touch with ordinary Americans shines through. For anyone who has paid an ounce of attention since the beginning of the summer, this “racial justice rallies” descriptor for the mob violence, looting, and arson that ravaged our major cities, snuffed out a number of lives, destroyed minority-owned businesses and robbed their livelihoods just doesn’t work.

It’s this major disconnect that makes one line of the Post article ring true: “On stark display in the nation’s capital were two irreconcilable versions of America, each refusing to accept what the other considered to be undeniable fact.”

These “two irreconcilable versions of America” describe the chasm between those who want to “Make America Great Again” and the politicians who call their gatherings “Klan rallies,” between those who want law and order and those who want to defund the police, between the 73 million Americans who voted to keep Trump in the Oval Office and the nearly 79 million who would stop at nothing to get him out. These “two irreconcilable versions of America” describes the insurmountable discrepancy between the America its citizens see with their own eyes versus the one the media tell them is true.

Ironically, this sorry excuse for journalism is one of the reasons the anti-establishment Trump was elected in the first place — and it’s the reason the more than 73 million Americans who voted for him a second term and the tens of thousands who gathered peacefully in the capital aren’t going anywhere any time soon.

Source

Podcast: Getting White Pilled With Michael Malice

On this episode of The Federalist Radio Hour, Federalist Publisher Ben Domenech and Senior Editor Mollie Hemingway sit down with host of the podcast and YouTube show “Your Welcome,” Michael Malice, to discuss the media’s conduct amidst the presidential election.

If taking a “black pill” means you abandon all hope, Malice explains, taking a “white pill” is the belief that the good guys can still win. Malice is the author of “The New Right.”

“The white pill is simply the realization that the claim that people like Joy-Ann Reid and the New York Times and the Harvard Law Faculty, that their victory is inevitable is an absurdity. And as long as there’s a possibility that the good guys will win, that is all you need to sustain you in life,” Malice said. 

“The good guys have won and they don’t want you to remember that the good guys have won,” he added.

The mainstream press adds to this white pill phenomenon by operating as elites with an agenda.

“The corporate press has an agenda, not a bias,” Malice said. “The difference is if you have a bias. you’re gonna look at the data and you’re gonna skew it towards your perception, which I think is a possibility for all of us. An agenda is when you write the story independently the facts.”

Listen here:



Source

Pompeo Tells Reporters ‘There Will Be a Smooth Transition’ to 2nd Trump Term and People Are Shook

Mike Pompeo Trump Election 2020

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told reporters that Trump will be serving a second term and there would be no transition of power to Biden. The Left-wing media is outraged, calling the comments dangerous and conspiratorial. Was he just joking?

Pompeo stands with Trump

One week after election day and it’s not over yet. The Trump campaign has filed multiple lawsuits in key battleground states to investigate allegations of voter fraud. Trump and his supporters remain optimistic that justice will be served.

However, the mainstream media is ready to kick Trump out the door. Politicians and members of the press are calling for Trump to concede and assure the people there will be a peaceful transition of power. But Trump is not ready just yet.

Secretary of Defense Mike Pompeo is standing firm in the President’s corner. When reporters asked if there would be a peaceful transition of power he said, “There will be a smooth transition to a second Trump administration.

We’re ready. The world is watching what’s taking place. The world should have every confidence that the transition necessary to make sure that the State Department is functional today, successful today, and successful with the President who’s in office on January 20th, a minute after noon will also be successful.”

Pompeo was smiling throughout the statement, seemingly aware he was going to ruffle some feathers. As expected, the Left was outraged. Virginia House Rep. candidate Abigail Spanberger said, “This is shocking, shameful, & dangerous.

Our free & fair elections and our commitment to the peaceful transition of power have long been the foundation of our country’s strength and our example in the world, yet @SecPompeo is now seemingly denying the results of our elections.”

Mainstream media want Trump out

Late night talk show host Steven Colbert broke down in tears because of Trump’s refusal to concede. Left-wing lunatic Keith Olberman went further, saying Trump should be removed and arrested, and his voters are morons.

“Trump can still live in a version of the bubble that he and the 69 million morons who voted for him have lived in since 2015,” he said. “Inside Trump World, it’s fun and exciting and there’s no pandemic and nothing but White people and lots of guns and everybody will be a billionaire soon!”

The mainstream media is furious that President Trump wants to investigate the allegations of voter fraud pouring in from all over the country. They claim it’s dangerous and he’s acting like a dictator by not accepting the outcome of the election.

These are the same people who called Trump a puppet of Putin and claimed his election was illegitimate. They investigated him, impeached him, and it still didn’t work. Stealing this election is their next desperate attempt at a power grab.

Source

After Four Years Of Insanity, Can The Media Be Fixed?

On this episode of The Federalist Radio Hour, T. Becket Adams, senior commentary writer at the Washington Examiner, joins Culture Editor Emily Jashinsky to discuss whether the media can bounce back from its anti-Trump roots that have taken hold the last four years, or if its biased and limited coverage is here to stay.

“How do you fix a broken multi-billion dollar industry?” Adams asked, noting that news outlets consistently fail to cover certain viewpoints that many Americans hold.

One way to address this problem, Adams suggests, is ensuring that the people on the ground reporting are heterogeneous in their thinking.

“We say we need the diversity of viewpoints so much and that’s such a cliche or trope at this point but it’s true,” Adams said.You need to need to have some people who have lived a different life or at least understand it.”

The corporate media, however, Adams noted, is not self-aware of their poor standing with the public and doesn’t show signs of improving.

“The way that [President Trump’s] fiercest critics have comported themselves has been despicable and…very, very few people come out of the four years looking good and the press isn’t one of them,” he said. 

Listen here:



Source