Indiana Gov. Wants 29 Times More Funding For Bureaucracy That Brutalized Public Health

Indiana Gov. Wants 29 Times More Funding For Bureaucracy That Brutalized Public Health

Indiana’s term-limited governor, highly unpopular with his GOP base, is pushing an overfunded public health plan that could steal local control from county officials. It’s yet another state-level example of Republican politicians selling out their own voters to bloated and harmful special interests.

The lame-duck governor and several top Republicans in the Republican-controlled legislature are clearly angling to get hired by Big Pharma after leaving public office, thereby using this sweetheart deal to eventually line their own pockets from one of the state’s largest lobbying interests.

Authoritarian orders delivered by Gov. Eric Holcomb and his health commissioner, Kris Box, are one of the reasons Holcomb was booed at his own party convention last June. Those destructive mandates masked kids, hobbled the economy, stunted education, and crushed mental health. Yet Holcomb now wants to increase the influence of this inept state health bureaucracy with an expensive plan designed to centralize more power at the state level. The package will incentivize county health departments to give up local control in return for huge wads of cash.

The governor wants the state legislature to give him 29 times the amount they currently provide for the state’s 95 health departments, from $6.9 million per year to $200 million per year. That financial ask alone tells you why Holcomb is not popular with base voters and won re-election with hundreds of thousands of Democrat votes. It is part of a whopping spending plan that even state Democrats can champion. 

The governor used a crude formula to come up with his budget: figure out how much less Indiana spends on public health than other states and bring it up to the national average. Holcomb claims, without evidence and in the face of long experience showing government intervention makes things worse, that more government spending will reduce obesity, lower smoking rates, and improve mental health — all areas where his state ranks poorly.

Yet it is unlikely that a giant government model will alleviate complex health problems that doctors already aren’t solving with one-on-one care. Furthermore, the fact that public health did so much damage to mental health with its isolating Covid policies gives the field little credibility.

Holcomb has no intention of just handing over this extra money to the counties in some kind of flexible format. The Governor’s Public Health Commission touts a comprehensive plan that must be signed onto in its entirety. It includes 80-20 fund matching rules (where the state pays the bulk); 10 additional statutory duties; new data requirements; and apparently, obedience to state guidance on controversial issues. 

Luke Kenley, one of the commission’s co-chairs, said county commissioners who vote to join the program will be turning over their elected responsibilities to state officials.

“We’ve had these debates, discussions, arguments and fights back and forth about, ‘Well the governor shouldn’t do a mask mandate,’ or ‘The governor is telling us to do this or to do that or something else,’ or ‘What about vaccinations?’ or ‘What about decisions by local officials?’ We’re trying to avoid that kind of a situation by making sure that everybody who’s in the program wants to be in the program,” said Kenley at a committee meeting last summer.

Such remarks make those of us who saw children forcibly masked and quarantined at the direction of the state health department leery of an agreement that could make localities even more answerable to the state on individual health choices. 

All county commissioners will be able to vote on whether they want to tie themselves to the state as part of a five-year plan. While Kenley argues the opt-in plan is voluntary, the sheer financial size of the promised funding comes off as more of a bribe, especially for smaller counties with limited tax bases that already have a hard time meeting state requirements. Even independently-minded commissioners, who might balk at the size and scope of the plan, will be hesitant to turn down the money if it makes it look like they don’t care about constituents’ health. 

Kenley said about 70 percent of health department funding comes from the local tax base, whereas only 30 percent comes from the state. Kenley’s plan aims to make the state the primary funder.

The governor couldn’t have picked a better salesman for the pricey program, as Kenley is Indiana’s former Senate appropriations chair. He mentored Sen. Ryan Mishler, who currently holds the chairman spot and will be a deciding factor in whether Holcomb’s plan gets funding.

The commission itself seems to know that any county proud enough to say no to the state’s program will crawl back eventually because of the amount of money dangled before local governments. That’s also how the federal government now controls states: bribing them to obey ridiculous, harmful, and bankrupting mandates. It’s a bad model that reduces American self-government.

“There will be some who say that, ‘Autonomously we want to be in control, and we will opt out of this.’ What they’re saying is, we will, over the next four years, fund our health according to state law without your help,” said a commission member at one of the group’s final meetings. “In about two years, they’re going to find out: we can’t do that.”

That comment sparked laughter around the tables. He added the state would have to “lovingly support” counties “through their misdirection.” Kenley offered it might be helpful to educate misguided counties so they realize the brutal situation they may face if they decide to opt out.

That tone of condescension, in combination with the fact that the state still does not acknowledge the damage it did with its Covid orders, should give Indiana legislators pause when determining whether to fund Holcomb’s outlandish request. Without the General Assembly backing them up, county commissioners may get stuck saying yes to even more state control.

Amy Drake is a stay-at-home mom, writer, and St. Joseph County councilwoman in South Bend, Ind.


New Zealand’s Prime Minister Is The First Covid Tyrant To Fall, But She Won’t Be The Last

New Zealand’s Prime Minister Is The First Covid Tyrant To Fall, But She Won’t Be The Last

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced her resignation this week after being the nation’s leader for six years. She cited “burnout” as the reason. But many believe Ardern chose to exit early because she expected to face a humiliating defeat in this year’s election. Many Kiwis (a nickname for New Zealanders) are fed up with her government’s harsh Covid-19 restrictions. 

Ardern was only 37 when she was elected as prime minister. She championed leftists’ favorite causes, such as climate change and so-called gender equality. She rose to international fame following the 2019 Christchurch terrorist attack, when a gunman killed 51 people in two mosques. Ardern quickly introduced a strict gun law that banned all “military-style” semi-automatic guns and so-called “assault rifles,” and established a mandatory gun “buyback” program. Arden also wore a hijab to show her respect for the Muslim community. She became a leftist darling and gained fans worldwide. Her images adorned the cover of Time and Vogue. In many ways, she became the AOC of New Zealand. 

It turned out the strict gun law Ardern championed failed to curb gun crimes. On the contrary, gun crimes rose to a 10-year high after the law went into effect, according to Radio New Zealand. But the pandemic was really the defining moment for Ardern and revealed that she is not the compassionate democracy defender she wanted us to believe. 

In early 2020, when New Zealand had only 100 Covid cases, Ardern took the “go hard and go early” approach and imposed some of the world’s strictest lockdowns. Borders were closed in March 2020, and the nation became a giant prison. Families were separated, and no foreigners or overseas New Zealand citizens were allowed to enter the country. New Zealanders had to shelter in place and could only leave their residences to buy groceries or medical supplies.

Ardern believed her approach was necessary to eliminate Covid-19. Like China’s dictator Xi Jinping, she declared her “zero Covid” policy a victory in October 2020 right before her reelection, when the nation reported fewer than 25 Covid-related deaths and fewer than 2,000 cases since March 2020. Ardern won a second term with a landslide victory. She was regarded as a hero, and many pointed to the so-called New Zealand model as a justification for lockdowns. 

Authoritarian Policies

Yet when the nation discovered only one Delta variant Covid case in August 2021, Ardern swiftly re-imposed a nationwide lockdown. This time, however, her “zero Covid” policy failed to stop the spread of the highly infectious variant. The new variant spread nationwide, and the number of cases rose.

Ardern imposed a vaccine mandate to reach a nationwide 90 percent vaccination rate. Customers were required to present vaccine certificates before entering any business establishment, and any business wishing to reopen had to have its staff vaccinated. No one was allowed to get a religious exemption. In a nation of 5 million people, fewer than 100 qualified for a medical exemption. A mask mandate went into effect as well. While pushing for her Orwellian policies, Ardern urged Kiwis to “be kind.”

By then, many Kiwis had had enough. Thousands of protesters showed up in front of New Zealand’s parliament building in early November 2021 with signs saying, “Kiwis are not lab rats” and “freedom.” Protesters demanded Ardern’s government lift its vaccine mandate and roll back other Covid restrictions.

In January 2022, a frustrated New Zealand businessman placed an advertisement in the country’s largest news magazine. According to New Zealand-born journalist Dan Wootton, one headline said, “The following countries do not ban their own citizens from returning to their home country,” and it listed a long list of nations including Afghanistan, China, Australia, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the United States. Under another headline, it said: “The following countries effectively ban their own citizens from returning to their home country,” and it listed just one: New Zealand.

Inspired by the Canadian truckers’ anti-Covid protest, more Kiwis showed up at New Zealand’s parliament building again in February, demanding relief from the government’s compulsory Covid restrictions. Police arrested more than 100 demonstrators. 

Ardern waited until September 2022 to remove the government’s masks and vaccine mandates. That same month, she delivered a speech at the United Nations, calling free speech online a weapon often used by those with evil intent and urging world leaders to combat “misinformation.” Her speech was widely condemned. Independent journalist Glenn Greenwald called Ardern “the face of authoritarianism” on Twitter and said what Ardern revealed in her address was “the mindset of tyrants everywhere.”

Two months later, polls in New Zealand showed that public support for Ardern and the Labor Party she led fell to the lowest level since she became leader in 2017, due to her authoritarian Covid policies, which had taken a heavy toll on the nation’s economy and people’s well-being. There was also an incident last December when Ardern called opposition leader David Seymour an “arrogant p—-” during an exchange in a parliament meeting while unaware her mic was still on. The incident shattered her carefully cultivated public image of being kind and compassionate. Arden saw the writing on the wall that she and her party would face a humiliating defeat in the 2023 election as voters will exercise their Covid-19 reckoning at the ballot box. So she chose to exit on her own terms. 

Post-Pandemic Reckoning

Her resignation announcement last week drew mixed reactions in New Zealand and worldwide. Leftists are sad to see her go, while others cheer for Ardern’s departure. Journalist Wootton tweeted, “Jacinda Ardern has resigned as New Zealand’s prime minister knowing full well she was about to be brutally booted from office by Kiwis who woke up to her Covid authoritarianism, Be Kind hypocrisy and an economic catastrophe she inflicted on an amazing country. Good riddance.” 

After Ardern’s resignation announcement, some wonder if Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will be next to face his compatriots’ post-pandemic reckoning. Like Ardern, Trudeau imposed draconian Covid-19 restrictions in Canada, including mask and vaccine mandates. Trudeau went further by abusing the power of an emergency law to criminalize Canadian truckers who protested against his vaccine mandate, confiscate funds raised by protesters and their supporters, and prohibit future public assemblies. When Trudeau later expressed his support for Chinese protesters who opposed the government’s “zero Covid” policy, many slammed Trudeau as a hypocrite because he too is a tyrant.

Whether Trudeau will resign or be voted out of office remains to be seen. What is clear is that the Orwellian policies that leftist elites such as Ardern and Trudeau championed have been deeply unpopular, and they ruined businesses and lives. These authoritarians want us to forget the suffering we endured in the last three years and move on. But many people demand a Covid reckoning. Ardern is the first Covid tyrant to fall, but she won’t be the last. 


Now That Her Covid Excuses For Tyrannizing New Zealanders Are Gone, PM Jacinda Ardern Resigns In Disgrace

Rather than face voters at the ballot box later this year, New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern — who made an international name for herself as an insufferable tyrant after her disastrous Covid response — announced on Thursday plans to resign by next month.

“Today I’m announcing that I will not be seeking reelection and that my term as prime minister will conclude no later than the seventh of February,” Ardern said. “I know what this job takes, and I know that I no longer have enough in the tank to do it justice. It’s that simple.”

Ardern, who is a member of the left-wing Labour Party, was first elected to the position back in 2017 at the age of 37, making her one of the youngest leaders among developed nations. A “caucus vote for a new party leader and prime minister” is currently slated to take place on Sunday, according to Rebel News.

The announcement comes ahead of New Zealand’s upcoming October elections, for which recent polling has shown the Labour Party trailing its right-wing counterpart by several points. If the election results accurately reflect the polling, it would mean New Zealand’s more conservative parties could form a coalition government.

While long overdue, Ardern’s resignation is a major win for freedom-loving New Zealanders. Since the outbreak of Covid, Ardern, like most Western leaders, has used the virus as justification to crack down on basic civil liberties and medically segregate society.

At the pandemic’s outset in the spring of 2020, Ardern’s government issued a nationwide stay-at-home order for citizens that severely restricted “non-essential travel” and business operations. Within a matter of days, the lockdowns escalated as more Covid cases were reported, leading Ardern to move the country to “Alert Level 4,” the harshest of all lockdown policies where “all New Zealanders were instructed to stay at home and to have physical contact only with those in their ‘bubble.’”

The first week of the shutdowns was later found to be illegal by the country’s High Court.

But Ardern’s overreaching mandates didn’t stop there. Upon the rollout of the Covid shots, the now-outgoing prime minister attempted to blackmail citizens into getting the jabs by threatening to withhold their freedoms if they didn’t comply. In October 2021, the federal government announced that the country would move towards reopening once 90 percent of the population was fully vaccinated, with Ardern telling New Zealanders they wouldn’t be able to live normal lives unless they got the experimental shots.

“If you want summer, if you want to go to bars and restaurants get vaccinated, if you want to get a haircut — get vaccinated,” she said. “If you are not vaccinated there will be everyday things you will miss out on.”

Ardern admitted in an interview with the New Zealand Herald the same week that the purpose of the policy was to create a two-tiered society, where the jabbed are granted certain privileges and the unvaccinated are not.

“So, you’ve basically said, you probably don’t see it like this, but two different classes of people — if you’re vaccinated or unvaccinated. You have all these rights if you are vaccinated,” the outlet asked Ardern, who replied, “That is what it is, yep.”

Shawn Fleetwood is a Staff Writer for The Federalist and a graduate of the University of Mary Washington. He also serves as a state content writer for Convention of States Action and his work has been featured in numerous outlets, including RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and Conservative Review. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood


Zero Trust Access

thecrowhouse – January 13th, 2023
Discord :
TheCrowhouse Banned YouTube Archive on AltCensored:

The Crowhouse Community Forums:

Monthy Subscriptions the TheCrowhouse can now be received via Stripe or direct contributions can be made via Wise bank.
If you would like to assist please visit this page:

Any support is greatly appreciated


Monero: 87myJVoX3H4Pfd3hDp2wujHeB6K7VdFYF2zJJmoqGv8yE55mQDJdg3ySqnmwBXdZLrhJyydykgs2khmckmJNadaeHY3CrYQ
Pirate Chain: zs1f7jvqcntcplpfnva2lw7spwzr0xa5x7wczneg0v2epl78quqnt9ggudrk02yyzp8t4zy7pmflat
Bitcoin Cash:

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

These people think we are stupid for not wanting to be vaxxed. Here is what they are dealing with…

Jim Crenshaw – January 12th, 2023

Well you are quite the trained but not educated smug asshole Mr. Cox are you not? Said “if you are dumb enough to believe the random guy on YouTube (would that be the CEO of Pfizer?) who tells you mRNA vaccines changes your DNA then perhaps that is precisely what you need”… it would appear that as Tiktok influencers, you two have been greatly Covid media and bullshit influenced?

I understand that you and pinky there may be having some problems. Is her hair still pink or has it all fallen out from the chemo? If you are dumb enough to believe that those shit shots they are pumping into you will help you health wise…perhaps that is precisely what you need. After all they have certainly done her some good right?

No tears here. The sooner you die, the less you can help to harm. Get your boosters you vax pushing asshole. You are taking part in a genocide. You are part of why children are being murdered.
Source: bootcamp:

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

Consequences For Children: Data So Far

Consequences For Children: Data So Far

Consequences for Children: Data So Far

By: Justin Hart

COVID-19 pandemic policies and zeitgeist have seriously messed with kids.

Lockdowns and other restrictions brought on by the pandemic have really taken a toll on teenagers, causing disruptions to education and socialization that have led to increased anxiety and worsening mental health. The pandemic has also caused a global increase in child labor, and an estimated 228,000 children in South Asia have died due to supply chain snafus. These realities have further exacerbated existing inequalities and caused developmental delays in babies in these countries.

To combat the pandemic, masks and isolation were implemented in many places, including schools. The Head Start program (which just this week will allow all kids to go maskless) published concerns almost a year ago about the effects of COVID-19 rules on their students. There have also been reports of increased infant abuse and child sex abuse during the pandemic, likely due to stress and isolation. The lockdowns and other restrictions have also caused spikes in diabetes and obesity in children, and the cancellation of sports has had a major impact on kids.

  • Abusive head trauma in infants nearly doubled in the Paris metropolitan area during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, with cases increasing from 1.4 cases per month in 2020 to 2.7 cases per month in 2021 (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 1.92, 95% CI 1.23-2.99, P=0.02)

  • Mortality rates from abusive head trauma in infants jumped nearly 10-fold in 2021 (odds ratio 9.39, 95% CI 1.88-47.00)

  • The median age of infants with abusive head trauma in the study was 4 months, and 65% were male. Of the 99 cases studied, 87% had bridging vein thrombosis, 75% had retinal hemorrhages, 32% had fractures, 26% had status epilepticus, and 20% had skin injuries.

  • 39 billion missed school meals by January 2021.

Millions of estimated life-years lost among students in the USA alone.

Dr. Scott Atlas recently wrote an excellent piece in The New Criterion: “All honest leaders, all individuals with integrity, should acknowledge that people were directly damaged and even died from the censorship of truth.”

Here are just some of the stats that Scott highlights in his piece:

  • A review from 2006 indicated that lockdowns are both ineffective and harmful

  • Lockdowns should not be seriously considered due to their negative effects

  • The closure of in-person schools and the use of experimental drugs in schoolchildren has had negative consequences for children in the US

  • Children have a low risk of serious illness or death from COVID-19

  • Most transmission of COVID-19 to children comes from adults

  • There is no evidence that opened schools pose a significant risk to children, communities, or teachers

  • The median IFR for children under 19 was 0.0003% during the pre-vaccination period (until the end of 2020)

  • No excess deaths among children and adolescents were observed in countries with reliable death registration data during the pandemic

  • The number of fatalities among children under 5 from all causes was 25-50 times higher during lockdowns compared to the five previous years

  • The overall number of child fatalities from all causes was 4-10 times higher during lockdowns compared to the five previous years

  • Lockdowns resulted in a 10-20% increase in new cases of severe child abuse and a 50-80% increase in fatalities from child abuse

  • Lockdowns caused a 30-50% increase in cases of malnutrition and a 50-100% increase in fatalities from malnutrition

  • Lockdowns resulted in a 40-60% increase in new cases of mental illness in children and adolescents and a 100-200% increase in suicides by young people

  • Lockdowns caused a 50-80% decrease in vaccination rates for children, leading to outbreaks of preventable diseases

  • Lockdowns resulted in a 50-80% decrease in diagnosis and treatment of chronic diseases in children, leading to significant morbidity and potential long-term harm

  • Lockdowns had a negative impact on children’s education and development, with long-term consequences for their prospects and well-being.

In the face of pandemic fears, some countries began administering vaccines to children. However, the UK health authorities have long stated that the vaccine has underperformed in children, and the country has started making damage payments as a result. Germany, on the other hand, is not advising the vaccine for most children at all.

Some of the bravest authors came together to look at vaccines. Their study assessed the risk and benefit of COVID-19 vaccine booster mandates for young adults aged 18-29 at universities. The researchers found that to prevent one COVID-19 hospitalization in a 6-month period, it would be necessary for 31,207 to 42,836 young adults to receive a third mRNA vaccine. The study also found that booster mandates for young adults are expected to result in a net harm, with at least 18.5 serious adverse events anticipated for each COVID-19 hospitalization prevented.

These serious adverse events may include booster-associated myopericarditis in males, which typically requires hospitalization, and grade ≥3 reactogenicity interfering with daily activities. The researchers concluded that booster mandates for young adults at universities are unethical because they do not consider updated risk-benefit assessments for this age group, may result in a net harm to healthy young adults, are not proportionate to the anticipated benefits, violate the reciprocity principle, and may have wider negative societal impacts.

One in 500 kids under the age of five were hospitalized after receiving the vaccine. To prevent one COVID-19 hospitalization over a 6-month period, it is estimated that 31,207-42,836 young adults aged 18-29 years must receive a third mRNA vaccine.

  • There will be at least 18.5 serious adverse events from mRNA vaccines per COVID-19 hospitalization prevented, including 1.5-4.6 booster-associated myopericarditis cases in males (requiring hospitalization).

  • There will be 1430-4626 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity (interference with daily activities, but not requiring hospitalization) per COVID-19 hospitalization prevented.

  • The prevalence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection is high.

  • Current vaccines do not significantly reduce transmission.

  • The age at peak risk for myopericarditis is 16-17 years.

Next, the mental health issues are legion:

  • 44.2% of high school students in a nationwide survey of 7,705 students described persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness that prevented them from participating in normal activities.

  • 9% of students in the same survey reported attempting suicide.

  • 55.1% of teenage respondents in the same survey said they suffered emotional abuse from a parent or another adult in their house in the preceding year.

  • 11.3% of teenage respondents in the same survey said they suffered physical abuse.

There are many people who need to be held accountable.

Here are some relevant studies and reports to get more info (via our friend The Robber Baron!):


The above article (Consequences for Children: Data So Far) was originally created and published by the BROWNSTONE INSTITUTE and is republished here with permission and attribution to author Justin Hart and

About the Author: Justin Hart is an executive consultant with over 25 years experience creating data-driven solutions for Fortune 500 companies and Presidential campaigns alike. Mr. Hart is the Chief Data Analyst and founder of which helps companies, public policy officials, and even parents gauge the impact of COVID-19 across the country. The team at offers alternative solutions on how to move forward during this challenging pandemic. This article originated on the author’s Substack.

Image Credit: Photo in Featured Image (top) – Pixabay License



The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


The Tyrannical Covid Regime Is Quietly Reviving The ‘Forever Pandemic’

The Tyrannical Covid Regime Is Quietly Reviving The ‘Forever Pandemic’

Nearly three years after bureaucrats shuttered businesses, forced people to stay home, and threatened fines for those who didn’t comply, all in the name of preventing the spread of a respiratory virus, the Covid regime is quietly reviving the “forever pandemic.”

Ahead of the midterms, the Biden administration, Democrats, and corporate media championed the end of years of pandemic panic.

“The pandemic is over,” President Joe Biden declared during a “60 Minutes” interview in September.

The Covid regime’s grip on the country may have loosened during the heat of the 2022 election cycle, which gave Americans the false hope that everything was finally returning to normal. Shortly after the election, however, when Democrats realized the Republican Party isn’t as big of a threat as expected, fearmongering about a “surge” in the nearly three-year-old pandemic thanks to a new variant resumed.

“Should Everyone Be Masking Again?” one Atlantic writer inquired in December. His article is littered with comments from “experts” who eagerly and unanimously answered “yes.”

“You really should mask up again, says infectious disease expert: The tripledemic is hitting ‘too fast and too furious,’” one CNBC headline blared a few days before Christmas.

“The ‘Tripledemic’ Holiday: How to Fly More Safely (Hint: Wear a Mask),” The New York Times wrote.

When corporate media mouthpieces aren’t virtue signaling about staying home on New Year’s Eve, alleging that emergency rooms are “packed and doctors are rationing care,” they are offering favorable coverage of communist China’s forced lockdowns and wondering aloud why certain counties aren’t heeding the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s recommendations to mask communities with “high” levels of virus transmission.

Despite the legitimate scrutiny the CDC has received for its bureaucratic malfeasance, its Director Rochelle Walensky all but confirmed the agency’s commitment to reintroducing protocols that, according to the science, don’t stop infection from spreading.

“We wanted you to put your masks away, not to throw your masks out,” Walensky said in an interview with NPR in early December.

Public schools all around the nation, similarly, are backsliding. Evidence indicates that forced masking takes a toll on children’s ability to learn and speak. That hasn’t stopped some of the largest school districts in Philadelphia, New Jersey, and Boston from reintroducing forced masking for the beginning of the spring semester.

“We don’t think that learning will stop or that students will be inherently prohibited from learning,” Philadelphia School District Superintendent Tony Watlington Sr. told NBC.

Some cities such as Oakland have decided to reinstate mask mandates for government buildings. Others are contemplating a return to masks at the behest of so-called “infectious disease experts.”

Bureaucrats justify these useless and harmful mandates under the claim that the rise of RSV, the flu, and Covid cases could, combined, overwhelm local hospitals. Sound familiar? That’s the same excuse bureaucrats used to extend “two weeks to flatten the curve” to keep the U.S. locked down for most of 2020.

Mask mandates aren’t the only indicator that the Covid regime is trying to claw its way back into the driver’s seat. Biden, who smeared former President Donald Trump as xenophobic for introducing a similar policy in 2020, quietly enacted testing restrictions on travelers from Covid-plagued China last week.

Furthermore, Anthony Fauci, the now-retired former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases who was mostly absent from TV screens for months leading up to the midterms, was back on corporate media shows shortly after Election Day telling Americans what to do with their lives.

Fauci’s first order of business was to warn Americans that the United States is “‘certainly’ still in the middle of a Covid-19 pandemic.” By the new year, he had parroted lies about Covid deaths in red states versus blue states, showed no remorse nor regret for encouraging deadly lockdowns, and doubled down on his concerns that “disinformation” and “misinformation” could reign without interference from Big Tech.

Republicans have threatened to hold Fauci and other “forever pandemic” spokesmen accountable for the havoc they wreaked on the economy and Americans’ health and education. But while the GOP, which only holds a razor-thin majority in the House, is distracted by infighting, the Covid regime is emboldened to further encroach on Americans’ lives once more.

Jordan Boyd is a staff writer at The Federalist and co-producer of The Federalist Radio Hour. Her work has also been featured in The Daily Wire and Fox News. Jordan graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow her on Twitter @jordanboydtx.


Kerryn Phelps Injured By Vax: Claims Doctors Censored

XYZ | By David Hiscox – December 21, 2022

What a crazy, extreme right conspiracy theorist. She’s probably the kind of person who will ambush innocent police officers and murder them in cold blood for no reason whatsoever.

Beware the dark rabbit hole of Telegram, people.

From nEwS.cOm:

Former federal MP Dr Kerryn Phelps has revealed she and her wife both suffered serious and ongoing injures from Covid vaccines, while suggesting the true rate of adverse events is far higher than acknowledged due to underreporting and “threats” from medical regulators.

XYZ News has been making this point for nearly two years.

In an explosive submission to Parliament’s Long Covid inquiry, the former Australian Medical Association (AMA) president has broken her silence about the “devastating” experience — emerging as the most prominent public health figure in the country to speak up about the taboo subject.

“This is an issue that I have witnessed first-hand with my wife who suffered a severe neurological reaction to her first Pfizer vaccine within minutes, including burning face and gums, paraesethesiae, and numb hands and feet, while under observation by myself, another doctor and a registered nurse at the time of immunisation,” the 65-year-old said.

“I continue to observe the devastating effects a year-and-a-half later with the addition of fatigue and additional neurological symptoms including nerve pains, altered sense of smell, visual disturbance and musculoskeletal inflammation. The diagnosis and causation has been confirmed by several specialists who have told me that they have seen ‘a lot’ of patients in a similar situation.”

“We did a lot of homework before having the vaccine, particularly about choice of vaccine at the time. In asking about adverse side effects, we were told that ‘the worst thing that could happen would be anaphylaxis’ and that severe reactions such as myocarditis and pericarditis were ‘rare’.”

Dr Phelps revealed she was also diagnosed with a vaccine injury from her second dose of Pfizer in July 2021, “with the diagnosis and causation confirmed by specialist colleagues”.

“I have had CT pulmonary angiogram, ECG, blood tests, cardiac echogram, transthoracic cardiac stress echo, Holter monitor, blood pressure monitoring and autonomic testing,” she said.

“In my case the injury resulted in dysautonomia with intermittent fevers and cardiovascular implications including breathlessness, inappropriate sinus tachycardia and blood pressure fluctuations.”

Dr Phelps said both reactions were reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) “but never followed up”.

Note that tens of thousands of doctors and nurses in Australia and hundreds of thousands worldwide refused the poison jab and were barred from working as a result. We were told at the time we should “trust the experts”. Yet medical professional professionals, by definition literal experts, who refused the jab were not only ignored, they were censored.

Read More

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation


Please help truthPeep spread the word :)