No More Excuses: Republicans Must Appoint An FTC Commissioner Who Will Rein In Big Tech

No More Excuses: Republicans Must Appoint An FTC Commissioner Who Will Rein In Big Tech

It was reported this week that Noah Phillips, a Republican commissioner at the Federal Trade Commission, will step down in the fall. While Biden will presumably nominate his successor, tradition suggests he’ll defer to Senate Republicans — read: Mitch McConnell — for the pick. This gives the GOP an opportunity to turn the page on more than a decade of Big Tech appeasement by Republican FTC commissioners like Phillips and his predecessors.

The FTC’s historical record on Big Tech is abysmal, having rubber-stamped the anti-competitive acquisitions and predatory conduct that enabled tech platforms to become the monopolistic behemoths they are today. And conservatives increasingly believe, rightly, that their gripes with Big Tech, from censoring speech to bootlicking the Chinese Communist Party, are downstream of the companies’ market power — the absence of real competition enables bad behavior.

That’s why conservative organizations like my employer, American Principles Project, have worked with anti-monopolists from all across the political spectrum to back antitrust legislation that will empower the FTC and other bodies to check the power of these companies.

Last year, Republicans signaled their desire for change at the FTC when 21 senators crossed the aisle to vote to confirm Lina Khan as commissioner; she was then appointed to chair the agency by Biden. This rare display of bipartisanship was for one reason: Khan pledged to rein in Big Tech.

The FTC’s enforcement record when it comes to Big Tech has been awful for more than a decade. Between 2010 and 2019, Big Tech companies completed more than 600 transactions involving smaller companies, including anti-competitive takeovers of Instagram and WhatsApp. Particularly under the Obama administration, these takeovers were rubber-stamped by the FTC as a matter of course. In 2013, the FTC even closed an investigation into Google’s monopolistic power — a problem which was apparent then but has only become worse in the intervening years.

The Trump administration made some strides in antitrust enforcement, but the FTC’s record still leaves much to be desired. Consistent with Obama’s FTC’s failed policy framework, Trump’s FTC failed to block a single tech merger. Just a few weeks ago, Republican commissioners continued to vote against the first major Big Tech challenge. And now, reports are that the FTC is about to greenlight yet another tech merger, with Microsoft, the world’s second-largest company, seeking to acquire Activision, one of the largest video game companies.

On the last point, this is exactly the kind of merger where you’d expect to see bipartisan opposition. From the left’s perspective, this should be right up their alley as the supposed opponents of concentrated corporate power. As an added bonus, both companies have all sorts of woke fatwas out on them — the funniest being after Activision failed to grant enough a suitable amount of work-from-home days in response to employee demand after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision. But apart from a sternly worded letter from four leftist senators, the outcry about the deal has been fairly muted.

From the right, you’d expect to see groups sounding the alarm about the growing dominance of Microsoft, a company whose track record on China is questionable at best — from blocking words like “Taiwan independence” to deplatforming a dissident Chinese journalist to censoring Bing search results for “Tank Man” on the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. (The company claims the last example of censorship only took place due to “human error.” Color me skeptical.)

Given the company’s track record of appeasing China for monetary gain, conservatives should be worried about Microsoft achieving market dominance in gaming, a critical and growing industry in both the U.S. and China. Will video games be the next vector for Chinese censorship, or will they remain an avenue for free expression and American values?

But by and large, these concerns don’t come up, at least not publicly. Big Tech companies have spent hundreds of millions of dollars buying out the organizations that work in this space. For example, at least one prominent left-leaning organization, Access Now, which has been outspoken in support of antitrust legislation (bills that notably largely spare Microsoft from any impact), has said nothing about the deal. Perhaps not coincidentally, the organization has received over a million dollars in donations from Microsoft over the years.

Are other groups who would normally oppose the deal similarly situated? It’s tough to know for sure. Unlike its Big Tech rivals Facebook and Google, Microsoft is not very transparent on this question.

These Big Tech companies know that their power is safe so long as they control the five-member board of the FTC. The sad truth is that they’ve had this control for most of the past few decades. If Republicans take power again, and especially if they win the presidency, they will have the opportunity to reshape the FTC by appointing people who are actually interested in enforcing the law rather than just granting Big Tech’s every request. But even now, the GOP has an exciting opportunity with choosing Phillips’ successor. Mitch McConnell needs to get this one right.


Jon Schweppe is the director of policy and government affairs at American Principles Project. Follow him on Twitter @JonSchweppe.

The Federalist logo eagle mark

Unlock commenting by joining the Federalist Community.

Subscribe

Source

Bokhari: Big Tech’s Blueprint to Stop a Red Wave in 2022

Bokhari: Big Tech’s Blueprint to Stop a Red Wave in 2022

Republicans think a “red wave” is inevitable in November. But the Democrats still have one big advantage: the ever-tightening grip of Big Tech censorship, which will be used to prevent undecided voters from encountering even the most mainstream conservative news in the runup to the next election. Republicans will have a strong message — but what if voters are prevented from hearing it?

In the runup to the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Google completely suppressed Breitbart News from its search results. Compared to 2016, Breibart News went into the 2020 election with a 99.7 percent reduction in visibility for its links on Google search. The censorship was so severe, no-name blogs with plagiarized headlines and content would appear in search results before the original Breitbart News articles. On searches for the term “Joe Biden,” Google cut visibility on Breitbart News links to zero.

Then, a few weeks before the election, Big Tech teamed up to suppress one of the biggest stories of the cycle: the Hunter Biden laptop story. A post-election poll found that 17 percent of Biden voters would have reconsidered their decision had they been aware of the laptop story alone, not counting the hundreds of Breitbart News stories voters didn’t have access to due to Google censorship.

Biden’s margin of victory in three swing states was less than a percentage point, making tech censorship a pivotal factor in the outcome. There is no law preventing Silicon Valley from not only repeating this plan in 2022, but scaling it up to a massive level – and that’s exactly what they are doing. The groundwork is already being prepared, in a number of ways:

#1 “Independent” Watchdogs Downgrading Conservative Media — NewsGuard Discredits The Right 

No matter how mainstream you are, you aren’t safe. NewsGuard, the establishment “misinformation” watchdog that received funding from the Pentagon and whose software is being rolled out by millions of schoolteachers across the country, recently downgraded Fox News in its rankings of trustworthy and untrustworthy news sources.

NewsGuard users will now see a red warning label next to Fox News links all around the internet, signaling to users that the source is considered untrustworthy by the organization, which was set up by former establishment media figures Steven Brill and L. Gordon Crovitz in 2018, in the early years of the media-concocted “misinformation” panic.

Fox News and Breitbart News have now both received the negative “red” rating from NewsGuard. This means that, going into the 2022 midterm elections, NewsGuard is warning its users not to read the two leading conservative-leaning sources of online news.

Naturally, the sources that pushed the Russiagate hoax and said the Hunter Biden laptop was “Russian disinfo” — a claim repeated by NewsGuard’s co-founder — receive no such warning label.

#2 Facebook Suppressing The News — If The Wrong Side Is Winning, Call Off The Game 

Silicon Valley has also found a way to censor all conservative media at the same time. For years, the left has been wailing and screaming about the success of conservative media on Facebook. Despite algorithm changes that suppressed traffic to conservative websites — by a whopping 20 percent in the case of Breitbart News — conservative media has continued to crush the competition.

Facebook has an answer: if conservative media is winning the news war on its platform, it will simply suppress all news at the same time. This month, the Wall Street Journal reported that the platform is shifting resources away from its News Tab and news distribution, and towards a “creator economy.” This means that news will be featured less frequently to users, whether they ask for it or not. This is a way of preventing unwanted narratives from reaching the public, at the very moment when news coverage of the failures of Democrat rule in D.C. will be ramping up.

This is a repeat of what Facebook did after the 2016 election when it reduced the visibility of political posts — a change that resulted in engagement on Donald Trump’s page dropping by almost half.

#3 Taxpayer-Funded Censorship — NPR Creates Misinformation Bureau 

Meanwhile, in the media, the steady drumbeat of the “misinformation” panic continues. Taxpayer-funded NPR is running a whole series about the media-concocted crisis, with a near-exclusive focus on stories that spread in conservative circles. “Misinformation” and “disinformation,” like “fake news,” wasn’t a buzzword before Trump won, but now it is everywhere: it is pushed by think tanks, it is pushed by government-funded agencies, it is debated by congressional committees, it suddenly becomes a new responsibility of the federal government. This is how elites manufacture a crisis — every institution they control saturates the information environment to create a sense of panic.

You can determine the purpose of such a panic from its targets. Ask almost any prominent conservative or even journalists not in alignment with the far left if they’ve received a warning on social media for spreading “misinformation,” and they will likely say yes. The victims include journalists like Alex Berenson, Senators like Rand Paul, and of course the former President. Leftist misinformation, whether it concerns “Russiagate,” biological gender differences, or police and crime statistics, is, naturally, never called out.

#4 Regulatory Gridlock — No Recourse For Citizens 

The goal of the misinformation panic has always been to delegitimize conservative viewpoints and give Big Tech a pretext to censor them. So long as the Supreme Court continues to block efforts to address corporate censorship, this trend will only worsen. As things stand, tiny local radio and TV stations are subject to more stringent political neutrality requirements than Google, Facebook, or Twitter.

Previous regulators, perhaps overzealously, sought to prevent even the smallest communication platforms from unduly influencing an election, but today’s Supreme Court seems fine with the most powerful platforms that have ever existed doing so. Carefully considered news tech laws aimed at giving users some measure of due process against the tech giants, most notably the one passed in Texas, have yet to make it past the Supreme Court.

#5 The Institutionalization of Censorship — Facebook’s $150 Million ‘Oversight Board’ 

With the actual courts of the U.S. having their hands tied, Big Tech is funding a parallel justice system to take its place. Facebook recently announced $150 million in new funding for its “Oversight Board,” the private body where users can go to beg for their censored accounts back. Naturally, this “Facebook supreme court” is a farce — filled to the brim with leftists and globalists, it failed to overturn the most egregious act of political censorship ever conducted by Silicon Valley, the blacklisting of Donald Trump.

Like the “misinformation” panic, the point of the Oversight Board is to give a veneer of process and legitimacy to Facebook’s suppression of non-progressive viewpoints.

Going into the 2022 midterm elections, if Silicon Valley gets its way, voters online will see only what the elites want them to see. That January 6 was the worst attack on democracy ever. That Republicans killed people by pointing out masks don’t work. That women in red states are being driven to coathanger abortions.

In short, Silicon Valley will ensure that the misinformation of the establishment gets a megaphone, while any conservative counterpoints are silenced. We already know from 2020 that this works. The question is, what are Republicans going to do about it?

Allum Bokhari is the senior technology correspondent at Breitbart News. He is the author of #DELETED: Big Tech’s Battle to Erase the Trump Movement and Steal The Election.

Source

Former Google ‘Disinformation’ Expert Given Top White House Cyber Role

Former Google ‘Disinformation’ Expert Given Top White House Cyber Role


Former Google ‘Disinformation’ Expert Given Top White House Cyber Role

Disinfo Board Redux

BREITBART

The White House’s Office of the National Cyber Director has a new Deputy National Cyber Director: Camille Stewart Gloster, a former Google executive who specialized in removing “disinformation” from the tech giant’s app store, and in her spare time rants about “systemic racism” in America.

Camille Stewart Gloster, Google exec now working for Joe Biden's White HouseCamille Stewart Gloster

In a tweet, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) accused the Biden administration of appointing a leftist “social justice warrior” to run the cyber office.

“The Big Tech, Big Government alliance continues,” said Sen. Hawley.

Gloster is a prime example of the extensively documented revolving door between Google and Democrat administrations. Prior to working for the tech giant, she was Senior Policy Advisor for Cyber, Infrastructure & Resilience Policy at the Department of Homeland Security under President Obama.

At Google, she was Head of Security Policy for Google Play and Android at Google, where she led “security, privacy, election integrity, and dis/mis-information.”

“Disinformation” and “misinformation” are terms used by tech and media elites as a pretext to suppress information they dislike. One such example is the Hunter Biden laptop story, which was baselessly condemned at the time of its publication as potential “Russian disinformation.”

Former security officials, Gloster’s professional peers, played a key role in giving legitimacy to the Russian scapegoat narrative.

Continue at BREITBART


Header featured image (edited) credit: Gloster/Twitter grab

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

Disinfo Board Redux: Former Google ‘Disinformation’ Expert Given Top White House Cyber Role

Disinfo Board Redux: Former Google ‘Disinformation’ Expert Given Top White House Cyber Role

The White House’s Office of the National Cyber Director has a new Deputy National Cyber Director: Camille Stewart Gloster, a former Google executive who specialized in removing “disinformation” from the tech giant’s app store, and in her spare time rants about “systemic racism” in America.

In a tweet, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) accused the Biden administration of appointing a leftist “social justice warrior” to run the cyber office.

“The Big Tech, Big Government alliance continues,” said Sen. Hawley.

Gloster is a prime example of the extensively documented revolving door between Google and Democrat administrations. Prior to working for the tech giant, she was Senior Policy Advisor for Cyber, Infrastructure & Resilience Policy at the Department of Homeland Security under President Obama.

US President Joe Biden looks on as he attends the first day of the G7 leaders' summit held at Elmau Castle, southern Germany on June 26, 2022. (Photo by LUKAS BARTH / POOL / AFP) (Photo by LUKAS BARTH/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

(Photo by LUKAS BARTH/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Nina Jankowicz, executive director of the Disinformation Governance Board (U.S. Department of Homeland Security)

At Google, she was Head of Security Policy for Google Play and Android at Google, where she led “security, privacy, election integrity, and dis/mis-information.”

“Disinformation” and “misinformation” are terms used by tech and media elites as a pretext to suppress information they dislike. One such example is the Hunter Biden laptop story, which was baselessly condemned at the time of its publication as potential “Russian disinformation.”

Former security officials, Gloster’s professional peers, played a key role in giving legitimacy to the Russian scapegoat narrative.

In her tweets, Gloster has demonstrated her ability to tie far-left causes like “systemic racism” to the seemingly unrelated topic of cybersecurity.

“Systemic racism is a cybersecurity threat,” wrote Gloster in 2020, quoting an article from the Council on Foreign Relations.

“Cybersecurity is about people & ignoring how technology shows up in the lives of ALL people leaves us vulnerable,” said Gloster in a later tweet.

In 2020, following the shooting of Jacob Blake in Kenosha Wisconsin, Gloster said America’s “#NatSec apparatus must be a part of dismantling systemic racism” (Blake, holding a knife at the time, had been physically fighting police before being shot).

The Office Of The National Cyber Director was established in 2021 with the goal of strengthening U.S. cybersecurity policy. Its first hires were from Microsoft and the CIA.

The hiring of a “misinformation” expert to fill this role falls in line with the Biden Administration’s trend of using the national security state for domestic political goals, the most prominent example being the Department of Homeland Security’s “disinformation governance board.” Gloster has already stated that the partisan notion of “systemic racism” should be a concern of the U.S. national security apparatus.

Allum Bokhari is the senior technology correspondent at Breitbart News. He is the author of #DELETED: Big Tech’s Battle to Erase the Trump Movement and Steal The Election.

Source

Keep It in Your Cyberpants: Elon Musk Accused of Breaking Up Google Co-Founder’s Marriage

Keep It in Your Cyberpants: Elon Musk Accused of Breaking Up Google Co-Founder’s Marriage

A recent report claims that Tesla CEO Elon Musk engaged in an affair last fall with the wife of Google co-founder Sergey Brin, prompting Brin to file for divorce and ending the friendship between the tech billionaires. Musk has denied the report, calling it “total bs” in a tweet.

The Wall Street Journal reports that Tesla CEO Elon Musk engaged in an affair with the wife of Google co-founder Sergey Brin last fall. The move resulted in Brin filing for divorce and ended the long friendship between Brin and Musk, according to sources.

Sergey Brin, co-founder of Google Inc., wears Project Glass internet glasses while speaking at the Google I/O conference in San Francisco, California, U.S., on Wednesday, June 27, 2012. Google Inc. unveiled a $199 handheld computer called the Nexus 7 that features a 7-inch screen and is designed to help the company vie with Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Amazon.com Inc. in the surging market for tablets. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Sergey Brin, co-founder of Google Inc. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Elon Musk celebrates Texas

Elon Musk celebrates Texas (SUZANNE CORDEIRO/AFP/Getty)

Musk and Brin have had a long friendship, with Musk even stating that he regularly stayed at Brin’s house during their early days in Silicon Valley. Brin once even lent Musk $500,000 to keep Tesla afloat during the 2008 financial crisis when the company was struggling to increase production.

Tensions between Musk and Brin and their teams have been growing in recent months according to sources, with Brin ordering financial advisers to sell his personal investments in Musk’s companies. Brin filed for divorce from Nicole Shanahan in January this year, citing “irreconcilable differences,” according to records filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court. The filing was made weeks after Brin allegedly learned of the affair.

Shortly after the publication of the WSJ’article, Musk tweeted: “This is total bs. Sergey and I are friends and were at a party together last night!” Musk added that he had only seen Shanahan twice in three years with other people present and it wasn’t romantic.

In an interview with the news website Puck, Shanahan commented on the divorce filing stating: “I hope for Sergey and I to move forward with dignity, honesty and harmony for the sake of our child. And we are both working towards that.”

Read more at the Wall Street Journal here.

Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan

Source

Bombshell Claim: Google Intercepted 100% of RNC Donation Emails on Biggest Donation Days of Month – for 7 Months Straight

Bombshell Claim: Google Intercepted 100% of RNC Donation Emails on Biggest Donation Days of Month – for 7 Months Straight

  June 30, 2022

Google's Gmail censorship cost GOP candidates $2B since 2019, Republicans say, citing new study | Fox News

Big Tech’s bias against conservatives is well known.

And yet Google is taking its double standards and discrimination to a new level.

The Republican National Committee revealed that its email communications are being tactically labeled as “spam” by the Silicon Valley company, according to Axios.

The “spam” label allows Google to filter the emails away from the sight of Gmail users, hidden in a spam inbox.

Google sent RNC emails to the spam inbox with regularity on important fundraising deadlines, according to RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel.

On some days, as many as 90 percent to 100 percent of RNC emails hit the main inbox.

On other critical fundraising dates, the emails are all but assured to be hidden away as spam, reaching as few as 0 percent of Gmail inboxes.

Google has blacklisted and purged information that’s inconvenient to the left from search results for years.

This form of censorship is even more nefarious. It blocked communications between willing parties.

Individuals who are signed up to receive RNC emails can unsubscribe at any time.

Critics of Big Tech’s censorship and bias have proposed regulating the Silicon Valley giants as common carriers.

This would make it illegal for Google to discriminate politically. They’d be obligated to treat every user of their service equally.

McDaniel revealed that the RNC has filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission against Google’s political bias.

Source

‘Pro-Choice’ Democrats Demand Google Block Search Results For Crisis Pregnancy Centers

As pregnancy centers, pro-life organizations, and churches all around the nation are under siege from pro-abortion criminal groups which are outraged that the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to overturn Roe v. Wade, 21 congressional Democrats are demanding Google’s parent company Alphabet ban search engine results for crisis pregnancy centers so women will feel they have no options but to seek services from facilities that promote murdering preborn babies.

In a letter addressed to Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai on June 17, Democrats such as Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar, Richard Blumenthal, Dianne Feinstein, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Bernie Sanders smeared life-affirming pregnancy centers, many of which offer free or discounted pregnancy tests, ultrasounds, and other care to women in need, as “fake clinics” that don’t deserve a spot in Google’s top results.

The Democrats parroted data from the foreign dark-money group The Center for Countering Digital Hate which recently claimed that 11 percent of search engine results for queries such as “abortion near me” and “abortion pill” in at least 13 states where abortion will be effectively banned if the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade redirected users to pregnancy centers. The same CCDH report allegedly found that 37 percent of Google Maps searches also ended at pro-life care clinics.

In the letter, Democrat signatories argue that these kinds of search engine results are “misleading” and could direct women to organizations that encourage and help them keep their babies alive.

“Directing women towards fake clinics that traffic in misinformation and don’t provide comprehensive health services is dangerous to women’s health and undermines the integrity of Google’s search results,” the letter states.

As noted by the senators and representatives, Google has already committed to banning and throttling pro-life advertisements on its pages by issuing its own “fact checks” of the sponsored content. The Democrats not only complained that these existing “disclaimers” slapped on top of the paid content are “easily missed” and have font that is too small, but also urged the Big Tech company to adopt similar censorship practices for non-sponsored pro-life content that may appear through its search engine.

The Democrats’ public push to stifle crisis pregnancy centers, even in states where abortion is or will be effectively banned, is just one of many of the abortion regime’s recent endeavors to reject the imminent SCOTUS Dobbs v. Jackson ruling which could very likely give decisions about abortion back to the states. The corrupt corporate media is also focused on promoting abortion propaganda.

The TODAY Show published a Father’s Day-themed article celebrating how “abortion shaped [fathers’] lives.”

“Eight dads are sharing how abortion has helped them become the fathers they are today, on what experts believe will likely be the last Father’s Day before the Supreme Court issues a ruling that would overturn Roe v Wade,” the article’s opening sentence reads.

An author for The Intercept recently shared how she sympathizes with the left-wing, anarchist-connected group Jane’s Revenge, which has taken credit for several firebombings and crimes against pregnancy centers, churches, and other pro-life facilities across the nation and threatened a violent “open season” against pro-lifers.

“Their rhetoric speaks to me,” she wrote.


Jordan Boyd is a staff writer at The Federalist and co-producer of The Federalist Radio Hour. Her work has also been featured in The Daily Wire and Fox News. Jordan graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow her on Twitter @jordanboydtx.

Source

Attorney Generals Demand Biden Admin Stop Colluding With Big Tech To Censor Speech

Attorney Generals Demand Biden Admin Stop Colluding With Big Tech To Censor Speech

Attorneys general in Missouri and Louisiana filed a motion for preliminary injunction this week demanding a court stop Big Tech companies from colluding with the federal government to inform their political censorship sprees, after the White House has repeatedly bragged about exploiting its relationships with social media companies to suppress information the Biden administration deems “problematic.”

In the motion, Missouri AG Eric Schmitt and Louisiana AG Jeff Landry argue that the Biden administration, in partnership with Meta (formerly Facebook), Twitter, Google’s YouTube, and other Silicon Valley giants, has taken advantage of Big Tech’s grip on the social media platform market to suppress any speech contrary to their chosen narrative.

“Freedom of speech is the very bedrock of this great nation, and needs to be protected and preserved. The federal government’s alleged attempts to collude with social media companies to censor free speech should terrify Missourians and Americans alike,” Schmitt said in a statement. “The federal government must be halted from silencing any more Americans, and this motion for preliminary injunction intends to do just that.”

The fed-inspired decision to “shadow-ban, de-platform, de-monetize, de-boost, restrict content access, and suspend many speakers, both temporarily and permanently,” a press release announcing the motion states, has silenced people “from doctors and scientists, to the owner of a conservative radio show, to everyday Americans who dare to voice their opinion in the public sphere.”

As noted by the state attorneys, it was during the height of the government’s panic over Covid-19 that Big Tech censored the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration who criticized the bureaucrats calling for continuous national lockdowns. The “extensive social-media censorship on multiple platforms” endured by authors such as Dr. Martin Kulldorff and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya came shortly after emails between then-Director of the National Institutes of Health Dr. Francis Collins and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci demanding a “quick and devastating … takedown” of the group’s criticism.

The motion follows a complaint from the state attorneys last month against the Biden administration and other federal officials for engaging in “open and explicit censorship programs” such as the Department of Homeland Security’s “Disinformation Governance Board.”

“Having threatened and cajoled social-media platforms for years to censor viewpoints and speakers disfavored by the Left, senior government officials in the Executive Branch have moved into a phase of open collusion with social-media companies to suppress disfavored speakers, viewpoints, and content on social-media platforms under the Orwellian guise of halting so-called ‘disinformation,’ ‘misinformation,’ and ‘malinformation,’” the original petition states.


Jordan Boyd is a staff writer at The Federalist and co-producer of The Federalist Radio Hour. Her work has also been featured in The Daily Wire and Fox News. Jordan graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow her on Twitter @jordanboydtx.

Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)