Happening now: the Second Agricultural Revolution

Happening now: the Second Agricultural Revolution


by Steve Cook

This meme really nails it. And sets a fine example. If you want to find out more about the Detroit Agrihood, click here. 

Apparently there are

now over 200 of these agrihoods in the US alone.

Here in the UK I know of three similar projects just in the vicinity of the small town where I live.

There is no shortage of knowhow and every “how to” you ever wanted to know is now accessible through the internet. We are living in a Golden Age of Knowhow.

Land

There is no shortage of land that can be fruitfully cultivated using that freely available and easy-to-learn knowhow. A few years ago I had occasion to do a lot of walking. Walking the countryside around my home town instead of seeing it from a car I discovered very intimately how much land is just sitting there unused. Leave your car at home and go walkabout and LOOK and you’ll see what I mean. Even in a densely populated country such as England I realised that AT LEAST two thirds of the land is unitilised, with grass and tress and scrub and so forth just growing wild.

Time

There is no shortage of time. Mechanisation of our technologically advanced culture has brought about sufficient free leisure time for us to have some fun growing our own food. Having recently joined a new cooperative of like minded people who each spend a few hours a week on permaculture of a large field that was just sitting there wild, unitilised and “unsuitable” for farming we already have our first crops growing in our first month. The time we have spent on it has not consumed all our spare time but we will soon have self reliance in food to show for it. And boy are we having fun, fresh air and exercise!

So the time is there provided you don’t waste it sitting in front of the telly and get into ACTION.

The purpose

We have the land, the time and the knowledge. Add to that, the WILL.

The only way the globalist enemies of humanity can engineer a food shortage that can then be used to kill or cow humankind is if we all sit there in apathy.

Fortunately I have seen that very large numbers of people have no intention of sitting there in apathy. Self reliant food growing is spreading like wildfire,. There is a Renaissance and an Agricultural Revolution going on.

The planet is not overpopulated.

It has merely been until now very very badly run.

Ironically the political-corporate “aristocracy” responsible for the mismanaged mess and engineered “food shortages” are the ones pushing the “overpopulation” lie.

The lie is touted to justify their psychotic mismanagement and make humanity “guilty” of the crime of being there.


Visit People’s Media at Liberty Rising

www.strong-voices.net

This article is from UK Reloaded


••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

Court Sides in Favor of Petitioners; Overturns EPA Decision that Glyphosate (in Roundup) is Safe for Humans, Imperiled Wildlife

Court Sides in Favor of Petitioners; Overturns EPA Decision that Glyphosate (in Roundup) is Safe for Humans, Imperiled Wildlife

Thanks to the petitioners who took legal action, the EPA must now re-evaluate glyphosate’s risks.

From Sustainable Pulse:

US Appeals Court Forces EPA to Reassess Glyphosate on Health and Environmental Impact

In a historic victory for farmworkers and the environment on Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit sided with Center for Food Safety (CFS) and its represented farmworker and conservation clients by overturning the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) decision that the toxic pesticide glyphosate is safe for humans and imperiled wildlife. Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Monsanto-Bayer’s flagship Roundup weedkiller, the most widely used pesticide in the world.

The 54-page opinion held the Trump administration’s 2020 interim registration of glyphosate to be unlawful because “EPA did not adequately consider whether glyphosate causes cancer and shirked its duties under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).” Represented by Center for Food Safety, the petitioners in the lawsuit included the Rural Coalition, Farmworker Association of Florida, Organización en California de Lideres Campesinas, and Beyond Pesticides. A consolidated case is led by Natural Resources Defense Council and includes Pesticide Action Network.

“Today’s decision gives voice to those who suffer from glyphosate’s cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma,”said Amy van Saun, senior attorney with Center for Food Safety and lead counsel in the case. “EPA’s ‘no cancer’ risk conclusion did not stand up to scrutiny. Today is a major victory for farmworkers and others exposed to glyphosate. Imperiled wildlife also won today, as the court agreed that EPA needed to ensure the safety of endangered species before greenlighting glyphosate.”

“We welcome and applaud the court on this significant decision,” said Jeannie Economos, Pesticide Safety and Environmental Health Project Coordinator at the Farmworker Association of Florida, a plaintiff in the case. While it comes too late for many farmworkers and landscapers who suffer after glyphosate exposure, we are grateful for the court’s ruling, and hope that now EPA will act quickly to protect future workers from illness and disease resulting from this toxic pesticide.”

As to its cancer conclusion, the court concluded that EPA flouted its own Cancer Guidelines and ignored the criticisms of its own experts. EPA’s “not likely to cause cancer” conclusion was inconsistent with the evidence before it, in the form of both epidemiological studies (real-world cancer cases) and lab animal studies. In addition to its lack of conclusion as to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma risk (the cancer most tied to glyphosate), the court also concluded that EPA’s general “no cancer” decision was divorced from its own Guidelines and experts when EPA selectively discounted evidence that glyphosate causes tumors in animals. At various points the Court criticized EPA’s “disregard of tumor results;” its use of “bare assertions” that “fail to account coherently for the evidence;” making conclusions that do not “withstand scrutiny under the agency’s own framework,” and “failing to abide by” its cancer guidelines. In sum the court noted EPA’s “inconsistent reasoning” made its decision on cancer “arbitrary,” and struck it down.

“We are grateful that the court decided in our favor,” said John Zippert, chairperson of the Rural Coalition, a plaintiff in the case. “We need to halt glyphosate’s devastating impact on the farmworkers and farmers who suffer the deepest consequences of exposure. This decision will hopefully hasten the transition to farming and gardening methods and practices that increase resilience, protecting our children, our planet, and all those who feed us.”

“EPA’s failure to act on the science, as detailed in the litigation, has real-world adverse health consequences for farmworkers, the public, and ecosystems,” said Jay Feldman, executive director of Beyond Pesticides, a plaintiff in the case.”Because of this lawsuit, the agency’s obstruction of the regulatory process will not be allowed to stand, and EPA should start shifting food production to available alternative non- and less-toxic practices and materials that meet its statutory duty.”

The court went on to conclude that EPA’s decision also violated the Endangered Species Act. As the court noted, EPA itself elsewhere had admitted that “glyphosate ‘may affect’ all listed species experiencing glyphosate exposure—that is 1,795 endangered or threatened species” yet had unlawfully ignored the ESA for this decision.

As to remedy, the court struck down, or vacated the human health assessment. The court also required that EPA redo and/or finish all remaining glyphosate determinations by an October 2022 deadline, or within four months. This includes a redone ecological toxicity assessment, a redone costs analysis of impacts to farmers from pesticide harms, as well as all Endangered Species analysis and mitigation.

Background

In an “interim registration review” decision for glyphosate issued in January 2020, EPA finalized its human health and ecological risk assessments and adopted “mitigation measures” in the form of label changes. EPA unlawfully concluded there is no cancer risk from glyphosate, despite major gaps in its review, including coming to “no conclusion” as to non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the most well-known cancer linked to glyphosate. EPA also failed to do any assessment of how much glyphosate gets into a user’s bloodstream after skin contact, a major route of occupational exposure.

Critically, EPA failed to test any of the glyphosate product formulations, which contain ingredients beyond just the active ingredient (glyphosate) and can increase the harmful effects of pesticide exposure. Finally, because EPA continued to the use of glyphosate with minor, unsubstantiated label changes, it needed to consider the impacts to imperiled species and do more to protect them from glyphosate.

CFS and allies originally filed the lawsuit in 2020, incorporating volumes of evidence showing how EPA ignored glyphosate’s health risks, including cancer risks, to farmworkers and farmers exposed during spraying. Petitioners also challenged EPA’s decision based on risks to the environment and imperiled species, such as the Monarch butterfly.

In response to CFS and allies’ lawsuit, in May 2021 EPA effectively admitted grave errors in its interim registration and asked the court for permission to re-do the agency’s faulty ecological, cost-benefit, and Endangered Species Act assessments. However, the agency stated that Roundup should nonetheless stay on the market in the interim—without any deadline for a new decision.

In July 2021, Bayer announced it will end the sales of its glyphosate-based herbicides (including Roundup) in the U.S. residential lawn and garden market in 2023 in order to “manage litigation risk and not because of any safety concerns.” In California, jury trials continue to be held. Last year, courts affirmed a judgment against Monsanto for cancer from Roundup in Hardeman v. Monsanto—one of the first in a series of high-profile consumer lawsuits filed against Monsanto-Bayer—and in the third appeal of such a claim in Pilliod v. Monsanto.

While EPA has repeatedly declared that glyphosate does not cause cancer, the world’s foremost cancer authorities with the World Health Organization declared glyphosate to be ‘probably carcinogenic to humans‘ in 2015. And as the record in the case showed, EPA’s own Office of Research and Development concluded that glyphosate is either a likely carcinogen or at least there is evidence suggesting that it causes cancer, particularly increases the risk of NHL.


Source:https://sustainablepulse.com/2022/06/18/us-appeals-court-forces-epa-to-reassess-glyphosate-on-health-and-environmental-impact/#.YsKnrHbMKM8
https://www.activistpost.com/2022/06/court-sides-in-favor-of-petitioners-overturns-epa-decision-that-glyphosate-in-roundup-is-safe-for-humans-imperiled-wildlife.html

Source

Lost Arts Radio Show #393 – Special Guest Dr. Chris Busby

Lost Arts Radio Show #393 – Special Guest Dr. Chris Busby

Visit this page on Lost Arts Radio’s website

The Basics Of Nuclear Weapons & Power – Dr. Chris Busby’s “Mini-Class”

Lost Arts Radio Show on Sunday 7/3/22

Listen online: www.blogtalkradio.com/lostartsradio

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/lostartsradio

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lostartsradio

https://live.ahava528.com/channel/Lostartsradio

https://www.facebook.com/lostartsradio/videos

Listen via phone (during show time): 657-383-1002

9pm EST / 6pm PST

Tell Your Friends!

Dr. Chris Busby

Dr. Chris Busby‘s (www.llrc.org) (www.euradcom.eu) (www.greenaudit.org) long career is mostly focused on the actual effects of radiation on living tissues, but he also has a clear grasp of how nuclear weapons and power generation work. And unlike some high-level experts who may lack the ability to communicate well with the general public, he is also good at making his points understandable in simple but accurate terms. With the very real threat of nuclear war and annihilation hanging over all of our heads, thanks to the belligerent policies and actions of NATO and the covert rulers of the U.S. who are trying to destroy America and the world in many ways at once, I felt it would be a good time to get an introduction (or refresher) on nuclear basics. Dr. Busby was my first choice to teach it, if he would agree, which he graciously did.

I had another reason to address this subject now. There have been some videos going around the internet saying that nuclear weapons, nuclear power and radiation actually don’t exist. They seem to stem mostly from people’s understanding of talks given by nuclear expert Galen Winsor, and commented on by others (https://youtu.be/ePr0_H-gJ_M). I located a fairly comprehensive presentation of Galen Winsor’s main points and sent it to Dr. Busby to review (https://www.bitchute.com/video/LLBMIt3d94qG/) before the show. This should add an additional level of interest to an already high-priority topic. From watching the video, I did not see Galen say nukes and radiation don’t exist or that nuclear power is not real, he seems clearly to believe in all three. But he does say radiation is not dangerous in the ways we are told. My attitude is I am here to learn something as you are, not to defend any personal beliefs or labels, but to see what another high- level expert in the nuclear field with decades of hands-on experience of the damage cased by nuclear radiation in many forms has to say. Neither Galen Winsor nor Dr. Busby is beholden to government or corporate controllers, as far as I can tell. I’ll be in the classroom with you, and I’m looking forward to an interesting learning experience.

For those of you who would like to support our work, help keep us on the air in the face of massive censorship, and help us fund the projects we have waiting in the wings, please visit our new Subscribe Star page and tell others. It can be found at www.subscribestar.com/lostartsradio.

Also, please remember that as the censorship heats up and major platforms have begun removing key Lost Arts Radio videos, you can stay in touch with us at www.lostartsradio.com (get on our mailing list there so we can reach you with important information if and when more of our usual platforms disappear). We also have a new video channel at www.brighteon.com/channel/lostartsradio, an alternative to YouTube created by Mike Adams of Natural News, to avoid censorship. The platform there is quickly developing and it will soon be possible to subscribe to our Brighteon Channel. Videos from Lost Arts are there now, waiting for you. By watching them there, you can help Brighteon grow.

Join me, your host Richard Sacks, every week for fascinating discussions, amazing guests and useful information that you will not want to miss. If you want to support our work, please use the Donate button on our website, www.lostartsradio.com, and tell others about the show. Also, when you shop at Amazon for anything, instead of going to their usual website, go to smile.amazon.com. You can do all the same shopping at exactly the same prices. But 1/2% of what you spend goes to help our work. It will ask you what IRS-approved non-profit you want to support, and just choose Lost Arts Research Institute in Arizona.

In addition to the Sunday shows and livestreams that introduce you to inspiring people and projects (www.lostartsradio.com), we are also entering our second year with Planetary Healing Club (www.planetaryhealingclub.com). PHC is a private, members-only platform, a supportive and interactive environment where I can speak with you freely about information that would be censored on the usual public platforms where most of our audio and video presentations are found. PHC is for you, when you’re ready to really get deeply into special self-healing protocols and start transforming your life for the better. I’m there live to meet and talk with you every week. It’s interactive, with live chat and plenty of time for Q&A, comments and any input you want to contribute. It’s a rare opportunity for those ready to experience a radically better quality of life, and willing to do the work on themselves to make it happen. Learn more about it at www.planetaryhealingclub.com.

Finally, don’t forget our news show on national and world events, for one hour every week at 7:30pm EST / 4:30pm PST, called Lost Arts Radio Live (www.lostartsradio.com/live). It’s where we look at some events of the past week, and what the significance is for your life and for the future of our world. After “Lost Arts Radio Live” is a half-hour break, followed by our weekly meeting of the Planetary Healing Club, which you can join for a minimum donation of just $25/month at www.planetaryhealingclub.com. Meet me there when you’re ready to transform your experience of life for the better.

Richard Sacks, Host

https://lostartsradio.com
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/lostartsradio
http://youtube.lostartsradio.com
http://itunes.lostartsradio.com
http://www.mixcloud.com/lostartsradio

Archive of show

Source

Joe Says No: Biden White House Blocks New Atlantic, Pacific Oceans Drilling as Global Energy Demand Soars

U.S. President Joe Biden has proposed blocking all new drilling in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans as the world cries out for more energy from more sources far from Russia, the Middle East, and the OPEC oil cartel.

Biden is also moving to shut down exploration and production of oil and gas on onshore federal lands while acknowledging the importance of fossil fuels in the U.S. energy landscape, as Breitbart News reported.

A plan released Friday shows the White House proposed no more than 10 potential lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico, an option for one potential lease sale in the northern portion of the Cook Inlet of Alaska, and no lease sales for the Atlantic or Pacific planning areas over the 2023-2028 period.

UPI reports this is not a final determination of what sales will be included, but any area or sale not included in the proposal will be off-limits during the five-year period, the Department of Interior’s Board of Ocean Energy Management noted.

During a legislative session earlier this year, Democrats had urged Biden to do more to stop offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

The plea followed his administration breaking his campaign promise to ban new oil and natural gas leases on public lands and waters in November by approving new oil drilling leases on 1.7 million acres of federal land in the Gulf of Mexico.

The Biden administration is also under pressure from Republican-leaning states, including 14 states that sued his administration for suspending the leasing of new oil and gas drilling on federal lands, arguing it drove up energy costs, the UPI report outlined.

The White house had paused oil and gas leases in February amid a fight with Republican states over the use of carbon cost metric that put a high cost on emissions damage, but resumed them a few months ago under pressure to lower energy costs.

Follow Simon Kent on Twitter: or e-mail to: skent@breitbart.com

Source

John Kerry and the Great Climate Racket [Video]

John Kerry and the Great Climate Racket [Video]


John Kerry and the Great Climate Racket

NEWS WIRE

There is no better racket than the climate change game.

Currently, the rotating seat for heading Washington’s green mafia is occupied by former Secretary of State, John Kerry. His job is to crow about saving the planet while racking-up as many air miles as possible while setting up his own private political and business empire.

Kerry has also got his own climate propaganda organization called, World War Zero, where he and others spread the idea that all of humanity’s problems – from mass global migration, to famine, to war – are all caused by climate change.

It’s all about portraying a crisis of catastrophic proportions, and demanding an ‘urgent global response.’ Problem, reaction, solution.

‘Jesse Watters Primetime’ host questions John Kerry’s business dealings, and asks why taxpayers must foot the bill for the Biden climate tzar’s jet-set business empire-building escapades….

*********

(TLB) published this video report from 21WIRE

READ MORE CLIMATE CHANGE NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Climate Change Files

SUPPORT 21WIRE’s INDEPENDENT MEDIA PLATFORM – BECOME A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV

Header featured image (edited) credit:  Kerry on phone/Gerry Images

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

Biden Climate Advisor Is Happy About American Job Losses [Video]

Biden Climate Advisor Is Happy About American Job Losses [Video]


Biden Climate Advisor Is Happy About American Job Losses

American oil producers lost more than 31,000 jobs last year

Steve Watson

One of Joe Biden’s senior advisors bragged this week about how the administration’s forced transition to green energy is causing people working in the fossil fuels industry to lose their jobs.

Speaking from the Aspen Ideas Festival, Biden’s climate advisor Gina McCarthy stated “We have opportunities now to transfer to clean energy in a way that grows thousands of jobs. We just had a recent report that is showing that all of the energy and the employment stats from last year. Clean energy is winning. Fossil fuels losing jobs.”

McCarthy is referring to a Department of Energy (DOE) report that reveals American oil producers lost more than 31,000 jobs last year, while American coal producers lost over 7,000 jobs.

McCarthy bragged that jobs had been created in green energy sectors, without explaining that those sectors fulfil less than 20 percent of the country’s energy needs.

McCarthy previously called for anyone criticising the green energy transition to be silenced and censored.

The administration has spent two years trying to “end” the fossil fuel sector, and is openly bragging about it, meanwhile Biden is threatening oil companies in an effort to try to get them to produce more.

Independent Petroleum Association of America spokesperson Jennifer Marsteller reacted to the DOE report by saying it “is not only reflective of the broader pandemic slowdown, but also highlights an Administration that has worked overtime on restricting American natural gas and oil production.”

Meanwhile, in the midst of a supply chain crisis, Biden’s climate czar John Kerry is pushing for ‘green shipping’, the infrastructure for which also does not even exist.

Kerry made the comments from a conference in Portugal. Presumably he got there on a private jet as per usual.

Kerry has also previously called the loss of jobs in the fossil fuels energy sector a necessary ‘sacrifice’:

*********

(TLB) published this article from Summit News as compiled and written by Steve Watson


Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here. Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Also, we urgently need your financial support here.


Header featured image (edited) credit:   Gina McCarthy/Twitter grab

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

Climate Scientist Says Humans Cause Less Than 0.05°C of Global Warming and Warns of “Anarchy” From “Delusional” Net Zero Policies

Climate Scientist Says Humans Cause Less Than 0.05°C of Global Warming and Warns of “Anarchy” From “Delusional” Net Zero Policies


ER Editor: This seems like a good time to bring up an article we published back in 2018 based on the doctoral research (90 pages of an appendix) by Dr. John McLean of James Cook University, who drilled down into the raw temperature data (called HadCRUT 4) on which the ‘climate change’ or ‘global warming’ hypothesis is based and found it to be of first-year undergraduate quality, i.e. it wasn’t fit for purpose. See

Climate Alarmists’ Temperature Data Erroneous and Incomplete Says Researcher

This article links to others:

UPDATE – BOMBSHELL: audit of global warming data finds it riddled with errors

Claims of 70 problems found with key temperature dataset used by climate models.

********

Climate Scientist Says Humans Cause Less Than 0.05°C of Global Warming and Warns of “Anarchy” From “Delusional” Net Zero Policies

CHRIS MORRISON

With Germany scouring the world for supplies of oil and gas and firing up dormant coal power stations, one of its most distinguished atmospheric scientists, Professor Hermann Harde, has castigated politicians for reacting to increasingly shrill climate horror stories and “believing they can save the world”. Many of the research studies and “horror scenarios” are not based on a secure physical foundation, he says, “but rather represent computer games that reflect what was fed in”.

The idea that humans can control the climate with their COemissions is said to be an “absolute delusion”.

In Professor Harde’s view, there exists considerable doubt about a “scientifically untenable thesis” of purely human-caused climate change, “and it is completely wrong to assume that 97% of climate scientists, or even more, would assume only anthropogenic warming”. In his view, climate and energy policy can only gain popular acceptance when they are based on reliable knowledge, “and not on speculations or belief”. Harde retired a few years ago from Helmut Schmidt University in Hamburg as Professor of Experimental Physics after a long career in science academia.

For many years, Germany’s politicians have been able to make virtuous green noises by closing nuclear power stations and banning exploration for fossil fuel. At the same time, the country started importing large quantities oil and gas from an unstable Russia. The war in Ukraine has suddenly brought home to Germany, and the EU, the sheer stupidity of this dangerous policy.

In Harde’s view, the move to impose ‘climate emergency’ policies was led by competition between different research groups to outdo each other predicting horror scenarios. Alarming predictions attracted media attention, “and our decision-makers felt obliged to quickly react”. But, noted Harde, it is absolutely clear that without a reliable and sufficient energy supply, “Germany and many other countries that take such a path will end in anarchy”.

Professor Harde’s research leads him to state that the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change overestimates by five times the thermal effect of doubling carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. He points to the “highly overlapping and saturated absorption bands” of CO2  and water vapour, and the significant reduced effect of greenhouses gases under cloud cover. He goes on to state that the recent increase in CO2 has caused warming of less than 0.3°C over the last century.

He continues:

Since only about 15% of the global CO2 increase is of anthropogenic origin, just 15% of 0.3°C, i.e., less than 0.05°C remains, which can be attributed to humans in the overall balance. In view of this vanishingly small contribution, of which the Germans are only involved with 2.1% [of emissions], it is absurd to assume that an exit from fossil fuels could even remotely have an impact on our climate. Changes of our climate can be traced back to natural interaction processes that exceed our human influence by orders of magnitude.

In Professor Hande’s opinion, modern climate science has developed more as an ideology and world view rather than a serious science. Scientists who question or point to serious inconsistencies about human-caused or anthropogenic global warming, are “publicly discredited” and excluded from research funds. In addition, research contributions in journals are supressed, and in a reference to the recent Professor Peter Ridd case in Australia, placed on leave or dismissed from their university. After all, he notes, this is “settled climate science”, and doubts about the harmful effect of CO2 on the environment and the climate are not allowed, “because it is about nothing less than saving the planet”.

What we call truths, continues Harde, depends to a large extent on our state of knowledge. He suggests that climate science requires a fundamental review of the hypotheses and a shift away from the widely established climate industry. Science must not be misled by commerce, politics or ideology, he says. It is the genuine task of universities and state-funded research institutions “to investigate contradictory issues and to ensure independent, free research that gives us honest answers, even when these answers are often complex and do not fit into a desired political context”. (ER: Ditto for ‘vaccines’ and so much else.)

Harde concludes by warning politicians that it would be an irresponsible environmental and energy policy to continue to ignore serious peer-reviewed scientific publications that show a much smaller human impact on the climate than previously thought. It is also irresponsible to shut down a reliable, adequate and affordable energy supply, to be replaced by millions of wind turbines, “that destroy our nature and shred trillions of birds and insects”.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

************

Source

Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

Shock Horror News: how the mind games are played

Shock Horror News: how the mind games are played


It is useful to understand how the mind games are played and the tricks used by the globalist subversives in government and the media to create hysteria.

The aim is to terrorise the populace by hitting them with bad news sucker punches, shocks intended to leave them dismayed, demoralised and malleable.

People are hit relentlessly with frightening news about viruses, food and others scarcities and so forth and, of course, “climate change”.

With that n mind it is worth taking a look at the “record breaking temperatures” ploy, which is very aptly explained in the following featured article.

The truth about Britain’s ‘record-breaking’ heatwave

Ross Clark

Will temperature records be broken today? You bet they will. By the end of the day you can be sure we’ll be bombarded with headlines along the lines of ‘Records tumble as Britain wilts’ – or, in the case of the Guardian, ‘Record-breaking heat heightens fears of climate crisis’. But don’t get too excited. Read on a little and you will find that the records which have been broken will seem just a little less dramatic than they at first appeared. The reason we keep having ‘record-breaking’ heat is not so much because of climate change – although rising global temperatures are slightly increasing the chances of records being broken – but because there are so many records to break. This is especially the case since it became fashionable for meteorologists to start using daily temperature records: the highest, or lowest, temperatures recorded in a particular location on a particular day of the year.

The trouble is that this creates so many records it is inevitable they are being broken all the time. Last Sunday, the Observer ran the headline ‘US temperatures hit record levels as south west bakes in a heatwave’. If you thought that meant that America has just witnessed its highest temperatures ever, you were in for disappointment. It turned out that the records that had been equalled (not even broken) were the hottest 11 June in Phoenix, Arizona (equalling that measured on the same day in 1956), the hottest 11 June in Las Vegas (equalling 1956) and the hottest 11 June in Denver (equalling 2013).

As for Britain, the Met Office uses a network of 270 automated weather stations around Britain capable of producing instant recordings. Ignoring all other weather stations which could potentially record their highest-ever temperature for 17 June today (with a slight delay), the automated network alone provides a potential for 98,550 daily weather records. No, it won’t mean ‘climate chaos’ if some of these fall – it will simply be an inevitable result of ‘record temperatures’ having become a debased currency.

Visit  Spectator Australia for many more thought-provoking articles


Visit People’s Media at Liberty Rising

www.strong-voices.net

This article is from UK Reloaded


••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)