What Does “Unprovoked” Mean? NATO vs. Russia. Provoked or Unprovoked Invasion?

What Does “Unprovoked” Mean? NATO vs. Russia. Provoked or Unprovoked Invasion?

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

Note the following sentence in a New York Times news story yesterday by Michael Schwirtz and Anton Troianovski about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: “Mr. Putin’s attempt to put a veneer of nobility on an unprovoked invasion that has killed thousands of civilians and turned millions more into refugees was made in the Russian city once known as Stalingrad, on the 80th anniversary of a victory there against Nazi Germany that changed the course of World War II.” (Italics added.)

The operative word is “unprovoked.” 

First of all, it’s a strange word for news reporters to be using because it’s more in the nature of a commentary or editorial. News reporters are supposed to report the news, and the editorial department of a newspaper is supposed to render opinions and commentary on the news. Schwirtz and Troianovski do both in their news article. 

Second, and more important, for the life of me, I cannot understand how Schwirtz and Troianovski are unable to see that Russia’s invasion was provoked. It was provoked knowingly, intentionally, and deliberately.

Now, one could argue that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine wasn’t justified. That’s a different word from “unprovoked.” An invasion can be “provoked” and “unjustified” at the same time. My hunch is that Schwirtz and Troianovski meant to use the word “unjustified” rather than the word “unprovoked.”

When the Berlin Wall came crashing down in 1989, the Soviet Union withdrew its troops from Eastern Europe, the Warsaw Pact was terminated, and the Soviet Union was dismantled. As far was Russia was concerned, the Cold War was over.

Not so, however, for the United States and, specifically, for the Pentagon, the CIA, and the NSA. The Cold War had been very beneficial to the U.S. national-security establishment in terms of ever-increasing power within the federal governmental structure and ever-increasing taxpayer-funded largesse to finance America’s Cold War military machine, including its vast army of voracious “defense” contractors who had become dependent on feeding at the public trough. 

Thus, while Russia was ready to move on, the U.S. national-security establishment was not. It was determined to not let go of its Cold War racket.

NATO had been brought into existence after World War II to ostensibly protect Western Europe from an invasion by the Soviet Union. But the notion of such an invasion was ludicrous from the start. Russia had been devastated by the war. As many as 27 million Soviet citizens were killed as a result of the war. That’s 27 million people! That’s a lot of people. Moreover, the entire industrial might of the country had been decimated. 

The Soviets knew that if they started a war with their former World War II partners and allies, the United States would immediately come to their assistance. The United States had not suffered any damage to its industrial capacity and was still fully capable of fielding a massive army. Moreover, the United States had a monopoly on nuclear bombs and had displayed a willingness to use them against people living in populated cities. Thus, there was never any realistic possibility whatsoever that the Soviet Union was going to invade Western Europe. NATO served no purpose whatsoever. 

Recall that one of the major reasons for all the death and destruction that Russia had experienced during the war was Germany’s surprise invasion of the Soviet Union, an invasion that almost resulted in the German conquest of Russia. German troops made it all the way to Stalingrad before they met with defeat, owing to the tenacity of the Russian people and the brutality of the Russian winter. 

Make no mistake about it: Germany’s near-conquest of their country — and the massive death and destruction wreaked by Germany on their country — was seared into the collective conscience of the Russian people. No Russian generation will ever forget it. Thus, when Germany decides to send tanks to Ukraine in the hopes that Ukraine ultimately joins NATO, which would enable German tanks, troops, and missiles to be aligned on Russia’s border, one should be able to at least understand why the Russian people might feel a bit uneasy about that.

In fact, Schwirtz’s and Troianovski’s news article mocked Russian president Vladimir Putin for using the 80th anniversary of Russia’s victory at Stalingrad to deliver a speech about the war in Ukraine. In their mockery, Schwirtz and Troianovski are clearly unable to draw the link between Germany’s near conquest of Russia and Germany’s current thirst to incorporate Ukraine into NATO, which would enable Germany to put its tanks, missiles, and troops along Russia’s border. 

Once the Cold War was over, NATO had fulfilled its ostensible mission. There was no longer any threat of the Soviet Union invading Western Europe. Thus, this old Cold War dinosaur clearly should have gone extinct.

Instead, the Pentagon decided to keep NATO in existence and, even worse, began using NATO to absorb former members of the Warsaw Pact, which was enabling the United States and Germany to move their troops, missiles, bases, and armaments eastward, i.e., ever closer to Russia’s border. 

Throughout this process, Russia was, not surprisingly, vehemently objecting. Russia continuously asked: If the Cold War was really over, then what was the point of doing this? NATO’s answer was that there was nothing to be concerned about. The United States and Germany were both peace-loving nations that would never aggress against Russia. 

That, of course, is a ridiculous notion. For its part, Germany had already aggressed against the Soviet Union in World War II, which had resulted in 27 million Russian deaths, the total destruction of the country, and the near-conquest of Russia. For its part, the United States was, in the words of Martin Luther King, “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world.” 

How could anyone not understand why Russia would be concerned about NATO’s expansion toward Russia’s border, especially when there was no good reason to do so?

As Russia continuously objected to NATO’s expansion, Russia made it clear that there was one “red line” that would finally provoke a Russian reaction — the threat to absorb Ukraine into NATO. That would enable Germany and the United States to place their tanks, nuclear missiles, bases, armaments, and troops on Russia’s border. Given Germany’s prior invasion of the Soviet Union and the U.S. propensity for violence, that was unacceptable to Russia.

The United States and Germany, operating through NATO, knowingly, intentionally, and deliberately crossed that “red line,” knowing full well that it was a “red line” for Russia. By threatening to absorb Ukraine into NATO, they knew that Russia would respond because Russian had said that it would respond. 

Thus, when President Biden claimed that his “intelligence” had learned that Russia would invade Ukraine, he was being disingenuous. He knew Russia would invade because Russia had been saying it would invade if the United States, Germany, and other NATO powers crossed its “red line” by threatening to absorb Ukraine into NATO.

Thus, there is no doubt that the Pentagon, operating through NATO, did provoke Russia into invading Ukraine. Again, one can argue that the Pentagon’s action did not justify the Russian invasion of Ukraine, but one cannot rationally say that Russia’s invasion was “unprovoked,” as Schwirtz and Troianovski did yesterday in their news story in the New York Times.

Source

Open Letter to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia re Dr. Charles Hoffe, February 6, 2023

Open Letter to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia re Dr. Charles Hoffe, February 6, 2023

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

Open Letter to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia Regarding a Fine British Columbia Physician:  Dr. Charles Douglas Hoffe

Dr. Charles Hoffe has been a physician in the Lytton community of British Columbia for nearly 30 years, looking after a largely native community after having gained his medical schooling from the University of Witwatersrand, the second ranked clinical medical university in South Africa.

A citation has been issued by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia against Dr. Hoffe for (allegedly) publicly spreading misleading information by:

a)    recommending Ivermectin for Covid-19

b)    saying Covid vaccines can cause microscopic blood clots, and

c)    saying that vaccinated persons can cause harm to unvaccinated persons.

I, Elizabeth Woodworth, a retired health sciences librarian who delivered medical literature to the BC Ministry of Health for 25 years, including the Provincial Health Officer and all the regional health officers and the public health nurses, mental health professionals, nutritionists, dental staff and others, wish to point out some of the peer-reviewed literature that has been tragically overlooked by many public health agencies during this pandemic.  Dr. Hoffe, on the other hand, is aware of this literature.

First, although there has been a sustained Big Pharma and media campaign against Ivermectin, the wonderful multi-faceted anti-viral drug that was awarded a Nobel Prize in 2015, and is on the WHO list of essential medicines, there are currently 95 published studies from 1,023 scientists attesting to its efficacy with regard to Covid-19.

Some 20 countries have included Ivermectin in their COVID-19 management strategies.  It is available over-the-counter in South American countries, and as of now, also in Tennessee.

Seldom if ever mentioned in the media is that the FDA cannot legally grant an Emergency Use Authorization for an experimental drug or vaccine if an “adequate, approved, and available alternative” already exists.

Second, it is now well established in the medical literature that blood clots are caused in some mRNA-injected people for Covid-19.

Third, regarding the question of the vaccinated causing harm, since the mRNA injections do not stop transmission of Covid-19, the vaccinated frequently infect the unvaccinated.

Dr. Hoffe has received thirty-two 5-star ratings from his patients online at

https://www.ratemds.com/doctor-ratings/40188/Dr-Charles-Hoffe-Lytton-BC.html/

Finally, regarding the big money behind some of the Covid-19 strategies, epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch, emeritus Prof. of Medicine and Public Health at Yale University, long-time on the editorial board of the Amer. J. Epid., and who has no financial connections to Big Pharma, has written extensively in WSJ, Newsweek, Washington Examiner, Washington Times, and many others about the corruption of the CDC and FDA, who along with the now-corrupted WHO, have led the Covid-19 response.

Elizabeth Woodworth

Head Librarian

B.C. Ministry of Health (1978-2002)

Victoria, BC

Source

Nuclear War. “90 Seconds to Midnight”: The Pentagon’s 1945 “Doomsday Blueprint” to “Wipe the Soviet Union off the Map”

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (Desk Top version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

Author’s Introduction 

My  long-standing commitment is to “the value of human life”,  “the criminalization of  war” , “peaceful co-existence” between nation states and “the future of humanity” which is currently threatened by nuclear war.

I have been researching nuclear war for than more 10 years focussing on its historical, strategic and geopolitical dimensions as well as its criminal features as a means to implementing what is best described as “genocide on a massive scale”.  

What is presented below is the history of nuclear war: a succession of U.S. nuclear war plans going back to the Manhattan Project and the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945.

Unknown to the broader public, the first U.S. Doomsday Blueprint of a nuclear attack directed against the Soviet Union was formulated by the US War Department on September 15, 1945 when the US and the Soviet Union were allies.

There is an element of political delusion and paranoia in the formulation of US foreign policy. The Doomsday Scenario has been on the drawing board of the Pentagon for more than 70 years. 

Numerous US nuclear war plans have been formulated from the outset, leading up to “The 1956  Strategic Air Command SAC Atomic Weapons Requirements Study” (Declassified in December 2015) which consisted in targeting 1200 urban areas in the Soviet Union, Eastern Europe and China.

Much of what is presented below is the object of media censorship. It is either trivialized (casually compared to the imminent dangers of CO2), or it goes unreported. 

The use of nuclear weapons in the present context would inevitably lead to escalation and the end of humanity as we know it.  

Ask yourself: is this not tantamount to the planning of genocide on an unprecedented scale not only against Russia or China but inevitably against humanity in its entirety. 

Dear Readers: please forward this article to your friends and colleagues. 

What is required in to break the fragile political consensus on the use of nuclear weapons. It is not a “protest movement” which is required, it is a mass movement which questions the legitimacy of the decision-makers in high office who consider that “a  nuclear war is winnable”

Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, January 31, 2023

***

90 Seconds to Midnight according to the Doomsday Clock. The Nobel Peace Laureates are casually blaming Russia, without recalling the history of nuclear war, not to mention Joe Biden’s 1.3 trillion dollar program to develop “more usable”, “low intensity” “preemptive nuclear weapons” to be used on a “first strike basis” against both nuclear and non nuclear states as a means of “self defense”. 

Let us recall the history of  the “doomsday scenario” which was part of America’s Manhattan project launched in 1939 with the participation of Britain and Canada. 

The Manhattan Project was a  secret plan to develop the atomic bomb coordinated by the US War Department, headed (1941) by Lieutenant General Leslie Groves.

Prominent physicist  DrJ. Robert Oppenheimer  had been appointed by Lt General Groves to head the Los Alamos Laboratory (also known as Project Y) which was established in 1943 as a “top-secret site for designing atomic bombs under the Manhattan Project”. Oppenheimer was entrusted in recruiting and coordinating a team of prominent nuclear scientists including Italian Physicist and Nobel Prize Laureate Dr. Enrico Fermi who joined the Los Alamos Laboratory in 1944. 

Oppenheimer not only played a key role in coordinating the team of nuclear scientists, he was also engaged in routine consultations with the head of the Manhattan project Lieutenant General Groves, specifically with regard to the use of the first atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which resulted in more than 300,000 immediate deaths.

Below is the Transcript of an August 6, 1945 telephone conversation, declassified (Between Gen. Groves and Dr. Oppenheimer) hours after the Hiroshima bombing:

Gen. G. I am very proud of you and your people [nuclear scientists]

Dr. O. It went alright?

Gen. G. Apparently it went with a tremendous bang.

screenshot below, click link to access complete transcript )

The September 15, 1945 Blueprint to “Wipe the Soviet Union off the Map”

Barely two weeks after the official end of World War II (September 2, 1945), the US War Department issued  a blueprint  (September 15, 1945) to “Wipe  the Soviet Union off the Map” (66 cities with 204 atomic bombs), when the US and the USSR were allies. This infamous project is confirmed by declassified documents. (For further details see Chossudovsky, 2017)

Below is the image of the 66 cities of the Soviet Union which had been envisaged as targets by the US War Department.

The 66 cities. Click image to enlarge 

The Hiroshima Nagasaki “Dress Rehearsal “

The preparatory documents (see below) confirm that the data pertaining to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks were being used to evaluate the viability as well as the cost of  a much larger attack against the Soviet Union. These documents were finalized 5-6 weeks after the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings (6, 9 August 1945).

Note the correspondence between Major General Norstad and the head of the Manhattan Project, General Leslie Groves:

On September 15, 1945 Norstad sent a memorandum to Lieutenant Leslie Groves requesting an estimate of  the “number of bombs required to ensure our national security”  ( The First Atomic Stockpile Requirements )

Lieutenant General Groves responded to Norstad in a Memorandum dated September 29, 1945 in which he refers to Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

See section 2, subsections a, b and c.

“It is not essential to get total destruction of a city in order to destroy its effectiveness. Hiroshima no longer exists as a city even though the area of total destruction is considerably less than total.”

Read carefully. The text below confirms that Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a Dress Rehearsal.  Bear in mind the name of the country which is threatening America’s “national security” is not mentioned.

The 1949 “Dropshot Plan”: 300 Nuclear Bombs, Targeting More than 100 Soviet Cities

Numerous US war plans (under the Truman presidency) to attack the Soviet Union were “formulated and revised on a regular basis between 1945 and 1950”. Most of them were totally dysfunctional as outlined by J.W. Smith in his book entitled “The World’s Wasted Wealth 2”.

“The names given to these plans graphically portray their offensive purpose: Bushwhacker, Broiler, Sizzle, Shakedown, Offtackle, Dropshot, Trojan, Pincher, and Frolic. The US military knew the offensive nature of the job President Truman had ordered them to prepare for and had named their war plans accordingly”

Dr. Michio Kaku and Daniel Axelrod in their book entitled:

“To Win a Nuclear War: the Pentagon’s Secret War Plans,”

provides evidence (based on declassified documents) that the September 1945 blueprint was followed by a continuous plan by USG to bomb the Soviet Union (as well as Russia in the post-Cold War era):

“This book [preface by Ramsey Clark] compels us to re-think and re-write the history of the Cold War and the arms race… It provides a startling glimpse into secret U.S. plans to initiate a nuclear war from 1945 to the present.”

The September 1945 Blue Print (66 Cities) was followed in 1949 by another insidious project entitled the Dropshot Plan: 

According to Kaku and Axelrod, the 1949 DropShot consisted of  a plan directed against the Soviet Union to “drop at least 300 nuclear bombs and 20,000 tons of conventional bombs on 200 targets in 100 urban areas, including Moscow and Leningrad (St. Petersburg). According to the plan Washington would start the war on January 1, 1957.”

The Dropshot Plan was formulated prior to Russia’s August 1949 announcement pertaining to the testing of its nuclear bomb.

The Cold War List of 1200 Targeted Cities

The initial 1945 Blueprint to attack 66 cities, the subsequent 1949 Dropshot Plan (targeting 100 cities) were updated in the course of the Cold War. The 1956 Plan included some 1200 cities in the USSR, the Soviet block countries of Eastern Europe and China (see declassified documents below).

The bombs slated for the attack significantly more powerful in terms of explosive capacity than those dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (see below)

We are talking about planned genocide against the Soviet Union, China and Eastern Europe .

Excerpt from list of the 1200 cities targeted for nuclear attack in alphabetical order. National Security Archive, op. cit.

Details pertaining to the The SAC [Strategic Air Command] Atomic Weapons Requirements Study for 1959, produced in June 1956 were declassified on December 22, 2015 (Excerpts below, click to access full text).

According to the National Security Archive www.nsarchive.org, the SAC, 1956: 

“…provides the most comprehensive and detailed list of nuclear targets and target systems that has ever been declassified. As far as can be told, no comparable document has ever been declassified for any period of Cold War history.

The SAC study includes chilling details. …  the authors developed a plan for the “systematic destruction” of Soviet bloc urban-industrial targets that specifically and explicitly targeted “population” in all cities, including Beijing, Moscow, Leningrad, East Berlin, and Warsaw.  

The SAC document includes lists of more than 1100 airfields in the Soviet bloc, with a priority number assigned to each base. …

A second list was of urban-industrial areas identified for “systematic destruction.”  SAC listed over 1200 cities in the Soviet bloc, from East Germany to China, also with priorities established.  Moscow and Leningrad were priority one and two respectively.  Moscow included 179 Designated Ground Zeros (DGZs) while Leningrad had 145, including “population” targets.  … According to the study, SAC would have targeted Air Power targets with bombs ranging from 1.7 to 9 megatons. 

Exploding them at ground level, as planned, would have produced significant fallout hazards to nearby civilians.  SAC also wanted a 60 megaton weapon which it believed necessary for deterrence, but also because it would produce “significant results” in the event of a Soviet surprise attack. One megaton would be 70 times the explosive yield of the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima.  (emphasis added).

Read carefully:

Had this diabolical project been carried out against the Soviet Union and its allies, the death toll would be beyond description (ie. when compared to Hiroshima. 100,000 immediate deaths). The smallest nuclear bomb contemplated had an explosive yield of 1.7 megatons, 119 times more “powerful’ than a Hiroshima bomb (15 kilotons of TNT)

The 9 megaton bomb mentioned above was 630 times a Hiroshima bomb, The 60 megaton bomb:  4200 times a Hiroshima bomb. 

The Bulletin: Founded by Manhattan Project Scientists in September 1945

In a bitter irony, in the immediate wake of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists was founded in 1945 in Chicago by Manhattan Project scientists, who had been involved in the development of the atomic bomb.

Nuclear warTwo years later, in 1947, The Bulletin devised the Doomsday Clock, “with an original setting of seven minutes to midnight”.

The initiative was formulated at a time when there was no arms race: There was only one nuclear weapons state, namely the USA, which was intent upon carrying out a Doomsday scenario (genocide) against the Soviet Union formulated in September 1945.

In 1947, when the Doomsday Clock was created, the “justification” which was upheld by The Bulletin was that:

“the greatest danger to humanity came … from the prospect that the United States and the Soviet Union were headed for a nuclear arms race.”

The underlying premise of this statement was to ensure that the US retain a monopoly over nuclear weapons.

While in 1947, “The Plan to Wipe the Soviet Union of the Map” was still on the drawing Board of the Pentagon, the relevant documents were declassified thirty years later in 1975. Most of the former Manhattan project scientists were not aware of the September 1945 blueprint against the Soviet Union.

The Soviet Union emerged as a nuclear power in August 1949, two years after the launching of the Doomsday Clock, largely in view of applying what was later entitled “deterrence”, namely an action to discourage a nuclear attack by the US. At the height of the Cold War and the Arms Race, this concept eventually evolved into what was defined as “Mutually Assured Destruction”.

While several authors and scientists featured by The Bulletin have provided a critical perspective concerning America’s nuclear weapons program, there was no cohesive attempt to question the history nor the legitimacy of  the Manhattan Project.

The broader tendency has been to “erase history”, sustaining the “rightfulness” of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, while also casually placing the blame on Russia, as well as China and North Korea.

Nuclear War versus the “Imminent Dangers of CO2”

In the last fews years, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists “seeks to provide relevant information about nuclear weapons, climate change, and other global security issues”.

According to Mary Robinson, Chair of The Doomsday Clock Elders and former President of the Republic of Ireland (2023 statement):

The Doomsday Clock is sounding an alarm for the whole of humanity. We are on the brink of a precipice. … From cutting carbon emissions to strengthening arms control treaties and investing in pandemic preparedness, we know what needs to be done. … We are facing multiple, existential crises. Leaders need a crisis mindset. (emphasis added)

CO2 is casually put forth as a danger to humanity comparable to nuclear war.

The Doomsday Clock is now said to “represent threats to humanity from a variety of sources” according to a collective of Nobel Prize Laureates.

What nonsense.

2023  January Statement, ScreenShot from WP

Presenting C02 or Covid as a danger comparable to nuclear war is an outright lie. Its intent is to mislead public opinion. It is part of a rather unsubtle propaganda campaign which provides legitimacy to the US doctrine of first strike “preemptive nuclear war”, i.e. nuclear war as a means of “self-defense”.

What is of concern is that U.S. decision makers including Joe Biden believe in their own propaganda, that a preemptive first strike nuclear war against Russia is “winnable”. And that tactical nuclear weapons are “instruments of peace”.

Meanwhile history is erased. America’s persistent role in developing “a Doomsday Agenda” (aka genocide) since the onslaught of the Manhattan Project in 1939 is simply not mentioned.

What is of concern is that there is a continuous history of numerous projects and WWIII scenarios consisting in “Wiping Russia off the Map” and triggering  a Third World War.

Nuclear war against Russia has been embedded in US military doctrine since 1945.


Related Article

“Preemptive Nuclear War”: The Historic Battle for Peace and Democracy. A Third World War Threatens the Future of Humanity

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, January 31, 2023


Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War” 

by Michel Chossudovsky

Available to order from Global Research! 

ISBN Number: 978-0-9737147-5-3
Year: 2012
Pages: 102

PDF Edition:  $6.50 (sent directly to your email account!)

Michel Chossudovsky is Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), which hosts the critically acclaimed website www.globalresearch.ca . He is a contributor to the Encyclopedia Britannica. His writings have been translated into more than 20 languages.

Reviews

“This book is a ‘must’ resource – a richly documented and systematic diagnosis of the supremely pathological geo-strategic planning of US wars since ‘9-11’ against non-nuclear countries to seize their oil fields and resources under cover of ‘freedom and democracy’.”
John McMurtry, Professor of Philosophy, Guelph University

“In a world where engineered, pre-emptive, or more fashionably “humanitarian” wars of aggression have become the norm, this challenging book may be our final wake-up call.”
-Denis Halliday, Former Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations

Michel Chossudovsky exposes the insanity of our privatized war machine. Iran is being targeted with nuclear weapons as part of a war agenda built on distortions and lies for the purpose of private profit. The real aims are oil, financial hegemony and global control. The price could be nuclear holocaust. When weapons become the hottest export of the world’s only superpower, and diplomats work as salesmen for the defense industry, the whole world is recklessly endangered. If we must have a military, it belongs entirely in the public sector. No one should profit from mass death and destruction.
Ellen Brown, author of ‘Web of Debt’ and president of the Public Banking Institute  

Source

White House-linked Venture Capital Fund Boasts China War Would be Great for Business

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (desktop version)

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

A war between China and Taiwan will be extremely good for business at America’s Frontier Fund, a tech investment outfit whose co-founder and CEO sits on both the State Department Foreign Affairs Policy Board and President Joe Biden’s Intelligence Advisory Board, according to audio from a February 1 event.

The remarks occurred at a tech finance symposium hosted at the Manhattan offices of Silicon Valley Bank. According to attendee Jack Poulson, head of the watchdog group Tech Inquiry, an individual who identified himself as “Tom” attended the event in place of Jordan Blashek, America’s Frontier Fund’s president and chief operating officer.

Following the panel discussion, “Tom” spoke with a gaggle of other attendees and held forth on AFF’s investment in so-called choke points: sectors that would spike in value during a volatile geopolitical crisis, like computer chips or rare earth minerals. It turns out, according to audio published by Poulson, that a war in the Pacific would be tremendous for AFF’s bottom line.

If the China-Taiwan situation happens, some of our investments will 10x, like overnight,” the person who identified as “Tom” said. “So I don’t want to share the name, but the one example I gave was a critical component that … the total market value is $200 million, but it is a critical component to a $50 billion market cap. That’s like a choke point, right. And so if it’s only produced in China, for example, and there’s a kinetic event in the Pacific, that would 10x overnight, like no question about it. There’s a couple of different things like that.”

AFF is surely not the only venture fund that would see stratospheric returns throughout their portfolio in the case of a destabilizing global crisis, like a “kinetic event in the Pacific” — that is to say, war. Unlike most other investment firms, though, AFF is closely tied to the upper echelons of American power, the very people who would craft any response to such a war.

Gilman Louie, AFF’s co-founder and current CEO, serves as chair of the National Intelligence University, advises Biden through his Intelligence Advisory Board, and was tapped for the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Policy Board by Secretary of State Antony Blinken in 2022. Louie previously ran In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capital arm.

In other words, AFF stands to massively profit from a geopolitical crisis while its CEO advises the Biden administration on geopolitical crises. (America’s Frontier Fund did not respond to a request for comment.)

AFF was founded in 2021, according to its website, “to build the companies, platforms, and capabilities that will generate once-in-a-generation returns for investors, while ensuring long-term economic competitiveness for the U.S. and its allies.” Last year, the New York Times reported the techno-nationalist fund had met with U.S. lawmakers to request a $1 billion injection. AFF currently leads the Quad Investor Network, a White House-sponsored alliance of investors from the so-called Quad: a geopolitical bloc aimed at countering Chinese hegemony constituted by the U.S., Australia, India, and Japan.

The fund also has close ties to some of the American private sector’s most vocal and influential China hawks. AFF was founded last year with support from former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, whose closeness to Biden’s government is attracting growing scrutiny and skepticism, and investor Peter Thiel. Thiel and Schmidt, whose business interests in national security and defense both stand to profit immensely from war in the Pacific, have both advocated for a more hostile national stance toward China.

Schmidt is particularly dedicated to China alarmism, having spent much of his post-Google career thus far drumming up anti-China tensions; first at the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, which he chaired, and today through his new think tank, the Special Competitive Studies Project, which regularly depicts China as a direct threat to the United States.

AFF’s own Schmidt connections run deep: Louie, the CEO, worked alongside Schmidt at the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, while Balshek, the fund’s COO, was previously an executive at Schmidt’s philanthropic fund.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Featured image is from TRT World

Source

Ukraine Had Lost the War Before It Even Started

Ukraine Had Lost the War Before It Even Started

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (desktop version)

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

First published on January 25, 2023

In the course of the last 11 months, I have been reviewing on a daily basis numerous carefully documented articles on the unfolding war in Ukraine,

The evolving consensus — after eleven months which emanates from the senior ranks of the US military and intelligence establishment — is that Ukraine “has lost the war”. 

What strikes me in this ingenuous assessment is something which should have been obvious to analysts from the very outset of Russia’s “Special Operation”. 

Ukraine Had Lost the War Before it Even Started

I will start with the obvious, much of which has been confirmed by official sources and analysis. 

From Day One, Russia was involved as part of it’s “Special Operation” in “precision” attacks against Ukrainian military installations, which commenced hours prior to President Putin’s February 24, TV address:  

“I am referring to the eastward expansion of NATO, which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border. It is a fact that over the past thirty years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries …In response,  we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail.”

From one week to the next, Ukraine was without a Navy and without an Air Force, destroyed at the outset in late February, early March 2022.

Part II of this article focusses in detail on another obvious concept, which has not been the object of media coverage or even analysis by the independent media:

Turkey, NATO’s heavyweight is “Sleeping with the Enemy”. It has a military cooperation agreement with Russia

What this means is that under present conditions a US-NATO war against Russia is an impossibility.

The Black Sea is strategic. While the Ukraine coastline is in large part controlled by Russia, Turkey controls the entire Southern coastline of the Black Sea as well as access to the Mediterranean. (under the Montreux protocol) (see map below)

Turkey is playing a double game, it is not acting on behalf of NATO in the war theater. It is “unofficially” collaborating with Russia. The March 2022 failed peace agreements in Istanbul were hosted by the Erdogan government. 

 

The Obvious: How Could Ukraine Win a War without an Air Force and a Navy? 

According to Russian Sources quoted by B. K, Bhadrakumar (March 25, 2022);

The Russian General Staff disclosed that Ukrainian air force and air defence is almost completely destroyed [March 2022], while the country’s Navy no longer exists and about 11.5% of the entire military personnel have been put out of action.

[Quoting Russian sources] Ukraine has lost much of its combat vehicles (tanks, armoured vehicles, etc.), one-third of its multiple launch rocket systems, and well over three-fourths of its missile air defence systems and Tochka-U tactical missile systems.

Sixteen main military airfields in Ukraine have been put out of action, 39 storage bases and arsenals destroyed (which contained up to 70% of all stocks of military equipment, materiel and fuel, and more than 1 million 54000 tons of ammunition.)

Ukraine had not only lost its naval power in the Black Sea, it had also lost its maritime access to the Sea of Azov and Eastern Ukraine.

That happened in February-March of  last year.

The Kerch strait in Eastern Crimea is controlled by Russia. It constitutes a narrow maritime gateway which links the Black Sea to the Sea of Azov.

All major ports on the Sea of Azov are currently under Russian control.

The Dnieper Seaway

The Delta of Ukraine’s major river-way the Dnieper is controlled by Russia, despite Russia’s withdrawal from Kherson.

The Dnieper is a strategic seaway extending from Belarus, Northern Ukraine and Kiev down to the Black Sea.

The Dnieper is a major corridor for Ukraine grain cargo transportation and maritime commodity trade out of the Black Sea, which is controlled by Russia in collaboration with Turkey. (on Turkey’s role, see Part II)

Part II of this article is entitled:

Unspoken Divisions within NATO. “Sleeping with the Enemy” 

Source

China Balloon Opportunism and Hypocrisy

China Balloon Opportunism and Hypocrisy

Day Two of Commie Balloon Madness. The primary feature here is an inflow of “public servant” careerists clogging the interwebs with condemnation of something they hardly understand.

In Neocon slash Neolib Bizarro World, a helium bag the length of three school buses with an unknown payload and solar panels attached has become a declaration of war for the uniparty political class. Consider the former vice president under Orange Man:

.

.

Twitter avatar for @Mike_Pence

Mike Pence @Mike_Pence
Shoot down the Chinese spy balloon. Go ahead and send the Secretary of State to China next week. Have @SecBlinken Look them in the eye and tell em- it better never happen again. That’s Peace Through Strength🇺🇸

I posted yesterday on the infeasibility of this.

Reality, however, is not a strong suit for “representatives” jockeying for attention, as power-hungry narcissists are wont to do.

Here we have a former CIA boss and a former ambassador to the United Nations venting spleen over them damn Chicoms. Note the stern visage.

Pompeo’s Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School is of little help in understanding balloons, missiles, and the Stratosphere.

Politicians and blue-checkers on Twitter are not inclined to compare and contrast. The “threat” posed by what is either an errant weather balloon or a clumsy surveillance device doesn’t hold a candle to the threat of the USG surveillance state.

The National Security Act, signed into law by a nuclear terrorist in 1947, resulted in mass surveillance of the American people. The FBI was established as a political police force, while the CIA concentrated on overthrowing foreign governments (it also violated its supposed charter to spy on domestic antiwar activists).

The Church Committee of the mid-1970s revealed how presidents used the CIA, FBI, and NSA to destroy political enemies (Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon—all employed the FBI to neutralize the opposition). No balloons were required.

The list of subversive, liberty-destroying programs and operations is long and sordid—ECHELON, COINTELPRO, Operation CHAOS, Project Mockingbird, Projects RESISTANCE, MERRIMAC, HT/LINGUAL, and the Cactus program, which tied it all together. This is a short list of known USG anti-liberty programs. No doubt many others remain classified and secret.

Following 9/11, the USG used “terrorism” as an excuse to violate the civil liberties of Americans. The so-called PATRIOT Act was rushed through Congress, resulting in illegal and “warrantless” surveillance of “tens of millions” of Americans.

In 2014, it was revealed the NSA had built a system designed to infect target computers with malware. The USG surveillance state went so far as to masquerade as a Facebook server in an effort to exfiltrate data. The overall objective was to “own the Net.”

The obsessive-compulsive effort by the state to disrupt the constitutionally protected political activity of its subjects—including the destruction of careers, frame-ups, and assassinations—is a topic far too lengthy for this Substack post.

Hypocrisy abounds, even though none of us know for certain what the ominous balloon is meant to do. Regardless, it was exploited to condemn China, resulting in Antony Blinken canceling a trip to the authoritarian crony capitalist “communist” nation.

It should come as no surprise Pence, Pompeo, Haley, and the majority of Congress critters and bureaucrats of the state, not only approve of tyrannical surveillance and “neutralization” of folks not on narrative but also enthusiastically support implanting military bases in foreign lands, thus creating endless tension as it develops and fields ever-evolving mechanics of death and mass murder.

For instance, consider the following:

Imagine the response of the USG if China moved troops near the Canadian and Mexican borders.

The Doomsday Clock would be a nanosecond before midnight.

Source

Video: Say No To World War III. Abolish NATO. Michel Chossudovsky

Video: Say No To World War III. Abolish NATO. Michel Chossudovsky

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

In this interview Michel Chossudovsky explains why A US- NATO war against the Russian Federation is an impossibility.

As part of it’s “Special Operation”, Russia launched “precision” attacks against Ukrainian military installations, which commenced hours prior to President Putin’s February 24, 2022 TV address.

From one week to the next, Ukraine was without a Navy and without an Air Force, destroyed at the outset in late February, early March 2022.

The war was lost by Ukraine before it started.

The interview also  focusses on another strategic issue, which has not been addressed by military analysts. 

There are unspoken divisions with NATO. Turkey is both a “NATO Heavyweight” as well as  a firm ally of the Russia Federation. 

You cannot win a war against Russia when the second largest military power member state of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is “sleeping with the enemy”. 

A fractured NATO cannot under any circumstances wage war on Russia when its military heavyweight on the Southern coastline of the Black Sea is “Sleeping with the Enemy”, i.e. collaborating with Moscow coupled with a close personal relationship between Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Vladimir Putin. 

What this means is that under present conditions a US-NATO war against Russia is an impossibility.  

***

click link or image below to access , once you access, click the lower right hand corner to access full screen

Source

Tavistock Et Al, Black Cars, Torn Jeans and LGBTQ: Social Engineering, Mind Manipulation

Tavistock Et Al, Black Cars, Torn Jeans and LGBTQ: Social Engineering, Mind Manipulation

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

Black is beautiful. Blackness is goodness.

Have you ever noticed that most of the cars you see on city streets and highways are black? Some are white and shades of grey and silver in between? They represent about 90% or more of all car colors in the US and in Europe. You may find slightly more red, blue and yellow cars in Latin America, Asia and in Africa. But the trend is universal.

This is for a purpose. You are being primed to think in black and white and ultimately mostly in black, as white is gradually disappearing. An entire generation knows nothing else but “cars are black and white”. The proportion of black is overwhelming. And with limited choices and constantly being exposed to these limited same-same colors, people start thinking and liking black and white.

This has been going on for the last 20 to 30 years. And not only with car colors. Black has become a very popular fashion color. Household equipment comes in black. White and grey in between is gradually fading out. That’s a planned “coincidence”. At the beginning you had a choice between black, white and shades in between. Now the funnel is gradually closing in on black.

You have entire restaurants in black, apartments furnished in black. Radio, stereo, TV – sound equipment, all in black. There are black housefronts, black painted patios, black carpets and rugs. And more and more people dress in black.

Black is chic. Black is beautiful. Ever more so than white. Never mind that white is the divine color. It’s discarded. Outranked by black. Divine versus diabolical. The latter is gaining the upper hand.

Your mind is being directed to love black. Dark vibrations emanate from black. Sadness, despair, depressions are represented by darkness, blackness. Black inspires fear. Black is the antidote to joy. Black lowers your defenses, makes us vulnerable to negative vibes. Black is doomsday-ish. Black lowers our defenses. Black is a planned mindset of apocalyptic think. Black primes us for fear and submission, without we noticing.

There are even black beds. Imagine! You are sleeping in the darkness on a pedestal of underworld vibrations. How does that subtly influence your state of mind?  It’s part of a larger plan. A long-term plan; has been going on for at least two to three decades.

Black becomes integrated into our hearts and souls. We are to become a reflection of blackness. Black becomes you, and you become black. You become an integrated oneness with black. Thinking black, you cannot escape. It’s a Luciferan Cult, a cult of death.

The Tavistock Institute

Blackness and the belief in its goodness form the basis for much more to come – an open mind for societal manipulation.

Welcome to Tavistock: to the Tavistock Institute for Social Engineering of the Masses. It is based in Sussex, England, and describes itself as “a nonprofit charity that applies social sciences to contemporary issues and problems.” In reality, it applies highly sophisticated psycho-social sciences to numb and channel our minds.

The Tavistock Institute has a wide reach, working together with many US think tanks and social research institutes, including the Pentagon based semi-secret DARPA – Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency which serves as the central research and development organization of the Department of Defense. One of its sinister objectives is mind manipulation of individuals and collaborating with Tavistock on geoengineering populations at large.

We must be aware that our thoughts and think-process is ever more controlled, manipulated – loaded with fear to make us submissive. To learn more about Tavistock, see Tavistock Institute – Social Engineering of the Masses, by Daniel Estulin – available from Amazon and other internet bookstores:

“The Tavistock Institute, in Sussex, England, describes itself as a nonprofit charity that applies social science to contemporary issues and problems.

But this book by Daniel Estulin posits that it is the world’s center for mass brainwashing and social engineering activities. It grew from a somewhat crude beginning at Wellington House into a sophisticated organization that was to shape the destiny of the entire planet, and in the process, change the paradigm of modern society.” (Amazon)

Focusing on just a few “phenomena”, false truths, demonstrates how large segments of populations and entire societies are being manipulated. The main instruments for mass manipulation are always fear, followed by submission.

Fearful people submit much easier to authority than those with self-esteem and recognition of self-worth.*

Fashion and torn jeans

In case, you sometimes wonder why people may have a tendency to wear torn jeans, sometimes so miserably torn, they are lucky to hang on to the wearer’s legs. It looks ridiculous, but it’s in. Its fashion of the commons, of the masses. It’s again Orwell’s dystopian “ugly is beautiful and beautiful is ugly.”

Again, mind and mass manipulation – Tavistock and Co. – at their best. The same purpose as the beauty of blackness is behind training people towards what you may call “same-think”; another form of matrix thinking, promoting the blue-pill doctrine.

You may wonder, how can grown-up and well-educated people in unison love black and wear torn-jeans. It’s the promotion of the tramp-look, the NYC homeless-look. It’s hype and prevents you from thinking what’s going on in politics and why.

Pineal gland

All the while, your mind is being numbed with chemicals in the air and in the water. Fluoride, for example, in the water and in toothpaste is sold to you as protecting children’s teeth from cavities. In reality, it is one of the chemicals that numb your pineal gland, particularly important for children as the pineal gland develops human’s sensibility, sense for wrong and right, sense for ethics. See this.

Highly sophisticated science is behind it all. You wouldn’t guess, but the purpose of this long-term thinking and planning is to bring about a generation that has been funneled into a dystopian “system-think” mode. George Orwell’s foresight was brilliant. And it is being applied to the latter by the cabal.

Image on the right is from Hank Grebe / Getty Images

Pineal Gland: Anatomy, Location, and Function

Simultaneously with 24/7 nonstop intensive propaganda for whatever aberration is at the forefront, they – the “financial cabal: – have tools for killing the pineal gland. That’s the gland at the center of your brain (see picture on the right – origin “google”). The pineal gland regulates the perception of light – darkness, by creating N-acetylserotonin and melatonin. Melatonin has many therapeutic roles and is heavily implicated in the regulation of the sleep-wake cycle.

As such, the pineal gland is key for human sensitivity and senses. When the pineal gland is severely weakened, mind manipulation is even easier, as natural senses and sensibilities are neutralized.

It’s all part of a sophisticated long-term plan. And all of the strategic mechanisms are connected. Nothing is coincidence.

Another tool for mass manipulation with multiple effects, is the release of thousands of tiny chemical molecules and heavy metal particles (they are covered by hundreds if not thousands of patents) by airplanes into what is called chemtrails which, on the one hand are a key instrument for climate geoengineering, the man-made “climate change” (see below), and on the other, for weakening humans’ sensibility, to prime us, We, the People, for mass-manipulation.

COVID

Once people are tuned-in or primed for propaganda, they’ll react to everything they are told.

To make sure they do, though, there is this crucial element of “fear” added to the propaganda.

It works like medicine. First fear, then warning – then whatever hammer slams down on people’s freedom, is for “our own good”. – and it works.

Fear is THE instrument for mind control and societal geoengineering.

The false covid crisis is a recent mass “engineering” of opinions, actually of creating a “public opinion”. The fraud should have been clear from the outset. It was to a few but most didn’t realize what was happening. Sophisticated psychosocial science was applied. People were shocked with tyranny-type dictates of obligatory mask wearing, social distancing and lockdowns. They condemned the non-believers and created a chasm between the sheep and the snakes.

That too is part of the manipulation: dividing to govern. An axiom as old as human history.

Fear worked and still works. Now that the mask mandate is off across the globe, millions of people still wear the ugly face cover that makes of individuals anonymous nobodies.

Compliment of Tavistock and Co., and their influence around the world of perfected social science keeping people on their knees, obeying with fear of catching a deadly disease if they were infected. To make it all believable, the mass dying of covid was tricked by delaying normal burials of everyday from all-causes diseased people. Coffins accumulated. In some cases, in the streets – to cause fear and obedience.

If only we – the vast majority of the people – had eyes to see and ears to hear and a brain to think and seek out reason – we would have noticed that the perpetrators gave us many signals of their lies and of what was to come. But he geoengineering of the masses was done well.

When waking up finally started, it was too late. Even now, after two years of intense vaxx campaigns – see below – after injecting some 70% of the western population, in the Global North, the light has not yet penetrated every mind.

Event 201

On October 18, 2019, in New York City, Event 201 took place. A desktop simulation of precisely what was going to happen less than three months later, a corona virus outbreak. The event was sponsored by the visible villains of those appearing to command the world, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum (WEF), and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It had broad participation of all villains, who would have a future key role in cracking down on humanity, the World Bank, IMF, WHO, the entire UN system – and many more.

With the midnight gong of the beginning of the decade 2020-2030 (UN Agenda 2030), covid descended on all 193 UN member countries (194 WHO members).

All at once. Had people used their brains, just a tiny corner of their brains, they would have realized that it is impossible for a virus to hit the entire planet at once, meaning at once – the same day, the same hour. Common sense and sensibility had been killed along with the pineal gland, gradually and gently during decades before. So, the clever perpetrators got away with it, as planned.

On March 11, 2020, Dr. Tedros, Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO) declared covid a “pandemic” with only about 118,000 cumulative cases (PCR test) worldwide including China (the figure has never been questioned and checked) and some 4,200 deaths (including China). Nobody checked those figures either.

The number of confirmed cases outside China (6.4 billion population) was of the order of 44,279 and 1,440 deaths (figures recorded by the WHO for March 11 and March 12)

No evidence of a pandemic on March 11, 2020

Did people not notice that this was a fraud of global proportions?

Fear must have kept us down. Fear from contracting the disease (morbidly and mortality) that is – and second, fear from the authorities.

Just compare the covid data (even if it’s false, which it probably is) with the common flu claiming every year between 50 and 70 million cases in the US alone – covid (never really identified as a virus), is a flu-like affliction, with a mortality rate about the same as the flu, of 0.07%. The flue has never been declared a pandemic. Open eyes and open ears should have detected the fraud. Most didn’t. They fell in with the masses – in lockstep.

Fear, submission, repression

Social engineering and mind manipulation is what the world – all 193 UN member states (194 for WHO) has been exposed to over the past at least 100 years, with one finality – to control humanity, Mother Earths resources and to decide over who lives and who dies. “Death Cult” institutions, WHO, WEF, the entire UN system – are the instruments to carry out this diabolical plan on behalf of an occult elite.

It is All Connected 

And be always aware – it is all connected. Presenting each event in the media as a neural individual “problem”, or crisis, separately, so that people do not make the connection. If they do, they will understand.

Around mid-March 2020, a lockdown was ordered in lockstep – by almost all countries of the world. In the west it was police and even military enforced.

Many African countries took it less seriously. They questioned the wisdom of this regimented worldwide “lockstep-lockdown” regime. Governments worldwide had been “primed” before. So, We, the People, should have noticed that all of this is a scam, and that our leaders (sic) are all traitors.

Governments – their leaders – remain traitors of the people they are supposed to to serve. They are traitors up to this very day. Take note.

Tavistock and Co know that, but they also know that people are generally beholden to their governments, that they would never suspect that they are cheated by their governments – actually in many cases driven to their death by their government. It’s hard to admit to oneself that your government is betraying you – so, many people fall into the “Stockholm syndrome”, hanging on to their governments in full trust.

“Vaxxing“

In mid-December 2020 they said they finally had a “vaccination” ready – and intense worldwide vaxx-campaigns started in 2021 – à la “no human is left behind, unvaxxed” – all must go through this horrendous tyrannical experiment of gene-modifying mRNA injections, sold as vaccinations. Which now even Pfizer and Co — and the “regulators” CDC, and the chief criminal in this affair, Dr. Fauci, now admit.

Yet, the admittance doesn’t stop the vaxx-bulldozer from rolling on. Because Tavistock and DARPA and Co. fuel the bulldozer’s rolling over all evidence of fraud. The bought media, of course, play along.

In fact, the vaxxes, now admitted, were only “experimental”, in as much as the manufacturers, who by the way never disclosed the contents of the vaxx-vial, was testing their reaction on humans. There were many versions of the “vaxxes” circulating, original, then first, second, third and even fourth “boosters”. The manufacturers, Pfizer, Moderna, J&J et al – wanted to know which concoctions were the deadliest.

Because part of the plans for the UN Agenda 2030, and in parallel, for Klaus Schwab’s (WEF) The Great Reset, is a massive culling of the population, of those useless eaters – as Schwab and his close Israeli adviser Harari calls us, The People. It is clearly a eugenist agenda.

By now, three years into this crime of biblical proportions, we know that millions, if not hundreds of millions of people have already perished or were maimed for life by the vaxxes. Far-far out-pacing the so-called covid-deaths, of which there is not even proof that they exist.

Why not?

Because worldwide statistics of deaths from all causes showed no excess deaths until the end of 2020, when supposedly covid was ravaging the globe.

However, excess deaths started showing in 2021 and 2022, when coerced vaxxination escalated and the vaxx-impact was registered. But, of course not covered by the mainstream media.

In the west, mostly Europe, global Anglosaxonia and Japan, excess deaths were reported as between 15% and 25% in some countries even higher. And we are only at the beginning. As Dr. Mike Yeadon, former VP and Chief Science Officer of Pfizer, warned on many occasions, the real impact (death) of the vaxxes may only be registered several years down the road, when it will be difficult to trace deaths back to the vaxxes.

Other than the potentially deadly mRNA and spike protein, plus in many cases graphene oxide (high degree of magnetism) characteristic, the vaxxes and every booster, reduces the natural human immune system (Dr. Yeadon). Depending on the number of boosters, the vaxxed could lose up to 70% to 80% of their natural immunity. Thereby becoming vulnerable to all kinds of diseases, including aggressive and deadly cancers – cancers that are affecting mostly the human reproductive system.

In addition – also hardly mentioned – but flagrantly reflected by country statistics, the vaxxes sterilize women, as well as men. Fertility rates clearly declined drastically. In some countries life-child births went down by up to 40%.

According to the WEF, due to the plandemic, fertility has drastically decreased. Nice way of saying “we have done so, with our covid vaxxes”. See this.

The non-vaxxed were segregated. They were not allowed in restaurants, theatres and other public places. – A discrimination that clearly works against the Soros-funded Woke agenda, also a Tavistock-WEF concept, the “Wokeness” of society – see below.

Instilled socio-engineered fear, makes vaxxed people keeping the unvaxxed from entering a restaurant. No police are needed. A clever strategy. These days are over. But they could reappear tomorrow, under another pretext, say the introduction of a vaxx certificate, that you refuse.

“Woke”

You may have guessed it, “Woke” is another parallel flank of the Tavistock et al agenda – it’s part of the tools to bring about a new world order (NOW) by 2030. In about 2017 the term “woke” has been infiltrated into the mainstream vocabulary. Woke is part of the social engineering and mind manipulation process.

What does “woke” really mean? In many ways it’s an enigma. People have different definitions. They include, no discrimination, equal treatment of all races, acceptance of all gender differences and preferences.

The Webster defines woke as “chiefly US slang”, meaning, “Aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues (especially issues of racial and social justice).”

To be precise: Woke (/ˈwoʊk/ WOHK) is an adjective derived from African-American Vernacular English (AAVE) meaning “alert to racial prejudice and discrimination”.

This opens woke up to a wide range of interpretations. Not by coincidence, of course. That’s wat the manipulators want – create confusion, deviation of thoughts, bringing all together as a “oneness”, yet being divided about the term ‘s meaning. Divide to rule, while deviating from the real issue.

“Woke” is everything. A perfect tool for societal engineering.

Remember, mind-manipulated people will be gullible to stories of fear, lies, eventually obeying senseless but dictatorial orders – “if you don’t behave, you are “un-woke” and that’s a punishable crime.

Tavistock – there are so many things we have to obey to – how would we know what’s true and what’s fake? – We don’t.

And we cannot think. As we have been trained for black-and-white only. We tend to obey. There is hardly any room for colors, for deviation of thought, especially when the dictate comes top-down.

Here is an interesting clip about the Woke culture, by Konstantin Kisin – 11-min video clip, “This House Believes Woke Culture Has Gone Too Far” – 7/8 – Oxford Union.


LGBTQIAP+

This unpronounceable acronym stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex, asexual/aromantic, pansexual communities. The plus sign represents other not-yet invented queer identities, hence not yet included in the acronym. It feeds right into the woke-culture of non-discrimination.

Interestingly, the Woke / LGBTQIAP+ concept does precisely that. It discriminates, while pretending it fights discrimination. (White) teachers and parents are told to teach children not to discriminate guys, lesbians and trans-people, and not to discriminate black and colored people. But the sheer fact that you separate the “sexually normal” from the sexually “special” – and distinguish between skin colors, is discrimination – it’s against the very Woke-Culture. “Woke” would be respect everybody the same.

It’s again the Orwell dystopia of “war is peace and peace is war.”

Why not teaching children, as well as adults to respect all sexual orientations and all skin colors. Period.

As to the highly promoted sexual reorientation campaign – gays, lesbian and trans – won’t have children. See, Tavistock and Co work for the depopulation agenda.

Can you imagine how far this goes – there are schools in Europe that allow children age 11 / 12 to decide about their sexual orientation, i.e., medical intervention, if necessary – without their parents consent. That’s social manipulation at its worst. Potentially destroying young lives, making kids believe they may have another sexual orientation than the one they are born with – propaganda is everything.

The Climate Change Farce

Climate changes all the time. Everything that lives on Mother Earth, is in constant motion. The term “climate change”, preceded by “Global Warming” – which with rapidly shifting temperatures, was perceived not so reliable. Then the Cultists came up with the more flexible “universal term” of ”climate change”. It fits all shades of weather.

The idea itself was invented already by the Club of Rome in 1971, which was created by a non-European, David Rockefeller.  The Club has around 100 active full members with an eleven-member Executive Board, including Henry Kissinger, George Soros, Bill Gates, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands and more such luminaries.

Anybody who thinks the Club of Rome, founded on the principles of an NGO, has anything to do with Rome – is dead-wrong. The CoR is headquartered in Winterthur, Switzerland, in the paradise for some of the world’s shadiest organizations.

Among the objectives of the CoR, as reflected by their 1972 issued infamous book “Limits of Growth”, is the pursuit of means to oppress, control and reduce humanity.

Their “Limits of Growth” is as of this day the blueprint for the tyranny that we are living since the beginning of the UN Agenda 2030. And more is to come.

The sloganization of climate change and its dire doomsday consequences for humanity is part of the ongoing mind-trickery.

We are talking about man-made climate change – made by CO2 emissions that are slowly but steadily killing the planet. Never mind that without CO2 there would be no life on earth. As carbon is used by plants to generate oxygen, the life gas for all humans and sentient beings.

So climate change too is an absolute propagandized lie. An entire generation more has been brought up with the guilt, being responsible for killing the planet because the energy we consume, hydrocarbons, emit CO2 that kills the planet. A lie of mammoth proportions.

The only man-made climate change that indeed is changing weather patterns, is geoengineering the weather – in other words, its weaponizing the weather. The deadly monsoon in Pakistan in July, August and parts of September 2022, was with high probability geoengineered, for political reasons.

It was to deviate people’s attention from wanting to bring back THEIR, people-elected President, Imran Khan, who was ousted by a US instigated internal coup, “vote of non-confidence”, as Mr. Khan was not dancing to the tunes of Washington, but had the interests of the Pakistani people at hand.

Similar with last summer’s extreme heat wave in Europe and North America, as well as the extreme cold hitting the Northeast of the US and parts of Europe – are the results of man-made weather interference. They kill in more ways than one, by wiping out harvests, floods destroying vital infrastructure – prompting the infamous death cycle – famine, poverty, disease, death

Who controls the weather or climate, control the people.

“Democracy”

The term “democracy” is for the last 30 years or so in everybody’s vocabulary. It’s mostly used as a no-holds barred expression. In other words, who wants to contradict Democracy? – We live under the illusion to live in a democracy. When you hear “democracy” – your mind is curling up – “Oh yes, we live in a democracy” implying not like Russia and China – which are presumed dictatorships.

Democracy is one of the most misused household words in modern history, especially in the west. It’s a make-believe term.

Have we ever had a democracy?

Nope. Never. Not even the Ancient Greeks some 2500 years ago, who supposedly invented democracy- were true democratic societies. Not all were equal. Only educated people were able to vote. The “educated” were pretty much the same as today – the elite, the wealthy, the “influencers”.

But hardly the common people.

Since the “common people” do often not grasp the subtleties of politics, they constantly and consistently being told what to think, translating into what or for whom to vote.

That’s not democracy, but rather mass-manipulating the minds. But it’s sold to us as “democracy” – something we never had.

A new society may be formed on democratic principles, the basis for which is a well-educated – a truth-educated – population.

When we feel there is no way to escape, when we are hanging in the balance, between choosing to do nothing and waiting it out – and taking the risk to resist, it is only a question of our, We the People’s, mindset to escape from tyranny and start afresh.

We must take the risk, to salvage humanity and ourselves from the ongoing dystopian destruction.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he worked for over 30 years around the world. He lectures at universities in the US, Europe and South America. He writes regularly for online journals and is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed; and co-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – November 1, 2020).

Peter is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is also is a non-resident Senior Fellow of the Chongyang Institute of Renmin University, Beijing. 

Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)