Eagle’s Eye Report: Media Trust Implosion

Eagle’s Eye Report: Media Trust Implosion


Eagle’s Eye Report: Media Trust Implosion (Archived)

Host: Roger Landry (TLB) – Co-Host & Producer: Stephen Roberts

Brought to you by: TLBTalk.com – Where Freedom Roars

Live Broadcast platform: ShakeAndWake Radio Network

Listen to Archived show below intro article

Intro by: Roger Landry (TLB)

Welcome to Episode #3 of the Eagle’s Eye Report. Hosted by myself, Roger Landry (TLB), and Co-Hosted and Produced by my good friend and fellow patriot – Stephen Roberts. The mission of this show is to be a mechanism for communicating the truth and facts in a country increasingly forbidding of these very concepts.

No, this not a pleasant way to introduce a show … but today reality is blatant and not very pleasant in many aspects. Thus the reason for the Eagle’s Eye Report. This show airs weekly on multiple forums and on several others as an archived show embedded in an article (as we present here).

Our mission (of this show) is to keep you armed with the vital truth, as well as to give you a platform where you can discuss these vital issues without fear of censorship or exclusion, that being the sponsor of this show … TLBTalk.com.

Today we will discuss the state of trust in media … from the Mainstream to the big tech platforms, and their increasingly rapid drop is trust factor beyond even our wildest expectations a mere 2 decades ago. Today trust in Mainstream or Big Tech media is in a free-fall with many polls showing even the most trusted (over generations) media suffering well below a 50% approval rating … why … how?

Today we discuss the weaponization of information via the above mechanisms to program society with ignorance meant to advance a globalist agenda that holds no benefit for We The People. Look around you at the most chaotic period in American, if not Global history and you will not find any comparison … even in times of past world wars.

All of this hearkens to the very reason for the creation and the proliferation of the TLBTalk.com, a platform launched to give you not only a place to learn … but also to teach. A Platform designed to guarantee you the freedom to speak your mind … but if your message is false or built on lies … it does not guarantee you an audience. All considered, such as the total lack of any government or corporate influence, this platform will only be what you and its membership are willing to make it. Consider this an experiment in just how bad we wish the right to freely exercise our First Amendment … and we will carry on from there.

Show Talking Points

  • Why did TLB Project bother to set up a social media platform like TLBTalk.com
  • Why no Corporate investment, funding or advertisements.
  • When did the trust in Mainstream Media start to die in earnest
  • CIA Money … Government Money … Big Pharma Money … Big Corporate Money
  • Globalist agenda … Corporate Alignment

  • Government consider via section 230
  • Programmed Ignorance … What you see, is all there is
  • Shadow Banning
  • Fact Checkers
  • Hunter Biden laptop
  • 2020 election lies …Trump Russian Collusion
  • The reason and need for TLBTalk …

Listen up …

••••

Eagle’s Eye Report: Media Trust Implosion (Archived)

(Click on image below to listen)

••••

RELATED:

Eagle’s Eye Report: Premier Show

(The need for this show – Archived)

(Click on image below to listen)

••••

About the Articles Author Roger Landry (TLB) spent about three decades of his adult life either in, or working for the military, with about two decades working directly for the Military Industrial Complex facilitating DOD contracts. His awakening to Political, Economic, and Health realities was about twelve short years ago. Since that time he has founded The Liberty Beacon Project (TLB) consisting of a half dozen proprietary global websites, media projects and partner websites across the planet. He contributes regularly to multiple forums both in and outside of TLB Project. Most of his work can be found on the TLB Flagship website TheLibertyBeacon.com

••••

Click on the image below to visit/join our sponsors site:

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

Dr. Robert Malone Leading 17,000 Scientists Calling for Total End to ‘Orchestrated’ COVID Crisis

Dr. Robert Malone Leading 17,000 Scientists Calling for Total End to ‘Orchestrated’ COVID Crisis

The group of 17,000 medical professionals called for an end to COVID ‘genetic therapy injections,’ the restoration of medical freedom, and accountability for ‘crimes against humanity.’   

A group of 17,000 physicians and medical scientists led by Dr. Robert Malone has issued a declaration affirming that “the [COVID] state of medical emergency must be lifted, scientific integrity restored, and crimes against humanity addressed.”

The website for the Global COVID Summit identifies the group as “the product of an international alliance of doctors and scientists, committed to speaking truth to power about COVID pandemic research and treatment.”

The group presented the declaration in a May 11 press conference, this brief, comprehensive,  and candid statement condemns “the disastrous COVID-19 public health policies” that have resulted from “a corrupt medical alliance of pharmaceutical, insurance, and healthcare institutions, along with the financial trusts which control them.” This alliance has been “protected and supported by a parallel alliance of big tech, media, academics and government agencies who profited from this orchestrated catastrophe.” 

Furthermore, this corrupt alliance has “compromised the integrity of our most prestigious medical societies” creating “an illusion of scientific consensus by substituting truth with propaganda.” It advances “unscientific claims by censoring data and intimidating and firing doctors and scientists for simply publishing actual clinical results or treating their patients with proven, life-saving medicine,” it states. 

The declaration goes on to deplore the “catastrophic” results inflicted upon the health and lives of innocent people due to the withholding of “critical and time-sensitive treatments” and the imposition of “coerced genetic therapy injections, which are neither safe nor effective.” 

The recipients of experimental COVID-19 gene therapy “quasi-vaccines” have also been denied “the fundamental human right” of “true informed consent” as they have been “blocked from obtaining the information necessary to understand risks and benefits of vaccines, and their alternatives,” it declares. 

The medical professionals blamed the enormous damages imposed by forced lockdowns on the “leadership of this alliance” which expressed in the book COVID-19: The Great Reset their clear intention “to leverage COVID-19 as an ‘opportunity’ to reset our entire global society, culture, political structures, and economy.” 

COVID-19: The Great Reset was written and published in 2020 by Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret.

Thus, the Global Summit asserts its mission “to end this orchestrated crisis, which has been illegitimately imposed on the world, and to formally declare that the actions of this corrupt alliance constitute nothing less than crimes against humanity” (emphasis in original). 

Expressing the necessity to restore freedom of speech in their profession, along with patient autonomy and the “sacred doctor-patient relationship,” they report having come to a consensus on ten foundational principles (below) which demand the immediate termination of all states of emergency and vaccine mandates.  

These principles also demand support be provided for patients impacted by vaccine injuries and death and call for COVID vaccine manufacturers to be “immediately indicted for fraud” and other government and medical agencies to be “held accountable” for their actions. 

Expert physicians and medical scientists elaborated on each principle during their hour-long press conference.  

The entire statement follows: 

Declaration IV – Restore Scientific Integrity
A Joint Statement, representing 17,000 Physicians and Medical Scientists to end the National Emergency, Restore Scientific Integrity, and Address Crimes Against Humanity. 

17,000 physicians and medical scientists declare that the state of medical emergency must be lifted, scientific integrity restored, and crimes against humanity addressed. 

We, the physicians and medical scientists of the world, united through our loyalty to the Hippocratic Oath, recognize that the disastrous COVID-19 public health policies imposed on doctors and our patients are the culmination of a corrupt medical alliance of pharmaceutical, insurance, and healthcare institutions, along with the financial trusts which control them. They have infiltrated our medical system at every level and are protected and supported by a parallel alliance of big tech, media, academics and government agencies who profited from this orchestrated catastrophe.  

 This corrupt alliance has compromised the integrity of our most prestigious medical societies to which we belong, generating an illusion of scientific consensus by substituting truth with propaganda. This alliance continues to advance unscientific claims by censoring data and intimidating and firing doctors and scientists for simply publishing actual clinical results or treating their patients with proven, life-saving medicine. These catastrophic decisions came at the expense of the innocent, who are forced to suffer health damage and death caused by intentionally withholding critical and time-sensitive treatments, or as a result of coerced genetic therapy injections, which are neither safe nor effective.  

 The medical community has denied patients the fundamental human right to provide true informed consent for the experimental COVID-19 injections. Our patients are also blocked from obtaining the information necessary to understand risks and benefits of vaccines, and their alternatives, due to widespread censorship and propaganda spread by governments, public health officials and media. Patients continue to be subjected to forced lockdowns which harm their health, careers and children’s education, and damage social and family bonds critical to civil society. This is not a coincidence. In the book entitled “COVID-19: The Great Reset”, leadership of this alliance has clearly stated their intention is to leverage COVID-19 as an “opportunity” to reset our entire global society, culture, political structures, and economy. 

 Our 17,000 Global COVID Summit physicians and medical scientists represent a much larger, enlightened global medical community who refuse to be compromised, and are united and willing to risk the wrath of the corrupt medical alliance to defend the health of their patients. 

 The mission of theGlobal COVID Summit is to end this orchestrated crisis, which has been illegitimately imposed on the world, and to formally declare that the actions of this corrupt alliance constitute nothing less than crimes against humanity.  

 We must restore the people’s trust in medicine, which begins with free and open dialogue between physicians and medical scientists. We must restore medical rights and patient autonomy. This includes the foundational principle of the sacred doctor-patient relationship. The social need for this is decades overdue, and therefore, we the physicians of the world are compelled to take action.  

 After two years of scientific research, millions of patients treated, hundreds of clinical trials performed and scientific data shared, we have demonstrated and documented our success in understanding and combating COVID-19. In considering the risks versus benefits of major policy decisions, our Global COVID Summit of 17,000 physicians and medical scientists from all over the world have reached consensus on the following foundational principles: 

  1. We declare and the data confirm that the COVID-19 experimental genetic therapy injections must end. 
  2. We declare doctors should not be blocked from providing life-saving medical treatment. 
  3. We declare the state of national emergency, which facilitates corruption and extends the pandemic, should be immediately terminated. 
  4. We declare medical privacy should never again be violated, and all travel and social restrictions must cease. 
  5. We declare masks are not and have never been effective protection against an airborne respiratory virus in the community setting. 
  6. We declare funding and research must be established for vaccination damage, death and suffering. 
  7. We declare no opportunity should be denied, including education, career, military service or medical treatment, over unwillingness to take an injection. 
  8. We declare that first amendment violations and medical censorship by government, technology and media companies should cease, and the Bill of Rights be upheld. 
  9. We declare that Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech, Janssen, Astra Zeneca, and their enablers, withheld and willfully omitted safety and effectiveness information from patients and physicians, and should be immediately indicted for fraud. 
  10. We declare government and medical agencies must be held accountable. 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/dr-robert-malone-leads-thousands-of-scientists-in-calling-for-a-total-end-to-orchestrated-covid-crisis/

Source

Biden Is Trying To Control (Dis)Information

Biden Is Trying To Control (Dis)Information


Biden Tries Controlling (Dis)Information

By: Sloan Oliver

The goal of tyrants, dictators, and oppressive governments is to gain power and then stay in power. They largely do this by controlling information — the information available and who has access to it. Information is power, and tyrants use information to gain power. So, for a king or dictator etc. to gain power and stay in control, they tried to monopolize information. Throughout most of history, that was an easy task because there were few books and few people could read. There was no radio, TV, internet, or libraries. For the vast majority, the Bible, Quran, etc. was the single source of information. If it wasn’t in the Bible, you didn’t need to know it. The king, caliph, etc. would tell you what you needed to know, and that was it.

That changed with the rise of modern society. Education and increased literacy, printing of books, radio, TV, and the internet provided information to billions of people. However, tyrants and oppressive regimes still managed to control the information available to their citizens. State-sponsored media in countries like the Soviet Union, North Korea, China, Turkey, and Iran insured the people heard only what the government allowed. All other information was labeled “disinformation” and was banned. Facts that made the government look bad were banned as dangerous misinformation, were not allowed to be disseminated, and became a crime to share.

An example of “facts are a crime” is the Armenian (and Christian) massacre by Turkey during WW I. Over 1 million were killed in that genocide. Yet, in Turkey, it’s a crime to teach that Armenians were massacred. The fact that genocide occurred is suppressed, ignored, and criminalized to the point where most Turks have never heard of it; or, if they have, they call it disinformation. Same thing in North Korea, a country totally cut off from the outside world such that the people only know what their government tells them. The old Soviet Union’s leading paper was called Pravda. The Soviets told Pravda exactly what to publish — disinformation (lies) that was positive toward communism and misinformation (more lies) about the United States and the West, all to keep the people ignorant of the truth.

Americans are smug about the information we receive, knowing that our information isn’t censored. How naïve, how quaint, how 20th century! Reminds me of a comment from a Chinese citizen when he asked, “You Americans actually believe your media?” Excellent observation in question form. He couldn’t understand how Americans, seemingly intelligent, would still believe our media or government. If someone lies to you time and time again (i.e. Joe Biden), and you know they’re lying; how or why would you continue to believe that person or that source of information?

Leftists in America have long been enthralled with communists, tyrants, and dictators; largely because those regimes control information, and thus control the people. The NY Times ran praise pieces of the Soviet Union under Stalin by “journalists” held spellbound by communism. Bernie Sanders loved communism so much that he honeymooned (1988) in the Soviet Union. Obama had a Chairman Mao Christmas ornament on the White House tree. Don’t forget when Obama praised Cuba in his 2016 visit to that communist nation. When Venezuela descended into a Marxist hellhole of poverty and corruption,American Leftists adored Hugo Chavez. So, it’s no surprise that Biden (and his Democrat regime) would emulate communists and control information with his newly formed Disinformation Governance Board (DGB), headed by Nina Jankowicz, under the Department of Homeland Security.

The DGB is as Orwellian as it sounds. It will attempt to eliminate “disinformation” by censoring and silencing opposing viewpoints, by labelling them as misinformation. Jankowicz is absolutely perfect for the position. In Oct 2020, the NY Post ran a devastating factual article about Hunter Biden’s laptop with emails that directly linked the Biden family (including Joe) to corruption in Ukraine and China. Well, Jankowicz tagged the article as “disinformation” while it was censored by Twitter, Facebook, the NY Times, and all other media. A 100% accurate and true story about Biden’s corruption was completely silenced, only weeks before the election. The only lie, the only misinformation was supplied by the establishment media when they lied about the true story. Now, Biden and the Dems have formalized the process of silencing information they don’t like by calling it “disinformation,” which means it can be censored and eliminated. After all, your government knows better than you what is accurate or not. Biden’s leftist agenda will be advanced because it’s truthful and accurate which, by definition, means that any opposition is not truthful and will be silenced. See how that works?

Let’s use an example. When Anthony Fauci said that masks didn’t prevent the spread of COVID and shouldn’t be worn; if the DGB had been in existence, it would have silenced and censored all other points of view as disinformation. Then, weeks later, when Fauci said we must wear masks to prevent the spread of COVID, the DGB would immediately go to work to ensure the new “masks must be worn” narrative as the only information allowed. Another example, you think there’s a crisis at the border with thousands of illegals entering every day. Wrong. Biden says there is no crisis; the border is under control which means his message is allowed on Twitter while yours is censored and silenced as disinformation. To continue with disinformation that must be silenced, gas is at record high prices due to Biden’s policies and war on petroleum. Biden claims spiking gas prices are due to Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Biden’s claim is a lie but the DGB will censor and silence voices that oppose his narrative by labelling opposition as disinformation. The DGB will ensure the Democrat, Leftist, Biden narrative is advanced. Other viewpoints will be silenced.

Of course, the DGB is un-American; of course, it’s anti-1st Amendment; of course, it’s illegal. What are you going to do about it? Complain to Joe Biden? Call Senator Raphael Warnock, Senator Jon Ossoff, Rep. Sanford Bishop, or Stacey Abrams? Seriously? They agree with Biden 100% of the time. What about Merrick Garland, the attorney general? The DGB could only be formed with his approval. If there’s a single Democrat who disapproves of the Disinformation Governance Board, at any level of government, in the media, or in Hollywood they are completely silent. They have censored themselves, which is exactly what the Dems want — to control information so they can stay in power.

••••

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

Exclusive — House Republicans Demand Answers About Biden’s ‘Disinformation Governance Board’

Exclusive — House Republicans Demand Answers About Biden’s ‘Disinformation Governance Board’

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) is leading an inquiry into whether President Joe Biden’s “Disinformation Governance Board” is pressuring big tech companies to increase their surveillance and censorship of conservative users, according to a letter exclusively obtained by Breitbart News.

In a letter sent to the CEOs of Meta (Facebook), LinkedIn, TikTok, Twitter, Youtube, Snapchat, and Reddit, McMorris Rodgers asks whether Biden’s “disinformation” board has requested information about the companies’ political speech policies and if they would comply with any requests to remove political speech.

The letter comes days after the attorneys general for Louisiana and Missouri sued the Biden administration for colluding with big tech to censor conservative political speech under the guise of combatting “misinformation.”

The House Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member suspects Biden will use the disinformation board to increase the targeting of conservatives online.

“We fully expect this will mean DHS will seek information from your company about conservative users, since President Biden has essentially identified them as political enemies,” she wrote.

McMorris Rodgers called out the board’s director, Nina Jankowicz, for spreading disinformation herself, pointing toward her comments about Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover and her promotion of the infamous Steele dossier.

The letter said:

In response to Elon Musk’s bid to buy Twitter, Jankowicz stated: “I shudder to think about if free speech absolutists were taking over more platforms, what that would look like for marginalized communities…which are already shouldering…disproportionate amounts of this abuse.

Ms. Jankowicz promoted the work of Christopher Steele, the author of one of the most infamous “disinformation” political operations in U.S. history and dismissed Hunter Biden’s laptop as “a Trump campaign product.”

“Although all Americans should be concerned by this new board, sadly, no one should be surprised,” McMorris Rodgers wrote. “President Biden has weaponized his administration to silence certain individuals and censor certain speech since day one of his presidency.”

The letter cited multiple instances of Biden’s White House pressuring private companies to increase their censorship of conservative political speech. For example, McMorris Rodgers drew attention to White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki begging Spotify to do “more” to censor podcast host Joe Rogan after she disapproved of remarks made about coronavirus by one of Rogan’s guests.

McMorris Rodgers also pointed to Biden’s comments about the MAGA movement being “the most extreme political organization” in history as an example of Biden’s chilling effect on free speech.

“Notably, the Biden administration has a history of pressuring your company to censor certain speech and silence individuals, and we are concerned the creation of this board will result in an increase in such efforts,” McMorris Rodgers said.

In addition to Morris, the letter was signed by Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-FL) and Rep. Robert Latta (R-OH).

Source

Elon Musk Can Use The First Amendment To Make Twitter Open To Free Speech Again

Elon Musk Can Use The First Amendment To Make Twitter Open To Free Speech Again

Edit buttons, open-source algorithms, long-form tweets, and stopping scam bots are just some of the modifications Elon Musk suggested he would implement in the run-up to his successful bid to buy Twitter. All of those sound like interesting ideas.

But none of them will directly improve the prospects for free and open dialogue on the platform, which appear to be Musk’s overarching reason for buying the company. As he has rightly said, “Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated.”

Musk also recently tweeted, “By ‘free speech,’ I simply mean that which matches the law. I am against censorship that goes far beyond the law.” He is on the right track. Twitter should do what “matches the law” by modeling its policies after First Amendment standards.

Musk’s commitment is a breath of fresh air for those who value free speech. He seems to comprehend that free speech is essential to preserving a free society, and that social media has replaced the physical town square as the primary place for debate and expression.

So how should Musk practically implement his promise to improve free speech on Twitter? He should revise the platform’s policies based on the lessons of First Amendment case law — the world’s richest repository of practical wisdom on protecting free speech.

As a private company, Twitter is not legally obligated to follow the Constitution as a government actor would be. Nevertheless, the First Amendment’s legal protections are valuable guidelines for how private actors can help create a culture of free speech.

Here are two actions he can take that will directly improve the prospects for free and open debate and dialogue on the platform: One, eliminate private “speech codes” — policies that contain vague and imprecise terms that threaten free speech. Two, adopt a robust anti-censorship policy.

Step One: Eliminate Private Speech Codes

What are speech codes? They are rules that control the content of what people can or can’t say. In addition, these regulations commonly contain unclear and imprecise terms that give enforcement officials unbridled discretion to censor speech they don’t like.

In the First Amendment context, courts routinely strike down government speech codes because of the plain threat they pose to free speech. Unfortunately, these types of policies now proliferate on private social media platforms, including Twitter, and significantly contribute to the censorship problem in the digital public square.

Musk can spot speech codes by looking for vague or imprecise language — two tell-tale signs of looming censorship. One basic guideline on how to spot these problematic terms is to look for vague terms.

A term is vague if it (1) forces an individual of ordinary intelligence to guess at what it means, or (2) invites arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement due to a grant of unfettered discretion or lack of objective standards. Terms that lack clarity and grant broad discretionary powers to those in control threaten free speech because officials can use them to suppress whichever viewpoint they disfavor.

Another thing to look for is imprecise terms: A term is imprecise if it fails to narrowly target the specific harmful activity it is designed to prohibit. Imprecise terms imperil free speech because they reach beyond the harmful activity they purport to target and instead censor and chill speech.

Unclear Terms Allow Censorship

“Hate speech,” “hateful conduct,” “misinformation,” and “disinformation” are some of the most common terms in speech codes. They are also notoriously unclear and imprecise. Twitter has numerous policies containing these terms. Each of these terms is a threat to free speech because they can be wielded to silence any viewpoints those in authority choose.

Take, for example, how these policies affect the free exchange of ideas on the ongoing national debate over gender ideology and its effects on female athletics, privacy, religious freedom, and free speech. This issue is, borrowing from Musk’s words, a “matter vital to the future of humanity.” Yet time and again, Twitter’s policies have hampered the freedom of people to freely discuss this critical issue.

Specifically, Twitter has wielded its “hateful conduct” policy to censor or deplatform users on one side of this debate. Among other things, that policy says, “You may not promote violence against or directly attack or threaten other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, caste, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.” It also bars “targeted misgendering or deadnaming of transgender individuals.”

Prohibiting “hateful conduct” or “targeted harassment” is a noble objective. But, as applied to speech, Twitter’s speech code allows for disproportionate application and censorship. And that’s exactly what has happened.

Just Look at Twitter’s Recent History

For example, in late January 2021, Twitter locked out The Daily Citizen, a Christian news outlet, from its account for stating that one of President Joe Biden’s nominees is a man who identifies as a woman. The full tweet said: “On Tuesday, President-elect Joe Biden announced that he had chosen Dr. Rachel Levine to serve as Assistant Secretary for Health at the Department of HHS. Dr. Levine is a transgender woman, that is, a man who believes he is a woman.”

The tweet linked to an article on The Daily Citizen’s website. This tweet addressed a matter of dramatic importance — whether identifying as a woman is what makes a person a woman — and expressed the position that many reasonable people hold: that identity is not the only thing that makes someone a man or a woman.

The tweet neither expressed any hatred nor encouraged any violence toward Levine. Nevertheless, Twitter informed The Daily Citizen that the tweet violated its “hateful conduct” policy because it “promoted violence, threatened, or harassed” Levine. Twitter denied The Daily Citizen’s appeal and imposed a four-month ban.

Similarly, The Federalist’s Senior Editor John Daniel Davidson was locked out of his Twitter account for saying Levine was a man. Twitter refuses to unlock Davidson’s account unless he deletes the offending tweet, a common practice Twitter applies disproportionately to conservative commentators.

Bans on Transgender Discussion

Similarly, during the 2021 summer Olympics, Twitter banned several commentators for questioning Olympic rules that permit males to compete in women’s categories. For example, when New Zealand transgender weightlifter Laurel Hubbard exited the competition after failing all three attempts, Allie Beth Stuckey tweeted that “Laura [sic] Hubbard failing at the event doesn’t make his inclusion fair. He’s still a man, and men shouldn’t compete against women in weightlifting.”

In response to Stuckey’s 12-hour ban, Erick Erickson tweeted, “This is absurd. Laurel Hubbard is a man even if Twitter doesn’t like it.” He also received a 12-hour ban. Both times, Twitter invoked its “hateful conduct” policy.

More recently, Twitter has censored The Babylon Bee and U.S. Rep. Vicky Hartzler for expressing their views on gender identity ideology and its impact on women. These examples of viewpoint discrimination against high-profile users only scratch the surface of the distortion Twitter’s “hateful conduct” speech code does to Twitter’s “town square” in cyberspace.

‘Misinformation’ Policies Restrict Speech

The same free speech threats spring from policies barring so-called “misinformation” and “disinformation,” which have both been wielded to silence ongoing conversations about public health, gender identity ideology, voting integrity, and more. For example, one current Twitter policy defines “informational harm” as follows: “Harm that adversely impacts the ability for an individual to access information fundamental to exercising their rights, or that significantly disrupts the stability and/or safety of a social group or society including medical mis-information i.e. COVID-19.”

It’s difficult to imagine policy language that grants more discretion to restrict speech than the terms of this policy. There are no standards at all. The policy will inevitably be enforced based solely on Twitter employees’ subjective judgments about which views “impact the ability of a person to access information,” or “significantly disrupts the stability of society.” Those who control access to a speech forum, and what you are allowed to say, have no business wielding this kind of unchecked power over the exchange of ideas.

Twitter’s current policies fail to appreciate a critical First Amendment maxim: The answer to speech you don’t like is more speech, not censorship. As U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis wrote in a 1927 decision, “If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence.”

Thankfully, Musk appears fully cognizant of Twitter’s policies’ propensity to squelch free speech. He seems motivated to make good on Twitter’s promise “to give everyone the power to create and share ideas and information, and to express their opinions and beliefs without barriers.” To do so, he must eliminate Twitter’s speech codes, starting with the policies outlined above. Any essential limits on content should be shaped with surgical precision to give users clear notice of the boundaries and prevent employees’ biases from infecting their enforcement decisions.

Step Two: Adopt an Anti-censorship Policy

Musk should take one additional step to restore free speech on Twitter. He should adopt a policy that bars censorship and expressly states that it will not enforce any of its policies in a manner that restricts the free exchange of ideas. By doing so, he will provide his content moderation team a workable roadmap to implement his guiding free speech principles across the enterprise.

Here is model language Musk should consider for a new free speech policy:

Twitter does not discriminate against users, censor users or a user’s expression, or interfere with users’ ability to receive the expression of another based on the viewpoint of the user or another person, regardless of whether the viewpoint is expressed on the platform or through another medium.

No Twitter policies will be enforced in a manner that restricts expression on matters of public concern because of the expression’s viewpoint, even when some may find the expression offensive, hurtful, misguided, upsetting, or otherwise objectionable.

By following the steps outlined above, Musk can make important strides toward realizing his goal of aligning Twitter’s policies with First Amendment free speech protections.


Source

Gerald Celente – We Are Already in WWIII, Ministry of Truth, and More!

Gerald Celente – We Are Already in WWIII, Ministry of Truth, and More!

mariazeee Published May 7, 2022 8,274 Views

Gerald Celente is the Founder/Director of the Trends Research Institute and Publisher of the weekly Trends Journal magazine. He is the author of the highly acclaimed and best-selling books “Trend Tracking” and “Trends 2000” (Warner Books).

With a 40-year track record of identifying, tracking, and forecasting trends, Celente is world-renowned as today’s #1 Trend Forecaster.

He joined us to discuss a range of topics, including current world trends, World War III which he says we are already in, the Ministry of Truth, and more.

Gerald’s work can be found on his website and YouTube channel:

https://trendsresearch.com/
https://www.youtube.com/user/gcelente

If you would like to support Zeee Media to continue getting the truth out to more people, you can donate via this link:

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=48KZT6SYT2R44

Website:

https://www.zeeemedia.com

Uncensored on Telegram:

https://t.me/zeeemedia

Dr. Zelenko has saved thousands of lives through his Z-Stack protocol, and has recently launched Z-DTox which he advises will help prevent blood clots, and help protect those with a compromised immune system, including those who have been vaccinated.

To order Dr. Zelenko’s products today, visit the below link, and use referral code MARIAZEEE for 5% off your order:

https://zstacklife.com/?ref=MARIAZEEE

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

ECONOMIC DESTRUCTION, WORLD GOVERNMENT & SLAUGHTERBOTS

ECONOMIC DESTRUCTION, WORLD GOVERNMENT & SLAUGHTERBOTS

SGT Report – May 10th, 2022

Help Melt Body Fat Away With This Special Keto Powder!
Click Here–> http://ketowithsgt.com/
Try it today for 51% OFF ^^^ 😄

They are destroying the markets, ushering in world government and preparing the slaughterbots. This is an economic collapse, NWO news update.

SLAUGHTERBOTS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HipTO_7mUOw&t=467s

Take Action to HALT autonomous A.I. drones & robots:
https://autonomousweapons.org/take-action/

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

Biden’s New Press Secretary Is A ‘Stolen Election’ Conspiracy Theorist Who Called Trump An ‘Illegitimate President’

Biden’s New Press Secretary Is A ‘Stolen Election’ Conspiracy Theorist Who Called Trump An ‘Illegitimate President’

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki is hopping over to MSNBC where she’ll continue to run interference for President Joe Biden, so Karine Jean-Pierre will soon be filling her role as the executive spokeswoman. Although Jean-Pierre officially holds the title of principal deputy press secretary at the moment, a look through her old tweets shows that she is an election-denying, misinformation-peddling, conspiracy theorist.

After Donald Trump won the 2016 election, despite the best efforts of the Russia collusion-peddling corporate media, Jean-Pierre claimed the election was “stolen.”

“Stolen emails, stolen drone, stolen election …..welcome to the world of #unpresidented Trump,” Jean-Pierre tweeted.

She later strung together Hillary Clinton talking points to refer to him as “illegitimate,” writing, “Trump always finds a way to take it to the lowest of lows. Not only is he petulant dotard but also a deplorable illegitimate president.”

It wasn’t just general anti-Trump bitterness, however. Jean-Pierre has a habit of undermining election legitimacy. After Stacey Abrams lost the Georgia gubernatorial election in 2018 and refused to concede to the legitimately elected winner, Brian Kemp, Jean-Pierre came to the defense of a delusional Abrams, writing that “the race was stolen.”

As recently as April 2020, well into Kemp’s tenure as governor, the incoming White House press secretary was still spreading conspiracy theories about the election.

“Reminder: Brian Kemp stole the gubernatorial election from Georgians and Stacey Abrams,” Jean-Pierre wrote.

These are just a sampling of tweets, so maybe they don’t matter — except Democrats have assured us that they do.

After Biden prevailed in the 2020 election, Democrats said any claims of it being “stolen” or even questions about election integrity amounted to misinformation, conspiracy theories, a threat to our democracy, and even an insurrection. Posts about it have been spiked as “misinformation” by Facebook and Twitter, with YouTube taking down videos that talk about election integrity issues.

This is despite the fact that the election was rife with problems and malfeasance, including election laws being ignored or changed last minute, plus mass mail-in balloting and trafficking that lacked any legitimate oversight.

This is to say nothing of Big Tech running cover for the Biden family by censoring bombshell stories about their corruption, which voters admit might have changed their minds in casting a vote for the now-president. Or of media propagandists refusing to cover real news while spinning up fake scandals about Trump and neglecting to cover his administration’s massive victories. Or of tech oligarchs like Mark Zuckerberg dumping hundreds of millions of dollars into the election to staff government elections offices with Democrat operatives and running get-out-the-vote efforts in blue hubs.

The people who raise alarm bells about these glaring issues have spent the last year and a half being censored and smeared, with some of them being investigated by the FBI and branded as “insurrectionists” for being present in Washington, D.C., and daring to peacefully voice their concerns outside the Capitol.

Yet within Biden’s own inner circle is a conspiracy theorist who spreads misinformation about our elections and undermines our political process of self-government — and she just got a promotion.


Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)