Canada’s Health Minister: “You Will Never Be Fully-Vaxxed”

Canada’s Health Minister: “You Will Never Be Fully-Vaxxed”

ZeroHedge | by Tyler Durden Wednesday, Jul 06, 2022 – 01:44 AM

Authored by Mark Jeftovic via BombThrower.com,

This is the new ‘right way’ to think about vaccinations…

Despite increasingly compelling data and peer reviewed studies coming out detailing the harms and side-effects of vaccinations, Canada’s Liberal-Socialist coalition government is doubling down on vaccinations, and appear ready move the goalposts on what constitutes vaccine compliance.

As reported via Blacklocks Reporter (@mindingottawa on Twitter),

Canadians will be required to get a Covid shot every nine months for the foreseeable future, says Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos. Previous definitions of “fully vaccinated” made no sense, he told reporters.

“Nine months is very clear and will help people understand why ‘up to date’ is the right way to think about vaccination now,” said Duclos.

“‘Fully vaccinated’ makes no sense now. It’s about ‘up to date.’  So am I up to date in my vaccination? Have I received a vaccination in the last nine months?”

Duclos previously called for the provinces to make vaccinations mandatory and when asked by reporters if mandates would return this fall, he replied “We must continue to fight against Covid.”

Canada seems to be one of the few countries outside Communist China who is frantically clinging to the COVID narrative, relentlessly pushing largely ineffective  (and arguably dangerous) vaccines on an increasingly fed up population.

The Trudeau regime is increasingly unpopular,recent Angus Reid poll finding those who “strongly support” the government falling into single digits. The largest single category was “strongly disapprove” at 41%,

Reeling with numerous scandals, corruption and gaffes,  Justin Trudeau holds power solely through the merger of his party with the  Canada’s Socialist NDP, headed by millionaire Jagmeet Singh.

The deal ostensibly keeps him in office until 2025. Singh is also on the ropes, frequently being jeered in public even among his base constituency in Brampton, Ontario. His brother lost his seat in the recent Ontario election, and Sing himself was run out of a campaign stop by enraged Sikhs who called him “a sell out”.

Time For Your Plan B

Most agnostic and object political observers agree: should the Liberal-Socialist Party make it to 2025, they will be mercilessly deposed on par with the 1993 electoral bloodbath.  When Canadians had had enough of Brian Mulroney (he bailed before the election, leaving Kim Campbell holding the bag) and the Conservatives were blown out so badly they lost their party status: going from 156 seats in Parliament, to just 2.

Both the Liberals and NDPs face similar prospects by Canadians who are sick and tired of being called “fringe” and “racists”, fed up with being gaslit by a smug, out-of-touch, government subsidized media, and well  beyond done with this COVID business.

But until that happens, this clown show can do a lot of damage – mandatory vaccinations being just the beginning.

The economy is headed for a depression because our Finance Minister is an economically illiterate ideologue. We should be an energy super-power but instead this fully Woke government is demonizing our oil and gas industry and probably driving the West right out of confederation. Then they’re ramming through internet censorship bills that would make the CCP proud.

If you haven’t decided your line in the sand, it’s time to do that. I know mine.

And then get to work putting your Plan B in motion:

Start working on a second passport, setting up businesses, revenue streams and assets outside of Canada. Everybody knows I’m a huge Bitcoin fan, so holding a portion of your wealth in BTC keeps it out of the reach of these plundering tyrants.

If the government is going to move the goalposts, then the rest of us have to move the playing field. In this coming era of decentralization, the antidote to government overreach is extreme Sovereign Individualism.

*  *  *

Stay in the loop on setting up your Plan B and the coming monetary regime change by joining the Bombthrower mailing list.  Wherever you are on the path to being a Sovereign Individual, Bombthrower can help you navigate the terrain. (GettrTwitterTelegram)

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

Will Pfizer Be Charged for Mislabeling Jab Side Effects?



Story at-a-glance

  • Pfizer classified almost all severe adverse events that occurred during its Phase 3 trials as unrelated to the injection. A 2,566-page document catalogues serious adverse events and six deaths during the trial. These events were all classified as “toxicity level 4,” which is the most serious, yet none of them was deemed related to the injection

  • Examples of Level 4 adverse events — all of which were written off as “not related” to the mRNA injection — include acute respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, brain abscess, adrenal carcinoma (adrenal cancer) and chronic myeloid leukemia (blood and bone marrow cancer)

  • Most Level 3 adverse events were also dismissed as unrelated to the shot. Only a small number were listed as related. Examples of Level 3 side effects include tachycardia (disruption of the normal electrical impulses that control your heart rate — the very problem that underlies most cases of “sudden adult death syndrome” or SADS) and ventricular arrhythmia (abnormal heart rhythm that makes the lower chambers twitch rather than pump — another underlying cause of SADS)

  • A reanalysis of data from the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccine trials found that, combined, Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 jabs were associated with a risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated. Meanwhile, the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization was only 2.3 per 10,000 participants for Pfizer and 6.4 per 10,000 for Moderna

  • Whether intentional or not, mounting evidence now indicate the COVID-19 injections will result in depopulation through premature death and adverse effects on fertility in women and men alike. Research from Israel reveals the shot deteriorates sperm count and sperm motility in men for about three months post-jab

••••

Will Pfizer Be Charged for Mislabeling Vaccine Side Effects?

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

As the U.S. Food and Drug Administration continues to release Pfizer’s clinical trial documentation,1 we’re finding more and more evidence that very little has been done on the up-and-up, and the COVID jab trials may be among the most fraudulent in medical history.

Can All Serious Adverse Effects Be Written Off?

Importantly, Pfizer classified almost all severe adverse events that occurred during its Phase 3 trials as unrelated to the injection. As reported by The Defender, June 21, 2022:2

“The latest release by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine documents reveals numerous instances of participants who sustained severe adverse events during Phase 3 trials. Some of these participants withdrew from the trials, some were dropped and some died.

The 80,000-page document cache includes an extensive set of Case Report Forms (CRFs) from Pfizer Phase 3 trials conducted at various locations in the U.S., in addition to other documentation pertaining to participants in Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine trials in the U.S. and worldwide …

The CRFs included in this month’s documents contain often vague explanations of the specific symptoms experienced by the trial participants. They also reveal a trend of classifying almost all adverse events — and in particular severe adverse events (SAEs) — as being ‘not related’ to the vaccine.”

The Defender article includes 11 examples3 of trial participants who experienced severe adverse effects that were classified as “unrelated” to the experimental gene transfer technology they’d received just days or weeks earlier.

A 2,566-page document4 catalogues the serious adverse events and six deaths that occurred during the trial. These events were all classified as “toxicity level 4,” which is the most serious, yet none of them were deemed related to the injection.

This simply isn’t believable. It’s completely unrealistic, especially when serious events occur in multiple participants. A handful of examples of Level 4 adverse events listed in this document — all of which were written off as “not related” to the mRNA injection — include:5

  • Acute respiratory failure
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Brain abscess
  • Adrenal carcinoma (adrenal cancer)
  • Chronic myeloid leukemia (blood and bone marrow cancer)

The six deaths reported were listed as being caused by arteriosclerosis, cardiac arrest, hemorrhagic stroke and myocardial infarction.6 Many participants also dropped out or were excluded from the trial due to serious side effects involving the heart, cardiovascular system, cancer, stroke, hemorrhage and neurological impacts.

Examples of Level 3 Adverse Events

Most Level 3 adverse events were also dismissed as unrelated to the shot. As reported by The Defender, only a “small number” were listed as being related to the injection. Examples of Level 3 side effects include:7

  • Deafness/hearing loss
  • Tachycardia (disruption of the normal electrical impulses that control your heart rate — the very problem that underlies most cases of “sudden adult death syndrome” or SADS)
  • Ventricular arrhythmia (abnormal heart rhythm that makes the lower chambers twitch rather than pump — another underlying cause of SADS)
  • Neutropenia (low neutrophil level in your blood; neutrophils are a type of white blood cell made by your bone marrow that fight infections by destroying viruses and bacteria)
  • Vertigo

45% Experienced One or More Adverse Events

Another document8 that raises suspicions of bias is one admitting that “40% to 45% of participants who received BNT162b1 and BNT162b2 across age groups and across dose levels reported one or more AEs [adverse events] from Dose 1 through 28 days (i.e., 1 month) after Dose 2.”

BNT162b2 was the candidate injection that went on to receive Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the FDA. Among those who got the highest dose (30 micrograms) of BNT162b2, 50% of younger participants 25% in the older age group reported one or more adverse events.

The most common adverse events were nervous system disorders, followed by musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders. Yet despite high rates of side effects across dose levels, this document also insists that “most AEs were considered by the investigator as not related to study intervention.”

During the open-label period of the study, 12,006 participants were followed for a minimum of six months, and among those, 28.8% reported at least one adverse event at some point during that follow-up, and 2.1% reported one or more severe adverse events.

Incidence Rate in Treatment Group FAR Higher Than Placebo

As reported by The Defender:9

“The review provides data for participants from dose 3 … to the data cutoff date. The severe adverse event incidence rate (IR) was 6.0 per 100 PY (patient-years), with specific conditions reported including pulmonary embolisms, thrombosis, urticaria, a cerebrovascular accident and COVID-19 pneumonia.

Here, the review adds that the IR for original placebo participants who had at least 1 life-threatening AE from Dose 3 to the data cutoff date was 0.5 per 100 PY.

Only one such life-threatening event, an instance of anaphylactoid reaction, was considered to be related to the vaccination. Other life-threatening, serious adverse events included cardio-respiratory arrest, gastrointestinal necrosis, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism …

Notably, according to the review, ‘all … events of facial paralysis were considered by the investigator as related to study intervention.” [Editor’s note: these specifically refer to events that occurred during the open-label follow-up period when BNT162b2 Dose 3 or Dose 4 was offered to both placebo and initial treatment groups.]

Young Children Have Extremely Low Risk of Death From COVID

In the end, we all know what happened. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, Pfizer concluded the shot was safe and effective for everyone and the FDA went along with it. The vaccine manufacturers and the FDA have decided it isn’t even worth invoking the precautionary principle for the very youngest of children, which is nothing short of reprehensible, criminal maleficence.

In mid-June 2022, against strong objections from physicians, scientists and researchers, the FDA’s vaccine advisory panel — the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) — unanimously agreed to grant EUA to both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID shots for infants and young children.10,11

Pfizer’s EUA is for a three-dose regimen (3-microgram shots) for children 6 months to 5 years old, while Moderna’s EUA is for a two-dose regimen (25-microgram shots) for children 6 months to 6 years.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,12 an estimated 75% of American children ages birth to 11 already have some level of immunity, having been exposed to one of the several variants that have come into circulation over the past two-plus years.

This immunity level alone makes EUA for COVID shots questionable. CDC data also prove young children have a very low risk of hospitalization and death from COVID, which makes the EUAs even more questionable.

Data13 published in mid-March 2022 suggest babies and young children under the age of 4 have had a peak hospitalization rate for COVID of 14.5 per 100,000. That peak occurred after Omicron became predominant. The hospitalization rate for the Delta variant in this age group was 2.9 per 100,000.

In all, since March 2020, a total of 2,562 infants and young children (6 months to 4 years) have been hospitalized WITH COVID. Of those, 2,068 had COVID listed as the primary reason for admission (84.7% of the total), and only 624 required ICU admission.

The median length of hospital stay was 1.5 days (range: one to three days). Of the 2,562 children with suspected COVID infection, 16 of them (0.6%) died in the hospital. Death certificate data push that number a bit higher. The Vaccine Reaction notes,14 “According to death certificate data,15 202 deaths have been attributed to COVID-19 among children 6 months to 4 years of age through May 11, 2022.”

While any death is tragic, it’s worth noting that 923 (35.8%) of the children hospitalized with suspected COVID also had one or more underlying medical conditions.16 We don’t know for sure, but it’s quite possible that those who died with a COVID diagnosis actually died from whatever underlying condition was present or had brought them to the hospital in the first place.

What I’m trying to say is that 16 to 202 deaths over two-plus years aren’t cause for panic, and that’s true even if COVID was the primary cause of those deaths. The likelihood of your child getting injured by the mRNA shot is undoubtedly significantly greater than their risk of dying from COVID.

Jab More Likely to Put You in the Hospital Than Keep You Out

The same is true for adults, by the way. A June 2022 analysis17,18 of Pfizer and Moderna trial data found the shots are more likely to put you in the hospital than keep you out of it. As reported by The Daily Sceptic:19

“A new paper20 by BMJ Editor Dr. Peter Doshi and colleagues has analyzed data from the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccine trials and found that the vaccines are more likely to put you in hospital with a serious adverse event than keep you out by protecting you from COVID.

The pre-print (not yet peer-reviewed) focuses on serious adverse events highlighted in a WHO-endorsed ‘priority list21 of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines.’ The authors evaluated these serious adverse events of special interest as observed in ‘phase III randomized trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines’ …

Dr. Doshi and colleagues found that the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 events per 10,000 vaccinated for Pfizer and 15.1 events per 10,000 vaccinated for Moderna …

When combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with a risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated … The authors note that this level of increased risk post-vaccine is greater than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization in both Pfizer and Moderna trials, which was 2.3 per 10,000 participants for Pfizer and 6.4 per 10,000 for Moderna.

This means that on this measure, the Pfizer vaccine results in a net increase in serious adverse events of 7.8 per 10,000 vaccinated and the Moderna vaccine of 8.7 per 10,000 vaccinated.”

Doshi’s team wasn’t the first to reanalyze Pfizer’s trial data. The Canadian COVID Care Alliance has also published a clear and easy-to-read summary22 of the Pfizer trial results, and the many questions raised by it. As noted by Dr. Robert Malone:23

“The bottom line is that the Pfizer Phase 3 trial which was used by NIAID [the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases], FDA and CDC to justify the emergency use authorization is pretty much a junk clinical trial which was inappropriately halted long before it even got close to meeting the intended follow up period, did not provide a sufficiently long follow up analysis of vaccination-associated adverse events, and in which the control group was intentionally eliminated.

This resulted in basically erasing any opportunity to ever get to the bottom of what the major true risks of the Pfizer mRNA inoculations were. In terms of more minor risks, the study was not powered (not big enough) to evaluate those.”

FDA and CDC Have Neglected Important Duties

Doshi and his coauthors also note the FDA also watered down results by including “thousands of additional participants with very little follow-up, of which the large majority had only received one dose.”

They then further diluted the appearance of risk by counting only the number of people affected rather than counting the total number of individual adverse events. This makes a big difference, as twice as many people in the treatment group reported multiple serious adverse events, as compared to the placebo group.

The FDA and CDC have both also failed to produce promised follow-up investigations. In July 2021, now a full year ago, the FDA said it would investigate four “potential adverse events of interest following Pfizer vaccination,” namely pulmonary embolism, acute myocardial infarction, immune thrombocytopenia and disseminated intravascular coagulation, but to date, no update has been issued.

Similarly, in early 2021, the CDC published a protocol on how to use proportional reporting ratios to detect signals in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), but no study or report showing what that protocol might have found has ever been published.

As it turns out, the CDC hasn’t been looking for safety signals in VAERS — not with the proportional ratios protocol or any other. So, while they’ve publicly claimed they haven’t seen any signals of concern, the reason they haven’t seen any signals is very simple: They never looked at the data!24

That’s how ridiculous things are now. When a drug company or health agency claims they haven’t found a problem, you actually have to ask them, “where, when, how and how often did you look?” But of course, virtually no one would ever ask such questions because they would assume these agencies are competent, which of course is a false assumption.

Their Fraudulent Behavior Could Be Their Undoing

As you probably know, the makers of the COVID shots are indemnified against legal liability for any injuries and all deaths stemming from their products. No one is able to sue them for damages.

The only way to hold them responsible is to prove they’ve committed fraud. This would remove their liability immunity. As detailed at the beginning of the article, their consciously choosing to miscategorize adverse events during the initial trials and concealing the harms should be a slam dunk to convict them of fraud.

But there is also another fact they concealed: There’s evidence showing they knew the mRNA doesn’t stay in the injection site but, rather, distributes throughout the body,25 and this too could be a smoking gun that proves fraud. If convicted of fraud, Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen would likely face liabilities in the trillions of dollars in damages.

When I exposed Merck’s Vioxx scandal in 1999 in this newsletter, before they even released their drug on the market, I thought that was huge. Their drug killed more than 60,000 people, and they could have been liable for $25 billion in damages, but their clever lawyers reduced it to $5 billion.

Well, that catastrophe is a drop in the bucket compared to the COVID scam, which has likely killed between 600,000 and 750,000 Americans, disabled as many as 5 million, and injured an estimated 30 million Americans in one way or another.26,27 That’s just the estimated toll in the U.S., so you can imagine what the global numbers might be. It’s a catastrophe of unprecedented proportions. A June 2022 survey by Steve Kirsch also found:28

  • 6.6% of COVID jabbed respondents suffered heart injury (about 10 million Americans, based on the national vaccination rate)
  • 6.3% had to be hospitalized for their side effects (another 10 million Americans)
  • 9.2% of those who took the jab had to seek medical help for their injury, which translated over the whole country would be about 18 million doctor’s visits
  • People who got the shot were more likely to die from COVID than the unvaccinated
  • 2.63% of the responders had lost someone in their household to COVID infection, and 2.03% had lost someone in their household to the COVID jab

Expect Depopulation

Whether intentional or not, mounting evidence now indicates the COVID-19 injections will result in depopulation through premature death and adverse effects on fertility in women and men alike. I’ve previously discussed the risk of pregnancy loss and infertility in women who get the shot, as the mRNA has an affinity for accumulating in the ovaries29 (as well as the adrenals, liver and bone marrow).

Research30,31 from Israel now also reveals the shot deteriorates sperm count and sperm motility in men for about three months. Considering the multidose mRNA shots are recommended at three-month intervals, you can see how this can really decimate a man’s prospects of fathering a child.

Fertility has been on a steady decline for decades in most parts of the world,32 but the worldwide COVID jab campaign may massively speed that up. Germany recently released data showing a 10% decline in birth rate during the first quarter of 2022.33

Germany - First Quarter births by year 2011-2022

Other countries are also seeing a drop in birth rate, nine months after the start of the mass vaccination campaign against COVID. Between January and April 2022, Switzerland’s birth rate was 15% lower than expected, the U.K.’s was down by 10% and Taiwan’s was down 20%.34

What punishment could possibly be appropriate for company heads and health agency leaders responsible for causing massive depopulation worldwide through products that were based on fraudulent science and fictional claims? I doubt if there’s enough money in the world to set that right.

Future Trials To Be Skipped Altogether

As if matters weren’t already beyond horrible, the FDA is considering allowing manufacturers to reformulate their COVID injections in perpetuity without conducting any additional clinical trials!35 In other words, they’d allow drug companies to change the mRNA and/or other ingredients without any safety or efficacy testing whatsoever. As reported by Toby Rogers, Ph.D., in a June 27, 2022, article in The Defender:36

“FDA released a briefing document37 in connection with this scheme to end science as we know it in connection with future COVID-19 shots … The briefing document is 18 pages of text, 1.5 line spacing, with just 19 references — 9 of which are pre-prints or from the CDC’s in-house newsletter Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) which means they are not peer-reviewed.

Any true believer in The Narrative(TM) could have written this in a few hours. To base the entire future of COVID-19 shots on this glorified undergrad term paper is madness …

The core argument of the briefing document is hilarious (or rather, it would be hilarious if it was not a plan to permanently institutionalize genocide and hide the evidence). In several places the FDA argues (colloquialisms mine):

1. These COVID-19 shots work great … Boosters too, total home run, the Israelis even have 10-weeks of data showing that they might help old people. What more evidence could you want?

2. Okay, well, it depends on what you mean by ‘work.’ These shots do not stop infection, transmission, hospitalization, or death, even though that’s why we licensed them. Any protection wears off fairly quickly, but It’s Not Our Fault(TM) because This Wily Virus(TM) mutates too fast and no one told us that it would ever mutate.

3. So these shots must be reformulated but we cannot possibly ask Lord Pharma to do proper clinical trials ever again because we already know that these shots work great (see point #1)!”

In short, the FDA argues that since there are time constraints, evaluation of effectiveness must rely on “measures other than actual health outcomes.” In other words, whether the shots actually lower your risk of severe illness, hospitalization and death will have no bearing.

The only measure they’ll take into account is whether or not the jab triggers a rise in antibody levels, which has never been proven to be beneficial. If anything, the increase in COVID antibodies actually increases your risk of infection. This also means that as long as antibody levels are through the roof, the death rate could be just about anything, because it’s not part of the safety equation.

Faith in Magic Has Officially Replaced Science

As noted by Rogers,38 “The ‘Future Framework’ is a plan to base the entire COVID-19 vaccine program on magical thinking rather than science.” Indeed, Dr. Deborah Birx recently confirmed that the whole vaccine push has been based in faith in magic.39

June 23, 2022, Birx answered questions from the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, asked whether the government was lying or guessing when they stated that vaccinated individuals couldn’t catch or spread COVID. At first, she claimed she didn’t know, but when pressed, she replied, “I think it was hope that the vaccine would work in that way.”40

So, the government issued mandates and made unequivocal, absolute statements that were not allowed to be questioned because they HOPED the shots would work a certain way — all while insisting they were the ones following and trusting the science and anyone who questioned their logic was a dangerous nut job. Let that sink in. Hope is literally the diametrical opposite of science.

It’s an Insiders’ Plot

As explained by Rogers, the same old players are behind this brazen attempt to eliminate the need for clinical trials: CDC staffers, academics who are in the pockets of Bill Gates and the NIAID, the drug companies themselves and the World Health Organization. Rogers writes:41

“I did not understand until just yesterday (as I started to write this article) that this entire ‘Future Framework’ is actually coming from the WHO. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the biggest voluntary contributor to the WHO. So Gates is likely directing the play.

Gates requires that WHO use the McKinsey consulting firm so this is probably a McKinsey operation (and McKinsey also works for Pharma so this is a huge conflict of interest). As Naomi Wolf points out, the involvement of the WHO also raises troubling questions about the influence of the Chinese Communist Party over this process.

As far back as January, the WHO/Gates/McKinsey junta realized that these shots were terrible and so they decided to use that as an opportunity to seize even more power and control.

The WHO set up a Technical Advisory Group on COVID-19 Vaccine Composition (TAG-CO-VAC) to implement these Orwellian ‘Future Frameworks’ across the developed world to lower manufacturing costs for Pharma and avoid bothersome health data that might hurt profits. All the messaging we have seen from the FDA and leaked to the press was initially developed and released by TAG-CO-VAC.”

No doubt, we live in unprecedented, precarious times. Logic, reason, science and sanity itself has been tossed aside by those who claim the right to make decisions for all mankind. If the FDA goes forward with this “Future Framework” scheme, the only safe assumption is that COVID shots will become more and more dangerous.

Worse, we can expect other vaccines and drugs to be allowed on the market without clinical trials as well. It truly could change the science of medicine as we know it.

Of course the WHO also wants to seize control over health care worldwide, which would eliminate medical rights everywhere. It’s a nightmare scenario with no end in sight as of yet. All we can do is continue to push back, to inform ourselves, to speak out, share facts and data, and refuse to comply with unscientific recommendations based on little more than hope in fabricated conclusions.

••••

Sources and References:

••••

Related: Former Pfizer Exec Speaks Out

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

The Death of the Liberal World Order, Russia Can Not Stop Till Total Victory, Justice is Coming

The Death of the Liberal World Order, Russia Can Not Stop Till Total Victory, Justice is Coming

SonOfEnos – July 4th, 2022

We The People are the STORM!!! and Truly, NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING.

If you’d like to support this channel, here’s the link https://givesendgo.com/sonofenos

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

What Dr. Paul Alexander Was Told Privately About the VVV’s in 2020

What Dr. Paul Alexander Was Told Privately About the VVV’s in 2020


Warning: coming many Americans, many people will die because of these COVID injections, many healthy children WILL die due to these shots; FDA, CDC, NIH, Moderna, & Pfizer secretly told me this

I was told in discussions with FDA, CDC, NIH, Moderna, & Pfizer officials in Washington at HHS July/August 2020, their grave concerns, why they must be silent as in fear for safety and careers; Toby!!

I have been trying to warn. I have written on this here in stack.

I was told by these officials, in confidential secret discussions, that in about 6 to 6.5 years from roll-out, in those who take the injections, they feared mass auto-immune disease and deaths, they feared viral immune escape and very problematic variants, and they anticipated constant deaths from the injections but a major number of deaths to emerge. They said, based on all they knew, that the COVID injections could never work, especially the mRNA platform. It never worked in the animal model and was pathological. They told me that in about 6 to 6.5 years, there will be a surge in deaths in persons who take the injections. They advised me they nor their families will never take any of the COVID injections.

I am being open with you to inform you. I am sick and tired, years now, of the lies and fraud and disaster put out by the media, the alphabet health agencies, etc. You trusted your public health officials, you think ‘they care about you’. Well, they never cared about you, your family, or the truth. It is to them about the $CIENCE.

I think I shared prior that my office was on the 6th floor of the HHS building in DC, Operation Warp Speed and Moderna were stationed on the 7th floor. FDA, CDC, etc. have sub-satellite offices at HHS. At least, when I was there and Hahn, Redfield, etc. came there daily after Congress or White House to see their staff, various persons, persons in various offices.

These people I talked with came to me out of anger and fear, too. They knew who I was and wanted to tell me their stories and how worried they were for the population, and fearful for their lives and own careers as to the COVID injections (and other issues). If they spoke out openly so had to talk secretly.

They were very very dismayed and angered and worried as to why the agencies they worked for, e.g. FDA and NIH and CDC etc. and the pharmaceuticals were not properly regulating and conducting the proper safety studies, proper durations of follow-up. They felt the COVID injection program was a pure disaster and should be stopped back then. This is 6 months or so before roll-out (ER: summer 2020). They felt no healthy children should ever be given the very injections they were working on. They were that concerned.

I want to be clear again, based on all I know today, based on what I was told, many many children will die due to these injections. Healthy children will die, not ‘if’, but ‘will’ die. Healthy children, healthy people, normal people never needed and do not need these injections. I have told you before that (strong research and scholarship by Geert) we will be in a pandemic for 100 years if we continue these injections. It is the COVID injection itself that is driving the variants and these CDC, NIH, Moderna, and Pfizer officials are malfeasants IMO who are continuing this. There is no sound justification. These malfeasants know that they are vaccinating with the Wuhan strain (legacy strain) that has been gone many months now and omicron dominates. The vaccinal antibodies are to the original Wuhan strain and will not hit the omicron spike antigen (original antigenic sin (OAS)).

It is the COVID injection (and consequent non-neutralizing antibodies pressuring the spike antigen) that is causing the vaccinated to become infected, hospitalized, and die. The data is clear. Massive antibody-dependent enhancement, some refer to this as antibody mediated viral enhancement. Some pathogenic priming. All IMO the very same. The recall antibodies are to something that does not exist today. The key is to reduce viral pressure, infectious pressure on the population, so that the sub-optimal injections have less virus to put under pressure. We have effective chemoprophylaxis, we can do this. We have early treatment. This can worked effectively and this can thus help reduce viral transmission. At the same time, the best step is to stop these filed injections.

I want all of these people investigated in proper public and legal inquiries, and if it is shown they did wrong, in proper inquiries, I want them arrested. I want all who made policy decisions that costed lives, to be jailed! All their monies taken!

Dr. Toby Rogers looked at the FDA June 28th meeting and his takeaway is bang on and what we have been saying here for near a year now here:

‘‘Yesterday, the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee approved a bivalent Covid-19 shot with the Wuhan strain and the Omicron variant.

The vote was:

19 yes.
2 no.

A few thoughts:

The Wuhan strain is no longer in circulation. So they are vaccinating against a strain that no longer exists.

The Omicron variant that they are going to put into this shot is Omicron BA.4/BA.5:

1. By the time it gets to market in the fall, Omicron BA.4/BA.5 will likely no longer be in circulation.

2. There is no efficacy data whatsoever on vaccines against Omicron BA.4/5.

3. There is no safety data whatsoever on vaccines against Omicron BA.4/5.

4. They do not intend to gather any efficacy or safety data between now and when these shots will be released in the fall:

At the meeting, the manufacturers (Moderna, Pfizer, and Novavax) were asked what their production timelines are… and they said out loud, “So long as we don’t have to provide any clinical data, we’ll have them ready by fall.”

Dr. Toby Rogers is a smart guy.

His work:

Source

************

Source

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Visit Original Source

The Insufferable Arrogance Of The … Constantly Wrong

The Insufferable Arrogance Of The … Constantly Wrong


The Insufferable Arrogance of the Constantly Wrong

By: Clayton Fox

The media, and the people who work in and around it, the Blue Checks™ of Twitter, have upped the ante over the past few years regarding how far they are willing to go to enforce various preferred narratives. 

Pick any major story of the past three years—e.g. Lab Leak, Jussie Smollett, Russiagate, Ukrainian Biolabs, Ivermectin, Hospitalizations From COVID v. With Covid, January 6th, ‘Transitory’ Inflation, and of course Hunter’s Laptop—and you will find absolutely hysterical narrative pushing up front followed by retractions, corrections, and outright denials as reality became undeniable. 

In the meanwhile, our civilization was ripped apart, our citizens were gaslit and impoverished, and in countries across the Western world, innocent people were removed from polite society, branded as lepers, and fired from their jobs. 

Why? Because there is one story that just won’t die and for which no corrections have been issued—the shibboleth that vaccination can prevent infection, transmission, and help “end” COVID.

While there is never an excuse for hateful rhetoric towards, and intervention in, the personal medical choices of law-abiding Americans, perhaps one could have, kinda sorta, understood the campaign if the new vaccines had provided long-lasting immunity and prevented community transmission. They do not. 

Early on we were told: “Nine out of ten [vaccinated] people won’t get sick” (Columbia University feat. Run-DMC, February 12th, 2021, no this is not a joke); “Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don`t get sick” (Dr. Rochelle Walensky, March 29th, 2021); “When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected” (Dr. Anthony Fauci, May 17th, 2021). 

And by mid-summer, 2021, we were still being told that unequivocally, these vaccines were a resounding success worthy of uncritical support. On July 27th in Scientific American, Dr. Eric Topol wrote, “Vaccination is the closest thing to a sure thing we have in this pandemic.” Not to be outdone, Dr. Anthony Fauci of the NIAID told CBS on August 1st, that the unvaccinated were responsible for “propagating this outbreak.” 

But on July 29th, 2021, the Washington Post reported a scoop that the CDC was privately acknowledging that the vaccinated could spread COVID as easily as the unvaccinated. Occasionally, they are forced to report inconvenient facts. And August 5th, CDC Director Walensky told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that, “They continue to work well for Delta, with regard to severe illness and death — they prevent it. But what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.”

While there is a mountain of medical literature available demonstrating quite clearly the failure of these vaccines to prevent infection and transmission, the August 5th declaration from the CDC Director should have made clear that being vaccinated is contributing in no way to the safety of others, nor to the eradication of this virus. 

In fact, Israeli Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz was even caught on tape in September of last year explaining that the use of the Israeli Green Pass wasn’t intended to make a difference epidemiologically, but because it would help convince people to get vaccinated. And even vaccine poobah Bill Gates admitted in a late 2021 interview, that, “We got vaccines to help you with your health, but they only slightly reduce the transmissions.”

So there should be no question that continuing to suggest in any way that these shots are a panacea, and that those who refused to get them were plague spreaders, should have been thoroughly trashed by Fall 2021. 

Nonetheless, on September 24th President Joe Biden coined his now famous phrase “a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” To our north, Prime Minister Trudeau called the unvaccinated science deniers, misogynists, and racists, and asked rhetorically whether Canadians should “tolerate” them.

And during the first week of January 2022, while kicking the unvaccinated out of French daily life and public spaces, French President Emmanuel Macron said he wanted the measures to “piss off” his unvaccinated citizens. With world leaders speaking this way, it’s no wonder so many Blue Check™ elites took up the banner!

Prominent media figures like Amy Siskind, Pulitzer Prize winner Gene Weingarten, and more have come out of the woodwork in recent months to share with us their enthusiasm for medical discrimination. Noted neurotic Howard Stern is all in on forced vaccination due to what must be his own debilitating fear of his mortality. Bill Kristol says the unvaccinated have “blood on their hands.”

David Frum, heir to Maimonides, writes, “Let the hospitals quietly triage emergency care to serve the unvaccinated last.” Charles M. Blow was “furious” at the unvaccinated. CNN contributor Dr. Leana Wen suggested that the unvaccinated should not be allowed to leave their homes. The Ragin’ Cajun even wants to punch the unvaccinated in the face!

All of the above links/stories were posted after Dr. Walensky’s unequivocal announcement that the vaccines do not prevent transmission.

And all of the self-satisfied segregationists are supported in their vitriol by the Blue Checks™ of the Medical Establishment, like Dr. Paul Klotman, President and Executive Dean of the Baylor School of Medicine, who said on camera back in January that he isn’t polite to friends and family who aren’t vaccinated. “Keep them away. I don’t do it respectfully, I tell them to stay away, and teach them a lesson.” Less vitriolic but equally problematic, the WHO’s COVID-19 “technical lead” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove continued to push the lie that vaccination can prevent outbreaks as recently as January 26th, 2022. She is, as well, a Blue Check™. And yes, Dr. Anthony Fauci is still at it, even as of April 14th, 2022, telling MSNBC that harsh Chinese lockdowns could be used to get the population vaccinated so that “When you open up, you won’t have a surge of infections.”

The examples are legion. Blue Checks, Medical Blue Checks, Times Columnists, Radio Jocks, Presidents, and Prime Ministers have all espoused misinformation and/or hate speech regarding vaccination status. But they are all given intellectual cover by the official reporting of the fourth estate. Even in the face of all the evidence that there is no epidemiological basis for discrimination, our intellectual betters in the legacy media press onward the canard.

On August 26th, the Toronto Star ran an article entitled, “When it comes to empathy for the unvaccinated, many of us aren’t feeling it.” Then, on December 22nd, published an explainer which stated that two doses won’t stop you from spreading COVID-19. Comme ci, comme ca.

Back in February, MSNBC political contributor Matthew Dowd shared his insight that the unvaccinated do not believe in the United States Constitution, because if they did, they would get vaccinated for “We The People.” For the common good.

An examination of the New York Times reveals three articles written this year which overtly continue supporting the idea that the vaccines prevent transmission. First, on January 29th in a piece entitled, “As Covid Shots For Kids Stall, Appeals Are Aimed At Wary Parents,” the author cites “public health officials” who say that to aid in “containing” the pandemic, kids must also be vaccinated. (It is worth mentioning that the current vaccines and boosters being distributed were designed in February 2020 to provide an immune response to a version of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein circulating prior to that, not entirely similar to what is circulating now.)

Then February 23rd, in a hit piece on the Surgeon General of Florida Dr. Joe Ladapo, the Times writes, “When public health officials across the country were urging vaccines as a way to end the pandemic, Dr. Ladapo was raising warning flags about possible side effects and cautioning that even vaccinated people could spread the virus.”

So, Dr. Ladapo was correct?

Finally, in a piece about Novak Djokovic published March 3rd, they write, “Djokovic was the only player ranked in the top 100 in Australia who had not received a Covid-19 vaccination, which experts have long said will not eradicate the virus unless most of the population receives one.”

They do not address the question of how a vaccine which does not prevent transmission can eradicate a virus. And they won’t. As Israeli Health Minister Horowitz candidly admitted, none of this is about epidemiology.

And even when mainstream media tacitly acknowledges the failures of the vaccines to prevent transmission, they skillfully elide the significance of this fact in order to allow them to continue to scapegoat the unvaccinated. In a dazzling display of sophistry, Time Magazine moved the Overton window in this January 12th, 2022 piece, “These Charts Show That COVID-19 Is Still A Pandemic of the Unvaccinated.”

The author states that due to the rapidly narrowing gap between cases in the vaccinated and unvaccinated, some readers might think that the phrase “pandemic of the unvaccinated” is no longer justifiable. But with the grace of a ballerina, Time goes on to tell us that because the vaccines are still showing efficacy against severe illness, the phrase is still kosher. If an unvaccinated person gets sicker than his vaccinated neighbor who contracted COVID at a fully vaccinated wedding, that unvaccinated person is still the problem!

New York Magazine isn’t lacking in similar gymnastics. On February 16th of this year, Matt Stieb published a piece entitled, “Is Kyrie Irving Going to Get Away With It?” Irving is the Brooklyn Nets player who famously chose not to be vaccinated, and has become a fetish object for the Covidian Left. Stieb acknowledges that Irving’s vaccinated teammates were getting COVID at such high rates that it forced Nets management to allow Irving back to play in away games but still calls the New York City ban on unvaccinated athletes “a rare public health mandate with real teeth.”

Just seven days later on February 23rd, Will Leitch, in the same publication, sighs, “Unfortunately, It’s Time to Let Kyrie Irving Play in New York.” He outlines all the reasons why epidemiologically it makes no sense to prevent athletes like Irving and Novak Djokovic from participating, but says, “It would feel like they got away with all their bullshit.” And also, they are “annoying.”

And this barely concealed hatred for the unvaccinated from media and government and Big Tech—even in the rare moments when writers such as Leitch acknowledge the failure of the vaccines to prevent transmission—has real consequences. People have lost their jobs. People have been arrested for trying to go to a movie theater.

Families got kicked out of restaurants, and patrons either cheered or remained indifferent, which is worse. A teenage boy at an uber-progressive and expensive Chicago prep school committed suicide after being bullied over an incorrect rumor he was unvaccinated. The stench of bad journalism rots people’s basic decency.

A January Rasmussen poll found that, “Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Democratic voters would favor a government policy requiring that citizens remain confined to their homes at all times, except for emergencies, if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine…Forty-five percent (45%) of Democrats would favor governments requiring citizens to temporarily live in designated facilities or locations if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine…”

As well as, “Twenty-nine percent (29%) of Democratic voters would support temporarily removing parents’ custody of their children if parents refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine.” Unfortunately, these disturbing results are politically lopsided, but it’s no surprise when you consider who the readers of most legacy media platforms are.

The saddest thing is that these media outlets and their flag bearers really think their readers are all morons. The New York Times believes that, in the midst of the Omicron wave as boosted person after boosted person was getting COVID, they could tell you these particular vaccines are still the way to eradicate this thing, and expect you to deny reality and nod your head.

It calls to mind the quote attributed to Solzhenitsyn (or Elena Gorokhova), “The rules are simple: they lie to us, we know they’re lying, they know we know they’re lying, but they keep lying to us, and we keep pretending to believe them.”

We have ceded the better angels of our common cerebrum to people who may not have our best interests at heart, and a sycophantic laptop class who gleefully endorses their diktats and “fact-checks.” Collectively: Sophistry Inc.

Their behavior, endorsed by every single entity which holds power in our society, is destroying us, and has already poisoned us such that there may be no antidote. Yes, first they came for the unvaccinated, but that doesn’t mean they won’t come for you next.

••••

This article (The Insufferable Arrogance of the Constantly Wrong) was published on the website BROWNSTONE INSTITUTE and is republished with permission and attribution to the author Clayton Fox and brownstone.org.

About the above articles Author: Clayton Fox was a 2020 Tablet Magazine Fellow. He has been published at Tablet, Real Clear Investigations, Los Angeles Magazine, and JancisRobinson.com.

••••

Read more articles COVID Vaccines & Mandates

••••

Click the image below to visit this new site:

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

US Federal Court Rules Death Caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 2)

US Federal Court Rules Death Caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 2)


US Federal Court Rules Death caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 2)

(To read part Part 1 before continuing see link below article)

By TLB Contributing Partner: Christina England, BA, Hons

This case is one of many from Shattered Dreams the HPV Vaccine Exposed.

Mrs Tarsell Takes the Case to Court

To medically investigate and support her claim, Emily’s attorney asked leading cardiologist and electrophysiologist, Professor Michael Eldar, M.D., FACC, FESC, FHRS, and leading immunologist, Professor Yehuda Shoenfeld, MD, FRCP, MaACR, to examine her daughter’s case in detail.

Tarsell vs. Department of Health and Human Services for the Death of Christina from Gardasil

Emily explained:

Four experts, two representing our family and two representing the government, attorneys for the respective sides and myself testified at the hearing on November 13-14, 2014. Special Master Christian Moran presided over the hearing. In the “vaccine court” there is no judge or jury.

Since there were no structural problems with Chris’s heart as confirmed by an earlier echocardiogram and by the coroner’s report, the problem was likely due to a disturbance in the rhythm of the heart, which is regulated by an electrophysiological process. Dr. Michael Eldar is a world-class expert in this field. Excerpts from his testimony and that of the other experts follow.”

The questions posed by Dr. Eldar were:

  1. What was the nature of the arrhythmia found in the ECG tracings of Christina Tarsell?

  1. Could this arrhythmia have caused her sudden death?”

The answers, according to Dr. Eldar’s report, were as follows:

  1. The arrhythmia was RVOT VPCs.

  1. The RVOT VPCs are the probable cause of death of Christina Tarsell.”

Emily explained to us that:

Regarding the nature of the arrhythmia, both the expert cardiologist representing the government, Dr. Scott Yeager, and Dr. Eldar agreed on review of Chris’s ECGs that the arrhythmia was of the type ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) rather than premature atrial contractions (PACs) as originally diagnosed by her primary care doctor.”

Dr. Eldar wrote:

Dr. Yeager reviewed the ECGs and he diagnosed the premature beats as ventricular premature complexes (VPCs), rather than PACs, originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). I examined two ECGs, recorded on November 20, 2007, and December 27, 2007, and I agree with the diagnosis of Dr. Yeager.”

Dr. Eldar continued that:

Dr. Yeager claims that this type of arrhythmia is common in adolescents and states that this type of VPCs is “usually felt to be at quite low risk, and may even be cleared for competitive athletics.” (Page 6)

While this claim is true for many cases of RVOT VPCs, it is definitely not true for all of them.”

He explained that whilst this information is true, there are different types of RVOT VPCs with different morphologies, and the type seen in Christina’s ECGs was consistent with types seen in people with normal hearts who developed life-threatening arrhythmia. This type is described in the literature as “malignant” RVOT VPCs. After giving several examples from papers that supported his claim, Dr. Eldar wrote:

In summary: the VPCs in the ECG tracings of Christina Tarsell were very similar in their form and in their CI to those described as malignant RVOT VPCs in the above mentioned studies.”

Dr. Eldar argued that the RVOT VPCs were the probable cause of Christina’s death. Furthermore, he pointed out that, in fact, Dr. Yeager had not actually denied that there was a possible causative connection between the VPCs and the sudden death of Christina, because in his report, Dr. Yeager had written that:

“It is impossible to know the role, if any, of this patient’s ventricular ectopy in her subsequent sudden death … Nonetheless, I find it difficult to discount her prior history of ventricular arrhythmia in light of her subsequent death, and I am suspicious that more detailed evaluation would have revealed a concerning pattern of ectopy, but I am by no means certain of a direct association.”

Regarding a temporal relationship between the vaccination and the onset of an arrhythmia, the medical records had revealed that Christina’s health only deteriorated after she had received the HPV vaccination, Gardasil.

In fact, the first time that her symptoms were recorded was after she had received her first shot of Gardasil and, according to reports, her symptoms increased with each subsequent Gardasil vaccination.

Dr. Eldar concluded that:

  1. Christina Tarsell’s arrhythmia was not documented before her first Gardasil shot.

  2. The erroneous interpretation of the premature beats as PACs rather than VPCs made them seem of low clinical importance. If properly diagnosed, a more thorough medical investigation (including stress test and a Holter monitor) might have revealed a more significant type of arrhythmia. This theory is also alluded to by Dr. Yeager in his report.

  3. I have shown that RVOT VPCs with the characteristics found in the present case are capable of triggering fatal arrhythmias (either VF or polymorphic VT) in apparently healthy individuals.

In conclusion, I find it more likely than not that the RVOT VPCs were the trigger of the sudden death of Christina Tarsell.”

While both experts agreed on the type of arrhythmia that Christina had experienced, the question remained as to whether her arrhythmia was induced by vaccination, and if so, by what mechanism?

This was addressed in full by Emily’s other expert, immunologist Dr. Yehuda Schoenfeld, with supporting testimony from Dr. Eldar.

Further Evidence That Gardasil Caused Christina Tarsell’s Death

Dr. Schoenfeld first challenged an opinion that had been submitted by Dr. Yeager, that perhaps Christina had inherited an undetected hereditary arrhythmia syndrome.

Dr. Schoenfeld wrote:

On page 4, Dr. Yeager states his opinion that the most probable reason for Christina’s sudden death was an undetected hereditary (genetic) arrhythmogenic syndrome. He provides no evidence to support his view.”

Dr. Schoenfeld continued:

With all due respect, but beliefs do not constitute as evidence in a court of law. Moreover, if there was history of genetic arrhythmogenic syndrome in the Tarsell family, it would be obvious, as such genetic abnormalities manifested in sudden death of relatives. In other words, they do not remain hidden and Christina’s death, in such case, would not have been the first.”

Emily reported to the court, that there was no family history of arrhythmia, sudden deaths from arrhythmia, or indeed any other form of heart disease. She explained what happened as Dr. Schoenfeld presented his testimony:

Dr. Schoenfeld then addressed the biologically possible mechanism at the cellular level by which the vaccine could cause death. The process is called molecular mimicry and it happens when proteins in HPV vaccines share a similarity with one’s own protein. The antibodies induced by the vaccine get confused and direct their attack to one’s own proteins as well as the intended HPV target.

Dr. Schoenfeld discovered a research paper which showed that the L1HPV 16 protein in Gardasil was similar to the the L-type calcium channel receptor in the heart. In certain individuals, the body then mounts an immune response to both the L-1 protein and L-type calcium channel receptor resulting in cross-reactivity and an autoimmune response.”

She explained that:

In summarizing the mechanism, attorney Mark Sadaka reiterated what Dr. Schoenfeld had written. He stated that:

Autoantibodies bound to the L-type calcium channels in Christina’s heart making them dysfunctional resulting in an influx of calcium into the heart cells. The increased concentration of calcium in the heart cells caused her ventricular premature contractions which led to her death. After each additional Gardasil vaccination, more calcium entered the heart resulting in a worsening of her arrhythmia and ultimately her death.”

Dr. Schoenfeld’s proposed mechanism was further supported by Dr. Eldar, who stated that:

Based on my previous report (14/7/2014) and the report of Dr.Yeager, (23/4/2014) the death of Christina Tarsell was caused by fatal ventricular arrhythmia related to the RVOT VPCs recorded previously in 2 ECG tracings. Gardasil, by causing increased L-type Ca current (Prof. Shoenfeld’s supplemental report), may be implicated in causing the RVOT VPCs, which triggered the ventricular arrhythmia that caused the premature death of Christina Tarsell.”

Emily told us that:

The expert immunologist for the government was S. Michael Phillips, M.D., F.A.C.P, whose main argument was to refute a link between Chris’s death and Gardasil vaccination, based on epidemiology and was summarized and addressed by Dr. Schoenfeld, who stated:

On page 6, Dr. Phillips addresses the question regarding Gardasil, and whether this vaccine might have triggered the sudden unexpected death in Christina’s case. He comes to the conclusion that Gardasil can be excluded as a possible trigger because in his review of the relevant literature, Dr. Phillips found no evidence of an increased signal of such adverse events linked to Gardasil vaccination. He cites the fact that thus far, 100 million doses of Gardasil have been distributed worldwide and if there was a real risk of sudden deaths, vaccine surveillance safety programs would have picked it up by now. However, it should be noted that for any vaccine the number of doses that are eventually administered is much lower than the number of doses that are distributed. Thus, calculations based on the latter tend to underestimate the rate of vaccine-associated adverse events. Supporting this interpretation, it was previously shown that for any of the two HPV vaccines currently on the market, the reported rate of adverse reactions per 100,000 doses administered was very similar across different countries and approximately 7 times higher than that calculated from the number of distributed doses. Moreover, given that worldwide, vaccine surveillance programmes routinely rely on passive reporting, the rate of rare but nonetheless serious adverse events causally linked to HPV vaccination might have escaped detection. The fact again remains that a previously healthy young woman died from a cardiac arrest, less than 3 weeks following her 3rd dose of Gardasil, thus in clear temporal relationship with the administration of the vaccine. The analysis of U.S. VAERS data by Slade et al. shows that there were reports of sudden unexpected deaths following Gardasil and although the signal for sudden deaths was not significant, a notable proportion of these events were due to cardiac abnormalities and their temporal relationship with the HPV vaccine falls within the same time-frame as in Christina’s case (less than 3 weeks following vaccination).”” (emphasis added)

Dr. Shoenfeld concluded by summarising that the evidence presented over two days of testimony had satisfied all three prongs stipulated by the Court of Federal Claims to win a judgment: He stated that:

In conclusion, as I stated previously in my report, in Christina Tarsell’s case we have:

(1) a medically plausible mechanism of cause and effect showing that the vaccination could have caused the injury;

(2) a clear temporal relationship between vaccination and injury (3 weeks);

(3) previous precedents where the same vaccine caused the same type of injury and within the same timeframe [2] and finally;

(4) lack of any reasonable alternative causes that could explain her condition.

Therefore, it is more likely than not that Gardasil was the cause of the tragic death of Christina Tarsell.”

The evidence presented to the court from both of these experts was supported by reams of published, peer-reviewed papers, medical records, numerous expert reports, decades of experience and thousands of hours of work, and it appeared that the government had no alternative explanation for what had happened to Christina.

This made the experts’ evidence all the more compelling. Therefore, it would have been easy at this stage to presume that Emily and her team had met their burden of proof.

However, as Emily would soon discover, it would take more than two of the world’s leading experts armed with an arsenal of evidence to persuade the vaccine court’s Special Master that the HPV vaccine was responsible for Christina’s death.

Death from Gardasil Litigation Continues in the US Court of Federal Claims

Emily told us that:

Special Master Moran rendered a decision on February 16, 2016, a year and three months after the hearing. Astonishingly, he ruled against us by ignoring the evidence.”

Emily explained to us that:

In the Court of Federal Claims, when a decision by the Special Master is contested, the plaintiff can appeal to a higher authority.”

She told us that she and her team were appalled that Moran had ignored and misinterpreted important evidence and testimonies written by experts.

She stated that:

Attorney Sadaka filed an appeal on March 16, 2016, that was strongly critical of Special Master Moran for “egregious distortions” and judgments that were “arbitrary and capricious” and “deprived the petitioner of a fair hearing.” What happened next was precedent-setting.”

Emily explained that:

The case then went to a judge and was assigned to Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. The judge reviewed all of the evidence and filed her decision on June 30, 2017, more than a year after receiving the case. The Judge wrote a 22-page critic of the ruling made by Special Master Moran. She cited instances where the Special Master had ignored critical evidence and made multiple errors of judgment and errors of law. Judge Coster Williams then  remanded the case back to Special Master Moran and directed him to consider all of the evidence and the rules of law in the “vaccine court.””

In Judge Coster Williams’ report [4], she made her views on the Tarsell case perfectly clear. One of the key points of contention was whether or not Christina’s arrhythmia had existed prior to her receiving the vaccination.

In his ruling, the Special Master had stated that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate that the arrhythmia had not existed before the vaccination, and he had appeared to have ignored all the evidence that the Tarsell family had submitted.

In her report, Judge Coster Williams stated:

“… the Special Master ignored medical record evidence from Christina’s treating physicians that showed she did not have arrhythmia prior to her vaccine.”

On page 21 of her extremely thorough report, Judge Coster Williams concluded that:

Petitioner’s motion for review is GRANTED. The Special Master’s decision denying compensation is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the Special Master for further proceedings consistent with this decision. The Court makes no factual findings of its own.

On remand the Special Master shall reassess whether Petitioner met Althen’s Prongs One, Two and Three and whether she is entitled to compensation, consistent with the legal principles articulated in this opinion.”

Emily explained that:

The truth is that all experts agreed that Christina died from an arrhythmia and her 20-year medical history was extensively reviewed by Judge Coster Williams, who cited 30 specific medical appointments which show that arrhythmia was not reported prior to vaccination (tabulated on page 22 of the Judge’s report).”

Secondly, the Judge determined that we had met our burden of proof regarding a “biologically plausible” theory causally connecting the vaccination with the injury. “Biologically plausible” is the legal standard in the vaccine court.

Thirdly, the Judge also instructed the Special Master to consider the evidence for Challenge-Rechallenge which he had ignored. In short, on remand, the SM was instructed to “consider all evidence on a logical sequence of cause and effect linking Gardasil and Christina’s death.”

On remand, the Special Master Moran followed the legal directives which led him to reverse his decision. He then ruled that we had indeed met our burden of proof for the court of Federal Claims and were entitled to compensation.”

Special Master Moran’s second and final ruling was filed on September 25, 2017. He wrote:

The undersigned finds that the challenge-rechallenge evidence is sufficiently probative that this presentation carries Ms. Tarsell’s burden of proof.”

He continued that:

Ultimately, because of the finding that Christina began to experience arrhythmia after her HPV vaccination, Ms. Tarsell has presented preponderant evidence of a logical sequence of cause and effect, connecting the HPV vaccination to the ensuing arrhythmia.”

He concluded:

The Court’s Opinion and Order required additional consideration consistent with the legal principles articulated by the Court for analyzing the evidence in this tragic case about a woman, Christina Tarsell, who died much too young. Under the approach dictated by the Court, Ms. Tarsell is entitled to compensation. The parties should anticipate that a separate order regarding damages will issue shortly.”

Emily explained how she felt after the Special Master had made his final decision:

The first sense of justice, joy and relief came when Judge Coster Williams considered our evidence and validated our appeal. That was just awesome and restored my faith in the legal process. We anticipated at that point that the Special Master would reverse his decision since he was basically over ruled by a higher authority. However, there was still one more hurdle before we could declare victory. The government had a window of opportunity to appeal the final decision by the Special Master. It is very telling that the government did not appeal the final decision. Their opportunity to appeal expired on March 30, 2018, eight years after the case was filed. By not appealing, the government (HHS) thereby conceded that we had proved by preponderance of evidence that Gardasil vaccinations killed Christina.

Speaking of a higher authority, from the moment I realized that Gardasil killed Chris, I felt that I was summoned by a Higher Consciousness for a mission on behalf of my daughter and others injured by the vaccine. Sometimes we don’t choose our battles; they choose us. This was before I had an attorney or experts and I had to trust that the path to truth would unfold.

Amazingly, the right people, the right attorney, the right science and scientists, and the right judge all coalesced for the truth to prevail. So the victory was also a validation of my faith.

It has been difficult. In addition to loosing my only child whom I loved with all of my heart, I have been viciously attacked on media and even privately, quietly dismissed by some from whom I expected support. So having the truth validated by the legal system is a big crack in the wall of denial regarding Gardasil-induced injuries and death.

There are those who will try to cover up or minimize the crack or distract you with lies and bribes for their own selfish or naive reasons. So, the “battle” is not over ,but our victory is precedent-setting because it is the first Gardasil death case to win a judgment.

My heart goes out to all of the thousands of families whose beautiful children have died or been seriously injured by HPV vaccinations. Some cases have prevailed in the vaccine court in the US and in other courts across the world. But most people don’t know about their legal options or learn too late after the statute of limitations had expired. Others are blocked from justice by the barriers of discovery and other systemic impediments.

I feel gratitude that Chris’s Gardasil-induced death case was not just swept under the carpet. Her favorite sport was baseball and with her win, she has scored a huge home run. I’m still on deck and ready to go to bat to save lives.”

Through dogged determination, perseverance, blood, sweat and tears and with truth on their side, Emily and her exceptional team, Attorney Sadaka, Dr. Eldar and Dr. Schoenfeld, prevailed.

This case was never about financial gain. They knew Emily would not settle. This case was always about getting justice for Christina and holding the government accountable for HPV vaccine deaths and injuries.

Christina is sadly just one of a growing number of individuals who have lost their lives after receiving a vaccine that has been deemed safe and effective by governments from around the world. By proving with preponderance of evidence that this vaccine was responsible for Christina’s death, Ms. Tarsell has paved the way for others to get the justice they deserve.

We would like to thank Ms. Tarsell for her bravery, for allowing us to read her daughter’s reports and for agreeing to participate in this book.

••••

References

  1. World Health Organisation (WHO) VigiAccess database. Accessed August 13, 2018. Available here

  2. Lyons-Weller, James. Who and What Killed Christina Tarsell # NotOneMore. Mercury Project. 2018. Available here

  3. Human Resources and Services Administration. National Injury Compensation Progam, Official Website. Available here

  4. Coster Williams, Mary Ellen, Judge. United States Court of Federal Claims. June 2017. Available here

  5. Moran, Christian J. Special Master. United States Court of Federal Claims. September 2017. Available here

••••

US Federal Court Rules Death Caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 1)

••••

Read more articles by Christina England

••••

Note from Christina:

Arlo was rescued from Romania when he was just six months old, after being born with deformed front legs and dumped outside a railway station.

I have been fostering him for the past year and after a massive fundraising effort, have raised enough money to have surgery to straighten his left leg and fuse his wrist.

This surgery was performed last week and was a great success. However, this has left him lopsided and he now needs similar surgery on his right leg.

Please donate anything that you can to help this darling little boy to stand tall and walk on all four legs for the first time. Thank you.

Please consider donating through my fundraiser, where you can see more of his story.

Or through my PayPal christina128@live.co.uk

Thank you.

••••

About the Author: Christina England, BA Hons, Research Journalist and Author

Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. She left school to work in a children’s library, specialising in storytelling and book buying. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980.

After taking an A Level in Psychology and a BTEC in Learning Support, Ms. England spent many years researching vaccines and adverse reactions. She gained a Higher National Diploma in Journalism and Media Studies in 2010 and in 2016 she gained a BA Hons degree in Literature and Humanities. She currently writes for VacTruth, Health Impact News, GreenMedInfo, The Liberty Beacon, Vaccine Impact and Medical Kidnap on immunisation safety and efficacy.

She has co-authored the book – Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis – Are Parents Being Falsely Accused? with Dr. Harold Buttram and Vaccination Policy and the UK Government: The Untold Truth with Lucija Tomljenovic PhD, which are sold on Amazon. She also compiled the book Shattered Dreams: The HPV Vaccine Exposed

Her website is Parents and Carers Against Medical Injustice

••••

Click on image below to visit site:

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

Eagle’s Eye Report: Big Pharma & Child Abuse

Eagle’s Eye Report: Big Pharma & Child Abuse


Eagle’s Eye Report: Big Pharma & Child Abuse (Archived)

90 Minute Special

Host: Roger Landry (TLB) – Co-Host & Producer: Stephen Roberts

Brought to you by: TLBTalk.com – Where Freedom Roars

Live Broadcast platform: ShakeAndWake Radio Network

Also on PSN Radio and SoFloRadio live.

Listen to Archived Show below intro article

See appropriate links below Archived Show

Intro by: Roger Landry (TLB)

Welcome again to Episode #9 of the Eagle’s Eye Report. Hosted by myself, Roger Landry (TLB), and Co-Hosted and Produced by my good friend and fellow patriot – Stephen Roberts. The title of today’s show is … Big Pharma & Child Abuse. The mission of this show is to be a mechanism for communicating the truth and facts in a country increasingly forbidding of these very concepts.

No, as I say weekly, this not a pleasant way to introduce a show … but today reality is blatant and not very pleasant in many aspects. Thus the reason, and intent behind the Eagle’s Eye Report.

Our mission is to keep you armed with the vital truth, as well as to present you with a platform where you can discuss these vital issues without fear of censorship or exclusion, that being the sponsor of this show … TLBTalk.com.

Now it’s down to business …

••••

Big Pharma & Child Abuse

If ever we are approached by danger or violence on just about any level, who is the first to be protected, to be hustled off to a safe area, or to be worried over with the utmost attention and focus? That would of-course be any children present, be they ours or not. For most normal adults this is very close to an instinctive action, being so close to automatic that it is difficult to even remember any forethought involved …

DANGER = PROTECT THE CHILDREN !!!

and for the most part (98% or better) we do! If a child is playing in the street and a car suddenly turns the corner and is bearing down on on them at a speed that leaves said child frozen in fear, a vast majority of adults would (almost) instinctively rush out into the street to push the child out of the path of the onrushing vehicle … even at the probable expense of their own safety or life. To any sane adult our children are the most precious asset, and the very future of, humanity, so to act in any other fashion is not really acceptable as a societal or a personal norm.

Yet today we will discuss an entity, mainly trusted by a very large portion of humanity, that not only totally disregards this premise … but specifically and knowingly puts our very youngest (babies) and toddlers in harms way as a matter of business and profit. Yes this is done knowingly and with foreknowledge by being the original source of the research clearly stating that these very actions are harmful and quite possibly even deadly to our babies/children.

No I am not exaggerating or pushing fear porn to make a personal point or to grandstand a situation that does not warrant it. As a matter of fact, if anything my pulpit is not high enough, nor is my bullhorn loud enough !!!

So let’s dig into this massive and unforgivable tyranny …

This episode is based on an article published by Dr. Mercola titled: Why Big Pharma Is Desperate to Get COVID Jab Into Babies. Yes that is the actual title and I’m sure you may now have a clearer understanding of why I chose this article to base this show on. As usual my commentary, opinion, and understandings are also a part of this presentation.

Let’s start this with a couple of slaps of reality:

Statistics show the rate of COVID associated hospitalization among children aged 5 to 11 is 0.0008%. Deaths are even more rare! In real-world terms, that’s so close to zero you basically cannot lower it any further. Yet, despite such reassuring data, children in this age group are urged to get two to three doses of the COVID jab, even though side effects of the injection could harm them for life, or kill them. In other words … it is a FACT that the supposed cure is far more dangerous to these children than the disease would ever be …

••••

As if the situation were not blatant enough already, June 15, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s vaccine advisory panel — the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) — unanimously approved (21-0) to grant Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID shots for infants and young children.

••••

Dr. Clare Craig, a diagnostic pathologist, points out that of the 4,526 children, aged 6 months to 4 years, who participated in Pfizer’s trial, 3,000 didn’t make it to the end of the trial. Why did two-thirds of the children drop out? Oftentimes, this happens when side effects are too severe for the participant to continue. Here, we don’t know why two-thirds of the participants were eliminated, and “on that basis alone, this trial should be deemed null and void …

••••

As noted by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, vaccinating infants and children who have no need for the shots and don’t benefit from them, just to “protect” adults, violates medical ethics. And since those who are jabbed still readily transmit the virus, the children are actually put at risk for no reason at all.

••••

Big Pharma needs this last remaining age group to be included (infants and toddlers) under the EUA, because once the emergency is finally declared ‘over,’ the next phase of liability shielding requires that the shots receive approval by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

Once the vaccine is on the childhood vaccination schedule, the vaccine makers are permanently shielded from liability for injuries and deaths that occur in ANY age group, including adults.

••••

So fasten your seat-belt and – Listen Up …

••••

Eagle’s Eye Report: Big Pharma & Child Abuse (Archived)

(Click on image below to listen to show)

SO BIG PHARMA WILL “KNOWINGLY” MAIM AND KILL OUR CHILDREN IN ORDER TO PROTECT THEIR PROFITS AND PREVENT CORPORATE LIABILITIES … OR … GENOCIDE ANYONE ???

••••

Show Talking Points from the following article:

The Reason Big Pharma Is Desperate to Get the Jab Into Babies

••••

Related article/video:

Dr. Rima Laibow – DEVASTATING! 90% of the Global Population Will Die – Globalist Agenda

••••

More Episodes of Eagle’s Eye Report (click on image below)

••••

About the Articles Author Roger Landry (TLB) spent about three decades of his adult life either in, or working for the military, with about two decades working directly for the Military Industrial Complex facilitating DOD contracts. His awakening to Political, Economic, and Health realities was about twelve short years ago. Since that time he has founded The Liberty Beacon Project (TLB) consisting of a half dozen proprietary global websites, media projects and partner websites across the planet. He contributes regularly to multiple forums both in and outside of TLB Project. Most of his work can be found on the TLB Flagship website TheLibertyBeacon.com

Image credit: Image of Joe Biden & Kamala Harris, In Public Domain – All other image credits on articles linked above.

••••

Click on the image below to visit/join our sponsors site:

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

The Best Takedown of the CDC’s ‘Politicized’ C-19 Response That You’ll Ever See

The Best Takedown of the CDC’s ‘Politicized’ C-19 Response That You’ll Ever See


 The Best Takedown of the CDC’s ‘Politicized’ Covid Response That You’ll Ever See

Becker News

Dr. Robert Malone delivered the most sensible, credible and powerful criticism of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s ‘politicized’ response to Covid out there.

“I’m honored to be here,” Dr. Malone said. “I’m here on a voluntary basis at the request of the committee. My name is Robert Wallace Malone. I’m a physician licensed in Maryland at graduate of UC Davis, UC San Diego, University of Maryland and Northwestern University, as well as Harvard for a fellowship in clinical research.”

“I spent my career working in the field of medicine, particularly in vaccine technology and biodefense,” he went on. “I am a vaccinologist. Earlier in my career, I had a series of discoveries when I was at the Salk Institute that led to nine issued patents filed approximately 1989 to 1990, that are considered by most to be the foundation technology upon which the mRNA vaccines have been built. There have been additional advances since then. I don’t take credit and I did not in any way claim to have invented these vaccines. Just wanted to get that out.”

“I’m a specialist in clinical research, medical affairs, regulatory affairs, project management, proposal management, particularly large federal grants and contracts, vaccines, and biodefense,” Dr. Malone added. “I’ve won well over 2 billion in grants and contracts. I often chair or in the past have chaired study sections for large vaccine grants and contracts for the NIAID. I’ve met Tony Fauci multiple times.”

“I am a deep specialist in government affairs, particularly in the vaccines and biodefense space,” he continued. “I particularly work with the defense threat reduction agency historically, so a branch of the Department of Defense focused on bio defense.”

“I’m here to talk to you about the policies relating to vaccines in early treatment for SARS-CoV-2 through the various surges and my thoughts and recommendations for future public health events as the committee has requested that I do,” Dr. Malone said. “I’ll do so to the best of my ability in speaking plainly. I hope that nothing I say will offend. That’s not my intention and I’m certainly not here to point fingers or to cause rifts or conflict in terms of my own experience.”

“I’ve been deeply involved in multiple prior outbreak responses, including AIDS,” he continued. “The post anthrax and smallpox scare actually did a lot of the due diligence for the smallpox vaccine products for the Department of Defense and their adverse events. I’m deeply experienced in influenza, vaccine development, Ebola, Zika, and now SARS-CoV-2. I’ve been working nonstop on SARS-CoV-2 since I got a phone call from Wuhan, from a member of the intelligence community on January 2nd, 2020.”

“During prior outbreaks, in my experience, CDC served as a reliable source of impartial, up-to-date, and accurate public health data for physicians, state, and local local public health officials,” Dr. Malone said. “Prior to SARS-CoV-2, the teaching and practice in governmental response has been that the federal CDC advises state public health authorities who have the authority and responsibility, according to the U.S. Constitution, to manage their own public health policies and regulate the practice of medicine. This is your responsibility.”

“And up until the present, that’s always been acknowledged,” he added. “The role of the federal government is in consultation and support and advice. This approach has not been implemented during the COVID crisis, as we’ve been discussing during SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 outbreak, new policies and practices have been implemented the NIH and particularly NIAID have developed propagated treatment protocols throughout the United States.”

“In most cases, the protocols developed by the NIH have been developed in a non-transparent manner without hearings or significant public comment by independent physicians, practicing physicians,” Dr. Malone said. “Apparently these have been developed largely under the strong influence and oversight of a small number of government officials, predominantly Dr. Fauci and his former trainee, Dr. Birx, particularly under the prior administration.”

“Development of vaccine products have been accelerated in historic nonclinical, clinical development and regulatory practices have been discarded in a quest for speed under specific pressure from the executive branch in the prior administration,” he added. “Development of repurposed drugs and treatment strategies have paradoxically been aggressively blocked or inhibited by both NIH and FDA. Apparently due to requirements in the federal Emergency Use Authorization statute language, requiring lack of available alternatives as a predicate to granting emergency use authorization to a new product, including a vaccine product. In this case with this outbreak, the CDC has played a more supportive role to NIH, in contrast to prior where NIH/NIAID has focused on clinical research and early product development and the CDC is focused on public health policy.”

“We know according to the New York Times article on President’s Day, that the CDC has become politicized, particularly during the current administration, and has actively withheld information, which has been deemed as posing risk for exacerbating vaccine hesitancy during the current outbreak,” Malone said. “The CDC has not fulfilled its traditional role as a neutral collector arbiter and reporter of public health data. CDC has, under FOIA, admitted to failing to perform obligated monitoring analysis and reporting of VAERS and related vaccine safety data.”

“We heard testimony earlier about the reliance of the state of Texas personnel on the evaluation of VAERS from the CDC,” he added. “And we now know that the CDC failed to perform their required tasks relating to VAES analysis assigned to them by Congress. As a consequence, neither patients, physicians nor public health officials have been able to assess up to date information concerning vaccine effectiveness and safety.”

“This has compromised the informed consent process,” he continued. “CDC has actively promoted in marketed vaccination with an unlicensed Emergency Use Authorized product with over $1 billion in U.S. federal funding, expanded to both market the products and to censor those who’ve raised concerns regarding vaccine safety and effectiveness. This is not an opinion. It is well-documented through Freedom of Information Act document disclosure.”

“FDA, NIH, and CDC together with World Health Organization have cooperated to actively restrict, demean, and deprecate the use of multiple currently available licensed drugs for treatment of COVID-19 by licensed practicing physicians, who are the ones who have the authority to establish local standard of care — not the CDC and not the NIAID. And have facilitated retaliation against physicians who did not follow the treatment guidelines established and promoted by the NIH. I was very glad to hear that is not happening with the hospital that was just testifying.”

“Historically, the NIH has neither mandate nor significant prior experience in developing and implementing universal treatment guidance and protocols and has done so in a unilateral manner without seeking meaningful input from practicing physicians,” he went on. “NIH leadership has acted to restrict and retaliate against highly qualified, independent physicians and medical scientists who question federal management policies. We know this most notably in the case of the Great Barrington Declaration, and the primary authors of that document. Again, Freedom of Information [Act], disclosures of emails, It’s incontrovertible.

“On a national basis without respect for state boundaries, this is key, or coordination with state governments, NIH and CDC have actively engaged with and directly paid corporate media and technology and social media companies to promote federal positions and policies, and to censor any discussions of policies, risks, adverse events, or treatment options, other those than those, which they have endorsed, again, multiple FOIA documents demonstrate this.” Dr. Malone said.

“There is evidence in the case of the State of Florida and Governor Ron DeSantis that the federal government has intentionally withheld monoclonal antibody therapeutics as political retaliation for COVID crisis management policies implemented by the State of Florida, which are not aligned with federal government policies and mandates,” Dr. Malone added. “Now in section three of the request from the committee, from my comment, they asked a series of questions relating to the effects of vaccines and the now remarkably enhanced reinfection rate in the United States population.”

“Those questions included some detailed, let’s say, ‘inside baseball’ questions, having to do with the nuance of nomenclature of effectiveness or efficacy, et cetera,” he noted. “I am going to pass over those unless there’s reasons for questions that are available to you in the document, in the interest of time.”

“During the COVID crisis, the use of the terms, ‘immunity’ and ‘effectiveness’ have been applied creatively by the NIH and CDC leadership,” he remarked. “First to refer to prevention of infection, replication, and spread. Then as those endpoints were not being met by the vaccines to prevention from hospitalization and death. Then as those endpoints were only partially achievable to a relative reduction in hospitalization and death, which currently, based on the latest peer review data, is in the range of between 30 and 60% of fully vaccinated persons in high-risk categories are still at risk of hospitalization and death.”

This testimony before the Texas State Senate is the serious and rigorous criticism of the federal government’s Covid response that the American people need to hear.

*********

(TLB) published this video/article from Backer News as compiled and written by Kyle Becker

Header featured image (edited) cretit: Dr. Malone/theepochtimes.com/dr-robert-malone

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)