Daniel Andrews is SCARED to Show His Face

Daniel Andrews is SCARED to Show His Face

By Avi Yemini

Labor is HIDING Daniel Andrews from potential voters in Mulgrave, not even printing his face on billboards, as Ian Cook grows in popularity, potentially UNSEATING the premier after 20 years. They’ve sent his “best” volunteers instead.

Here’s what others had to say:

rick Y
Politicians need to be thoroughly investigated to see who owns them..
National security risk most of them.

Josh Woods
Although I’m an ex-immigrant who lived in SA(Feb 2016-March 2021) who happens to be ethnically Chinese(but don’t support the CCP at all as a British-American), there would’ve been no way in hell I’d vote for Dan if I was eligible to vote as I’ve come to deeply despise his narcissism and authoritarianism, and I have always been strongly anti-lockdown+mandate for humanitarian reasons. Go Ian Cook!!

Aldo Raine
Imagine wanting to be leader of a Country that you’re frightened to walk around freely… the man’s a disgrace…

Ralph Rotten
Labor seems to really have a lot of Chinese supporters, I wonder why.

Jonathan
What do you expect from a communist dictator. No Dan no show. Dan lost his dignity the moment he treated Victoria like a dictatorship.

Viv Rowe
Come on Ian, you have been through hell. Andrews hurt you terribly, closing your business.

Sean Delap
It says a lot that Dan Andrews has not shown his face in public unlike the other candidates.

Martin Wolrich
Thankyou Avi for your work & heritage.I’m Aussie & I support your job on reporting all the corruption in our world.100%.We need you up in Sydney as well.Martin

Luke Kent
Anyone still supporting Andrews at this time has obviously had a labotomy and is happy to see him continue to destroy the state.

Rebecca Dunbar
As a result of Daniels Andrews decisions around health I had the unfortunate experience of battling stage 4 metastatic cancer over the last 18 months. I have arrived at the hospital on multiple occasions via an ambulance only to be treated and administered meds in cold hallways as there were no beds! I was cold and alone without family or friends able to be with me fighting for my life in the cold hallway of the understaffed hospital.
He has done nothing to help our broken health system in light of a world wide pandemic which he deemed so serious he had to lock us up longer than any other city in the entire world ! Nonsensical

Mad Cow Mark
Cookie got it right, I grew up on Labor values but the values have changed, I remember watching a story of Avi’s about on how the leaders of both main parties were supporters of open boarders Turnball and Shorten, lucky one forced into resignation and the other didn’t win the election.
I was a Union delegate many years ago and I remember the Labor government telling union’s to support illegal immigrants.
I didn’t want to support illegal immigration, I support immigration and immigrants, just look at America know.
Bill Shorten and Micheal Turnball both were supported by George Soros and possibly still are!

Freda Rounthwaite
Well done Avi. Another cracking view of the state of Australian gov’t. I hope and pray there is no hanky spanky at the voting poll stations. Everyone knows if thing are done fairly, Andrew won’t get a look in. Go Australia!

Natalie Hilton
I’m sure Dan will be devastated just like the other former politicians who have moved on into well paid positions with no consequences. He won’t lose any sleep over the damage left behind. How many times do we have to keep playing this same game over and over til there’s a complete overhaul and upgrade?

Source

Are Health Practitioners Covered for Indemnity Insurance re the COVID Jabs?

Are Health Practitioners Covered for Indemnity Insurance re the COVID Jabs?

All,
Another missile of a message from vax campaigner, Elizabeth Hart, in Australia.
This has all the appearance of the government throwing medical staff under the bus on liability & requirements for informed consent.
A most peculiar course of action, they’d struggle to again lean on doctors & nurses in “the next pandemic” that we are impliedly promised is coming.
Please review & share widely, especially if you have any healthcare staff in your networks.

Best wishes & thanks
Mike

For the attention of:
Mark Butler
Minister for Health and Aged Care
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care

Mark Butler, it appears that health practitioners have been misled by the former Morrison Government into believing they are covered by a specific government medical indemnity scheme for administering Covid-19 jabs, as it has now been confirmed by your department that health practitioners are not covered by a specific Covid-19 government medical indemnity scheme.

In his response to my previous emails to you (see below), Nigel Murray, Assistant Secretary, MBS Policy and Specialist Services Branch says:
I can advise that rather than putting in place a medical indemnity scheme for health professionals, the former Government established the no-fault Scheme, which commenced operations on 13 December 2021.
and
While a medical indemnity scheme for health professionals administering the COVID-19 vaccine was not established per se, the creation of the no-fault Scheme was intended to support increased participation by health professionals in the COVID-19 Vaccination roll-out.

But the promise of “a medical indemnity scheme for health professionals administering the COVID-19 vaccine” probably did intend “to support increased participation by health professionals in the COVID-19 Vaccination roll-out”.

In July 2021, the Morrison Government stated it was establishing a “fit-for-purpose COVID-19 vaccine medical indemnity scheme” to “support increased vaccination uptake by assuring Australians that health professionals, including GPs, nurses and pharmacists administering COVID vaccines as part of the Commonwealth vaccination program have appropriate indemnity coverage”, with a further announcement in August 2021 stating “The Morrison Government has finalised the details of the no fault COVID-19 Vaccine Claim Scheme following extensive consultation with the peak medical, healthcare, business and insurance sectors to ensure a comprehensive National Scheme”, noting “It also ensure [sic] that health professionals administering vaccines will be able to continue with their crucial role in the vaccine roll out with the assurance that the claims scheme will offer them protection”.

But it now turns out health professionals are not personally protected by a specific Covid-19 medical indemnity scheme.

The letter from Nigel Murray also confirms: “Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations.” Mark Butler, it appears health practitioners don’t have specific government medical indemnity regarding the Covid jab rollout, although they might think they do. They will have to look to their own medical indemnity insurance to protect them. And they should be obtaining informed consent for every Covid-19 jab…but is this actually happening?

What is the quality of information being provided to people, including parents of children, to enable them to properly evaluate the threat of SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19, and the risks and benefits of the multiple Covid jabs, in their own specific circumstances? Why are people of most ages and health statuses being called upon to have the Covid-19 jabs? Who is actually at serious risk with SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19? Does having repeated Covid jabs compromise the immune system and make people more vulnerable?

Nigel Murray includes a reference to the COVID-19 vaccination – Patient resources webpage in his letter, but this webpage only includes information re Covid jabs for children, not for adults. Nigel Murray’s letter also includes a link to a Consent form for COVID-19 vaccination.

How does this information re Covid jabs referred to by Nigel Murray stack up in the ‘valid informed consent’ stakes? I would say not very well at all…

This is an extremely serious situation Mark Butler – it’s highly likely ‘valid informed consent’ has not been properly obtained by many health practitioners before administering Covid-19 jabs.

The health practitioners inserting the needle must be warned they’re not protected by a specific government Covid medical indemnity scheme after all…and they need to consider the quality of the information they’re providing to people to gain their ‘valid informed consent’ to the jabs. They must also consider the impact of jab mandates – which pressure, coerce and manipulate people to submit to Covid jabs, in contravention of The Australian Immunisation Handbook, i.e. jab mandates inhibit a ‘voluntary’ decision.

Mark Butler, please advise what steps you are taking to address this matter.

This email is being circulated to other parties, including the response from your department.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy

—————————————————–

For the attention of:
Mark Butler
Minister for Health and Aged Care
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care

Mark Butler, are health practitioners covered by indemnity insurance if they fail to obtain valid informed consent before administering Covid jabs?

I have raised this matter previously with you in my emails dated 4 October 2022 and 7 October 2022.

Emma McArthur has also previously sought clarification on this matter in her email dated 11 November 2021 to Greg Hunt, then Minister for Health and Aged Care, in which she asked:

Please could you advise to what extent the Commonwealth Covid-19 vaccine claims scheme provides insurance and indemnity for the civil and criminal liability that would arise where the battery
and clinical negligence occurs due to a failure to obtain valid informed consent? Please could you also provide the terms and conditions for this scheme?

Emma McArthur received a response to her queries from Louise Morgan, Acting Assistant Secretary, COVID-19 Vaccine Claims Scheme Taskforce, Medical Benefits Division, dated 21 December 2021.

The response from Louise Morgan notes the COVID-19 Vaccine Claims Scheme opened to potential claimants on 13 December 2021, and “has been established as a fit-for-purpose, time-limited claims scheme to respond to the unprecedented circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic”.

Louise Morgan also notes:

The Scheme does not provide an indemnity for practitioners or insurers, it does however provide patients who have suffered one of the eligible clinical conditions or an administration injury as a direct result
of a COVID-19 vaccine, with faster access to compensation rather than a costly and complex court process.

I can advise that informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations.

(My emphasis.)

Mark Butler, according to Louise Morgan, it appears there is no indemnity for practitioners or insurers…and that informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent
procedures for other vaccinations. In her response, Louise Morgan also referred to the Australian Immunisation Handbook, “which has information about ‘valid consent, including criteria for consent to be legally valid…”

This is a very interesting response from Louise Morgan, because, in July 2021, Greg Hunt announced that the Morrison Government was establishing a “fit-for-purpose COVID-19 vaccine medical indemnity scheme” to
“support increased vaccination uptake by assuring Australians that health professionals, including GPs, nurses, and pharmacists administering COVID vaccines as part of the Commonwealth vaccination program
have appropriate indemnity coverage”. (Media release: COVID-19 indemnity scheme to protect health professionals and patients, see copy attached.)

The media release notes “The scheme will support claims made against privately practicing health professionals who administer a COVID-19 vaccine approved for use by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)”.

A further media release published on 28 August 2021 states: “The Morrison Government has finalized the details of the no-fault COVID-19 Vaccine Claim Scheme following extensive consultation with the peak medical, healthcare, business, and insurance sectors to ensure a comprehensive National Scheme”.

The media release notes “It also ensures [sic] that health professionals administering vaccines will be able to continue with their crucial role in the vaccine roll out with the assurance that the claims scheme will offer them protection.”

To summarise, in July 2021, Greg Hunt announced health professionals, including GPs, nurses, and pharmacists administering COVID vaccines as part of the Commonwealth vaccination program would have appropriate indemnity coverage, and the media release published in August 2021 appears to confirm this.

But the letter to Emma McArthur from Louise Morgan dated 21 December 2021 clearly states there is no indemnity for practitioners or insurers…and that informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19
vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations.

So far, I haven’t found a media release refuting the announcements of indemnity protection for health practitioners.

Again Mark Butler, I ask you to clarify this matter – are health practitioners such as GPs, nurses and pharmacists covered by indemnity insurance if they fail to obtain informed consent before the Covid jabs?

I request your early response.

Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy

————————————————

For the attention of:
Peter Malinauskas
Leader of the SA Labor Party
Premier of South Australia

Peter Malinauskas, re my previous email to you: Are SA Health practitioners covered for indemnity insurance regarding the Covid jabs? 14 November 2022.

FYI, please see below my recent email to federal health minister Mark Butler, which includes a reference to a response from his department.

Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy

————————————————

Resources:
https://t.me/robinmg/24772
https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/11/response-re_-are-health-practitioners-covered-for-indemnity-insurance-re-the-covid-jabs-.pdf

Source

EPIC The Real Aussie Spirit Book

EPIC The Real Aussie Spirit Book

By Dave Oneegs Aussie Chat

Be Epic – the book.
Aussie History immortalised.
$60 plus postage on www.epicthebook.com.au
Use promo code ONEEGS for a $5 saving for our community.

Best Christmas gift ever!

Order now to avoid disappointment.
Only 1000 copies are available.

Thanks to Sam Beau Patrick The Health Queen for all your hard work capturing our history and Aussie spirit

Source

The Type of No Bs Talk Australia Needs From Its Leaders, But Won’t Get Until we Achieve a Political Revolution

The Type of No BS Talk Australia Needs From Its Leaders, But Won’t Get Until we Achieve a Political Revolution

Episode 7 – Jamie Mcintyre

The type of no Bs talk Australia needs from its leaders, but won’t get until we achieve a political revolution.

Jamie is back with us again from the European Union.

Always have a good chat with him and this week is no exception.

This week we discuss

Experts come to their senses finally &  rule out 3rd Covid Booster doses for Australians

Both Victorian majors promise to spend more money they don’t have…  Even after being rated by the S&P as the poorest fiscal health in 40 years

Australian bureau of statistics releases alarming numbers on live births in Australia. Is there cause for concern??

Democrat re-elected by a landslide in Pennsylvania – even though he’s dead, and no, it’s not Joe Biden.

Decentralised Digital ID being bought in by the Australian Government.

 

Resources:
https://t.me/jamiemcintyre/6475
https://www.standupnowaustralia.com.au/stand-up-sits-down-podcast/episode-7-jamie-mcintyre

Source

New G20 Agenda 2030 Document calls for Global Vaccine Passports

New G20 Agenda 2030 Document calls for Global Vaccine Passports

By The Expose

G-20 leaders have adopted a joint declaration calling for the establishment of “global digital health networks” that build on existing digital COVID-19 vaccine passports.

The G20 is officially over, and in doing so the G20 has put out a PDF document named – “2022 G20 Bali Update on the G20 Action Plan on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and G20 Development Commitments.”

This document tracks the progress and status of active G20 development commitments. In addition to ensuring accountability and transparency, the Bali Update also helps future G20 presidencies optimize the G20’s contribution to SDGs and G20 development commitments.

What’s in it? From page 38:

In the section Collective and Concrete Actions by Working Groups and Workstreams Contributing to the Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, specifically under SDS Global Health, the following passage can be found:

“Acknowledge the importance of shared technical standards to facilitate seamless international travel, interoperability, and recognizing digital and non-digital solutions aligned with countries’ relevant legal provisions including those used for COVID-19 proof of vaccination or verification of tests as well as the IHR (2005) which provides an overarching legal framework for addressing public health emergencies that have the potential to cross borders”

There’s more…

“Endeavour to move towards interoperability of systems including mechanisms that validate proof of vaccination, whilst respecting the sovereignty of national health policies, and relevant national regulations such as personal data protection and data-sharing.

And also…

“Acknowledge that continued global cooperation is necessary to build trust between countries. Support continued international dialogue and collaboration on the establishment of trusted global digital health networks as part of efforts to strengthen prevention and response to future pandemics.”

“Further steps should capitalize and build on the success of the existing standards and digital COVID19 certificates.”

To capitalise and build on existing vaccination passports for future pandemics?

They are unwilling to let this slide even though the COVID vaccines were never tested to prevent transmission. This was revealed in the EU Parliament last month by MEP Rob Roos.

Finally on page 12 under Scaling-up Financing for Sustainable Development it mentions:

“Discuss the drivers of currency usage in trade and finance as well as developing local currency capital markets and discuss the macro-financial implications of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) for the international monetary and financial system.”

It’s all about the globalist agenda, people. Agenda 2030 is that agenda. The globalists are using climate change, war, and COVID to create a digital hell on earth.

During one of the summits, we had Indonesian Health Minister Budi Gunadi Sadikin state the following:

“Let’s have a digital health certificate acknowledged by WHO. If you have been vaccinated or tested, you can move around. So, for the next pandemic, instead of stopping the movement of the people one hundred percent, which [collapsed] the economy globally, you can still provide some movement of the people.”

This G20 recommendation also conveniently synchronises with the EU vaccine roadmap which also states for 2022 and beyond that the “Commission proposal for a common vaccination card/passport for EU citizens – considered delivered in the format of Commission proposal for Regulation on the European Health Data Space:” And to “Develop guidance to overcome the legal and technical barriers impeding the interoperability of national immunisation information systems.

Klaus Schwab announced at the B20, an offshoot of the main G20, that this world must undergo deep and systemic restructuring.

He’s talking about restructuring and transitioning to achieve their sustainable dystopia agenda, which means a highly controlled society under the name of net zero.

The globalists aren’t hiding their agenda anymore: For the “privilege” of traveling, they want everyone to show their “digital papers” and submit to an all-powerful digital id system.

Without the digital identity system on your phone, you can’t leave your house. There’s a chance they’ll only let you go to the grocery store or the pharmacy.

Once we have a CBDC, it’ll be even easier to enforce. Once you go outside your pre-approved radius of movement, your money stops working.

Source

What do Ordinary Australians Think of the Conflict?

What do Ordinary Australians Think of the Conflict?

By AussieCossack

What do ordinary Australians think of the conflict?

“Pro-Russian sentiments are present in Australia among ordinary people. It’s only the politicians who do the will of their American patrons, spreading anti-Russian ideology. The people are not against Russia. President Vladimir Putin is very popular, by the way, in Australia, and in general, Russians are respected.

I think that anti-Russian hysteria is beneficial to the United States, and England, to keep Australia in fear. Australia depends, of course, on this system. And it is very sad that she sends military aid, and weapons in favor of the Ukrainian fascists in Kyiv.

Australian taxpayers, of course, are unhappy that the Australian money goes there. It’s a very unpopular policy of the Australian state.

A typical Aussie in relation to a special military operation says: “Australia doesn’t have a dog in this fight”, which means: “Australia has nothing to do with it,” we should not interfere and should not participate. People understand that there is no interest for Australia here, and Russia does not threaten it in any way,” said AussieCossack.

Source

Did the Globalists Work George Soros, Via the Democrats, Rig the US Mid-Terms, Just Like they did the 2020 US Election?

Did the Globalists Work George Soros, Via the Democrats, Rig the US Mid-Terms, Just Like they did the 2020 US Election?

Source

Australian National Review Founder Says, “I’ve offered a $1 Million Challenge Before re Shane Warne’s Death, and I’ll offer It Again to any Australian that Wants to bet their House that Shane Warne didn’t Die from the Bs 19 Deadly Jabs

Australian National Review Founder Says, “I’ve offered a $1 Million Challenge Before re Shane Warne’s Death, and I’ll offer It Again to any Australian that Wants to bet their House that Shane Warne didn’t Die from the Bs 19 Deadly Jabs

Australian National Review Founder says, “I’ve offered a $1 million challenge before re Shane Warne’s death, and I’ll offer it again to any Australian that wants to bet their house that Shane Warne didn’t die from the Bs 19 deadly jabs.
I mean, he died within days of his third dose, and the mainstream media expected us to believe it was those deadly juice fasts he was doing in Thailand.
You know those experimental juice fasts that were never safe, effective or necessary that are killing one Australian every 15-30 minutes since Jan 1st, 2022, (according to Government excess mortality since the start of the year – yet no excess deaths during the supposed Global pandemic that never was) and every 4-8 seconds globally, from heart attacks, etc.
Just because the juice fast industry, pays the mainstream media and Government shills, to cover up the death and injuries, doesn’t mean the deaths are rare. They pay them to rarely report them perhaps, but let’s delude ourselves they are safe and necessary, as I’m sure everyone has seen just how bad Covid is with half our street dropping dead from it already. Right. Does anyone know anyone who has seen anyone drop-dead yet in your street from Bs 19?

Please fellow Australians.
Take your 5th juice shot by Xmas. These stockpiles will soon expire, and we need them gone.

Just because Shane Warne died a miserable painful death, and many other Australians, is no reason to be skeptical of taking yet another shot.

Do it for your country.
Do it for the rich Global elite pedaphile billionaires, who own our media, and hate fellow meat-eating humans. Eat bugs and insects, god-damn, you fool.
Do it for the paid-off mainstream media that takes billions to lie to you, and fake Journo’s, and most of all, do it for the politicians who sold their grandmother to be where they are.

Loyalty to the idiot box is key.
That’s the path to a better 98-gender society. A society that kills babies after they’re born, as women have rights you know (babies’ lives don’t matter so shut up nor do white lives you racist people), and cuts them up without painkillers as the NZ PM has legally approved, for tens of thousands of dollars in valuable body parts sold to a freshly born industry, and our elections would never be rigged, as Joe Biden really got the most votes of any living President, even if he rarely left his basement. And who says he doesn’t need fake mail-in voters, especially dead voters, or the triple-vaxxed soon-to-be dead looney left voters who somehow think he is a good president?
Society has never been better. Such diversity and equal rights where even retards can become US senators. Who said you need qualifications? Being a loser is worth more than any qualification, and Climate change is really the most important issue of our time.
When’s the next LGBTc3po fanboy end-of-society pride quarter/ decade? Don’t want to miss it.”

Australian National Review
www.anrnews.com

Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)