Special Prosecutor Frames the Background of the Sussmann Case, The FBI Was Manipulated, Duped by Clinton Campaign

Special Prosecutor Frames the Background of the Sussmann Case, The FBI Was Manipulated, Duped by Clinton Campaign

New York Times narrative engineer Charlie Savage is tweeting from within a packed media center at the E. Barrett Prettyman courthouse in Washington DC for the government case against Clinton lawyer Michael Sussmann. [TWEET THREAD]  The mentions and notations, while skewed toward the self interest of media, give us a good insight into what is taking place in the courtroom.

First things first. All media reporting of this case will be done through the prism of their own cooperation in the perpetration of the fraud.  The MSM knew along with everyone else inside and outside of government, that their efforts to create the Trump-Russia conspiracy and collusion narrative were based on fraudulent pretext manufactured by the Clinton campaign.  They all knew it. They all acted collaboratively and they all engaged purposefully.

As noted by Charlie Savage, prosecutor Deborah Shaw, a member of the Durham team, delivered the opening remarks to frame the government position in the case.

The telling remarks came early: “Shaw addresses “the elephant in the room” – tells jury their feelings about Russia, Trump, Clinton can’t play a role in the case. This is about “our FBI” which should not be used as a tool by anyone, Republicans or Democrats.”  In essence, prosecutor Shaw is telling the jury the FBI were duped into the Trump-Russia conspiracy investigation by outsiders connected to the Clinton campaign.

That’s a critical baseline from the government we must understand and accept.  That baseline now indicates that none of the DOJ and FBI operatives involved in the fraudulent scheme will be held accountable by the Durham team.  “Our FBI should not be used as a tool by anyone,” yet they were, so sayeth the United States Government.

There you have it folks.  For those who tried to avoid the uncomfortable reality of the situation. The Durham prosecution has set down the cornerstone establishing the DOJ/FBI was used and tricked.

The prosecution cannot later turn toward DOJ and FBI officials who were victimized by the Clinton outside group, reverse the predicate motive of the prior trial, and then hold the DOJ and FBI legally accountable.

That’s that.

The Durham accountability focus is now narrowed to the Clinton team, starting with Michael Sussmann.

This outcome was always visible when we accept the totality of the Robert Mueller probe as an overlay into this entire scenario.  Put into a question I have asked for two years:

How could John Durham hold DOJ and FBI officials accountable for participating in the Trump-Russia fraud, when those same DOJ and FBI officials were part of the Robert Mueller cover-up operation? 

Answer, they can’t.   If Durham were to connect the conspiracy of the outside government and inside government collusion, he would be penetrating an impregnable firewall that would take down multiple DC government institutions simultaneously.

Durham is being permitted to give the illusion of accountability, but he was not authorized or permitted to expose the Dept of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, or any other institution.

The vehicles of our justice institutions are rusted and broken.

Bill Barr was the Bondo application.  John Durham is the spray paint.

The question asked two years ago is answered.

Source

NSA Reports for 5th Consecutive Year the Intelligence Agency Has Extracted Unlawful Electronic Data Without Warrants

NSA Reports for 5th Consecutive Year the Intelligence Agency Has Extracted Unlawful Electronic Data Without Warrants

At this point in our nation’s history, certain acceptances are needed in order to accurately identify the current status of our situation.

    • The Legislative Branch (SSCI) created the Intelligence State, the Fourth Branch of superseding government.
    • The Executive Branch (FBI, DOJ, NSA) control the Fourth Branch of superseding government.
    • The Judicial Branch (FISA Court) is the facilitating approval apparatus for the Fourth Branch.

.

With that empirical and well documented reality in place, all three branches of U.S. government work in unison.  Who or what can intervene to stop the Fourth Branch of government from operating unilaterally?

This is the serious question that no one ever discusses.

The FISA Court is the private, secret, unchecked judicial system authorizing the power for the Intelligence State.

As a result, we continue to see NSA reports showing the unconstitutional surveillance of the American people continuing without consequence [NSA Release Here].

This is the 5th straight year where the National Security Agency (NSA) produces a document admitting their metadata capturing system, the system that captures all electronic communication of every single American and puts it into a stored database, is continually used as a research library for unnamed federal agents to scour (without search warrants) for the private documents of American citizens.

At this point, the NSA admission without consequence is simply just another Tuesday, it literally doesn’t even make the headlines anymore.

The executive summary does, however, include the NSA introducing the latest admissions about violating the 4th amendment right of Americans, while bragging about how their diversity hiring efforts have paid off.

So, there’s that.

At least we know now the genderless, pronoun specific eyeballs looking at our emails, phone calls, text messages, and listening to your instructions to Alexa in your connected home office, are compliant with the latest diversity quota amid the surveillance operations headquarters.

As the NSA states in their opening to the congressional branch that authorizes their existence:

“I would call the reader’s attention to a new section in this semiannual report outlining the outstanding work of the OIG’s Diversity and Engagement Committee (DEC). The DEC, which we set up shortly after I joined the OIG, conducts and coordinates a wide range of programming, training, and activities that reflect this office’s commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEI&A), and helps to ensure a full range of developmental opportunities for everyone on our team – all of which makes our work better and is, quite simply, the right thing to do for our people.”

So, the nonbinary, green haired on Tuesday, twenty-something transexual with tattoos and facial piercing, is skimming the emails of James O’Keefe, while sipping soy lattes and munching avocado toast, with government purchased sustainable algae cakes, at the local Starbucks with the NSA portal open and super-fast wifi.  Perfect.  Way to go NSA-IG Robert Storch.  At least we know you have your priorities in order.

The semi-annual report to the legislative branch does admit it is challenging for the NSA to monitor its “Rules-Based Targeting (RBT) controls” in order to stop “critical control gaps” which allow the newly hired NSA operators to “target selectors to locations that are prohibited by applicable NSA signals intelligence (SIGINT) collection authorities.”

Put another way, in English terms, the genderless NSA analysts keep searching for stuff they shouldn’t be allowed to search for.  But hey, they’re working on it… just like they were working on it last year, and, well, the year before, and the year before, and the year before and, well, you get the point.

Using NSA terminology, the most twisted use of language to avoid ordinary understanding, the agency says:

“Another IO evaluation examined whether NSA analysts were appropriately documenting the foreign intelligence purpose and using approved U.S. person (USP) identifiers as query terms against Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Section 702 data and in accordance with applicable query procedures. The evaluation revealed several issues that, if not addressed, have the potential to impact the effectiveness of the Agency’s internal controls used to protect the civil liberties and privacy rights of USPs.

Specifically, as described in the Intelligence Oversight section of this report, the OIG’s findings included that USP queries performed against FISA Section 702 data did not always follow NSA procedural and policy requirements, that some selector information within NSA’s selector management tool was not documented with consistency, and that a NSA query tool did not prevent certain queries containing known USP selectors from processing.”

Put in common terms, Jaquina’s cousin Xenatra didn’t have enough rent money and asked her bestie in the NSA to dig up some dirt on her landlord. Jaquina gives Xenatra the details of the landlord’s Only Fans account, and subsequently the rent was deferred for the month.  Sister’s gotchu, peace – out, y’all.  A’ight den, you feelin’ me? 

The NSA accepts this might reflect poorly upon the agency, but they promise to do better.

The NSA also notes their “work from home” program has been a little problematic.  It appears the NSA did a few spot checks of the analysts at home when logged into the NSA portal, and well, things were not exactly as professional as the NSA executive administrators would have liked.  As a result:

[…] “We have integrated the option to conduct physical, virtual, or hybrid inspections in our planning for future inspections.  The Cyberspace Workforce Improvement Program advisory memorandum highlighted the need for the Agency to formally identify a comprehensive list of work roles required to be certified in accordance with the Department of Defense (DoD) Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program.”

Apparently, the United States Department of Defense (DoD) isn’t quite comfortable with D’Quasario Chavez monitoring the internal communications of the U.S. NATO alliance, while bong hittin’ with the crew in his living room.  Future “virtual” inspections for analysts working from home with Top-Secret Security Clearances will be modified accordingly.

Sleep well, America…

…The NSA is counting on it.

Source

Amsterdam COVID Compliance Police Release the Attack Dogs on Protesting Groups, Literally

Amsterdam COVID Compliance Police Release the Attack Dogs on Protesting Groups, Literally

Previously the police in Melbourne, Australia, held the record as being the most violent anti-protesting enforcement mechanism of a totalitarian state, using tanks, tear gas and rubber bullets to wage war against their citizens. However, today the police in Amsterdam said, ‘hold my beer‘ and went one step further.

Massive anti-lockdown demonstrations in Amsterdam turned into real violence with protesters mauled by police dogs and beaten with batons in the streets.  The COVID compliance police went to extraordinary lengths to be physically violent as noted in the videos from the protest. WATCH:

[embedded content]

.

Another video shows just how massive this crowd was; and, at any given moment, if this crowd REALLY wanted to turn the tables on the police and put blood on the streets, it would have been entirely possible.

[embedded content]

.

Source

Next Up, COVID Passport Implants?

Next Up, COVID Passport Implants?

Just when you think the merge of medical science and technology couldn’t get more dangerous, a Swedish company called Epicenter steps forward to take electronic tracking to new heights of alarm.

You might think the concept of rice-sized microchip implants, for COVID vaccination passports, would be met with a resounding nope.   Unfortunately, it seems there are many who are willing to embrace the idea.  The Daily Mail has an article about the process {link}, which includes the following:

(Daily Mail) – […] Epicenter, a Stockholm-based startup, unveiled a new way of carrying around a COVID vaccine passport – in a microchip implanted under your skin. The implant can be read by any device using the near-field communication (NFC) protocol – technology used for contactless payments and keyless entry systems.

In a video shared by Epicenter, Hannes Sjöblad, chief distribution officer, has the chip in his arm and simply waves a smartphone over it to pull up his vaccination status. (read more)

[embedded content]

From the perspective of personal liberty and privacy, there is no part of this that could possibly have a good long-term outcome.   The vaccine passport concept alone is a massive intrusion into privacy and freedom.  An implant to facilitate or streamline the process?  Heck no!

As we previously noted, the architects of the Build Back Better society (WEF) are guiding various governments on ways to create efficient registration and compliance systems, ie. ways that permit citizens to prove their vaccinated and compliant status.  However, as these discussions are taking place, perhaps it is prudent to pause and think very carefully.

Setting aside the issue of microchipping for a moment, right now, as you are reading this, under the guise of enhancing your safety, the U.S. Federal Government is in discussions with the medical community, multinational corporations and employers of citizens to create a more efficient process for you to register your vaccine compliance.

We know their conversation under the terminology of a COVID Passport.  The current goal is to make a system for us to show and prove our authorized work status, which, as you know, is based on your obedience to a mandated vaccine.

Beta tests are being conducted in various nations, each with different perspectives and constitutional limitations, based on pesky archaic rules and laws that govern freedom.

For the western, or for lack of a better word ‘democratic‘ outlook, Australia, New Zealand and Europe are leading the way with their technological system of vaccination check points and registered state/national vaccination status tied to your registration identification.

New York City has recently joined the vaccine checkpoint process, as their city requires the vaccine to enter all private businesses.

The Australian electronic checkpoints are essentially gateways where QR codes are being scanned from the cell phones of the compliant vaccinated citizen. Yes comrades, there’s an App for that.

Currently, the vaccine status scans are registered by happy compliance workers, greeters at the entry to the business or venue. Indeed, the WalMart greeter has a new gadget to scan your phone prior to allowing you custody of a shopping cart.

In restaurants, the host or hostess has a similar compliance scanner to check you in prior to seating or a reservation confirmation.

It’s simple and fun. You pull up your QR code on your cell phone (aka portable transponder and registration device), using the registration App, and your phone is scanned delivering a green check response to confirm your correct vaccination status and authorized entry.

The Australian government, at both a federal and state level, is working closely with Big Tech companies (thirsting for the national contract) to evaluate the best universal process that can be deployed nationwide.

As noted by all six Premiers in the states down under, hardware (scanners) and software (registration) systems are all being tested to find the most comprehensive/convenient portable units to settle upon. Meanwhile in the U.S., cities like Los Angeles and New York await the beta test conclusion before deploying their own version of the same process.

In Europe, they are also testing their vaccine checkpoint and registration processes known as the EU “Green Pass.”

The “Green Pass” is a similar technological system that gives a vaccinated and registered citizen access to all the venues and locations previously locked down while the COVID-19 virus was being mitigated. What would have been called a “vast right-wing conspiracy theory” 24 months ago, is now a COVID passport process well underway.

As with all things in our rapid technological era, you do not have to squint to see the horizon and accept that eventually this process will automate, and there will be a gadget or scanning gateway automatically granting you access without a person needing to stand there and scan each cell phone QR code individually.

The automated process just makes sense. You are well aware your cell phone already transmits an electronic beacon enabling your Uber or Lyft driver access to your location at the push of a touchscreen button, another convenient App on your phone. So, why wouldn’t the gateways just accept this same recognizable transmission as registration of your vaccine compliant arrival at the coffee shop?

The automated version is far easier and way cooler than having to reach into your pocket or purse and pulling up that pesky QR code on the screen. Smiles everyone, the partnership between Big Tech and Big Government is always there to make your transit more streamline and seamless. Heck, you won’t even notice the electronic receiver mounted at the entry. Give it a few weeks and you won’t remember the reason you were laughing at Alex Jones any more than you remember why you are taking off your shoes at the airport.

However, as this process is created, it is worth considering that you are being quietly changed from an individual person to a product. Some are starting to worry in the beta test:

[…] “you must become an object with attributes sitting in a database. Instead of roaming around anonymously making all sorts of transactions without the government’s knowledge, Australians find themselves passing through ‘gates’. …

All product-based systems have these gates to control the flow of stock and weed out errors. It is how computers see things. The more gates, the more clarity.

You are updating the government like a parcel pings Australia Post on its way to a customer. If a fault is found, automatic alerts are issued, and you are stopped from proceeding. In New South Wales, this comes in the form of a big red ‘X’ on the myGov vaccine passport app (if you managed to link your Medicare account without smashing the phone to bits).

Gate-keeping systems have been adapted from retail and transformed into human-based crowd solutions to micromanage millions of lives with the same ruthless efficiency as barcodes tracking stock. There is no nuance or humanity in this soulless digital age. Barcodes are binary. Good – bad. Citizen or dissident.

Even if you have all the required government attributes to pass through the gates – two vaccines, six boosters, and a lifelong subscription to Microsoft – something could go wrong. If your data fails the scan, you’ll slip into digital purgatory and become an error message. (read more)

It could be problematic if your status fails to register correctly, or if the system identifies some form of alternate lifestyle non-compliance that will block you from entry. Then again, that’s what beta tests are for, working out all these techno bugs and stuff. Not to worry…. move along….

Then again… “For those in the privileged class allowed to shop, take note of Covid signs which encourage cashless transactions under the guise of ‘health’. Messaging around cards being ‘safer’ will increase until the Treasury tries to remove cash entirely, almost certainly with public approval.”

Wait, now we are squinting at that familiar image on the horizon because we know those who control things have been talking about a cashless society for quite a while.

We also know that data is considered a major commodity all by itself. Why do you think every system you encounter in the modern era requires your phone number even when you are not registering for anything. It, meaning you, us, are all getting linked into this modern registration system that is defining our status. We also know that system operators buy and sell our registered status amid various retail and technology systems.

Yeah, that opaque shadow is getting a little clearer now.

Perhaps you attempt to purchase dog food and get denied entry into Pet Smart because you didn’t renew the car registration.  Or perhaps you are blocked from entry because you forgot to change the oil on the leased vehicle you drive, and Toyota has this weird agreement with some retail consortium.   You head to the oil change place that conveniently pops up in the citizen compliance App –it’s only two blocks away– they clear the alert after they do the oil change, and you are gateway compliant again.

Missed your booster shot? We’re sorry citizen, your bank account is frozen until your compliance is restored… please proceed to the nearest vaccination office as displayed conveniently on your cell phone screen to open access to all further gates (checkpoints)…. tap to continue!

Earlier today, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki confirmed the definition of “fully vaccinated” is an arbitrary determination by some opaque panel within the bureaucracy of the U.S. healthcare industry.  Being vaccinated is no longer being “fully vaccinated”, as the booster shots are soon to become part of the mandate.  WATCH:

[embedded content]

.

It seems transparently obvious where this is heading:

Source

Kyle Rittenhouse Violated the Safari Principle

Kyle Rittenhouse Violated the Safari Principle

A good article outlining why Kyle Rittenhouse was considered a specifically purposeful target for the regime is written at Powerline Blog by Paul Mirengoff [SEE HERE].

What the author essentially describes is something CTH readers have witnessed for over a decade, we called it “The Safari Principle‘ narrative; and it surfaced in its most modern form during the George Zimmerman case.

In essence the underlying elements of the Safari Principle narrative begin with a pretense that victims of the mob, any mob or individual predator, have no one except themselves to blame because they did not follow the rules of the safari.  When in the proximity of any person, event or situation that is engaged in an unlawful act supported by the political left, you are not permitted to exit your vehicle or engage in activity that will lead to your targeting.

If you enter their “space to destroy“, you are to blame for your own outcome.  The safari narrative includes catch phrases like “he should not have gotten out of the car,” and “he shouldn’t have traveled to Kenosha,” all based on the same principle.

(Powerline) […] The Rittenhouse prosecution and the demonization of him by the left (including the left-wing media) stems from a simple premise. Leftists, including Antifa and BLM, have the right to take to the street causing chaos and property damage, and when they do, those who disagree with them must stand aside while leftists run riot. If they don’t stand aside, they have no right to defend themselves against members of the mob who come after them — even if someone points a gun at them (as Grosskreutz did). (read more)

The first advocacy for the modern “Safari Principle” surfaced prior to the George Zimmerman trial, in the summer of 2012, when the professionally aggrieved first began the narrative: “He shouldn’t have gotten out of his car”.

Historically we used to blame the victim by saying he/she was in the wrong place at the wrong time. However, politically it became too difficult to define where the wrong places were, and simultaneously legislators continued to struggle defining the right vs. wrong times law abiding people were allowed to be in these places.

Historically the political media were skilled at excusing transparently guilty.  However, in the aftermath of the Obama paradigm shift, where the media began accusing the transparently innocent, a more specific rule was needed.

After various opinions were considered eventually the advocates settled upon The Safari Principle – A selected narrative used throughout 2012/2013 as a point of advocacy driving home the belief that George Zimmerman had no right to follow, then exit his vehicle, when he saw a suspicious Trayvon Martin peering through windows and casing houses.

The “Safari Principle” evolved to further claim ‘if you do get out of your car, you deserve what you get’ with the implication by the leftist narrative engineers was essentially that young black males cannot control their behavior.

Shortly after the grievance advocates of Ben Crump, Natalie Jackson, Daryl Parks and the congressional black caucus announced their own support for the Safari Principle – another incident surfaced in Virginia when two reporters for the Virginia Pilot stopped and exited their vehicle after their car was hit by bricks.

The couple was attacked by a mob of somewhere between 30 to 100 young black males while shouting “justice for Trayvon”.  After the reporters left the hospital the Virginia Pilot editorial team quickly apologized for not following the Safari Park rules, accepted the beating of their reporters was the fault of the couple who stopped their vehicle, and the newspaper promised they would join the advocacy movement.

big mike 3Fast forward through several more examples to August of 2014 and Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson exited his vehicle after Mike Brown punched him in the head and tried to gain his service revolver. The meme of The Safari Principle was quick to surface again, LOUDLY.

Officer Darren Wilson had no right to get out of his car after the attack.

By exiting his SUV Wilson was to blame for Mike Brown charging him in the street. Again reaffirming the leftist worldview that young black males cannot control their behavior.

Subsequently the grievance advocates pointed out Officer Wilson was ultimately to blame for shooting Mike Brown. If Wilson had followed the Safari Principle Mike Brown would still be alive today.

After Mike Brown was killed by police officer Darren Wilson, the Safari Principle advocates applied the same theme to explain how Zemir Begic was guilty of his own murder, again in Saint Louis.

Zemir Begic exited his vehicle in the vicinity of three young black males who beat him to death with hammers. Begic would be alive today if he had only followed The Safari Principle rules.

A year later, 2015 in Baltimore, Maryland, Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake then became a public advocate for the safari rules when she proclaimed her decision to let the riots, looting and arson continue, as it was intended specifically to give the mob “space to destroy.”  Despite the dozens of property owners who saw their shops, stores and livelihoods go up in smoke, the rules of the safari took precedent.

Again in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death in Minnesota the rules of the safari became evident when looting, arson and riots were defined as “expressions of speech.”  All violence supported by the political left is considered speech, while speech opposed by the left is defined as violence.

Because the visible chaos did not align with the gentle media descriptions of “protests“, the corporate media decision was to modify the language used to describe the arson and riots by using the term “mostly peaceful protests,” that term has stuck within the visible chaos over the past few years in various forms.

Obviously the word “mostly” is a relative term , and that provides the flexibility needed to convince viewers the violence they are witnessing isn’t really the violence they are witnessing.

.

Kyle Rittenhouse made the mistake of trying to impede violence, arson and rioting supported by the political left and their media allies.   Rittenhouse paid a heavy price for not following the rules of the safari, and that is why they are so determined to make an example of him.

In 2020 the FBI, the political left who need/support the violence, and the current occupant of the White House did not make the same mistake as Rittenhouse.  Instead the FBI, Democrats and Joe Biden adhered to the safari rules and took the approved approach as demanded by the mob:

Source

The White House Occupant Reacts to Rittenhouse Verdict, “I Stand By What The Jury Has Concluded, The Jury System Works and We Have To Abide By It”

The White House Occupant Reacts to Rittenhouse Verdict, “I Stand By What The Jury Has Concluded, The Jury System Works and We Have To Abide By It”

The fraudulently installed White House occupant had his physical today on the eve of his 80th birthday.   Upon returning from Walter Reed hospital, Biden was asked for his response to the Rittenhouse verdict and whether he stood by his previous incendiary remarks labeling Kyle Rittenhouse as a “white supremacist.”

The state media stenographers choose their words carefully so as not to confuse the mental acuity of the Oval Office resident.  In response the semi-coherent front man for the most condescending, vile, inept and ideological network of communists said:

“I just heard a moment ago. I didn’t watch the trial, so I ya know” … “Well look, I stand by what the jury has concluded. The jury system works and we have to abide by it”… WATCH:

[embedded content]

.

Never forget that the first thing Big Tech (writ large) did following the 2020 election was to modify all platform ‘terms of service’ with a new rule saying that any speech questioning the legitimacy of the election was akin to undermining the principles of democracy.  They knew the scam they had executed with fraudulent mail-in ballots and manipulated election results in several key counties.

Never doubt that in the background of everything happening in/around the world of politics, the entire apparatus who work in the political industry know that Joe Biden was a fraudulently elected President.  They won’t admit it, they will deny it, they will even pretend not to know it; however, at the end of the day they do know what happened, and they know their participation.  As a result, they know exactly what “Let’s Go Brandon“, and “F**k Joe Biden” are all about.

Source

The White House Occupant Reacts to Rittenhouse Verdict, “I Stand By What The Jury Has Concluded, The Jury System Works and We Have To Abide By It”

The White House Occupant Reacts to Rittenhouse Verdict, “I Stand By What The Jury Has Concluded, The Jury System Works and We Have To Abide By It”

The fraudulently installed White House occupant had his physical today on the eve of his 80th birthday.   Upon returning from Walter Reed hospital, Biden was asked for his response to the Rittenhouse verdict and whether he stood by his previous incendiary remarks labeling Kyle Rittenhouse as a “white supremacist.”

The state media stenographers choose their words carefully so as not to confuse the mental acuity of the Oval Office resident.  In response the semi-coherent front man for the most condescending, vile, inept and ideological network of communists said:

“I just heard a moment ago. I didn’t watch the trial, so I ya know” … “Well look, I stand by what the jury has concluded. The jury system works and we have to abide by it”… WATCH:

[embedded content]

.

Never forget that the first thing Big Tech (writ large) did following the 2020 election was to modify all platform ‘terms of service’ with a new rule saying that any speech questioning the legitimacy of the election was akin to undermining the principles of democracy.  They knew the scam they had executed with fraudulent mail-in ballots and manipulated election results in several key counties.

Never doubt that in the background of everything happening in/around the world of politics, the entire apparatus who work in the political industry know that Joe Biden was a fraudulently elected President.  They won’t admit it, they will deny it, they will even pretend not to know it; however, at the end of the day they do know what happened, and they know their participation.  As a result, they know exactly what “Let’s Go Brandon“, and “F**k Joe Biden” are all about.

Source

Kyle Rittenhouse Overcome With Emotion After NOT GUILTY Verdict – Video

Kyle Rittenhouse Overcome With Emotion After NOT GUILTY Verdict – Video

White supremacy is why we have a civilization (just barely). Polite folk don’t boast about it and they treat everyone they meet as human beings.

Everyone should be FOR civilization, right?

Am currently reading “How the Scots Invented the Modern World”.

But I guess the “progressives” would prefer to go back to unending tribal warfare – and we are awfully near the precipice on that.

Sorry idiots, but Wakanda ain’t a real thing. Hutu massacring Tutsi is more in line with reality, and shows what the US could become if we follow those who are afflicted with the sin of ENVY, and/or the stupid evil ideology pumped into their empty heads.

Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)