The Medicare data that the CDC never shows the public makes this crystal clear. I wonder what public benefit there is of hiding this data. Why doesn’t anyone want to see it?
The US Medicare data (which the CDC hides from view) shows that the flu vaccine causes more than 1 death per million vaccinated making it too unsafe to be used.
Executive summary
The Medicare data proves that the flu vaccine is too unsafe to use because it kills more than 1 person per million vaccinated, which is the safety threshold noted by vaccine expert Paul Offit.
The evidence has been in plain sight but nobody seems to care.
Introduction
I find it really annoying that our government is hiding the safety data on vaccines. How does hiding the data protect the public from harm?
Of course, I’m not a doctor and doctors don’t have any problem at all with their government hiding safety data. Have you ever seen any of them complain about the lack of transparency? Of course not! None of them want their licenses revoked or their grants canceled.
However, since I’m not a doctor, I’m not encumbered.
So I wanted to let you in on a little secret: the government hides the data from us because the vaccines they’ve been promoting are unsafe.
Let’s take the flu vaccine for example.
Have you noticed that the government NEVER shows you the data from Medicare, VSD, BEST, or any other database?
The record level data we need to make a proper safety assessment is simply never made publicly available.
The reason is simple: the shots are deadly and should be pulled. If they released the data, everyone would know this. So they keep the data hidden from public view.
Thanks to an anonymous HHS employee, I’ve been provided with the “days after death” for the flu vaccine.
I’ve already published the flu charts twice before (here and here) and nobody noticed, even though I pointed it out in my Feb 25 Game Over article, so I’m going to point it out once again now
Figure 1. Number of deaths per day after taking the flu shot. See the spike on Day 0? It’s easy to miss if you aren’t looking. That’s a problem. That could only be caused by the vaccine itself. There is no other way to explain this “coincidence.”
See the spike on Day 0?
At least 375 “excess deaths” on Day 0!
Last I checked, there is no need to vaccinate people for the flu right before they die because the vaccine takes time to have an effect. That’s why there is normally a reduced number of deaths on Day 0 vs. baseline: if you are about to die, they aren’t going to waste time vaccinating you.
But you can see there are a375 excess deaths on Day 0.
Now consider that this is a subset of all the people who get the flu vaccine in 2021:
It’s only people in Medicare
It’s only people who got the flu shot in Q1 of 2021
It’s only people < 80
375 excess deaths times 1M is more than the population of the US.
So over 1 person per million died.
Summary
The flu vaccine kills > 1 person per million vaccinated.
This is above the safety threshold of a vaccine articulated by vaccine expert Paul Offit.
This means the flu vaccine should be pulled from the market.
I don’t know how I can make it any clearer than that.
And the COVID vaccine? Well, it’s killing people at a 1,000X greater rate than the flu shot. It should have been pulled long ago. Check out this analysis by Denis Rancourt that, after accumulating 100K views, was pulled from ResearchGate. It’s a quality analysis. For example, one of my colleagues who NEVER texts me on ANY papers, texted me to look at this one: “Just published. This data is really stunning.”
But the health authorities are looking the other way and the doctors just blindly do whatever the CDC says, no matter how many people are killed.
Florida Surgeon General Joe Ladapo asked them a simple question. They ignored it, responded with a “safe and effective sales pitch,” and accused him of spreading misinformation.
Figure 1. Joe Ladapo. This is what an honest public health official looks like.
Executive summary
Florida Surgeon General Joe Ladapo has been a reliable truth-teller throughout the pandemic. After noticing that the VAERS reports in his state were off the charts, he wrote a letter to the CDC and FDA asking them to explain his observations.
Rather than directly answering Dr. Ladapo’s questions, the heads of both agencies sent him a “safe and effective” sales pitch. They also accused him of spreading COVID misinformation.
Ladapo correctly pointed out a huge issue with the narrative. If the vaccines are really as “safe and effective” as claimed, why are the VAERS reports off-the-charts?
Something is seriously wrong. Both agency heads should have acknowledged the discrepancy and investigated. If they had done so, they would have found other “discrepancies” such as the over 700 safety signals (including death and stroke) that were triggered in VAERS that were never explained or reported to the public.
They should both be fired. Both agencies are responsible for public safety, yet their heads cannot directly answer even the most basic safety questions about the vaccine. They must deflect instead.
Unfortunately, Congress is looking the other way on all issues related to vaccine safety. After all, it was Congress who pushed the vaccine on the public. So Congress is not likely to investigate the issues with the FDA/CDC anytime soon.
My fellow Substack writers also mocked the FDA/CDC response.
Introduction
On February 15, 2023, Florida Surgeon General Joe Ladapo wrote a letter to the CDC and FDA asking them to explain why in Florida, there was an 18X increase in VAERS reports overall and a 45X increase in reports of life-threatening conditions after the COVID vaccines were rolled out. Since there was only a 5X increase in vaccine administration, why was there a disproportionately high response in the adverse event rates in VAERS?
Three weeks later, on March 10, the FDA/CDC wrote back a response that sounded like a “sales pitch” for the vaccine. They also criticized him for spreading vaccine misinformation (i.e., they tried to gaslight him).
The FDA/CDC didn’t even attempt to directly address his concerns in their response. They avoided the numbers he cited like the plague. They changed the topic instead of addressing his very legitimate concerns.
This just shows you how corrupt the top officials of both organizations are. They can’t answer simple questions without changing the subject.
Here’s the response that they should have sent
Dear Joe,
Hey, thanks so much for writing and bringing this very important data anomaly to our attention.
To be honest, we both have always admired you from afar. We are huge fans of the work you are doing in Florida to expose the truth about the COVID vaccines!
In particular, you demonstrated great courage and initiative in designing and executing a study in your state that proved the vaccines are unsafe and should be stopped. We wish other public health officials were as responsible as you have been and took the initiative to double check our work instead of just believing everything we say at face value. After all, we’ve been pretty much wrong about everything COVID related, so it only makes sense to be very suspicious about anything we recommend. In fact, to be honest, we even joke to our friends privately that if Americans just listened carefully to everything we said and did the opposite, they’d be much better off. LOL!
In your particular case, you are absolutely right to point out that there is simply no possible way that there could be so many VAERS reports if the vaccines are safe and effective.
Let’s dive into how we arrived at that conclusion.
There are really only three possibilities here for your seeing a disproportionate number of VAERS reports:
Fraud and/or gaming
Higher propensity to report, but ONLY for the COVID vaccines (and not for any other vaccines during the same period)
The vaccines are unsafe
To be perfectly honest, there is no evidence for #1. Not even David Gorski is making that argument.
With respect to #2, we have to wonder: “Why would people overreport for the COVID vaccines and not for any other vaccines in the same time period?”
We have no evidence of a higher propensity to report for any other vaccine. We even had an independent market research firm survey healthcare workers and they found an unchanged propensity to report. Human behavior is simply very hard to change; no surprise! So that wasn’t it.
In addition, we checked directly with doctors we work with and told them we wouldn’t have their license to practice medicine revoked. Note that usually we don’t offer that, but this time we really wanted to know the truth.
They all told us that they’ve never seen anything like the side-effects from these COVID vaccines before. In fact, we talked to one neurologist in California and she had over 1,000 of her 20,000 patients who reported new serious neurological issues shortly after getting the vaccine. That isn’t overreporting because she only filed 2 VAERS reports, not 1,000. In 11 years, she’s never needed to make a single VAERS report; this year, she needed to make 1,000.
We are left with option #3: The COVID vaccines are super dangerous.
So yes, upon investigation, you were right. The reason for all those reports is because the vaccines are simply not as safe as we told people. In fact, they are downright dangerous. This was recently acknowledged in the scientific peer-reviewed literature: “An abundance of studies has shown that the mRNA vaccines are neither safe nor effective, but outright dangerous.”
We’ll also let you in on a secret that we haven’t told anyone. The vaccine doesn’t protect you from dying from COVID at all. We made that up because we had to say something. For example, in this paper published in JAMA, the death rates for vaxxed and unvaxxed patients who got COVID were similar and the differences were not statistically significant. Look for the sentence, “Death occurred in 9 of 142 (6.3%) vaccine breakthrough cases and 91 of 1055 (8.6%) unvaccinated patients with COVID-19.” You have to do your own Fisher exact test calculation yourself and you will find a p-value of .42 which as you know means the differences between the groups were not even close to being statistically significant. And that was the best study we had.
Also, check out this graph showing that it’s actually making things worse: the more you vaccinate, the more people die from COVID. So you were right!
However, if we admitted that you were right publicly, this would make the HHS agencies look silly and it would destroy trust in the agencies, the medical community, Congress, the mainstream media, and local health officials. So we simply can’t do that. It’s nothing personal. It’s just how the game is played. We hope you understand.
So that’s why we’re going to publish a sham letter where we ignore your question (because we can’t answer it), deny everything, and accuse you of spreading misinformation. After all, we want to keep our jobs.
Please keep this letter between us. If it gets out, we’ll deny we sent it. But we just wanted to let you know we appreciate you and that you were right. We just can’t admit that publicly right now. We have to make you look bad. I hope you understand and appreciate the position we are in.
Everything is great, we are thrilled with our vaccines and the only problem is not enough people are up to date, so stop the misinformation already, got it?
The important message to Americans is that our agencies have no intention of carefully considering vaccine safety or changing course on their relentless pursuit of frequent, mass, indiscriminate COVID-19 vaccination down to 6-month old babies. It will be up to you to protect yourself and your family.
This tweet sums up a simple way to see who is telling you the truth:
"If the Covid mRNA shots are as safe and effective as the FDA and CDC say they are, there is a simple way to prove it: Drop the liability shield."
Joe Ladapo is pretty much the only trustable public health authority in America today.
Ladapo has expressed legitimate concerns about the safety of the COVID vaccines and the FDA/CDC are simply unable to explain this data. Instead, they deflect and distract the public from the important issues he raised and attempt to make him look like he is the bad guy.
The FDA/CDC leadership should be ashamed of themselves.
On a recent Southwest flight, I offered $10,000 to the people sitting next to me to remove their face masks for the remainder of the flight. No takers. This shows you how strong the brainwashing is.
Executive summary
This tweet went viral with over 1M views in just 24 hours:
My intent wasn’t to put anyone at risk.
It was simply to ask a HYPOTHETICAL question to quantify how strongly people fear COVID today and how strongly they think masks are effective in protecting them against the risk.
The result: people are very strongly brainwashed. They fear COVID and believe that masks offer solid protection. That’s why people refused. Their life isn’t for sale.
Note that…
I was not going to place anyone at risk. I just wanted to see how strongly people felt about their face diapers.
Masks don’t work at all; not a single randomized study has shown a protective effect of any size that is statistically significant.
Everyone willingly removes their mask to eat and/or drink. No monetary incentives required.
If you are sitting next to someone who is infected, a single breath is sufficient to infect you during the time you are unmasked.
Masks don’t work and even if they did, people aren’t covering their eyes so the mitigation is completely useless and nonsensical.
Despite that, people are so brainwashed with fear thanks to the CDC narrative that they would refuse an offer of $10,000 to take off their mask.
Next time, I’m going to find out how much money it would take for people wearing a mask outdoors to remove their mask for just one minute. How much do you think it will cost me?
Over 24 people died in less than a year after the vaccines rolled out at this 114 room elderly care facility. Only 1 person died from COVID. What did the others die from? Nobody would return my calls.
Valerie Anderson was one of over 24 who died at BSL Clifton Hill in less than 12 months. Is this normal? Nope. NOBODY WANTS TO TALK ABOUT IT. Don’t worry though. I’m sure there will not be any investigations.
Executive summary
BSL Clifton Hill is a elderly care facility located in Melbourne, Australia with 114 rooms. This is a new facility that opened February 2020. They went from 43 residents to 73 residents when the new building opened In February 2020.
Over 24 people died there in less than a year after the vaccines rolled out which is higher than I expected to see over a 12 month period. And only one person died from COVID. Did the others die from natural causes?
It all depends on the age mix of the facility. That’s something I wasn’t able to find out because nobody would talk to me. That makes me very suspicious.
But we can look at the ages of the people who died to estimate the expected death percentage. And when we do that, we find that it’s a younger than we would have expected based on the people who died.
So something is killing these people.
I want to find out what killed these people. Was it the vaccine? Or something else?
I want to know:
What killed all these people?
Why don’t they want to talk to me about it?
Simple. Is that too much to ask?
I have the names, birth dates and death dates for each of these people listed below.
If you can help me find out what killed these people, please use the Contact me link.
Without knowing the age mix and number of residents of the facility, I don’t know what to think. It’s troubling that nobody will talk to me.
These people likely did not die from COVID
According to the official records, only 1 person died from COVID from Clifton Hill. And since the rest were all vaccinated, they couldn’t have died from COVID, right? So how did all these people die?
This is from the official records. Only one COVID death.
Management
Residential Services Manager, Milly Kuranage
BSL board members include:
Stephen Newton AO
Jane Freemantle OAM
Michael Langhammer
Dana Hlavacek
Stephen Duckett AM
Staff members who resigned
Bernadette Wilkinson has resigned from her position as Admin Manager and Client Engagement. Her last day of employment was on 1st October 2021.
Helen Rodd has also resigned from her position as registered Nurse. Helen mostly worked as a registered nurse in-charge in the afternoon shifts.
Resident deaths in September 2021 (N=2)
From the October newsletter:
Prakash Samuel passed away in September. He was a devout Christian and has been resident of BSL since Sumner house days. He had 5 boys and worked as a journalist and an evangelist in his younger days. RIP Sam and you will be missed by all of us!
Mark Hodgeson also passed away in September at hospital. We remember him as a great Cello player, guitarist and actor. Mark worked in a circus with his father in his younger days. He was a renowned Athlete where he specialised in track and field. He was a loving father to his children and we will dearly miss him.
Resident deaths from Nov 2021-Aug 2022 (N=22)
People who died between Nov 4, 2021 and August 24, 2022 at BSL Clifton Hill. Most of the funerals were done by Jensen Funerals.
Albert Coulter 06/11/2021
Denise Dutton 17/11/2021
Kenzie Messer 25/11/2021
Adeel Soliman 21/12/2021
Edward Gordon Walker 15.03.1966 – 31.12.2021
Robert Ousley 4/1/2022
Anka Kosovac 11/01/2022
Roy Alan Lynch, 87, 04/02/2022
Alan Prescott 09.12.1945 – 13.03.2022 Funeral by Jensen Funerals
Rebecca Brandon 21/03/2022
Michael Spencer 11/04/2022
Marjorie Harrop 11/05/2022
Thomas Walker 21/1/1937 – 12/5/2022. Funeral by Jensen Funerals.
Marjorie McCormack 14/05/2022
Edith Bula 31/05/2022
Joyce Morgan 02/06/2022
Elsa Di Zio 12.08.1944 – 05.08.2022
Rosemary Combe ??/06/2022
Joseph Vignjevic 20.9.1936 – 21/08/2022 aka Joso Vigejevic and Jose Vicnievic. Funeral by : Ern Jensen & Sons Funerals.
Louis Tham 22/08/2022
Valerie Anderson 05/05/1934 -24/08/2022. Funeral by : Ern Jensen & Sons Funerals.
Presentacion Wiencke 24/08/2022
Here are the dates of death plotted out for the 22 above
Dates died plotted as points. If there is nothing going on, the dots will be evenly spaced. Do these dots look evenly spaced to you?
I spoke to a local funeral director
They service many nursing/rest homes and do hundreds of disposals a year. He said they had over a 20% increase in disposals in 2022. Things are still very busy in the industry. He is also finding it difficult to hire staff.
BSL is one of the better facilities in the area. So why are they not being transparent?
People are dying. There are lots of excess deaths in Australia. What are they dying from? This is a matter of great public interest.
Investigating a typical nursing home can give us insights since the public health authorities aren’t releasing the record-level death-vax data.
What we know so far
Her obituary claims Valerie Anderson passed away peacefully at BSL-Clifton Hill, formerly Sambell Lodge, after a short battle with Covid, aged 88.
Wait a second… The vaccine prevents you from dying from COVID, right?!?! Could it be that the vaccine made it more likely she died from COVID?
For all the rest I could find, nothing was said. This is normally how they do it. They don’t want anyone to know if they were killed by the vaccine.
What death rate should we expect to see?
A typical nursing home will average around 10% turnover a year.
More precisely, the number of people we’d expect to to see die a year at any facility is a function of the number of residents and the age mix of the residents.
The probability of death can be found in this table.
So if the residents are all 75 years old, we should expect to see 2.4% of them die a year. So if there are 100 residents, all age 75, we’d only expect to see 2 or 3 deaths a year. So over 24 would be a “surprise.”
If all the residents are 90 years old, it should be 12.8% per year, so 13 people.
If the residents are all 97 years old, it’s 24.9% a year, so 25 people.
I saw the pictures of the people who died. They didn’t average 97 years old. And none of the people who died were 97 or older. In fact, none of the people I looked up was over 90 years old.
That means that the estimated death rate we observed at this facility is 80% higher than normal.
This means we have a problem. Something is very wrong here.
Silence from BSL
I reached out to BSL for comment (both directly to the facility as well as Steph Jones, the media contact at the home office) and they ignored all my attempts.
Perhaps Steph was too busy with other media inquiries? Or they are hiding something. I don’t think they are busy.
Summary
For some reason, nobody at BSL Clifton Hill or the parent company wants to talk about what killed these people.
They are dying off at a rate that I estimate to be 80% above normal. So that might have something to do with the lack of communication.
One of the NFL’s premiere cornerbacks appeared to abruptly call it a career on Saturday — and issued an ominous warning in the process.
Miami Dolphins cornerback Byron Jones, a former All-Pro and Pro Bowler, announced via a pair of tweets that he could no longer “run or jump” and seemingly implied that he was stepping away from the game for good.
Much has changed in 8 years. Today I can’t run or jump because of my injuries sustained playing this game. DO NOT take the pills they give you. DO NOT take the injections they give you. If you absolutely must, consult an outside doctor to learn the long-term implications. https://t.co/g5TTHDQGSY
“Much has changed in 8 years,” Jones tweeted out, while quoting a tweet from 2015 that highlighted his former athletic prowess.
“Today I can’t run or jump because of my injuries sustained playing this game,” Jones added.
That’s when Jones dropped perhaps his most venomous insinuations
“DO NOT take the pills they give. DO NOT take the injections they give you. If you absolutely must, consult an outside doctor to learn the long-term implications.”
Without outright stating so, it’s pretty evident Jones is decrying the NFL’s approach to injury management. Of note, Jones missed the entire 2022 season for the Dolphins due to injury.
While hearing about injections of cortisone or cocktails of painkillers is hardly anything novel in the NFL, Jones’s critique of the NFL’s pain management philosophy is about as withering as it gets.
Even when star Dallas Cowboy linebacker Micah Parsons recently claimed that “95 percent” of the league pushes players to take painkillers to play through injury, it was largely viewed as more of a passing comment than a scathing critique.
The same can’t be said about Jones’s remarks, which he doubled down on with an inauspicious “welcome” to the incoming NFL rookies:
It was an honor and privilege to play in the NFL but it came at a regrettable cost I did not foresee. In my opinion, no amount of professional success or financial gain is worth avoidable chronic pain and disabilities. Godspeed to the draft class of 2023.
“It was an honor and privilege to play in the NFL but it came at a regrettable cost I did not foresee,” Jones said. “In my opinion, no amount of professional success or financial gain is worth avoidable chronic pain and disabilities.
“Godspeed to the draft class 2023.”
Given that he’s only 30 years old, many fans likely expected a bounce-back season from Jones next year.
Remember, the Dolphins lavished Jones with a 5-year, $82.5 million contract after he had four stellar seasons with the Cowboys. Of note, Jones is still under contract for two more seasons.
That’s a lot of money to give someone who isn’t a quarterback, pass rusher or wide receiver, and the Dolphins had high hopes for their star cornerback tandem of Jones and Xavien Howard (a fellow All-Pro and Pro Bowler.) Howard, holding a 5-year, $90 million contract, and Jones formed the most expensive cornerback pairing in football (according to Over The Cap, the Dolphins are the only team in the NFL with two top-10 paid cornerbacks.)
All of that money spent, however, amounted to Jones and Howard combining for a meager 30 total games played together and exactly zero playoff wins.
Assuming Jones cannot, in fact, “run or jump,” and assuming he’s about to submit retirement papers to the league, it doesn’t look like the vaunted Jones-Howard duo will play a 31st game, nor will it win that ever-elusive playoff game.
Brook Jackson, the clinical trials superviser who blew the whistle on Pfizer over its testing of Covid vaccines, has announced that a court date has been assigned to her case.
Type your email…
Subscribe
It will be held on March 1, 2023 at 2:00 pm at the Jack Brooks Federal Courthouse in Beaumont, Texas. The critical point: “All parties are required to attend in person.”
‘See You in Court, Criminals!’ Pfizer Whistleblower Case is Being Taken to the Next Level
“Pfizer has fought ‘discovery’ in its court battle with Brook Jackson every step of the way. If she is successful in her court hearing in March, this charade will come to an end”…
Brook Jackson, the clinical trials superviser who blew the whistle on Pfizer over its testing of Covid vaccines, has announced that a court date has been assigned to her case.
“See you in court, criminals!” she said on Saturday.
She provided a copy of the legal document showing the court date and location. The following legal motions will be under consideration at the court hearing:
Pfizer’s Motion to Dismiss Realtor’s Amended Complaint
ICON PLC’s Motion to Dismiss Relator’s Amended Complaint
Ventavia Research Group, LLC’s Corrected Motion to Dismiss
The case is extraordinary in many regards, but most concerning is that the United States has taken a position against the U.S. citizen seeking accountability against the allegedly offending corporate interests.
On October 4, 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) took “the extraordinary step of filing a Statement of Interest Supporting Dismissal of the Amended Complaint,” the case notes. “It is not unprecedented for the Government to file statements of interest supporting plaintiffs in declined qui tam actions. But the Statement of Interest here is entirely different. It sides with the defendant, Pfizer, and the other defendants, and urges the Court to dismiss Relator’s lawsuit because it fails to identify any ‘false or misleading’ claims, its allegations are ‘implausible,’ and the United States continues to have ‘full confidence’ in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.”
However, Pfizer has made several ‘false or misleading’ claims. Firstly, Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla has falsely implied that the mRNA vaccines “stop the spread” of viral infection and transmission.
“Ensuring as many people as possible are fully vaccinated with the first two dose series and a booster remains the best course of action to prevent the spread of COVID-19,” Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla said in a release in December 2021. A Harvard-led international study published in September 2021 had established that “increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States.”
Pfizer continued to back the “safe and 100% effective” line, even in regards to young persons at miniscule risk from the Covid disease.
In an April 2021 release, Pfizer released the implausible results that the vaccine “was 100% effective in preventing COVID-19 cases in South Africa, where the B.1.351 lineage is prevalent.”
The CDC found in July 2021 that the viral loads between the vaccinated and unvaccinated were similar. Thus, the company’s mRNA shots could not be “100% effective” at preventing “cases.”
“Today, some of those data were published in CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), demonstrating that Delta infection resulted in similarly high SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in vaccinated and unvaccinated people,” the CDC report said. “High viral loads suggest an increased risk of transmission and raised concern that, unlike with other variants, vaccinated people infected with Delta can transmit the virus.”
Pfizer had also claimed that there were no “cases” among young adolescents in its clinical trials of the Covid mRNA shots versus a placebo in April.
In a study of 2,260 U.S. volunteers aged 12 to 15, preliminary data showed “there were no cases of COVID-19 among fully vaccinated adolescents compared to 18 among those given placebo shots,” Pfizer reported.
“These data confirm the favorable efficacy and safety profile of our vaccine and position us to submit a Biologics License Application to the U.S. FDA,” said Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla. “The high vaccine efficacy observed through up to six months following a second dose and against the variant prevalent in South Africa provides further confidence in our vaccine’s overall effectiveness.”
By 2023, scientific research published at the American Public Health Association showed that the vaccinated were more than twice as likely to be infected with Covid-19 than those who had a prior infection.
It has subsequently been admitted in the mainstream media that natural immunity is equally effective as vaccinated immunity at mobilizing resistance to infection. The Lancet on Thursday published a study funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation that showed that natural immunity is at a minimum equivalent to vaccinated immunity.
“This study provides a comprehensive review of studies that have estimated the protection from past COVID-19 infection by variant and time since infection. The result shows high levels of protection against re-infection for ancestral, alpha, and delta variants for all major outcomes,” the study found. “Our analysis found significantly reduced protection against re-infection from the omicron BA.1 variant but that levels of protection against severe disease remained high.”
On Thursday, NBC conceded the study’s findings, which have been reported at Becker News for nearly two years. Nonetheless, Pfizer was exposed by the Twitter Files attempting to censor prominent physicians who were attempting to inform the public about natural immunity, something that arguably could be construed as intent to commit fraud.
Pfizer has a track record of misleading the public. The pharmaceutical company was slammed in November by a British regulator for making “disgracefully misleading” claims about the Covid mRNA shots, also known as “Covid vaccines.”
UK’s pharmaceutical watchdog, the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), found that Dr. Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, made “misleading” statements about healthy children purportedly benefiting from the vaccines.
“There is simply no evidence that healthy schoolchildren in the UK are at significant risk from the SARS COV-2 virus and to imply that they are is disgracefully misleading,” watchdog group UsforThem said.
In regards to Pfizer’s claims that the mRNA shots are “safe,” scientific researchers are from Stanford University, UCLA, Louisiana State University, the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Navarre Health Service in Spain, and Bond University in Australia produced a pre-print study in June showed “the excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials.”
In addition, a pre-print study at the American Heart Association’s journal Circulation in January shows a link between free spike antigens produced by the mRNA Covid shots and a form of heart inflammation known as myocarditis. An Oxford University study has shown that the risk of myocarditis, a form of heart inflammation, is greater from getting ‘vaccinated’ with the mRNA shots than from contracting the virus itself. The study was published in Nature in December 2021.
Furthermore, there is now video evidence that Pfizer employees had concerns about the mRNA shots being linked to heart inflammation as early as 2021. The company did nothing to warn the public about the potential complication. Instead, it was granted 100% liability protection by the United States government, perhaps indefinitely.
Jackson, a former clinical trial auditor with more than 15 years’ experience in clinical research coordination and management, has made the following claims about the Pfizer contractor Ventavia’s clinical trials:
[C]linical trial participants were given their second injection outside of the protocol- mandated nineteen to twenty-three day window. On at least four occasions the vaccine concentrate was over-diluted, which directly affects potency and reduces potential side-effects.
Ventavia failed to report Serious Adverse Events (“SAEs”) to Pfizer and Icon, though that information was available via the clinical trial participants’ “electronic diary” entries. This is perhaps the most egregious violation not only of clinical trial protocol but of public trust.
Ventavia’s documentation practices were careless, sloppy, inaccurate, and many times falsified. Pfizer had access to this data and equally failed its oversight responsibilities which rightfully draws the presumption that data from other clinical trials is just as bad if not worse.
As reported earlier at Becker News, Brook Jackson was seeking to gain discovery to prove that Pfizer’s clinical trials were indeed, fraudulent.
“It’s all up to the judge now,” Jackson told Becker News, noting that there is now two options. “1. He allows us to move forward with discovery. 2. Dismissed.”
Jackson recently shared a development that Pfizer was compelled to drop half the clinical trial participants for its Lyme disease vaccine due to “violations of Good Clinical Practice (GCP)” at sites run by a third-party operators.
Pfizer has fought “discovery” in its court battle with Brook Jackson every step of the way. If she is successful in her court hearing in March, this charade will come to an end and the American public will get the transparency they deserve over a true matter of life and death. Everyone deserves to know the truth about a pharmaceutical product that is one of the most widely administered on earth.
The case documents for United States of America, ex. rel. Brook Jackson vs. Ventavia Research Group, LLC; Pfizer, Inc.; ICON Plc. can be found here. If possible, Becker News will attempt to cover the hearing live in person and discuss the developments with the litigants.
Lee County GOP Invokes Nuremberg Code, Calls on DeSantis to Ban Bioweapon Death Jab
The Lee County GOP is standing for the ‘preservation of the human race’ in calling on Ron DeSantis to ban the highly-lethal COVID-19 jab, which has been identified as a bioweapon.
The Executive Committee of the Lee County, Florida Republican Party is invoking the Nuremberg Code in calling on Governor Ron DeSantis to ban the distribution and sale of the COVID-19 bioweapon jab, citing the massive levels of death and “vaccine” injuries that have occurred as a result of Big Pharma and the US Government’s orchestrated efforts to forcibly inject the bioweapon into the bodies of all Americans.
The Lee County GOP’s Executive Committee officially passed a “Ban the Jab” resolution, which won the approval of more than two-thirds of the committee’s members, calling on Governor Ron DeSantis to ban the sale and distribution of COVID-19 “vaccine” injections. Colloquially known as the “jab,” the injections, which have been identified as bioweapons, have killed and maimed more people than all other vaccines combined.
In the Ban the Jab resolution, the Lee County GOP writes to Governor DeSantis that “strong and credible evidence exists that COVID-19 and COVID-19 injections are biological and technological weapons.”
Citing Pfizer’s own clinical data, the Lee County GOP adds that the bioweapon jabs have caused “1,223 deaths, 42,000 adverse cases, 158,000 adverse incidents, and approximately 1,000 side effects,” and those are just the numbers that the global Big Pharma giant is admitting to.
“An enormous number of humans have died and or have been permanently disabled,” as a result of the COVID-19 bioweapon jab, the resolution states, adding that “credible evidence exists that Covid mRNA shots alter human DNA,” as was shown in a Swedish study.
According to scientific research into the jab, not only does it act as a bioweapon in altering human DNA, but Pfizer COVID shots even contain “self-assembling microtechnology,” and lead to massive blood clots.
“Government agencies, media and tech companies, and other corporations, have committed enormous fraud by claiming COVID injections are safe and effective,” the resolution goes on, before laying out the numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code committed by Big Pharma and Big Government bioweapon pushers.
“On behalf of the preservation of the human race, the Lee County Republican Party calls upon Governor DeSantis and the state legislature to prohibit the sale and distribution of COVID injections and all mRNA injections in the state of Florida,” the resolution reads. “And for the state Attorney General to immediately seize all COVID injections and mRNA injections in the state of Florida and have a forensic analysis conducted.”
While the resolution does not bind Governor DeSantis to actually take any action to ban and seize the COVID jabs, it does put the ball in his court and will arrive on his desk, awaiting his action.
Authored following World War 2 and named for the Nuremberg Trials that led to the mass execution of genocidal Nazis, the Nuremberg Code is a set of “ethical research principles” that govern “human experimentation” and other crimes of war.
Under the very first line of the Nuremberg Code, a violation related to the forced roll-out of COVID-19 bioweapon jabs is found, as the code reads that “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.” Under the COVID jab mandates enforced by both the government and private sector employers, Americans had no choice but to accept an experimental drug.
The true horror of what just happened in East Palestine, Ohio is starting to become clear, but federal, state and local officials continue to insist that everything is just fine. So even though local residents have been puking up blood and developing weird rashes on their skin, everyone is being told that it is perfectly safe to return to their homes and that it is perfectly safe to drink the water. This should make all of us extremely angry, because so many of these people are going to get sick and so many of them are going to die.
Look, the truth should be obvious to everyone at this stage.
Even CNN is admitting that local residents “have developed rashes, sore throats, nausea and headaches after returning to their homes this week“…
Some residents of East Palestine, Ohio, say they have developed rashes, sore throats, nausea and headaches after returning to their homes this week, and they’re worried these new symptoms are related to chemicals released after a train derailment two weeks ago.
The February 3 incident caused a massive fire and prompted officials to evacuate hundreds of people who lived near the site because of fears that a hazardous, highly flammable material might ignite. To prevent a potentially deadly explosion, toxic vinyl chloride gas was vented and burned, releasing a plume of black smoke over the town for days.
Please note that these local residents did not develop these symptoms before they evacuated.
According to CNN, these symptoms developed after they returned to their homes.
And those local residents only returned to their homes because authorities told them that it was safe to do so.
When the decision was made to burn the vinyl chloride, officials knew that it would release enormous amounts of phosgene gas into the air…
Burning vinyl chloride, as the railroad company ultimately did, turns it into hydrogen chloride and phosgene gas, the later of which was used as a weapon of mass slaughter in World War I.
Concerning the release, Silverado Caggiano, a hazardous materials specialist, told WKBN, “We basically nuked a town with chemicals so we could get a railroad open.”
The air, soil and water in much of eastern Ohio and western Pennsylvania have been poisoned, and they will continue to remain poisoned for the foreseeable future.
But the CEO of Norfolk Southern insists that burning the vinyl chloride was the “right move”…
Shaw claimed that the decision to destroy the five derailed train cars and release a column of black, toxic smoke into the air above the village on Feb. 6 was the right one — a claim he reiterated on Sunday, telling the DailyMail.com with a smile that it was the “right move.”
According to the Norfolk Southern CEO, the “terrifying” plume of toxic smoke resulting from the “controlled release” signaled success.
If this was the “right move”, I would hate to see what the “wrong move” would have looked like.
So many local residents have been developing really weird rashes lately. In fact, News Nation just interviewed one woman that developed multiple rashes on her body after showering in East Palestine water that is supposedly safe…
Does watching that footage anger you?
It should.
Tucker Carlson interviewed another resident of East Palestine that says that he has a “chemical burn on my face”…
Tucker Carlson interviews East Palestine Ohio resident Nathan Izotic. "I have chemical burn on my face Tucker"
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
(@IamBrookJackson) 
