New Died Suddenly PSYOP: Mainstream Media Deploys New Narrative To Explain Sudden Death Surge

New Died Suddenly PSYOP: Mainstream Media Deploys New Narrative To Explain Sudden Death Surge

By Stew Peters

 

“Died Suddenly” is closing in on 15 million views, and the film’s impact is not just being seen in America. It’s rapidly going worldwide, as our Australian correspondent Maria Zeee has witnessed firsthand. Senators, in Australia, are finally speaking out about the country’s dramatic rise in sudden and overall deaths.

Read More:
https://truthtube.video/watch/world-premiere-died-suddenly_qnsn2d4fvPHWrUz.html
https://www.truthtalks.live/lifestyle/world-premiere-died-suddenly/

Source

Dr. Ryan Cole on Whether the Blood Supply is Safe: “We Don’t Know”

Dr. Ryan Cole on Whether the Blood Supply is Safe: “We Don’t Know”

By Steve Kirsch

Idaho Medical Association files complaint against controversial doctor | Boise State Public Radio

Executive summary

The medical community is still not seeing any connection between the vaccine and deaths. They don’t acknowledge the relationship except in a few rare cases. This is all willful blindness. So why should we now believe them with respect to the safety of the blood supply from vaccinated people?

Until the medical community starts acknowledging the vaccines are unsafe, their assurances of safety with respect to anything vaccine related should be highly suspect.

In the case of the safety of the blood supply, US pathologist Ryan Cole has a message, “We don’t know.”

Dr. Ryan Cole on the safety of the blood supply

I asked Dr. Ryan Cole what he thought about the integrity of the blood supply. I asked him the same question the dentist in Marathon Man asked: “Is it safe?”

Here is his verbatim response:

We don’t know.

Nobody knows. I have clots from unvaccinated deceased that were transfused and formed large clots post transfusion and died.

No blood bank is checking.

“One cannot find, that for which they do not look”.

This is akin to blood banks and hemophiliacs and HIV in the 1980s. It may not be a problem. However, it may be. There are assays academically available to check for circulating spike protein. It is criminal negligence to not assure the safety of the blood supply based on bureaucratic declarations without scientific explorations.

The bottom line is that Baby Will’s parents are correct. They have made a responsible decision and their decision should be respected by the medical community.

A “Message from Michael” from just over a year ago

Just over a year ago, I wrote about the untimely death of Mike Granata on my Substack in a post entitled “A message from Michael” (not to be confused with the song by Dionne Warwick entitled “Message to Michael”).

One of my readers just now mentioned his death in the comments of my last Substack article.

Michael’s key message was that the medical community has been hiding the vaccine deaths and deliberately looking the other way. They know it is happening, but if they speak out, they will lose their jobs. They asked him to deliver the message to the public so they would not be fired.

Since the start of the vaccination program nearly two years ago, nothing has changed. The medical community is still hiding all the COVID vaccine safety issues today, a year later.

Until there is an admission from the medical community about these deaths and severe adverse reactions, their advice on matters related to the safety of these vaccines should not be considered to be reliable.

Baby Alex: they deleted the hospital records of that death post-transfusion

Sacred Heart Hospital in Washington State has erased all records of the death of baby Alex who died from a blood clot after receiving a transfusion from a vaccinated patient.

So there is no evidence of a problem anymore. They erased it, just like the CDC erased all data linking vaccines and autism. This is how science works nowadays.

Summary

Whatever happened to the precautionary principle of medicine?

In my opinion, this isn’t a close call. We can’t know today if the blood supply is safe because nobody wants to even ask the question and do the experiments required to answer it.

For that reason, Baby Will’s parents’ request to use unvaccinated blood should be respected.

Source

Shocking Video Shows 28-Year-Old Woman Drop Dead While Working Out at a Gym

Gateway Pundit | By Jim Hoft Published December 7, 2022 at 3:00pm

A video of a woman who suddenly collapsed and died while working out at a gym has gone viral on the internet.

The woman, who was later identified as Betsy Dayana Jaramillo Ramírez, was presumed to have died of a heart attack at Zona Muscular gym in Santa Rosa, El Oro province, in Ecuador on Nov. 29, according to New York Post.

More from the outlet:

Ramírez was captured on the gym’s video footage doing squats and weightlifting when she suddenly stopped and fell forward, face-planting on the floor.

TRENDING: J-6 Political Prisoner Pete Schwartz: Juror #8 Flipped Me Off as They Read the Guilty Verdict Against Me (VIDEO)

Other gym-goers, most of them women, rushed to help Ramírez. They sat her in the recovery position while continuously checking her pulse until paramedics arrived.

Ramírez was rushed to Santa Teresita Hospital but arrived with no signs of life. Doctors pronounced her dead upon arrival.

Police and doctors have yet to issue a cause of death, however, it is believed that Ramírez suffered a heart attack.

Watch the video below:

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

Climate Change is Pushing Hospitals to Tipping Point

Climate Change is Pushing Hospitals to Tipping Point

By Vanessa Montalbano

Good morning! Climate 202 researcher Vanessa Montalbano is taking over today while Maxine is on vacation this week.

In today’s edition, we have an exclusive about a bipartisan group of former Environmental Protection Agency administrators who are pushing the Senate to quickly confirm David Uhlmann as head of the EPA’s enforcement office. More on that is below. But first:

Climate change is pushing hospitals to tipping point

A sign at a Manhattan hospital directs visitors to the emergency room entrance. 

When an unprecedented heat wave baked the Pacific Northwest last July, emergency rooms sought any way possible to lower the core body temperatures of patients coming in droves with heat-related ailments.

Many emergency departments in the region began putting people in body bags filled with ice to help safely adjust their temperatures. But despite their lifesaving efforts, around 1,000 excess deaths occurred from the brutal heat.

The scramble to save lives paints the challenging reality that many hospitals and medical workers are facing again this year as severe weather-related health emergencies escalate because of extreme climate events. 

“We unfortunately had a real live stress test here for the Pacific heat dome because the temperatures were so high and we had a 69-fold increase in hospital-related presentations,” said Kristie L. Ebi, the founder of the center for health and global environment at the University of Washington.

At the same time, the health care sector contributes significantly to the worsening climate crisis, representing nearly 8.5 percent of all U.S. emissions.

According to an analysis conducted by World Weather Attribution, that excessive heat wave was made at least 150 times more likely from human-induced climate change.
Last fall, the editors of over a dozen health journals from across the globe simultaneously published a joint editorial calling for urgent climate action to avert catastrophic warming. Without it, the editorial said, rising temperatures will lead to more deaths from heart and lung illness, allergies, kidney problems and pregnancy complications.

“The greatest threat to global public health is the continued failure of world leaders to keep the global temperature rise below 1.5° C and to restore nature,” the authors wrote.

The New England Journal of Medicine went one step further this spring in launching a series focused on highlighting health hazards linked to planet-warming pollution, our colleague Sarah Kaplan reports.

Renee Salas, a researcher at the Center for Climate, Health, and the Global Environment at Harvard University and contributor to the series, says that doctors have a moral obligation to speak out against fossil-fuel use and other planet-warming activities.

“The burning of fossil fuels, the root cause of both air pollution and climate change, threaten medicine’s core mission. They harm health and threaten health care delivery, making our jobs not only harder, but sometimes impossible.”

Too heavy of a lift?

As The Climate 202 reported last month, 61 of the nation’s largest hospital and health-sector companies have joined the Health Sector Climate Pledgeto cut greenhouse-gas emissions in half by 2030.

The commitment is meant to help advance President Biden’s target of reaching net-zero emissions by 2050 and includes more than 650 hospitals and thousands of providers, including two of the five largest U.S. private hospital and health systems, Ascension and CommonSpirit Health.

“The health care industry has come to realize that traditional health care accounts for only about 20 percent of an individual’s (or community’s) overall health,” said Craig Cordola, Ascension’s executive vice president and chief operating officer. “Social determinants and one’s physical environment play an even greater role. It’s imperative that we focus where we can have the greatest impact.”

But Ebi said that it’s difficult to uproot the entire energy system of a health facility. For one, cost is a major factor. Depending on the institution’s profit margin, switching to sustainable machines that leak fewer greenhouse gases might not be possible given their routine expenses.

There are also some things that hospitals can’t adjust, such as leaving the lights on overnight or being unable to reuse certain plastics for hygiene, to satisfy medical protocols.
What’s on the horizon for hospitals

Still, Ebi mentioned that there are smaller opportunities that hospitals can — and should — be pursuing to reduce their carbon footprints, whether that be through energy and waste management or by working to improve the well-being of patient communities.

Each of the organizations that signed onto the pledge — which included public hospitals, health-care centers, pharmaceutical companies, medical-device makers and suppliers — are expected to develop climate-resilience plans for their facilities, including plans to support individuals or communities most vulnerable to the effects of climate change.

According to Ebi, any plan should mention what she called the “low-hanging fruit,” including:

  • Understanding your patient base, and how it could shift with climate change
  • Outlining community vulnerabilities to global warming (for example, care centers that are based in a flood plain)
  • Planning personnel schedules around forecast weather events, or rescheduling surgeries to ensure anticipated surge capacity
  • Providing opportunities for patients that benefit their health and the environment, such as a garden to supply fresh food for the cafeteria

As for Ascension, the system aims to reach net-zero carbon and waste by 2040. In its climate-resilience plans, Cordola said it will work closely with the individuals and communities most vulnerable to the impacts of a warming planet.

“Our focus is on creating healthier communities, including reducing the effects of climate change,” he said. “Leading health systems like Ascension have a role to play in demonstrating our commitment to this work not only to others in the health care industry, but to other industries as well.”

On the Hill
Exclusive: Former EPA administrators push for confirmation of enforcement nominee
The headquarters of the Environmental Protection Agency.

Five former Environmental Protection Agency administrators from both Republican and Democratic administrations are calling on Senate leadership to confirm a permanent head of the agency’s enforcement office before the August recess, according to details shared exclusively with The Climate 202.

David Uhlmann was nominated by President Biden more than a year ago to lead the EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, which is charged with holding companies accountable when they violate the nation’s environmental laws. But Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) has yet to discharge the nomination vote to the Senate floor after the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee voted 10-10 in April to advance Uhlmann’s nomination.

A Schumer spokesman previously said in an email to The Climate 202 that “David Uhlmann’s nomination is a priority and we hope to move to discharge soon.”

In a joint letter signed by the EPA administrators from the Reagan, H.W. Bush, Clinton, W. Bush, and Obama administrations, the people argue that Uhlmann’s background as an environmental-crimes prosecutor for the Justice Department does not justify the prolonged delay and instead allows dangerous pollution to continue to go unregulated.

“We are concerned about the decline in EPA enforcement that has occurred over the last decade, which leaves vulnerable communities less protected from the harmful effects of pollution and puts law-abiding companies at a competitive disadvantage with companies who flout the law,” they wrote. “The failure to confirm an EPA enforcement chief compounds these problems.”

The joint statement was signed by Lee M. ThomasWilliam K. ReillyCarol M. BrownerChristine Todd Whitman, and Lisa P. Jackson.

Climate policy hangs in the balance after Manchin upends talks
Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) speaks with members of the media at the Capitol.

Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) on Friday indicated that he is unwilling to strike a deal on new climate spending over inflation concerns, all but collapsing the Biden administration’s goal of quickly reducing the nations greenhouse-gas pollution. But as Congress remains in a gridlock, the planet continues to warm, Jonathan Weisman and Jazmine Ulloa report for the New York Times.

The move has frustrated many environmentalists and progressive Democrats who argue that sweeping action is necessary to avert existential disaster, with Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) saying that Manchin’s decision after months of negotiations was “nothing short of catastrophic.” Still, climate change remains an issue that has little power for either party in the face of a weakened economy, despite the nation being the second-largest emitter on Earth.

Meanwhile, Congress’s failure to secure concrete action on climate has not only wounded trust at home, but also abroad, Maxine Joselow and Brady Dennis reported for The Washington Post on Friday.

“U.S. climate envoy John F. Kerry speaks well about what needs to be done by all countries, but loses credibility whenever the U.S. is unable to deliver even the most modest actions that the U.S. government has promised,” Saleemul Huq, director of the International Center for Climate Change and Development in Bangladesh, said.

Pressure points
The U.S. plan to avoid extreme climate change is running out of time
A bathtub ring of light minerals shows the high-water line of Lake Mead.

The United States is falling incredibly short of President Biden‘s 2021 promise to slash emissions by 50 to 52 percent by the end of 2030 compared to 2005 levels, Chris Mooney and Harry Stevens report for The Post. But now, without a major spending package in Congress focused on climate, those emissions reductions are becoming virtually impossible.

The decision by Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) not to move forward with new climate spending “makes it harder, and it makes any additional actions by the executive branch that much more critical. The stakes are now that much higher,” said John Larsen, a partner with the Rhodium Group, a research firm that closely tracks emissions policies.

Several analyses have suggested that policies like those contained in the Senate legislation could have accounted for about a billion additional tons of annual U.S. emissions reductions.

When broken down, however, each of those tons connected to ambitious policy accounts for how much time small islands have to adapt to sea-level rise or whether the Arctic would still have sea ice in the summer, among other extreme events fueled by warming.

On the Hill this Week

On Tuesday: The House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources will hold a legislative hearing to examine four pending bills, including one to no longer allow mineral development on certain lands operated by the Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management.

  • The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee will meet to assess the authority of federal agencies to regulate the development of interstate hydrogen pipelines, storage, import and export facilities.
  • The House Oversight and Reform Subcommittee on the Environment will hold a hearing to discuss the role that agriculture can play in combating the climate crisis while increasing food production.

On Thursday: The House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water, Oceans, and Wildlife will hold a hearing to consider pending legislation, including a bill Introduced by Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) to reauthorize funding for the Bureau of Reclamation’s Climate Change and Water Program, which requires the agency to create strategies to mitigate the future impacts of global climate change on water resources.

Source

UK Government Admits 19 Million Brits Remain Unvaccinated & 30 Million Brits have Refused the COVID Booster Jab

UK Government Admits 19 Million Brits Remain Unvaccinated & 30 Million Brits have Refused the COVID Booster Jab

By The Exposé

Official figures published by the UK Government prove that the British public is being lied to about the effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections, and the true number of people who have refused them.

If you rewind to December 2021, you may remember an infamous headline published by Andrew Neil for the Daily Mail that read – ‘It’s time to punish Britain’s five million vaccine refuseniks: They put us all at risk of more restrictions’.

This headline is a beautiful example of how you have been lied to since the very beginning of the alleged Covid-19 pandemic.

Because according to the UK Government, 18.9 million people in England who are eligible for vaccination still remain unvaccinated, and 50% of the country has refused a third dose.

Yet despite this, another UK Government report confirms 94% of Covid-19 deaths have been among the vaccinated since the beginning of April 2022, and a shocking 90% of those deaths were among the triple/quadruple jabbed.

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) replaced Public Health England in the second half of 2021, and is sponsored by the Department for Health and Social Care and headed by Dr Jenny Harries.

The agency has been quietly publishing a weekly report titled ‘Weekly national Influenza and COVID-19 surveillance report’ that contains mountains of monotonous data. However, hidden deep within that report are the figures for Covid-19 vaccination uptake in England by dose.

The following table is taken from page 65 of the week 27 report, and shows vaccine uptake in England by age –

We’ve created the following chart based on the figures provided by UKHSA above, showing the total vaccination uptake vs the total vaccination refusal in England per dose –

According to the UKHA, 44.48 million people have had a single dose, 41.8 million people have had two doses, and 32.9 million people have had three doses as of July 3rd 2022.

According to the UKHSA’s own figures, 63.4 million people were eligible for vaccination at this point. Therfore, 18.9 million people have refused the Covid-19 vaccine in England and remain completely unvaccinated.

But on top of this a further 2.6 million have refused a second dose, meaning 21.5 million people are not double vaccinated, and 8.9 million people have refused a third dose, meaning 30.4 million people are not triple vaccinated.

Here’s how those figures equate in terms of percentages –

Thirty-percent of the population of England remains completely unvaccinated. 34% of the population of England are not double vaccinated. And 50% of the population are not triple vaccinated. This means England now has 30.4 million “Vaccine Refuseniks”. A figure that is 500% higher than the 5 million claimed by Andrew Neil in December 2021.

However, whilst these figures may be a cause for celebration for those who felt isolated and thought they were only one of a few who had refused the Covid-19 injection, it is terrible news for those who have succumbed to the lies and propaganda and had three or even four doses of the experimental jab.

This is because further UK Government data, quietly published just hours before Boris Johnson announced he was resigning as Prime Minister of the UK, reveals 94% of Covid-19 deaths since April have been among the vaccinated, and a shocking 90% of those deaths were among the triple/quadruple jabbed.

A UK Government agency, known as the Office for National Statistics (ONS), has just published data on deaths by vaccination status.

Table 1 of the latest dataet contains figures on the mortality rates by vaccination status for all cause deaths, deaths involving Covid-19, and deaths not involving Covid-19. And it is here that we are able to ascertain the vaccination status of everyone who has died of Covid-19 since the beginning of April 2022.

We’ve taken the figures provided by the ONS for both April and May 2022, and produced the following chart showing Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status in England between 1st April and 31st May 2022 –

In all, according to the ONS, there were 4,935 Covid-19 deaths over these two months, and the vaccinated population accounted for a shocking 4,647 of those deaths. But what’s even more shocking is that the triple vaccinated accounted for 4,216 of those deaths, with just 288 deaths recorded among the unvaccinated population.

The following chart shows the percentage of Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status in England between 1st April and 31st May 2022, according to the latest ONS dataset published just hours before Boris Johnson’s resignation –

The quietly published figures reveal that the vaccinated population as a whole accounted for a shocking 94% of all Covid-19 deaths in April and May 2022, with the unvaccinated accounting for just 6% of all Covid-19 deaths.

But the most horrific statistic here is that 90% of the deaths among the vaccinated were among people who had been given at least three doses of a Covid-19 injection, despite the fact just 50% of the population of England has had three doses of the Covid-19 injection.

You have been fed lie, after lie, after lie. There are now up to 30.4 million vaccine refusniks in England alone; not 5 million as was wrongly claimed by Andrew Neil, or 3 million as has been recently claimed in the past few weeks. And the official data proves that if you are one of them, you most definitely made the right decision.

Source

NZ Court Becomes Guardian of Baby Who Needs Urgent Heart Surgery

NZ Court Becomes Guardian of Baby Who Needs Urgent Heart Surgery


ER Editor: The mother of New Zealand baby, Will, needing heart surgery, simply wants her baby to have a blood transfusion of unvaccinated blood. Which seems reasonable given everything we know now about the Covid injections and what they do to the blood. But not to the New Zealand government and medical establishment. There ARE unvaccinated people lining up to donate for Will.

Here is a statement from the mother’s lawyer:

****

See also Steve Kirsch, who includes the court document and goes over the main arguments: New Zealand court takes custody of Baby Will

and Peter Halligan: Oh dear. Baby Will seized by the court and wil be subjected to blood transfusions possibly tainted by spike proteins. Such is State run health – the State and its organs (sic) own the people.

********

Court becomes guardian of baby who needs urgent heart surgery

Logan Church  LOGAN CHURCH for 1NEWS

A court has taken guardianship of a baby that needs heart surgery, after the parents refused to consent to the surgery unless the donated blood needed came from people who had not received the Covid-19 vaccine.

File image: A baby in hospital.

Te Whatu Ora Health NZ made an urgent application for guardianship under the Care of Children Act last week, with a hearing yesterday. Evidence was provided by Health NZ, the family, and the NZ Blood Service.

The hearing was initially scheduled for a half day but that blew out into almost a full day.

In a judgement released today by Justice Ian Gault about 6pm, he said the baby is under the court’s guardianship from today until completion of their surgery and post-operative recovery. The latest the order is in place is January 31, 2023.

Justice Gault said the baby’s doctors are to keep the baby’s parents informed “at all reasonable times of the nature and progress” of their child’s condition and treatment.

He remarked an order enabling the surgery to proceed using NZ Blood Service blood products “without further delay” is in the baby’s best interests.

Outside the court yesterday were up to 200 supporters of the family, many protesting the Covid-19 vaccine, mandates, new media organisations, the government, and the prime minister.

While most were peaceful, journalists and camera operators were harassed by some members of the crowd.

Several alternative media organisations had large banners of the child displayed, despite automatic suppression orders in place protecting the baby’s identity.

There were several police officers monitoring the protest, and security staff were monitoring who was going in and out of the courtroom.

In court, Te Whatu Ora’s lawyer, Paul White, said the organisation did not take a step like this lightly.

“His survival is dependent on the publication being granted,” White said.

“What we have are loving parents who love their child, with contrasting views to the medical professionals.”

The parents bought the baby to court with them, which White said was “against medical advice”.

He also said it was “curious” the parents took such a strong view on the blood needed for surgery, considering the mother had previously consented to blood from the general supply being used in an earlier surgery.

In response to that, Sue Grey, lawyer for the family, said they did not want the blood to be given, however given how the operation was going, they understood that it was needed.

“The fact they got away with it once doesn’t mean we should play blood roulette again,” she said.

She said there were up to 30 “pre-screened” unvaccinated donors ready to give blood, with some in the crowd outside court.

“It’s important to look at what can be done, not what has been done,” she said.

“What they’re effectively saying is you can have consent if you agree with us, but If you don’t agree with us, we will override your decision.

“It’s very clear that blood that’s contaminated is a risk to this baby.”

Lawyer for the NZ Blood Service, Adam Ross, strongly refuted any allegation the blood service had “contaminated blood”, a view shared by the medical community.

“I am concerned about the use of language in this case,” he said.

“The whole point here is that the NZ Blood Service is not distributing contaminated blood.”

************

Source

Featured image, Jacinda Ardern: Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Visit Original Source

We gotta ask: exactly how many people did the alleged SARS COV 2 virus actually kill?

We gotta ask: exactly how many people did the alleged SARS COV 2 virus actually kill?


In this featured article, the retired British statistician, John Dee, beginning the process of inviting us to take a close look at this crucial question:

Exactly how many people did the alleged SARS COV 2 virus actually kill?

And some are even asking:

Did it actually kill anybody?

It has already emerged, as the truth inevitably finds its way through the force screens of censorship and official disinformation, that the virus with which the government  managed to terrify the citizenry is much milder and less lethal than the propaganda would have us believe.

If you factor in the falsification of the fatality stats, the misuse of the fraudulent PCR test to inflate the numbers, the rebranding, as Dr Vernon Coleman has said, of influenza and similar ailments to lump them all under the Covid19 label, the Midazolam Murders in our cares homes and, as discussed below, iatrogenic deaths, it starts to look as if hardly anybody at all was actually killed by the alleged virus.

Or if they were, the true fatality stats were too low to justify the over-reaction that led to lockdowns and other catastrophes and the reckless rollout of grossly under-tested unsafe and ineffective pseudovaccines.

Meanwhile of course the pseudovaccines rolled out to protect us from an alleged virus that hardly killed anybody, (and probably nobody at all when not assisted by or taking the blame for government/medical ineptitudes of various kinds) are doing a far more deadly job than the “virus” ever did.

Just how many people did COVID actually and truthfully kill?

SOURCE

Get to know this word and what it means because this is where the revelations are going next, and it won’t be pretty.

Back on 25th March 2021 I first used the word when I wrote:

I don’t know about you folks but I’m getting an uneasy feeling that all these exploratory trials designed to test a raft of drug therapies to combat COVID-19 may have generated iatrogenic death on an unprecedented scale via high dose and cumulative toxicity leading to liver failure, sudden cardiac death and multi-organ failure.

This was a comment on the SOLIDARITY, DISCOVERY, RECOVERY, and REMAP drug trials in which incarcerated COVID patients became guinea pigs for a raft of experimental drugs.

Since then I’ve used the word ‘iatrogenic’ 13 times in various posts, which is not a good sign. In a nutshell, It means that a number folk likely died because of medical care, and in this we must include death due to lockdown and other policies as well as closure of health services.

A diabolical example of this is the inexplicable peak in non-COVID care home deaths back in spring 2020; a peak that hasn’t been matched since, and a peak that coincided with evacuation of the frail and elderly from hospital beds, leading to judicious use of end-of-life care pathways (I shall be revising this analysis shortly):

Several times since early 2021 I have questioned whether SARS-COV-2 could be considered as deadly as claimed and, on a couple of occasions, whether there was a virus circulating at all! This wasn’t the result of me wearing foil headgear but basic questioning of the narrative as a consequence of analyses that simply didn’t add up.

Jonathan Engler of HART fame has his sleeves rolled up on this topic and you may find these two articles a good introduction as to where he’s at:

The Lombardy Analysis

Were the unprecedented excess deaths curves in Northern Italy in spring 2020 caused by the spread of a novel deadly virus?

The dude Joel Smalley is similarly on a real roll with this, with the following two recent articles giving it both barrels and then some:

Did the COVID Virus Kill Anyone?

Iatrogenesis in England & Wales

Meanwhile back on the ranch yours truly is trying to find the 20 – 40 seriously quiet hours he needs to nail an iatrogenic harm model; that is, a statistical model that examines the harmful impact of policies, drugs and genetic therapies against a background of respiratory seasonality and incomplete processing of young deaths by the ONS (likely due to delays at the coroner’s end – young folk are not supposed to die).

BTW don’t confuse iatrogenic death with murder! We’re not talking about health professionals bumping people off to meet WEF targets. We’re talking about mistakes, errors of judgement, sloppiness, misdiagnosis, oversight, lack of care, inappropriate protocols and that sort of thing. Often it isn’t an individual at fault but the system of healthcare, which will include systems of patient management that should have been revised or dumped. Much of this can be avoided by regular critical review, which means challenging the status quo, going up against lead clinicians/managers, being open, being flexible and questioning policies across the range of disciplines.

This is some darn strange retirement.

Kettle On!


Visit People’s Media at Liberty Rising

www.strong-voices.net

This article is from UK Reloaded


••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

Here’s a list of 94 incidences this year when vast numbers of animals have died suddenly

Here’s a list of 94 incidences this year when vast numbers of animals have died suddenly

BY RHODA WILSON

Down the Chupacabra Hole has compiled a comprehensive list of incidences over the last 11 months where a large number of animals have died suddenly.  Below is that list of 94 incidences across the world where animals have died under unusual circumstances.

First a brief explanation of an event which caught the public’s attention earlier this year – 3,000 head died at one feedlot in South West Kansas and 10,000 died over the entire state.  Although this incident was due to a combination of factors, the final straw for the cattle was an unusual and rare weather phenomenon known as a “heat burst” or “heat index crisis.”

Peterson Farm Bros gave his initial thoughts on a Facebook post about the cattle in Kansas and the next day posted a video on YouTube explaining from his perspective what had happened to the cattle.

Peterson Farm Bros: Cattle Dead in SW Kansas, Some Context & What I Think Happened, 16 June 2022 (10 mins)

A veterinarian in the area, Tera Barnhardt, confirmed Peterson’s suspicions.  She posted on Facebook: “We had a natural disaster in Southwest Kansas on June 11th, 2022 and in the days that followed … There’s no mysterious disease or theory, we know exactly what happened. It’s called a heat index crisis.”  She explained further in a second Facebook post HERE.

The South West Kansas incidence is not on Down the Chupacabra Holes list but another 94 are, including incidences in Australia, UK, Panama and Kenya.

Millions of Livestock Animals Are Dying Suddenly: The War on Our Food Supply Continues

Republished from Down the Chupacabra Hole

Throughout 2022, inflation rates have soared to unprecedented levels. Prices of fuel, groceries, and housing continue to rise nearly every week. As working-class citizens struggle to afford necessities, the United States government is haemorrhaging billions of dollars overseas. Simultaneously, domestic supply chain issues are triggering rampant shortages and impacting countless consumers. More than one hundred food manufacturing facilities were suspiciously destroyed this year. To make matters worse, citizens must now brace for yet another unforeseen crisis. Millions of livestock, birds, and fish are dying under unusual circumstances. Could these bizarre deaths be mere coincidence or is something sinister unfolding behind the scenes?

When it comes to the food supply, our world is rapidly transforming. America is quickly moving towards mass-producing edible nanotechnology. Genetically modified chimeric meats fill the shelves of local stores. While Bill Gates accumulates vast amounts of agricultural land and independent farmers are under attack by “climate change” legislation, a series of peculiar fatalities is taking place. Vast numbers of cattle, pigs, chickens, and other animals are dropping dead at an alarming rate. Here is a chronological list that documents some examples of this disturbing phenomenon developing worldwide over the past 11 months.

Some of these incidents could be dismissed as mere chance. However, one can’t help but wonder: what is the statistical probability of these widespread catastrophes repeatedly transpiring? Coincidence is just that— certain concurrent events that occur at random. What is currently unfolding appears to be an intentional pattern of calculated actions. Modern warfare has evolved into much more insidious techniques. Weather modification, electromagnetic weapons, and bioterrorism are real threats. What better way to assault society than to go after the very essentials needed to sustain life? As Henry Kissinger once said: “Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people.”

Date Event
1 November 29 Dozens of cattle deaths baffle wildlife experts in Colorado, the United States.
2 November 24 Millions of chickens and turkeys die from an illness in the United States.
3 November 20 Tens of thousands of fish are ‘suffocating’ to death in New South Wales, Australia.
4 November 17 A new tick-borne disease is killing cattle throughout the United States.
5 November 17 Mass wildlife deaths from ‘overgrazing’ in Kenya leave millions on the brink of starvation.
6 November 10 Fire at a poultry farm kills 30,000 chickens in the Netherlands.
7 November 9 Hundreds of dead sea creatures wash up on the shores of Panama.
8 November 7 Avian flu kills hundreds of thousands of chickens, turkeys, ducks, and geese in Norfolk, England.
9 November 7 Hundreds of thousands of dead fish cover the coast of Huelva, Spain.
10 November 4 Catastrophic die-off of Dungeness crabs along the West Coast of the United States.
11 October 13 More than 1 billion snow crabs mysteriously vanished in the Bering Sea.
12 October 8 Severe weather kills tens of thousands of salmon in a single Canadian creek.
13 October 3 47 million birds were killed during an influenza outbreak in Europe.
14 October 3 50 million chickens and turkeys die from a sudden illness in the United States.
15 October 2 Herds of deer are being ravaged by an infectious disease throughout North America.
16 September 29 100,000 cows and buffalo died with 2 million sick from a viral disease in New Delhi, India.
17 September 27 Millions of birds die after contracting a disease United Kingdom.
18 September 23 A river in Boston, England is filled with hundreds of thousands of  fish carcasses.
19 September 22 Several tons of dead fish and crustaceans litter the UK shoreline.
20 September 21 Thousands of dead fish fill the waterways of Long Beach Island, New York.
21 September 21 Thousands of dead fish are scattered across the beaches of Portmore, Jamaica.
22 September 12 Over 67,000 cattle die throughout India due to a sudden illness.
23 September 2 Residents of Wichita, Texas encounter thousands of dead fish in a local lake.
24 September 1 Thousands of dead fish cover the shoreline in San Francisco, California.
25 August 30 Severe flooding claims the lives of 727,000 cattle in Pakistan.
26 August 26 Thousands of decomposing fish are discovered in Somerset, England.
27 August 22 Nearly 1,000 wild birds die from avian flu in Georgia, United States.
28 August 21 Tens of thousands of fish carcasses wash up on the beaches of West Sussex, England.
29 August 17 A river is filled with over 100 tons of dead fish in Poland.
30 August 8 Tens of thousands of fish are killed from ‘wildfires’ in California.
31 August 8 Thousands of fish are found deceased in New South Wales, Australia.
32 August 8 Thousands of dead fish wash up on the shores of Yucatan, Mexico.
33 July 25 More than 3,000 lifeless wild birds are uncovered on the Farne Islands.
34 July 23 1.5 million livestock animals are killed by droughts in Ethiopia.
35 July 22 Residents of Newfoundland, Canada discover thousands of dead birds.
36 July 20 Hundreds of deceased fish wash up on a beach in Cadiz, Spain.
37 July 17 ‘Heat stress’ is blamed for thousands of cattle deaths in Kansas, United States.
38 July 16 Thousands of dead birds are observed by crowds in Northumberland, England.
39 July 12 Locals in Staten Island, New York stumble upon thousands of dead fish.
40 July 10 Baltimore, Maryland’s Patapsco river fills with thousands of fish carcasses.
41 July 8 Hundreds of deceased birds are found on a beach in Aberdeenshire, Scotland.
42 July 3 Over 3,000 lifeless dolphins surface in the Black Sea of Russia.
43 July 2 Beachgoers in California stumble upon tens of thousands of rotting fish.
44 June 21 Locals in Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts encounter hundreds of dead sea birds.
45 June 16 10,000 cows died from ‘humidity’ in Kansas, United States.
46 June 8 Thousands of decomposing fish wash ashore on Lake Michigan.
47 June 8 Thousands of dead fish are found in a lake in Almerimar, Spain.
48 June 7 Villagers in Eastern Scotland find hundreds of expired birds on the beach.
49 June 6 More than 100,000 birds are dead after a storm in Allier, France.
50 June 2 Walkers discover hundreds of dead birds on the beaches of Puerto Piritu, Venezuela. June 1st: Hundreds of deceased birds are discovered in Quebec, Canada.
51 May 27 Over 300,000 salmon abruptly die at a fish farm in Chile.
52 May 26 massive die-off takes place at a New Zealand salmon farm.
53 May 24 100,000 dead fish strewn a river in Nova Scotia, Canada.
54 May 19 Contaminated water leads to authorities euthanizing 3,665 cattle in Clovis, New Mexico.
55 May 18 More than 5 tons of dead fish wash ashore in Guerrero, Mexico.
56 May 6 37 million chickens and turkeys die of a sporadic disease in the United States.
57 May 8 Hundreds of livestock animals were left dead after a fire in Virginia, United States.
58 April 28 Thousands of dead fish appear in the Tigris River in Turkey.
59 April 14 Hundreds of birds abruptly die in Illinois, United States.
60 April 10 A mass fish die-off takes place in Western Australia.
61 April 8 Thousands of dead and dying scallops fill a Florida beach.
62 April 4 An unprecedented sea urchin die-off occurs in the Caribbean.
63 April 1 Residents of Western Newfoundland, Canada come across hundreds of dying sea birds.
64 March 31 Influenza kills 12 million birds in France.
65 March 24 Several tons of dead fish fill the shores of Barra da Tijuca, Brazil.
66 March 22 Thousands of dead fish appear in Cox Bazar, Bangladesh.
67 March 18 85,000 birds are euthanized in South Dakota, United States.
68 March 17 ‘Flooding’ kills hundreds of thousands of fish in New South Wales, Australia.
69 March 15 Residents Fort-Dauphin, Madagascar find thousands of dead fish in a lake.
70 March 12 mass die-off of fish takes place at Cedar Lake in Indiana, United States.
71 March 8 2.8 million birds die suddenly in Iowa and Missouri, United States.
72 February 25 A river is filled with thousands of dead floating fish in Kolhapur, India. February 22nd: Tens of thousands of decomposing fish mysteriously wash up on a beach in Chile.
73 February 17 More than 100 birds suddenly drop dead while flying in St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
74 February 14 Thousands of dead fish and manta rays are found beached in Usulutan, El Salvador.
75 February 13 Over 15 tons of fish die from weather conditions in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
76 February 11 An ‘electric bang’ causes hundreds of birds to die in Pembrokeshire, Wales.
77 February 10 H5N1 claims the lives of 30,000 turkeys in Indiana, United States.
78 February 7 Hundreds of birds suddenly drop dead in Cuauhtemoc, Mexico.
79 February 6 Locals of Cumbria, England discover hundreds of dead birds along the shoreline.
80 February 2 A ‘heatwave’ kills 400,000 chickens in Uruguay.
81 January 30 Mass livestock deaths occur after a drought in Kenya.
82 January 27 Thousands of fish die from ‘cold temperatures’ in Greece.
83 January 26 Tens of thousands of goats and sheep die after a storm in Northern Kenya.
84 January 26 An unprecedented fish die-off takes place in Hokkaido, Japan.
85 January 24 Hundreds of dying birds cover the coastline in California, United States.
86 January 19 Hundreds of dead fish are discovered by beachgoers in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico.
87 January 18 Tens of thousands of dead fish cover the shoreline of Cruz del Eje, Argentina.
88 January 17 Several tons of dead fish appear in Houailou, New Caledonia.
89 January 14 Mass sea life die-off, “everything is dead for miles” in Yorkshire, England.
90 January 13 Thousands of dead fish are found floating in the Parana River in Argentina.
91 January 6 1 million chickens were killed by a disease in Lincolnshire, England.
92 January 5 Over one thousand dead bass mysteriously wash ashore in Nova Scotia, Canada.
93 January 5 Tens of thousands of dead starfish cover the beaches in Wales.
94 January 5 One million birds die of a sudden illness in the Netherlands.

Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)