The Insufferable Arrogance Of The … Constantly Wrong

The Insufferable Arrogance Of The … Constantly Wrong


The Insufferable Arrogance of the Constantly Wrong

By: Clayton Fox

The media, and the people who work in and around it, the Blue Checks™ of Twitter, have upped the ante over the past few years regarding how far they are willing to go to enforce various preferred narratives. 

Pick any major story of the past three years—e.g. Lab Leak, Jussie Smollett, Russiagate, Ukrainian Biolabs, Ivermectin, Hospitalizations From COVID v. With Covid, January 6th, ‘Transitory’ Inflation, and of course Hunter’s Laptop—and you will find absolutely hysterical narrative pushing up front followed by retractions, corrections, and outright denials as reality became undeniable. 

In the meanwhile, our civilization was ripped apart, our citizens were gaslit and impoverished, and in countries across the Western world, innocent people were removed from polite society, branded as lepers, and fired from their jobs. 

Why? Because there is one story that just won’t die and for which no corrections have been issued—the shibboleth that vaccination can prevent infection, transmission, and help “end” COVID.

While there is never an excuse for hateful rhetoric towards, and intervention in, the personal medical choices of law-abiding Americans, perhaps one could have, kinda sorta, understood the campaign if the new vaccines had provided long-lasting immunity and prevented community transmission. They do not. 

Early on we were told: “Nine out of ten [vaccinated] people won’t get sick” (Columbia University feat. Run-DMC, February 12th, 2021, no this is not a joke); “Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don`t get sick” (Dr. Rochelle Walensky, March 29th, 2021); “When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected” (Dr. Anthony Fauci, May 17th, 2021). 

And by mid-summer, 2021, we were still being told that unequivocally, these vaccines were a resounding success worthy of uncritical support. On July 27th in Scientific American, Dr. Eric Topol wrote, “Vaccination is the closest thing to a sure thing we have in this pandemic.” Not to be outdone, Dr. Anthony Fauci of the NIAID told CBS on August 1st, that the unvaccinated were responsible for “propagating this outbreak.” 

But on July 29th, 2021, the Washington Post reported a scoop that the CDC was privately acknowledging that the vaccinated could spread COVID as easily as the unvaccinated. Occasionally, they are forced to report inconvenient facts. And August 5th, CDC Director Walensky told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that, “They continue to work well for Delta, with regard to severe illness and death — they prevent it. But what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.”

While there is a mountain of medical literature available demonstrating quite clearly the failure of these vaccines to prevent infection and transmission, the August 5th declaration from the CDC Director should have made clear that being vaccinated is contributing in no way to the safety of others, nor to the eradication of this virus. 

In fact, Israeli Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz was even caught on tape in September of last year explaining that the use of the Israeli Green Pass wasn’t intended to make a difference epidemiologically, but because it would help convince people to get vaccinated. And even vaccine poobah Bill Gates admitted in a late 2021 interview, that, “We got vaccines to help you with your health, but they only slightly reduce the transmissions.”

So there should be no question that continuing to suggest in any way that these shots are a panacea, and that those who refused to get them were plague spreaders, should have been thoroughly trashed by Fall 2021. 

Nonetheless, on September 24th President Joe Biden coined his now famous phrase “a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” To our north, Prime Minister Trudeau called the unvaccinated science deniers, misogynists, and racists, and asked rhetorically whether Canadians should “tolerate” them.

And during the first week of January 2022, while kicking the unvaccinated out of French daily life and public spaces, French President Emmanuel Macron said he wanted the measures to “piss off” his unvaccinated citizens. With world leaders speaking this way, it’s no wonder so many Blue Check™ elites took up the banner!

Prominent media figures like Amy Siskind, Pulitzer Prize winner Gene Weingarten, and more have come out of the woodwork in recent months to share with us their enthusiasm for medical discrimination. Noted neurotic Howard Stern is all in on forced vaccination due to what must be his own debilitating fear of his mortality. Bill Kristol says the unvaccinated have “blood on their hands.”

David Frum, heir to Maimonides, writes, “Let the hospitals quietly triage emergency care to serve the unvaccinated last.” Charles M. Blow was “furious” at the unvaccinated. CNN contributor Dr. Leana Wen suggested that the unvaccinated should not be allowed to leave their homes. The Ragin’ Cajun even wants to punch the unvaccinated in the face!

All of the above links/stories were posted after Dr. Walensky’s unequivocal announcement that the vaccines do not prevent transmission.

And all of the self-satisfied segregationists are supported in their vitriol by the Blue Checks™ of the Medical Establishment, like Dr. Paul Klotman, President and Executive Dean of the Baylor School of Medicine, who said on camera back in January that he isn’t polite to friends and family who aren’t vaccinated. “Keep them away. I don’t do it respectfully, I tell them to stay away, and teach them a lesson.” Less vitriolic but equally problematic, the WHO’s COVID-19 “technical lead” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove continued to push the lie that vaccination can prevent outbreaks as recently as January 26th, 2022. She is, as well, a Blue Check™. And yes, Dr. Anthony Fauci is still at it, even as of April 14th, 2022, telling MSNBC that harsh Chinese lockdowns could be used to get the population vaccinated so that “When you open up, you won’t have a surge of infections.”

The examples are legion. Blue Checks, Medical Blue Checks, Times Columnists, Radio Jocks, Presidents, and Prime Ministers have all espoused misinformation and/or hate speech regarding vaccination status. But they are all given intellectual cover by the official reporting of the fourth estate. Even in the face of all the evidence that there is no epidemiological basis for discrimination, our intellectual betters in the legacy media press onward the canard.

On August 26th, the Toronto Star ran an article entitled, “When it comes to empathy for the unvaccinated, many of us aren’t feeling it.” Then, on December 22nd, published an explainer which stated that two doses won’t stop you from spreading COVID-19. Comme ci, comme ca.

Back in February, MSNBC political contributor Matthew Dowd shared his insight that the unvaccinated do not believe in the United States Constitution, because if they did, they would get vaccinated for “We The People.” For the common good.

An examination of the New York Times reveals three articles written this year which overtly continue supporting the idea that the vaccines prevent transmission. First, on January 29th in a piece entitled, “As Covid Shots For Kids Stall, Appeals Are Aimed At Wary Parents,” the author cites “public health officials” who say that to aid in “containing” the pandemic, kids must also be vaccinated. (It is worth mentioning that the current vaccines and boosters being distributed were designed in February 2020 to provide an immune response to a version of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein circulating prior to that, not entirely similar to what is circulating now.)

Then February 23rd, in a hit piece on the Surgeon General of Florida Dr. Joe Ladapo, the Times writes, “When public health officials across the country were urging vaccines as a way to end the pandemic, Dr. Ladapo was raising warning flags about possible side effects and cautioning that even vaccinated people could spread the virus.”

So, Dr. Ladapo was correct?

Finally, in a piece about Novak Djokovic published March 3rd, they write, “Djokovic was the only player ranked in the top 100 in Australia who had not received a Covid-19 vaccination, which experts have long said will not eradicate the virus unless most of the population receives one.”

They do not address the question of how a vaccine which does not prevent transmission can eradicate a virus. And they won’t. As Israeli Health Minister Horowitz candidly admitted, none of this is about epidemiology.

And even when mainstream media tacitly acknowledges the failures of the vaccines to prevent transmission, they skillfully elide the significance of this fact in order to allow them to continue to scapegoat the unvaccinated. In a dazzling display of sophistry, Time Magazine moved the Overton window in this January 12th, 2022 piece, “These Charts Show That COVID-19 Is Still A Pandemic of the Unvaccinated.”

The author states that due to the rapidly narrowing gap between cases in the vaccinated and unvaccinated, some readers might think that the phrase “pandemic of the unvaccinated” is no longer justifiable. But with the grace of a ballerina, Time goes on to tell us that because the vaccines are still showing efficacy against severe illness, the phrase is still kosher. If an unvaccinated person gets sicker than his vaccinated neighbor who contracted COVID at a fully vaccinated wedding, that unvaccinated person is still the problem!

New York Magazine isn’t lacking in similar gymnastics. On February 16th of this year, Matt Stieb published a piece entitled, “Is Kyrie Irving Going to Get Away With It?” Irving is the Brooklyn Nets player who famously chose not to be vaccinated, and has become a fetish object for the Covidian Left. Stieb acknowledges that Irving’s vaccinated teammates were getting COVID at such high rates that it forced Nets management to allow Irving back to play in away games but still calls the New York City ban on unvaccinated athletes “a rare public health mandate with real teeth.”

Just seven days later on February 23rd, Will Leitch, in the same publication, sighs, “Unfortunately, It’s Time to Let Kyrie Irving Play in New York.” He outlines all the reasons why epidemiologically it makes no sense to prevent athletes like Irving and Novak Djokovic from participating, but says, “It would feel like they got away with all their bullshit.” And also, they are “annoying.”

And this barely concealed hatred for the unvaccinated from media and government and Big Tech—even in the rare moments when writers such as Leitch acknowledge the failure of the vaccines to prevent transmission—has real consequences. People have lost their jobs. People have been arrested for trying to go to a movie theater.

Families got kicked out of restaurants, and patrons either cheered or remained indifferent, which is worse. A teenage boy at an uber-progressive and expensive Chicago prep school committed suicide after being bullied over an incorrect rumor he was unvaccinated. The stench of bad journalism rots people’s basic decency.

A January Rasmussen poll found that, “Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Democratic voters would favor a government policy requiring that citizens remain confined to their homes at all times, except for emergencies, if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine…Forty-five percent (45%) of Democrats would favor governments requiring citizens to temporarily live in designated facilities or locations if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine…”

As well as, “Twenty-nine percent (29%) of Democratic voters would support temporarily removing parents’ custody of their children if parents refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine.” Unfortunately, these disturbing results are politically lopsided, but it’s no surprise when you consider who the readers of most legacy media platforms are.

The saddest thing is that these media outlets and their flag bearers really think their readers are all morons. The New York Times believes that, in the midst of the Omicron wave as boosted person after boosted person was getting COVID, they could tell you these particular vaccines are still the way to eradicate this thing, and expect you to deny reality and nod your head.

It calls to mind the quote attributed to Solzhenitsyn (or Elena Gorokhova), “The rules are simple: they lie to us, we know they’re lying, they know we know they’re lying, but they keep lying to us, and we keep pretending to believe them.”

We have ceded the better angels of our common cerebrum to people who may not have our best interests at heart, and a sycophantic laptop class who gleefully endorses their diktats and “fact-checks.” Collectively: Sophistry Inc.

Their behavior, endorsed by every single entity which holds power in our society, is destroying us, and has already poisoned us such that there may be no antidote. Yes, first they came for the unvaccinated, but that doesn’t mean they won’t come for you next.

••••

This article (The Insufferable Arrogance of the Constantly Wrong) was published on the website BROWNSTONE INSTITUTE and is republished with permission and attribution to the author Clayton Fox and brownstone.org.

About the above articles Author: Clayton Fox was a 2020 Tablet Magazine Fellow. He has been published at Tablet, Real Clear Investigations, Los Angeles Magazine, and JancisRobinson.com.

••••

Read more articles COVID Vaccines & Mandates

••••

Click the image below to visit this new site:

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

Texas Supreme Court Allows Abortion Ban to Go into Effect 

Texas Supreme Court Allows Abortion Ban to Go into Effect 

The Texas Supreme Court reversed a lower court on Friday evening and allowed a pre-Roe 1925 law prohibiting abortions to go into effect.

The state supreme court’s order is the latest addition in an ongoing feud between Texas government officials and abortion providers following the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Although the 1925 law prohibiting abortions was not enforced after Roe was decided in 1973, the law remained on the books. A Harris County judge temporarily blocked the abortion ban after abortion clinics sued. The abortion clinics argued the law was effectively repealed when the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, but the Texas Supreme Court disagreed and allowed the pre-Roe ban to go into effect.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton applauded the court’s decision as a “Pro-life victory!”

“Pro-life victory! Thanks to my appeal, SCOTX has slapped down the abortion providers and the district court carrying their water,” Paxton tweeted. “Our state’s pre-Roe statutes banning abortion in Texas are 100% good law. Litigation continues, but I’ll keep winning for Texas’s unborn babies.”

Paxton declared an annual holiday within the state attorney general’s office on the day the Supreme Court overturned Roe. 

“Abortion is now illegal in Texas. And today I’m closing my office—and making it an annual holiday—as a memorial to the 70 million lives lost because of abortion,” Paxton said.

Shortly after the Supreme Court’s decision, Planned Parenthood stopped performing abortions in Texas after Paxton warned that some prosecutors might choose to enforce the pre-Roe abortion ban.

Paxton said:

Some prosecutors may choose to immediately pursue criminal prosecutions based on violations of Texas abortion prohibitions predating Roe that were never repealed by the Texas Legislature. Although these statutes were unenforceable while Roe was on the books, they are still Texas law. Under these pre-Roe statutes, abortion providers could be criminally liable for providing abortions starting today.

Texas is one of several states with a “trigger law” that would criminalize performing abortions 30 days after the Supreme Court overturned Roe.

Texas’s trigger law, signed by Gov. Greg Abbott in June 2021, is set to go into effect at the end of July.

“Texas is a pro-life state, and we have taken significant action to protect the sanctity of life,” Abbot said after the Supreme Court’s decision.

Texas was the first state in the nation to enact a “heartbeat law” last September that would ban abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected.

Source

Congress quietly Bans Federal Funds from labs in China, Russia and Iran

Congress quietly Bans Federal Funds from labs in China, Russia and Iran


Congress quietly Bans Federal Funds from labs in China, Russia and Iran

Vote is latest action to acknowledge that theory that COVID-19 leaked from Wuhan research lab — once censored as preposterous and by news organizations, social media giants — is viable enough for government to vote with its pocketbook

By John Solomon

While U.S. intelligence has been unable in two years to determine for sure if COVID-19 leaked from a Chinese lab, Congress has decided it no longer wants to take the risk of funding medical research at labs controlled by Beijing or other American adversaries.

With little fanfare and in bipartisan fashion, House appropriators quietly amended the 2023 federal budget for health and science agencies on Thursday to ban any funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which U.S. intelligence fears may have been the origin point for the coronavirus pandemic, and other labs like it.

“None of the funds made available by this Act may be made available to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, or any other laboratory located in a country determined by the Secretary of State to be a foreign adversary, including China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran,” reads the amendment approved by the House Appropriations Committee.

You can read the amendment here:

The vote is the latest official government action to acknowledge that the theory that COVID-19 leaked from the Wuhan research lab — once panned as preposterous and censored by news organizations and social media giants — is viable enough for the government to vote with its pocketbook.

After more than a year of ridicule, the lab leak theory was officially recognized by the Biden administration’s intelligence apparatus as one of the two most viable explanations for the appearance of coronavirus, with the other being natural evolution.

The lab leak theory got even more credence last month when the World Health Organization, the United Nations body that first dismissed the lab leak theory, admitted there was “new evidence” supporting the theory that needed investigating.

WHO said on June 10 that  “key pieces of data” to explain how the pandemic began were still missing and that it must “remain open to any and all scientific evidence that becomes available in the future to allow for comprehensive testing of all reasonable hypotheses.”

The announcement by WHO led House Republicans to cheer. “Americans were smeared as ‘conspiracy theorists’ for asking whether #COVID19 came from a lab leak,” they tweeted. “Now, the WHO is asking the same questions.”

The Appropriations Committee action on Thursday was praised by Rep. Lisa McClain (R-Mich.), a member of the House Education and Labor Committee who sponsored the amendment over national security concerns and the fact that many foreign labs conduct abusive experiments on animals.

“Our tax dollars should never go to countries that threaten our national security,” she said. “We’ve seen how dangerous it is to fund research at the Wuhan Lab in China. I’ve been leading efforts to defund animal labs in China, Russia and other foreign adversaries and I’m proud that the House Appropriations Committee adopted an amendment supporting my efforts to prevent taxpayers’ money from being sent to labs in these countries.”

Also applauding the action was the nonprofit group White Coat Waste Project, which earlier this year revealed that 32 animal labs in Russia and China were eligible to receive taxpayer dollars via the National Institutes of Health and that one in Russia was involved in a cruel experiment on cats.

“A majority of Americans agree that taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to pay white coats in foreign labs to torture animals in dangerous and wasteful experiments,” said the group’s Senior Vice President Justin Goodman. “Having first exposed NIH funding for animal labs in China and Russia — including the notorious Wuhan Institute of Virology — we applaud Republicans and Democrats on the Appropriations Committee for their historic move to defund wasteful spending in dozens of animal testing labs run by our enemies.”

***********

(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News.  Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News

Header featured image (edited) credit:  Lab/Orginal article Just the News

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

Hero of the Evolution Vladimir Zelenko

Hero of the Evolution Vladimir Zelenko


The following is from the World Council for Health, written in memory of Vladimir Zelenko, who has died of cancer.

The world has lost a true Freedom Fighter but his example has inspired and empowered countless others.

Fighting selflessly  for truth and liberty to the end, Dr Zelenko was a true hero of the evolution who, when the last enemy attack on our civilisation finally expires, will be remembered with admiration and gratitude.

Dr. Valadimir “Zev” Zelenko passed away today, leaving behind a legacy of helping others in the fight against Covid-19.Image

Dr. Zelenko was a physician, scientist, and activist for medical rights. He is most recognized for his safe and practical application of a novel three-drug combination of hydroxychloroquine, zinc sulfate, and azithromycin to combat Covid-19 in prehospital settings.

Dr. Zelenko graduated with a B.A. degree in Chemistry from Hofstra University with high honors. In May 2000, he earned his M.D. degree after receiving an academic scholarship to attend S.U.N.Y at Buffalo School of Medicine. Dr. Zelenko completed his residency in family medicine at South Nassau Communities Hospital in Oceanside, N.Y. in May 2004. Since then, Dr. Zelenko has worked in the Hudson Valley of New York as a family doctor.

In March 2020, Dr. Zelenko’s team was one of the first in the country to successfully treat thousands of Covid-19 patients in the prehospital setting. While battling recurrent and metastatic sarcoma, recovering from open-heart surgery, and undergoing aggressive chemotherapy, Dr. Zelenko developed his now-famous “Zelenko Protocol,” which has saved lives all around the world.

In December 2020, Zelenko with co-authors published an article on a retrospective case study of outpatient treatment with zinc, low-dose hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, which indicated a significant reduction in the incidence of hospitalization of COVID-19 patients that had been treated with the protocol, 2.8% treated compared with 15.4% untreated.

Zelenko was also a courageous advocate and defender of fundamental principles of medicine. He persevered against unrelenting defamation of character from the media, and threats against his person. Dr. Zelenko was an observant orthodox Jew, and was married with 8 children, and has authored two books called Metamorphosis and Essence to Essence.

The World Council for Health is saddened by the news of Dr. Zelenko’s passing, following his long battle with cancer. He was a passionate and dedicated doctor who fought tirelessly for his patients. We will remember him for his courage and determination in the face of adversity. Our thoughts are with his family, patients, and friends at this difficult time.

“I have looked death in the eye and I have been made ready to meet God. I fear nothing on this earth.”

Dr. Zelenko


Visit People’s Media at Liberty Rising

www.strong-voices.net

This article is from UK Reloaded


••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

Austrian Minister of Health Confirms – Doctors Are Responsible for Vaccine Damage

Austrian Minister of Health Confirms – Doctors Are Responsible for Vaccine Damage


••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Visit Original Source

Dr Vladimir Zelenko from his hospital bed – The WORLD needs a CLEANING – So Let the CULLING Begin

Dr Vladimir Zelenko from his hospital bed – The WORLD needs a CLEANING – So Let the CULLING Begin

XANDREWX – June 30th, 2022

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

Joe Biden Rages at ‘Extremist’ Supreme Court; Admits Democrats Do Not Have the Votes to Make Abortion Legal Nationwide

Joe Biden Rages at ‘Extremist’ Supreme Court; Admits Democrats Do Not Have the Votes to Make Abortion Legal Nationwide

President Joe Biden on Friday again expressed his outrage at the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and pleaded for Americans to elect more Democrats in November.

“I share the public’s outrage at this extremist court,” Biden said, describing the Supreme Court’s ruling last week as a “tragic” and a “terrible, extreme decision.”

The president held a video conference call with Democrat governors to discuss the importance of preserving the “right” for women to abort their unborn children. In the past week, Biden has been under fire from leftist Democrats and pro-abortion activists who are displeased by his lack of fervor on the issue.

Biden again vowed to do “everything within the power of the federal government” to protect the right for women to seek abortions in other states but said that it was up to Congress to pass a law to make abortion legal across the United States.

“Ultimately, Congress is going to have to act to codify Roe into federal law,” Biden said. “As I said yesterday, the filibuster should not stand in the way of us being able to do that, but right now we don’t have the votes in the Senate to change the filibuster at the moment.”

Biden noted that two more Democrats were needed to codify Roe v. Wade in the United States Senate as well as a Democrat majority in the House of Representatives.

The president said it was more important than ever to elect members of Congress who would be willing to act to make abortion legal nationwide.

“This is not over,” he said.

Biden also stressed the need for more government funding for “family planning.”

“Not for abortion but for family planning,” he clarified.

The president indicated that Americans would be “shocked” by the ramifications of the Supreme court’s decision, warning of states prosecuting women who traveled to other states to get abortions.

“I don’t think people believe it’s going to happen but it’s going to telegraph to the whole country that this is a gigantic deal that affects all of your basic rights,” he warned.

Source

US Federal Court Rules Death Caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 2)

US Federal Court Rules Death Caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 2)


US Federal Court Rules Death caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 2)

(To read part Part 1 before continuing see link below article)

By TLB Contributing Partner: Christina England, BA, Hons

This case is one of many from Shattered Dreams the HPV Vaccine Exposed.

Mrs Tarsell Takes the Case to Court

To medically investigate and support her claim, Emily’s attorney asked leading cardiologist and electrophysiologist, Professor Michael Eldar, M.D., FACC, FESC, FHRS, and leading immunologist, Professor Yehuda Shoenfeld, MD, FRCP, MaACR, to examine her daughter’s case in detail.

Tarsell vs. Department of Health and Human Services for the Death of Christina from Gardasil

Emily explained:

Four experts, two representing our family and two representing the government, attorneys for the respective sides and myself testified at the hearing on November 13-14, 2014. Special Master Christian Moran presided over the hearing. In the “vaccine court” there is no judge or jury.

Since there were no structural problems with Chris’s heart as confirmed by an earlier echocardiogram and by the coroner’s report, the problem was likely due to a disturbance in the rhythm of the heart, which is regulated by an electrophysiological process. Dr. Michael Eldar is a world-class expert in this field. Excerpts from his testimony and that of the other experts follow.”

The questions posed by Dr. Eldar were:

  1. What was the nature of the arrhythmia found in the ECG tracings of Christina Tarsell?

  1. Could this arrhythmia have caused her sudden death?”

The answers, according to Dr. Eldar’s report, were as follows:

  1. The arrhythmia was RVOT VPCs.

  1. The RVOT VPCs are the probable cause of death of Christina Tarsell.”

Emily explained to us that:

Regarding the nature of the arrhythmia, both the expert cardiologist representing the government, Dr. Scott Yeager, and Dr. Eldar agreed on review of Chris’s ECGs that the arrhythmia was of the type ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) rather than premature atrial contractions (PACs) as originally diagnosed by her primary care doctor.”

Dr. Eldar wrote:

Dr. Yeager reviewed the ECGs and he diagnosed the premature beats as ventricular premature complexes (VPCs), rather than PACs, originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). I examined two ECGs, recorded on November 20, 2007, and December 27, 2007, and I agree with the diagnosis of Dr. Yeager.”

Dr. Eldar continued that:

Dr. Yeager claims that this type of arrhythmia is common in adolescents and states that this type of VPCs is “usually felt to be at quite low risk, and may even be cleared for competitive athletics.” (Page 6)

While this claim is true for many cases of RVOT VPCs, it is definitely not true for all of them.”

He explained that whilst this information is true, there are different types of RVOT VPCs with different morphologies, and the type seen in Christina’s ECGs was consistent with types seen in people with normal hearts who developed life-threatening arrhythmia. This type is described in the literature as “malignant” RVOT VPCs. After giving several examples from papers that supported his claim, Dr. Eldar wrote:

In summary: the VPCs in the ECG tracings of Christina Tarsell were very similar in their form and in their CI to those described as malignant RVOT VPCs in the above mentioned studies.”

Dr. Eldar argued that the RVOT VPCs were the probable cause of Christina’s death. Furthermore, he pointed out that, in fact, Dr. Yeager had not actually denied that there was a possible causative connection between the VPCs and the sudden death of Christina, because in his report, Dr. Yeager had written that:

“It is impossible to know the role, if any, of this patient’s ventricular ectopy in her subsequent sudden death … Nonetheless, I find it difficult to discount her prior history of ventricular arrhythmia in light of her subsequent death, and I am suspicious that more detailed evaluation would have revealed a concerning pattern of ectopy, but I am by no means certain of a direct association.”

Regarding a temporal relationship between the vaccination and the onset of an arrhythmia, the medical records had revealed that Christina’s health only deteriorated after she had received the HPV vaccination, Gardasil.

In fact, the first time that her symptoms were recorded was after she had received her first shot of Gardasil and, according to reports, her symptoms increased with each subsequent Gardasil vaccination.

Dr. Eldar concluded that:

  1. Christina Tarsell’s arrhythmia was not documented before her first Gardasil shot.

  2. The erroneous interpretation of the premature beats as PACs rather than VPCs made them seem of low clinical importance. If properly diagnosed, a more thorough medical investigation (including stress test and a Holter monitor) might have revealed a more significant type of arrhythmia. This theory is also alluded to by Dr. Yeager in his report.

  3. I have shown that RVOT VPCs with the characteristics found in the present case are capable of triggering fatal arrhythmias (either VF or polymorphic VT) in apparently healthy individuals.

In conclusion, I find it more likely than not that the RVOT VPCs were the trigger of the sudden death of Christina Tarsell.”

While both experts agreed on the type of arrhythmia that Christina had experienced, the question remained as to whether her arrhythmia was induced by vaccination, and if so, by what mechanism?

This was addressed in full by Emily’s other expert, immunologist Dr. Yehuda Schoenfeld, with supporting testimony from Dr. Eldar.

Further Evidence That Gardasil Caused Christina Tarsell’s Death

Dr. Schoenfeld first challenged an opinion that had been submitted by Dr. Yeager, that perhaps Christina had inherited an undetected hereditary arrhythmia syndrome.

Dr. Schoenfeld wrote:

On page 4, Dr. Yeager states his opinion that the most probable reason for Christina’s sudden death was an undetected hereditary (genetic) arrhythmogenic syndrome. He provides no evidence to support his view.”

Dr. Schoenfeld continued:

With all due respect, but beliefs do not constitute as evidence in a court of law. Moreover, if there was history of genetic arrhythmogenic syndrome in the Tarsell family, it would be obvious, as such genetic abnormalities manifested in sudden death of relatives. In other words, they do not remain hidden and Christina’s death, in such case, would not have been the first.”

Emily reported to the court, that there was no family history of arrhythmia, sudden deaths from arrhythmia, or indeed any other form of heart disease. She explained what happened as Dr. Schoenfeld presented his testimony:

Dr. Schoenfeld then addressed the biologically possible mechanism at the cellular level by which the vaccine could cause death. The process is called molecular mimicry and it happens when proteins in HPV vaccines share a similarity with one’s own protein. The antibodies induced by the vaccine get confused and direct their attack to one’s own proteins as well as the intended HPV target.

Dr. Schoenfeld discovered a research paper which showed that the L1HPV 16 protein in Gardasil was similar to the the L-type calcium channel receptor in the heart. In certain individuals, the body then mounts an immune response to both the L-1 protein and L-type calcium channel receptor resulting in cross-reactivity and an autoimmune response.”

She explained that:

In summarizing the mechanism, attorney Mark Sadaka reiterated what Dr. Schoenfeld had written. He stated that:

Autoantibodies bound to the L-type calcium channels in Christina’s heart making them dysfunctional resulting in an influx of calcium into the heart cells. The increased concentration of calcium in the heart cells caused her ventricular premature contractions which led to her death. After each additional Gardasil vaccination, more calcium entered the heart resulting in a worsening of her arrhythmia and ultimately her death.”

Dr. Schoenfeld’s proposed mechanism was further supported by Dr. Eldar, who stated that:

Based on my previous report (14/7/2014) and the report of Dr.Yeager, (23/4/2014) the death of Christina Tarsell was caused by fatal ventricular arrhythmia related to the RVOT VPCs recorded previously in 2 ECG tracings. Gardasil, by causing increased L-type Ca current (Prof. Shoenfeld’s supplemental report), may be implicated in causing the RVOT VPCs, which triggered the ventricular arrhythmia that caused the premature death of Christina Tarsell.”

Emily told us that:

The expert immunologist for the government was S. Michael Phillips, M.D., F.A.C.P, whose main argument was to refute a link between Chris’s death and Gardasil vaccination, based on epidemiology and was summarized and addressed by Dr. Schoenfeld, who stated:

On page 6, Dr. Phillips addresses the question regarding Gardasil, and whether this vaccine might have triggered the sudden unexpected death in Christina’s case. He comes to the conclusion that Gardasil can be excluded as a possible trigger because in his review of the relevant literature, Dr. Phillips found no evidence of an increased signal of such adverse events linked to Gardasil vaccination. He cites the fact that thus far, 100 million doses of Gardasil have been distributed worldwide and if there was a real risk of sudden deaths, vaccine surveillance safety programs would have picked it up by now. However, it should be noted that for any vaccine the number of doses that are eventually administered is much lower than the number of doses that are distributed. Thus, calculations based on the latter tend to underestimate the rate of vaccine-associated adverse events. Supporting this interpretation, it was previously shown that for any of the two HPV vaccines currently on the market, the reported rate of adverse reactions per 100,000 doses administered was very similar across different countries and approximately 7 times higher than that calculated from the number of distributed doses. Moreover, given that worldwide, vaccine surveillance programmes routinely rely on passive reporting, the rate of rare but nonetheless serious adverse events causally linked to HPV vaccination might have escaped detection. The fact again remains that a previously healthy young woman died from a cardiac arrest, less than 3 weeks following her 3rd dose of Gardasil, thus in clear temporal relationship with the administration of the vaccine. The analysis of U.S. VAERS data by Slade et al. shows that there were reports of sudden unexpected deaths following Gardasil and although the signal for sudden deaths was not significant, a notable proportion of these events were due to cardiac abnormalities and their temporal relationship with the HPV vaccine falls within the same time-frame as in Christina’s case (less than 3 weeks following vaccination).”” (emphasis added)

Dr. Shoenfeld concluded by summarising that the evidence presented over two days of testimony had satisfied all three prongs stipulated by the Court of Federal Claims to win a judgment: He stated that:

In conclusion, as I stated previously in my report, in Christina Tarsell’s case we have:

(1) a medically plausible mechanism of cause and effect showing that the vaccination could have caused the injury;

(2) a clear temporal relationship between vaccination and injury (3 weeks);

(3) previous precedents where the same vaccine caused the same type of injury and within the same timeframe [2] and finally;

(4) lack of any reasonable alternative causes that could explain her condition.

Therefore, it is more likely than not that Gardasil was the cause of the tragic death of Christina Tarsell.”

The evidence presented to the court from both of these experts was supported by reams of published, peer-reviewed papers, medical records, numerous expert reports, decades of experience and thousands of hours of work, and it appeared that the government had no alternative explanation for what had happened to Christina.

This made the experts’ evidence all the more compelling. Therefore, it would have been easy at this stage to presume that Emily and her team had met their burden of proof.

However, as Emily would soon discover, it would take more than two of the world’s leading experts armed with an arsenal of evidence to persuade the vaccine court’s Special Master that the HPV vaccine was responsible for Christina’s death.

Death from Gardasil Litigation Continues in the US Court of Federal Claims

Emily told us that:

Special Master Moran rendered a decision on February 16, 2016, a year and three months after the hearing. Astonishingly, he ruled against us by ignoring the evidence.”

Emily explained to us that:

In the Court of Federal Claims, when a decision by the Special Master is contested, the plaintiff can appeal to a higher authority.”

She told us that she and her team were appalled that Moran had ignored and misinterpreted important evidence and testimonies written by experts.

She stated that:

Attorney Sadaka filed an appeal on March 16, 2016, that was strongly critical of Special Master Moran for “egregious distortions” and judgments that were “arbitrary and capricious” and “deprived the petitioner of a fair hearing.” What happened next was precedent-setting.”

Emily explained that:

The case then went to a judge and was assigned to Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. The judge reviewed all of the evidence and filed her decision on June 30, 2017, more than a year after receiving the case. The Judge wrote a 22-page critic of the ruling made by Special Master Moran. She cited instances where the Special Master had ignored critical evidence and made multiple errors of judgment and errors of law. Judge Coster Williams then  remanded the case back to Special Master Moran and directed him to consider all of the evidence and the rules of law in the “vaccine court.””

In Judge Coster Williams’ report [4], she made her views on the Tarsell case perfectly clear. One of the key points of contention was whether or not Christina’s arrhythmia had existed prior to her receiving the vaccination.

In his ruling, the Special Master had stated that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate that the arrhythmia had not existed before the vaccination, and he had appeared to have ignored all the evidence that the Tarsell family had submitted.

In her report, Judge Coster Williams stated:

“… the Special Master ignored medical record evidence from Christina’s treating physicians that showed she did not have arrhythmia prior to her vaccine.”

On page 21 of her extremely thorough report, Judge Coster Williams concluded that:

Petitioner’s motion for review is GRANTED. The Special Master’s decision denying compensation is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the Special Master for further proceedings consistent with this decision. The Court makes no factual findings of its own.

On remand the Special Master shall reassess whether Petitioner met Althen’s Prongs One, Two and Three and whether she is entitled to compensation, consistent with the legal principles articulated in this opinion.”

Emily explained that:

The truth is that all experts agreed that Christina died from an arrhythmia and her 20-year medical history was extensively reviewed by Judge Coster Williams, who cited 30 specific medical appointments which show that arrhythmia was not reported prior to vaccination (tabulated on page 22 of the Judge’s report).”

Secondly, the Judge determined that we had met our burden of proof regarding a “biologically plausible” theory causally connecting the vaccination with the injury. “Biologically plausible” is the legal standard in the vaccine court.

Thirdly, the Judge also instructed the Special Master to consider the evidence for Challenge-Rechallenge which he had ignored. In short, on remand, the SM was instructed to “consider all evidence on a logical sequence of cause and effect linking Gardasil and Christina’s death.”

On remand, the Special Master Moran followed the legal directives which led him to reverse his decision. He then ruled that we had indeed met our burden of proof for the court of Federal Claims and were entitled to compensation.”

Special Master Moran’s second and final ruling was filed on September 25, 2017. He wrote:

The undersigned finds that the challenge-rechallenge evidence is sufficiently probative that this presentation carries Ms. Tarsell’s burden of proof.”

He continued that:

Ultimately, because of the finding that Christina began to experience arrhythmia after her HPV vaccination, Ms. Tarsell has presented preponderant evidence of a logical sequence of cause and effect, connecting the HPV vaccination to the ensuing arrhythmia.”

He concluded:

The Court’s Opinion and Order required additional consideration consistent with the legal principles articulated by the Court for analyzing the evidence in this tragic case about a woman, Christina Tarsell, who died much too young. Under the approach dictated by the Court, Ms. Tarsell is entitled to compensation. The parties should anticipate that a separate order regarding damages will issue shortly.”

Emily explained how she felt after the Special Master had made his final decision:

The first sense of justice, joy and relief came when Judge Coster Williams considered our evidence and validated our appeal. That was just awesome and restored my faith in the legal process. We anticipated at that point that the Special Master would reverse his decision since he was basically over ruled by a higher authority. However, there was still one more hurdle before we could declare victory. The government had a window of opportunity to appeal the final decision by the Special Master. It is very telling that the government did not appeal the final decision. Their opportunity to appeal expired on March 30, 2018, eight years after the case was filed. By not appealing, the government (HHS) thereby conceded that we had proved by preponderance of evidence that Gardasil vaccinations killed Christina.

Speaking of a higher authority, from the moment I realized that Gardasil killed Chris, I felt that I was summoned by a Higher Consciousness for a mission on behalf of my daughter and others injured by the vaccine. Sometimes we don’t choose our battles; they choose us. This was before I had an attorney or experts and I had to trust that the path to truth would unfold.

Amazingly, the right people, the right attorney, the right science and scientists, and the right judge all coalesced for the truth to prevail. So the victory was also a validation of my faith.

It has been difficult. In addition to loosing my only child whom I loved with all of my heart, I have been viciously attacked on media and even privately, quietly dismissed by some from whom I expected support. So having the truth validated by the legal system is a big crack in the wall of denial regarding Gardasil-induced injuries and death.

There are those who will try to cover up or minimize the crack or distract you with lies and bribes for their own selfish or naive reasons. So, the “battle” is not over ,but our victory is precedent-setting because it is the first Gardasil death case to win a judgment.

My heart goes out to all of the thousands of families whose beautiful children have died or been seriously injured by HPV vaccinations. Some cases have prevailed in the vaccine court in the US and in other courts across the world. But most people don’t know about their legal options or learn too late after the statute of limitations had expired. Others are blocked from justice by the barriers of discovery and other systemic impediments.

I feel gratitude that Chris’s Gardasil-induced death case was not just swept under the carpet. Her favorite sport was baseball and with her win, she has scored a huge home run. I’m still on deck and ready to go to bat to save lives.”

Through dogged determination, perseverance, blood, sweat and tears and with truth on their side, Emily and her exceptional team, Attorney Sadaka, Dr. Eldar and Dr. Schoenfeld, prevailed.

This case was never about financial gain. They knew Emily would not settle. This case was always about getting justice for Christina and holding the government accountable for HPV vaccine deaths and injuries.

Christina is sadly just one of a growing number of individuals who have lost their lives after receiving a vaccine that has been deemed safe and effective by governments from around the world. By proving with preponderance of evidence that this vaccine was responsible for Christina’s death, Ms. Tarsell has paved the way for others to get the justice they deserve.

We would like to thank Ms. Tarsell for her bravery, for allowing us to read her daughter’s reports and for agreeing to participate in this book.

••••

References

  1. World Health Organisation (WHO) VigiAccess database. Accessed August 13, 2018. Available here

  2. Lyons-Weller, James. Who and What Killed Christina Tarsell # NotOneMore. Mercury Project. 2018. Available here

  3. Human Resources and Services Administration. National Injury Compensation Progam, Official Website. Available here

  4. Coster Williams, Mary Ellen, Judge. United States Court of Federal Claims. June 2017. Available here

  5. Moran, Christian J. Special Master. United States Court of Federal Claims. September 2017. Available here

••••

US Federal Court Rules Death Caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 1)

••••

Read more articles by Christina England

••••

Note from Christina:

Arlo was rescued from Romania when he was just six months old, after being born with deformed front legs and dumped outside a railway station.

I have been fostering him for the past year and after a massive fundraising effort, have raised enough money to have surgery to straighten his left leg and fuse his wrist.

This surgery was performed last week and was a great success. However, this has left him lopsided and he now needs similar surgery on his right leg.

Please donate anything that you can to help this darling little boy to stand tall and walk on all four legs for the first time. Thank you.

Please consider donating through my fundraiser, where you can see more of his story.

Or through my PayPal christina128@live.co.uk

Thank you.

••••

About the Author: Christina England, BA Hons, Research Journalist and Author

Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. She left school to work in a children’s library, specialising in storytelling and book buying. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980.

After taking an A Level in Psychology and a BTEC in Learning Support, Ms. England spent many years researching vaccines and adverse reactions. She gained a Higher National Diploma in Journalism and Media Studies in 2010 and in 2016 she gained a BA Hons degree in Literature and Humanities. She currently writes for VacTruth, Health Impact News, GreenMedInfo, The Liberty Beacon, Vaccine Impact and Medical Kidnap on immunisation safety and efficacy.

She has co-authored the book – Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis – Are Parents Being Falsely Accused? with Dr. Harold Buttram and Vaccination Policy and the UK Government: The Untold Truth with Lucija Tomljenovic PhD, which are sold on Amazon. She also compiled the book Shattered Dreams: The HPV Vaccine Exposed

Her website is Parents and Carers Against Medical Injustice

••••

Click on image below to visit site:

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)