Mark Steele on 5G, Nanotech Weapons in C19 Shots, Use of Heavy Metals as Weapons Systems

Mark Steele on 5G, Nanotech Weapons in C19 Shots, Use of Heavy Metals as Weapons Systems


ER Editor: We have lately been taking an interest in all those ‘truther’ doctors who resolutely refuse to deal with the problem of graphene oxide and other metals found by, according to Dr. Jane Ruby, around 150 researchers worldwide. One of those research teams finding graphene is La Quinta Columna from Spain, whose work we highly recommend.

There is certainly a cover-up of this aspect of the kill shots by Messrs. Malone, Cole, McCullough, etc. as they bang on about ‘mRNA’ and spike proteins. And focus on Big Pharma treatments, while they point fingers at ‘China’ instead of Fauci and crew. They carry many others in their wake, unfortunately.

Shutting down Dr. Astrid Stuckleberger recently at a Swedish conference organized by no less than Malone and Cole was all part of this. According to Jane Ruby, Cole ‘got his ass handed to him’ by Stuckleberger, whose main presentation took to task the dreadful agenda the WHO has had for us. Kudos.

Here we attempt to understand what ignoring this valid aspect of the toxic vaccines means.

Which means resurrecting some old territory.

While we can’t vouch for this, we have heard on the grapevine that 5G technology, at least as it was originally designed and planned, has largely been shut down because it is indeed a kill technology. Mark Steele notes that below. See his comments on South Korea and Wuhan. (So if the bad guys are still in charge, then who’s done this?) We notice that three years later, following the initial scare campaign about ‘Covid’ and the first lockdown in the spring of 2020, the promised 5G towers every 100 metres along our streets, with trees duly chopped down, haven’t materialized. Thankfully. Neither have the smart meters. In France, these were all being publicized three years ago.

Here’s what these so-called truther doctors are wilfully turning their backs on. Dr. Ryan Cole did that recently in a terrible interview with Del Bigtree. “There is no graphene oxide in vaccines” was his claim and best bud Bigtree just nodded.

Thanks to Dr. Ana Mihalcea for bringing this Mark Steele video to our attention, containing as it does some linkage between South Korea, Wuhan, northern Italy, 5G and vaccines loaded with metals.

***

See also this recent video —

Source

***

NOTES

This explanation links years of chemtrailing (geoengineering), which has been dousing our air, water and land with aluminium nanoparticulates with recent vaccines and 5G technology. In warfare, this type of metals contamination permits one side to see where its enemy is through radar. In a sense, it’s logical for this purpose. But not for regular life.

The difference between 4G and 5G is this: 4G is like a lightbulb with the lamp shade off. As you move further away from it, there is less power. 5G, however, is like a torch that scans the area around it. It’s a signal, a direct energy weapon, that can be beamed directly at someone. Pointed at someone’s head, it could cause a stroke. Such signals can cut through stainless steel. They are ionizing, despite what we’ve been told. So focused 5G energy can be used to activate metals inside the human body. The flu vaccines over the years have had metals contaminants in them. Tungsten is one of these. The mRNA vaccines are loaded up with them – aluminium, zinc, tungsten, etc. It means that with current technology, a person can be located but only as a type of ghost. If you’re loaded up with tungsten and aluminium, etc., however, you can be located clearly, with the beam directly aimed at you. It’s much more easily done when a person is loaded up with metal contaminants. There’s no pharmacological reason for these medical products being loaded up with these metals.

People loaded up with metals become a type of RFI – a dormant radio frequency emitter. So when radiation from external 5G sources hit you, this causes a person with metals in them to radiate those around them. Someone next to a vaccinated person can be seen to be unvaccinated. And they will be susceptible to the radiation that the vaxxed person is giving off. Both vaxxed and unvaxxed can get sick, but the unvaccinated can get sick from this vaccinated in this way. Cities are especially toxic for this because this is where 5G is mostly located.

The WEF didn’t plan for 6G because, by 2025, they expected a lot of dead people, whose wealth they could appropriate. (He talks about the utter toxicity of masks here.) So there has been a chemtrailing program to load people up with metals, in conjunction with vaccine technology. But the proviso is that people MUST TACITLY AGREE TO IT.

5G towers near homes are basically ways to spy on those homes and to record what products (which would all be electronically radiative with scannable tags on them) were used. People would be scanned 24/7. Local councils spend a lot in waste management, so they’ve been enticed by the idea that citizens will be fined for what they throw away. But this is a distraction because the equipment is basically planned for mass genocide. People who take away our trash, fix our electricity cables, etc. have no idea about this.

The vaccines can increase the effect of the radiation sprayed on you in your area. Initially, a lot of placebos were rolled out because they can’t kill everyone. (ER: This is a different explanation to why more people haven’t been killed by the shots than the one Ryan Cole gave publicly, to do with ‘degraded mRNA’.) But this is where the boosters come in. A new ‘variant’ can be created by the weapons system picking out an area with a lot of vaccinated people in it. These people can be identified through radar, and where they are (a building) can be pulsed with EMFs. Thus you get an ‘outbreak’ of sick and dead people. Which supports the ‘pathogen’ narrative. So it is the vaxxed that are set to be sick and hospitalized. The data backs this up.

In South Korea in 2019, the 5G system was turned on and five cities were set on fire. If you turn up the 5G system, the electrical grids go down and equipment burns. Injecting people with a vaccine works better because the system doesn’t have to be turned up so much. People who died in northern Italy in 2020 had been primed with the flu jab. Then 5G was turned on, making the vaccinated more toxically susceptible to the 5G frequencies. The kill grid with 5G can only work if people are injected.

Wuhan was a test: they vaccinated people in Wuhan in November 2019. Then they were put in the 5G grid. Steele has seen pictures of people projectile vomiting up blood as a result of this experiment. (So that may mean that the pictures we saw of people in Wuhan dying weren’t necessarily false.) But for that to happen, people had to be vaccinated so their vaccinated bodies could be destroyed with less frequency emission. Sorbitol has been added to these vaccinations, which opens up the blood/brain barrier. Hence nanoparticles such as those of Tungsten go directly into the brain.

(The last 5 minutes are more positive, about what people can do to fight back.)

********

Mark Steele on 5G, Nanotechnology Weapons in C19 Shots, Use of Heavy Metals as Weapons Systems – ABSOLUTELY MUST WATCH

Watch this important video here:

THE KILL GRID – MARK STEELE | TUNGSTEN IN VAX MAKES HUMANS ‘DORMANT RADIATION TRANSMITTERS’

I believe that corroborating information amongst many disciplines is important to gain deeper understanding of this war. In this excellent interview Mark Steele, weapons expert, explains how the metals and nanotechnology in the C19 shots are used as a weapon in conjunction with 5G.

He explains that the more metals a person has in them, they become radio traceable from space for directed energy weapons kill missions. He explains that he has intelligence documents that speak of the plan of killing 200 Million Americans by 2025. He advises to get out of the cities which are 5 G radiation hotspots. 5G is used to target areas to create “ viral outbreak centers”.

If you do not believe that, remember the retracted paper that 5G can create the Coronavirus in skin cells:

He explains how this weapons deployment was tested in South Korea in 2019. The vaccines are to be able to kill people with less 5 G radiation due to the metals that people have in them. He speaks about Tungsten, which is a particular metals used in weapons systems and mentions that the only reason to use Tungsten is to kill you.

He also discusses Aluminum and other metals that we know are in the shots as well as sprayed on us via geoengineering. People ask me a lot why I recommend so adamantly the EDTA Intravenous Chelation. That is because there is no other way that is more effective to get these metals out of the body fast. See below a metals test after one intravenous chelation with 1500mg EDTA. Look at what came out of that person who lives cleanly, eats only organic foods and lives in the country. How much radioactive Uranium and Cesium to contribute the the radiation. How much toxic Aluminum and Barium. Look at the Tungsten that Mark Steele mentions. This person is NOT vaccinated. My personal view is, if you want to be amongst the 1/3 of Americans who survive this war by 2025, find a Chelation practitioner. You can search for them online. Other forms of EDTA (Oral, transdermal, rectal) are not able to pull this massive amount of metals out fast enough because the dosing is too small. Everyone has this in them. It is the metals that will increase vulnerability to 5G radiation and be killed when 5 G is turned on. You can use other metal detox, but if you have metals in your organ system at this high level, how long will this take to pull out?

EDTA has been used to treat radiation poisoning and its neurotoxicity as well.

I agree with Mark Steele 100%. I highly recommend this video. Please share and help save a life. This is the real warfare we are facing and this weapon has a kill switch.

************

Source

Featured image, 5G: https://www.antistralingshop.nl/2022/01/30/5g-versus-4g-en-hoe-te-beschermen-tegen-5g-straling/

Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

Navy SEALs Take Court Battle to Biden Adm After C-19 JAB Mandate Overturned



Navy SEALs Take Court Battle to Biden Adm After Covid-19 JAB Mandate Overturned

BECKER NEWS

Navy SEALs in a court battle with the Biden administration over its alleged failure to consider their religious exemption requests to the COVID-19 vaccine mandate still suffer religious discrimination, according to a brief filed Friday.

The Department of Justice’s (DOJ) position is that now the Department of Defense (DOD) has complied with Congress’ order to rescind the mandate and servicemembers no longer face possible discharge for refusing the vaccine, courts should drop the case, Mike Berry, military affairs counsel at First Liberty Institute, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. However, the new policy leaves the door open to continued discrimination and treating unvaccinated members like “second-class citizens,” attorneys for the class action lawsuit that includes 26 Navy SEALs said in the brief.

“It’s important to keep in mind that since the very beginning, our position was never one way in which we challenged the authority to issue the mandate or or the existence of the mandate, or its or even its lawfulness,” Berry told the DCNF. “We only challenged the way that it was being discriminatorily enforced against service members of faith.”

The case centers around 26 Navy SEALs who filed a complaint in November 2021 alleging the Navy did not follow procedures for granting religious exemptions to the vaccine mandate, thereby violating the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, court documents show. The case was granted class action status in March and the entire Navy placed under an indefinite ban against discharging unvaccinated members.

The Navy published official guidance overturning the COVID-19 vaccine mandate on Jan. 11, following the Secretary of Defense’s order on Jan. 10, meaning members of the Navy are no longer required to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or subject to formal punishment for refusing the vaccine, and the court’s injunction no longer protects sailors.

“Voluntary cessation of challenged conduct, even by the government, does not deprive this Court of the power to determine its legality,” the brief states, referring to alleged violations of servicemembers’ first amendment rights.

In addition, the DOD memo and subsequent Navy guidance, NAVADMIN 005/23, offer commanders wide berth to make deployment decisions based on vaccination status, citing the need to minimize health risks to troops.

“To defend the nation, we need a healthy and ready force, this means a Navy and Marine Corps that is ready to deploy,” Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro said in a memo titled ALNAV 009/23.

“We will continue to consider medical readiness, of which vaccination plays a key role, in all appropriate settings. All commanders have the responsibility and authority to maintain military readiness, unit cohesion, good order and discipline, and the health and safety of their commands,” Del Toro continued.

However, NAVADMIN 005/23 stipulates that no additional religious accommodations will be granted.

Neither do they nullify other department-level rules regarding treatment of unvaccinated servicemembers, resulting in de facto opportunities for discrimination against servicemembers, the attorneys explain in Friday’s brief.

For example, Naval officer Lt. Levi Beaird filed for a religious accommodation to the vaccine that he never received, and the Navy is blocking him from deploying and completing other activities due to his unvaccinated status, Berry told the DCNF. If he doesn’t achieve certain career milestones, the Navy will require he repay a $75,000 retention bonus.

“It’s just a backdoor way for them to continue to harass, intimidate and punish servicemembers because of their faith,” Berry said.

Some of his Navy SEAL clients say their superiors are mulling the possibility of “rerating” the SEALs, or removing their Naval Special Warfare designation and placing them alongside “regular” sailors, he explained.

“Most of these guys, they joined the Navy to be Navy SEALs, and they didn’t become Navy SEALs by accident,” said Berry. Not only would the change in status rob the members of pride in serving in special operations, but it would also cut them off from financial bonuses.

The Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans will hold oral arguments for the case on Feb. 6, First Liberty said in a press release on Monday.

“This religious discrimination must stop,” Berry said, according to the release.

DOD referred the DCNF to the DOJ. DOJ and the Navy did not immediately respond to the DCNF’s requests for comment.

Post written by Micaela Burrow. Republished with permission from DCNF. Images via Becker News.

*********

(TLB) published this article from Becker News as Compiled by Kyle Becker

Header featured image (edited) credit: US Navy patch/Becker News post

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

Evidence suggesting an iatrogenic death spike in England in the spring of 2020 is mounting up

Evidence suggesting an iatrogenic death spike in England in the spring of 2020 is mounting up


ER Editor: Back in March 2020, when a lot of countries went into their first lockdown, there was a spike in deaths around that time (April). It was easy to attribute it to ‘Covid’, as every death became labelled a Covid death as a matter of policy. Deaths due to ‘Covid’ certainly fitted the fear narrative. But likely, it wasn’t Covid killing people largely speaking (if at all), so what were these deaths due to?

And what about other observable waves of death, such as early 2021?

***

Just to be very clear, an ‘iatrogenic death’ is one that is due to the TREATMENT (or lack thereof) given to the patient, either wilfully or through error or negligence. It’s not the original disease that caused the death, in other words. For example, the article below mentions that instead of giving antibiotics to patients for their respiratory infections, antivirals – prescribed as a matter of Covid policy – could account for deaths due to respiratory bacteria that would otherwise have caused no problem had the patient been given the correct treatment in the first place. Medical error, medical neglect and/or medical policy caused this.

Where does the over-prescription of Midazolam to the elderly fit into this picture, we wonder. Another policy prevalent at the time.

***

The following article deals exclusively with diagnoses of cancer, heart problems, respiratory problems and mental health disorders, and how many diagnoses of these conditions were made around the time of the spike in deaths in the spring of 2020.

********

Evidence suggesting an iatrogenic death spike in England in the spring of 2020 is mounting up


The evidence is mounting up. ONS data shows that in England during the spring of 2020, there was a death spike. The causes of the deaths were recorded across several disease groups suggesting they are iatrogenic deaths – deaths induced by medical professionals or by medical treatment or diagnostic procedures.

John Dee has been publishing a series of articles on causes of excess deaths using data Joel Smalley obtained from the Office of National Statistics (“ONS”) using the Freedom of Information ActData Smalley obtained details weekly deaths by date of death, age, sex and primary cause of death covering the period June 2014 to November 2022.

John Dee is a former head of clinical audit at a busy NHS teaching hospital specialising in clinical outcomes. Previously, Dee headed a statistical modelling section as a G7 government scientist, providing consultancy for both the public and private sectors.

Before beginning his current series, Dee had prepared the data by deriving mortality rates by cause. He has derived excess death in accordance with standard ONS procedures and grouped the cause of death according to the International Classification of Diseases, release 10  (“ICD-10”) codes.  “Each and every clinical diagnosis under the sun within ICD-10 (there were 95,352 last time I looked) is grouped into something called a ‘chapter’,”  he explained.

The initial four-part series is titled ‘Trends in Causality for England, 2014/w23 – 2022/w46’.  You can read the articles HEREHEREHERE and HERE.

In his latest series, ‘Excess Deaths by Cause, England 2020/w1 – 2022/w46’, Dee starts with the most common cause of death (see image above) and works his way through the list.  So far, he has managed to complete four parts.  You can read the articles in the series by following the links below:

  1. Part 1: Neoplasms  HERE
  2. Part 2: Diseases of the circulatory system HERE
  3. Part 3: Diseases of the respiratory system HERE
  4. Part 4: Mental and behavioural disorders HERE

For the sake of brevity, below we have merely extracted the final slide and Dee’s concluding remarks from each article.

Part 1

We start with the most common cause of death: neoplasms. A neoplasm is an abnormal growth of cells in the body. It can be a small, benign (non-cancerous) growth such as a mole. Or it can also be a malignant (cancerous) or precancerous tumour.

The summary slide clearly reveals the 2020/w15 death spike for synchronous neoplasms occurring in 50 – 59y, 60 – 69y, 70 -79y, 80 – 89y and +90y groups. Anybody thinking this can be passed off as a coincidence needs hitting over the head with a wet haddock. Either these are covid deaths (or some other transient pathogen) that were surreptitiously switched to neoplasms during automated cause processing at ONS’ end of things or we’re looking at iatrogenic death.

Part 2

We now come the second most frequent cause of death, this being diseases of the circulatory system. This ICD-10 chapter covers everything from I010 Acute rheumatic pericarditis to I99X Other and unspecified disorders of circulatory system. In plain English we’re talking heart attacks, heart failure, heart flutter and heart valve conditions as well as sudden cardiac death, aortic rupture and bacterial infection.

We’ve got some interesting spikes whose dates are worth checking against various happenings on the covid management front, we’ve got a triple-humper and we’ve got the tell-tale tail-off of delayed processing.

ER: This may be where dates of vaccine rollout / boosters, etc. become relevant …

Part 3

We now come the third most frequent cause of death, this being diseases of the respiratory system. This ICD-10 chapter covers everything from J00X Acute nasopharyngitis [common cold] to J99.8 Respiratory disorders in other diseases classified elsewhere. In plain English we’re talking asthma, COPD, emphysema, influenza, pneumonia, laryngitis, tonsillitis, bronchitis and, of course, my favourite coding: J67.2 Bird fancier’s lung. These respiratory deaths are strictly non-covid; covid-related deaths were counted under ICD-10 Chapter XXII: Codes for special purposes.

Below is the final catch-all slide, which will be dominated by the dynamics for the older age groups. The overall series grand mean is -276.7 deaths per week. That’s a lot of missing deaths that has been sustained for nigh on three years, so I am beginning to suspect the usual ONS coding fun and games, especially given the software was tweaked during January 2020 in time for the pandemic party.

From COVID To CONVID

OK then, so those two dirty great holes in excess death coinciding with the traditional seasonal peak for all things respiratory has generated a decent wedge of critical commentary, and rightly so. Sure, we can wave our hands and talk about viral dominance, but it isn’t influenza that does all the killing per se, it is pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia at that.

There’s also a rumour going round that UK medics stopped prescribing antibiotics for respiratory cases back in 2020 and the winter of 2020/21 because they switched to new-fangled antivirals as per guidance. I’m aware that some UK hospitals got involved in the RECOVERY and REMAP experimental drug trials, but it would be darn handy if some courageous bod could come forward to confirm or deny these rumours. If true, then we’re talking iatrogenic death.

All this prompted to cancel my appointment with the beautician and lump all chapter XXII (Codes for special purposes) deaths in with respiratory to see what that final slide for all ages looks like with a make-over. Have a look for yourself:

There’s our familiar 2020/w15 (w/e 10 April) multi-synchronous across the chapters and age groups mega death spike (that also happens to coincide with those two trials I mentioned), and there is the winter of antibiotic discontent spike. After that we have plain sailing and a picture that makes sense for the 2022/23 season.

It sure looks to me like a whole heap of genuine respiratory death has been re-branded as covid, and this is a situation where a certifying physician’s idea of causality would have been over-ridden by the MUSE software coding rules. I would suggest that a thorough audit of the paper trail is in order.

As for those twin peaks, we can no longer trust that these have arisen solely from covid alone given the mounting evidence of poor patient management. I would not be at all surprised if we were looking at an iatrogenic mountain of horrendous proportion, within which genuine covid death has been buried.

Part 4

We now come to the fourth most frequent cause of death, this being the chapter that covers mental and behavioural disorders. This ICD-10 chapter covers everything from F00.0 Dementia in Alzheimer’s disease with early onset to F99.X Mental disorder, not otherwise specified. In plain English we’re talking about conditions like delirium, dementia, drug addiction, alcoholism, solvent abuse, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, phobia, anorexia, autism and Asperger’s.

The enormous spike in the slide below is due to the spikes seen in 60+ year old age groups.  We’re once again looking at the iatrogenic death spike of 2020/w15 (w/e 10 April).  We’re not looking at any kind of accident. We’re not looking at error. We’re looking at inexplicable and sudden death of elderly folk with mental health issues during the spring of 2020, and this in conjunction with the inexplicable and sudden death of those with cancer, cardiac and respiratory conditions all in the same couple of weeks.

Featured image: The Number One Way People Die = Iatrogenic Death = Death By Doctor / Conventional Health Care (video), Iatrogenic Illness: Caused By Physician, Surgeon, Treatment or Diagnostic Procedure (original video)

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Visit Original Source

Inside The Secret Government Meeting On COVID-19 & Natural Immunity



Inside The Secret Government Meeting On COVID-19 & Natural Immunity

Post by Tyler Durden | Written by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times

Four of the highest ranking U.S. health officials—including Dr. Anthony Fauci—met in secret to discuss whether or not naturally immune people should be exempt from getting COVID-19 vaccines, The Epoch Times can reveal.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci during a Senate hearing in Washington on May 17, 2022. (Shawn Thew/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

The officials brought in four outside experts to discuss whether the protection gained after recovering from COVID-19—known as natural immunity—should count as one or more vaccine doses.

“There was interest in several people in the administration in hearing basically the opinions of four immunologists in terms of what we thought about … natural infection as contributing to protection against moderate to severe disease, and to what extent that should influence dosing,” Dr. Paul Offit, one of the experts, told The Epoch Times.

Offit and another expert took the position that the naturally immune need fewer doses. The other two experts argued natural immunity shouldn’t count as anything.

The discussion did not lead to a change in U.S. vaccination policy, which has never acknowledged post-infection protection. Fauci and the other U.S. officials who heard from the experts have repeatedly downplayed that protection, claiming that it is inferior to vaccine-bestowed immunity. Most studies on the subject indicate the opposite.

The meeting, held in October 2021, was briefly discussed before on a podcast. The Epoch Times has independently confirmed the meeting took place, identified all of the participants, and uncovered other key details.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of medicine at Stanford University who did not participate in the meeting, criticized how such a consequential discussion took place behind closed doors with only a few people present.

“It was a really impactful decision that they made in private with a very small number of people involved. And they reached the wrong decision,” Bhattacharya told The Epoch Times.

An email obtained by The Epoch Times shows Dr. Vivek Murthy contacting colleagues to arrange the meeting. (The Epoch Times)

The Participants

From the government:

  • Fauci, the head of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden until the end of 2022
  • Dr. Vivek Murthy, the U.S. surgeon general
  • Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the head of U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
  • Dr. Francis Collins, head of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, which includes the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, until December 2021
  • Dr. Bechara Choucair, the White House vaccine coordinator until November 2021

From outside the government:

  • Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and an adviser to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on vaccines
  • Dr. Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota and a former member of Biden’s COVID-19 advisory board
  • Akiko Iwasaki, professor of immunobiology and molecular, cellular, and developmental biology at Yale University
  • Dr. Peter Hotez, co-director of Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development and dean of the Baylor College of Medicine’s School of Tropical Medicine

Fauci and Murthy decided to hold the meeting, according to emails The Epoch Times obtained.

“Would you be available tonight from 9-9:30 for a call with a few other scientific colleagues on infection-induced immunity? Tony and I just discussed and were hoping to do this sooner rather than later if possible,” Murthy wrote in one missive to Fauci, Walensky, and Collins.

All three quickly said they could make it.

Walensky asked who would be there.

Murthy listed the participants. “I think you know all of them right?” he said.

Walensky said she knew all but one person. “Sounds like a good crew,” she added.

From top left, clockwise: Dr. Vivek Murthy, Dr. Francis Collins, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Dr. Rochelle Walensky. (Getty Images)

‘Clear Benefit’

During the meeting, Offit put forth his position—that natural immunity should count as two doses.

At the time, the CDC recommended three shots—a two-dose primary series and a booster—for many Americans 18 and older, soon expanding that advice to all adults, even though trials of the boosters only analyzed immunogenicity and efficacy among those without evidence of prior infection.

Research indicated that natural immunity was long-lasting and superior to vaccination. On the other hand, the CDC published a paper in its quasi-journal that concluded vaccination was better.

Osterholm sided with Offit, but thought that having recovered from COVID-19 should only count as a single dose.

“I added my voice at the meeting to count an infection as equivalent to a dose of vaccine! I’ve always believed hybrid immunity likely provides the most protection,” Osterholm told The Epoch Times via email.

Hybrid immunity refers to getting a vaccine after recovering from COVID-19.

Some papers have found vaccination after recovery boosts antibodies, which are believed to be a correlate of protection. Other research has shown that the naturally immune have a higher risk of side effects than those who haven’t recovered from infection. Some experts believe the risk is worth the benefit but others do not.

Hotez and Iwasaki, meanwhile, made the case that natural immunity should not count as any dose—as has been the case in virtually the entire United States since the COVID-19 vaccines were first rolled out.

Iwasaki referred to a British preprint study, soon after published in Nature, that concluded, based on survey data, that the protection from the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines was heightened among people with evidence of prior infection. She also noted a study she worked on that found the naturally immune had higher antibody titers than the vaccinated, but that the vaccinated “reached comparable levels of neutralization responses to the ancestral strain after the second vaccine dose.” The researchers also discovered T cells—thought to protect against severe illness—were boosted by vaccination.

There’s a “clear benefit” to boosting regardless of prior infection, Iwasaki, who has since received more than $2 million in grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), told participants after the meeting in an email obtained by The Epoch Times. Hotez received $789,000 in grants from the NIH in fiscal year 2020, and has received other grants totaling millions in previous years. Offit, who co-invented the rotavirus vaccine, received $3.5 million in NIH grants from 1985 through 2004.

Hotez declined interview requests through a spokesperson. Iwasaki did not respond to requests for comment.

No participants represented experts like Bhattacharya who say that the naturally immune generally don’t need any doses at all.

In an email obtained by The Epoch Times, Akiko Iwasaki wrote to other meeting participants shortly after the meeting ended. (The Epoch Times)

Public Statements

In public, Hotez repeatedly portrayed natural immunity as worse than vaccination, including citing the widely criticized CDC paper, which drew from just two months of testing in a single state.

In one post on Twitter on Oct. 29, 2021, he referred to another CDC study, which concluded that the naturally immune were five times as likely to test positive compared to vaccinated people with no prior infection, and stated: “Still more evidence, this time from @CDCMMWR showing that vaccine-induced immunity is way better than infection and recovery, what some call weirdly ‘natural immunity’. The antivaccine and far right groups go ballistic, but it’s the reality.”

That same day, the CDC issued a “science brief” that detailed the agency’s position on natural immunity versus the protection from vaccines. The brief, which has never been updated, says that available evidence shows both the vaccinated and naturally immune “have a low risk of subsequent infection for at least 6 months” but that “the body of evidence for infection-induced immunity is more limited than that for vaccine-induced immunity.”

Evidence shows that vaccination after infection, or hybrid immunity, “significantly enhances protection and further reduces risk of reinfection” and is the foundation of the CDC’s recommendations, the agency said.

Several months later, the CDC acknowledged that natural immunity was superior to vaccination against the Delta variant, which was displaced in late 2021 by Omicron. The CDC, which has made misleading representations before on the evidence supporting vaccination of the naturally immune, did not respond to a request for comment regarding whether the agency will ever update the brief.

Iwasaki had initially been open to curbing the number of doses for the naturally immune—”I think this supports the idea of just giving one dose to people who had covid19,” she said in response to one Twitter post in early 2021, which is restricted from view—but later came to argue that each person who is infected has a different immune response, and that the natural immunity, even if strong initially, wanes over time.

Osterholm has knocked people who claim natural immunity is weak or non-existent, but has also claimed that vaccine-bestowed immunity is better. Osterholm also changed the stance he took in the meeting just several months later, saying in February 2022 that “we’ve got to make three doses the actual standard” while also “trying to understand what kind of immunity we get from a previous infection.”

Offit has been the leading critic on the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, which advises U.S. regulators on vaccines, over their authorizations of COVID-19 boosters. Offit has said boosters are unnecessary for the young and healthy because they don’t add much to the primary series. He also criticized regulators for authorizing updated shots without consulting the committee and absent clinical data. Two of the top U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials resigned over the booster push. No FDA officials were listed on invitations to the secret meeting on natural immunity.

Fauci and Walensky Downplay Natural Immunity

Fauci and Walensky, two of the most visible U.S. health officials during the pandemic, have repeatedly downplayed natural immunity.

Fauci, who said in an email in March 2020 that he assumed there would be “substantial immunity post infection,” would say later that natural immunity was real but that the durability was uncertain. He noted the studies finding higher antibody levels from hybrid immunity.

In September 2021, months after claiming that vaccinated people “can feel safe that they are not going to get infected,” Fauci said that he did not have “a really firm answer” on whether the naturally immune should get vaccinated.

“It is conceivable that you got infected, you’re protected—but you may not be protected for an indefinite period of time,” Fauci said on CNN when pressed on the issue. “So I think that is something that we need to sit down and discuss seriously.”

After the meeting, Fauci would say that natural immunity and vaccine-bestowed immunity both wane, and that people should get vaccinated regardless of prior infection to boost their protection.

Walensky, before she became CDC director, signed a document called the John Snow Memorandum in response to the Great Barrington Declaration, which Bhattacharya coauthored. The declaration called for focused protection of the elderly and otherwise infirm, stating, “The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk.”

The memorandum, in contrast, said there was “no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection” and supported the harsh lockdown measures that had been imposed in the United States and elsewhere.

In March 2021, after becoming director, Walensky released recommendations that the naturally immune get vaccinated, noting that there was “substantial durability” of protection six months after infection but that “rare cases of reinfection” had been reported.

Walensky hyped the CDC study on natural immunity in August 2021, and the second study in October 2021. But when the third paper came out concluding natural immunity was superior, she did not issue a statement. Walensky later told a blog that the study found natural immunity provided strong protection, “perhaps even more so than those who had been vaccinated and not yet boosted.”

But, because it came before Omicron, she said, “it’s not entirely clear how that protection works in the context of Omicron and boosting.”

Walensky, Murthy, and Collins did not respond to requests for interviews. Fauci, who stepped down from his positions in late 2022, could not be reached.

Murthy and Collins also portrayed natural immunity as inferior. “From the studies about natural immunity, we are seeing more and more data that tells us that while you get some protection from natural infection, it’s not nearly as strong as what you get from the vaccine,” Murthy said on CNN about two months before the meeting. Collins, in a series of blog posts, highlighted the studies showing higher antibody levels after vaccination and urged people to get vaccinated. He also voiced support for vaccine mandates.

Read more here…

**********

(TLB) published this article as posted by Tyler Durden and written by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times

Header featured image (edited) credit: From top left, clockwise: Dr. Vivek Murthy, Dr. Francis Collins, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Dr. Rochelle Walensky. (Getty Images)

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

San Diego Declares Housing A ‘Human Right’ Without A Plan To End Homelessness

San Diego Declares Housing A ‘Human Right’ Without A Plan To End Homelessness

By unanimous resolution last week, the city of San Diego declared that “housing is a human right.” But no one knows exactly what that means.

The city went on to reaffirm “its commitment to providing more housing services geared toward putting a roof over the head of every San Diegan.”

Quick to downplay the legal implications, city attorney Dan Eaton said of the resolution, “it’s pretty clear it doesn’t have any legal effect.” So, what does the declaration mean?

The city council rightly values housing as “a component of a standard of living adequate for health and well-being.” The resolution affirms that “housing provides stability and security” and that individuals “should have a secure, peaceful, and dignified place to live.” Nearly everyone agrees on the central importance of housing for human dignity. But if declaring housing to be a human right means that the government is obligated to provide housing with no strings attached, won’t that result in human disempowerment rather than security, peace, or dignity?

Protecting something of value, regardless of “human right” status, differs greatly from providing that object of value. When the government protects human rights such as life, speech, and marriage, it prevents those rights from being wrongfully stripped from us. It does not provide them for us. For example, the government is not responsible for keeping us alive, platforming our speech, or offering us suitable spouses. This is a good thing. Maybe the real question, then, is not whether housing is a human right but whether the government is responsible for providing things, like housing, that are central to dignity and quality of life.

Many things add dignity and quality to human lives — safe homes, fulfilling jobs, healthy relationships, and nourished bodies. The government allows human lives to flourish when it acts to protect the pursuits of these things, not when it becomes the provider of them. With over half of the unsheltered-homeless population citing mental illness or substance abuse as a cause for their loss of housing, the narrative that more affordable housing will solve the problem is tired and untrue.

Commendably, at the end of their resolution, the council members acknowledge that ensuring their neighbors are housed requires “policies that address the root causes of homelessness.” Yet nowhere in the resolution do they name the root causes of homelessness nor provide a plan to address them. Governments that use excessive amounts of taxpayer money to create free housing with no requirements for treatment or training fail to address the root causes of homelessness. Worse, free housing with no responsibility isolates suffering individuals and deprives them of ownership and accountability.

The people of San Diego, whether housed or unhoused, gain nothing from the city council’s resolution that “housing is a human right.” At best, it is an empty promise of an unclarified ideal: housing for those who have none. At worst, it obligates the government to spend millions on rooms that leave those suffering from addiction, mental illness, and the traumas of homelessness isolated and alone to continue suffering.

Source

The Miracle of the Ineffective Vaccines

The Miracle of the Ineffective Vaccines


The Miracle of the Ineffective Vaccines

Where would we all be now?

Before I start, this isn’t about people dying who may not have died with an effective vaccine. It’s not about that. In an ideal world, for people vulnerable to Covid, there would be a safe and effective vaccine, available to anyone who wanted it and no pressure on those who didn’t. But we don’t live in an ideal world.

I call it ‘the miracle of the ineffective vaccines’ because think what a different world we would be living in right now if the vaccines WERE effective. Imagine what your life would be like if the Covid vaccines DID stop infections and DID stop transmission. There’s no doubt about it, we would be living in some dystopian nightmare.

Fortunately, many of us could see that the vaccines didn’t stop infections or transmission in 2021. The authorities knew it, too. It was clear as day in the UKHSA data which showed that the rate of infections per 100,000 individuals was much higher in the vaccinated. The worse those stats became, the more they tried to hide it until they were removed for good.

Even with that information and the appearance of Omicron, segregating the unvaccinated was top of the agenda. The infrastructure had been created and the power-hungry who were taking advantage of the situation, were keen to use it. Restrictions, mandates and passports were all part of the new tools the authoritarians had at their disposal.

Even in 2022, 50 countries had mandates in place and over 100 countries had restrictions to access public services, facilities or schools. This map (from the University of Oxford) shows the countries (in blue) around the world that had some kind of restrictions on the unvaccinated in place.

Map of the world showing countries with differentiated coding in place

Examples of mandates or restrictions included:

  • Italy (and France) mandated healthcare workers to be vaccinated (France still hasn’t reinstated them)
  • Israel introduced a Green Pass only allowing the vaccinated to do various things;
  • Austria had lockdowns only for the unvaccinated;
  • France required vaccine passes to access shops, theatres and transport;
  • Germany had different access rights to cultural and leisure facilities, transport and long-term care facilities;
  • Uganda used armed police to forcibly vaccinate bus travellers;
  • Tajikistan mandated vaccination for the entire adult population;
  • Turkmenistan required all of its adult population to be vaccinated;
  • Ecuador mandated vaccination for everyone over 5;
  • Puerto Rico required over 5s to be vaccinated to attend school;
  • Cost Rica mandated children between 3-18 to be vaccinated;
  • America had various mandates, for example municipal workers in New York had to be vaccinated, many health care workers had to be vaccinated or lose their jobs and the military all had to be vaccinated;
  • The UK sacked almost 40,000 care home staff and were close to mandating vaccination for all health care workers.
  • Canada mandated vaccination for all federal employees;
  • Australia only allowed vaccinated individuals to access facilities after they reopened post lockdowns.

The list goes on and on.

All around the world, travel was exclusively for the vaccinated. Some countries allowed you to enter if you were unvaccinated but required that you quarantined. Others just flat-out refused entry to the unvaccinated. Even today, if I want to visit the ‘Land of the Free’ and see the Statue of Liberty, I can’t because of my vaccination status.

And it got even worse than that. People were denied hospital treatment and there was increasing hostility towards the unvaccinated. There were calls for further segregation and the media whipped the vaccinated into a frenzy. ‘Deny them access to hospitals’, ‘Leave them to die at home’, ‘Send people round to their homes to pin them down and vaccinate them’ and ‘Don’t let their kids attend school unless they’re vaccinated’. These are just some of the daily remarks you could hear on TV or read in newspapers.

I’ve always wondered how the Germans, as a highly civilised society, could have produced Nazis. I wrongly concluded that it was something to do with their culture and the same couldn’t happen in the UK or the US. Oh how I was wrong. It was a great example of how normal people could turn on their fellow citizens and call for unimaginable discrimination. Possibly worse than that were the people that didn’t have strong opinions on these things but said or did nothing.

In the UK and probably more so in the US, a large proportion of black people weren’t vaccinated. So in places like New York, segregation returned and nobody batted an eyelid. Racism was suddenly allowed again, authorised by the vaccine.

A shocking couple of years. Things happened which many will want to forget about. They will deny they happened or twist the facts in their heads. At the very best, they will tell themselves it was all necessary at the time, they were saving lives.

That is why the ineffectiveness of the vaccines can be seen as a miracle. Without that miracle we would be in a terrible place today.

However, the battle may be won (for most) but the war is most definitely not over. The powers that be are still fighting to bring vaccine passports or digital IDs into place. They have invested heavily in the infrastructure and it is all ready to go. New ICD codes are in place to distinguish between the vaccinated and unvaccinated, including the reasons for not being vaccinated.

At some point in the future, a new panic will occur, the media will scare the population again and discriminative and controlling digital vaccine passes will try to make a come back. Let’s make sure that they don’t.

Write in the comments below what restrictions, mandates and passes you had/have in your country so that there is a record of all the absurdities that occurred.

**************

Source

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Visit Original Source

Why Egg Farms are Really Being Destroyed

Why Egg Farms are Really Being Destroyed


ER Editor: This 21st Century Wire article details not only a recent fire destroying the US’ third largest egg farm, but lists other farms suffering a similar fate since 2020:

Third-Largest Egg Farm in US Mysteriously Catches Fire, 100,000 Chickens Killed

Readers may also be interested in this disturbing short video on plastic materials being found in US eggs:

Source

Readers may be interested in Michael Jaco‘s recent discussion of the topic and how the food supply is being destroyed. See HERE After years serving the American military abroad, he sagely observes that ‘the worst people in the world are here in America’.

********

So THAT’S why eggs are so deviled these days!

Next thing you know, eggs farms will be on fire. Oh, wait…

So this came to the attention of the inner worlds today. It is not new, but it is fresh! Just like those eggs those gorgeous chickens lay that we fry, poach and scramble. The article is entitled: “Chicken Egg Yolk Antibodies (IgYs) block the binding of multiple SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variants to human ACE2” and it was published by a Chinese group in January 2021.

The ULTIMATE Guide to Deviled Eggs {50+ recipes} | The View from Great Island
https://theviewfromgreatisland.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-deviled-eggs/
.

These IgY antibodies are amazing little guys! They don’t activate complement, they don’t activate rheumatoid factors in humans and so don’t aggravate the inflammatory responses! What do they do? They neutralize many pathogens including RSV (remember this when they push that new MRNA shot on you against RSV), including SARS-CoV-2 which has been shown both in vitro and in vivo.

IgY antibodies are found in birds, reptiles and lungfish, but especially in chicken egg yolks! How cool is that, eh? It’s basically the functional equivalent to human IgG.

Right to the bottom line we go!

Conclusions

In summary, the anti-Spike-S1 IgYs showed significant neutralizing potency against SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus, various S mutants, and even SARS-CoV in vitro.

And no conflicts of interest. I read the methods and they are as sound as any methodology. They checked multiple viruses, variations of the S protein competitive inhibition of ACE-2 binding and found that IgY competed real well for binding sites showing significant neutralizing (SARS pseudoviruses, anyway) ability.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567576920336390?via%3Dihub#b0035

So this is definitely an interesting line of investigation and I am glad that this and other groups are pursuing these studies.

Read about recent destruction of egg supplies here and here.

That’s all for now. We have an emergency on the roof. Damned storm wrecked our water boiler set up.

************

Source

Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

National Archives claims it wasn’t allowed to announce Biden Classified Doc Discovery



National Archives claims it wasn’t allowed to announce Biden Classified Doc Discovery

Only two people who could have given him those orders, and that is either the Department of Justice with Merrick Garland or the White House with Joe Biden. ~Rep. James Comer

By Ben Whedon

House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., said the National Archives had claimed it was not permitted to publicly discuss the discovery of classified materials at various locations once occupied by President Joe Biden, prompting the lawmaker to suggest that the administration had intervened.

Comer met with National Archives general counsel Gary Stern on Tuesday. Prior to the meeting, Comer says he was handed a letter from the Department of Justice indicating that Stern was barred from commenting on the matter.

Getty Images

“Right before the National Archives came in, they handed us a letter from the Department of Justice informing them and us that the general counsel for the National Archives wasn’t allowed to say anything about the Biden documents. But we went ahead and we had about a three-plus hour transcribed interview with the general counsel, and what we learned was that there is a double standard here with how Donald Trump was treated versus Joe Biden,” Comer said in an appearance on Fox News.

“[T]he general counsel said that he did do press releases, but he was ordered and told they couldn’t be published,” Comer said. “[T]here are only two people who could have given him those orders, and that is either the Department of Justice with Merrick Garland or the White House with Joe Biden.”

The Archives have previously publicly commented on matters pertaining to the investigation of former President Donald Trump over his alleged mishandling of classified documents, a disparity Comer noted.

“[W]hat we learned was that there is a double standard here with how Donald Trump was treated versus Joe Biden,” he concluded.

*********

(TLB) published  this article  with permission of John Solomon at Just the News.  Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News

Header featured image (edited) credit: National Archives/orginal JtN article

Emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)