Growing Number Of Doctors Say They Won’t Get C-19 Booster Shots

Growing Number Of Doctors Say They Won’t Get C-19 Booster Shots


Growing Number Of Doctors Say They Won’t Get COVID-19 Booster Shots

Post by Tyler Durden | Written by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times

A growing number of doctors say that they will not get COVID-19 vaccine boosters, citing a lack of clinical trial evidence.

I have taken my last COVID vaccine without RCT level evidence it will reduce my risk of severe disease,” Dr. Todd Lee, an infectious disease expert at McGill University, wrote on Twitter.

Lee was pointing to the lack of randomized clinical trial (RCT) results for the updated boosters, which were cleared in the United States and Canada in the fall of 2022 primarily based on data from experiments with mice.

Lee, who has received three vaccine doses, noted that he was infected with the Omicron virus variant—the vaccines provide little protection against infection—and described himself as a healthy male in his 40s.

A vial of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is seen in a file photograph. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Dr. Vinay Prasad, a professor of epidemiology and biostatics at the University of California, San Francisco, also said he wouldn’t take any additional shots until clinical trial data become available.

“I took at least 1 dose against my will. It was unethical and scientifically bankrupt,” he said.

Allison Krug, an epidemiologist who co-authored a study that found teenage boys were more likely to suffer heart inflammation after COVID-19 vaccination than COVID-19 infection, recounted explaining to her doctor why she was refusing a booster and said her doctor agreed with her position.

She called on people to “join the movement to demand appropriate evidence,” pointing to a blog post from Prasad.

“Pay close attention to note this isn’t anti-vaccine sentiment. This is ‘provide [hard] evidence of benefit to justify ongoing use’ which is very different. It is only fair for a 30 billion dollar a year product given to hundreds of millions,” Lee said.

Dr. Mark Silverberg, who founded the Toronto Immune and Digestive Health Institute; Kevin Bass, a medical student; and Dr. Tracy Høeg, an epidemiologist at the University of California, San Francisco, joined Lee and Prasad in stating their opposition to more boosters, at least for now.

Høeg said she did not need clinical trials to know she’s not getting any boosters after receiving a two-dose primary series, adding that she took the second dose “against my will.”

I also had an adverse reaction to dose 1 moderna and, if I could do it again, I would not have had any covid vaccines,” she said on Twitter. “I was glad my parents in their 70s could get covid vaccinated but have yet to see non-confounded data to advise them about the bivalent booster. I would have liked to see an RCT for the bivalent for people their age and for adults with health conditions that put them at risk.”

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted emergency use authorization to updated boosters, or bivalent shots, from Pfizer and Moderna in August 2022 despite there being no human data.

Observational data suggests the boosters provide little protection against infection and solid shielding against severe illness, at least initially.

Five months after the authorization was granted, no clinical trial data has been made available for the bivalents, which target the Wuhan strain as well as the BA.4 and BA.5 subvariants of Omicron. Moderna presented efficacy estimates for a different bivalent, which has never been used in the United States, during a recent meeting. The company estimated the booster increased protection against infection by just 10 percent.

The FDA is preparing to order all Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines be replaced with the bivalents. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which issues recommendations on vaccines, continues advising virtually all Americans to get a primary series and multiple boosters.

Professor Calls for Halt to Messenger RNA Vaccines

A professor, meanwhile, became the latest to call for a halt to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which are both based on messenger RNA technology.

At this point in time, all COVID mRNA vaccination program[s] should stop immediately,” Retsef Levi, a professor of operations management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said in a video statement. “They should stop because they completely failed to fulfill any of their advertised promise[s] regarding efficacy. And more importantly, they should stop because of the mounting and indisputable evidence that they cause unprecedented level of harm, including the death of young people and children.”

Levi was referring to post-vaccination heart inflammation, or myocarditis. The condition is one of the few that authorities have acknowledged is caused by the messenger RNA vaccines.

Read more here…

*********

(TLB) published this article as posted by Tyler Durden and written by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times

Header featured image (edited) credit:  Vial/MGN image

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

WELCOME TO THE NWO GULAG — James Perloff

SGT Report – Feb 2nd, 2023


Get 24 filling grams of clean, pasture-raised, premium protein per serving in a creamy ice-cream shake flavor: http://lowcarbwithsgt.com/
Get It Today for 51% OFF ^^ CLICK NOW^^

James Perloff returns to SGT Report to expose the United Nations Agenda 2030 New World Order World Economic Forum plan for 15-minute gulags where human freedom will go to die.
https://jamesperloff.net/


SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

Alex Jones Returns! Wednesday Live Must Watch: Russia Warns of Looming Armageddon As Ukraine Demands Nuclear Weapons

The Alex Jones Show – Feb 2, 2023


Alex Jones breaks down how the globalists are doing everything they can to spark World War III to distract the public from their COVID crimes against humanity — tune in and share this link!

Russia is warning that World War III may be just around the corner as Ukraine belligerently demands nuclear weapons from NATO states.

The war for your mind has been exposed! But the blueprint to defeat the NWO is here! Order Alex Jones’ new book about The Great Reset before it’s too late! https://www.amazon.com/Great-Reset-War-World/dp/1510774041

Click Here For Nitric Boost


SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

It’s Time For The Scientific Community To Admit They Were Wrong About C-19

It’s Time For The Scientific Community To Admit They Were Wrong About C-19


It’s Time For The Scientific Community To Admit They Were Wrong About COVID

It Cost Lives

mobile-logo

Real “mea culpa”, ongoing and rapid revision of history, or further narrative management with regard ‘amnesty’ over what “the others” did to those who thought for themselves over the last few years…

You decide…

In no less a liberal rag than Newsweek, Kevin Bass (MS MD/PHD Student, Medical School) has penned a quite surprising (and ‘brave’) op-ed saying that “it’s time for the scientific community to admit we were wrong about COVID and it cost lives…”

[ZH: emphasis ours]

As a medical student and researcher, I staunchly supported the efforts of the public health authorities when it came to COVID-19.

I believed that the authorities responded to the largest public health crisis of our lives with compassion, diligence, and scientific expertise. I was with them when they called for lockdowns, vaccines, and boosters.

I was wrong. We in the scientific community were wrong. And it cost lives.

I can see now that the scientific community from the CDC to the WHO to the FDA and their representatives, repeatedly overstated the evidence and misled the public about its own views and policies, including on natural vs. artificial immunityschool closures and disease transmissionaerosol spreadmask mandates, and vaccine effectiveness and safety, especially among the young. All of these were scientific mistakes at the time, not in hindsight. Amazingly, some of these obfuscations continue to the present day.

But perhaps more important than any individual error was how inherently flawed the overall approach of the scientific community was, and continues to be. It was flawed in a way that undermined its efficacy and resulted in thousands if not millions of preventable deaths.

What we did not properly appreciate is that preferences determine how scientific expertise is used, and that our preferences might be—indeed, our preferences were—very different from many of the people that we serve. We created policy based on our preferences, then justified it using data. And then we portrayed those opposing our efforts as misguided, ignorant, selfish, and evil.

We made science a team sport, and in so doing, we made it no longer science. It became us versus them, and “they” responded the only way anyone might expect them to: by resisting.

We excluded important parts of the population from policy development and castigated critics, which meant that we deployed a monolithic response across an exceptionally diverse nation, forged a society more fractured than ever, and exacerbated longstanding heath and economic disparities.

A students adjusts her facemask at St. Joseph Catholic School in La Puente, California on November 16, 2020, where pre-kindergarten to Second Grade students in need of special services returned to the classroom today for in-person instruction. – The campus is the second Catholic school in Los Angeles County to receive a waiver approval to reopen as the coronavirus pandemic rages on. The US surpassed 11 million coronavirus cases Sunday, adding one million new cases in less than a week, according to a tally by Johns Hopkins University.FREDERIC J. BROWN / AFP

Our emotional response and ingrained partisanship prevented us from seeing the full impact of our actions on the people we are supposed to serve. We systematically minimized the downsides of the interventions we imposed—imposed without the input, consent, and recognition of those forced to live with them. In so doing, we violated the autonomy of those who would be most negatively impacted by our policies: the poor, the working class, small business owners, Blacks and Latinos, and children. These populations were overlooked because they were made invisible to us by their systematic exclusion from the dominant, corporatized media machine that presumed omniscience.

Most of us did not speak up in support of alternative views, and many of us tried to suppress them. When strong scientific voices like world-renowned Stanford professors John Ioannidis, Jay Bhattacharya, and Scott Atlas, or University of California San Francisco professors Vinay Prasad and Monica Gandhi, sounded the alarm on behalf of vulnerable communities, they faced severe censure by relentless mobs of critics and detractors in the scientific community—often not on the basis of fact but solely on the basis of differences in scientific opinion.

When former President Trump pointed out the downsides of intervention, he was dismissed publicly as a buffoon. And when Dr. Antony Fauci opposed Trump and became the hero of the public health community, we gave him our support to do and say what he wanted, even when he was wrong.

Trump was not remotely perfect, nor were the academic critics of consensus policy. But the scorn that we laid on them was a disaster for public trust in the pandemic response. Our approach alienated large segments of the population from what should have been a national, collaborative project.

And we paid the price. The rage of the those marginalized by the expert class exploded onto and dominated social media. Lacking the scientific lexicon to express their disagreement, many dissidents turned to conspiracy theories and a cottage industry of scientific contortionists to make their case against the expert class consensus that dominated the pandemic mainstream. Labeling this speech “misinformation” and blaming it on “scientific illiteracy” and “ignorance,” the government conspired with Big Tech to aggressively suppress it, erasing the valid political concerns of the government’s opponents.

And this despite the fact that pandemic policy was created by a razor-thin sliver of American society who anointed themselves to preside over the working class—members of academia, government, medicine, journalism, tech, and public health, who are highly educated and privileged. From the comfort of their privilege, this elite prizes paternalism, as opposed to average Americans who laud self-reliance and whose daily lives routinely demand that they reckon with risk. That many of our leaders neglected to consider the lived experience of those across the class divide is unconscionable.

Incomprehensible to us due to this class divide, we severely judged lockdown critics as lazy, backwards, even evil. We dismissed as “grifters” those who represented their interests. We believed “misinformation” energized the ignorant, and we refused to accept that such people simply had a different, valid point of view.

We crafted policy for the people without consulting them. If our public health officials had led with less hubris, the course of the pandemic in the United States might have had a very different outcome, with far fewer lost lives.

Instead, we have witnessed a massive and ongoing loss of life in America due to distrust of vaccines and the healthcare systema massive concentration in wealth by already wealthy elitesa rise in suicides and gun violence especially among the poor; a near-doubling of the rate of depression and anxiety disorders especially among the younga catastrophic loss of educational attainment among already disadvantaged children; and among those most vulnerable, a massive loss of trust in healthcarescience, scientific authorities, and political leaders more broadly.

My motivation for writing this is simple:

It’s clear to me that for public trust to be restored in science, scientists should publicly discuss what went right and what went wrong during the pandemic, and where we could have done better.

It’s OK to be wrong and admit where one was wrong and what one learned. That’s a central part of the way science works. Yet I fear that many are too entrenched in groupthink—and too afraid to publicly take responsibility—to do this.

Solving these problems in the long term requires a greater commitment to pluralism and tolerance in our institutions, including the inclusion of critical if unpopular voices.

Intellectual elitism, credentialism, and classism must end. Restoring trust in public health—and our democracy—depends on it.

The problem was not people’s ignorance of the facts, it was the organized antagonism and censorship against anyone presenting data that was contradictory to the mandate agenda. This is setting aside proclamations like those from the LA Times, which argued that mocking the deaths of “anti-vaxxers” might be necessary and justified.  After two years of this type of arrogant nonsense it’s hard to imagine people will be willing to pretend as if all is well.

The active effort to shut down any opposing data is the root crime, though, and no, it can never be forgotten or forgiven.

People are still livid…

One cannot help but notice that the timing of the Atlantic’s appeal for passive forgetfulness and now this op-ed mea culpa coincides with the swiftly approaching end of the COVID emergency declarations, amid a growing political backlash to the last two years of meaningless lockdowns and mandates, and Democrats were instrumental in the implementation of both.  A large swath of the population sees one party as the cause of much of their covid era strife.  

Perhaps the mainstream media is suddenly realizing that they may have to face some payback for their covid zealotry?  “We didn’t know! We were just following orders!”  It all sounds rather familiar.

*********

(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled and written by Tyler Durden

Header featured image (edited) credit:  Finger pointing  (KTSDESIGN/Science Photo Library)

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source

Pfizer knew its vaxx was a killer when it was rolled out by the D of D Operation Warp Speed

Pfizer knew its vaxx was a killer when it was rolled out by the D of D Operation Warp Speed

By Lyndesy Symonds

The bioweapon for the Australian CoVID Regime of the United [Communist] Nations is working just fine.

It is being deployed in within the legal, judicial, health and military framework of ‘the Kill Box’ . This is a military term which describes a construction that every member nation of the United [Communist] Nations is engaged in putting together under the WHO so that the bioweapon of the CoVID vaxx can be deployed as part of a military operation.

Contrary to popular imagination, the WHO is not a ‘Health’ Agency but is the military arm of the UN. And it has been tasked with depopulation in accordance with the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals.

The multi-lateral partners like WEF, Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, manufactured billionaire foundations are tasked with sections of the Operation only.

In Australia, a essential piece of legislation for the construction of the Australian ‘Kill Box” was the Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force Response to Emergencies) Bill 2020. This law amended the Defence Act 1903 (Defence Act) and the Defence Reserve Service (Protection) Act 2001 (DRSP Act). Its purpose was to enable Operation CoVID Shield, to enable foreign security forces to be deployed on Australian soil and to task and indemnify them from all criminal and and civil liabilities under Operation CoVID Shield. Its cover-story in Big Jew msm and the government was to facilitate the streamline for calling out members of the ADF Reserves, provide the Minister with certain powers to direct use of the ADF in an emergency, and to provide immunities to certain personnel while they are performing duties to support civil emergency and disaster preparedness, recovery and response.

The trail of contracts / contacts involved in this world-wide operation began to come into view with the discovery of evidence when the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency filed suit against the FDA for its refusal to provide the PHMPT with its data on Pfizer’s CoVID-19 ‘vaccine biological product file’.

Sept 16 , 2021.  PHMPT filed suit against the FDA in the US District Court, Northern District Texas.
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/001-Complaint-101021.pdf

United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Case 4:21-cv-01058-P
Document 1 Filed: Sept 16 2021
Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, Plaintiff
against
Food and Drug Administration, Defendant

Most of the comment on this case has centred around the release of the secret FDA-Pfizer report on the adversities of the vaxx. And it is shocking what Pfizer absolutely, positively knew when the vaxx was rolled out in the US under Operation Warp Speed.

But the Texas Court found that the FDA had no case to answer. That is the real eye-opener. Why?

The FDA successfully defended the case brought against them by the PHMPT.  They received  a ‘no case to answer’ judgement on the basis that they had no contractual obligation to test their vaxx for anything.  Their contract was only to deliver the vaxx.  Nothing more. Pfizer’s contract was with the Department of Defense, not the FDA or CDC or any health agency of the government.

And I will bet you any money that Pfizer’s contract will be the same here in Australia.

These health agencies and regulatory agencies are running cover for defence departments which are tasked under the WHO – the military arm of the United [Communist] Nations. And they are making a Kill Box.

The DOD Global Experiment
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ndG3QwHanVAa/

Source

Meanwhile in Australia they’re pushing the 5th dose

Free Your Mind – January 30th, 2023



SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

WE THOUGHT THE ANTI-VAXXERS WERE SILLY THEN MY DAUGHTER DROPS DEAD

OH MY GOD – January 30th, 2023


IT IS OUR CIVIL AND MORAL DUTY TO DO OUR BEST TO BREAK THE WALL OF CENSORSHIP AND TELL THE TRUTH TO THOSE WHO HAVE NOT SEEN IT YET.


SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

More Evidence the FDA Works for Pfizer as FDA Asks Pfizer to Submit Cancer Drug for Expanded Approval with Zero New Trials

More Evidence the FDA Works for Pfizer as FDA Asks Pfizer to Submit Cancer Drug for Expanded Approval with Zero New Trials

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

As the alternative media is distracted by the unfounded claim that Pfizer is using gain of function technology to develop new variants of COVID for future vaccines, Pfizer is quietly working together with the FDA to build their portfolio of drugs to make up for the loss of income due to decreasing numbers of people willing to continue getting injected with COVID shots.

The evidence that Pfizer controls the FDA continues to mount.

We previously reported how Pfizer virtually came out of nowhere to secure the first FDA authorization for experimental COVID shots in 2020, when the two drug companies that had received the most funding and attention to become the first ones to obtain the FDA nod for a new COVID “vaccine” had been Moderna, with their close links to Anthony Fauci and the NIH, and Astrazenca with its close links to Bill Gates.

Pfizer’s contract with Operation Warp Speed to receive funding for COVID-19 vaccines was different than the other pharmaceutical companies, because it was conditioned on them gaining FDA approval, and it did not include intellectual property rights for the U.S. government.

It appears that this opened the door for them to grant an exclusive deal with Israel in exchange for data on how the experimental shots affected people in Israel, effectively making Israel and its citizens lab rats. See:

Trump Claims he could “Easily” be Israeli PM – Is this why Pfizer Received First COVID Vaccine Authorization in U.S. and Exclusive Rights in Israel?

And a year before Pfizer became a late entry in the contest to get the first FDA authorization for a COVID shot, Dr. Scott Gottlieb joined the Board of Directors for Pfizer in June of 2019, just two months after he finished his term as Commissioner of the FDA under President Trump.

A year later, Operation Warp Speed awarded Pfizer almost $2 Billion to develop the COVID shot. See:

Former FDA Director Gottlieb Now Pfizer Board Member Secures $1.95 BILLION for COVID Vaccine

This week, Pfizer reported that they expect the sale of their COVID-19 shots and their antiviral Paxlovid to dramatically decrease here in 2023:

Despite a plan to jack up the price of Comirnaty to between $110 and $130 per dose when the United States goes to a commercial model this year for COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer expects revenue from the shot to plummet by 64% in 2023.

Pfizer also expects a 58% decrease in revenue from COVID-19 oral antiviral Paxlovid. The company revealed its 2023 expectations in its fourth quarter and 2022 full-year earnings report on Tuesday.

With the decreases, Pfizer is guiding to a revenue window of $67 billion to $71 billion in 2023.

The projections—which fell short of analyst expectations—put a damper on what might have been a day of celebration as Pfizer reported $100.3 billion in revenue for 2022, after generating $81.3 billion in sales in 2021. (Source.)

But what surprised people in the pharmaceutical industry the most about Pfizer’s forecast for 2023, was that in a “mysterious” FDA approval that was not reported in the media at the end of 2022, Pfizer received expanded use approval for their breast cancer drug Ibrance, and reportedly, the FDA is the one who approached them to expand the use of this drug!

Angus Liu of Fierce Pharma reported:

It’s unusual to have the FDA chase down a pharma company and ask them apply for a new drug indication. But Pfizer went through just that and has now quietly revealed a label expansion for blockbuster breast cancer med Ibrance.

The FDA has extended Ibrance’s approval in combination with an aromatase inhibitor to include newly diagnosed HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients regardless of menopausal status, Pfizer said Tuesday.

Previously, the combination of Ibrance and an aromatase inhibitor was limited to use in postmenopausal women. The FDA granted the new approval in mid-December, according to an approval letter (PDF), but Pfizer snuck the news into its fourth-quarter earnings announcement Tuesday.

There are other unconventional elements in this approval beyond Pfizer’s late, low-profile revelation.

For one, a review of Ibrance’s updated prescription information (PDF) shows no new efficacy data in the patient population.

The clinical efficacy section of Ibrance’s label still only includes results from the phase 3 PALOMA-2 trial—which tested a combination of Ibrance and Novartis’ aromatase inhibitor Femara in postmenopausal women newly diagnosed with HR+/HER2- breast cancer—and from the phase 3 PALOMA-3 study. The latter study tested Ibrance with AstraZeneca’s SERD drug Faslodex in previously treated patients regardless of menopausal status.

It was the FDA that proactively reached out to Pfizer in this case. In December 2021, the FDA requested that Pfizer file an application to include pre/perimenopausal women in Ibrance’s label, according to an FDA approval letter dated Dec. 13, 2022. Pfizer responded to the FDA’s request and submitted its application on March 11, 2022, the approval letter shows.

The new approval comes as Ibrance is under increased pressure from Novartis’ Kisqali and Eli Lilly’s Verzenio, particularly after the final overall survival analysis of the PALOMA-2 trial found Ibrance didn’t significantly improve patients’ life expectancy.

The unusual approval raises a question around the basis of FDA’s decision to request—and then approve—the Ibrance expansion. (Full article.)

Is there any doubt anymore about who controls the FDA? Pfizer is the largest criminal organization in the world, and they would not be able to continue earning huge profits without their control of the FDA.

And how many of you reading this article are co-owners and therefore co-conspirators with the criminal Pfizer company because your retirement fund owns stock in this company? How many members of Congress or State politicians own stock in this criminal organization?

See Also:

Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through

How to Determine if you are a Disciple of Jesus Christ or Not

Synagogue of Satan: Why It’s Time to Leave the Corporate Christian Church

Has Everyone Left You Because You are not Ashamed to Speak the Truth? Stay the Course!

When the World is Against You – God’s Power to Intervene for Those Who Resist

An Idolatrous Nation Celebrates “Freedom” Even Though They are Slaves to the Pharmaceutical Cult

What Happens When a Holy and Righteous God Gets Angry? Lessons from History and the Prophet Jeremiah

The Most Important Truth about the Coming “New World Order” Almost Nobody is Discussing

Insider Exposes Freemasonry as the World’s Oldest Secret Religion and the Luciferian Plans for The New World Order

Identifying the Luciferian Globalists Implementing the New World Order – Who are the “Jews”?

Published on January 31, 2023

Source

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)