US Federal Court Rules Death Caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 2)

US Federal Court Rules Death Caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 2)


US Federal Court Rules Death caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 2)

(To read part Part 1 before continuing see link below article)

By TLB Contributing Partner: Christina England, BA, Hons

This case is one of many from Shattered Dreams the HPV Vaccine Exposed.

Mrs Tarsell Takes the Case to Court

To medically investigate and support her claim, Emily’s attorney asked leading cardiologist and electrophysiologist, Professor Michael Eldar, M.D., FACC, FESC, FHRS, and leading immunologist, Professor Yehuda Shoenfeld, MD, FRCP, MaACR, to examine her daughter’s case in detail.

Tarsell vs. Department of Health and Human Services for the Death of Christina from Gardasil

Emily explained:

Four experts, two representing our family and two representing the government, attorneys for the respective sides and myself testified at the hearing on November 13-14, 2014. Special Master Christian Moran presided over the hearing. In the “vaccine court” there is no judge or jury.

Since there were no structural problems with Chris’s heart as confirmed by an earlier echocardiogram and by the coroner’s report, the problem was likely due to a disturbance in the rhythm of the heart, which is regulated by an electrophysiological process. Dr. Michael Eldar is a world-class expert in this field. Excerpts from his testimony and that of the other experts follow.”

The questions posed by Dr. Eldar were:

  1. What was the nature of the arrhythmia found in the ECG tracings of Christina Tarsell?

  1. Could this arrhythmia have caused her sudden death?”

The answers, according to Dr. Eldar’s report, were as follows:

  1. The arrhythmia was RVOT VPCs.

  1. The RVOT VPCs are the probable cause of death of Christina Tarsell.”

Emily explained to us that:

Regarding the nature of the arrhythmia, both the expert cardiologist representing the government, Dr. Scott Yeager, and Dr. Eldar agreed on review of Chris’s ECGs that the arrhythmia was of the type ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) rather than premature atrial contractions (PACs) as originally diagnosed by her primary care doctor.”

Dr. Eldar wrote:

Dr. Yeager reviewed the ECGs and he diagnosed the premature beats as ventricular premature complexes (VPCs), rather than PACs, originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). I examined two ECGs, recorded on November 20, 2007, and December 27, 2007, and I agree with the diagnosis of Dr. Yeager.”

Dr. Eldar continued that:

Dr. Yeager claims that this type of arrhythmia is common in adolescents and states that this type of VPCs is “usually felt to be at quite low risk, and may even be cleared for competitive athletics.” (Page 6)

While this claim is true for many cases of RVOT VPCs, it is definitely not true for all of them.”

He explained that whilst this information is true, there are different types of RVOT VPCs with different morphologies, and the type seen in Christina’s ECGs was consistent with types seen in people with normal hearts who developed life-threatening arrhythmia. This type is described in the literature as “malignant” RVOT VPCs. After giving several examples from papers that supported his claim, Dr. Eldar wrote:

In summary: the VPCs in the ECG tracings of Christina Tarsell were very similar in their form and in their CI to those described as malignant RVOT VPCs in the above mentioned studies.”

Dr. Eldar argued that the RVOT VPCs were the probable cause of Christina’s death. Furthermore, he pointed out that, in fact, Dr. Yeager had not actually denied that there was a possible causative connection between the VPCs and the sudden death of Christina, because in his report, Dr. Yeager had written that:

“It is impossible to know the role, if any, of this patient’s ventricular ectopy in her subsequent sudden death … Nonetheless, I find it difficult to discount her prior history of ventricular arrhythmia in light of her subsequent death, and I am suspicious that more detailed evaluation would have revealed a concerning pattern of ectopy, but I am by no means certain of a direct association.”

Regarding a temporal relationship between the vaccination and the onset of an arrhythmia, the medical records had revealed that Christina’s health only deteriorated after she had received the HPV vaccination, Gardasil.

In fact, the first time that her symptoms were recorded was after she had received her first shot of Gardasil and, according to reports, her symptoms increased with each subsequent Gardasil vaccination.

Dr. Eldar concluded that:

  1. Christina Tarsell’s arrhythmia was not documented before her first Gardasil shot.

  2. The erroneous interpretation of the premature beats as PACs rather than VPCs made them seem of low clinical importance. If properly diagnosed, a more thorough medical investigation (including stress test and a Holter monitor) might have revealed a more significant type of arrhythmia. This theory is also alluded to by Dr. Yeager in his report.

  3. I have shown that RVOT VPCs with the characteristics found in the present case are capable of triggering fatal arrhythmias (either VF or polymorphic VT) in apparently healthy individuals.

In conclusion, I find it more likely than not that the RVOT VPCs were the trigger of the sudden death of Christina Tarsell.”

While both experts agreed on the type of arrhythmia that Christina had experienced, the question remained as to whether her arrhythmia was induced by vaccination, and if so, by what mechanism?

This was addressed in full by Emily’s other expert, immunologist Dr. Yehuda Schoenfeld, with supporting testimony from Dr. Eldar.

Further Evidence That Gardasil Caused Christina Tarsell’s Death

Dr. Schoenfeld first challenged an opinion that had been submitted by Dr. Yeager, that perhaps Christina had inherited an undetected hereditary arrhythmia syndrome.

Dr. Schoenfeld wrote:

On page 4, Dr. Yeager states his opinion that the most probable reason for Christina’s sudden death was an undetected hereditary (genetic) arrhythmogenic syndrome. He provides no evidence to support his view.”

Dr. Schoenfeld continued:

With all due respect, but beliefs do not constitute as evidence in a court of law. Moreover, if there was history of genetic arrhythmogenic syndrome in the Tarsell family, it would be obvious, as such genetic abnormalities manifested in sudden death of relatives. In other words, they do not remain hidden and Christina’s death, in such case, would not have been the first.”

Emily reported to the court, that there was no family history of arrhythmia, sudden deaths from arrhythmia, or indeed any other form of heart disease. She explained what happened as Dr. Schoenfeld presented his testimony:

Dr. Schoenfeld then addressed the biologically possible mechanism at the cellular level by which the vaccine could cause death. The process is called molecular mimicry and it happens when proteins in HPV vaccines share a similarity with one’s own protein. The antibodies induced by the vaccine get confused and direct their attack to one’s own proteins as well as the intended HPV target.

Dr. Schoenfeld discovered a research paper which showed that the L1HPV 16 protein in Gardasil was similar to the the L-type calcium channel receptor in the heart. In certain individuals, the body then mounts an immune response to both the L-1 protein and L-type calcium channel receptor resulting in cross-reactivity and an autoimmune response.”

She explained that:

In summarizing the mechanism, attorney Mark Sadaka reiterated what Dr. Schoenfeld had written. He stated that:

Autoantibodies bound to the L-type calcium channels in Christina’s heart making them dysfunctional resulting in an influx of calcium into the heart cells. The increased concentration of calcium in the heart cells caused her ventricular premature contractions which led to her death. After each additional Gardasil vaccination, more calcium entered the heart resulting in a worsening of her arrhythmia and ultimately her death.”

Dr. Schoenfeld’s proposed mechanism was further supported by Dr. Eldar, who stated that:

Based on my previous report (14/7/2014) and the report of Dr.Yeager, (23/4/2014) the death of Christina Tarsell was caused by fatal ventricular arrhythmia related to the RVOT VPCs recorded previously in 2 ECG tracings. Gardasil, by causing increased L-type Ca current (Prof. Shoenfeld’s supplemental report), may be implicated in causing the RVOT VPCs, which triggered the ventricular arrhythmia that caused the premature death of Christina Tarsell.”

Emily told us that:

The expert immunologist for the government was S. Michael Phillips, M.D., F.A.C.P, whose main argument was to refute a link between Chris’s death and Gardasil vaccination, based on epidemiology and was summarized and addressed by Dr. Schoenfeld, who stated:

On page 6, Dr. Phillips addresses the question regarding Gardasil, and whether this vaccine might have triggered the sudden unexpected death in Christina’s case. He comes to the conclusion that Gardasil can be excluded as a possible trigger because in his review of the relevant literature, Dr. Phillips found no evidence of an increased signal of such adverse events linked to Gardasil vaccination. He cites the fact that thus far, 100 million doses of Gardasil have been distributed worldwide and if there was a real risk of sudden deaths, vaccine surveillance safety programs would have picked it up by now. However, it should be noted that for any vaccine the number of doses that are eventually administered is much lower than the number of doses that are distributed. Thus, calculations based on the latter tend to underestimate the rate of vaccine-associated adverse events. Supporting this interpretation, it was previously shown that for any of the two HPV vaccines currently on the market, the reported rate of adverse reactions per 100,000 doses administered was very similar across different countries and approximately 7 times higher than that calculated from the number of distributed doses. Moreover, given that worldwide, vaccine surveillance programmes routinely rely on passive reporting, the rate of rare but nonetheless serious adverse events causally linked to HPV vaccination might have escaped detection. The fact again remains that a previously healthy young woman died from a cardiac arrest, less than 3 weeks following her 3rd dose of Gardasil, thus in clear temporal relationship with the administration of the vaccine. The analysis of U.S. VAERS data by Slade et al. shows that there were reports of sudden unexpected deaths following Gardasil and although the signal for sudden deaths was not significant, a notable proportion of these events were due to cardiac abnormalities and their temporal relationship with the HPV vaccine falls within the same time-frame as in Christina’s case (less than 3 weeks following vaccination).”” (emphasis added)

Dr. Shoenfeld concluded by summarising that the evidence presented over two days of testimony had satisfied all three prongs stipulated by the Court of Federal Claims to win a judgment: He stated that:

In conclusion, as I stated previously in my report, in Christina Tarsell’s case we have:

(1) a medically plausible mechanism of cause and effect showing that the vaccination could have caused the injury;

(2) a clear temporal relationship between vaccination and injury (3 weeks);

(3) previous precedents where the same vaccine caused the same type of injury and within the same timeframe [2] and finally;

(4) lack of any reasonable alternative causes that could explain her condition.

Therefore, it is more likely than not that Gardasil was the cause of the tragic death of Christina Tarsell.”

The evidence presented to the court from both of these experts was supported by reams of published, peer-reviewed papers, medical records, numerous expert reports, decades of experience and thousands of hours of work, and it appeared that the government had no alternative explanation for what had happened to Christina.

This made the experts’ evidence all the more compelling. Therefore, it would have been easy at this stage to presume that Emily and her team had met their burden of proof.

However, as Emily would soon discover, it would take more than two of the world’s leading experts armed with an arsenal of evidence to persuade the vaccine court’s Special Master that the HPV vaccine was responsible for Christina’s death.

Death from Gardasil Litigation Continues in the US Court of Federal Claims

Emily told us that:

Special Master Moran rendered a decision on February 16, 2016, a year and three months after the hearing. Astonishingly, he ruled against us by ignoring the evidence.”

Emily explained to us that:

In the Court of Federal Claims, when a decision by the Special Master is contested, the plaintiff can appeal to a higher authority.”

She told us that she and her team were appalled that Moran had ignored and misinterpreted important evidence and testimonies written by experts.

She stated that:

Attorney Sadaka filed an appeal on March 16, 2016, that was strongly critical of Special Master Moran for “egregious distortions” and judgments that were “arbitrary and capricious” and “deprived the petitioner of a fair hearing.” What happened next was precedent-setting.”

Emily explained that:

The case then went to a judge and was assigned to Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. The judge reviewed all of the evidence and filed her decision on June 30, 2017, more than a year after receiving the case. The Judge wrote a 22-page critic of the ruling made by Special Master Moran. She cited instances where the Special Master had ignored critical evidence and made multiple errors of judgment and errors of law. Judge Coster Williams then  remanded the case back to Special Master Moran and directed him to consider all of the evidence and the rules of law in the “vaccine court.””

In Judge Coster Williams’ report [4], she made her views on the Tarsell case perfectly clear. One of the key points of contention was whether or not Christina’s arrhythmia had existed prior to her receiving the vaccination.

In his ruling, the Special Master had stated that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate that the arrhythmia had not existed before the vaccination, and he had appeared to have ignored all the evidence that the Tarsell family had submitted.

In her report, Judge Coster Williams stated:

“… the Special Master ignored medical record evidence from Christina’s treating physicians that showed she did not have arrhythmia prior to her vaccine.”

On page 21 of her extremely thorough report, Judge Coster Williams concluded that:

Petitioner’s motion for review is GRANTED. The Special Master’s decision denying compensation is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the Special Master for further proceedings consistent with this decision. The Court makes no factual findings of its own.

On remand the Special Master shall reassess whether Petitioner met Althen’s Prongs One, Two and Three and whether she is entitled to compensation, consistent with the legal principles articulated in this opinion.”

Emily explained that:

The truth is that all experts agreed that Christina died from an arrhythmia and her 20-year medical history was extensively reviewed by Judge Coster Williams, who cited 30 specific medical appointments which show that arrhythmia was not reported prior to vaccination (tabulated on page 22 of the Judge’s report).”

Secondly, the Judge determined that we had met our burden of proof regarding a “biologically plausible” theory causally connecting the vaccination with the injury. “Biologically plausible” is the legal standard in the vaccine court.

Thirdly, the Judge also instructed the Special Master to consider the evidence for Challenge-Rechallenge which he had ignored. In short, on remand, the SM was instructed to “consider all evidence on a logical sequence of cause and effect linking Gardasil and Christina’s death.”

On remand, the Special Master Moran followed the legal directives which led him to reverse his decision. He then ruled that we had indeed met our burden of proof for the court of Federal Claims and were entitled to compensation.”

Special Master Moran’s second and final ruling was filed on September 25, 2017. He wrote:

The undersigned finds that the challenge-rechallenge evidence is sufficiently probative that this presentation carries Ms. Tarsell’s burden of proof.”

He continued that:

Ultimately, because of the finding that Christina began to experience arrhythmia after her HPV vaccination, Ms. Tarsell has presented preponderant evidence of a logical sequence of cause and effect, connecting the HPV vaccination to the ensuing arrhythmia.”

He concluded:

The Court’s Opinion and Order required additional consideration consistent with the legal principles articulated by the Court for analyzing the evidence in this tragic case about a woman, Christina Tarsell, who died much too young. Under the approach dictated by the Court, Ms. Tarsell is entitled to compensation. The parties should anticipate that a separate order regarding damages will issue shortly.”

Emily explained how she felt after the Special Master had made his final decision:

The first sense of justice, joy and relief came when Judge Coster Williams considered our evidence and validated our appeal. That was just awesome and restored my faith in the legal process. We anticipated at that point that the Special Master would reverse his decision since he was basically over ruled by a higher authority. However, there was still one more hurdle before we could declare victory. The government had a window of opportunity to appeal the final decision by the Special Master. It is very telling that the government did not appeal the final decision. Their opportunity to appeal expired on March 30, 2018, eight years after the case was filed. By not appealing, the government (HHS) thereby conceded that we had proved by preponderance of evidence that Gardasil vaccinations killed Christina.

Speaking of a higher authority, from the moment I realized that Gardasil killed Chris, I felt that I was summoned by a Higher Consciousness for a mission on behalf of my daughter and others injured by the vaccine. Sometimes we don’t choose our battles; they choose us. This was before I had an attorney or experts and I had to trust that the path to truth would unfold.

Amazingly, the right people, the right attorney, the right science and scientists, and the right judge all coalesced for the truth to prevail. So the victory was also a validation of my faith.

It has been difficult. In addition to loosing my only child whom I loved with all of my heart, I have been viciously attacked on media and even privately, quietly dismissed by some from whom I expected support. So having the truth validated by the legal system is a big crack in the wall of denial regarding Gardasil-induced injuries and death.

There are those who will try to cover up or minimize the crack or distract you with lies and bribes for their own selfish or naive reasons. So, the “battle” is not over ,but our victory is precedent-setting because it is the first Gardasil death case to win a judgment.

My heart goes out to all of the thousands of families whose beautiful children have died or been seriously injured by HPV vaccinations. Some cases have prevailed in the vaccine court in the US and in other courts across the world. But most people don’t know about their legal options or learn too late after the statute of limitations had expired. Others are blocked from justice by the barriers of discovery and other systemic impediments.

I feel gratitude that Chris’s Gardasil-induced death case was not just swept under the carpet. Her favorite sport was baseball and with her win, she has scored a huge home run. I’m still on deck and ready to go to bat to save lives.”

Through dogged determination, perseverance, blood, sweat and tears and with truth on their side, Emily and her exceptional team, Attorney Sadaka, Dr. Eldar and Dr. Schoenfeld, prevailed.

This case was never about financial gain. They knew Emily would not settle. This case was always about getting justice for Christina and holding the government accountable for HPV vaccine deaths and injuries.

Christina is sadly just one of a growing number of individuals who have lost their lives after receiving a vaccine that has been deemed safe and effective by governments from around the world. By proving with preponderance of evidence that this vaccine was responsible for Christina’s death, Ms. Tarsell has paved the way for others to get the justice they deserve.

We would like to thank Ms. Tarsell for her bravery, for allowing us to read her daughter’s reports and for agreeing to participate in this book.

••••

References

  1. World Health Organisation (WHO) VigiAccess database. Accessed August 13, 2018. Available here

  2. Lyons-Weller, James. Who and What Killed Christina Tarsell # NotOneMore. Mercury Project. 2018. Available here

  3. Human Resources and Services Administration. National Injury Compensation Progam, Official Website. Available here

  4. Coster Williams, Mary Ellen, Judge. United States Court of Federal Claims. June 2017. Available here

  5. Moran, Christian J. Special Master. United States Court of Federal Claims. September 2017. Available here

••••

US Federal Court Rules Death Caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 1)

••••

Read more articles by Christina England

••••

Note from Christina:

Arlo was rescued from Romania when he was just six months old, after being born with deformed front legs and dumped outside a railway station.

I have been fostering him for the past year and after a massive fundraising effort, have raised enough money to have surgery to straighten his left leg and fuse his wrist.

This surgery was performed last week and was a great success. However, this has left him lopsided and he now needs similar surgery on his right leg.

Please donate anything that you can to help this darling little boy to stand tall and walk on all four legs for the first time. Thank you.

Please consider donating through my fundraiser, where you can see more of his story.

Or through my PayPal christina128@live.co.uk

Thank you.

••••

About the Author: Christina England, BA Hons, Research Journalist and Author

Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. She left school to work in a children’s library, specialising in storytelling and book buying. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980.

After taking an A Level in Psychology and a BTEC in Learning Support, Ms. England spent many years researching vaccines and adverse reactions. She gained a Higher National Diploma in Journalism and Media Studies in 2010 and in 2016 she gained a BA Hons degree in Literature and Humanities. She currently writes for VacTruth, Health Impact News, GreenMedInfo, The Liberty Beacon, Vaccine Impact and Medical Kidnap on immunisation safety and efficacy.

She has co-authored the book – Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis – Are Parents Being Falsely Accused? with Dr. Harold Buttram and Vaccination Policy and the UK Government: The Untold Truth with Lucija Tomljenovic PhD, which are sold on Amazon. She also compiled the book Shattered Dreams: The HPV Vaccine Exposed

Her website is Parents and Carers Against Medical Injustice

••••

Click on image below to visit site:

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

Eagle’s Eye Report: Big Pharma & Child Abuse

Eagle’s Eye Report: Big Pharma & Child Abuse


Eagle’s Eye Report: Big Pharma & Child Abuse (Archived)

90 Minute Special

Host: Roger Landry (TLB) – Co-Host & Producer: Stephen Roberts

Brought to you by: TLBTalk.com – Where Freedom Roars

Live Broadcast platform: ShakeAndWake Radio Network

Also on PSN Radio and SoFloRadio live.

Listen to Archived Show below intro article

See appropriate links below Archived Show

Intro by: Roger Landry (TLB)

Welcome again to Episode #9 of the Eagle’s Eye Report. Hosted by myself, Roger Landry (TLB), and Co-Hosted and Produced by my good friend and fellow patriot – Stephen Roberts. The title of today’s show is … Big Pharma & Child Abuse. The mission of this show is to be a mechanism for communicating the truth and facts in a country increasingly forbidding of these very concepts.

No, as I say weekly, this not a pleasant way to introduce a show … but today reality is blatant and not very pleasant in many aspects. Thus the reason, and intent behind the Eagle’s Eye Report.

Our mission is to keep you armed with the vital truth, as well as to present you with a platform where you can discuss these vital issues without fear of censorship or exclusion, that being the sponsor of this show … TLBTalk.com.

Now it’s down to business …

••••

Big Pharma & Child Abuse

If ever we are approached by danger or violence on just about any level, who is the first to be protected, to be hustled off to a safe area, or to be worried over with the utmost attention and focus? That would of-course be any children present, be they ours or not. For most normal adults this is very close to an instinctive action, being so close to automatic that it is difficult to even remember any forethought involved …

DANGER = PROTECT THE CHILDREN !!!

and for the most part (98% or better) we do! If a child is playing in the street and a car suddenly turns the corner and is bearing down on on them at a speed that leaves said child frozen in fear, a vast majority of adults would (almost) instinctively rush out into the street to push the child out of the path of the onrushing vehicle … even at the probable expense of their own safety or life. To any sane adult our children are the most precious asset, and the very future of, humanity, so to act in any other fashion is not really acceptable as a societal or a personal norm.

Yet today we will discuss an entity, mainly trusted by a very large portion of humanity, that not only totally disregards this premise … but specifically and knowingly puts our very youngest (babies) and toddlers in harms way as a matter of business and profit. Yes this is done knowingly and with foreknowledge by being the original source of the research clearly stating that these very actions are harmful and quite possibly even deadly to our babies/children.

No I am not exaggerating or pushing fear porn to make a personal point or to grandstand a situation that does not warrant it. As a matter of fact, if anything my pulpit is not high enough, nor is my bullhorn loud enough !!!

So let’s dig into this massive and unforgivable tyranny …

This episode is based on an article published by Dr. Mercola titled: Why Big Pharma Is Desperate to Get COVID Jab Into Babies. Yes that is the actual title and I’m sure you may now have a clearer understanding of why I chose this article to base this show on. As usual my commentary, opinion, and understandings are also a part of this presentation.

Let’s start this with a couple of slaps of reality:

Statistics show the rate of COVID associated hospitalization among children aged 5 to 11 is 0.0008%. Deaths are even more rare! In real-world terms, that’s so close to zero you basically cannot lower it any further. Yet, despite such reassuring data, children in this age group are urged to get two to three doses of the COVID jab, even though side effects of the injection could harm them for life, or kill them. In other words … it is a FACT that the supposed cure is far more dangerous to these children than the disease would ever be …

••••

As if the situation were not blatant enough already, June 15, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s vaccine advisory panel — the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) — unanimously approved (21-0) to grant Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID shots for infants and young children.

••••

Dr. Clare Craig, a diagnostic pathologist, points out that of the 4,526 children, aged 6 months to 4 years, who participated in Pfizer’s trial, 3,000 didn’t make it to the end of the trial. Why did two-thirds of the children drop out? Oftentimes, this happens when side effects are too severe for the participant to continue. Here, we don’t know why two-thirds of the participants were eliminated, and “on that basis alone, this trial should be deemed null and void …

••••

As noted by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, vaccinating infants and children who have no need for the shots and don’t benefit from them, just to “protect” adults, violates medical ethics. And since those who are jabbed still readily transmit the virus, the children are actually put at risk for no reason at all.

••••

Big Pharma needs this last remaining age group to be included (infants and toddlers) under the EUA, because once the emergency is finally declared ‘over,’ the next phase of liability shielding requires that the shots receive approval by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

Once the vaccine is on the childhood vaccination schedule, the vaccine makers are permanently shielded from liability for injuries and deaths that occur in ANY age group, including adults.

••••

So fasten your seat-belt and – Listen Up …

••••

Eagle’s Eye Report: Big Pharma & Child Abuse (Archived)

(Click on image below to listen to show)

SO BIG PHARMA WILL “KNOWINGLY” MAIM AND KILL OUR CHILDREN IN ORDER TO PROTECT THEIR PROFITS AND PREVENT CORPORATE LIABILITIES … OR … GENOCIDE ANYONE ???

••••

Show Talking Points from the following article:

The Reason Big Pharma Is Desperate to Get the Jab Into Babies

••••

Related article/video:

Dr. Rima Laibow – DEVASTATING! 90% of the Global Population Will Die – Globalist Agenda

••••

More Episodes of Eagle’s Eye Report (click on image below)

••••

About the Articles Author Roger Landry (TLB) spent about three decades of his adult life either in, or working for the military, with about two decades working directly for the Military Industrial Complex facilitating DOD contracts. His awakening to Political, Economic, and Health realities was about twelve short years ago. Since that time he has founded The Liberty Beacon Project (TLB) consisting of a half dozen proprietary global websites, media projects and partner websites across the planet. He contributes regularly to multiple forums both in and outside of TLB Project. Most of his work can be found on the TLB Flagship website TheLibertyBeacon.com

Image credit: Image of Joe Biden & Kamala Harris, In Public Domain – All other image credits on articles linked above.

••••

Click on the image below to visit/join our sponsors site:

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

The Best Takedown of the CDC’s ‘Politicized’ C-19 Response That You’ll Ever See

The Best Takedown of the CDC’s ‘Politicized’ C-19 Response That You’ll Ever See


 The Best Takedown of the CDC’s ‘Politicized’ Covid Response That You’ll Ever See

Becker News

Dr. Robert Malone delivered the most sensible, credible and powerful criticism of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s ‘politicized’ response to Covid out there.

“I’m honored to be here,” Dr. Malone said. “I’m here on a voluntary basis at the request of the committee. My name is Robert Wallace Malone. I’m a physician licensed in Maryland at graduate of UC Davis, UC San Diego, University of Maryland and Northwestern University, as well as Harvard for a fellowship in clinical research.”

“I spent my career working in the field of medicine, particularly in vaccine technology and biodefense,” he went on. “I am a vaccinologist. Earlier in my career, I had a series of discoveries when I was at the Salk Institute that led to nine issued patents filed approximately 1989 to 1990, that are considered by most to be the foundation technology upon which the mRNA vaccines have been built. There have been additional advances since then. I don’t take credit and I did not in any way claim to have invented these vaccines. Just wanted to get that out.”

“I’m a specialist in clinical research, medical affairs, regulatory affairs, project management, proposal management, particularly large federal grants and contracts, vaccines, and biodefense,” Dr. Malone added. “I’ve won well over 2 billion in grants and contracts. I often chair or in the past have chaired study sections for large vaccine grants and contracts for the NIAID. I’ve met Tony Fauci multiple times.”

“I am a deep specialist in government affairs, particularly in the vaccines and biodefense space,” he continued. “I particularly work with the defense threat reduction agency historically, so a branch of the Department of Defense focused on bio defense.”

“I’m here to talk to you about the policies relating to vaccines in early treatment for SARS-CoV-2 through the various surges and my thoughts and recommendations for future public health events as the committee has requested that I do,” Dr. Malone said. “I’ll do so to the best of my ability in speaking plainly. I hope that nothing I say will offend. That’s not my intention and I’m certainly not here to point fingers or to cause rifts or conflict in terms of my own experience.”

“I’ve been deeply involved in multiple prior outbreak responses, including AIDS,” he continued. “The post anthrax and smallpox scare actually did a lot of the due diligence for the smallpox vaccine products for the Department of Defense and their adverse events. I’m deeply experienced in influenza, vaccine development, Ebola, Zika, and now SARS-CoV-2. I’ve been working nonstop on SARS-CoV-2 since I got a phone call from Wuhan, from a member of the intelligence community on January 2nd, 2020.”

“During prior outbreaks, in my experience, CDC served as a reliable source of impartial, up-to-date, and accurate public health data for physicians, state, and local local public health officials,” Dr. Malone said. “Prior to SARS-CoV-2, the teaching and practice in governmental response has been that the federal CDC advises state public health authorities who have the authority and responsibility, according to the U.S. Constitution, to manage their own public health policies and regulate the practice of medicine. This is your responsibility.”

“And up until the present, that’s always been acknowledged,” he added. “The role of the federal government is in consultation and support and advice. This approach has not been implemented during the COVID crisis, as we’ve been discussing during SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 outbreak, new policies and practices have been implemented the NIH and particularly NIAID have developed propagated treatment protocols throughout the United States.”

“In most cases, the protocols developed by the NIH have been developed in a non-transparent manner without hearings or significant public comment by independent physicians, practicing physicians,” Dr. Malone said. “Apparently these have been developed largely under the strong influence and oversight of a small number of government officials, predominantly Dr. Fauci and his former trainee, Dr. Birx, particularly under the prior administration.”

“Development of vaccine products have been accelerated in historic nonclinical, clinical development and regulatory practices have been discarded in a quest for speed under specific pressure from the executive branch in the prior administration,” he added. “Development of repurposed drugs and treatment strategies have paradoxically been aggressively blocked or inhibited by both NIH and FDA. Apparently due to requirements in the federal Emergency Use Authorization statute language, requiring lack of available alternatives as a predicate to granting emergency use authorization to a new product, including a vaccine product. In this case with this outbreak, the CDC has played a more supportive role to NIH, in contrast to prior where NIH/NIAID has focused on clinical research and early product development and the CDC is focused on public health policy.”

“We know according to the New York Times article on President’s Day, that the CDC has become politicized, particularly during the current administration, and has actively withheld information, which has been deemed as posing risk for exacerbating vaccine hesitancy during the current outbreak,” Malone said. “The CDC has not fulfilled its traditional role as a neutral collector arbiter and reporter of public health data. CDC has, under FOIA, admitted to failing to perform obligated monitoring analysis and reporting of VAERS and related vaccine safety data.”

“We heard testimony earlier about the reliance of the state of Texas personnel on the evaluation of VAERS from the CDC,” he added. “And we now know that the CDC failed to perform their required tasks relating to VAES analysis assigned to them by Congress. As a consequence, neither patients, physicians nor public health officials have been able to assess up to date information concerning vaccine effectiveness and safety.”

“This has compromised the informed consent process,” he continued. “CDC has actively promoted in marketed vaccination with an unlicensed Emergency Use Authorized product with over $1 billion in U.S. federal funding, expanded to both market the products and to censor those who’ve raised concerns regarding vaccine safety and effectiveness. This is not an opinion. It is well-documented through Freedom of Information Act document disclosure.”

“FDA, NIH, and CDC together with World Health Organization have cooperated to actively restrict, demean, and deprecate the use of multiple currently available licensed drugs for treatment of COVID-19 by licensed practicing physicians, who are the ones who have the authority to establish local standard of care — not the CDC and not the NIAID. And have facilitated retaliation against physicians who did not follow the treatment guidelines established and promoted by the NIH. I was very glad to hear that is not happening with the hospital that was just testifying.”

“Historically, the NIH has neither mandate nor significant prior experience in developing and implementing universal treatment guidance and protocols and has done so in a unilateral manner without seeking meaningful input from practicing physicians,” he went on. “NIH leadership has acted to restrict and retaliate against highly qualified, independent physicians and medical scientists who question federal management policies. We know this most notably in the case of the Great Barrington Declaration, and the primary authors of that document. Again, Freedom of Information [Act], disclosures of emails, It’s incontrovertible.

“On a national basis without respect for state boundaries, this is key, or coordination with state governments, NIH and CDC have actively engaged with and directly paid corporate media and technology and social media companies to promote federal positions and policies, and to censor any discussions of policies, risks, adverse events, or treatment options, other those than those, which they have endorsed, again, multiple FOIA documents demonstrate this.” Dr. Malone said.

“There is evidence in the case of the State of Florida and Governor Ron DeSantis that the federal government has intentionally withheld monoclonal antibody therapeutics as political retaliation for COVID crisis management policies implemented by the State of Florida, which are not aligned with federal government policies and mandates,” Dr. Malone added. “Now in section three of the request from the committee, from my comment, they asked a series of questions relating to the effects of vaccines and the now remarkably enhanced reinfection rate in the United States population.”

“Those questions included some detailed, let’s say, ‘inside baseball’ questions, having to do with the nuance of nomenclature of effectiveness or efficacy, et cetera,” he noted. “I am going to pass over those unless there’s reasons for questions that are available to you in the document, in the interest of time.”

“During the COVID crisis, the use of the terms, ‘immunity’ and ‘effectiveness’ have been applied creatively by the NIH and CDC leadership,” he remarked. “First to refer to prevention of infection, replication, and spread. Then as those endpoints were not being met by the vaccines to prevention from hospitalization and death. Then as those endpoints were only partially achievable to a relative reduction in hospitalization and death, which currently, based on the latest peer review data, is in the range of between 30 and 60% of fully vaccinated persons in high-risk categories are still at risk of hospitalization and death.”

This testimony before the Texas State Senate is the serious and rigorous criticism of the federal government’s Covid response that the American people need to hear.

*********

(TLB) published this video/article from Backer News as compiled and written by Kyle Becker

Header featured image (edited) cretit: Dr. Malone/theepochtimes.com/dr-robert-malone

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

Another pile of dead vaxed people. They just keep piling up.

Another pile of dead vaxed people. They just keep piling up.

Jim Crenshaw – June 28th, 2022

If enough of these poor people pile up will that cause a wake up?
Source: JBossman008 on 153news.net

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

The Reason Big Pharma Is Desperate to Get the Jab Into Babies

The Reason Big Pharma Is Desperate to Get the Jab Into Babies


Story at-a-glance

  • The rate of COVID-19 associated hospitalization among children aged 5 to 11 is just 0.0008%. In real-world terms, that’s so close to zero you basically cannot lower it any further

  • Despite that, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s vaccine advisory panel — the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) — on June 15, 2022, unanimously approved to grant Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID shots for infants and young children

  • Pfizer’s EUA is for a three-dose regimen (3-microgram shots) for children 6 months to 5 years old; Moderna’s EUA is for a two-dose regimen (25-microgram shots) for children 6 months to 6 years

  • In granting this EUA, the FDA again ignored injury and death data and swept medical ethics aside

  • The drug companies need this last remaining age group to be included under the EUA, because once the emergency is finally declared “over,” the next phase of liability shielding requires that the shots receive approval by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Once the vaccine is on the childhood vaccination schedule, the vaccine makers are permanently shielded from liability for injuries and deaths that occur in any age group, including adults

••••

••••

Why Big Pharma Is Desperate to Get COVID Jab Into Babies

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

Statistics show the rate of COVID-19 associated hospitalization among children aged 5 to 11 is 0.0008%.1 In real-world terms, that’s so close to zero you basically cannot lower it any further. Yet, despite such reassuring data, children in this age group are urged to get two to three doses of the COVID jab, even though side effects of the injection could harm them for life, or kill them.

As noted by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation in the video below, myocarditis — one of the recognized effects of the COVID jab — “has a mortality rate of 25% to 56% within three to 10 years, owing to progressive heart failure and sudden cardiac death.”

Sudden cardiac death is what the media and public health agencies are now glibly referring to as “sudden adult death syndrome” or SADS. The older and more appropriate description for SADS is “sudden arrhythmic death syndrome,” but they don’t even want to use the word “arrhythmic” anymore, as that tells you what the death is really caused by, and many are now aware that the jab can cause heart inflammation.

By avoiding the word “arrhythmic,” it’s easier for them to pretend as though people are dying for no apparent reason, and certainly not because of the COVID shots. Still, real-world facts tell us that SADS didn’t take off until after the shots were rolled out, and the vast majority of young healthy people who suddenly die for no apparent reason have been jabbed.2

Also, understand that if your child or you are injured by the shot, you cannot sue the drug company for damages and, so far, the U.S. government has rejected all but one of the claims filed with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).3 At the current pace of about 18 claims a month, it would take 38 years just to get through the current backlog, Reuters has noted.4 Basically, many may die before their case even gets through review.

COVID Jab Authorization Granted for Babies

As if the situation were not bad enough already, June 15, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s vaccine advisory panel — the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) — unanimously approved (21-0) to grant Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID shots for infants and young children.5

Pfizer’s EUA is for a three-dose regimen (3-microgram shots) for children 6 months to 5 years old, while Moderna’s EUA is for a two-dose regimen (25-microgram shots) for children 6 months to 6 years.

In the video at the top of the page, Steve Kirsch, president of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, interviews reporter Toby Rogers, who endured the entire nine-hour day of the recent VRBPAC meeting.

The day before that meeting, June 14, Rogers published6 a written summary of Pfizer’s trial on young children, which he referred to as “an embarrassment.” “Any VRBPAC member who votes Aye on this junk science application should be removed from his/her job,” he wrote. Apparently, they all need to go.

In the interview, Rogers laments the fact that the VRBPAC members remain “locked in their information bubble” and won’t allow any conflicting data to influence their preconceived biases.

As noted by Rogers, they have a sacred duty to protect public health, and they’re being flippant about it. They’re ignoring data, they’re ignoring the pleas of the vaccine injured, they’re ignoring serious questions, they’re ignoring everything except the flimsiest bits and pieces upon which their narrative is built. Rogers called the experience “heartbreaking.”

VRBPAC Refuses to Answer Lawmakers’ Questions

The VRBPAC members aren’t even swayed by concerns from lawmakers. They simply ignore their questions too. As reported by The Defender:7

“The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) ignored pleas from experts, the vaccine injured and a congressman representing 17 other lawmakers to halt authorization until questions about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines for the nation’s youngest children could be properly addressed …

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) said there are many unanswered questions … ‘I’m deeply concerned that the push to vaccinate these children is nothing more than a dystopian experiment with unknown consequences,’ Gohmert told the committee. ‘Some of us have outlined these questions in a letter8 to VRBPAC but have not received any answers, and I pose some of them here.’ Gohmert said:

‘Number 1, why has the FDA refused to release the hundreds of thousands of pages of data from preapproval manufacturer studies, post-approval adverse events data and other post-approval manufacturer data?

Number 2, what is the cardiac risk factor in administrating these COVID vaccines to children?

Number 3, world-renowned immunologists have raised concerns about potential antibody-dependent enhancement, or ADE, resulting from COVID vaccines, and since ADE was a problem in prior unrelated respiratory vaccine trials, we need to know what studies, if any, the FDA has that it’s used regarding ADE from COVID vaccines in children 5 and under or any age group. Can the FDA affirm there’s no risk of ADE for vaccinated children?

Number 4, if widely approved among children 5 and under, how many lives, if any, does FDA estimate will be saved next year? Given the injuries reported in the FDA’s VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] system, how will FDA evaluate serious vaccine injuries versus serious COVID outcomes?

Number 5, is it possible the proposed COVID vaccines in young children could create increased risk in future novel COVID variants?

Number 6, why has the FDA recently lowered the efficacy bar for COVID vaccines for youngest children? This change significantly lowers the expected benefits from any COVID vaccination for young children and it’s of particular concern given that over 70% of that age cohort already is seropositive.’

Gohmert said these questions and 13 other questions posed by lawmakers are critical and deserve answers from the FDA and VRBPAC prior to any EUA with the ‘accompanied protection for liability for all harm done.’”

Trial Showed COVID Jab Increases Infection Risk in Babies

In the video above, you can see Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, with a forced grin on her face, claiming “rigorous scientific review” has proven the shots to be safe and effective in infants and young children.

The video also features excerpts from a video in which Dr. Clare Craig, a diagnostic pathologist and “lover of data,”9 reviews what this “rigorous scientific review” actually found and what the FDA and CDC aren’t telling you. To hear Craig’s full summary of how Pfizer twisted its clinical data for young children, check out the video below.

Craig points out that of the 4,526 children, aged 6 months to 4 years, who participated in Pfizer’s trial, 3,000 didn’t make it to the end of the trial. Why did two-thirds of the children drop out? Oftentimes, this happens when side effects are too severe for the participant to continue. Here, we don’t know why two-thirds of the participants were eliminated, and “on that basis alone, this trial should be deemed null and void,” Craig says. Moreover:

Six of the children, aged 2 to 4 years, in the vaccinated group were diagnosed with “severe COVID,” compared to just one in the placebo group. So, what this actually shows is that the likelihood the shot is causing severe COVID is higher than the likelihood that it’s preventing it.

The only child who required hospitalization for COVID was also in the “vaccinated” group.

In the three weeks following the first dose, 34 of the children in the vaccinated group and 13 of the unvaccinated children were diagnosed with COVID. That means the children’s risk of developing symptoms of COVID within the first three weeks of the first dose actually increased by 30%. These data were ignored.

Between doses two and three, there was an eight-week gap, and the vaccinated arm again experienced higher rates of COVID. This too was ignored. After the third dose, incidence of COVID was again raised in the vaccine group, and this was ignored as well.

In the end, they only counted three cases of COVID in the vaccine arm and seven cases in the placebo group. They literally ignored 97% of all the COVID cases that occurred during the trial to conclude that the shots were “effective” in preventing COVID.

While they claim the triple-dose regimen reduced COVID, 12 of the children actually caught COVID twice in the two-month follow-up, and 11 of them were vaccinated.

The confidence interval for Pfizer’s jab is -370% at the lower end of the 95%, which suggests children who get the jab are nearly four times more likely of getting sick with COVID than their unvaccinated peers.10

Unscientific and Unethical Behavior

As reported by The Defender:11

“Combining all ages together, Pfizer said its three-dose regimen for children 6 months to 5 years old was 80% effective at preventing illness from the Omicron variant based on preliminary data from its clinical trial.

The 80% number was calculated 30 days after the third dose. As noted by committee members, the efficacy number is likely to go down after 30 days and post-approval monitoring was suggested.

Moderna said its two-shot vaccine was about 51% effective against infection from Omicron in children under 2, and about 37% among kids 2 to 5 years old, citing different efficacy numbers than what was reported by the company in March.

In a March 23 press release, Moderna said its vaccine in the 6-month to 2-year age group was only 43.7% effective. In the older age group, the company said its vaccine was 37.5% effective. A top official at Moderna has already said a booster will be necessary.”

As noted by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, vaccinating infants and children who have no need for the shots and don’t benefit from them, just to “protect” adults, violates medical ethics. And since those who are jabbed still readily transmit the virus, the children are actually put at risk for no reason at all.

It’s All About Securing Indemnification

So, how can we explain the irrational behavior of the FDA and CDC? Why don’t any of the data matter? Why doesn’t the science matter? Why don’t any of the red flags matter? And why are they handing out EUAs when the criteria for EUA are satisfied? Products must satisfy four criteria in order to get EUA:

  1. There must be an emergency
  2. A vaccine must be at least 30% to 50% effective
  3. The known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product
  4. There can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines)

Unless all four criteria are met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained, yet here we are. COVID, by any reasonable measurement, is no longer an emergency, there are plenty of adequate alternative treatments, and the potential benefits in no way, shape or form outweigh the potential risks — especially not in infants and children under 5. That’s three out of four criteria that, clearly, are not met.

The short answer to the question, “Why are the CDC and FDA acting so irrationally?” is that both agencies are corrupt to the core and are no longer in the business of protecting public health. They are securing profits for the drug industry, and getting EUA for infants and young children is a crucial step toward securing permanent legal indemnity for the drugmakers.

As explained by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in the short video clip above, they need this last remaining age group to be included under the EUA, because once the emergency is finally declared “over,” the next phase of liability shielding requires that the shots receive approval by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

This is the group that decides which vaccines are to be added to the childhood vaccination schedule. Once the vaccine is on the childhood vaccination schedule, the vaccine makers are permanently shielded from liability for injuries and deaths that occur in ANY age group, including adults.

The only way to break that indemnity is by proving the vaccine maker knew about the safety issues and withheld that information. You can learn more about this indemnification process in “The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids.”

So, the end goal is permanent immunity against liability for injury and death from the COVID shots in all age groups, and to get there, they first need the EUA to cover all children. After that, the ACIP approval becomes more or less a matter of rubber stamping. This is why they’re playing Russian roulette with the health of infants and young children.

Murder Has No Statute of Limitation

That said, if fraud can be proven, all indemnity falls by the wayside, and there’s no statute of limitation when it comes to murder, which some insist is what’s happening here.

The video above features “To The Lifeboats” podcaster Sam Dodson’s comments to the FDA VRBPAC during its open public hearing session to approve the COVID jabs for children between the ages of 6 months and 5 years. In a rapid-fire manner, he reviews several data points that ought to have put a halt to these injections, but didn’t; several instances where the FDA knew harm was occurring from these shots, or would occur, and they did nothing.

Another public comment was submitted by an as-yet unidentified individual. The submitted comment was provided to and reposted on Coquin de Chien’s Substack. Here are some select pieces:12

“This comment is NOTICE of possible criminal liability to Lauren K. Roth and members of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee who owe duties of care, diligence, good faith, and loyalty in recommending ‘for’ or ‘against’ the EUA amendment for COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in children 6 months through 4 years of age.

Only two deaths are listed herein to establish knowledge. If the amendment is approved, it will have been done by committee members ‘knowing’ of felony crimes in context. Your investigation of these deaths should include death certificates, autopsy records, witness interviews, and immunization records.

Massachusetts Death Certificate 2022 SFN 5980 is a 7yo girl died January 18, 2022 listed as died from U071 ‘COVID-19,’ B49 ‘unspecified mycosis,’ J450 ‘predominantly allergic asthma,’ and R091 ‘pleurisy.’

VAERS_ID 2038120 is a 7yo girl in Massachusetts, who received her 2nd dose 1/13/2022 and was reported to VAERS 1/15/2022. PRIOR_VAX states, ‘Severe nausea and vomiting from 5 min post vaccination and for the next 8-10 hours.’

SYMPTOM_TEXT states, ‘Spiked a 103 fever, severe stomachache, has not had a bowel movement since the day before vaccination, which makes today 3 days without one. First vaccine caused severe nausea and vomiting from 5 minutes post injection and for the next 8-10 hours.’ This little girl suffered immeasurably 4 to 5 days as her intestines shut down due likely to impeded blood vessels servicing intestines.

Massachusetts Death Certificate 2021 SFN 56611 is a 48yo man died 11/16/2021 listed as died from U071 ‘COVID-19’ and E669 ‘OBESITY.’ SFN 56611 is known to have died less than 24 hours after inoculation.

In both cases, the Medical Examiners listed the cause of death as ‘COVID-19,’ when it was clearly not COVID-19. And in both cases, the Medical Examiners omitted listing causes Y590 ‘Viral vaccines’ and T881 ‘Other complications following immunization, not elsewhere classified,’ when these clearly were proximate and actual causes.

Death certificates from the state of Massachusetts are sent to the CDC, a federal entity. Thus, fraud on a state death certificate is a federal crime as it affects federal death records. Several federal felony crimes apply in this instance and are listed below.

If you dismiss this NOTICE and recommend the EUA amendment without first investigating these two deaths, you become liable for inchoate crimes and the felony crime of ‘misprision of felony.’ If a single person subsequently dies as a result of the amendment, all the elements will have been satisfied for you to face felony murder charges or involuntary manslaughter. Qualified immunity is not a valid defense …

There were found sixty likely C19 vaccine deaths in a 25-minute perusal of the 2021 and 2022 death certificates, which extrapolates to hundreds, probably thousands of C19 vaccine deaths in Massachusetts.

Refusal to investigate these fraudulent records is a crime that, because of the felony murder aspect, has no statute of limitations. Five, ten, or twenty years from now, if a federal prosecutor were to learn of this NOTICE, he or she would have significant evidence to bring charges for felony murder.

In summary, this NOTICE places you in a position requiring you to investigate these deaths prior to recommending the amendment. If you dismiss this NOTICE, you may be criminally liable for involuntary manslaughter, felony murder, and a list of federal crimes and inchoate crimes … Comment Tracking Number l4d-m52d-ge4m.”

Florida Bucks the Trend

My home state of Florida now stands out as the only U.S. state that is recommending AGAINST the COVID jab for 6-month-olds to 5-year-olds. Parents can still get their infants jabbed if they want, but the official state recommendation is not to do it, as there’s simply no scientific or logical rationale for doing so.

Florida also did not preorder any extra doses for this age group.13 In a June 18, 2022, Substack article, Dr. Robert Malone addressed the latest EUA authorization for infants and young children, and applauded Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ decision to buck the trend. It’s hard to believe he is the only governor in the U.S. who resisted this murderous threat to the children:14

“Have you looked at the VAERS data lately? The CDC apparently has not. In the USA alone, there have been 831,801 adverse events, of which 12,776 are life threatening. There have been 63,978 hospitalizations. There have been 13,293 deaths and 14,232 permanent disabilities from these vaccines.

True, these are ‘unverified’ — but previous research has shown that the VAERS system under-reported adverse events associated with vaccines, not over-reported … Then there are the international post-vaccine adverse event summaries.15

The CDC, under Freedom of Information Act Request (FOIA) has now admitted16 that even though they had promised to analyze the VAERS data before advising about these vaccines for children, they did not.

The VAERS data were NOT taken into consideration before the authorization of these genetic agents for babies and young children. Frankly, this is shocking. So shocking, it is hard for me to even write about it.

Now, approximately 430 children with other severe illnesses have died with COVID in the last 2.5 years (that would be 172 per year). Plus there have been 2,600 hospitalizations of children, most with underlying conditions — over that 2.5 year period. These numbers show that even before Omicron, in the case of children, COVID is less severe than flu …

Omicron in children is much less severe. We know this. The scientific evidence is clear. Yet the FDA goes back to data from the DELTA variant when discussing the effects of this virus … Governor DeSantis again has it right. It is time to stop. Parents must stop. The time is now to just say no.”

Last but not least, if you’re still unsure whether the COVID shot is the “right” choice for your child, please read through Dr. Byram Bridle’s “COVID-19 Vaccines and Children: A Scientist’s Guide for Parents,”17 published by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance. It goes through how the shots work, what the known side effects are, results from the clinical trial, the effects of the spike protein and much more.

••••

Sources and References:

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

US Federal Court Rules Death Caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 1)

US Federal Court Rules Death Caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 1)


US Federal Court Rules Death caused by Gardasil HPV Vaxx (Part 1)

By TLB Contributing Partner: Christina England, BA, Hons

This case is one of many from Shattered Dreams the HPV Vaccine Exposed.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) VigiAccess database, as of August,13, 2018, there had been a total of 84,986 reports of adverse reactions filed. These reports included 37,249 reports of nervous system disorders; 2514 cardiac disorders (including 35 cardiac arrests), 542 reports of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS); over 3000 reports of seizures or epilepsy; 8430 reports of syncope and 401 deaths. [1]

Sadly, Christina Tarsell is one of an ever-increasing number of individuals who died after receiving the HPV vaccine, Gardasil. This vaccine, according to the Mercury Project, was only an ‘experimental’ vaccination at the time, and by receiving the vaccine, Christina had unwittingly enrolled into a post-marketing long-term safety study.

In an article, written by James Lyons-Weiler, CEO, President of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge he stated:

The American public deserves to know whom and what killed Christina Tarsell—and they need to know the shoddy state of vaccine “science.” The scientists at Merck who hid the adverse events in the pre-licensure safety studies killed Christina Tarsell. The doctors who tell their patients they will be protected “against HPV” killed Christina Tarsell. The doctors who tell their patients that the HPV vaccine can “prevent cancer” killed Christina Tarsell. The media who take advertising revenue from Pharma and who are afraid to conduct bona fide investigative journalism and report on the realities of the combined myths and falsehoods about HPV vaccine safety and efficacy killed young Christina Tarsell at the tender age of 21 years.” [2]

We believe that they are correct and that all individuals should be made fully aware of any potential dangers that a vaccine may or may not have, before they agree to be vaccinated. Sadly, this did not happen when Christina was offered the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, in August 2007, by her gynaecologist, who, according to her mother, told them that, “the vaccine was safe and effective and would prevent Christina from getting cervical cancer.” Emily Tarsell, Christina’s mother, told us that:

Concurrently there were adds on TV promoting the vaccine with the slogan ‘One Less”’cancer victim. Neither the ads nor the doctor mentioned any possible adverse side effects or cautions.”

Emily believes that if she and her daughter had been told the truth about the HPV vaccination, her beautiful, intelligent daughter, would still be here today.

The Life and ‘Gardasil-Induced’ Death of 21-Year-Old Christina Tarsell

Christina, or “Chris,” as she preferred to be called, was born on November 8, 1986. She was born a strong and healthy little girl with an Apgar score of 9 out of 10 and weighed a healthy 7 pounds, 14 ounces.

According to her mother, her daughter was an easygoing baby who was always smiling, active, inquisitive and healthy and she fulfilled all of her developmental milestones.

As a toddler, Christina loved being told stories, playing with her Little People playsets, and building with Legos. Her mother told us that, in particular, she loved all things mobile, especially kiddie cars, merry-go-rounds and bikes.

With her Shirley Temple curls, dimples, bright blue eyes, sunny smile and cheerful disposition, Christina was certainly a child who was easy to fall in love with.

Her mother told us that:

Chris loved people. It still brings me great joy to remember how she would stand up in her crib in the morning and greet me with a huge smile when I entered the room. I have never felt more loved or more loving. When she was a toddler, she ran up to a little boy, a stranger, at a restaurant and gave him a big hug, much to his surprise and ours. She was a lifelong hugger.”

Growing up, Christina blossomed into a beautiful, bright, happy, healthy and outgoing young lady. She had many friends and enjoyed an active social life. She particularly loved sports and played soccer, basketball, tennis and baseball, which, according to Emily, was her daughter’s favorite sport. She told us that:

In middle school, she played as the only girl on a boy’s baseball team, usually playing short stop or third base. She was the only girl at Elrod Hendricks baseball camp and the only girl to get two blue ribbons in open competition with the boys for fielding and all-around champion.”

Christina’s sport accolades did not stop at middle school. According to her mother, at Hereford High School, she was not allowed to play on the boys’ team, so she played girls’ varsity softball with a team that became County Champions in 2002.

Her passion for sports did not stop at high school, either. In 2008, Christina was chosen to play on the college tennis team, which went on to win the Division III Championship.

Emily told us that, for twelve years, Christina had also been a keen member of the local Girl Scout Troop 589. She had taken part in a number of community projects, for which she was recognized with the Gold Award, the highest award in scouting.

Christina also belonged to the Towson Unitarian Universalist Church.  She participated in the Youth Group, where she believed her thoughts, feelings and emerging beliefs were supported.

 Her mother explained that

While nourished emotionally, intellectually and spiritually by these connections and relationships, Chris also liked literal nourishment. We are a family of foodies. Grandparents on both sides operated restaurants and had culinary expertise. From the time she was a toddler, Chris was in the kitchen with me cooking and baking. At age three, she loved stir-fry shrimp and vegetables and as she got older, she came up with her own recipes. Her culinary interests and skills led to a summer job as a prep chef at Chiapparellis’ Restaurant owned by relatives. To save money for college, she also worked at her Aunt Tommie’s insurance agency doing clerical work.”

She continued:

Chris had a mind of her own and independently researched colleges. She had a lot going for her with academic honors (NHS and NAHS), a high grade point average (GPA), good writing skills, award winning art work and a variety of extra-curricular activities besides sports, which included Debate Club, involvement with Amnesty International in defense of human rights, and art editor of Brillig, the school literary magazine. She chose Bard College for early decision and Bard chose her. I was worried about the cost of Bard which was beyond my means as a psychotherapist and I wanted her to consider a state honors college. But Chris persisted with her vision as was her nature and she was awarded a generous scholarship.”

At Bard, Christina’s subjects of choice were philosophy and art. Initially, her medium was painting on canvas, which, according to her mother, were exuberant with light, color and texture. However, for her senior thesis, she decided to embark on a challenging project combining painting and sculpture.

Emily told us that:

Love of visual beauty and expression in art and nature was something we shared throughout her life. Although I made a career change after her birth, I had been a practicing artist with an advanced art degree. When Chris was an infant, I had taped small reproductions of Matisse cutouts along the sides of her bassinet.  We had visited museums and galleries and even took a trip to Italy together. But the heart of her work was driven by nature, thoughtful contemplation and by an honest probing of what felt emotionally true.”

To demonstrate the sheer beauty of Christina’s amazing art work, her mother has allowed us to publish a few examples of her paintings created in high school. Links to an exhibition of her early and late art work and a piano quintet composed by Jonathan Leshnoff called Radiance in Memory of Christina Tarsell can be accessed at www.gardasil-and-unexplained-deaths.com.

Emily continued:

Chris was well-launched on her path to adulthood and I felt I could relax some and take a short vacation from parenting and work. But before I took that time, I made an appointment for Chris to have her first gynecological appointment and an appointment with a doctor for adults instead of her pediatrician. I had no idea how life-changing those appointments would become.”

She explained that, at the time, Christina had been undecided whether or not she should receive the series of three HPV vaccinations and she looked to her for guidance. Emily told us that:

After thinking about it and suppressing my instinct to wait, I decided that since the vaccine is said to be safe and will prevent cervical cancer, why not. So Chris got her first Gardasil vaccination just prior to returning to college for her junior year.”

Chris got the second shot of Gardasil when she came home for the Thanksgiving break in November 2007. The same day she saw the gynecologist, she also saw my primary care doctor to switch from a pediatrician to adult care. But something unexpected happened. During a baseline physical, the primary care doctor picked up a heart arrhythmia (an irregular heart beat) by EKG. This was totally surprising, since in her 20-year medical history, Chris had never had any arrhythmia. As an athlete, she had medical checkups about twice a year. Neither arrhythmia nor any other serious problem was ever detected. She had had strep throat in her youth, seasonal allergies and at around age 16, she had brief treatment for a couple of months for mild hypothyroidism. But that normalized and she was not taking any medication. So we were surprised by the finding of an arrhythmia. The doctor said that it could be a false positive and suggested that she be retested when she came home for the Christmas break from college.”

As directed, Christina had the second EKG during the Christmas holiday and once again, an arrhythmia was detected and therefore she was advised by her doctor to have an echocardiogram (ECG). Her mother explained that:

Back at college in February of 2008, Chris did get an echocardiogram. The results indicated that there were no structural problems with her heart. The doctor had no further recommendations for any follow up and we assumed that everything was OK. It was much later when we learned that she had been misdiagnosed as having premature atrial contractions (PAC) and was prescribed the wrong test. She was in fact having ventricular premature contractions (VPC) and she should have been put on a Holter monitor.”

Emily continued:

Thinking everything was OK, Chris moved forward with her semester. Chris’s Dad, Richard had visited her at Bard in April and things seemed to be normal. When Chris returned home at the end of May, she planned a short visit because she had a summer job pending on campus. I had finally taken that vacation and I was away when Chris arrived home but she picked me up at the airport four days later. At home, she was complaining to me about feeling dizzy when she stood up and she was feeling very tired. I thought that she was probably having post-semester fatigue. I did not know that three days earlier her Dad had taken her for her third Gardasil vaccination.”

Christina continued to feel tired and dizzy throughout her visit. She developed a rash and despite her mother wanting her to take an extra few weeks off to recover, Christina insisted on returning to college, to begin a new job working for the Hessel Museum of Art and to move off campus with her new housemates.

Believing that she would see her daughter in a couple of weeks, Emily told us:

“… I thought that when I visited with Chris, we could see a doctor if her symptoms persisted. So we packed up the used car that I had just given her. She gave me a big hug, promised to call me when she got back to Bard and she soldiered on.”

However, although Christina phoned as promised, Emily was unaware of the fact that she would never see her daughter alive again. Sadly, Christina died in her sleep on June 23, 2008, at the tender age of 21, just eighteen days after her third Gardasil vaccination.

Claim Filed in the US Court of Federal Claims for the Gardasil-Related Death of Christina Tarsell

Emily, like any parent who lost a child, desperately wanted to know what happened.

She waited anxiously for the coroner’s report. She explained that because of Christina’s two previous reports of arrhythmia, she had asked the coroner, Dr. Keri Reiber, to pay special attention to the heart. However, although Dr. Reiber had been committed to try and help Christina’s family find out why she had died, after an extensive investigation, she could find no structural problems with Christina’s heart or any other explanation for Christina’s death. While it was clear that she had suffered a cardiac arrest, Dr. Reiber could not explain what had happened and therefore she had to report the cause of death as undetermined.

However, as part of Christina’s medical history, Dr. Reiber noted that she had recently received the HPV vaccination. Emily told us that:

Since the vaccine was newly licensed, there were no known tests to see if the vaccination was causally related to Chris’s death, but Dr. Reiber did file a VAERS report.”

The autopsy report left the family with more questions than answers. Emily told us that:

The possibility that Gardasil may have caused Chris’s death had not occurred to me, until Richard told me about a news report concerning a suspected Gardasil-related death.”

Emily began to investigate the vaccine on the Internet. She told us that her investigations not only enabled her to network with other families but also contact scientists.

This led Emily to not only speak with her doctor, but also to file a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) report and contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

She told us that she believed that the government would contact her and carry out a thorough investigation. However, she was shocked when she heard nothing from them.

Emily told us that:

The CDC did obtain Chris’s medical records and a year after her death, the CDC did one test to rule out Staphylococcus aureus. It was negative. That was the end of their investigation.”

However, she was astounded by what appeared to be the CDC’s indifference to a reported death and continued with her research, and over time, she became convinced that the Gardasil vaccination had been responsible for the death of her daughter, but she needed proof.

It was for this reason that Emily and her family decided to hire attorney Mark Sadaka of Sadaka Associates to file a claim with The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.  This organization, often referred to as the “vaccine court,” was set up in 1988 as part of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. The Act gave legal immunity to pharmaceutical companies for injuries and deaths due to vaccines. [3]

Stay Tuned for Part 2

••••

References:

  1. World Health Organisation (WHO) VigiAccess database. Accessed August 13, 2018. Available here

  2. Lyons-Weller, James. Who and What Killed Christina Tarsell # NotOneMore. Mercury Project. 2018. Available Here

  3. Human Resources and Services Administration. National Injury Compensation Progam, Official Website. Available Here

••••

Read more articles by Christina England

••••

Note from Christina:

Arlo was rescued from Romania when he was just six months old, after being born with deformed front legs and dumped outside a railway station.

I have been fostering him for the past year and after a massive fundraising effort, have raised enough money to have surgery to straighten his left leg and fuse his wrist.

This surgery was performed last week and was a great success. However, this has left him lopsided and he now needs similar surgery on his right leg.

Please donate anything that you can to help this darling little boy to stand tall and walk on all four legs for the first time. Thank you.

Please consider donating through my fundraiser, where you can see more of his story.

Or through my PayPal christina128@live.co.uk

Thank you.

••••

About the Author: Christina England, BA Hons, Research Journalist and Author

Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. She left school to work in a children’s library, specialising in storytelling and book buying. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980.

After taking an A Level in Psychology and a BTEC in Learning Support, Ms. England spent many years researching vaccines and adverse reactions. She gained a Higher National Diploma in Journalism and Media Studies in 2010 and in 2016 she gained a BA Hons degree in Literature and Humanities. She currently writes for VacTruth, Health Impact News, GreenMedInfo, The Liberty Beacon, Vaccine Impact and Medical Kidnap on immunisation safety and efficacy.

She has co-authored the book – Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis – Are Parents Being Falsely Accused? with Dr. Harold Buttram and Vaccination Policy and the UK Government: The Untold Truth with Lucija Tomljenovic PhD, which are sold on Amazon. She also compiled the book Shattered Dreams: The HPV Vaccine Exposed

Her website is Parents and Carers Against Medical Injustice

••••

Click on image below to visit site:

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Share this…
Share on FacebookPin on PinterestTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Source

UNJABBED

UNJABBED

world orders review – June 25th, 2022

================
(world orders review)
================
UNJABBED 💉 (@Avidor)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JRB1XlaYI1Jy/ [SHARE]
================
@ https://www.bitchute.com/channel/tangentopolis/

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

Monkeypox: Was COVID Just a Test Run? (Dr. David Martin Interview)

Monkeypox: Was COVID Just a Test Run? (Dr. David Martin Interview)

Man in America Published May 25, 2022

LIVE AT 10:30AM ET: Just as COVID starts to die out, a brand new public health threat emerges: Monkeypox! But luckily, Bill Gates and the W.H.O. already have it all planned out! Join me for a live interview with Dr. David Martin to discuss the latest global health scare, and what to expect next.

Today’s show is brought to you by RiseTV, where it’s our mission to awaken, uplift, and unite America—one show at a time. Get your free trial of RiseTV: https://bit.ly/3jLYL6x

Follow Man in America on Telegram: https://t.me/maninamerica

To learn about investing in gold visit http://goldwithseth.com, or call 877-646-5347.

Save up to 66% at https://MyPillow.com using Promo Code MAN

FOLLOW, WATCH, & LISTEN:
Website: https://maninamerica.com/
Telegram: https://t.me/maninamerica
PodBean: https://maninamerica.podbean.com/
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/ManInAmerica
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/maninamerica
Gab: https://gab.com/ManInAmerica
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ManInAmerica
Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/maninamerica
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ManInAmericaUS
Parler: https://parler.com/user/ManInAmerica
SafeChat: https://safechat.com/channel/2776713240786468864
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6SBszdk1BlQ5jMltclgYiy

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

error

Please help truthPeep spread the word :)