Senators Speak Out Against “Impending” WHO Global Pandemic Treaty

Senators Speak Out Against “Impending” WHO Global Pandemic Treaty

A controversial move within the WHO to consolidate and expand its global pandemic management powers has been slammed by several prominent Australian Legislators. The proposals under scrutiny are the so-called “Global Pandemic Treaty” and certain related Biden Administration amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005. They would, in the words of one senator, “give the WHO the power to act in a pandemic without the cooperation of individual states”.

Recent comments by Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese have stoked concerns that the government will sign a pact that would outsource Australia’s pandemic response management.

In recent posts and interviews, Hon. Malcolm Roberts (Senator, One Nation), Hon. Alex Antic (Senator, Liberal Party), Hon. Gerard Rennick (Senator, Liberal National Party) and former Liberal National MP and current One Nation Senate Candidate George Christenson have all come out in strong opposition to the World Health Organisation’s controversial so-called “Global Pandemic Treaty”.

Their concerns revolve around the ability of Australian governments to determine their own responses to health pandemics while safeguarding the liberties and rights of their citizens.

Both Pauline Hanson’s One Nation and George Christenson have started online petitions demanding that Australian delegates to the World Health Assembly vote against the proposals. One Nation’s petition has received over 50,000 signatures.

Senator Malcolm Roberts also spoke about the Global Pandemic Treaty on George Christenson’s popular podcast, Conservative One.

Alex Antic, a Liberal Senator for South Australia, has written a strong letter to the Foreign Minister expressing concerns about the Amendments and the Global Pandemic Treaty. In it, he condemned any ‘draconian measures’ that would ‘restrain the constitutional authority of the Commonwealth and deprive Australian citizens of their right to medical autonomy’.

Antic finished the letter:

“the Australian people must not be subjected to the whims of WHO bureaucrats, and it is imperative that the Australian Government vote against the Amendments and resist the Global Pandemic Treaty.”

He posted the full text of his letter on Facebook:

“I write to register my concerns regarding the amendments proposed by the Biden Administration to the International Health Regulations 2005 (“the Amendments”) and the impending “Global Pandemic Treaty”.

I understand that the governing body of the WHO, the World Health Assembly will meet in Geneva later this month and, among other matters, that body will discuss the adoption of the Amendments by member states including Australia.

In broad terms, the Amendments seek to give the WHO the power to act in a pandemic without the cooperation of individual nation-states.

I am concerned that if adopted, these Amendments will shift much of this decision-making power away from Australian decision-makers, directly to the WHO and create a one-size-fits-all approach to disease management in this country.

Moreover, I note that on 1 December 2021 the World Health Assembly resolved to establish an ‘intergovernmental negotiating body’ to draft a new ‘WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response’, the so-called Global Pandemic Treaty.

I am greatly concerned that the Global Pandemic Treaty will include even more draconian measures than those contained in the Amendments which will restrain the constitutional authority of the Commonwealth and deprive Australian citizens of their right to medical autonomy.

The Amendments and the Global Pandemic Treaty threaten our sovereignty by allowing the WHO to declare pandemics, impose lockdowns, and enforce treatments against the will of the Australian people.

One must also factor into account the historical failures from the WHO leadership in recent pandemics including a failed response to both the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics.

Any mechanism which overrules governments and hands supranational powers to unelected bureaucrats is completely unacceptable. The WHO cannot be allowed to control the world’s health agenda.

In my respectful view, the Australian people must not be subjected to the whims of WHO bureaucrats, and it is imperative that the Australian Government vote against the Amendments and resist the Global Pandemic Treaty.”

The criticism comes just days out from a Federal Election in which so-called “freedom-friendly” minor parties may play a significant role. Nevertheless, neither Antic, Rennick or Roberts is up for re-election in Saturday’s Federal Election.

As we head to the polls, Christians have perhaps more information available than ever before to help them make an informed and godly decision with their votes.

Here are just a few of them:

  1. Christian Values Checklist (a rating and ranking of the main parties)
  2. Australian Christian Lobby — Survey (a survey of individual candidates, although many have not responded)
  3. FamilyVoice Australia (a summary of the main parties and party leaders)
  4. The Catholic Weekly — Election Guide (a summary of the positions of some of the main parties)
  5. Vote Wisely — How to Vote Cards (a how-to-vote guide for below-the-line and above-the-line senate voting)

Please compare and cross-reference the resources linked above. Don’t rely on one resource for all your research.

Whatever the result of Saturday’s election, Christians can continue to pray for our political leaders (1 Timothy 2:1-3).


Photo by Anna Shvets.

Thank the Source

New Christian Values Checklist – Miraculous Shift to Christian Policy for Minor Party

New Christian Values Checklist – Miraculous Shift to Christian Policy for Minor Party

We are excited to announce a miraculous shift in the Christian Values Checklist towards righteousness. In our 23 years of our existence, the Australian Christian Values Institute has never seen anything like it. Totally extraordinary.

The Australian Federation Party has produced an ethics vision statement that has forced our team to release a new Second Edition. They have all green ticks, which means they overtake One Nation federally as the political party with the most Christian values embedded in public policy.

The Australia Federation Party has been in existence since 2004 under various names. In 2020, it became the Australian Federation Party.

The two leading figures in the party are Christians, who because of the inspiration of the Christian Values Checklist have courageously spelt out their values on their website for all to see. This now puts pressure on all the other political parties to do the same. This is a miracle. Thank you for your prayers.

There have been some minor adjustments to Liberal Democrats, Labor and the United Australia Party. We have moved United Australia Party on the two LIFE questions, from a red cross X? to straight red ? which signifies a conscience vote on LIFE issues. Research has come to light that Mr Clive Palmer is adamantly pro-life. Our prayer is that he will be bold enough to make a stand for the unborn babies of Australia.

Our goal has been to do a careful bipartisan evaluation of the major party’s positions on matters relating to Christian values and present it in a readable, impartial and accurate form to help Australian voters make an informed choice when voting.

Please find the new versions of the Christian Values Checklist as digital links below. We have a broad Christian Values Checklist for all of Australia and one specific for WA.

Christian Values Checklist 2022

  1. Federal Christian Values Checklist PDF
  2. Federal Christian Values Checklist Jpeg
  3. WA Christian Values Checklist PDF
  4. WA Christian Values Checklist Jpeg

WA checklist 2022

Positions are often difficult to summarise in a format of this kind, and parties have not always made definitive statements. We use colour coding and a combination of ticks, crosses and question marks to rate the various positions of the parties rated on the checklist.

Therefore a ‘?’ indicates in some instances a conscience vote, or a less than conclusive opinion on the party’s position on some of the issues. A Gray Box with a question is an unknown position. A tick in a Green Box equals YES and X in a Red Box equals NO.

Sadly, we have lost the Christian Democratic Party and the Democratic Labour Party to deregistration. Thankfully, Australian Christians are still running in Western Australia and holding the lamp of Christian values high for everyone to see.

Currently, One Nation with its new National Pro-LIFE Policy was number one. Now it is number two followed by the Liberal Democrats at three.

We encourage you to vote for any Pro-Life candidates in either the Senate or the House of Reps in any party, whether Labor, National, Liberal, Minor or independent.

Right now, our nation needs a miracle. So we ask you to join together with Christian leaders and churches of all denominations from all over Australia as we Pray and Fast for 21 days up to and including the Federal Election, Saturday 21 May 2022.

Our prayer is found in Isaiah 9:6, “That the Government shall be upon his shoulders.” Register to receive Daily Devotions here.

There are many good candidates in all the political parties, so please do your own research. Check out the great how to vote resources at ACL with a question survey for every candidate in Australia. Family Voice has an excellent analysis of the major parties.

Another very good Informed Voters Election Guide 2022 has been put together by the Catholic church in Sydney.

We need to support those candidates who have faith, no matter what party they find themselves in as best we can. The checklist has its limitations. It is about the parties, as opposed to the individual candidates.

Martyn Iles has done an excellent video endeavouring to list all the Christian Candidates in Australia standing. It is not comprehensive, but a very good attempt.

Sharon Cousins has put together a how-to-vote in the Senate. It is not without error, but a very good attempt. It is a mammoth job, and she is to be congratulated.

Remember, use all these resources as a guide only. Do your own research. You always must make your own decision. Your vote is your vote.

It is our belief the Christian Values Checklist will enable people with strong Christian convictions to make an informed decision about how best to direct their vote in the Federal Election.


Photo by Manny Becerra on Unsplash.

Thank the Source

Doctors want Victorians to wear muzzles again

Doctors want Victorians to wear muzzles again

XYZ | By David Hiscox – May 17, 2022

Trust me, I’m a doctor.

Have you noticed when you’re out and about that aside from Asians and elderly Boomers, the only people who wear masks are White women who would otherwise be nominally pretty?

My theory is that they understand at least subconsciously that so-called “liberation” is a con which requires them to be sexually available anywhere and everywhere. It’s why in the 2010’s they were obsessed with refugees.

The Islamic dress code offered them the protection which the modern church now refuses to provide. White women may become less enthusiastic about Islam now that Covid restrictions give them the excuse to cover their faces.

As an added bonus, they get to keep their clitoris.

Note the gravity with which the reportress uses the term “settings”. Apparently, a supermarket is a “setting”. The masses are being conditioned to use bureaucratic language for every…. setting:

The Australian Medical Association says Victorians should voluntarily don masks at the supermarket, indoor theatres and anywhere else where there is a high chance of spreading winter viruses.

Conditions in the state’s hospitals have been deteriorating worryingly in recent weeks. Wards are full and ambulance ramping is widespread. Doctors have declared emergency departments to be dangerous, and epidemiologists expect the pressure on the health system to worsen as the temperature drops, with a further surge in COVID-19 cases and a growing flu season.

The president of the Victorian branch of the Australian Medical Association, Dr Roderick McRae, said the doctors group would be supportive of a move to reinstate some “moderate, but sensible [COVID-19] requirements” such as masks in supermarkets, theatres, concert halls and football stadiums.

But with such a decision politically fraught and not expected in the short-term, McRae instead called on people to take their own precautions for the good of the community, including avoiding mass events and getting a third vaccine.

The Andrews government is getting slammed because the hospital system, and in particular the ambulance system, is at breaking point. Given that Dictator Dan is secretly fronting up to corruption hearings every other week, he doesn’t need Victorians remembering that he was elected on the back of unrealistic promises to the Ambulance Union.

He’d love to lock us all down again but he can’t, because it’s an election year. Victorians hate Covid restrictions only slightly more than they hate Daniel Andrews himself. He narrowly avoided a revolution last year, and if he is to have any chance of retaining electoral support in the suburbs and the regions he must keep Victoria open.

It’s quite fun to watch him squirm. With the option of brutal dictatorship temporarily shelved, he’s been reduced to begging.

Read more

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

Still confused about how voting works? Here’s a simple run-down

Australia’s preferential voting system can be incredibly confusing. Consequently, many voters have a very limited understanding of how the process works… and political parties and lobbyists capitalise on this. Here’s a quick explainer to help you maximise your vote this Saturday

If you’d prefer to watch a video summary of the following content, here’s an 8-minute overview:

Levels of Government (State vs Federal):

Australia is a Federation, meaning we have multiple independent levels of government — state and federal being the most important. Each state has its own government and parliament (based in each state’s capital city), and Australia as a nation has its own central government and parliament, based in Canberra.

As most people would be aware by now, this election is a Federal Election – we are electing a new Prime Minister and a new federal parliament.

The Federal Parliament has two chambers: an upper house (or the Senate) and a lower house (or the House of Representatives).

The House of Representatives — The House of Government

The House of Representatives is where the Prime Minister sits. Whoever controls the House forms government — and the leader of that party becomes the Prime Minister.

There are 151 seats in the House of Representatives. Each seat corresponds with a portion of land called an electorate. The voters in each electorate have the power to elect a local politician to represent their electorate in the House of Representatives.

You can find out which electorate you are in by using the Australian Electoral Commission’s website.

Candidates stand in each electorate, each trying to convince voters that they are the best one to represent the electorate in parliament.

Voting in the House of Representatives (Green Ballot Paper)

When you go to vote, you will receive a green ballot paper with a short list of names on it.

On this paper, you must number each and every box, with #1 being the candidate you support the most strongly.

The order in which you number the boxes is called your “preference”, and your preferences do matter.

Here’s how.

Counting the Vote for Your Electorate

When the counters begin counting the votes, they count all the #1 votes (or the “primary vote”) in the electorate. This is called the first “round” of counting.

If one candidate receives over 50 per cent of the primary (#1) vote, they win the seat automatically.

However, if no candidate receives 50 per cent of the primary vote, we move to a second “round” of counting. The counters eliminate the candidate with the least number of #1 votes. You might protest that this is not fair, but this is actually where preferences become important.

Although the candidate has been eliminated, the votes are still in play.

The counters take the ballot papers for the eliminated candidate and look at which box each voter numbered second. The counters then reassign the votes to whomever the voters preferenced second, adjusting the count accordingly.

This process of eliminating the candidate with the least number of votes during each round of counting and redistributing their votes according to their next preference continues until one party or candidate has received over 50 per cent of the overall vote.

As a result, just because a person receives a high number of #1 votes does not mean that they will necessarily win the seat. It really depends on how the “preferences flow” – or on how people number the boxes on their ballot paper. A candidate with a low number of #1 votes could ultimately be the “preferred” candidate in that electorate.

This is why your preferences are so important.

If you found this explanation difficult to follow, you can check out my video, where I visualise the process with simple animations. Click here to check it out.

In each electorate around the country, this process continues until each electorate has an elected representative. Whichever party has a majority of seats in the House of Representatives gets to form government.

The Senate — The States’ House

The Senate is not involved in forming government. It is a state’s house or a house of review, and is mainly responsible for keeping an eye on the House of Representatives and representing each state equally in parliament.

There are 76 seats in the Senate: 12 for each state. However, there are only 6 positions going up for election in each state.

This is because senators serve for a term of 6 years as opposed to 3 years (like members of the House), so half of them go up for election on a staggered basis every 3 years: 6 from each state, or 38 in total.

Senate Voting

When you go to vote, you will receive a huge white paper alongside your small green paper. The white ballot paper is for the senate.

You have two options here: you can vote above the thick black line or below that same line.

  • Above-the-line voting is for parties. When you vote for a party, you essentially give them your vote and let them decide who in the party it helps to elect.

If you vote above the line, you must number at least 6 boxes.

  • Below-the-line voting gives you a far greater level of control over who you vote for. It lets you designate the exact candidate that you want to support — giving your vote straight to them, rather than to a party.

If you vote below the line, however, you must number at least 12 boxes.

The more boxes that you number, the greater chance your vote will have of being effective, so it is important that you do your research and find as many good candidates or parties to support as possible.

Counting the Senate Votes for Your State

In some ways, senate counting is similar to counting for the House (as we’ve seen above). However, instead of over 50% of the vote being required to get elected, a far smaller percentage is needed. This is because there are 6 spots available per state for the senate, whereas your local electorate had just 1 position available.

This smaller percentage required to get elected is called a “quota”. The best way to visualise a quota is to think of it as a bucket.

As the primary (#1) votes are counted, they begin to fill up the buckets. Each party than manages to fill up a bucket wins a seat. Remember, there are 6 seats up for grabs.

Once no single party has enough primary votes to fill up a quota, the elimination begins.

Just as they did in the House of Representatives count, the counters eliminate the candidate/party with the least number of votes.

But the votes themselves are not eliminated. Instead, they are reassigned to another candidate/party according to the order in which the voters numbered their ballot paper. That new party then gets a boost in votes, hopefully helping to keep them in the race for a senate seat.

This is why numbering lots of boxes is important. The fewer boxes you number, the more likely that the counters will pick up your ballot paper to check who you preferenced next, only to realise that they have counted all of your numbered boxes. There are no preferences left to count.

When this happens, your vote will be “exhausted”. At this point, it won’t count for anything; it won’t support any party — it’s gone.

Significantly, the final senate quota doesn’t even need to be filled. The last seat just goes to the party that has more preferences than anyone else.

This is why it’s important to number all of the candidates or parties that you would like (or wouldn’t mind) seeing in parliament. By doing this, you can boost their numbers and give them a better shot at winning the last senate place.


So, that is how the process works. It’s not straightforward, but once you understand the underlying principle of preferences as directing your vote to different parties, then hopefully the rest makes more sense.

Hopefully, you found this article (and the video) useful. Please remember to pray and vote wisely this coming Saturday!

To recap:

  1. On the green ballot paper, number all the boxes in order of your favourite (1) to least favourite
  2. The counters will follow your preferences when the process of eliminating candidates begins, ensuring that your vote stays in play the whole time
  3. On the large white ballot paper, number at least 6 boxes above the line and at least 12 below the line (in each case, number as many as you can)
  4. The more boxes you number, the lower the chance of your vote being wasted

Helpful Resources

Please compare and cross-reference the resources linked above. Don’t rely on one resource for all your research.


Photo by Edmond Dantès.

Thank the Source

Retired Cop Andrew MacGregor Compares Port Arthur and Sandy Hook

Retired Cop Andrew MacGregor Compares Port Arthur and Sandy Hook

(L) Port Arthur prison, from the convict days, Photo: (R) Sandy Hook school, Photo: Port Arthur prison, from the convict days, Photo: (R) Sandy Hook school, Photo:

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

I am the author of a book about the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre, and coauthor of a book about the 1996 Port Arthur Massacre. Until today I was unaware that anyone had compared the two massacres. By pleasant surprise I find that my friend Andrew MacGregor of Victoria, Australia, wrote such a piece in 2014 and it has been hiding on an Internet website entitled

A very helpful fact is that MacGregor was a policeman in Australia from 1968-1985, a senior constable. He therefore can spot a deviation from police protocol on, say, picking up spent cartridges, or messaging on police radio.

It will be my task here to pick out, from Andrew’s 14,000-word essay, just the bits that show similarities between the 1996 and 2012 events. (He covers mush else, which you can see at Hercolano.)  MacGregor thinks the two events are not just similar but are in fact connected — he attributes this to the apparent gun-control agenda behind both.

My article here will be divided into Part One: Similarities, and Part Two: Gun-control Agenda. MacGregor gives the abbreviations “SHEM” for Sandy Hook Elementary Massacre, and “PAM” for Port Arthur Massacre; I will follow his usages. At the end I will mention the recent settlement made in the lawsuit Soto v Bushmaster.

Part One: Similarities between PAM and SHEM

  1. PAM had a lone gunman — I mean the official story says there was a lone gunman — age 28, of low IQ and with little shooting experience. Name: Martin Bryant. He has been in prison in the state of Tasmania for the last 26 years. SHEM had a lone gunman, age 20, of whom it is said, with no proof, that he liked guns and his mother took him to the shooting range for sport. Name: Adam Lanza. There will be no trial, as Lanza reportedly killed himself at the site.
  2. The PAM shootings took place in a cafe and caused the death of about 20 adults (plus more later, outdoors). There were several injured survivors. At SHEM, 20 first-graders and 6 adults were shot dead and one adult survived, Ms Natalie Hammond. Again, I mean that’s the official story. Andrew and I both think the Sandy Hook school was empty, and no one got shot.
  3. Good heavens, I just noticed a similarity that Andrew omitted. Both gunmen conducted a murder, in a private house, before going on the big shooting spree. Bryant killed the two owners of a B&B against whom he had allegedly been holding a grudge for many years. Lanza murdered his mother in her bed. No reason.
  4. Legislation was passed before the event that seems to anticipate it. The state of Tasmania wrote a new Coroner’s Act in February 1996 (the massacre was April 28, 1996). The state of Cinnecticut passed legislation that had been introduced on February 23, 2012 (the massacre was December 14, 2012). It called for letting ” the parents of a child who was a homicide victim to request that the autopsy report not be publicly disclosed.”
  5. This one is a dissimilarity rather than a similarity. At PAM, it took more than four hours for police to show up, despite the urgent calls having been made. At SHEM, the police arrived in 46 seconds. (And no, the police station is not on the same street as the school.) Actually, there is a similarity to PAM if we look at the morning after the shooting. Bryant was in a cottage that went on fire. The firemen, for no reason at all, had arrived 30 minutes before the flames could be seen.
  6. Re PAM, The Royal Hobart Hospital was required to update and finalize their ‘Emergency Procedures’ called Code brown. This was accomplished on the 26th April 1996, two days prior to the massacre. In Connecticut, various ambulance services were at the ready, but these were for a drill that was occurring on the same day as SHEM, in fact at the same hour, after 9am at Carmel Elementary.
  7. At PAM, the local authorities of the tourist site, in which the cafe is situated, were away on a seminar at some distance. And this was a Sunday! On the day of SHEM (a Friday) many men from agencies such as Emergency Management, Homeland Security, State Response Framework, CEO/EMD Disaster Preparedness, were on duty, but it was for the drill at Carmel.
  8. At PAM, “the shooting inside the Broad Arrow Cafe was reported by several witnesses to have taken in excess of 5 minutes, with the gunman using three weapons, an AR-15, an AR-10 and a Daewoo automatic shotgun. However, once it was discovered that six people had died due to the fire-exit-door being nailed shut prior to the massacre, the authorities reduced the time to 90 seconds, reduced the firearms used to only the AR-15, and then reduced the number of shots fired to 29.”

At SHEM, there were several alterations of the original reports. The first reports stated that it was the two pistols that were the murder weapons, but there were no spent .223 cartridges in either classroom, or in the hallway or at the shattered glass ‘Security’ door. It was not until 3:54pm that the media report a ‘third’ weapon found

  1. At PAM, it was difficult to find the weapons used by “Bryant,” because they all burned in the cottage fire. At SHEM, all could see from a news helicopter video that a gunman locked a rifle in the trunk of a car.” For Lanza to have finalised his shooting, then deposited the Bushmaster in the trunk of Mom’s car, and return to the school to commit suicide with a Glock handgun, there was not enough time. It is impossible because there was no police radio communications device reportedly found on Adam Lanza’s body.”
  2. I am adding this one for American readers who know nothing of the Port Arthur affair. Martin Bryant was accused of holding a man hostage in the Seascape Cottage. To give verisimilitude to an otherwise unlikely story, a police negotiator made phone calls into Seascape to ask the gunman what he wanted. Bryant replied that he wanted to escape by helicopter to Adelaide. Although we Australians took it all as Gospel when it happened, we were later treated to another fake hostage scene, in December 2014. A man named Monis, in the Lindt Cafe in Sydney, demanded an ISIS (Muslim) flag but did not bother to ask for escape. At the Coroner’s inquiry, it was reported that the police negotiating team was trying to deal with Monis all day but that simply is not true. They did not deal with him, as they knew the whole thing was play-acting. (No similar story for Sandy Hook; the whole town was in in the fakery.)

Part Two: The Gun Control Agenda

My book about Sandy Hook is called “Unreality: Sandy Hook Messes Minds.” I theorize that the main purpose of the fictitious massacre was to drive us all crazy by seeing our governments tell manifest lies. Still, after Sandy Hook and after Port Arthur, there was immediate action to restrict gun usage. (The same happened in Scotland after the very real Dunblane School massacre.)

I will now quote directly from Andrew MacGregor’s 2014 essay, found at The boldings are Andrew’s. The prime minister of Australia at the time, John Howard, who had just come into office, ordered a gun buyback.  Farmers and others could, and did, turn in their guns at a rather nice compensatory price.

The rest if this article was opined by Andrew McGregor, ex-cop. It refers to the Aurora shooting as well as Sandy Hook:

What the United States of America is experiencing at this present moment [2014] in the endeavors by the Federal government, to infringe upon the American Constitution, specifically the 2nd Amendment to that Constitution, is exactly the same attack that Australians suffered under the attacks led by the American Rebecca Peters of the National Coalition for Gun Control, leading up to the Port Arthur Massacre on the 28th April 1996.

Prelude:      “On the 14th of October 2009, the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and the State Department, announced that it was instigating with the United Nations, an ‘Arms Trade Treaty’.   The Obama Administration in 2009 was prepared to have the 2nd Amendment ‘regulated’ by a body outside of the ‘American Constitution’.

This was a “Political Agenda”!  To infringe upon the Constitutional rights of every American citizen, the Obama Administration needed a catalyst, an event that would create the required mindset amongst the minions.  Once the Obama Administration had created that catalyst, then the ‘Treaty’ with the United Nations could go ahead.

The United Nations conference on the Arms Trade Treaty started on the 2nd of July 2012 and was due to be completed on the 25th of July 2012.  It is during this time that the catalyst would be required.

On Friday the 20th of July, just a week before the UN conference was due to end there was a “lone-nut” gun massacre at the Aurora theatre where patrons were watching the ‘Premiere’ of the film, ‘The Dark Knight Rises’.  Twelve people were killed and 58 wounded.  Police arrest a ‘suspect’, James Holmes.

This was the first part of the catalyst, but things had gone badly wrong.  The main weapon used in this massacre was an AR-15 with a 100-round magazine, but the magazine jammed.  This reduced the number of victims and reduced the overall required effect of the massacre.  Furthermore, the supposed ‘lone-nut’ gunman who was supposed to have been ‘suicided’ remained alive.

When police arrested James Holmes he was seated in his car totally out of it in a drugged state and completely harmless.  There is absolutely no way that James Holmes could have been considered in a condition to have committed the crimes he was later charged with.

There were also trails of blood and other evidence which instead of leading to Holmes’ motor car actually went past it and in another direction.  And finally there were the witnesses who stated that the ‘fire exit’ door to the theatre was opened by a person inside the theatre whose mobile phone rang, and this door was left open for the gunman to enter.  Ergo, we have at least two people other than the supposed ‘lone-nut’ gunman, James Holmes involved in this massacre.

The United Nations conference on the ‘Arms Trade Treaty’ was unable to be finalised and the conference was adjourned to March 2013.

The Trial of James Holmes was instigated so that it would also take place in March 2013, but the Obama Administration still required the second part of the  ‘catalyst’ to create the ‘proper’ atmosphere for their infringement on the American Constitution.  That ‘catalyst’ took place on the 14th of December 2012 at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut.

Other Sources

Note: That is the end of the quote from Andrew MacGregor, but I will include now some items that he got from other sources in case you wish to pursue this:

Senator Dianne Feinstein announces that she intends to introduce legislation reauthorizing a federal assault weapons ban originally passed in the early 1990s during the Clinton administration that was allowed to lapse in 2004. John Rudolf and Janet Ross, “School Shooter Adam Lanza Used Military-Style Bushmaster Rifle,” Huffington Post, December 16, 2012.

US Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency and State of Connecticut Division of Emergency Services and Public Protection conduct  Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Training Course at Sandy Hook Fire Department. The training consists of “instructor-led course presentations” in addition to “small group activities, videos, and group discussions.” According to the description, “the course also provides overviews of HSEEP-related initiatives such as technology (e.g., the HSEEP Toolkit) and capabilities-based planning (e.g., Target Capabilities List [TCL]).

Two witnesses in Sandy Hook school shooting are unidentified adults. “There are two adults that were injured in the facility—in the school—and suffered gunshot wounds and are recovering,” Connecticut State Police Lieutenant J. Paul Vance stated. “Our investigators will in fact speak with them when it’s medically appropriate, and certainly they will shed a great deal of light on the facts and circumstances of this tragic investigation that we’re undertaking.” [Vance’s emphasis] “Key Witnesses in Connecticut School Shooting are Survivors,” Hartford Courant, December 17, 2012.

A spokeswoman for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is uncertain whether Nancy Lanza brought her son to the range or whether he ever fired a weapon there. Allaine Griffith, “After Divorce, Lanzas Had Joint Custody of Adam,” Hartford Courant, December 17, 2012.

Philip Alpers from the Australian ‘National Coalition for Gun Control to speak to American Vice President on gun Control.

On December 26, 2012, Connecticut State Attorney General Stephen Sedensky files court plea to postpone release of contents yielded through five search warrants. Sedensky argues that unsealing such findings might “seriously jeopardize” the investigation by divulging evidence heretofore known only to other “potential suspects.”Sandy Hook DA Cites ‘Potential Suspects,’ Fears Witness Safety,” Digital Journal, February 5, 2013.

Newtown city officials convene community to float proposal of demolishing Sandy Hook Elementary School. “Newtown First Selectwoman E. Patricia Llodra said that in addition to the community meetings, the town is planning private gatherings with the victims’ families to talk about the school’s future. She said the aim is to finalize a plan by March.” “Newtown Weighs Fate of Sandy Hook Elementary School Building,” Associated Press/New York Post, January 13, 2013.

One more point Andrew noted: In America today, the ‘gun’ issue is to be considered a ‘Health’ issue, just the same as it was in Australia back in the 1990’s.


Brief Thoughts on Politics to Help Christians Avoid Cynicism

Brief Thoughts on Politics to Help Christians Avoid Cynicism

Amid the scrum of earthly politics, let us keep our eyes fixed on Heaven, remembering that although governments are important, they are not the ultimate solution to all our problems. Let us be thankful for our democracy, though it may entail a messy process; and extend mercy to our fellow Australians who may disagree with us on what is best for the common good.

On Saturday, May 21st, Australians will be voting for their next Federal Government.

Political parties are in full campaign mode, and our media is saturated with politics. But many Aussies are cynical, including many Christians. Do any of the major parties represent our views? Are they going to do what they promise? Will the people and party we vote for, get elected?

It can be somewhat demoralising.

And so, here are 13 thoughts that will help you keep perspective, no matter who the Prime Minister is from May 22nd:

1) No matter who resides at the Lodge, Jesus will still be at God’s right hand

Christ Jesus will still be Lord no matter who the next PM is. Yes, we should be concerned and engaged with politics, but we need not fear or despair.

‘All authority in heaven and earth has been given to Me…
and I am with you to the end of the age’. (Matthew 28:18,20)

2) We’re citizens of a kingdom that cannot be shaken

We’re dual citizens: citizens of Australia, yes, but ultimately citizens of another Kingdom:

‘But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like His glorious body by the power that enables Him even to subject all things to Himself.’ (Philippians 3:20-21)

And with a (guaranteed) future like that, we need never lose hope.

3) Remember how much we can be thankful for here in Australia

It’s tempting to focus on the shortfalls of Australian politics and Australia as a whole.

But let’s take a step back and remember the many things — the many blessings — for which we can be thankful. Such as Freedom. Peace. And economic prosperity.

Let’s be thankful.

4) Everybody does religion when it comes to politics

A common secularist trope is that religion has no place in politics, so Christians should stay out of it.

But it’s impossible to keep religion — formal or informal — out of politics. Firstly, all of our laws are undergirded by a view of morality. And morality is driven by beliefs of one kind or another. Just take abortion: the pro-choice side believes that unborn babies are not human persons. Can they prove that by reason or science alone?

No, it’s a belief that drives their morality and thus their

Let’s remember that the next time you hear that Christians shouldn’t bring their beliefs into the public square.

5) Politics is (usually) downstream of culture

Politics often reflects culture.

And so, a culture in which we’re not allowed to disagree with ‘woke’ views about gender or sexuality will soon have laws that penalise those who hold to the Christian worldview.

Cue: the ‘anti-gay-conversion laws‘ in Victoria. (Coming to all other Australian states near you).

6) Remember that government is not God, and can only do so much

The average Aussie no longer looks to God for help in our post-Christian world.

They look to earthly sources, including the government. Government is meant to be that strength and refuge, an ever-present help in trouble. But although the government is critical to a functioning society (Romans 13:1-6), it can only do so much.

This is probably why so many secular Aussies are demoralised about politics: it’s not delivering their (sky-high) expectations.

7) When we ask the government to intervene more in our lives, it gladly does so

If we see our government as our Saviour, we’ll call for more significant government intervention (protection) in our lives.

Governments will gladly intervene, whether it be protection from speech we don’t like or religious beliefs that we find offensive. But the more governments intervene, the less freedom we’ll have: that’s the zero-sum equation of government intervention.

And while governments are good at intervening, they’re not as adept at getting out of people’s lives.

8) Remember the times we live in: this is a fallen world, not the new creation

If your average secular Aussie no longer believes in heaven outside this world, they’ll look for heaven within this world.

Thus, they’ll expect more from the government: they’ll expect it to deliver nothing less than a promised utopia (and many politicians are only too happy to pander to this desire).

But in a fallen world, there can be no heaven until Jesus returns. And this should temper any hope or expectation of utopia now.

9) Know the difference between ‘straight line’ and ‘jagged line’ political issues

The Bible does speak to some political issues directly, e.g. murder. There is a ‘straight line’ from Biblical text to a particular policy.

However, the Bible doesn’t speak to every issue. Yes, it has principles that apply to nearly all political issues, but there are very few ‘thus saith the Lord’ positions that all Christians must hold.

Thus, Christians will come to their own conclusions on these ‘jagged line’ issues and must have the freedom to do so.

Don’t bind the conscience of fellow believers on issues the Bible doesn’t (see Romans 14).

10) Be generous toward those who disagree (especially over ‘jagged line’ issues)

We live in an age of outrage, where we’re quick to become angry at those who disagree with our political views.

But this is not how Jesus would have us live. While He didn’t say much about most of the political issues we care about, he did say a lot about how we treat others, especially those we disagree with (e.g., Lk 6:27-31).

Treating others this way matters more than winning political arguments or even elections.

11) Know that democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others

Democracy is messy.

Yes, we might all get a say, but we don’t all get our way. But when compared to other systems people have had to live under, it is much better.

And so, let’s not be hasty in writing it off or wishing for another system.

12) Understand the difference between what feels good and what does good

There’s a big difference between a policy that sounds and feels good and a policy that does good.

Just look at communism: it sounds fantastic. ‘From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs’.  What sounds fairer, more compassionate than that? Except it’s a disaster whenever it’s been tried (without exception).

Capitalism, on the other hand, doesn’t sound as good.

The free market doesn’t care about everyone’s needs being met: it only cares about results. It sounds less than compassionate.

But as an advocate for the global poor and U2 singer Bono grudgingly accepted, free markets are crucial for lifting billions out of poverty. The results speak for themselves.

As you think about politics, know the difference between what feels good versus what does good.

13) The perfect is often the enemy of the good

Let’s face it: if politics is the art of compromise, few, if any, parties will deliver precisely the things we want.

We’ll never have the perfect party. We’ll never have the perfect politician. We’ll never have perfect policies.

But despite this shortfall, much good can still be done in an imperfect world. Unborn babies can be saved. Human trafficking can be stopped. Slavery can be abolished. And many of the poor can be fed.

Even in our imperfect and broken world. 

Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

Thank the Source

Honest Government Ad | 2022 Election

Honest Government Ad | 2022 Election

thejuicemedia – May 1, 2022

The Australien Government has made a final ad before the 2022 federal election and it’s surprisingly honest and informative.

Ways you can support us to keep making videos:

Become a Patron:

Tip us on PayPal:

Other options:

SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation

The Great Social Implosion

The Great Social Implosion

thecrowhouse – May 14th, 2022
Discord :
TheCrowhouse Banned YouTube Archive on AltCensored:

The Crowhouse Community Forums:

Contributions and donations can now only be received via Wise bank.
If you would like to assist please visit this page:



Monero: 87myJVoX3H4Pfd3hDp2wujHeB6K7VdFYF2zJJmoqGv8yE55mQDJdg3ySqnmwBXdZLrhJyydykgs2khmckmJNadaeHY3CrYQ
Pirate Chain: zs1f7jvqcntcplpfnva2lw7spwzr0xa5x7wczneg0v2epl78quqnt9ggudrk02yyzp8t4zy7pmflat
Bitcoin Cash:

Samsung 6G Forum

woman had a “medical episode” while driving

U2’s Bono performs concert in Kyiv metro

Confidential NSW government report reveals plan to introduce distance-based tolls

Sudden Death ☠️ Go on, there is nothing to see here … Meanwhile, unfortunately, completely normal!

Foot-and-mouth disease detected in Indonesia; Australian livestock sector on alert

41.5K people died within 21 days of Covid-19 Vaccination in England & a further 291K died within 6 months

Australia’s new surveillance laws can now modify social media posts

Weatherwar101 Website
Weatherwar101 YouTube

Commonwealth of Australia States Assembly

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn – 200 Years Together pdf:

“History is a pack of lies about events that never happened, told by people that weren’t there.” – George Santayana.

“The illusion of freedom will continue for as long as it’s profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will take down the scenery, move the tables and chairs out of the way, then they will pull back the curtains and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater.” – Frank Zappa

“The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became the truth.” – George Orwell

“There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life.” ― Frank Zappa

“Their stupidity does not amaze me, its when they’re smart that amazes me. It’s baffling whenever you find someone who’s smart — incredible. Soon you’ll have zoos for such things.” ― Frank Zappa

“A single person who stops lying can bring down a tyranny” Alexandr Solzhenitsyn



SourceSouth Australian Gov Criminal Organisation


Please help truthPeep spread the word :)