AAPS Supports Courts’ Authority over a Hospital that Denies Patients’ Access to a Common Treatment

AAPS Supports Courts’ Authority over a Hospital that Denies Patients’ Access to a Common Treatment

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) has filed an amicus brief with the Wisconsin Supreme Court to urge it to reverse a 2-1 appellate decision that cut off judicial review when a hospital denies potentially life-saving treatment to a hospitalized patient. AAPS asks the Wisconsin Supreme Court to reestablish the authority of courts to order a hospital to stop interfering with a widely used, FDA-approved treatment for a hospitalized patient.

In Gahl v. Aurora Health Care, a 2-1 panel of a Wisconsin appellate court ruled for the hospital as it denied a patient access to ivermectin for treating COVID-19, while the patient was deteriorating under the hospital’s protocol. The appellate court reversed the circuit court even though it had heard persuasive evidence from two physicians, one of whom is an expert on ivermectin.

The circuit court ordered the hospital to allow the patient to receive the treatment of his choice as prescribed by a physician he selected. But the appellate court reversed that pro-patient decision and granted the hospital carte blanche to deny medication sought by a hospitalized patient, without judicial intervention for the patient.

In its amicus brief, AAPS argued to the Wisconsin Supreme Court that hospitals are not authorized to practice medicine, and neither are the FDA and other entities that have been interfering with access to ivermectin throughout the COVID pandemic. Courts should not allow hospitals to interfere with the judgment of practicing physicians and the wishes of hospitalized patients to obtain safe medication that is widely available to those outside of a hospital.

“If a hospital can properly deny care to confined patients with safe, approved medications, then such a hospital should disclose that on the front door of its entrance to all before they enter,” wrote AAPS General Counsel Andrew Schlafly in this amicus brief. “Hospitals should not become unaccountable islands of tyranny, wielding unchecked power to withhold or deny care,” he added.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a national organization representing physicians in all specialties since 1943. Its motto is omnia pro aegroto (everything for the patient).


COVID-19: Do you have enough life insurance?

COVID-19: Do you have enough life insurance?

If you have dependents, you need to protect them in case you die suddenly. Life insurance is the method used by most. Sudden, unexpected death of a breadwinner is not new, but the constant stream of hazards in the news should focus your attention.

Many scare stories turn out to be hype—especially those based on computer modeling (and serving an agenda). But the graph below shows actual occurrences. Sudden Adult Death Syndrome is real.


The source is the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV), which insures 72 million lives. Remember that if actuaries, in contrast to public health authorities, make a mistake, they and the companies they work for face consequences—including bankruptcy.

Just after the rollout of COVID-19 injections, there was a sharp, unprecedented spike in unexpected deaths, a 1,000% increase. The KBV denies a causal relationship to vaccination. The cause for the deaths is unknown, but it is not COVID-19. Authorities have not yet done appropriate studies to investigate a possible vaccine connection. Mainstream media did not attend a press event where data analyst Tom Lausen presented the figures, which he calls a “risk signal.”

From CDC data, equity investment advisor Edward Dowd calculates that Millennials, age 25 to 40, experienced an 84% excess mortality in the fall of 2021, coinciding with vaccine mandates and boosters—a Vietnam War-size event.

When it comes to New Year’s resolutions, number 1 should be providing as best you can for your family’s future, and carefully examining the risks you might be taking.


Physicians Ask: Are Blood Clots after COVID Vaccine an Ignored Crisis?

Despite official reassurances that adverse effects of COVID vaccines are rare or mild, patients still have concerns and social media is filled with reports. In the winter issue of the of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Jane Orient, M.D., examines the mechanisms of blood clotting and the evidence for an effect of vaccines.

Experts tend to dismiss the risk of blood clots by claiming the risk is greater from the disease, Dr. Orient writes, but patients are not convinced.

Finding the objective truth is difficult because of the enormous power asymmetry between government-approved experts and scientists who challenge the official view, she explains.

The California bill AB2098, passed into law because of lobbying by the “misinformation busters,” restricts free speech of physicians by penalizing them for dissemination of information about COVID-19 that officialdom deems false. This is “just the tip of the iceberg of repressions and harassments that the dissenting physicians or scientists can face daily while having no means of recourse,” Dr. Orient states.

Her article explores the mechanism by which the vaccines—including the mRNA vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna as well as the J&J shot—could disrupt the complex blood clotting system, plus a scrutiny of scientific studies and data that manufacturers submitted to regulators. It also considers the “anecdotal” data from physicians, patients, and morticians.

The conclusion is that the safety signal “is sufficiently strong to provide impetus for further studies of [clotting] phenomena and also for warning the public about those perils of COVID-19 vaccinations.”

The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons is published by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), a national organization representing physicians in all specialties since 1943.

Read Full Article: https://www.jpands.org/vol27no4/orient.pdf


Physicians Can Fight Back against Sham Peer Review

Physicians who suffer irreparable harm to professional reputation and career as a result of unfair, bad-faith peer review have little recourse, writes Lawrence Huntoon, M.D., Ph.D., in the winter issue of the of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

Litigation is a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome, he writes. Given the strong immunity provided by the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (HCQIA) and State laws, perpetrators of sham peer review may have good reason to believe they will never be held accountable for their wrongful actions in a court of law.

“There is, however, another option for fighting back—filing complaints with professional boards against the perpetrators of sham peer review for professional misconduct.”

It is professional misconduct, Dr. Huntoon writes, to knowingly bring false/fabricated charges against a physician; to knowingly violate medical staff bylaws that are intended to provide due process/fundamental fairness to the accused physician, to leak confidential peer review information outside of peer review committees so as to harm or disparage the accused physician, or to make standard-of-care decisions outside the scope of the peer reviewer’s training and expertise.

Physicians who participate in sham peer review have no immunity against having to explain their actions to a medical board, and if found culpable, being sanctioned accordingly. A medical licensure board is required to process all complaints it receives.

Administrators who participate in sham peer review and who belong to the American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) can be reported to ACHE to assess whether they have violated the organization’s code of ethics.

“When licensed physicians or members of ACHE violate professional codes of conduct, they must be held accountable in the interest of just accountability and for the health and well-being of patients,” Dr. Huntoon concludes.

The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons is published by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), a national organization representing physicians in all specialties since 1943.

Read Article in Journal: https://www.jpands.org/vol27no4/huntoon.pdf


Medical Board’s ‘Anti-disinformation’ Attack Described in Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons

Advocacy groups have launched a nationwide campaign promoting delicensure of doctors who allegedly disseminate mis- or disinformation related to the COVID pandemic, states the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). A family physician, Steven LaTulippe, M.D., explains how this affected him, in the winter issue of the of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

Dr. LaTulippe reports that he had successfully treated some 75 patients who probably had COVID before the disease was recognized, using his standard anti-viral protocol. He also states that he was probably the only doctor in the county who did not close his office during the pandemic. His new Twitter account quickly attracted 30,000 followers eager for COVID information. But it was censored, he notes.

Because of an anonymous complaint, the Oregon Medical Board opened an investigation of his practice in August 2020. Very quickly after he unexpectedly spoke at a political rally in November, “the OMB medical director sent me a threatening letter advising me that I ‘may be in direct and active violation of current Governor Executive Orders,’” Dr LaTulippe writes.

As a result of OMB’s “emergency” suspension, then revocation of his medical license after 22 years of unblemished practice, Dr. LaTulippe writes, he lost his clinic, his home, his reputation, and his ability to earn a livelihood. Thousands of patients suddenly lost their physician. Half of them were being treated for pain and addiction, and many suffered greatly from losing their source of treatment. His staff was devastated.

Dr. LaTulippe states that the medical boards’ administrative law system constitutes the “quintessential kangaroo court.”

“State medical boards are so powerful that almost all physicians are terrorized into silence and submission.”

“The evidence that OMB conveniently ignores is that no actual complaint was ever filed against me by any of my patients, and that I never caused any harm to even a single patient.”

Dr. LaTulippe’s story shows the urgent need to constrain the licensure boards’ abuse of power and to restore medical freedom, states AAPS.

The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons is published by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), a national organization representing physicians in all specialties since 1943.

Read Article in JPandS: https://www.jpands.org/vol27no4/latulippe.pdf


COVID-19 vaccine: Should I worry about visual symptoms?

COVID-19 vaccine: Should I worry about visual symptoms?

If you listen to the radio, you will be hearing ads about boosters or updated COVID vaccines. But unlike with drug ads, there is no long list of rare side effects, or advice to “call your doctor if….”

One rare side effect of COVID vaccines is blindness or loss of vision. This could result from damage to the artery that supplies the eyeball, or from damage to the optic nerve, somewhat like what is seen in the optic neuritis that may occur in multiple sclerosis (MS). The graphic illustrates the process in Guillain Barré syndrome, an autoimmune disease that damages other nerves (also rarely associated with vaccines as well as with viral diseases).

Animation of nerve damage in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Credit: Doctor JanaWikiMedia Commons. To support Dr. Jana visit his Patreon.

You definitely need to call your doctor immediately (and be examined) if you develop blurred vision, blind spots, visual field cuts, or sudden loss of vision. Prompt treatment with steroids may save your vision.

We do not know whether repeated injections increase the risk, or whether doctors will consider a transient episode a contraindication to future doses.

For further information:

Blinded by COVID Vaccination” by Peter McCullough, M.D.


Is C60 And EDTA Safe? Clinical Review

Is C60 And EDTA Safe? Clinical Review

by Dr. Ariyana Love (ND)

There are some drugs being promoted by independent media and fringe Medical Doctors that are quite dangerous. The two drugs in question are C60 and EDTA. We are going to look at the clinical research that has been done to determine if these drugs are truly safe and effective treatments for COVID poisoning and if there’s a better solution.

Given what Pharma is doing to humanity now, I cannot comprehend why anybody would continuing trusting pharmaceutical drugs. Adding toxicity to poisoning is totally the wrong treatment! When poisoned, you must detox a person and then support their immune system with antioxidants and super nutrients so their body can recover and biological damage can be reversed. Pharma drugs leave a person totally exhausted and the immune system drained. Without supporting the immune system, you are not giving an effective treatment protocol.

Dr. Zev Zelenko was a perfect example of medical ingenuity using the allopathic system. He knew to prescribe drugs for his patients that effectively kill parasites, like Ivermectin but he didn’t stop there. Dr. Zelenko also provided immune support and detox supplementation, like his Z-Stack and Z-Detox. This is what Pharma educated MD’s largely fail to do. You can order from Dr. Zelenko’s website, here.

C60 is being promoted by lawyer Todd Calender as a treatment for jab injured persons and by Independent Journalist Sarah Westall, who is promoting C60 and frequency treatment for vaxx detox. These are completely wrong treatments. I have many testimonials from jab injured clients who became severely worse weeks after any kind of frequency treatment. This is because frequency activates the self-replication of the magnetic nanotechnology, as explained in the toxicology report entitled, “Toxicology of chemically modified graphene-based materials for medical application”.


EDTA and C60 are cytotoxic and neurotoxic poisons. C60 is being used now as a CHEMO drug and as a Pharma treatment for HIV. It contains metallic nanoparticles that can cross the Blood Brain Barrier (BBB). Metallic nanoparticles are toxic to living cells. Studies show that C60 also induces cancer growth. Isn’t it diabolical how Pharma always uses drugs that induce cancer when “treating” cancer?

Fullerene C60 is being marketed as a nutritional supplement when in fact C60 is an industrial lubricant. This study shows that C60 induces chronic nephrotoxicity. Mice who were injected with C60 had macroscopic lesions of the kidney(s) and this study showed that C60 failed to prolong the life span of mice. So why the hell are people using it?

C60 damages your DNA as another study shows.

“A large-scale association study for nanoparticle C60 uncovers mechanisms of nanotoxicity disrupting the native conformations of DNA/RNA C60 enables to disrupt the structure of G-quadruplex DNA, and thereby provides a possibility to activate the telomerase by facilitating its access to telomeres and in this way promotes the proliferation of tumor cells.”

Another study reveals that fullerene C60 accumulates in the body following repeated exposure and therefore increases the concern for a potential to induce detrimental health effects in the long-term. If the body cannot process the metallic nanoparticles and eliminate them then you are essentially poisoning yourself.

What’s most disturbing is that C60 has a resonant mode shape in the Terra Hz band. This would make it an ideal body control medium through phase array that can be focused on an individual or group for targeted activation. Terahertz antennas can excite the C60 nano molecules at their resonant frequency and cause the cell they are near or in to burst.


EDTA is another dangerous pharmacopeia drug that Ana Maria Mihalcea (MD) is promoting as a heavy metal chelator.

EDTA has been found to be both cytotoxic and genotoxic in laboratory animals.

“The binding of divalent and trivalent cations by EDTA can cause mineral deficiencies, which seem to be responsible for all of the known pharmacological and toxicological effects. Sensitivity to the toxic effects of EDTA is, at least in part, related to the deficiency of zinc.”

EDTA was also determined to be an environmental hazard. It’s toxic and inhibits cellular division and chlorophyll synthesis.

Lastly I wish to point out how animals were severely harmed in the testing of EDTA and C60.


There are plenty of natural medicines that will effectively detox your body of heavy metals. Nature is always more superior to synthetic, chemical drugs because they work with our body and empower our bodies to heal and restore to balance. Sea salt is the greatest chelator of all and it’s all natural without any toxic side effects.

For example, redox molecules are isolated from sea salt and redox molecules repair damaged DNA. They chelate or remove toxic metals, increasing natural endogenous production of antioxidants, enhancing protection from free radicals and promote apoptosis (death of cancerous or mutated cells). There’s plenty of research demonstrating how redox molecules effectively chelate metals so there’s never a need to use dangerous, toxic drugs such as EDTA. Redox molecules also increase endogenous glutathione by 800%.

You can read more about redox molecules here and you can order redox molecules here.

Ph Miracle Products Prime Ph supplement is a natural sodium chlorite solution that’s also derived from sea salt. It is a powerful oxidant that’s activated by our stomach acids. It chelates the body of toxic metals and binds to the bad acids through our stomach, easily expelling them from the body. Order Prime Ph here.

Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake, Orgeon, is another natural heavy metal chelator. Blue Green Algae is the most nutrient dense food known to man, far superior to Spirulina. Blue Green Algae increases adult stem cell production and does targeted cellular repair. Read more and order here.

Borax is another effective heavy metal chelator. This natural salt derivative is a powerful treatment for autoimmune disease, reduces inflammation and treats chronic pain. Make sure you use a natural source.

Young Living’s Pine needle oil is far superior than Ivermectin at destroying parasites, especially when you combine it ideally with lemon peel oil and clove, sage, oregano or geranium. Order Young Living Essential Oils here.


COVID-19 vaccine: Should I worry about my child’s heart?

COVID-19 vaccine: Should I worry about my child’s heart?

Now that the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is recommending COVID vaccination for children, it may soon be added to shots required for school attendance. And there will be lots of advertising. This figure is something you won’t see in the ads:

The FDA asked for prospective studies of myocarditis, with blood tests, ECG, and cardiac imaging before injections and at timepoints afterwards to detect the real rate of heart damage and to ascertain how much of the problem could be asymptomatic and potentially present a future risk of sudden death in an unsuspecting patient. Pfizer and Moderna were not forthcoming, writes the world’s most widely published cardiologist, Peter McCullough, M.D., M.P.H. Thus, he turned to a study done in Thailand. He writes: that if the Mansanguan study is confirmed, a million young Americans could have sustained heart damage from COVID-19 vaccination, and some of them will be at risk for cardiac arrest and future heart failure…. These data suggest we should not be surprised by rising rates of sudden death in young persons with sports and during daily life including sleep.”

Others downplay the risk. For example, Shin Jie Yong, who writes for medium.com, “aiming to improve scientific literacy in this age of information overload and mis/disinformation,” states that he was appalled when he read the analysis published by the Florida Department of Health and its advice to avoid the COVID mRNA vaccine in men aged 18–39. He critiques a number of studies, but not Mansanguan et al. He concludes that “thankfully, myocarditis is rare” and that “myocarditis from mRNA vaccines is also readily recoverable.” Young men might want to avoid the Moderna product, but he still thinks that it is “still likely to bring more benefits than harm.”

        This much is clear:

  • The risk of heart inflammation is acknowledged.
  • The degree of risk is not precisely known.
  • Each person must weigh the benefit of a lower risk of severe COVID, at least for a few months, vs. the chance of permanent heart damage or even sudden death.
  • Unlike with an illness following drinking water at Camp Lejeune or taking Zantac, there is virtually no likelihood of financial compensation for COVID vaccine adverse effects.

        If you opt to take the shot, you may want to have diagnostic tests “just in case,” because early treatment including exercise restriction could be lifesaving.

        Whether you take the shot or not, be aware of the desirability of early treatment for COVID.

        Further information:



Please help truthPeep spread the word :)