Patrisse Khan-Cullors, one of the co-founders of the Black Lives Matter movement and a “trained Marxist,” is reported to have bought four homes over the past several years, as her activist profile grew and protests raged around the country.
Last week, real estate website Dirt.com reported that the “37-year-old social justice visionary” Khan-Cullors had bought a $1.4 million compound in Topanga, a remote Los Angeles neighborhood nestled deep in the Santa Monica mountains.
In L.A. terms, $1.4 million is not necessarily extravagant, though the activist took criticism for spending what would be a fortune in most other real estate markets, and for buying in a largely white neighborhood after urging people to “buy black.”
However, it turns out that Khan-Cullors also owns a house in the predominantly black neighborhood of Inglewood — among several other homes. The New York Postreported Saturday that she bought a $510,000 home there in 2016, which is worth about $800,000 today. She also bought a $590,000 home in South Los Angeles that is worth $720,000 today, and bought a ranch in rural Georgia for $415,000 last year, “featuring a private airplane hangar with a studio apartment above it.”
The Post added that Khan-Cullors and spouse Janaya Khan “also eyed property in the Bahamas at an ultra-exclusive resort where Justin Timberlake and Tiger Woods both have homes” called the Albany last year, with the price not disclosed.
Khan-Cullors declared in 2015 that she and the other Black Lives Matter co-founders were “trained Marxists” who are ” super-versed” on “ideological theories.” Last year, as Breitbart News noted, the radical activist signed a content production deal with Warner Bros. Television Group.
The news of Khan-Cullors’s real estate purchases prompted some activists called for a financial investigation of the Black Lives Matter movement. Khan-Cullors is hardly the first to cash in. Tamika Mallory, notorious for her support of the antisemite Louis Farrakhan, has scored product endorsements.
Nor would Khan-Cullors be the first Marxist to succeed in the real estate market with multiple homes. In 2014, Breitbart News reported on local landlords in Santa Monica, California, who are avowed supporters of the Castro regime in Cuba.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. His recent book, RED NOVEMBER, tells the story of the 2020 Democratic presidential primary from a conservative perspective. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.
China’s top disease control official admitted Sunday the country’s domestic coronavirus vaccines have low effectiveness and the Communist government is considering how to give them a boost.
Chinese vaccines “don’t have very high protection rates,” said the director of the China Centers for Disease Control, Gao Fu, at a conference in the southwestern city of Chengdu, AP reports.
Beijing has distributed hundreds of millions of doses in other countries while at the same time trying to seed doubt about competing Western products.
In May 2020, China’s president, Xi Jinping, even told the World Health Assembly its coronavirus vaccines were “a global public good”, and their distribution would be part of Xi’s vision of a “shared future for the people of the world to work as one”.
Beijing’s efforts to vaccinate its own people while exporting vaccines have drawn support abroad before the full medical outcomes have become known.
CNN’s Fareed Zakaria says Communist China has “essentially vanquished the virus without a vaccine” and has “come out of this pandemic in many ways stronger” and “is moving forward with much greater confidence in the world.” https://t.co/9yQZxvCMs0
Now questions are being asked about China’s program and the ability of its products to do what they promise.
“It’s now under formal consideration whether we should use different vaccines from different technical lines for the immunization process,” Gao said.
The effectiveness rate of a coronavirus vaccine from Sinovac, a Chinese developer, at preventing symptomatic infections has been found to be as low as 50.4 percent by researchers in Brazil. By comparison, the vaccine made by Pfizer has been found to be 97 percent effective.
No foreign vaccines are approved for use in China, where the coronavirus emerged in late 2019 in the city of Wuhan.
Gao gave no details of possible changes in strategy but mentioned mRNA, a previously experimental technique used by Western vaccine developers while China’s drug makers used traditional technology.
A study claimed that the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine cuts transmission of the Chinese coronavirus by over two-thirds. https://t.co/ESEJDlzLsx
“Everyone should consider the benefits mRNA vaccines can bring for humanity,” Gao said. “We must follow it carefully and not ignore it just because we already have several types of vaccines already.”
Experts say mixing vaccines, or sequential immunization, might boost effectiveness rates.
Trials around the world are looking at mixing of vaccines or giving a booster shot after a longer time period. Researchers in Britain are studying a possible combination of Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines.
Sunday’s admission by Beijing is not the first time its has been called up on unsubstantiated claims for its coronavirus vaccines.
As Breitbart News reported, the Sinovac vaccine candidate, “CoronaVac,” was found to be just 50.38 percent effective against the Chinese coronavirus in late-stage trials as recently as last January.
The Sinovac vaccine has already been sold to at least 10 other countries and is being administered to people in at least five other countries.
In China, the shot was given emergency approval last July, allowing people such as medical workers and employees of state-owned firms to receive it.
On Tuesday 13 April Christine Holgate will speak publicly for the first time, at a hearing of the Senate inquiry into her removal. For a reminder of what is at stake, watch this short clip of Christine Holgate in 2018 announcing the banking deal with CBA that saved community post offices, jobs, and the regional communities that rely on post offices for banking services. Without this deal…
About Editor, cairnsnews
One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen’s nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no ‘government’ of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.
Hunter Biden owes massive credit card debt after living like a high roller with access to millions of dollars linked to business dealings overseas that proved insufficient to satisfy his ravenous appetite for drugs, prostitutes, and luxury cars, the Daily Mail reported Friday.
The Daily Mail published a bombshell report surrounding the potentially incriminating contents of a laptop purportedly owned by Hunter that was dropped off at a Delaware repair shop and eventually given to the FBI.
On Friday, the Daily Mail unveiled contents of the laptop that go well beyond the emails first reported by theNew York Post in October 2020 detailing Hunter’s lucrative overseas business deals that helped him lead a drug-addled lifestyle, with prostitutes, and luxurious rides.
Ultimately, his lifestyle left him broke, unable to support his drug and prostitute habit and support his family.
The Daily Mail summarized its long bombshell report, noting:
Hunter Biden’s wild spending left him with huge debts to credit card companies and desperate to avoid jail for unpaid taxes, DailyMail.com can reveal
Pictures, documents, emails and texts obtained by DailyMail.com from Hunter’s laptop reveal he spent thousands of dollars on strippers and prostitutes
Biden even threatened to take $20,000 out of his daughter’s education savings account
Pictures found on the laptop show what appears to be thousands of dollars worth of crack bagged up on a scale, and Hunter naked and in bed with women
The numerous expenses left him strapped for cash when it came to supporting his new family
In an April 2017 email, [Hunter’s company] Rosemont Seneca Vice President wrote to Hunter detailing how he faced total bills of $476,231.60, including $60,467 on three credit cards and $320,417.85 in unpaid federal taxes
In 2019, the FBI seized the laptop in connection to a money-laundering scheme. Last December, Hunter and his then-president-elect father admitted that the U.S. Attorney in Delaware was investigating the younger Biden over his federal taxes.
Hunter reportedly made between $50,000 and $100,000 monthly working for corruption-linked Ukrainian gas conglomerate Burisma between 2014 and 2019, helping him fill his coffers with at least $6,070,150 from 2013 to 2016, the Daily Mail found.
Nevertheless, the news outlet noted, “Leaked emails reveal how Hunter Biden was desperate to avoid jail for unpaid taxes – after blowing hundreds of thousands of dollars on luxury cars, prostitutes, drugs, and designer clothing.”
According to the documents obtained by the Daily Mail, Hunter kept a 2014 Porsche, an Audi, a 2018 Ford Raptor Truck, an $80,000 boat, a Range Rover, Land Rover, BMW, and Chevrolet Truck.
He also spent thousands of dollars on strippers – including one who had his child – suspected prostitutes, and massive amounts of crack.
Hunter told an Arkansas judge he could not pay child support for the child he fathered with stripper Lunden Roberts, even as he rented a $12,000 per month home in Hollywood and was driving a Porsche Panamera at the time.
Ultimately, he settled the case with Roberts out of court after the judge ordered him to produce his financial records.
The Daily Mail noted:
The bombshell cache of 103,000 text messages, 154,000 emails, more than 2,000 photos, and dozens of videos from Hunter’s laptop and authenticated by experts retained by DailyMail.com are packed with revelations conveniently missing from his newly published memoir, Beautiful Things.
The pictures, documents, emails, and texts reveal that despite reporting more than $6 million of income from 2013 to 2016, Hunter’s bacchanalian expenses left him with huge debts to credit card companies and the tax man.
Some of the pictures show Hunter half nude, with only a bathrobe on like the late Hugh Hefner from the Playboy mansion, only instead of a cigar, Hunter is reportedly shown smoking what appears to be a crack pipe.
Other pictures found on his laptop show what appears to be thousands of dollars worth of crack on a Cheech and Chong branded scale and Hunter naked and in bed with likely prostitutes.
Like most drug addicts, Hunter sunk low, threatening to take money from his daughter’s education savings account.
The walls began to close in as his business dealings, described as shady by critics, came under the microscope of conservative media outlets such as Breitbart News. At the same time, the Democrat-allied mainstream outlets ignored Hunter’s overseas deals.
Although his money situation reportedly appeared to substantially improve in 2020, allowing him to pay the District of Columbia a $453,890 tax bill just six days after it was issued, that did not last long.
Hunter was unable to keep his high roller lifestyle and support his family on over a half a million dollar a year salary, and he had to borrow money from one of his companies to keep himself solvent, Eric Schwerin, the president of Hunter’s company Rosemont Seneca, reportedly wrote in an email in January 2017,
“As his finances descended into disarray and his assistants begged him to pay his mounting bills, the President’s son lashed out threatening to cut staff pay, take money from his daughter’s educational savings, and complained about his alimony bills,” the Daily Mail noted, adding:
In October 2018 email from Hunter’s accountant shows that by that year his tax debt had ballooned to an eye-watering $804,000, including $600,000 in personal taxes and $204,000 for one of his businesses that received money from Ukrainian gas company Burisma.
It appears Hunter is not the only Biden with a distorted version of reality.
In the few public comments Joe has made recently amid the fall to rock bottom by his son, his then-president-elect father blamed other people for his son’s downfall.
When announcing the feds were investigating Hunter for failing to pay taxes, Biden said last December he is “deeply proud of his son who has fought through difficult challenges, including personal attacks of recent months, only to emerge stronger.”
In an effort to keep the Daily Open Thread a little more open topic we are going to start a new daily thread for “Presidential Politics”. Please use this thread to post anything relating to the JoeBama Administration and Presidency.
“This is no small thing, to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption. I have studied history for years and I cannot recall it ever happening. It may be that our task is impossible. Yet, if we do not try then how will we know it can’t be done? And if we do not try, it most certainly won’t be done. The Founders’ Republic, and the larger war for western civilization, will be lost.”
“But I tell you this: We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us in the writing of it.”
Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy Name. Thy kingdom come. THY WILL BE DONE, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but DELIVER US FROM EVIL.
For Thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory, forever and ever. Amen †
Who was present at the Port Arthur massacre – Ned Kelly or Martin Bryant?
Introduction by Mary W Maxwell
This is an unusual article by Mal Hughes who often writes succinct comments (as “Aussiemal”) at GumshoeNews.com. He has learned, from chatting with millennials – people born after 1990 – that their generation has not been told a lot of our history. Mal is a serious local historian, having published in 2018 a history of Kwinana where he grew up, south of Perth.
Mal is no doubt the citizen who has done the most to get government attention to the unfair treatment of Martin Bryan. He has stacks of correspondence to “anyone he could think of” to pester about the matter. Usually Mal received the bedbug letter for his efforts, or no reply at all.
Still undaunted, Hughes has now decided to put more effort into passing the torch. The following is a conversation that I helped him reconstruct. Picture it happening in a pub. We cleaned up the language a bit, OK?
A Torch-Passing Conversation
Mal: It’s amazing how fast the years are flying by me. I’ve just noticed that next week is the 25th anniversary of the Port Arthur massacre. Do you remember that? It was in 1996.
Millennial: No. I was born in ’91, so I was only in Kindy. Who got massacred?
Mal: About 35 people were shot, most of them in a café. it must’ve been a good marksman who did it.
Millennial: Did they catch him?
Mal: Definitely not, but they caught an innocent guy named Martin Bryant.
Millennial: So what did they have on him?
Mal: The main thing they had on him was that he had long blond hair; he was a surfer. I mean the real Martin Bryant had long blond hair and if they wanted to set him up to cop the blame, they only had to find another young man with blond hair. Or find a young man and put a blond wig on him.
Millennial: Well, if they’ve had 25 years to work it out, why didn’t they get the real guy?
Mal: I guess you could say they don’t want to catch the real guy.
Millennial: I know what you mean. It must have been a false flag. What were they trying to fool the people about?
Mal: In my best guess, John Howard’s government set out to take everybody’s guns away. No sooner did he come into office in’ 96….
Millennial: Who’s John Howard?
Mal: Prime Minister, Liberal Party, right after Labor, Paul Keating. No sooner did Howard move into The Lodge than he was gung-ho anti-gun. Here is a photo of him talking to a crowd that was not too pleased about him offering to buy back all the guns in Australia.
Millennial: What if you had five guns, you could just admit to two of them.
Mal: I suppose there was some of that. The buyback cost a half billion dollars. Anyway, they worked laboriously to pin it on Martin and the media helped by dressing up the Martin story with lurid details.
Millennial: Like what?
Mal: Like that he was wild. Look at the picture of him that appeared on the front page of The Mercury about 24 hours after the massacre. They bugged out his eyeballs.
Mal: And there’s a shot of him (above below the title), after the hospital, looking more normal.
Millennial: What was he in hospital for?
Mal: They captured him by setting a cottage on fire and he came staggering out with burns on his back. It’s terrible that your generation is unaware of these things. If I tell you about it, can you pass it on to other young people?
Millennial: Sure, but wasn’t there a court case? Couldn’t he appeal?
Mal: Not exactly, because he’s intellectually handicapped and the lawyer he had, John Avery, got him to plead guilty.
Millennial: Like the Boston Marathon guy.
Mal: Holy cow, you know about the Boston case and you don’t know about Tasmania!
Millennial: Is Port Arthur in Tasmania?
Mal: Yes. There’s a big tourist operation there at the Port Arthur Historic Site.
Millennial: OK, I do know that the prison there was for the convicts that came over from England, like in the song.
Mal: Right. Look, I went there a few years ago to sleuth around and took this photo.
Mal: I also took this photo of the Broad Arrow Cafe where the shooting occurred, but they have part demolished it as they always do.
Millennial: How could the cafe have yielded any clues about the gunman?
Mal: Well, one example is that some of the employees in the gift shop tried to escape that day, but they were blocked by a faulty locked door. It is pathetic that their families did not get the compensation they were entitled to.
Millennial: So who arranged for that door to be locked?
Mal: Wendy Scurr had all the details. You can watch her on YouTube. She was close by when the shooting started, as she worked at the Historic Site as an Information Officer. I wrote her up in my Great Australians series at GumshoeNews.com. But now she is deceased.
Millennial: Crikey, I think my mates will be interested in this case. But aren’t all the main characters dead?
Mal: No. If they were age 40 when it happened, they are only 65 now. One character was Ray Groom. I believe he was one of the main actors, or somebody’ slave, in planning the Port Arthur Massacre. He had been a cabinet member for the Liberal Party in Federal Government but stood down in 1984 and was elected to the Tasmanian Parliament in 1986 becoming Premier in 1992. He stepped down from that position in February 1996, when the Libs couldn’t form a government in their own right.
Millennial: Crikey, nobody steps down from federal to state parliament.
Mal: And wait till you hear this. Six weeks before the massacre, Groom took on all the relevant cabinet portfolios. So later if people had questions at parliamentary Question Time, they would be questioning just him.
Millennial: You have to give them credit, Mal. They’re not stupid. Do you think the action to disarm Australia’s population was so that when authorities try to enforce Covid-19, and things like that, outraged people would not be able to rebel violently?
Mal: Almost certainly. The UN mandates disarmament worldwide. Very funny. I call it long-term planning.
Millennial: Is Port Arthur still an open case?
Mal: No it’s not open. As far as the police are concerned, Martin did it.
Millennial: Can’t he appeal?
Mal: Technically he could get a fresh look at it by the courts, based on some law that Vanessa Goodwin brought in.
Millennial: Who is Vanessa?
Mal: Get out your handkerchief.
Millennial: We don’t do handkerchiefs anymore, Mal.
Mal: You know what I mean. Vanessa Goodwin was a lovely attorney general, age 48, but she died.
Millennial: It’s not a handkerchief I need; it’s a gun.
Mal: Now let me tell you about Martin Bryant’s trial. Namely, he didn’t have one.
Millennial: Everybody gets a trial.
Mal: Nope. For one thing, he was intellectually handicapped. But that did not cause Justice Cox to inquire if a guardian should speak for him.
Millennial: Maybe they’d let Ray Groom speak as his guardian.
Mal: Hey, you should get a job with these people. You’re a quick learner. Funny thing is, Martin wasn’t poverty ridden — he had inherited quite an estate. But Tassie parliament did a one-off legislation to seize his property, and so he had to depend on Legal Aid. Enter, John Avery a not particularly ethical lawyer.
Millennial: OK, you said they did a Boston on him.
Mal: Yes, Avery forced him to toss his innocence plea. Here’s another photo. From 2017, in The Mercury. Amazingly, John Avery has described the whole set-up and yet that does not get Martin out of prison.
Millennial: Can I visit him in prison?
Mal: Please do. They will try to tell you he refuses visits. My friend Cherri Bonney, who’s a well-known singer in Perth, tried to see Bryant. Her excuse was that she was delivering to him a CD of a song she wrote about him called “Wish I Knew How to Be Free.” But they kicked her out.
Millennial: This is getting better by the minute. I am surprised I never heard of it.
Mal: Go to GumshoeNews.com. In fact, while you’re there, download the book by Maxwell and McLachlan. They spewed out as much as they knew in 2015. And Keith Noble’s book, Mass Murder, is somewhere on the Internet.
Millennial: Have you pursued it beyond 2015?
Mal: There’s a retired barrister at GumshoeNews, Terry Shulze. He wants to push the fingerprint aspect. The real gunman had his hands on a tray in the cafe and drank from a Solo can. But as I said, police don’t go there.
Millennial: Are you hiding any clues?
Mal: There are two aspects I wish I could pursue. One has to do with the apparent involvement of ASIO in the massacre. Mary Maxwell and I investigated the 2014 shooting in the Lindt Chocolate cafe in Sydney, and she is sure the feds called the shots. I have it from my sources that 30 Intelligence Agents have been identified at the Port Arthur Historic Site that day, April 28, 1996. Seven of the dead are known to be Intelligence Agents.
Millennial: Shite, they needed to be bumped off for some other reason. And what is your other lead?
Mal: Some years ago, a young man was accused of having been the shooter, Benjamin Overbeeke. I can’t say that there is any proof of it, but soon after his name started to be bandied about on the Internet, the boy fell from a crane or something and died.
Millennial: Sounds suspicious.
Mal: Yes, and his father was also a possible suspect. Someone said he was seen riffling thru the pockets of the deceased victims in the Broad Arrow Cafe, wearing wellington boots, which would protect from bloodstains.
Millennial: Is he dead now, too?
Mal: No. Mary Maxwell interviewed him in Adelaide around 2017 and she came away thinking he was no killer.
Millennial: Mal, please sum up — how do you feel about the case?
Mal: Easy. I want them all to rot in hell. But you are cheering me up by your interest. I have felt that when my group dies out nobody’s going to bother. Martin will still be locked up.
Millennial: I’ll see what I can do, Mal. Thanks for putting some trust in me.
Friend of the Treehouse, Peter Duke, introduced me to this story and it is blood-boiling, yet awesome.
A young man named Lucas Lepejian is in a battle with Burbank authorities who are trying to run him out of business. Lucas is the 20-year-old son of Baret Lepejian the proprietor of a long-standing western-themed restaurant called Tinhorn Flats; a well known place to dine in Burbank, California.
Local authorities have attempted to shut down Tinhorn Flats repeatedly. Each time Lucas defies the orders and reopens.
Lucas has been arrested three times in defiance of the ridiculous COVID shutdown.
The issue now is personal, the authorities are intent on destroying his business… Lucas, and a small battalion of supporters, remain defiant.
TIMELINE & DETAILS: Tinhorn Flats is the oldest bar in Burbank. In March of 2020 they shut down in compliance with state guidelines. They reopened in November 2020, and when the second lockdown was announced their defiance began.
Burbank authorities first cited and fined Tinhorn Flats. Lucas refused to pay and stayed open. Burbank authorities cut their utilities. Lucas brought in generators and stayed open. Burbank authorities Red tagged his restaurant and locked the doors. Lucas cut the locks and reopened. Burbank authorities boarded up the doors and ‘red tagged’ again as unsafe. Lucas sawed off the boards and reopened his business. Burbank police then arrested Lucas. Lucas made bail and was released.
Regular protests then began to support Lucas. Burbank authorities came back and replaced the boards (thicker w/ security nails). Lucas sawed off those boards and reopened business. Burbank police then arrested Lucas the second time. Lucas made bail and was released. Burbank authorities again replaced the boards on the doors and added sand bags; (police later announced that anyone moving a sandbag would be arrested). Lucas removed the sandbags. Lucas was arrested, made bail and was released.
Today the city of Burbank installed fences around the property…. the battle continues.
Lucas and Baret Lepejian are being represented by attorney Mark Geragos [SEE HERE].
“As anyone can see from the Tinhorn Flats’ Instagram page, the restaurant supports freedom, capitalism and President Trump, and reviles tyranny, socialism and Governor Newsom. No wonder they are in the crosshairs — but no wonder they are in the fight!
Join the 🤡🌎 police force where you swear an oath to uphold the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and then go bust small business owners while Costco and Amazon rape the American public. #goalzpic.twitter.com/MJ7bFbQxHP
Left-wing pop superstar Cher believes Democrats are the only thing standing in the way of the GOP achieving what she says is the party’s “dream of white supremacy,” contending “they bring Jim Crow back” despite the fact that Democrats historically introduced, supported, and championed Jim Crow Laws in the U.S.
“’VOTER SUPPRESSION,’” Cher began. “2 Words That Define Immoral Republican Pols. They Bring Jim Crow Back, Wrap Themselves In The,&Have Gone 2 ‘Whites Only’2BLK, ETHNIC,& POOR DEMS FROM VOTING,& WINNING.”
“IF THERE R NO DEMS 2 PROTECT,Gop WILL ACHIEVE THE DREAM THEY’VE4. ‘WHITE SUPREMACY,’” the “Strong Enough” singer told her 3.9 million Twitter followers.
“VOTER SUPPRESSION.” 2 Words That Define Immoral Republican Pols. They Bring Jim Crow Back,Wrap Themselves In The🇺🇸,&Have Gone 2 “Whites Only”2BLK, ETHNIC,& POOR DEMS FROM VOTING,& WINNING.IF THERE R NO DEMS 2 PROTECT🇺🇸,Gop WILL ACHIEVE THE DREAM THEY’VE🙏🏻4. “WHITE SUPREMACY”
Cher later responded to a commenter who said “the right to vote shouldn’t come with barriers” in a democracy, triggering the left-wing activist to declare in all caps, “THIS IS NOT DEMOCRACY‼️”
“ITS GOP’S MANTRA ‘WHITE IS RIGHT’,& ‘ONLY THE RIGHT PPL SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO VOTE’ Why aren’t Dems Quaking in Their Boots About The Browning of. I’m Excited.We Are Better Together,” she added.
“VOTER SUPPRESSION.” 2 Words That Define Immoral Republican Pols. They Bring Jim Crow Back,Wrap Themselves In The🇺🇸,&Have Gone 2 “Whites Only”2BLK, ETHNIC,& POOR DEMS FROM VOTING,& WINNING.IF THERE R NO DEMS 2 PROTECT🇺🇸,Gop WILL ACHIEVE THE DREAM THEY’VE🙏🏻4. “WHITE SUPREMACY”
Nowhere in Cher’s tweets did she mention the fact that the Democrat Party is solely responsible for pushing and enacting Jim Crow Laws in the United States. The Democrat Party championed slavery and segregation, dating back to the country’s founding through the Civil War era. All the while, Democrat Party figures stood hand in hand with the pro-slavery KKK and worked to usher in the era of Jim Crow. While history may be lost on modern-day woke leftists, Republicans, such as Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX), remember and have made a point to bring the facts to the forefront of political discussions.
Last year, Gohmert introduced a privileged resolution to ban the Democrat Party for its roots of racism and ties to the Confederacy — a call which came as Democrats, ignoring their own history, began to demand historic statues to be taken down while calling for reparations in the name of equality.
Gohmert provided a list of key instances of the Democrat Party supporting and promoting racist policies, as Breitbart News detailed:
The Democratic Party platforms of 1840, 1844, 1848, 1852, and 1856 stated “that all efforts of the abolitionists, or others, made to induce Congress to interfere with questions of slavery . . . are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences; and that all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people and endanger the stability and permanency of the Union, and ought not to be countenanced by any friend of our political institutions.”
The Democratic Party platform of 1856 declared that “new states” to the Union should be admitted “with or without domestic slavery, as [the state] may elect.”
The Democratic Party platform of 1856 declared that “we recognize the right of the people of all the Territories . . . to form a Constitution, with or without domestic slavery.”
The Democratic Party platform of 1860, in seeking to uphold the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 that required law enforcement officials to arrest any individual suspected of being a runaway slave, stated that “the enactments of the State Legislatures to defeat the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave Law are hostile in character, subversive of the Constitution, and revolutionary in their effect.”
No Democrat in Congress supported the 14th Amendment, which gave full citizenship to freed slaves. It passed in 1868 with 94 percent Republican support and zero support from Democrats.
No Democrat in Congress supported the 15th Amendment, which gave freed slaves the right to vote. It passed in 1870 with 100 percent Republican support and zero support from Democrats.
Various state Democratic Party officials enacted policies to disenfranchise and “systematically suppress” the right of African Americans to vote. The resolution specifically cites the 1902 Constitution of the State of Virginia that disenfranchised about 90 percent of the African American voters at the time, forcibly reducing the number of eligible African American voters from about 147,000 in 1901 to about 10,000 by 1905. The resolution notes that this measure was “supported almost exclusively by Virginia Democrats.”
The administration of President Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat, “began a racial segregation policy for U.S. government employees and, by 1914, the Wilson administration’s Civil Service instituted the requirement that a photograph be submitted with each employment application.”
When the Democratic Party held its national convention in 1924 in New York City at Madison Square Garden, the event was commonly referred to as the “Klan-Bake” due to the influence of the Ku Klux Klan in the party.
Senate Democrats held a 75-calendar day filibuster against the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Former Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV), a known recruiter for the KKK, led the Democrats to oppose civil rights for African Americans.
Democrats “enacted and enforced Jim Crow laws and civil codes that forced segregation and restricted freedoms” for African Americans.
In June, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) ordered the removal of the portraits of four previous Speakers of the House who served in the Confederacy, stating that these portraits “set back our nation’s work to confront and combat bigotry.” However, Gohmert’s resolution notes that the Speakers that Pelosi removed (Robert M.T. Hunter, Howell Cobb, James L. Orr, and Charles F. Crisp) were all Democrats.
Despite that, leftists, including Cher, have continued to ignore their own party’s history while accusing Republicans of attempting to usher in the era of Jim Crow by pursuing basic election integrity measures in states across the country.
“Some of these voter suppression laws in Georgia and other Republican states smack of Jim Crow rearing its ugly head once again. It is 160 years since the 13, 14, and 15th amendments abolished slavery, and Jim Crow stills seems to be with us,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said during a Senate Rules and Administration Committee hearing on S. 1, or the “For the People Act,” last month.
Notably, a majority of voters, including a majority of black and Hispanic voters, support basic election integrity measures, such as voter ID.
American, United, and Southwest Airlines are grounding their Boeing 737 Max jets yet again due to what Boeing says are electrical system issues with the model.
Boeing says the airlines in question need to verify that one of the parts of the plane’s electrical system is sufficiently grounded. The company is working with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to fix the problem.
American said in a statement that it would ground 17 of the 24 737 Max planes they own, while United said it would ground 16 out of the 30 737 Max planes in their fleet. Southwest said it would ground 30 of the airline’s 58 737 Max planes in its fleet containing more than 700 planes.
All 737 Max planes were grounded worldwide between March 2019 and November 2020 after two fatal crashes occurred, killing 346 people on board those flights.
The airline manufacturer Boeing is not the only one under fire.
American Airlines and other companies have also come under fire from conservatives for supporting Major League Baseball (MLB)’s decision to move the All-Star Game from Atlanta to Denver due to a Georgia state law requiring voter identification at the polls.
When Texas passed a similar bill in the statehouse, American Airlines released a statement making its stance clear on voter ID.
“Earlier this morning, the Texas State Senate passed legislation with provisions that limit voting access. To make American’s stance clear: We are strongly opposed to this bill and others like it,” the statement read.
“As a Texas-based business, we must stand up for the rights of our team members and customers who call Texas home and honor the sacrifices made by generations of Americans to protect and expand the right to vote,” the statement continued.