Case Law: Bennett-Hullin v Clarke 1943 ~ Does the term “Person” include “Natural Person?”

Latin: a principle of construction whereby if words of a contract are ambiguous, of two equally possible meanings, they should be interpreted against the author, drafter or writer of the contract and not against the other party.

It is a general rule , that the words in a deed are to be construed most strongly contra proferentem , regard being had , however , to the apparent intention of the parties , as collected from the whole context of the instrument.

As observed by Mr.Justice Blackstone , the principle of self-preservation will make men sufficiently careful not to prejudice their own interest by too extensive meaning of their words , and hereby all manner of deceit in any grant is avoided ; for men would always affect ambiguous and intricate expression , provided they were afterwards at liberty to put their own construction upon them.

[Latin: a false description does not vitiate]

A rule applied where a description of something in a legal document is made up of more than one part, and one part is true, but the other false: if the part that is true describes the subject with sufficient legal certainty, then the untrue part will not vitiate the document.

vi•ti•ate

  • transitive verb
    To reduce the value or quality of; impair or spoil.
  • transitive verb
    To corrupt morally; debase: synonym: corrupt.
  • transitive verb
    To make ineffective (a contract or legal stipulation, for example); invalidate.

BENNETT HULLIN V CLARKE


If you can spare a few dollars for the creators of this website to continue their research to bring you more great content, any amount, no matter how great or small, would be greatly appreciated.

Source

We have tested 1,500 supposed "covid-19 positive" samples and found none! Only influenza A or B.