Adelaide Meetups

illness resulting from exposure to vaccinated individuals

Government pushing abuse of kids “for our own good” must end

by Watchdog

This meme got me thinking….

If kids are less at risk from this alleged virus than being struck by ruddy lightning, why the hell are we subjecting them to this abuse?May be an image of text that says "When children are masked, forced to breathe their own exhalations, incapable of seeing the smiles of their friends and loved ones, separated by plastic shields, and commanded to remain 6 feet apart from each other, they are not in school -they are in hell. Jim Meehan"

May be an image of text that says "When children are masked, forced to breathe their own exhalations, incapable of seeing the smiles of their friends and loved ones, separated by plastic shields, and commanded to remain 6 feet apart from each other, they are not in school -they are in hell. Jim Meehan"

“Oh, ” says some gormless loon, “it’s so they don’t catch it and infect vulnerable old people”

Really? So the experimental biochemical agents the gov has been enthusiastically injecting old people with is not much good then? Hardly worth the risk of the side effects and as yet unknown long term health problems

But look, I’m 69 and have had heart problems so I am theoretically in the “vulnerable”: category. To be honest I do not give a flying f**k. I’ll take my ruddy chances. What I DO NOT WANT is children abused like this on my account.

I’ll live the years I have left with my head up and my days warmed by the smiles of my grand children.

If I’m really worried (which I’m not as fear and. worry weaken the immune system) I can isolate myself, mask-up and become a hermit.

Even better, I can

  • quit smoking (done)
  • avoid alcohol (almost done)
  • avoid drugs (done)
  • have a healthy diet (done)
  • take plenty of vit D, C, Zinc etc (done)
  • have Ivermectin on stand by in case I ever need some extra help (where can I get some?)

But it’s MY effing responsibility so I’m damned if I am going to offload that responsibility onto children.

Bear in mind that as people get REALLY old and frail , they are not just vulnerable to the alleged COVID bug.

Even the flu or the common cold can kill them, so are we to condemn kids, by that logic, to wearing masks forever because there is the slight risk of someone who has lived their life might catch a cold and die?

If only for the sake of our kids, we as a nation need to man the f**k up and knock of wimping out at the whim of the chinless bozos who have hijacked the government and outlawed common ruddy sense.


The People’s Media

Media of the People, by the People, for the People



UK Reloaded


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


This Biden Proposal Could Make The USA a ‘Digital Dictatorship’

Trifecta: DARPA, IARPA And Now HARPA To Complete ‘Digital Dictatorship’


Technocrats are merging “health security” and “national security” to create the ultimate digital dictatorship. Three Technocrat-laced government agencies will operate in a lawless James Bond-esque fashion to sidestep all regulations.

This is a must-read article. Note that former Google CEO, Eric Schmidt, is right in the middle of HARPA (actually, the acronym is ARPA-H but “HARPA” is more easily pronounceable.) Also note that the HARPA initiative started under the Trump administration but is being implemented by Biden.

HARPA is the Holy Grail of massive, ubiquitous surveillance seen by Technocrats as necessary to control society according to their “science of social engineering.” What if you don’t want to be scientifically engineered? Read on… ⁃ TN Editor



A “new” proposal by the Biden administration to create a health-focused federal agency modeled after DARPA is not what it appears to be. Promoted as a way to “end cancer,” this resuscitated “health DARPA” conceals a dangerous agenda.


Last Wednesday, President Biden was widely praised in mainstream and health-care–focused media for his call to create a “new biomedical research agency” modeled after the US military’s “high-risk, high-reward” Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA. As touted by the president, the agency would seek to develop “innovative” and “breakthrough” treatments for cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and diabetes, with a call to “end cancer as we know it.”

[embedded content]

[embedded content]

Far from “ending cancer” in the way most Americans might envision it, the proposed agency would merge “national security” with “health security” in such as way as to use both physical and mental health “warning signs” to prevent outbreaks of disease or violence before they occur. Such a system is a recipe for a technocratic “pre-crime” organization with the potential to criminalize both mental and physical illness as well as “wrongthink.”

The Biden administration has asked Congress for $6.5 billion to fund the agency, which would be largely guided by Biden’s recently confirmed top science adviser, Eric Lander. Lander, formerly the head of the Silicon Valley–dominated Broad Institute, has been controversial for his ties to eugenicist and child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his relatively recent praise for James Watson, an overtly racist eugenicist. Despite that, Lander is set to be confirmed by the Senate and Congress and is reportedly significantly enthusiastic about the proposed new “health DARPA.”

This new agency, set to be called ARPA-H or HARPA, would be housed within the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and would raise the NIH budget to over $51 billion. Unlike other agencies at NIH, ARPA-H would differ in that the projects it funds would not be peer reviewed prior to approval; instead, hand-picked program managers would make all funding decisions. Funding would also take the form of milestone-driven payments instead of the more traditional multiyear grants.

ARPA-H will likely heavily fund and promote mRNA vaccines as one of the “breakthroughs” that will cure cancer. Some of the mRNA vaccine manufacturers that have produced some of the most widely used COVID-19 vaccines, such as the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, stated just last month that “cancer is the next problem to tackle with mRNA tech” post-COVID. BioNTech has been developing mRNA gene therapies for cancer for years and is collaborating with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to create mRNA-based treatments for tuberculosis and HIV.

Other “innovative” technologies that will be a focus of this agency are less well known to the public and arguably more concerning.

The Long Road to ARPA-H

ARPA-H is not a new and exclusive Biden administration idea; there was a previous attempt to create a “health DARPA” during the Trump administration in late 2019. Biden began to promote the idea during his presidential campaign as early as June 2019, albeit using a very different justification for the agency than what had been pitched by its advocates to Trump. In 2019, the same foundation and individuals currently backing Biden’s ARPA-H had urged then-president Trump to create “HARPA,” not for the main purpose of researching treatments for cancer and Alzheimer’s, but to stop mass shootings before they happen through the monitoring of Americans for “neuropsychiatric” warning signs.

For the last few years, one man has been the driving force behind HARPA—former vice chair of General Electric and former president of NBCUniversal, Robert Wright. Through the Suzanne Wright Foundation (named for his late wife), Wright has spent years lobbying for an agency that “would develop biomedical capabilities—detection tools, treatments, medical devices, cures, etc.—for the millions of Americans who are not benefitting from the current system.” While he, like Biden, has cloaked the agency’s actual purpose by claiming it will be mainly focused on treating cancer, Wright’s 2019 proposal to his personal friend Donald Trump revealed its underlying ambitions.

As first proposed by Wright in 2019, the flagship program of HARPA would be SAFE HOME, short for Stopping Aberrant Fatal Events by Helping Overcome Mental Extremes. SAFE HOME would suck up masses of private data from “Apple Watches, Fitbits, Amazon Echo, and Google Home” and other consumer electronic devices, as well as information from health-care providers to determine if an individual might be likely to commit a crime. The data would be analyzed by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms “for early diagnosis of neuropsychiatric violence.”

The Department of Justice’s pre-crime approach known as DEEP was activated just months before Trump left office; it was also justified as a way to “stop mass shootings before they happen.” Soon after Biden’s inauguration, the new administration began using information from social media to make pre-crime arrests as part of its approach toward combatting “domestic terror.” Given the history of Silicon Valley companies collaborating with the government on matters of warrantless surveillance, it appears that aspects of SAFE HOME may already be covertly active under Biden, only waiting for the formalization of ARPA-H/HARPA to be legitimized as public policy.

The national-security applications of Robert Wright’s HARPA are also illustrated by the man who was its lead scientific adviser—former head of DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office Geoffrey Ling. Not only is Ling the main scientific adviser of HARPA, but the original proposal by Wright would have Ling both personally design HARPA and lead it once it was established. Ling’s work at DARPA can be summarized by BTO’s stated mission, which is to work toward merging “biology, engineering, and computer science to harness the power of natural systems for national security.” BTO-favored technologies are also poised to be the mainstays of HARPA, which plans to specifically use “advancements in biotechnology, supercomputing, big data, and artificial intelligence” to accomplish its goals.

The direct DARPA connection to HARPA underscores that the agenda behind this coming agency dates back to the failed Bio-Surveillance project of DARPA’s Total Information Awareness program, which was launched after the events of September 11, 2001. TIA’s Bio-Surveillance project sought to develop the “necessary information technologies and resulting prototype capable of detecting the covert release of a biological pathogen automatically, and significantly earlier than traditional approaches,” accomplishing this “by monitoring non-traditional data sources” including “pre-diagnostic medical data” and “behavioral indicators.”

While nominally focused on “bioterrorist attacks,” TIA’s Bio-Surveillance project also sought to acquire early detection capabilities for “normal” disease outbreaks. Bio-Surveillance and related DARPA projects at the time, such as LifeLog, sought to harvest data through the mass use of some sort of wearable or handheld technology. These DARPA programs were ultimately shut down due to the controversy over claims they would be used to profile domestic dissidents and eliminate privacy for all Americans in the US.

That DARPA’s past total surveillance dragnet is coming back to life under a supposedly separate health-focused agency, and one that emulates its organizational model no less, confirms that many TIA-related programs were merely distanced from the Department of Defense when officially shut down. By separating the military from the public image of such technologies and programs, it made them more palatable to the masses, despite the military remaining heavily involved behind the scenes. As Unlimited Hangout has recently reported, major aspects of TIA were merely privatized, giving rise to companies such as Facebook and Palantir, which resulted in such DARPA projects being widely used and accepted. Now, under the guise of the proposed ARPA-H, DARPA’s original TIA would essentially be making a comeback for all intents and purposes as its own spin-off.

Silicon Valley, the Military and the Wearable “Revolution” 

This most recent effort to create ARPA-H/HARPA combines well with the coordinated push of Silicon Valley companies into the field of health care, specifically Silicon Valley companies that double as contractors to US intelligence and/or the military (e.g., Microsoft, Google, and Amazon). During the COVID-19 crisis, this trend toward Silicon Valley dominance of the health-care sector has accelerated considerably due to a top-down push toward digitalization with telemedicine, remote monitoring, and the like.

One interesting example is Amazon, which launched a wearable last year that purports to not only use biometrics to monitor people’s physical health and fitness but to track their emotional state as well. The previous year, Amazon acquired the online pharmacy PillPack, and it is not hard to imagine a scenario in which data from Amazon’s Halo wellness band is used to offer treatment recommendations that are then supplied by Amazon-owned PillPack.

Companies such as Amazon, Palantir, and Google are set to be intimately involved in ARPA-H’s activities. In particular, Google, which launched numerous health-tech initiatives in 2020, is set to have a major role in this new agency due to its long-standing ties to the Obama administration when Biden was vice president and to President Biden’s top science adviser, Eric Lander.

As mentioned, Lander is poised to play a major role in ARPA-H/HARPA if and when it materializes. Before becoming the top scientist in the country, Lander was president and founding director of the Broad Institute. While advertised as a partnership between MIT and Harvard, the Broad Institute is heavily influenced by Silicon Valley, with two former Google executives on its board, a partner of Silicon Valley venture capital firm Greylock Partners, and the former CEO of IBM, as well as some of its top endowments coming from prominent tech executives.

The Broad Institute, Source:

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who was intimately involved with Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign and who is close to the Democratic Party in general, chairs the Broad Institute as of this April. In March, Schmidt gave the institute $150 million to “connect biology and machine learning for understanding programs of life.” During his time on the Broad Institute board, Schmidt also chaired the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, a group of mostly Silicon Valley, intelligence, and military operatives who have now charted the direction of the US government’s policies on emerging tech and AI. Schmidt was also pitched as potential head of a tech-industry task force by the Biden administration.

Earlier, in January, the Broad Institute announced that its health-research platform, Terra, which was built with Google subsidiary Verily, would partner with Microsoft. As a result, Terra now allows Google and Microsoft to access a vast trove of genomic data that is poured into the platform by academics and research institutions from around the world.

In addition, last September, Google teamed up with the Department of Defense as part of a new AI-driven “predictive health” program that also has links to the US intelligence community. While initially focused on predicting cancer cases, this initiative clearly plans to expand to predicting the onset of other diseases before symptoms appear, including COVID-19. As noted by Unlimited Hangout at the time, one of the ulterior motives for the program, from Google’s perspective, was for Google to gain access to “the largest repository of disease- and cancer-related medical data in the world,” which is held by the Defense Health Agency. Having exclusive access to this data is a huge boon for Google in its effort to develop and expand its growing suite of AI health-care products.

The military is currently being used to pilot COVID-19–related biometric wearables for “returning to work safely.” Last December, it was announced that Hill Air Force Base in Utah would make biometric wearables a mandatory part of the uniform for some squadrons. For example, the airmen of the Air Force’s 649th Munitions Squadron must now wear a smart watch made by Garmin and a smart ring made by Oura as part of their uniform.

According to the Air Force, these devices detect biometric indicators that are then analyzed for 165 different biomarkers by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency/Philips Healthcare AI algorithm that “attempts to recognize an infection or virus around 48 hours before the onset of symptoms.” The development of that algorithm began well before the COVID-19 crisis and is a recent iteration of a series of military research projects that appear to have begun under the 2007 DARPA Predicting Health and Disease (PHD) project.

While of interest to the military, these wearables are primarily intended for mass use—a big step toward the infrastructure needed for the resurrection of a bio-surveillance program to be run by the national-security state. Starting first with the military makes sense from the national-security apparatus’s perspective, as the ability to monitor biometric data, including emotions, has obvious appeal for those managing the recently expanded “insider threat” programs in the military and the Department of Homeland Security.

One indicator of the push for mass use is that the same Oura smart ring being used by the Air Force was also recently utilized by the NBA to prevent COVID-19 outbreaks among basketball players. Prior to COVID-19, it was promoted for consumer use by members of the British Royal family and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey for improving sleep. As recently as last Monday, Oura’s CEO, Harpeet Rai, said that the entire future of wearable health tech will soon be “proactive rather than reactive” because it will focus on predicting disease based on biometric data obtained from wearables in real time.

Another wearable tied to the military that is creeping into mass use is the BioButton and its predecessor the BioSticker. Produced by the company BioIntelliSense, the sleek new BioButton is advertised as a wearable system that is “a scalable and cost-effective solution for COVID-19 symptom monitoring at school, home and work.” BioIntelliSense received $2.8 million from the Pentagon last December to develop the BioButton and BioSticker wearables for COVID-19.

BioIntelliSense CEO James Mault poses with the company’s BioSticker wearable. Source:

BioIntelliSense, cofounded and led by former Microsoft HealthVault developer James Mault, now has its wearable sensors being rolled out for widespread use on some college campuses and at some US hospitals. In some of those instances, the company’s wearables are being used to specifically monitor the side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine as opposed to symptoms of COVID-19 itself. BioIntelliSense is currently running a study, partnered with Philips Healthcare and the University of Colorado, on the use of its wearables for early COVID-19 detection, which is entirely funded by the US military.

While the use of these wearables is currently “encouraged but optional” at these pilot locations, could there come a time when they are mandated in a workplace or by a government? It would not be unheard of, as several countries have already required foreign arrivals to be monitored through use of a wearable during a mandatory quarantine period. Saint Lucia is currently using BioButton for this purpose. Singapore, which seeks to be among the first “smart nations” in the world, has given every single one of its residents a wearable called a “TraceTogether token” for its contact-tracing program. Either the wearable token or the TraceTogether smartphone app is mandatory for all workplaces, shopping malls, hotels, schools, health-care facilities, grocery stores, and hair salons. Those without access to a smartphone are expected to use the “free” government-issued wearable token.

The Era of Digital Dictatorships Is Nearly Here

Making mandatory wearables the new normal not just for COVID-19 prevention but for monitoring health in general would institutionalize quarantining people who have no symptoms of an illness but only an opaque algorithm’s determination that vital signs indicate “abnormal” activity.

Given that no AI is 100 percent accurate and that AI is only as good as the data it is trained on, such a system would be guaranteed to make regular errors: the question is how many. One AI algorithm being used to “predict COVID-19 outbreaks” in Israel and some US states is marketed by Diagnostic Robotics; the (likely inflated) accuracy rate the company provides for its product is only 73 percent. That means, by the company’s own admission, their AI is wrong 27 percent of the time. Probably, it is even less accurate, as the 73 percent figure has never been independently verified.

Adoption of these technologies has benefitted from the COVID-19 crisis, as supporters are seizing the opportunity to accelerate their introduction. As a result, their use will soon become ubiquitous if this advancing agenda continues unimpeded.

Though this push for wearables is obvious now, signs of this agenda were visible several years ago. In 2018, for instance, insurer John Hancock announced that it would replace its life insurance offerings with “interactive policies” that involve individuals having their health monitored by commercial health wearables. Prior to that announcement, John Hancock and other insurers such as Aetna, Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare offered various rewards for policyholders who wore a fitness wearable and shared that data with their insurance company.

In another pre-COVID example, the Journal of the American Medical Association published an article in August 2019 that claimed that wearables “encourage healthy behaviors and empower individuals to participate in their health.” The authors of the article, who are affiliated with Harvard, further claimed that “incentivizing use of these devices [wearables] by integrating them in insurance policies” may be an “attractive” policy approach. The use of wearables for policyholders has since been heavily promoted by the insurance industry, both prior to and after COVID-19, and some speculate that health insurers could soon mandate their use in certain cases or as a broader policy.

These biometric “fitness” devices—such as Amazon’s Halo—can monitor more than your physical vital signs, however, as they can also monitor your emotional state. ARPA-H/HARPA’s flagship SAFE HOME program reveals that the ability to monitor thoughts and feelings is an already existing goal of those seeking to establish this new agency. 

According to World Economic Forum luminary and historian Yuval Noah Harari, the transition to “digital dictatorships” will have a “big watershed” moment once governments “start monitoring and surveying what is happening inside your body and inside your brain.” He says that the mass adoption of such technology would make human beings “hackable animals,” while those who abstain from having this technology on or in their bodies would become part of a new “useless” class. Harari has also asserted that biometric wearables will someday be used by governments to target individuals who have the “wrong” emotional reactions to government leaders. 

Unsurprisingly, one of Harari’s biggest fans, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, has recently led his company into the development of a comprehensive biometric and “neural” wearable based on technology from a “neural interface” start-up that Facebook acquired in 2019. Per Facebook, the wearable “will integrate with AR [augmented reality], VR [virtual reality], and human neural signals” and is set to become commercially available soon. Facebook also notably owns the VR company Oculus Rift, whose founder, Palmer Luckey, now runs the US military AI contractor Anduril.

As recently reported, Facebook was shaped in its early days to be a private-sector replacement for DARPA’s controversial LifeLog program, which sought to both “humanize” AI and build profiles on domestic dissidents and terror suspects. LifeLog was also promoted by DARPA as “supporting medical research and the early detection of an emerging pandemic.”

It appears that current trends and events show that DARPA’s decades-long effort to merge “health security” and “national security” have now advanced further than ever before. This may partially be because Bill Gates, who has wielded significant influence over health policy globally in the last year, is a long-time advocate of fusing health security and national security to thwart both pandemics and “bioterrorists” before they can strike, as can be heard in his 2017 speech delivered at that year’s Munich Security Conference. That same year, Gates also publicly urged the US military to “focus more training on preparing to fight a global pandemic or bioterror attack.”

In the merging of “national security” and “health security,” any decision or mandate promulgated as a public health measure could be justified as necessary for “national security,” much in the same way that the mass abuses and war crimes that occurred during the post-9/11 “war on terror” were similarly justified by “national security” with little to no oversight. Yet, in this case, instead of only losing our civil liberties and control over our external lives, we stand to lose sovereignty over our individual bodies.

The NIH, which would house this new ARPA-H/HARPA, has spent hundreds of millions of dollars experimenting with the use of wearables since 2015, not only for detecting disease symptoms but also for monitoring individuals’ diets and illegal drug consumption. Biden played a key part in that project, known as the Precision Medicine initiative, and separately highlighted the use of wearables in cancer patients as part of the Obama administration’s related Cancer Moonshot program. The third Obama-era health-research project was the NIH’s BRAIN initiative, which was launched, among other things, to “develop tools to record, mark, and manipulate precisely defined neurons in the living brain” that are determined to be linked to an “abnormal” function or a neurological disease. These initiatives took place at a time when Eric Lander was the co-chair of Obama’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology while still leading the Broad Institute. It is hardly a coincidence that Eric Lander is now Biden’s top science adviser, elevated to a new cabinet-level position and set to guide the course of ARPA-H/HARPA.

Thus, Biden’s newly announced agency, if approved by Congress, would integrate those past Obama-era initiatives with Orwellian applications under one roof, but with even less oversight than before. It would also seek to expand and mainstream the uses of these technologies and potentially move toward developing policies that would mandate their use.

If ARPA-H/HARPA is approved by Congress and ultimately established, it will be used to resurrect dangerous and long-standing agendas of the national-security state and its Silicon Valley contractors, creating a “digital dictatorship” that threatens human freedom, human society, and potentially the very definition of what it means to be human.

Featured image – Oura Ring biometric tracker. Source:




Published to The Liberty Beacon from


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.


Exclusive– Ashley Hinson: Elise Stefanik Right Person to ‘Steer’ House GOP Ship to Take Back Majority in 2022

Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-IA) told Breitbart News in an exclusive interview Friday that Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) is the right person to “steer” the House Republican “ship” as the House GOP Conference chair to take the House majority during the 2022 midterm elections.

Hinson spoke to Breitbart News as the House Republican Conference remains poised to remove Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) as the third-ranking Republican. Republicans have argued that Cheney has served as a distraction from a conference that should be focused on taking the speaker’s gavel from Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).

Hinson, a freshman congresswoman, said Stefanik should serve as the third-ranking Republican because the New York Republican can refocus the conference on messaging against Democrats’ “destructive” policies.

She said, “I think the most important factor in my decision was that we need to be focused as a conference on taking back the House in 2022, and our party leadership needs to be focused on that as well. And, that’s the only way we’re going to stop the destructive liberal agenda as it’s being pushed right now by Speaker Pelosi and President Biden. And, if Republicans are divided and not focusing all of our efforts against the radical policies, I see it as the surest way Pelosi will remain in power. So, that’s why I decided to support Elise because I respect Congressman Cheney’s record and service to our country, but I believe Elise right now is the right person to unify us and help lead our conference so we can take that majority in 2022.”

“I think when it comes to fundraising and messaging, she’s been a leader in both of those areas. We’ve seen her being a strong voice for conservative women all over the country,” she added. “When I look at who can help us as a conference to draw that sharp contrast between the Democrat vision for our country and the Republican vision for our country, I think Elise is the right person to steer the ship, and Republicans deliver that unified message to the American people and our agenda.”

Hinson said that Republicans, including herself, should focus on issues relating to border security, reining in big tech, and protecting American freedoms.

She said, “I am focused on telling the stories of Iowans, what the real-world impact these policies are going to have on my constituents back home, and I think everyone in our conference is focused on that. We’re focused on those common-sense economic policies, securing our border, talking about how every state in this country is a border state right now. We want to make sure that every American, every Iowan, has freedom and opportunity.”

Hinson said she remains confident that Republicans can take back the House but that underscores the need for GOP unity and the need to relay why their policies are better for the American people.

“I’m confident we’re going to take back the House, and I think those retirements are early signals, but it’s our jobs to tell these stories about why the Democrat policies are wrong for the country because that’s the mission to get to the point where we can win back the majority in 2022, and we’re also talking as a conference about why our policies are better,” she said.

“We’ve recruited great candidates across the country, we’re recruiting more every day, and that’s the way we win back the majority,” the Iowa conservative said.

Hinson said her freshman class of 2020, which helped Republicans come within striking distance of taking back the House majority, serves as a potential model for future congressional elections.

She said, “If you look at the class that I’m a part of, the 2020 freshman class, anyone who flipped a seat was a woman, a minority, or a veteran. When I look at the makeup of our class, our class looks like America; that’s the message we’re taking across the country.”

Sean Moran is a congressional reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter @SeanMoran3.



Oklahoma Governor Signs Bill Banning Teaching of Critical Race Theory

Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt (R) signed a bill Friday that will ban the teaching of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in the state’s public schools.

CRT is a Marxist-based philosophy that embraces the concept that all social and cultural issues should be viewed through the lens of race and racial identity.

Critics of CRT say its emphasis on identity politics creates greater division, rather than unity.

Stitt said in a video statement on Twitter:

Now more than ever, we need policies that bring us together, not rip us apart. And as governor, I firmly believe that not one cent of taxpayer money should be used to define and divide young Oklahomans about their race or sex. That is what this bill upholds for public education.

Stitt read from HB 1775: “No teacher shall require or make part of a course that one race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex.”

He explained that while historic events such as the Oklahoma City bombing, the Tulsa Race Massacre, and the Oklahoma City lunch counter sit-ins, should be part of school curricula, they should be taught “without labeling a young child as an oppressor or requiring he or she feel guilt or shame, based on their race or sex.”

The governor continued:

I refuse to tolerate otherwise during a time when we are already so polarized. We cannot revert to 100-year-old thinking, that a person is any less valuable, or inherently racist by the color of their skin. Martin Luther King spoke of a day when people in America would be judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. House Bill 1775 codifies that concept, that so many of us believe in our hearts, including me, and as governor, I will not stand for publicly funded K through 12 schools, training impressionable minds to define themselves by their sex or their race.

Democrats said the bill was unnecessary, reported the Associated Press.

“It is more than divisive,” said Alicia Andrews, chairperson of the Oklahoma Democratic Party. “It is exclusive and it acts to erase the existence of segments of our population.”

The report noted the Tulsa Race Massacre Centennial Commission also asked Stitt to veto the bill.


We have tested 1,500 supposed "covid-19 positive" samples and found none! Only influenza A or B.

Report: Hunter Biden’s Connected to ‘Chief Spy of China’ Through His Chinese-American Secretary

A business partner Hunter Biden called “the chief spy of China,” assigned the president’s son a Chinese-American secretary who was feeding him opposition research to help Joe Biden’s 2020 election bid after the business venture collapsed in 2018, the Daily Mail reported Friday.

The Daily Mail obtained the information from emails contained in Hunter Biden’s alleged “laptop from hell,” which has become the gift that will not stop giving to critics of President Joe Biden and his troubled son.

“Under the heading ‘Uncle Joe 2020,’ the former assistant encouraged the president’s son to tell his father to ‘lead by example,’ ‘bring back sensibility,’ and emphasize his experience and age as a strength,” the newspaper added.

News anchor freudian slips during a corona vax report that "They are running out of people who want to be euthanized"


On Friday, the Daily Mail revealed:

After launching his multi-million-dollar joint venture with CEFC, Hunter was assigned a 29-year-old Chinese-American assistant, JiaQi Bao, who quickly struck up a close and intriguing relationship with her Biden boss.

At first, emails show the New York-based Bao diligently scheduled flights, hotels, and even doctor’s appointments for the president’s son.

But mysteriously, the young assistant also sent him opposition research to help Joe Biden’s 2020 election bid, urged him to take cash from the joint venture’s accounts as the business collapsed and wrote flirty and personal messages and even ended up with Hunter’s military dog tags in her New York apartment – the same tags he can be seen wearing in home-made porn videos he recorded on his laptop.

After the joint venture had dissolved, Bao emailed Hunter with a conspiratorial message encouraging him to help his father run for president and listing talking points to combat criticism of Hunter’s dealings with the Chinese.

After only a year, the business venture between Hunter, his uncle, and the CEFC collapsed in 2018.

A joint report by the Senate Homeland Security and Finance ommittees issued in September 2020 examined Hunter’s business deal with CEFC, noting the company’s deep ties to the communist Chinese government. It determined that the millions of dollars transferred from the firm to Hunter and his uncle “raise criminal financial, counterintelligence and extortion concerns.”

Hunter’s secretary, Bao, appeared very invested in having Joe Biden beat Donald Trump.

In a March 2019 email to Hunter, Bao told Hunter, “You need to help Uncle Joe run for president. Your father should really run for 2020 for this country. He will be one of the best presidents in our country’s history.”

Echoing China’s foreign policy, Bao reportedly promoted negative stories about Trump for Hunter to use, “including allegations of selling citizenship to corrupt Chinese officials, his alleged links to a Chinese-owned Florida “prostitution parlor,” and letting human rights violations slide in negotiations with China.

Bao also took issue with Trump’s trade war with China, reportedly lambasting it as “a complete failure thus far, resulting in tremendous loss to Americans.”

Critics expected Joe Biden to be soft towards China, and Beijing appeared to favor him over Trump.

The Daily Mail reported that it is unclear whether Bao knew of Huner’s business partner’s alleged links to the Chinese intelligence services at the time because she has not returned requests for comment on this story.

Still, it acknowledged:

After partnering with Chinese oil giant CEFC in the multi-million-dollar deal, Bao was appointed as his secretary and assistant, acting as a go-between for his Chinese business partners, translating documents and performing clerical work for Hunter in the joint venture.

Hunter did not have any problem believing his new business partner at CEFC was linked to the Chinese intelligence agencies, describing Patrick Ho to a friend in an audio recording on his laptop as the “spy chief of China.”

In December 2020, Hunter admitted that he is currently the subject of an FBI investigation, allegedly for tax crimes. However, some news reports suggest the investigators may also be scrutinizing his dealings overseas.

The business venture between Hunter and CEFC collapsed in 2018, just a year after the president’s son and brother, uncle Jim, joined the deal under the impression it would yield billions of dollars.

After Hunter called his business partner “the chief spy in China,” U.S. law enforcement reportedly surveilled the Chinese businessman later as a “foreign intelligence threat” before his conviction for bribery in 2018.

“Ho was suspected of working with the Chinese intelligence services and had been monitored by federal law enforcement under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act,” the Daily Mail noted, citing court documents.

The Daily Mail added:

As Hunter’s joint venture with the Chinese began to crumble that month amid the arrests of its two leaders, Bao wrote one of her most surprising emails encouraging him to raid the coffers of one of Hunter and CEFC’s joint corporate vehicles called Hudson West.

At one point, she even offered for Hunter not to pay her for her “secretary” work.


We have tested 1,500 supposed "covid-19 positive" samples and found none! Only influenza A or B.

Podcast: Liz Cheney And The GOP’s Trump Litmus Test

Senior Editor Christopher Bedford joins Culture Editor Emily Jashinksy to talk this week in politics including the potential ousting of Rep. Liz Cheney, and how it raises the question: To what is extent is loyalty to Donald Trump a litmus test Republican leaders and Republican voters?

“On the one hand, you have a good chunk of the Republican base that is more loyal to Trump than they are to the Republican party,” Jashinsky said. “At the same time there is the contingency of suburban voters that are – Trump isn’t why they vote Republican.”

Listen here:


We have tested 1,500 supposed "covid-19 positive" samples and found none! Only influenza A or B.

Sloppy Journalism: The Associated Press is a “Superspreader” of Fake News

A recent Associated Press (AP) “report” entitled “The superspreaders behind top COVID-19 conspiracy theories”,  directed against several authors, academics and independent media including Global Research describes Michel Chossudovsky as “a professor emeritus of economics … and a conspiracy theorist who has argued the U.S. military can control the weather”. (emphasis added)

The insinuation is that Chossudovsky is a “Superspreader” intent upon misleading public opinion.

My response: “do you home work”.  Sloppy journalism and “Fake News” on this and other issues including Covid.

There is a vast literature on weather modification for military use. “Fact-checking”. The US Military can control the weather. And that is not a conspiracy theory, that’s a conspiracy fact.

I refer the distinguished AP journalists David Klepper, et al to consult the US Air Force document entitled “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025

We are dealing with REAL weapons of mass destruction and WHY is it not being reported upon.

It’s scary? Weather Modification for Military Use (2025) coincides chronologically with Joe Biden’s “New Cold War” and the World Economic Forum’s “Global Reset”.

I also suggest that the Associated Press consult the following document:

The Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques, United Nations, Geneva: 18 May 1977

Guided by the interest of consolidating peace, … and of saving mankind from the danger of using new means of warfare, (…) Recognizing that military … use of such [environmental modification techniques] could have effects extremely harmful to human welfare, Desiring to prohibit effectively military … use of environmental modification techniques in order to eliminate the dangers to mankind. … and affirming their willingness to work towards the achievement of this objective, (…) Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military … use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party.

(Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques, United Nations, Geneva, May 18, 1977. Entered into force: 5 October 1978)

What we are dealing with is a Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD) which has been virtually ignored by the mainstream media, with some exceptions. Its deployment by the US Air Force is in violation of the 1978 convention quoted above.

This CBC documentary below released in the 1990s says the truth.

Those were the days of honest journalism.

(I will not comment on what the CBC has become today).

To watch this engaging 15-minute CBC documentary online, click here.
[embedded content]

When the Lie Becomes the Truth. When War Becomes Peace

I have undertaken research on both “weather warfare” as well as the use of “low yield” tactical nuclear weapons which are now being upheld as an instrument of peace.

The mainstream media casually describes nuclear weapons as a means to achieving World peace. It’s called “nuclear peace”.

According to “scientific opinion” (quoted by the  mainstream media “Superspreaders”):

“controlled nuclear proliferation [by the US] may be beneficial for inducing stability”.

And Joe Biden is now committed to extending Obama’s $1.2 trillion dollar nuclear weapons program which is intended to protect the “Free World”. What nonsense!


See also

Michel Chossudovsky, Weather Warfare: Beware the US military’s experiments with climatic warfare, The Ecologist, December 2007

Michel Chossudovsky, The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction: “Owning the Weather” for Military Use, Global Research, September 27, 2004


Military Apprehends Pelosi Doppelganger

U.S. military assets have fudged a covert mission to apprehend House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, arresting instead a Pelosi doppelganger donning a lifelike mask that mimicked every hideous detail of Pelosi’s face, right down to the most deeply engrained wrinkles.

News anchor freudian slips during a corona vax report that "They are running out of people who want to be euthanized"


A confidential source involved in Trump’s war on the Deep State told RRN that the U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps on Monday opened a sealed indictment which Donald Trump and acting AG Jeffrey Rosen had authored toward the end of Trump’s term. Trump, our source said, had given JAG the document, with instructions to unseal it once the military had completed its investigation on Pelosi and corroborated a vast list of charges that include treason and sedition.

On Monday, May 3 JAG honcho Vice Adm. John G. Hannink coordinated the arrest with Marine Corps General Gary “Lurch” Thomas, and they picked, what our source called, a Marine reconnaissance squad for the operation.

“The Marines began surveillance on Pelosi’s San Francisco home on Tuesday. They used parabolic microphones and optical gear to keep tabs on her, and they followed her to and from her house for two days, keeping track of her schedule to make sure they’d grab her when no one else was around. Her husband was out of town on business for the week, so it was the perfect time,” our source said.

The Marines, he added, tried to grab Pelosi whilst she stepped outside to check her mailbox Thursday evening. They zip tied her, gagged her, and tossed her into an unmarked van. Within minutes, as the van sped toward a clandestine safehouse, they realized they’d been duped.

“The woman looked like Pelosi, same face, same measurements, heck a nearly identical voice. But as she struggled, the Marines realized this woman, who apparently is much younger in reality than Pelosi is, had a prosthetic Pelosi mask that covered her entire head, hair and all. It was Hollywood perfection,” our source said.

Realistic masks are common in the film industry and are typically made of polyurethane and silicone.

The Pelosi imposter, our source said, carried duplicates of Pelosi’s drivers license and library card, which the Marines found when they frisked and searched her. She refused to answer questions, saying only that she was an actress hired by Pelosi.

“She refused to identify herself. I don’t think they’ve cut her loose yet. Trump wants answers,” our source said.

In closing, our source said he believes the real Nancy Pelosi was tipped off and vanished into the shadows, there to dwell while the military hunts an unknown number of carbon copies.

“The Deep State is taking drastic action to protect its own,” our source said. “They don’t want what happened to Hillary Clinton to happen to them.”

(Visited 2 times, 2 visits today)


We have tested 1,500 supposed "covid-19 positive" samples and found none! Only influenza A or B.

Whitmer Didn’t Inform Law Enforcement She Used Private Plane for Florida Trip

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) bristled during a series of questions Thursday about a private plane she used to secretly travel to Florida in March.

Just days before she announced that residents should forego travel to the Sunshine State for spring break, Whitmer traveled to Florida for four days in the name of visiting her ailing father.

News broke Thursday she used the plane of a group of Detroit businessmen and she did not appear to appreciate the line of questioning during a press event on infrastructure:

“They say you went to Detroit businessmen to ask for their private plane to go to Florida to see your Dad. I wanted to give you the opportunity to respond to that report. Who paid for that trip when you went down to Florida,” the reporter asked.

“I’ve said everything I’m going to say about my trip to go check on my father. It was a quick trip, it was an important family, uh, reason for doing it and I’ve got nothing to add,” Whitmer responded.

“This issue, governor, is your office has been very secretive about it. So the question is, why so secretive about it?” he continued.

“We don’t discuss my travel,” Whitmer answered. “I’ve received an incredible number of death threats over the last year and a half. There are a lot of reasons that we don’t discuss how I travel and when I travel and that’s all I’m going to say,” she continued.

But the trip occurred nearly two months ago and Deadline Detroit reported Whitmer’s office did not contact Florida law enforcement, suggesting her personal safety was not an issue during the jaunt.

When a staffer asked reporters if they had any “on topic” questions related to roads, the journalist asked again about the secret trip.

“Can we at least hear the dates of that travel?” the reporter asked.

“I’ve told you I’ve said everything I’m going to say,” Whitmer snapped.

Whitmer traveled over a period of four days — March 12 through 15 — not the two days she previously claimed.

Kyle Olson is a reporter for Breitbart News. He is also host of “The Kyle Olson Show,” syndicated on Michigan radio stations on Saturdays–download full podcast episodes. Follow him on Parler.



Il mondo ritorna alla visione dei “cinque mari” di Assad

Come tutto è iniziato con Damasco, la fine verrà da Damasco

Durante il mandato dell’ex presidente americano George W. Bush e dopo l’ammissione pubblica del fallimento delle guerre da lui condotte attraverso la pubblicazione del famoso “rapporto Baker-Hamilton” emesso [6 dicembre 2006] da una commissione composta da membri dei partiti repubblicano e democratico del Congresso degli Stati Uniti, il presidente siriano Bashar al-Assad ha lanciato il suo appello per la formazione di un sistema regionale che riunisca gli stati che si affacciano su cinque mari [il Mar Mediterraneo, il Mar Rosso, il Mar Caspio, il Mar Nero e il Mar del Golfo Arabico] per riempire il vuoto lasciato dal fallimento americano.

Il presidente siriano aveva quindi avviato una prima mossa includendo Russia, Iran, Turchia, Egitto e Arabia Saudita, motivando i suoi alleati russi e iraniani ad accettare il suo invito e cercando di convincere Turchia, Arabia Saudita ed Egitto della portata dei rischi derivanti dal vuoto strategico annunciato; un vuoto che sarebbe stato riempito dal caos e dal terrorismo, a meno che non si trovasse un’alternativa che garantisse la stabilità nella regione.

News anchor freudian slips during a corona vax report that "They are running out of people who want to be euthanized"


Ma il Partito Democratico ha finito per rifiutare l’opzione raccomandata dal rapporto Baker-Hamilton di aprire alla Siria, che è il cuore stesso di questo sistema regionale a cinque mari, perché non includeva l’entità occupante israeliana. Questo nonostante il suo ruolo sia stato considerato decisivo di fronte alle guerre dei neoconservatori, dato che la Siria avrebbe contribuito a spianare la strada al ritorno dei democratici alla Casa Bianca, secondo le parole della presidente della Camera dei rappresentanti degli Stati Uniti, Nancy Pelosi, dopo la sua visita a Damasco e il suo incontro con il presidente Bashar al-Assad nel 2007.

Inoltre, con l’arrivo di Barak Obama al potere e lo sbocciare della cosiddetta primavera araba, divenne presto chiaro che l’opzione del caos e del terrorismo era diventata un’opzione ufficiale per Washington, dimostrando la validità delle previsioni del presidente al-Assad.

Infatti, da allora in poi, l’Egitto fu la prima vittima presa di mira dal caos e dal terrorismo avendo approfittato della rabbia del popolo egiziano che aspirava al cambiamento, fino a cadere sotto l’influenza della Fratellanza dei cosiddetti Fratelli Musulmani, prima che l’esercito lo recuperasse due anni dopo. Per quanto riguarda la Turchia e l’Arabia Saudita, hanno partecipato attivamente al nuovo piano americano, di cui la Siria era l’obiettivo principale: la Turchia, motivata da dichiarate ambizioni ottomane, essendo il perno e l’incubatore della guerra alla Siria; l’Arabia Saudita essendo il finanziatore, istigatore e organizzatore di gruppi terroristici che costituiscono l’”esercito ausiliario” di questa guerra, al fine di compensare l’inettitudine degli eserciti occidentali e l’esercito israeliano nel combattimento [terrestre].

È così che, negli ultimi dieci anni, la guerra in Siria è diventata una versione geograficamente ridotta di una terza guerra mondiale, sia per l’enormità delle risorse destinate a vincerla, sia per la molteplicità dei paesi coinvolti.

Ed è così che dieci anni dopo l’aggressione alla Siria, Egitto, Arabia Saudita e Turchia, invitati ieri a unirsi al sistema di stabilità regionale proposto dal presidente Al-Assad, si trovano oggi di fronte a scadenze drammatiche. L’Egitto è minacciato esistenzialmente dalla diga Rinascimento in Etiopia. Turchia e Arabia Saudita stanno raccogliendo i risultati del fallimento delle guerre in cui sono stati coinvolti, in Siria per la prima, in Siria e Yemen per la seconda.

Nel frattempo, è stata la resistenza ormai leggendaria della Siria la ragione decisiva del fallimento degli aggressori nel raggiungere i loro obiettivi principali, i suoi fedeli alleati che sono rimasti al suo fianco essendo pienamente consapevoli che questa non era solo una guerra alla Siria, ma anche una guerra progettata per cambiare il mondo dalla porta della Siria e seminare caos e terrorismo in esso.

Infatti, il piano degli alleati che hanno lanciato la guerra alla Siria è andato ben oltre i suoi confini. Attaccandola, hanno preso di mira la Russia nella sua sicurezza, la Cina nel suo accesso al Mediterraneo, l’Iran nel suo ruolo, la sua resistenza e le sue relazioni con i vari movimenti di resistenza, cercando di spezzare la schiena della Resistenza libanese e bloccare le sue vie di approvvigionamento. E, nel processo, hanno lavorato per garantire la sicurezza di Israele e dell’occupante americano in Iraq, per mettere il Libano nelle mani del “gruppo di Jeffrey Feltman” e, implicitamente, per tagliare la strada alla resistenza risorgente in Yemen, Palestina e Iraq.

Ma con la partenza dell’amministrazione dell’ex presidente Donald Trump e il fallimento dei suoi piani per far rivivere e generalizzare il caos e il terrorismo, a causa delle vittorie della Siria sulle organizzazioni ISIS-Daesh, il Fronte al-Nusra e i cosiddetti Fratelli Musulmani, la Casa Bianca si è aperta nuovamente a un’amministrazione democratica nella persona del presidente Joe Biden.

Una nuova amministrazione che ha riaffermato il fallimento delle guerre condotte dagli Stati Uniti e ha espresso l’intenzione di entrare in un processo di risoluzione dei conflitti, a partire dal ritorno all’accordo nucleare iraniano. Ha anche preso la decisione di ritirare le sue truppe dall’Afghanistan, sapendo bene che mantenere la stabilità è incompatibile con un vuoto strategico. Così come sa che non c’è più posto per l’entità occupante israeliana in un sistema destinato a preservare la stabilità regionale e che le politiche di normalizzazione, guidate da Donald Trump, sono incapaci di creare un contesto sul quale potrebbe contare a questo scopo.

E ora che la guerra sembra volgere al termine, con il suo principale sponsor che ha perso le possibilità di continuarla e si trova bloccato per mancanza di una strategia di uscita, ecco che Washington bussa alla porta di Teheran e Mosca, seguita dall’Arabia Saudita di fronte alla necessità di ammettere che le regole di ingaggio sono cambiate e la risposta significa: “Per noi, per andare avanti, dovete andare verso Damasco, perché è lì il cuore della questione”.

L’Arabia Saudita sta quindi cercando di normalizzare le sue relazioni con l’Iran e la Siria. E la Turchia, la cui presenza in Libia solleva importanti questioni internazionali e regionali, si sta muovendo per normalizzare le relazioni con l’Egitto.

Quindi, la domanda diventa di nuovo: “Quale sistema regionale sarebbe in grado di preservare la stabilità? “. Apparentemente, la risposta è che non ci sono altre possibilità degne di discussione per scegliere tra l’opzione dei cinque mari di Al-Assad e quella che porta al caos e al terrorismo. E infine, come tutto è iniziato con Damasco, la fine verrà da Damasco.

E Damasco rimarrà la capitale della regione

A questo proposito, ricordiamo che per anni i media hanno parlato di rapporti secondo cui Teheran e Mosca avevano raggiunto accordi in privato per decidere il futuro della presidenza in Siria. Al che abbiamo risposto: “Se è quello che vogliono, non lo avranno, ma non lo vogliono e non lo vorranno!”.

Ora, Teheran e Mosca sostengono la decisione del presidente Bashar al-Assad di rispettare la scadenza delle elezioni presidenziali secondo la costituzione siriana in vigore, così come la sua candidatura per un nuovo mandato. E questo, prima di tutti i negoziati che dovrebbero portare a una nuova costituzione che gli permetterebbe di correre per un primo e poi un secondo mandato, in modo che il detto ‘Al-Assad resta e gli altri vanno! “.

E ora i media ci raccontano delle delegazioni che si sono precipitate a Damasco, la risposta sentita da quelli dei paesi coinvolti nella guerra contro la Siria è invariabile: “Senza riorganizzare le relazioni con la Siria, la regione rimarrà bloccata in mezzo all’abisso”.

In altre parole, per chi non l’avesse notato, gli eventi si stanno muovendo verso una nuova realtà regionale e internazionale che sarà coronata dall’incontro al vertice tra il presidente Putin e il presidente Biden. Una realtà che inizierà con l’accordo sul nucleare iraniano e il cui ritmo dovrebbe accelerare dopo le elezioni presidenziali siriane aprendo sulla Siria attraverso questioni di grande importanza. Tra queste questioni: l’occupazione dei territori siriani da parte degli Stati Uniti e della Turchia, le aggressioni dell’esercito di occupazione israeliano, la questione dei separatisti curdi, la formulazione di una soluzione politica, il ritorno degli sfollati e la ricostruzione.

Questi sono sviluppi che alcuni potrebbero non essere in grado di digerire, ma saranno sufficienti per confermare che Damasco rimarrà la capitale della regione, che la Resistenza è la potenza nascente nella regione, e che il vicino Libano è il paese fratello della Siria e il centro della Resistenza, oltre ai loro nemici. Infatti, l’ora della verità farà capire a questi ultimi che non sono altro che nani anche se hanno occupato i troni della finanza e della politica per molti anni.

Quindi, è ragionevole immaginare un governo libanese nel 2022 che non stabilisca le migliori relazioni con la Siria? È ragionevole immaginare un governo e delle elezioni nel 2022 che non partano dall’equazione tra Damasco, la capitale della regione, e la Resistenza? Chiunque immagini questo farebbe bene a seguire questo consiglio: “Non stare in fondo alla carovana, non troverai nessuno ad accoglierti! “.

Nasser Kandil


*Politico libanese, ex deputato e direttore del quotidiano libanese “Al-Binaa”

Fonte: Sintesi di due articoli di Al-Binaa (Libano)

Traduzione dall’arabo al francese di Mouna Alno-Nakhal.

Le monde revient à la vision des « cinq mers » d’Al-Assad

Par Nasser Kandil, 07 mai 2021

Traduzione dal Francese all’italiano di Nora


1][Israele sta solo cercando di guadagnare tempo!]

[2][Trump e le missioni date al futuro re dei Saud salmani]

[3][Yemen / La battaglia di Al-Hodeida alla luce della “teoria dei cinque mari” di Bashar al-Assad]